DOCSLIB.ORG

Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Page 1 Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Page 1 Of Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Response and Concern Status Report Generated: 6/22/2018 12:48 PM Project: Chetco Fire Salvage Project (53150) Comment Period: Other - 30-Day Comment and ESD Comment Period Period Dates: 4/16/2018 - 5/16/2018 and 5/18/2018 - 6/18/2018 Name Comment Text Response Text Comment # ESD Comments Received 5/18/2018 - 6/18/2018 Vaile, Joseph 1-2 An ESD may prove counterproductive to the goals of the agency, if it The Forest Service has been engaging the public in a robust and thorough process since the prevents meaningful mitigation measures to the proposed action. The Chetco Bar fire began. Refer also to the response to comment 1-1 for more information on use of the ESD may prevent the Forest Service from engaging the public design criteria and evaluation for feasibility. in a robust and thorough planning process that could be accomplished through an objection process. Page 1 of 341 Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Name Comment Text Response Text 1-5 Please note that the discussion of the agency's desire for an ESD at page The EA states "An additional consideration is the health and safety of forest visitors and 2-6 of the Chetco Bar Fire Salvage EA makes reference to a concern for nearby private landowners due to numerous dead trees, as well as Forest Service staff and "the health and safety of forest visitors." We wholeheartedly agree that forest industry workers working in the Chetco Bar Fire Salvage project area. Traveling or this is a legitimate concern. Yet, the roadside hazard tree projects working in forests where the majority of trees have been killed by fire is inherently addressing health and safety concerns have already been approved and dangerous. By delaying the sale date until late October of 2018 or later, there would be an are currently being implemented in the fire area. The pending ESD increased risk to forest visitors, nearby private landowners, Forest Service staff, timber request deals specifically with unit salvage logging, not with safe fallers and/or equipment operators in the project area. This is due to the ongoing ingress, or travel in the planning area. deterioration of snags because of increased defect, weathering agents, over-wintering, and other environmental factors. Snags that would be felled in the summer of 2018 for timber harvest would have fewer defects and provide less relative risk to forest workers." Additionally the ESD describes that "high densities of standing snag hazards would pose a safety risk to forest users, nearby private landowners, and fire fighters in the future. Snags can fall at any time, posing a continued threat to people working and recreating in the forest. Hazards to crews working to reforest burned areas and crews conducting future fire suppression are also a concern. While not all dead trees would be salvaged within the proposed units, safety hazards to work crews conducting tree planting and fire suppression would be substantially mitigated by salvage tree removal. Areas not treated along private land boundaries would leave high densities of standing snag hazards which could pose a safety risk to private land owners. Future fire starts may occur in the area and suppression activities would be dictated by the snag loading of the area and safety risks to fire fighters working in the area. Areas not treated along private land boundaries would increase these safety risks and make suppression activities along private land boundaries problematic in the future." 1-4 Specifically, we remain concerned with streamside protection and the The EA found that the action alternatives evaluated in Chapter 3 had no effect to critical need for input from the National Marine Fisheries Service to develop habitat for SONCC coho salmon. If no direct or indirect effects are anticipated from the meaningful avoidance and mitigation strategies. Our desire is to ensure action alternatives, then no cumulative effects can occur from the proposed activities. protection for clean water and salmonids. Likewise, we urge the Forest 1-1 We appreciate the Forest Service focusing some of the post fire logging Thank you for your comment, we understand your concerns. We are confident the proposed in this project in previously managed plantations and in areas evaluation for feasibility described in the EA, Chapter 1 and the design criteria described in outside of roadless areas. We also look forward to more management the EA, Appendix A for the project will minimize or avoid potential adverse effects of the in the Chetco watershed that focuses on watershed health and action alternatives. Page 2 of 341 Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Name Comment Text Response Text 1-3 With the ESD, we are concerned that the agency will be unable to All substantive comments raised during the scoping period and the 30-day comment period integrate site-specific, substantive concerns raised in the planning on the Draft EA have been addressed appropriately. In fact, the January 2018 scoping letter process into project layout and implementation. We hope that this is described the need to capture timber value in the matrix land allocations that experienced not the case, and stand ready to work with the Forest to address these 50-100 percent basal area loss, about 13,626 acres. The letter stated these areas would be concerns before a final decision is made. evaluated for feasibility of treatment and that the treatment acreage would be reduced further, due to a combination of factors. The evaluation for feasibility has been ongoing and has reduced acres to 4,090 due to removing inventoried roadless areas (IRA), removing units lacking economically viable products, logging systems operability and accessibility, locating and avoiding unmapped riparian reserves, and considerations for post-fire wildlife habitat and other resources. (EA at 1-1) Additionally, project specific design criteria have been developed to minimize or avoid potential adverse effects of the action alternatives. (EA, Appendix A) All applicable best management practices (BMPs) for watershed and vegetative management would be used to enable the achievement of water quality standards (General Water Quality Best Management Practices, Pacific Northwest Region, USDA Forest Service 2011). (EA at 2-7) 30-Day Comments Received 4/16/2018 - 5/16/2018 Avritt, Carrie 8-4 I understand that some logging may be necessary for safety reasons As of May 25, Oregon Department of Forestry has received notification of operations on such as along roads, but elsewhere the forest should be left alone, 6,421 acres from private land owners. The Draft EA at page 3-3 estimated private land especially in light of the thousands of acres of private lands nearby that salvage on about 9,455 acres for cumulative effects analysis. are already being clearcut. 8-3 If left alone, the post-fire landscape here will provide essential habitat The effects to northern spotted owl and coho salmon are displayed in the EA, Chapter 3 for imperiled wildlife like northern spotted owls and coho salmon -- two Fisheries and Aquatic Biota section. Specifically, the Proposed Action would likely adversely species that are barely hanging on. affect habitat and by disturbance, Alternative 3 would not likely adversely affect habitat but would likely adversely affect by disturbance. Both action alternatives would have no direct, indirect or cumulative effects to coho salmon. Refer to the EA, Chapter 3 Fisheries and Aquatic Biota section for the entire effects analysis. 8-1 I'm writing to urge you to reconsider your plan to log more than 4,000 The No Action alternative addresses your concerns. acres of public lands in the Chetco River region of the Rogue River- Siskiyou National Forest. Page 3 of 341 Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Name Comment Text Response Text Anthony, Hal 45-1 The logging will, as usual, simply create more fire danger in a time of The effects to fuel loads is described in the EA, Chapter 3 Fire, Fuels and Air Quality section. climate temperature change that is already, as you well know, more than devastating communities. Letting in more sunlight so a weensy few people make millions is wrong, and you kinow that. Fronce, Linnea 91-1 Birds and animals need dead trees for homes. And last time I read The purpose of the Chetco Bar Fire Salvage project is to capture timber value in the matrix about logging the fire ravaged areas in CA they were cutting down live land allocations by harvesting dead, dying and/or damaged trees resulting from the 2017 trees as well. Basically clear cutting everything. That doesn't sound like Chetco Bar fire. (EA at 1-4) Additionally, the No Action alternative addresses your concerns. safety measures. Anderson Kathleen 104-1 This is a treasured wild area. Let the recovery happen naturally. Logging The No Action alternative addresses your concerns. machinery disrupts the soil and recovery of the forest. Oliveria sheelagh 126-1 Clearcutting in Oregon is archaic and totally irresponsible. Foresters The effects to soils are described in the EA, Chapter 3 Soils section. say, "it comes back". It never comes back. This is pure ignorance. I am a botanist who pays attention. The forests on Mt Hood have at the most 3" of topsoil/duff as compared to 3' deep soils that were here before white people. You are damning your children to an earth without oxygen. perreault herve 147-1 I urge Forest Service decision makers to bring communities and The No action alternative addresses your concerns about " avoiding post-fire clearcut stakeholders together by avoiding post-fire clearcut logging and new logging and new road construction in the Chetco River Watershed ".
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chetco Bar BAER Specialist Reports
    Chetco Bar BAER Specialist Reports Burned Area Emergency Response Soil Resource Assessment Chetco Bar Fire OR-RSF-000326 Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest October 2017 Lizeth Ochoa – BAER Team Soil Scientist USFS, Rogue River-Siskiyou NF [email protected] Kit MacDonald – BAER Team Soil Scientist USFS, Coconino and Kaibab National Forests [email protected] 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Chetco Bar fire occurred on 191,197 acres on the Gold Beach and Wild Rivers Ranger District of the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, BLM lands, and other ownerships in southwestern Oregon. Approximately 170,321 acres of National Forest System (NFS) land, 6,746 acres of BLM land and 14,130 acres of private land were affected by this wildfire. Within the fire perimeter, approximately 14,012 acres burned at high soil burn severity, 64,545 acres burned at moderate soil burn severity, 76,613 acres burned at low soil burn severity, and 36,027 remain unburned. On NFS-managed lands, 10,684 acres burned at high soil burn severity, 58,784 acres burned at moderate soil burn severity, 70,201 acres burned at low soil burn severity and 30,642 acres remain unburned or burned at very low soil burn severity (Figure 1). The Chetco Bar fire burned area is characterized as steep, rugged terrain, with highly dissected slopes and narrow drainages. Dominant surficial geology is metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic rocks, peridotite and other igneous rocks. Peridotite has been transformed into serpentine through a process known as serpentinization. This transformation is the result of hydration and metamorphic transformation of ultramafic (high iron and magnesium) rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Chetco Bar Fire Timber Salvage Project
    United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Coos Bay District Myrtlewood Field Office 1300 Airport Lane Coos Bay, OR 97459 Categorical Exclusion Review Chetco Bar Fire Timber Salvage Project DOI-BLM-ORWA-C040-2018-0002-CX BLM Office: Myrtlewood Field Office Lease/Serial/Case No. : DOI-BLM-ORWA-C040-2018-0002-CX Proposed Action Title: Chetco Bar Fire Timber Salvage Project Location of Proposed Action: Township 39 South, Range 13 West, Sections 1, 2, 11, 13-15, 22, 23, 25-27, Willamette Meridian, Curry County, Oregon (see attached Map2 and Map3). Background Reported on July 12, 2017, the Chetco Bar Fire started in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness on U.S. Forest Service Land from lightning strikes. The fire burned within the 2002 Biscuit Fire and 1987 Silver Fire scars between Brookings, Oregon to the west and Cave Junction to the east. Winds pushed the fire southward towards Brookings and onto private and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) administered lands in Curry County. The fire burned on approximately 185,920 acres of which 6,501 acres are BLM-administered lands. The fire burned on steep slopes (elevations range from 3,420 ft. on ridge tops to 1,200 ft. in drainages) within two watersheds (North Fork Chetco River and South Fork Pistol River). The BLM assigned a Burn Area Emergency Response (BAER) team to BLM-Administered land effected by the Chetco Bar Fire. The BAER team created a Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC) map and field reviewed the area to create a soil burn severity (SBS) map. SBS maps identifies fire-induced changes in soil and ground surface properties that may affect infiltration, run-off, and erosion potential (Parsons et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse
    #714 CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse A SYNTHESIS OF CURRENT TRENDS AND FUTURE MANAGEMENT J. W. Connelly, S. T. Knick, C. E. Braun, W. L. Baker, E. A. Beever, T. Christiansen, K. E. Doherty, E. O. Garton, S. E. Hanser, D. H. Johnson, M. Leu, R. F. Miller, D. E. Naugle, S. J. Oyler-McCance, D. A. Pyke, K. P. Reese, M. A. Schroeder, S. J. Stiver, B. L. Walker, and M. J. Wisdom Abstract. Recent analyses of Greater Sage-Grouse very low densities in some areas, coupled with (Centrocercus urophasianus) populations indicate large areas of important sagebrush habitat that are substantial declines in many areas but relatively relatively unaffected by the human footprint, sug- stable populations in other portions of the species’ gest that Greater Sage-Grouse populations may be range. Sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats neces- able to persist into the future. We summarize the sary to support sage-grouse are being burned by status of sage-grouse populations and habitats, large wildfires, invaded by nonnative plants, and provide a synthesis of major threats and chal- developed for energy resources (gas, oil, and lenges to conservation of sage-grouse, and suggest wind). Management on public lands, which con- a roadmap to attaining conservation goals. tain 70% of sagebrush habitats, has changed over the last 30 years from large sagebrush control Key Words: Centrocercus urophasianus, Greater projects directed at enhancing livestock grazing to Sage-Grouse, habitats, management, populations, a greater emphasis on projects that often attempt restoration, sagebrush. to improve or restore ecological integrity. Never- theless, the mandate to manage public lands to Conservación del Greater Sage-Grouse: provide traditional consumptive uses as well as Una Síntesis de las Tendencias Actuales y del recreation and wilderness values is not likely to Manejo Futuro change in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Wild – Understanding Risks and Responses to Water Supplies from Wildfires
    TAMING THE WILD – UNDERSTANDING RISKS AND RESPONSES TO WATER SUPPLIES FROM WILDFIRES Glen Leverich 1 Rodrigo Prugue 2 2 0 19 P N WS - AWWA Conference, Vancouver, WA May 3, 2019 1 2 OUTLINE OF TALK Photo of City of Brookings, OR (courtesy of City of Brookings) OVERVIEW OF WILDFIRE ACTIVITY AND RISKS IN THE NORTHWEST Photo of Chetco Bar Fire (courtesy of USFS) Spatial frequency of recorded burn events in OR and WA: 1908–2017 Annual total acres burned in OR and WA: 1908–2018 Vancouver Chetco R. Source data: BLM, 2017 Source data: BLM, 2018 GIS analysis: Stillwater, 2018 Analysis: Stillwater, 2019 Conceptualization of sediment yield and associated vegetation and litter recovery • Wildfires can lead to during the fire-induced “window of accelerated rates of runoff disturbance” and erosion Increasing vegetation cover • Exposed, burned soils influence of erosion-limiting during storms are more factors litter cover susceptible to mass wasting and sediment- fire-induced sediment laden runoff—the Fire- yield Flood-Erosion sequence ‘background’ (Neary et al., 2005, USDA) E R I F sediment yield • “Window of disturbance” S E D I M E N T Y I E L D occurs for months to years window of disturbance until natural system T I M E recovers (Prosser and Adapted from Shakesby and Doerr, 2006, Williams, 1998, Hyd. Proc.) Earth Sci. Rev. Photo of burned area of Chetco watershed (Stillwater Sciences) Photo of Montecito Debris flows following Thomas Fire in Santa Barbara County, CA, Jan 2018 (photo courtesy of Scripps Institute) WILDFIRE EFFECTS TO DRINKING WATER SUPPLY Photo of burned area of Chetco watershed (Stillwater Sciences) WILDFIRE EFFECTS TO DRINKING WATER SUPPLY •Two-thirds of freshwater resources in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017
    Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017 DRAFT Oregon Department of Pacific Northwest Region Forestry Forest Health Protection Forest Health Program for the greatest good AGENDA ITEM 4 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 36 Forest Health Highlights in Oregon 2017 Joint publication contributors: Christine Buhl¹ Zack Heath² Sarah Navarro¹ Karen Ripley² Danny Norlander¹ Robert Schroeter² Wyatt Williams¹ Ben Smith² ¹Oregon Department of Forestry ²U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender Cooperative Aerial Survey: 2017 Flight lines DRAFT The aerial survey program is changing! Give us input to better serve your needs. Front cover image: Orange hawkweed (Hieracium aurantiacum), a European exotic, was first identified in Oregon in 2017 in Clatsop County (Photo by Peter Dziuk). AGENDA ITEM 4 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 36 Table of Contents SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................1 AERIAL AND GROUND SURVEYS .........................................................................................................2 ABIOTIC STRESSORS ...........................................................................................................................4 Climate and Weather ...................................................................................................................4 Drought .......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of the Big Trees
    Challenge of the Big Trees Challenge of the Big Trees CHALLENGE OF THE BIG TREES Lary M. Dilsaver and William C. Tweed ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association, Inc. CONTENTS NEXT >>> Challenge of the Big Trees ©1990, Sequoia Natural History Association dilsaver-tweed/index.htm — 12-Jul-2004 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/index.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:17 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) Challenge of the Big Trees Table of Contents COVER LIST OF MAPS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS FOREWORD PREFACE CHAPTER ONE: The Natural World of the Southern Sierra CHAPTER TWO: The Native Americans and the Land CHAPTER THREE: Exploration and Exploitation (1850-1885) CHAPTER FOUR: Parks and Forests: Protection Begins (1885-1916) CHAPTER FIVE: Selling Sequoia: The Early Park Service Years (1916-1931) CHAPTER SIX: Colonel John White and Preservation in Sequoia National Park (1931- 1947) CHAPTER SEVEN: Two Battles For Kings Canyon (1931-1947) CHAPTER EIGHT: Controlling Development: How Much is Too Much? (1947-1972) CHAPTER NINE: New Directions and A Second Century (1972-1990) APPENDIX A: Visitation Statistics, 1891-1988 APPENDIX B: Superintendents of Sequoia, General Grant, and Kings Canyon National Parks NOTES TO CHAPTERS PUBLISHED SOURCES ARCHIVAL RESOURCES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INDEX (omitted from online edition) ABOUT THE AUTHORS http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/dilsaver-tweed/contents.htm[7/2/2012 5:14:22 PM] Challenge of the Big Trees (Table of Contents) List of Maps 1. Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks and Vicinity 2. Important Place Names of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 3.
    [Show full text]
  • South Pole-Aitken Basin
    Feasibility Assessment of All Science Concepts within South Pole-Aitken Basin INTRODUCTION While most of the NRC 2007 Science Concepts can be investigated across the Moon, this chapter will focus on specifically how they can be addressed in the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). SPA is potentially the largest impact crater in the Solar System (Stuart-Alexander, 1978), and covers most of the central southern farside (see Fig. 8.1). SPA is both topographically and compositionally distinct from the rest of the Moon, as well as potentially being the oldest identifiable structure on the surface (e.g., Jolliff et al., 2003). Determining the age of SPA was explicitly cited by the National Research Council (2007) as their second priority out of 35 goals. A major finding of our study is that nearly all science goals can be addressed within SPA. As the lunar south pole has many engineering advantages over other locations (e.g., areas with enhanced illumination and little temperature variation, hydrogen deposits), it has been proposed as a site for a future human lunar outpost. If this were to be the case, SPA would be the closest major geologic feature, and thus the primary target for long-distance traverses from the outpost. Clark et al. (2008) described four long traverses from the center of SPA going to Olivine Hill (Pieters et al., 2001), Oppenheimer Basin, Mare Ingenii, and Schrödinger Basin, with a stop at the South Pole. This chapter will identify other potential sites for future exploration across SPA, highlighting sites with both great scientific potential and proximity to the lunar South Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIC IMPACTS: MS and IRONMENTAL P ONS Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch
    ANIC IMPACTS: MS AND IRONMENTAL P ONS APRIL 15 - APRIL 17, 1999 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, Germany Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch Ber. Polarforsch. 343 (1999) ISSN 01 76 - 5027 Preface .......3 Acknowledgements .......6 Program ....... 7 Abstracts P. Agrinier, A. Deutsch, U. Schäre and I. Martinez: On the kinetics of reaction of CO, with hot Ca0 during impact events: An experimental study. .11 L. Ainsaar and M. Semidor: Long-term effect of the Kärdl impact crater (Hiiumaa, Estonia) On the middle Ordovician carbonate sedimentation. ......13 N. Artemieva and V.Shuvalov: Shock zones on the ocean floor - Numerical simulations. ......16 H. Bahlburg and P. Claeys: Tsunami deposit or not: The problem of interpreting the siliciclastic K/T sections in northeastern Mexico. ......19 R. Coccioni, D. Basso, H. Brinkhuis, S. Galeotti, S. Gardin, S. Monechi, E. Morettini, M. Renard, S. Spezzaferri, and M. van der Hoeven: Environmental perturbation following a late Eocene impact event: Evidence from the Massignano Section, Italy. ......21 I von Dalwigk and J. Ormö Formation of resurge gullies at impacts at sea: the Lockne crater, Sweden. ......24 J. Ebbing, P. Janle, J, Koulouris and B. Milkereit: Palaeotopography of the Chicxulub impact crater and implications for oceanic craters. .25 V. Feldman and S.Kotelnikov: The methods of shock pressure estimation in impacted rocks. ......28 J.-A. Flores, F. J. Sierro and R. Gersonde: Calcareous plankton stratigraphies from the "Eltanin" asteroid impact area: Strategies for geological and paleoceanographic reconstruction. ......29 M.V.Gerasimov, Y. P. Dikov, 0 . I. Yakovlev and F.Wlotzka: Experimental investigation of the role of water in the impact vaporization chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Liberty'cargo Ship
    ‘LIBERTY’ CARGO SHIP FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies for KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: United States of America Manufacturers: Alabama Dry Dock Co, Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyards Inc, California Shipbuilding Corp, Delta Shipbuilding Co, J A Jones Construction Co (Brunswick), J A Jones Construction Co (Panama City), Kaiser Co, Marinship Corp, New England Shipbuilding Corp, North Carolina Shipbuilding Co, Oregon Shipbuilding Corp, Permanente Metals Co, St Johns River Shipbuilding Co, Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp, Todd Houston Shipbuilding Corp, Walsh-Kaiser Co. Major Variants: General cargo, tanker, collier, (modifications also boxed aircraft transport, tank transport, hospital ship, troopship). Role: Cargo transport, troop transport, hospital ship, repair ship. Operated by: United States of America, Great Britain, (small quantity also Norway, Belgium, Soviet Union, France, Greece, Netherlands and other nations). First Laid Down: 30th April 1941 Last Completed: 30th October 1945 Units: 2,711 ships laid down, 2,710 entered service. Released by WW2Ships.com USA OTHER SHIPS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE 'Liberty' Cargo Ship © James Davies Contents CONTENTS ‘Liberty’ Cargo Ship ...............................................................................................................1 Key Information .......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Readings in the History of the Soil Conservation Service
    United States Department of Agriculture Readings in the Soil Conservation Service History of the Soil Conservation Service Economics and Social Sciences Division, NHQ Historical Notes Number 1 Introduction The articles in this volume relate in one way or another to the history of the Soil Conservation Service. Collectively, the articles do not constitute a comprehensive history of SCS, but do give some sense of the breadth and diversity of SCS's missions and operations. They range from articles published in scholarly journals to items such as "Soil Conservation: A Historical Note," which has been distributed internally as a means of briefly explaining the administrative and legislative history of SCS. To answer reference requests I have made reprints of the published articles and periodically made copies of some of the unpublished items. Having the materials together in a volume is a very convenient way to satisfy these requests in a timely manner. Also, since some of these articles were distributed to SCS field offices, many new employees have joined the Service. I wanted to take the opportunity to reach them. SCS employees are the main audience. We have produced this volume in the rather unadorned and inexpensive manner so that we can distribute the volume widely and have it available for training sessions and other purposes. Also we can readily add articles in the future. If anyone should wish to quote or cite any of the published articles, please use the citations provided at the beginning of the article. For other articles please cite this publication. Steven Phillips, a graduate student in history at Georgetown University and a 1992 summer intern here with SCS, converted the articles to this uniform format, and is hereby thanked for his very professional efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Chetco Bar Fire Timber Salvage
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Coos Bay District Office 1300 Airport Lane, North Bend, OR 97459 Web Address: http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/coosbay E-mail: [email protected] 1792/5400 (ORC040) DOI-BLM-ORWA-C040-2018-0002-CX Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Scoping Document Dear Citizen: The Coos Bay District Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Myrtlewood Field Office is in the process of planning the salvage of dead or dying trees that burned in the Chetco Bar Fire earlier this year. Reported on July 12, 2017, the Chetco Bar Fire started in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness on U.S. Forest Service Land from lightning strikes. The fire burned within the 2002 Biscuit Fire and 1987 Silver Fire scars between Brookings, Oregon on the west and Cave Junction on the east. Winds pushed the fire southward towards Brookings and onto private and BLM administered lands in Curry County. The fire burned on approximately 185,920 acres of which 6,501 acres are BLM administered lands. The fire burned on steep slopes (elevations range from 3420 ft. on ridge tops to 1200 ft. in drainages) within two watersheds (North Fork Chetco River and South Fork Pistol River). A Burned Area Emergency Response Team (BAER) produced a Burned Area Reflectance Classification (BARC) map and field reviewed it to create a soil burn severity map. Soil Burn Severity (SBS) acres for BLM administered lands equated to 2,143.65 acres (High SBS), 1,227.02 acres (Moderate SBS), 992.81 acres (Low SBS), and 2,136.97 acres unburned.
    [Show full text]
  • Chetco Bar Fire Executive Summary………………….……………………………….16
    Facilitated Learning Analysis Packer’s Cabin Serious Near Miss “I was afraid we were going to come back to burnt engines and tinfoil on the ground.” Helicopter Co-Pilot 1 Contents The Story .................................................................................................. 3 Packer's Cabin Timeline………………………………………………………………………..8 What Went Right ...................................................................................... 9 Lessons Learned By Participants ............................................................ 10 Areas of Further Inquiry…………………………………….……………………………….11 FLA Team Members…………………………………………………………..……………….15 Chetco Bar Fire Executive Summary………………….……………………………….16 To protect the privacy of the individuals involved in this incident, all names are fictional. Structure prep at Packer's Cabin. 2 The Story “Do you see any good deployment sites?” Engine Boss “Nothing is adequate for a deployment site.” Helicopter Pilot The situation deteriorated very quickly once the wind changed directions and ignited spots across the road. Everyone’s eyes were shedding tears and their lungs were burning due to the highly irritating tan oak smoke. Everything seemed fine until there was fire over the road in both directions. The engine and crew were cut off. The helicopter pilot said to get out of the area, but there were no good options for leaving. On July 12 a lightning started wildfire was reported in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness on the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest in Oregon. That fire was named the Chetco Bar Fire. Initial attack was unsuccessful due to steep terrain and dense foliage with no safety zones. Over the next month, the fire slowly grew while fire indices rose. The Forest requested and received severity money from the region to increase firefighter resource staffing in order to help with what looked like an intense fire season.
    [Show full text]