DOCSLIB.ORG

Politecnico Di Torino

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Politecnico Di Torino POLITECNICO DI TORINO Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Engineering Management Tesi di Laurea Magistrale Analyzing the market statement of airplane industry Academic Supervisor Candidate Prof. Luigi Benfratello Fatemeh Morovati March 2020 i ii Acknowledgement With due respect, I would like to take opportunity of expressing my sincere gratitude to Professor Luigi Benfratello, my supervisor, for his continuous support, patient guidance and motivation. I also place on record my sincere thanks to my family specially my parents who are playing the most important role in my life and also my friends here in Politecnico di Torino who has given me full co-operation through this master studies. i Abstract The universal market of Commercial Aircraft is of the most major markets in all around the world and there are a lot of papers which are discussing about this subject because of importance of it. This thesis structured around the commercial airplanes which is one of the most important segments in the aerospace industry. This thesis documents in three chapters which includes the introduction which is about the history of emerging airplanes and commercial airplanes and the technology change and the innovation in this industry and then the factors of competition and the market of commercial aircraft and also it shows the application of Michael porter's 5-Force model. Then in the second chapter, it describes the major players in the industry in all over the world which is describing in two parts, major players in the industry and the new entrants in the industry. After all in the third and the last chapter as both Airbus and Boeing have functional product differentiation when it comes to their air-crafts. The Airbus and the Boeing are examples of two companies offering different products based on their vision for the future,and each aircraft is worth billions of dollars. Therefore this report it shows every detail about the existing duopoly between Boeing and Airbus who are dominating the market and at the end we can see the Future outlook of global commercial aircraft manufacturing and the conclusion. ii Contents Acknowledgement....................................................................................................................... i Abstract....................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures............................................................................................................................. vi List of Tables..............................................................................................................................vii CHAPTER 1 Brief introduction of the World Airplanes and Airlines history and market and Commercial Airplane manufacturing industry and Technical Change in the Commercial Aircraft Industry..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 History of airplanes and how it changed world history ...................................... 1 1.1.1 Timeline of commercial aviation and strategic turning points.................... 1 1.2 Market of commercial aircraft.............................................................................8 1.2.1 Commercial Airplane Market Outlook 2019 – 2038..................................... 8 1.2.2 Market Drivers.............................................................................................12 1.3 Technical Change and the development of industry structure in the Commercial Aircraft Industry...................................................................................14 1.3.1 ABSTRACT.................................................................................................... 14 1.3.2 Analysis of Technological Innovation and Environmental Performance Improvement in Aviation Sector.......................................................................... 15 1.4 Application of Michael porter's 5-Force Model................................................. 21 1.5 How competitive is this industry?......................................................................26 1.6 Does it meet the requirement of a global industry?..........................................30 1.7 Future outlook of Global Commercial Aircraft Manufacturing..........................31 CHAPTER 2 Major Players in the industry in all over the world.............................................. 33 iii 2.1. World's Top 5 Commercial Aircraft OEMs - Airbus SA, Boeing, Bombardier, Embraer SA, ATR.......................................................................................................33 2.2 Major Players in the Industry.............................................................................35 2.2.1 Boeing..........................................................................................................35 2.2.2 Airbus (Commercial Aircraft).......................................................................36 2.2.3 Bombardier..................................................................................................38 2.2.4 Embraer.......................................................................................................39 2.2.5 ATR.............................................................................................................. 41 2.3 New Entrants in the Industry............................................................................. 42 2.3.1 United Aircraft Corporation........................................................................ 42 2.3.2 COMAC........................................................................................................ 43 2.4 Top industry issues and what companies are doing or can do..........................46 CHAPTER 3 Analyzing the duopoly between Airbus and Boeing..............................................49 3.1. Competing products..........................................................................................49 3.1.1. Passenger capacity and range comparison................................................49 3.1.2. Cargo capacity and range comparison.......................................................52 3.1.3. Airbus A320 vs Boeing 737.........................................................................52 3.1.4. Twin aisles.................................................................................................. 54 3.1.5. Airbus A380 vs Boeing 747.........................................................................54 3.1.6. EADS/Northrop Grumman KC-45A vs Boeing KC-767................................56 3.1.7. Small narrow-bodies.................................................................................. 56 iv 3.2. Modes of competition.......................................................................................57 3.2.1. Outsourcing................................................................................................ 57 3.2.2. Technology................................................................................................. 58 3.2.3. Engine choices............................................................................................58 3.2.4. Currency and exchange rates.....................................................................59 3.2.5. Safety and quality.......................................................................................59 3.2.6. Aircraft prices............................................................................................. 60 3.3. Effect of competition on product plans............................................................ 64 3.4. Orders and deliveries........................................................................................ 65 3.5 Controversies......................................................................................................67 3.5.1 Subsidies......................................................................................................67 3.5.2 World Trade Organization litigation............................................................68 3.5.3 Proposed tariffs...........................................................................................71 3.6 Conclusion.......................................................................................................... 72 v List of Figures Figure 1 : Global Overview of commercial Airplane Market Outlook............................9 Figure 2 : 44,040 deliveries............................................................................................ 9 Figure 3 : 3.4% Fleet Growth........................................................................................10 Figure 4 : 4.6% Traffic Growth......................................................................................10 Figure 5 : 2.7% GDP Growth.........................................................................................11 Figure 6 : $6,810B Market Value..................................................................................11 Figure 7 : 4.1% Service Market Growth....................................................................... 12 Figure 8 : $9,100B Services Market Value...................................................................12 Figure 9 : Five Force Model Framework......................................................................22 Figure 10 : Aircraft Demand by region forecast and by size........................................ 31 Figure 11 : Regional Traffic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Banning Collection Donated to PAHF — Edward Trippe
    Spring 2021 www.panam.org NEWSLETTERCLI OF THEPP PAN AMER HISTORICAL FOUNDATION From The Chairman, Gene Banning Collection Donated to PAHF — Edward Trippe... Volunteers Help Retrieve, Catalogue and Preserve Historic Materials By Doug Miller his story goes back decades to a Ttime when a new Pan Am pilot named Gene Banning became fascinated with the growing empire of Pan Ameri- can World Airways. His interest soon grew into a studied pursuit and then a life-long passion. The COVID-19 virus has stressed us all, but as I write this letter, Spring and Fast forward decades, to the 1990’s. Now a return to normal life are both in sight. retired, Captain Banning had amassed I hope that our extended PAHF fam- a trove of historic Pan Am materials, ily and friends have survived and are not only his own but those of colleagues such as George Price, Bill Seeman and healthy. As we look ahead, and I know Capt. Banning, courtesy Univ. of Miami I speak for many, we will be happy others. The material in his collection Special Collections to turn the page and return to some was instrumental in helping Banning to author what has become one of the very from Mrs. Banning’s residence. The col- semblance of normalcy — whatever the lection was temporarily stored in a space ‘new norm’ is for each of us. best books ever written about “the world’s most experienced airline”: ‘The Airlines of at the AWARE store in Miami. Remembering Stephen Lyons, Pan American Since 1927’. (Paladwr Press; When it was time to downsize AWARE’s Producer for Across the Pacific Maclean, VA; 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Classifications, History and Airport Technology Problem 2
    CEE 4674: Airport Planning and Design Spring 2007 Assignment 1: Aircraft Classifications, History and Airport Technology Date Due: Jan/23/2008 Instructor: Trani Problem 2 Read pages 1 and 2 in Chapter 1 in the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 (Airport Design) before answering this question. Also, read the aircraft classification handout provided in class. Examine the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 (Airport Design). Specifically examine Appendix 13 of the FAA Advisory Circular which contains information about various aircraft. a) For the aircraft shown in Table 2.1, state the Airplane Design Group (ADG) class, the Terminal Areas Procedures Aircraft Speed Category, and the wake vortex class for each vehicle. b) For each aircraft, calculate the stalling speed (minimum speed for flight) from the known aircraft approach speeds published in the FAA AC. Stalling speed is just 30% below the approach speed. Table 2.1 Aircraft to be Studied. Aircraft ADG and Speed Classification British Aerospace BAe 146-300 C-III Beech Raytheon Bonanza B36TC A-I Airbus A-320-100 C-III Gulfstream G-IV D-II Boeing 777-300 D-V Boeing 747-400 D-V Boeing 737-500 C-III Beech Airliner 1900-C B-II British Aerospace BAe Jetstream 31 B-II Dassault Falcon FAL-900 B-II Cessna Citation I B-II Bombardier DHC-8 Dash 8-300 B-III Hawker HS 125 Series 700 C-I Bombardier CRJ/200 or Canadair CL-600 B-II Cessna 150 A-I McDonnell Douglas MDC-DC-9-82 C-III CEE 4674 A1 Trani Page 1 of 3 c) Match the names with the 2-D drawings (use the number of the aircraft and match by writing on the space to the right of each aircraft).
    [Show full text]
  • The Restructuring of Berlin's Airport System and the City's Position In
    Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Authors: Heike C. Alberts Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 7109 Fax: (920) 424 0292 Email: [email protected] John T. Bowen, Jr. Department of Geography and Urban Planning University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh 800 Algoma Boulevard Oshkosh, WI 54901 Tel: (920) 424 4103 Email: [email protected] Julie L. Cidell Department of Geography and Environmental Studies California State University San Bernadino 5500 University Parkway, SB 327 San Bernadino, CA 92407 Tel: (909) 538 3777 [email protected] 1 Missed Opportunities: The Restructuring of Berlin’s Airport System and the City’s Position in International Airline Networks Abstract After its history as a divided city, Berlin was expected to become a major world city following reunification. While the city has grown in terms of investment and social capital, it has not attained the preeminent status on the global stage that was expected. One important reason for this is that Berlin remains no more than a secondary hub in the global airline industry. In this article, we measure the city’s importance in airline networks at four points from 1989 to 2006. We then explain the city’s stature in those networks today as a product of both larger forces in the airline industry and circumstances more specific to Berlin. The former include liberalization and the development of airline alliances. In Berlin, meanwhile, the fractured airport system, which the city inherited from the Cold War, has been an obstacle to Berlin’s aspirations for centrality in the airline industry.
    [Show full text]
  • NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD Title PAGE
    SA-424 FILE NO. 1-0002 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WESTERN AIR LINES, INC. BOEING 720-047B,N3166 ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA MARCH 31, 1971 ADOPTED: JUNE 7, 1972 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 REPORT NUMBER: NTSB-AAR-72-18 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TiTLE PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-72-18 I. Title and Subtitle 5.Report Date Aircraft Accident Report - Western Air Lines, InC., Sune 7, 1972 Roeing 720-047B, N3166, Ontario International Airport, 6.Performing Organization Ontario. California, March 31, 1971 Code '. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. I. Performing Organization Name and Address IO.Work Unit No. Bureau of Aviation Safety 11 .Contract or Grant No. National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D. C. 20591 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report March 31, 1971 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, 0. C. 20591 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes I6.Abstract Flight 366, a Boeing 720B, on a proficiency check flight, yawed and rolled out of control, and crashed while in the process of executing a 3-engine missed- approach from a simulated engine-out ILS instrument approach. The five crew- members and only occupants died in the crash. The weather conditions at Ontario were 600 feet overcast, with 3/4-mile visibility in fog, haze, and smoke. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the aircraft rudder hydraulic actuator support fitting. The failure of the fitting resulted in the inapparent loss Of left rudder control which, under the conditions of this flight, precluded the pilotk ability to maintain directional control during a simlated engine-out missed- approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntsb/Aas-64-Aa
    , I (j (. .1 u!) \J _l'·,· ~ABLE OF CONTENTS A. INT~ODUCTION 1 . Rcvie1-1 u f in;1'tents 2. T11,pl·:::r:cn ta ti on of Requirements b., Re.so luUoI~ of Conflicts c <· Consider a t,iorJ rif Avc:.ilable Research J, Considerat icn of Past Di.fficultie:3 et Aircraft CcckFits Accide~i/Incia2nt Re2ord 6 Conclusions C .. CREd COMP.LEHZ!~T l.. Review of 11.eq1.iirements ;::i, Views of the Industry a. Ma~uf2cturers ~~ Air Carriers c. 1·'!.:.:Uu.:·:J.l Avi at.ion Agency cL. .Pilot Organization e., Flisht Eng:inc:er Organization h. Conclusions .D. cnn·.r DUTIE.S 1. Review of ~equirements 2. Views of the Industry a. Manufacturers b .. Air Carriers c. FBricral Aviation Agency d, Military e, Flight Engi.near On.;..n] za ti on f. Pilot Organization 000002 Evalua 1:.ion Conclusions I l. e.. Fi..-:.. J.\.FI?ENDI CES II. TJ, S. J.._i-:: C:::.2'.'rie~ l~:.r..:i.Je'."'_t.s f'::.r 1J 1~riod cfo.:,.;:-::1v .July =...> ~964 - 'L-;_:rbcjet Aircr:;.ft J.11' r.·;.:;:: ~·=-:·:~-= B·::a_-l.:'..::::"~'.:':":. ~Tr: s -:~:; te1--,lis:-~:::d by BAC-ll.~. n:.:;. 9 E\r~.:il·;,s.T ~.or, Com~tr~:.t-_:.se- ::i.s p:cs.:_::,s~1ted by ..L;n~ pj_j_ot Org~r.. iz:-.. -.·. .ior; IV. Limi t:a·:::i..c:".::: f::i::.· T:·-cr:.1.::;por r:: Ai:t-::::.a.f~ Op.:::::-·:;.-:-.~~::.·":; w:i rh 1.;.r:..> '.!V:"':L!."1 crew ~L: p~~0:etJ.t:::l ty ~~1E: Fligl1t E11ginc('=Y O:t;ar,j_zg.-,l..Jn v.
    [Show full text]
  • KFP067 22Gb.Pdf
    , , , " beginning as "The Boe ing Clipper". the opment of Model 294, the Air Corps "Pro­ word was not a Boeing model name like ject X" that was to become the XB-15, "Flying Fortress" (Model 299) or "Strat­ the Model 299 that was the ill-fated proto­ oliner" (Model 307). The word "Clipper", type of the B-17, and was cu rrently con­ made famous by the famous line of fast, tinuing XB-15 work and redesigning the square-rigged sailing ships developed by B-17 for production when the Pan Am re­ Donald McKay in the late 1840s, was ac­ quest was received on February 28, 1936. tually owned by Pan Ameri ca n. After ap­ With so much already in the works, it wa s The Boeing 314 Clipper was a marvelous machine plying it as part of the names on individ­ felt that the company couldn't divert the even by today's standards. She was big, comfort· ual airplanes, as "China Clipper", "Clip­ engineering manpower needed for still a­ able and very dependable. At 84,000 Ibs. gross per America", etc., the airline got a copy­ nother big project. weight, with 10 degrees of flap and no wind, she right on the word and subsequently be­ The deadline for response had passed used 3,200 ft. to take off, leaving the water in 47 came very possessive over its use. I t is re­ when Wellwood E. Beall, an engineer di­ seconds. At 70,000 Ibs. with 20 degrees of flap ported to have had injuncions issued verted to sa les and service work , returned and a30 knot headwind, she was off in just 240 h., against Packard for use of the work " Clip­ from a trip to Ch ina to deliver 10 Boeing leaving the water in only eight seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Design Was Modeled More Closely After It
    Aircraft Final Project GD3-200 Prepared by: Group 3 Tian Chen. Quoc Tran . Oge Onuoha. Tony Haughton. Jean-Etienne Dongmo. Introduction The GD3-200 is a twin engine, new technology jet airplane designed for low fuel burn and short-to-medium range operations. This airplane uses new aerodynamics, advanced composite materials, structures, and systems to fill market requirement that cannot be efficiently provided by existing equipment or derivatives. The GD3-200 will provide airlines with unmatched fuel efficiency. The airplane will use 20 percent less fuel for comparable missions than any other airplane in its class. The key to this exceptional performance lies in the use of advanced composite materials for the majority of the airplane’s fuselage and wing structure. GD3 has also enlisted General Electric to develop engines for the new airplane. The GD3-200 is a highly fuel efficient low-noise airplane powered by General Electric new GEnx CF6-6 engines. These 9.5 to 1 high-bypass-ratio engines are reliable and easy to maintain. Using GEnx derived technology means these engines bring an average 15 percent improvement in specific fuel consumption over all other engines in its class. In the passenger configuration, the GD3-200 can typically carry 186 passengers (200 including crew) in a six-abreast, mixed class configuration over a 3000 mile range with full load. The GD3-200 can be equipped for Extended Range Operations (EROPS) to allow extended over-water operations. Changes include a backup hydraulic motor-generator set and an auxiliary fan for equipment cooling. Mission Requirement Payload: -200 passengers/crew at 200 lb each (includes baggage) 40000lb -5000 lb Cruise: 0.8 Mach at 33000 ft Cruise Range: 3000 miles Cruise Altitude: 33,000 ft Loiter: 30 minutes at 0.8 m Mach at 33000 ft Climb: Initial climb to cruise altitude starting at maximum takeoff weight Take-off distance: 5000 to 6000 ft with 50 ft clearance at sea level and standard conditions at maximum takeoff weight Power plant: more than 1; high-by-pass turbofan; choose from existing ones.
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019
    Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2020 & beyond 05 Accidents in 2019 07 2020 & beyond 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2019-2038 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Impact of technology on aviation safety 14 Technology has improved aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2019 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft annual analysis of aviation accidents, is a low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2019, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastwatcher
    AEROSPACE CURRENT EVENTS Missions for Airships are Back America Semper vigilans! The US army has announced that it will deploy an Semper volans! airship designed to provide early warning of a cruise missile attack on the northeastern United States. The system will undergo a two year test to determine its efficacy. The Coastwatcher The new system is called Joint Land Attack Publication of the Thames River Composite Squadron Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor Connecticut Wing System (Jlens) and has cost $2.8 million to Civil Air Patrol develop the prototype. 300 Tower Rd., Groton, CT http://ct075.org . LtCol Stephen Rocketto, Editor [email protected] C/CMSgt Virginia Poe, Scribe C/SMSgt Michael Hollingsworth, Printer's Devil Lt David Meers & Maj Roy Bourque, Papparazis Vol. IX 9.01 07 January, 2015 Jlens and its Mobile Mooring Station During Testing in Utah. (Credit: US Army) SCHEDULE OF COMING EVENT A Jlens system consists of two tethered aerostats 06 JAN-TRCS Staff Meeting which are 243 long and filled with a mixture of 07 JAN-CTWG Commander's Call helium and air. The test aerostats will float at 13 JAN-TRCS Meeting-Commander’s Call 10,000 feet near the Army's Aberdeen Proving 20 JAN-TRCS Meeting Grounds in Maryland. This will provide coverage 21 JAN-CTWG Staff Call over a 340 mile circle. 27 JAN-TRCS Meeting 31 JAN-01 FEB-CLC@Bridgeport One aerostat carries the surveillance radar and the second vehicle bears a fire control radar. The information will be sent to the North American SQUADRON STAFF MEETINGS Air Defense Command which will compare it 06 January, 2015 with data received from the Federal Aviation Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Design of a Short Takeoff and Landing Regional Jet Airliner
    A Conceptual Design of a Short Takeoff and Landing Regional Jet Airliner Andrew S. Hahn 1 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681 Most jet airliner conceptual designs adhere to conventional takeoff and landing performance. Given this predominance, takeoff and landing performance has not been critical, since it has not been an active constraint in the design. Given that the demand for air travel is projected to increase dramatically, there is interest in operational concepts, such as Metroplex operations that seek to unload the major hub airports by using underutilized surrounding regional airports, as well as using underutilized runways at the major hub airports. Both of these operations require shorter takeoff and landing performance than is currently available for airliners of approximately 100-passenger capacity. This study examines the issues of modeling performance in this now critical flight regime as well as the impact of progressively reducing takeoff and landing field length requirements on the aircraft’s characteristics. Nomenclature CTOL = conventional takeoff and landing FAA = Federal Aviation Administration FAR = Federal Aviation Regulation RJ = regional jet STOL = short takeoff and landing UCD = three-dimensional Weissinger lifting line aerodynamics program I. Introduction EMAND for air travel over the next fifty to D seventy-five years has been projected to be as high as three times that of today. Given that the major airport hubs are already congested, and that the ability to increase capacity at these airports by building more full- size runways is limited, unconventional solutions are being considered to accommodate the projected increased demand. Two possible solutions being considered are: Metroplex operations, and using existing underutilized runways at the major hub airports.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Robert Van Der Linden CV
    Curriculum Vitae F. Robert van der Linden Aeronautics Department National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] 202-633-2647 (Office) Education Ph.D. (Modern American, Business and Military History) The George Washington University. 1997. M.A. (American and Russian History) The George Washington University. 1981. B.A. (History) University of Denver, 1977. Member Phi Beta Kappa Present Position Curator of Air Transportation and Special Purpose Aircraft, Aeronautics Division, National Air and Space Museum (NASM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Primary Responsibilities Research and Writing Currently at work on "The Struggle for the Long-Range Heavy Bomber: The United States Army air Corps, 1934-1939. This book examines the fight between the Army Air Corps, the Army, and the Navy over the introduction of a new generation of long-range heavy bombers during the interwar period. Questions of cost, of departmental responsibility, and of the relationship between business and industry, all play key roles in the search for this elusive aircraft and ultimately which military branch controls the air. Underlying all of these issues is the question of whether or not the United States needs a separate, independent air force. Also researching a book on the creation of Transcontinental & Western Air (TWA). This business history will trace the story of this important airline from its creation in 1930 from the ambitious but unprofitable Transcontinental Air Transport, formed by Clement Keys with technical assistance from Charles Lindbergh, and parts for the successful Western Air Express of Harris Hanshue through World War II and its reorganization as Trans World Airlines under Howard Hughes.
    [Show full text]