DOCSLIB.ORG

FEIS for Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Forest Service Impact Statement Southwestern Region for Arizona Snowbowl February 2005 Facilities Improvements Volume 2 Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Coconino National Forest Coconino County, Arizona FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE ARIZONA SNOWBOWL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL VOLUME 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COCONINO NATIONAL FOREST COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 1.0 NEPA PROCESS...........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 USFS POLICY.............................................................................................................................................13 3.0 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE......................................................................................................................19 4.0 MODIFIED ALTERNATIVES..................................................................................................................21 5.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................25 6.0 WATER RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................................40 7.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS........................................................................................................................89 8.0 WILDERNESS ............................................................................................................................................91 9.0 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES.............................................................................................94 10.0 VEGETATION..........................................................................................................................................151 11.0 WILDLIFE ................................................................................................................................................160 12.0 INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES.................................................................................................172 13.0 TRAFFIC, PARKING AND RESORT ACCESS...................................................................................176 14.0 NOISE ........................................................................................................................................................183 15.0 RECREATION..........................................................................................................................................189 16.0 AESTHETIC RESOURCES ....................................................................................................................200 17.0 SOILS AND GEOLOGY..........................................................................................................................205 18.0 CLIMATE..................................................................................................................................................211 19.0 NIGHTLIGHTING...................................................................................................................................223 20.0 SUPPORTIVE COMMENTS ..................................................................................................................224 21.0 WATER IMPOUNDMENT .....................................................................................................................235 22.0 SNOWMAKING .......................................................................................................................................238 23.0 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE...............................................................................................................244 24.0 HUMPHREYS POD .................................................................................................................................260 25.0 AIR QUALITY..........................................................................................................................................262 26.0 PUBLIC SAFETY.....................................................................................................................................264 APPENDIX A: SUBSTANTIVE COMMENTORS ON THE DRAFT EIS APPENDIX B: COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED ON THE DEIS FROM TRIBES, FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES, AND ELECTED OFFICIALS Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 – Response to Comments Table of Contents RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE ARIZONA SNOWBOWL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS DRAFT EIS The Notice of Availability for the Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2004. The minimum 45-day comment period for a DEIS was extended to 60 days at the outset due to the controversial nature of this proposal, and ended on April 13. Copies of the DEIS were burned to CD and distributed to the public, with hard copies of the document sent to tribes. Hard copies were available to anyone who requested them throughout the 60-day comment period. In response to the DEIS, a total of 9,887 comments were received by the Forest Service via various mediums, including: letters; form letters; faxes, emails; public meeting comment forms, petitions and oral comments. This number accounts for numerous repetitious comments included in form letters and petitions. The number of commentors on the DEIS totaled 5,716 (the reader should note that some commentors submitted numerous and multiple forms of comments). Individuals who submitted comments outside of the 60-day comment period do not have standing to appeal the decision on this analysis, as per 36 CFR Part 215.13. However, all comments received outside of the comment period were retained and these individuals received copies of the FEIS. In addition, many comment letters were received in the general time of the DEIS comment period, but were clearly intended (as based on both date and content) to be submitted in response to the initial scoping period. These letters were recorded as such, and retained in the scoping project file. Every medium of conveying comments was scrutinized for substantive comments,1 and contact information for each commentor was entered into a master database. All substantive comments were extracted from each commentor, and were entered into the database, as well. These substantive comments provide the foundation for which this Response to Comments is based. Depending on the resource or context, substantive comments organized into 26 groupings (see Table of Contents), and responded to either individually or thematically. Individual comments were sufficiently unique enough in nature or context that they were carried forward verbatim into the RTC and responded to. Thematic comments were created to be representative of common themes that were expressed by numerous (in some cases hundreds of) individuals. Many tables and figures from the FEIS were carried forward into the responses provided in this RTC, and include table numbers for reference. Tables 1 Per 36 CFR Part 215, “substantive” comments are those that are “within the scope of the proposed action, are specific to the proposed action, have a direct relationship to the proposed action and include supporting reasons for the Responsible Official to consider.” Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 – Response to Comments Page 1 and figures that do not include numbers in their headings indicate that they are unique to the RTC and they are therefore not found in the FEIS. Appendix A of Volume 2 indicates the names and affiliations (if applicable) of people who submitted timely and substantive comments on the DEIS, and the general theme of their comment(s). Names and addresses of those submitting non-substantive comments were entered into the master database. All names and addresses were recorded with as much due diligence as possible, based on the legibility of information as submitted by the commentor. Letters received with illegible or incomplete names and addresses were retained in the project file. As required by Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Chapter 24.1(3), Appendix B of Volume 2 provides copies of comment letters received on the DEIS from Tribes, federal, state and local agencies and elected officials. Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 – Response to Comments Page 2 1.0 NEPA PROCESS Thematic Comments 1.1 Extend the comment deadline for the DEIS. NEPA requires that, at a minimum, the public be provided 45 days to comment on a Draft EIS. Due to the controversial nature of this project, the Coconino National Forest made the decision to extend this to 60 days. The Forest Supervisor concluded that two months provided ample time for the public to submit comments on the DEIS and, therefore, the comment period was not extended further. As indicated in Chapter 1 of the FEIS, 9,887 substantive comments were received on the DEIS. 1.2 The Forest Service should have conducted public meetings on the DEIS in the communities of the affected
Recommended publications
  • Monument Valley Meander

    Monument Valley Meander

    RV Traveler's Roadmap to Monument Valley Meander However you experience it, the valley is a wonder to behold, a harsh yet hauntingly beautiful landscape. View it in early morning, when shadows lift from rocky marvels. Admire it in springtime,when tiny pink and blue wildflowers sprinkle the land with jewel-like specks of color. Try to see it through the eyes of the Navajos, who still herd their sheep and weave their rugs here. 1 Highlights & Facts For The Ideal Experience Agathla Peak Trip Length: Roughly 260 miles, plus side trips Best Time To Go: Spring - autumn What To Watch Out For: When on Indian reservations abide by local customs. Ask permission before taking photos, never disturb any of the artifacts. Must See Nearby Attractions: Grand Canyon National Park (near Flagstaff, AZ) Petrified Forest National Park (near Holbrook, AZ) Zion National Park (Springdale, UT) 2 Traveler's Notes Monument Valley Navajo Tribal Park The stretch of Rte. 163 called the Trail of the Ancients in honor of the vanished Anasazis cuts across Monument Valley at the Utah border on its way to the little town of Mexican Hat. Named for a rock formation there that resembles an upside-down sombrero a whimsical footnote to the magnificence of Monument Valley—Mexican Hat is the nearest settlement to Goosenecks State Park, just ahead and to the west via Rtes. 261 and 316. The monuments in the park have descriptive names. They are based on ones imagination. These names were created by the early settlers of Monument Valley. Others names portray a certain meaning to the Navajo people.
  • A Summer Vacation in Arizona

    A Summer Vacation in Arizona

    JUNE 1959 FORTY CENTS IN THIS ISSUE: ASummer Vacation In Arizona VOL. XXXV NO. 6 JUNE 1959 You can't always tell by the cool calculations of the RAYMOND CARLSON, Editor calendar or the bobbing babble of the thermometer. The GEORGE M. A VEY, Art Editor testimony of the wayward sun is not always reliable. You JAMES E . STEVENS, Business Manager awaken one fine morning and for some indefinable reason LEGEND you know summer is just around the corner. There is a languor in the shadows and a soft sleepiness in the air that ARIZONA'S TIM BERED TREASURE 2 FORESTS OF STATE PRODUCE RICHES bespeak summer's approach. There is a drowsiness in the IN I.UMB E, R, Rf:C REATJO NAL ACTIVITIES. gossip of the green, green leaves caressed by the soft, THE PARADOX OF A LA\'A FLOW 8 warm breeze. You know that spring has had her Ring VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS IN NORTHERN ARIZONA CHANGED ENRICHED LAND. and another season is getting ready to cavort over the AN ARIZONA S ui\ Ii\TER VACATION landscape. //~-- ~.-.....,, ~ - JF YOU PL AN YO UR VACATION W"ELL, YOU'LL HAVE ONE COOL AND CAREFREE. we afe -n'i uch conce'_r.n'ea with summer this issue and SNOW IN JuLY 28 our p/ ges are an invitatiot~ ''.1} y ou to plan a cool and WHCN YOU CLIMB SA N FRANCISCO PEAKS careffee vacation in, our state.·, AiJ 'Of Northern Arizona ' , ,_ •. • IN J ULY YOU RUN INTO SURPRISES. is a huge sm:nmer v,ac~ti911 playgrouh~, where the scenery LONG MEADOW RANCH 34 is superb aricF1th.~' )-v:i::i:ther admirable -' for those who like Tms RANCH IN YAVAPAI COUNTY IS ONE //;') \ .
  • Supreme Court of the State of Arizona

    Supreme Court of the State of Arizona

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA HOPI TRIBE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-18-0057-PR Filed November 29, 2018 Appeal from the Superior Court in Coconino County The Honorable Mark R. Moran, Judge No. CV2011-00701 AFFIRMED Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One 244 Ariz. 259 (App. 2018) VACATED AND REMANDED COUNSEL: Martin P. Clare, Campbell, Yost, Clare & Norell, P.C., Phoenix; and Michael D. Goodstein (argued), Anne E. Lynch, Hunsucker Goodstein PC, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Hopi Tribe Paul G. Johnson, Scott F. Frerichs, John J. Egbert (argued), Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C., Phoenix, Attorneys for Arizona Snowbowl Resort Limited Partnership John A. Klecan (argued), Renaud Cook Drury Mesaros PA, Phoenix; and Kathleen L. Wieneke, Wieneke Law Group, P.L.C., Tempe, Attorneys for City of Flagstaff Timothy Sandefur, Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, Phoenix, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Goldwater Institute HOPI TRIBE V. ARIZONA SNOWBOWL RESORT Opinion of the Court JUSTICE PELANDER authored the opinion of the Court, in which VICE CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL and JUSTICES TIMMER, GOULD, and LOPEZ joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BALES, joined by JUSTICE BOLICK, dissented. JUSTICE PELANDER, opinion of the Court: ¶1 Private parties may bring public nuisance claims in Arizona if the alleged nuisance caused the plaintiff special injury, meaning “damage [that is] different in kind or quality from that suffered by the public in common.” Armory Park Neighborhood Ass’n v. Episcopal Cmty. Servs. in Ariz., 148 Ariz. 1, 5 (1985).
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A

    Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A

    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
  • The Rest of "On Target"…The Mountain Top Experience and Coaches Corner

    The Rest of "On Target"…The Mountain Top Experience and Coaches Corner

    OPERATION ON TARGET! GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA VARSITY SCOUTS Tuesday, September 16, 2008 Mike Heaton Bob Church Operation On Target Coordinator Regional On Target Coordinator Grand Canyon Council, BSA Southwest Region, BSA 855 E. 8th Street 1327 E. Harvest St. Mesa, AZ 85203 Mesa, AZ 85203 [email protected] [email protected] To: Team Captains, Special Program Managers and Advisors, and Team Coaches Greetings Varsity Scouts and Scout Leaders! You are about to participate in Varsity Scouting's most elevating activity for the year 2008. If you have planned right, you are about to have a mountain top experience that you will remember forever. It will help to culminate the last years’ worth of Team activities and will guide you and your Team through the upcoming year. I commend you for your choice to participate in Operation On Target this year. There are over 70 Teams participating in this year's activity. This is the biggest year ever for Arizona On Target! Team will be on Arizona peaks from Hayden Peak in the northwest to Mount Graham in the southeast. That will cover most of the state! Every Team should have ample opportunity to send and receive signals from several peaks. Please make every effort to be at your appointed location and be ready to go at 9:00 am. For some of you, that means a hike beginning at daybreak! Last year we had some Teams trying to make contact with Teams that had left early, so plan to stay until noon. Don’t forget to finish up with a “reflection”.
  • The Winter Season Provides the Public with Ism. However, the Absence Or

    The Winter Season Provides the Public with Ism. However, the Absence Or

    Possible Impacts of Snowmaking Using Reclaimed Water on Water Resources and Other Related Issues in Flagstaff, Arizona Item Type text; Proceedings Authors Leao, Duncan; Tecle, Aregai Publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science Journal Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest Rights Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Download date 24/09/2021 19:51:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/296600 POSSIBLE IMPACTS OF SNOWMAKING USING RECLAIMED WATER ON WATER RESOURCES AND OTHER RELATED ISSUES IN FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA Duncan Leao and Aregai Teclei The winter season provides the public with Although snowmaking can provide many bene- numerous outdoor recreational opportunities. Ski-fits to the economy of Flagstaff, several factors ing is a major activity that many people participate must be considered before implementing a snow- in and benefit from during the winter months. In making program. The objective of this paper is to addition to its recreational value, local businesses describe the requirements for snowmaking and its such as restaurants, hotels, and equipment rental potential impacts on regional water resources and shops all profit from winter recreation and tour- many other components of the ecosystem in the ski ism. However, the absence or interruption of area and downstream from it. In addition, some tourism due to insufficient snowfall seriously recommendations are made concerning the imple- affects many businesses. The recurring drought in mentation of snowmaking in the area. the Southwest, which produces insufficient snow- fall during winter, has become a problem that is SITE DESCRIPTION affecting many ski areas in the western United Arizona Snowbowl is located 14 miles north of States.
  • Preparations for Ski Season Begin at Snowbowl

    Preparations for Ski Season Begin at Snowbowl

    Preparations for ski season begin at Snowbowl by Jarrod Fay December 12, 2005 Located in the San Francisco lodge is just minutes outside of cathedral.'' On the other side of the Peaks in Flagstaff Arizona, Flagstaff. The Ski Lift Lodge and fence, J.R. Murray, general "Arizona's Snowbowl" is the Cabins offer a full-service manager of Arizona Snowbowl closest place for ERAU students to restaurant providing home-cooked states, "The most important issue have fun in the snow. Having meals for breakfast, lunch, and for us is the future of the ski area opened in 1938, Snowbowl is one dinner. Only 25 rooms are and that depends on being able to of the Nation's oldest ski resorts. It available, so make your make snow." Snowbowl creates a offers 2,300 feet of vertical drops, reservation far in advance. The lot of business for local 32 scenic trails, 4 chair lifts, a phone number for the lodge is organizations in Flagstaff, and the terrain park, 2 lodges, and an (928) 774-0729. Other hotels creation of snowmakers would average snowfall of 260 inches. available in Flagstaff are the Best make great ski seasons every Snowbowl is the ideal spot for any Western, Marriot, and Embassy year, thus helping out Flagstaff as snowboarder, skier, or sightseer to Suites to name a few. a whole. venture. Beginners will also feel at home at Snowbowl due to their Conditions vary greatly for Members of the Sierra Club, affordable ticket prices, over 50 Snowbowl. Last year was one of Center for Biological Diversity, acres of beginner runs, and the their best years ever, already Flagstaff Activist Network and The available lessons taught by having 44 inches of base snow by Navajo, White Mountain Apache, experienced staff.
  • Traditional Resource Use of the Flagstaff Area Monuments

    Traditional Resource Use of the Flagstaff Area Monuments

    TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TRADITIONAL RESOURCE USE OF THE FLAGSTAFF AREA MONUMENTS FINAL REPORT Prepared by Rebecca S. Toupal Richard W. Stoffle Shawn Kelly Jill Dumbauld with contributions by Nathan O’Meara Kathleen Van Vlack Fletcher Chmara-Huff Christopher Basaldu Prepared for The National Park Service Cooperative Agreement Number 1443CA1250-96-006 R.W. Stoffle and R.S. Toupal, Principal Investigators Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 86721 July 19, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER ONE: STUDY OVERVIEW ..................................................................................1 Project History and Purpose...........................................................................................1 Research Tasks...............................................................................................................1 Research Methods..........................................................................................................2 Organization of the Report.............................................................................................7
  • Four Corners Regional

    Four Corners Regional

    «¬96 ¤£191 ¤£40 «¬46 287 «¬79 UTAH ¬131 «¬9 ¤£6 40 ¤£ COLORADO«¬36 36 ¤£89 « «¬103 ¤£ ¨¦§225 ¤£ ¬264 «¬74 «¬132 « 70 177 «¬13 §¨¦ 6 «¬5 «¬ 1 Four Corners National Monument 117 ¤£ 1 Four«¬75 Corners«¬88 National«¬470 Monument «¬ 116 2 Hovenweep National Monument «¬78 «¬ 124 139 2 Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Four«¬ Corners«¬ Regional Map 9 3 Bluff Fort «¬ 3 «¬ 121Lowry¤£85 Pueblo 4 Valley of the Gods «¬31 4 Cortez 155 ¤£285 5 Goosenecks State Park 125 «¬ 5 Canyons of the Ancients Visitor Center «¬ 105 6 Goulding's Trading Post Museum «¬29 «¬91 6 Mesa«¬ Verde National Park 28 www.aztecnm.com 1-888-543-4629 7 La Plata Canyon 83 «¬86 7 The Dinosaur Museum «¬ «¬67 «¬ ¤£6 57 ¤£6 8 Durango - Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad 8 Edge of the Cedars State Park «¬ 330 ¤£50 «¬ 9 Chimney Rock National Monument 9 Natural Bridges National Monument ¤£50 )"15 «¬82 9 ¬64 «¬ 10 Pagosa Springs 10 Newspaper Rock State Park « ¤£6 ¤£6 65 133 ¤£24 11 Silverton «¬217 11 Canyonlands National Park (East«¬100 Entrance) «¬10 «¬ «¬ )"18 «¬6 «¬141 12 Ouray 12 Canyonlands«¬257 National Park (North Entrance) 13 Telluride «¬21 13 Hole in the Rock 14 Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park 14 Arches National Park §¨¦70 15 Dinosaur Journey¤£24 (Museum of Western«¬94 Colorado) 15 Dead Horse Point State Park133 119 16«¬67 Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve «¬ «¬ «¬9 «¬21 16 Goblin Valley State Park ¤£89 «¬128 «¬135 17 Little Wild Horse Canyon «¬141 115 «¬313 «¬348 «¬ 18 John Wesley Powell River History Museum «¬72 )"14 Colorado Scenic Byways )"17)"16
  • MTB Participant Manual

    MTB Participant Manual

    MTB Participant Manual Flagstaff to Grand Canyon Stagecoach Line 100-Mile Mountain Bike Race ____________________________________________ Flagstaff, Arizona September 19, 2020 6AM ____________________________________________ Presented by Babbitt Ranches Flagstaff to Grand Canyon 100 Table of Contents Race Management 3 Sponsors 4 Brief Course Description 5 Qualifying 5 Start Times 5 Time Limits & Cut-Off Requirements 5 Race Day Parking 6 Post-Race Transportation 6 Flagstaff, AZ 6 Tusayan, AZ 7 Travel 7 Accommodations 7 Race Weekend Weather 8 Our Partners 9 Awards 12 Race Weekend Agenda 13 Course Marking 14 Aid Stations 14 Race Mechanics 14 Drop Bags 15 Recommended Gear 16 Last Minute Supplies 16 Social Media 16 Aid Station Matrix: Distances, Relay Exchanges, and Services 17 Biker Rules 17 Crew Rules 19 Aid Station Driving Directions 21 Recommended Purchases 24 Detailed Course Description 25 ©2020 The Flagstaff to Grand Canyon Stagecoach Line races are conducted under special use permit of the Coconino and Kaibab National Forests. 2 Flagstaff to Grand Canyon 100 Race Management Race Director Ian Torrence Co-Race Director Emily Torrence Mountain Bike Co-Race Director Dana Ernst Medical Directors Eric True & Scott Bajer Coconino County Sheriff’s SAR Coordinator Bart Thompson Coconino Amateur Radio Club Coordinator Joe Hobart Timing & Tracking Run Flagstaff and UltraLive.net 3 Brief Event Description This mountain bike event begins a few miles north of Flagstaff, Arizona, near the intersection of Snowbowl Road and Route 180, and finishes in Tusayan, Arizona, the entrance of Grand Canyon National Park. A majority of the Stagecoach course follows the Arizona Trail and the historic Flagstaff to Grand Canyon Stagecoach Line route used by adventure seeking tourists between 1897 and 1901.
  • International Indian Treaty Council Information Office Administration Office 2940 16Th Street, Suite 305 456 N

    International Indian Treaty Council Information Office Administration Office 2940 16Th Street, Suite 305 456 N

    International Indian Treaty Council Information Office Administration Office 2940 16th Street, Suite 305 456 N. Alaska Street San Francisco, CA 94103-3664 Palmer, AK 99645 P | (415) 641-4482 P | (907) 745-4482 F | (415) 641-1298 F | (907) 745-4484 E | [email protected] E | [email protected] Tribes File Human rights Complaint on San Francisco Peaks Desecration August 24, 2011 The Havasupai Tribe, Klee Benally, an activist Dineh (Navajo) youth, and the International Indian Treaty Council, filed an Urgent Action / Early Warning Complaint with the United Nations (UN) CERD Committee, on the desecration of Sacred San Francisco Peaks, Arizona. The complaint, filed late Wednesday, August 17, 2011, focuses on recent actions by the Arizona Snowbowl’s clear-cutting of 40 acres of pristine forest and the laying of over 5 miles of a waste water pipeline in furtherance of a US Forest Service and City of Flagstaff project to spray artificial snow made of waste water effluent on San Francisco Peaks. On Thursday, August 18th, the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, in representation of 20 recognized Indian Tribes and Nations1 filed a letter asking that they also be named in the complaint as co-petitioners. The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, known internationally as the CERD Committee is charged with monitoring compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). The United States ratified the ICERD on 21 October 1994, and has an internationally legally binding obligation to respect and not violate the human rights recognized in the ICERD, and to ensure that it is not violated by third parties, including its agency the US Forest Service, the City of Flagstaff, and private interests such as the Arizona Snowbowl.
  • Navajo Tribal Utility Authority Was Created As a Tribal Department Under the Resources Division of the Navajo Tribe by Resolution of the Tribal Council on January 22

    Navajo Tribal Utility Authority Was Created As a Tribal Department Under the Resources Division of the Navajo Tribe by Resolution of the Tribal Council on January 22

    NavajoNavajoNavajo TribalTribalTribal UtilityUtilityUtility AuthorityAuthorityAuthority NavajoNavajoNavajo WindWindWind EnergyEnergyEnergy FeasibilityFeasibilityFeasibility StudyStudyStudy ononon thethethe NavajoNavajoNavajo NationNationNation Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy TRIBAL ENERGY PROGRAM 2007 Program Review Meeting Presented By: Larry Ahasteen Denver, Colorado Renewable Energy Specialist November 06, 2007 Utah 110110-- CommunityCommunity ChaptersChapters Arizona New Mexico NavajoNavajoNavajo NationNationNation 19591959-- Navajo Tribal Utility Authority was created as a tribal department under the Resources Division of the Navajo Tribe by resolution of the Tribal Council on January 22. NTUA office was established in Shiprock with 15 employees: the City of Farmington offered assistance in setting up the operations. My Hope is to provide a light in every Hogan ! Phillip W. (Vance) Vanderhoff, a non- Navajo, was named NTUA’s first 1960 General Manager Phillip W. (Vance) Vanderhoff An Enterprise of the Navajo Nation NAVAJONAVAJO TRIBALTRIBAL UTILITYUTILITY AUTHORITYAUTHORITY-- HISTORYHISTORY SUMMARYSUMMARY Navajo Nation Council created NTUA in 1959 to provide modern utility services to the Navajo people. NTUA operates under a Plan of Operation as a non-profit Tribal Enterprise charged with providing utility services at a reasonable rates to the public. NTUA is governed by a Management Board of (7) members ,to direct the operation of the Authority. The Board is appointed and confirmed by the Government Services Committee. The Board was granted certain powers thru Section 7 of Title 21 of the Navajo Nation Code. NavajoNavajo TribalTribal UtilityUtility AuthorityAuthority Mission Provide electric , natural gas , water , wastewater treatment , photovoltaic and related services at competitive rates while contributing to the economy of the Navajo Nation, consistent with the improvement of the health and welfare of the residents of the Navajo Nation and the employment of the Navajo people.