DOCSLIB.ORG

Arthropod Pest Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-56787-9 - An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control J. R. M. Thacker Index More information Arthropod pest index Acyrthosiphum pisum, 213 Cochliomyia macellaria, 198 Adoxophyces orana, 153, 161, 165 Contrachelus nenuphar, 150 Aedes aegypti, 37, 45 Cosmopolites sordidus, 161 Aedes scutellaris, 192 Costelytra zealandica, 137, 138 Aedes spp., 288 Culex pipiens,37 Anagrapha falcifera, 153 Culex quinquefasciatus, 192, 204 Anarsia lineatella, 161 Culex spp., 142, 175 Anastrepha ludens, 204 Cyclas formicarius, 150 Anopheles albimanus, 151 Cydia funebrana, 161 Anopheles arabiensis, 192 Cydia nigricana, 161 Anopheles gambiae, 192 Cydia pomonella, 7, 100, 153, 161, 170, 204, 262 Anopheles ludens, 204 Dacus curcurbitae, 161, 204 Anopheles melas, 192 Dacus dorsalis, 204 Anopheles spp., 37, 100 Dacus oleae, 204 Anthonomus grandis, 7, 100, 161, 204 Dacus tryoni, 204 Anthonomus pomorum, 263 Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, 221 Anticarsia gemmetalis, 153, 155, 232 Delia antiqua, 204 Aphis gossypii, 100 Dendroctonus brevicomis, 172 Aphis spp., 267 Dendroctonus frontalis, 161 Archips podana, 263 Dendroctonus ponderosae, 161 Argyrotaenia spp., 260 Dendroctonus pseudotsuga, 161 Atherigona soccata, 236 Dendroctonus rufipennis, 161 Autographa californica, 153 Dermataphagoides spp., 45 Bactrocera oleae, 161 Diabrotica spp., 234, 299 Bemisia spp., 267 Diabrotica virgifera, 215 Bemisia tabaci, 100, 101, 102 Dikrella cruentata, 238 Carposina niponensis, 161 Diuraphis noxia,7 Cephus cinctus, 232 Drosophila melanogaster, 286 Ceratitis capitata, 7, 161, 178, 191, 201, 204, 237, Drosophila spp., 287 colour plate Dyocoetes confusus, 162 Chaeborus astictopus, 100 Dysaphis plantaginea, 262 Chilo suppressalis, 100, 161, 264 Elatobium abietinum, 213 Chrysodeixus spp., 267 Empoasca fabae, 20, 235 Clepsis spectrana, 164 Empoasca spp., 209, 225 Cochliomyia hominivorax, 23, 191, 193, 197, 200, 204, Eotetranychus willametti, 216 colour plate Ephestia elutella, 182 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-56787-9 - An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control J. R. M. Thacker Index More information 334 Arthropod pest index Ephestia kuehniella, 138 Operophthora brumata, 119 Eriosma lanigerum, 209 Oryctes rhinoceros, 136, 155, 162 Erythroneura elegantula, 130 Orygia pseudotsugata, 152, 153 Eucosma gloriola, 162 Oryzaephilus surinamensis, 183 Eupoecilia ambiguella, 162, 204 Ostrinia nubilalis, 7, 20, 162, 223 Frankliniella occidentalis, 100 Oulema melanoplus,7,232 Glossina austeni, 202 Panonychus citri, 100 Glossina mortisans, 191 Panonychus ulmi, 100, 263 Glossina palpalis, 202, 204 Papaipema nebris, 231, 232 Glossina spp., 191, 202, colour plate Pectinophora gossypiella, 7, 162, 173, 204, 231, 235 Glossina swynnertoni, 191 Phenacoccus manihoti, 123 Graphognathus leucoloma, 234 Phylloxera vitifoliae, 209, 221, 233 Graphognathus peregrinus, 234 Pieris brassicae,45 Grapholitha molesta, 162 Pieris rapae,7 Helicoverpa spp., 100, 153 Pityogenes chalcographus, 162 Helicoverpa zea, 101, 150, 153, 155, 225 Platynota idaeusalis, 162 Heliothis spp., 100, 153, 225, 232 Platyptilia carduidactyla, 162, 164 Heliothis subflexa, 192 Plutella xylostella, 100, 162, 292 Heliothis virescens, 162, 192 Popilla japonica, 142, 162 Homona magnanima, 162 Prays citri, 171, 163 Hypera postica,20 Prays oleae, 163 Icerya purchasi, 7, 23, 123 Rhagoletis cerasi, 175, 204 Ips paraconfusus, 172 Rhagoletis pomonella, 175 Ips sexdantatus, 162 Rhopalosiphum padi, 235 Ips typographus, 162 Rhyacionia buoliana, 163 Keiferia lycopersicella, 162 Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, 163 Lacanobia spp., 267 Rhynchophorus palmarum, 163 Lasioderma serricorne, 182, 193 Rhyzopertha dominica, 182 Leptinotarsa decemlineata, 138, 266 Sanninoidea exitiosa, 163 Liriomyza spp., 267 Schistocerca gregaria,65 Liriomyza trifolii, 265 Scolytus multistriatus, 163 Lissorhopterus oryzophilus, 235 Sitophilus granarius, 183 Lobesia botrana, 162 Sitophilus oryzae, 183 Lygus hesperus, 234 Spodoptera exigua, 153, 163 Lymantria dispar, 7, 153, 162, 164 Spodoptera frugiperda, 163, 220, 287 Macrosiphum spp., 267 Spodoptera spp., 100, 175, 264, 267 Mamestra brassicae, 153 Stomoxys calcitrans, 204 Mamestra configurata, 153 Synagrapha falcifera, 153 Mayetiola destructor, 207, 209 Synanthedon hector, 163 Melanagromyza obtuse, 216 Synanthedon myopaeformis, 163 Melanophis sacchari, 213 Synanthedon pictipes, 163 Melanoplus spp., 209 Synanthedon tipuliformis, 163 Meloidogyne spp., 267 Tenebrio molitor,37 Melolontha melolontha, 204 Tetranychus pacificus, 113 Mononychellus tanajoa, 123 Tetranychus urticae, 100, 129, 163, 175, 216, Musca domestica, 7, 37, 100, 162, 190 267 Myzus persicae, 100, 213 Thaumetopoea pityocampa, 163 Myzus spp., 267 Tipula spp., 231 Neodiprioan sertifer, 152, 153 Trialeuroides spp., 267 Nephotettix spp., 100, 264 Trialeuroides vaporariorum, 129 Nephotettix virescens, 214 Tribolium castaneum, 181, 183 Nezara viridula, 20, 234 Trypodendron lineatum, 163 Nilaparvata lugens, 100, 224, 264 Varroa spp., 45 Oedaleus senegalensis, 231 Wiseana cervinata, 136 Ommatissus lybicus,65 Zeuzera pyrina, 163 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-56787-9 - An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control J. R. M. Thacker Index More information Beneficial species index Bacteria Metarhizium spp., 144 Bacillus popilliae, 137, 138, 142–143 Paecilomycetes fumoroseus, 145 Bacillus sphaericus, 137, 138, 142–143 Verticillium lecanii, 144–147, 233 Bacillus thuringiensis, 24, 135-143, 145, 149, 157, 208, 209, 215, 263, 268, 284, 291, 292, 295, Lacewings colour plate Chrysoperla carnea, 115, 123 Photorhabdus luminescens, 148 Chrysoperla rufilabris, 115 Pseudomonas fluorescens, 141 Serratia entomophilia, 137, 138 Parasitoids Xenorhabdus bovienii, 148 Agrypon flaveolatum, 119 Agrypon spp., 119 Beetles Aleiodes indiscretus, colour plate Adalia bipunctata, 115 Amitus spp., 119 Crytolaemus montrouzieri, 115 Anagrus atomus, 115 Cybocephalus nipponicus, 115 Anagrus epos, 130, 238 Delphastus pusillus, 115 Anagrus pseudococci, 115 Harmonia axyridis, 115 Anagrus spp., 119 Hippodamia convergens, 115 Anaphes iole, 115 Rhyzobius lophantae, 116 Aphelinus abdominalis, 115 Rodolia cardinalis, 123 Aphidencyrtus aphidivorus, 117 Stethorus punctillum, 116 Aphidius colemani, 115 Aphidius ervi, 115 Birds Aphidius matricariae, 115 Alcippe brunea, 130 Aphidius spp., 119 Aphidoletes aphidimyza, 115 Fish Aphytis lignanensis, 115 Gambusia spp., 130 Aphytis melinus, 115 Aphytis spp., 119 Fungi Bracon hebetor, 115 Beauvaria bassiana, 144–147, colour plate Chrysocharis spp., 119 Beauvaria brongniartii, 144–147 Cotesia plutella, 292 Entomophthora spp., 146 Cotesia spp., 115 Hirsutella thompsonii, 144 Cryptochetum iceryae, 123 Lagenidium giganteum, 144 Cyzenis albicans, 119 Metarhizium anisopliae, 144, 146, 269 Dacnusa sibrica, 115 Metarhizium flavoviride, 144 Dacnusa spp., 119 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-56787-9 - An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control J. R. M. Thacker Index More information 336 Beneficial species index Diglyphus isaea, 115 Orius laevigatus, 116 Encarsia formosa, 115, 129 Orius majusculus, 116 Encarsia spp., 101, 129, 267, 268 Podisus maculiventris, 116 Epidinocarsis lopezi, 123 Epidinocarsis spp., 119 Predatorymidges Eretomocerus spp., 101, 115, 268 Aphidoletes aphidimyza, 115 Leptomastix dactylopii, 115 Feltiella acarisuga, 115 Metaphycus bartletti, 116 Metaphycus helvolus, 116 Predatory mites Pediobius foveolatus, 116 Amblyseius barkeri, 115 Peristenuc digeneutis, colour plate Amblyseius californicus, 115 Prosena siberita, 118 Amblyseius cucumeris, 115 Scutellista cyanea, 117 Amblyseius degenerans, 115 Trichogramma bassicae, 116 Amblyseius fallacis, 115 Trichogramma evanescens, 116 Amblyseius montdorensis, 115 Trichogramma spp., 119, 129, 260 Galendromus annectans, 115 Trissolcus spp., 119 Galendromus occidentalis, 115 Hypoaspis aculeifer, 115 Nematodes Hypoaspis miles, 115 Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, 148 Neoseiulus idaeus, 124 Heterorhabiditis megidis, 148 Phytoseilus persimilis, 116, 129 Romanomermis culicivorax, 147 Typhlodromalus aripo, 124 Steinernema carpocapsae, 148 Typhlodromalus manihoti, 124 Steinernema fletiae, 148 Typhlodromus occidentalis, 116 Steinernema glaseri, 148 Typhlodromus pyri, 116, 263 Steinernema riobravis, 148, 149 Steinernema scapterisci, 148 Protozoa Predatoryhemiptera Nosema acridophagous, 152 Anthocoris nemoralis, 115 Nosema algerae, 151, 152 Cytorhinus lividipennis, 214 Nosema bombycis, 151 Deraeocoris brevis, 115 Nosema cuneatum, 152 Macrolophus caliginosus, 115 Nosema locustae, 151, 152, colour plate Orius albidipennis, 116 Nosema spp., 151, 152 Orius insidiosus, 116 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-56787-9 - An Introduction to Arthropod Pest Control J. R. M. Thacker Index More information Subject index Abiotic environmental manipulation, 236 Augmentation, 121, 128–129, Glossary page 315 Abu Mansur, 5, Glossary page 302 Aum Shinrikyo, 12 Acari, 120 Australia, 261, 269 Acetylation, Glossary page 307 Autocidal control, 191 Acetylcholine, 66 Autooxidation, 69, Glossary page 307 Active ingredient, 83 Aventis, 13 Adjuvants, 88, 89, 143, Glossary page 310 Azadirachtin, 29, 43, 46, 186, 215 Aerosols, 87 Aggregation pheromones, 160 Bacillus thuringiensis, 138–142 Agostino Bassi, 143 Bacteria, 137–143 Agricultural development, 4 Baculoviridae, 152,153, Glossary
Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Pheromone Mating Disruption for the Ponderosa

    Effectiveness of Pheromone Mating Disruption for the Ponderosa

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Christine G. Niwa for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomologypresented on October 24, 1988 Title: Effectiveness of Pheromone Mating Disruption for the Ponderosa Pine Tip Moth, Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and its Influence on the Associated Parasite Complex Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy ____(Garyy,w;Aterman Redacted for Privacy Tim DSchowalter The importance of pheromones in insect control relies both on their ability to reduce pest populations and on their relatively benign effects on nontarget organisms.This study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a pheromone application for mating disruption of the ponderosa pine tip moth, Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott), and to determine if this treatment had any affect on the abundance or structure of the associated parasite complex. Chemical analyses, electroantennograms, and field bioassays showed that the most abundant pheromone component for R. zozana was E-9-dodecenyl acetate with a lesser amount of E-9-dodecenol also present. Acetate/alcohol ratios averaged 70:30 in gland washes; male moths were most attracted to sticky traps with synthetic baits containing ratios ranging from 70:30 to 95:5. Sixteen hymenopteran and one dipteran species of parasites were recovered from R. zozana larvae and pupae collected in Calif. and Oreg. Total percentage parasitism was high, averaging 47.2%. The ichneumonid, Glypta zozanae Walley and Barron, was the most abundant parasite, attacking over 30% of the hosts collected. Mastrus aciculatus (Provancher) was second in abundance, accounting for less than 4% parasitism. Hercon laminated-tape dispensers containing synthetic sex pheromone (a 95:5 mixture of E-9-dodecenyl acetate and E-9-dodecenol) were manually applied on 57 ha of ponderosa pine plantations in southern Oreg.
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
  • Section 2. Jack Pine (Pinus Banksiana)

    Section 2. Jack Pine (Pinus Banksiana)

    SECTION 2. JACK PINE - 57 Section 2. Jack pine (Pinus banksiana) 1. Taxonomy and use 1.1. Taxonomy The largest genus in the family Pinaceae, Pinus L., which consists of about 110 pine species, occurs naturally through much of the Northern Hemisphere, from the far north to the cooler montane tropics (Peterson, 1980; Richardson, 1998). Two subgenera are usually recognised: hard pines (generally with much resin, wood close-grained, sheath of a leaf fascicle persistent, two fibrovascular bundles per needle — the diploxylon pines); and soft, or white pines (generally little resin, wood coarse-grained, sheath sheds early, one fibrovascular bundle in a needle — the haploxylon pines). These subgenera are called respectively subg. Pinus and subg. Strobus (Little and Critchfield, 1969; Price et al., 1998). Occasionally, one to about half the species (20 spp.) in subg. Strobus are classified instead in a variable subg. Ducampopinus. Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) and its close relative lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud.) are in subg. Pinus, subsection Contortae, which is classified either in section Trifoliis or a larger section Pinus (Little and Critchfield, 1969; Price et al., 1998). Additionally, subsect. Contortae usually includes Virginia pine (P. virginiana) and sand pine (P. clausa), which are in southeastern USA. Jack pine has two quite short (2-5 cm) stiff needles per fascicle (cluster) and lopsided (asymmetric) cones that curve toward the branch tip, and the cone scales often have a tiny prickle at each tip (Kral, 1993). Non-taxonomic ecological or biological variants of jack pine have been described, including dwarf, pendulous, and prostrate forms, having variegated needle colouration, and with unusual branching habits (Rudolph and Yeatman, 1982).
  • FURY 10 EW Active Substance: Zeta-Cypermethrin 100 G/L COUNTRY

    FURY 10 EW Active Substance: Zeta-Cypermethrin 100 G/L COUNTRY

    Part A Product name Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment - FURY 10 EW Page 1 of 27 Federal Republic of Germany 024222-00/01 REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management Product name: FURY 10 EW Active Substance: zeta-cypermethrin 100 g/L COUNTRY: Germany Central Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: Germany NATIONAL ASSESSMENT Applicant: Cheminova Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG Submission Date: 02/01/2014 Date: 17/08/2018 Applicant (Cheminova Deutschland GmbH) Evaluator BVL / DE Date: 17/09/ 2018 Part A Product name Registration Report –Central Zone National Assessment - FURY 10 EW Page 2 of 27 Federal Republic of Germany 024222-00/01 Table of Contents PART A – Risk Management 4 1 Details of the application 4 1.1 Application background 4 1.2 Annex I inclusion 4 1.3 Regulatory approach 5 2 Details of the authorisation 6 2.1 Product identity 6 2.2 Classification and labelling 6 2.3.2.2 Specific restrictions linked to the intended uses 9 2.3 Product uses 10 3 Risk management 12 3.1 Reasoned statement of the overall conclusions taken in accordance with the Uniform Principles 12 3.1.1 Physical and chemical properties (Part B, Section 1, Points 2 and 4) 12 3.1.2 Methods of analysis (Part B, Section 2, Point 5) 12 3.1.2.1 Analytical method for the formulation (Part B, Section 2, Point 5.2) 12 3.1.2.2 Analytical methods for residues (Part B, Section 2, Points 5.3 – 5.8) 12 3.1.3 Mammalian Toxicology (Part B, Section 3, Point 7) 12 The PPP is already registered in Germany according to Regulation (EU) No 1107/2009.
  • Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1

    Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1

    361 Pheromone-based disruption of Eucosma sonomana and Rhyacionia zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone1 Nancy E. Gillette, John D. Stein, Donald R. Owen, Jeffrey N. Webster, and Sylvia R. Mori Abstract: Two aerial applications of microencapsulated pheromone were conducted on five 20.2 ha plots to disrupt western pine shoot borer (Eucosma sonomana Kearfott) and ponderosa pine tip moth (Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) orientation to pheromones and oviposition in ponderosa pine plantations in 2002 and 2004. The first application was made at 29.6 g active ingredient (AI)/ha, and the second at 59.3 g AI/ha. Baited sentinel traps were used to assess disruption of orientation by both moth species toward pheromones, and E. sonomana infes- tation levels were tallied from 2001 to 2004. Treatments disrupted orientation by both species for several weeks, with the first lasting 35 days and the second for 75 days. Both applications reduced infestation by E. sonomana,but the lower application rate provided greater absolute reduction, perhaps because prior infestation levels were higher in 2002 than in 2004. Infestations in treated plots were reduced by two-thirds in both years, suggesting that while increas- ing the application rate may prolong disruption, it may not provide greater proportional efficacy in terms of tree pro- tection. The incidence of infestations even in plots with complete disruption suggests that treatments missed some early emerging females or that mated females immigrated into treated plots; thus operational testing should be timed earlier in the season and should comprise much larger plots. In both years, moths emerged earlier than reported pre- viously, indicating that disruption programs should account for warmer climates in timing of applications.
  • Container List

    Container List

    Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library: Agricultural Research Service Biological Control Documentation Center Collection Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory. Subseries I.A. Correspondence. Container List Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory (APL). 1927-1993. 20 boxes. Series I.A. Correspondence. 1963-1993. 16.5 boxes. Box 1 Folder 1 Abrahamson, Lawrence P. 1983-1984 Box 1 Folder 2 Abstract n.d. Box 1 Folder 3 Academic Press, Inc. 1986-1993 Box 1 Folder 4 Achterberg, Dr. Kees van 1982 Box 1 Folder 5 Aeschlimann, Dr. Jean-Paul 1981-1985 Box 1 Folder 6 Agricultural Counselor 1976-1981 Box 1 Folder 7 Air Force, Army 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 8 Aizawa, Professor Keio 1986 Box 1 Folder 9 Akasaka, Naoyuki 1982 Box 1 Folder 10 Allen, Professor Douglas C. 1981 Box 1 Folder 11 Allen Press, Inc. 1992-1993 Box 1 Folder 12 American Embassy, Beijing, China 1990-1991 Box 1 Folder 13 American Embassy, Tokyo, Japan 1981-1990 Box 1 Folder 14 American Journal of Botany 1992 Box 1 Folder 15 Amman, Dr. Gene D. 1982 Box 1 Folder 16 Amrine, Jr., Dr. James W. 1986 Box 1 Folder 17 Anderson, Don M. 1981-1983 Box 1 Folder 18 Anderson, John F. 1975-1976 Box 1 Folder 19 Andres, Dr. Lloyd 1989-1990 Box 1 Folder 20 Angalet, Dr. George W. 1973-1978 Box 1 Folder 21 Annual Reviews Inc. 1992 Box 1 Folder 22 Ao, Professor Hsien-Bine 1988 Box 1 Folder 23 Aoki, Professor Joji 1977-1978 Box 1 Folder 24 Apps, Dr. Darrel A. 1984 Box 1 Folder 25 Agricultural Research 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 26 Army, Thomas J.
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names

    Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names

    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    THE SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF METHOXYFENOZIDE ON THE FIELD ORIENTATION AND COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR OF CYDIA POMONELLA (LINNAEUS) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) A thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by AMANDA KAY FRANKLIN Dr. Bruce Barrett, Thesis Supervisor December 2008 The undersigned, appointed by the Dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled THE SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF METHOXYFENOZIDE ON THE FIELD ORIENTATION AND COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR OF CYDIA POMONELLA (LINNAEUS) (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) presented by Amanda Franklin a candidate for the degree of Master of Science and hereby certify that in their opinion it is worthy of acceptance. Major Advisor: _________________________________________ Dr. Bruce Barrett Thesis Committee: _________________________________________ Dr. Richard Houseman _________________________________________ Dr. Kent Shelby _________________________________________ Dr. Mark Ellersieck ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank and dedicate my research, first and foremost, to my family for all their endless support, without which I would not have made it this far. I would also like to thank my advisor, Dr. Bruce Barrett, for this opportunity and guidance throughout my years as a student. In addition, I would like to show my great appreciation for committee members, Dr. Mark Ellersieck, for providing all his statistical consultation and both Dr. Richard Houseman and Dr. Kent Shelby for reviewing my manuscript. Thanks as well to Randy Thiessen for all his help during my field study. I truly appreciate all the students and friends I have made in the graduate entomology program. Their sense of humor, understanding, and passion for entomology inspired me not only as a student but also as a working entomologist.
  • Biological Control of the Japanese Beetle from 1920 to 1964 Might Be More Available to Other Entomologists and the General Public

    Biological Control of the Japanese Beetle from 1920 to 1964 Might Be More Available to Other Entomologists and the General Public

    ~ 12.8 ~1112.5 11.0 :it il~~ "I"~ 1.0 W .. !lMI :: W12.2 :: w 12.2 ~ IW .. L:I. W !!!ll!iIil III : ~ '_0 :: ~ 2.0 1.1 ........ ~ 1.1 .. .... ~ --- - 1111,1.8 '"" 1.8 25 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 111111. 1/11/1. 4 111111. 6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAl, BUReAU or STANDARDS·1963·A NATIONAL BUREAU or STANDARDS·1963-A BIOL()GICAL CONTROL Of The JAPi\NESE BEETLE By 'W~lter E. Fleming Technical Bulletin No. 1383 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued February 1968 Forsale hy the S u peri n tenden t ofDoeumen ts, U.S. Go,",ernmentPrinting Office Washington, H.C. 20402 - l)rice 30 eents Contents Page Predators and parasites for control of beetle______________________________ 3 Xative predators llnd parasites______________________________________ 3 fnsedivorous birds__ _ _ ______ ._______________________________ 3 Tonds _________________________________________________ ------ 4 11anlnln~ _____________________________________________ ----- - 4 Predt\ceous insects _________________________________ --- ___ - ----- 5 Parasit ie insects ______________________________________ -------- - 6 Foreign predaceous and p:lrasitic insects_____________________________ 6 Explorations _____________ --________________________ - ________ -- 7 Biology of import:mt parasites and a predator in Far EasL ________ - 8 Hyperparasites in Far East.____________________________________ 18 Shipping parasites and predalors lo United Slales_________________ 19 Rearing imported
  • PRODUCTION of CYDIA POMONELLA GRANULOVIRUS (Cpgv) in a HETERALOGOUS HOST, THAUMATOTIBIA LEUCOTRETA (MEYRICK) (FALSE CODLING MOTH)

    PRODUCTION of CYDIA POMONELLA GRANULOVIRUS (Cpgv) in a HETERALOGOUS HOST, THAUMATOTIBIA LEUCOTRETA (MEYRICK) (FALSE CODLING MOTH)

    PRODUCTION OF CYDIA POMONELLA GRANULOVIRUS (CpGV) IN A HETERALOGOUS HOST, THAUMATOTIBIA LEUCOTRETA (MEYRICK) (FALSE CODLING MOTH). A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of RHODES UNIVERSITY By CRAIG BRIAN CHAMBERS December 2014 ABSTRACT Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus) (Family: Tortricidae), the codling moth, is considered one of the most significant pests of apples and pears worldwide, causing up to 80% crop loss in orchards if no control measures are applied. Cydia pomonella is oligophagous feeding on a number of alternate hosts including quince, walnuts, apricots, peaches, plums and nectarines. Historically the control of this pest has been achieved with the use of various chemical control strategies which have maintained pest levels below the economic threshold at a relatively low cost to the grower. However, there are serious concerns surrounding the use of chemical insecticides including the development of resistance in insect populations, the banning of various insecticides, regulations for lowering of the maximum residue level and employee and consumer safety. For this reason, alternate measures of control are slowly being adopted by growers such as mating disruption, cultural methods and the use of baculovirus biopesticides as part of integrated pest management programmes. The reluctance of growers to accept baculovirus or other biological control products in the past has been due to questionable product quality and inconsistencies in their field performance. Moreover, the development and application of biological control products is more costly than the use of chemical alternatives. Baculoviruses are arthropod specific viruses that are highly virulent to a number of lepidopteran species. Due to the virulence and host specificity of baculoviruses, Cydia pomonella granulovirus has been extensively and successfully used as part of integrated pest management systems for the control of C.
  • Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders

    Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders

    List Supplemental Information Content Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders Pests of trees and shrubs Class Arachnida, Spiders and mites elm bark beetle, smaller European Scolytus multistriatus Order Acari, Mites and ticks elm bark beetle, native Hylurgopinus rufipes pine bark engraver, Ips pini Family Eriophyidae, Leaf vagrant, gall, erinea, rust, or pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda eriophyid mites ash flower gall mite, Aceria fraxiniflora Order Hemiptera, True bugs, aphids, and scales elm eriophyid mite, Aceria parulmi Family Adelgidae, Pine and spruce aphids eriophyid mites, several species Cooley spruce gall adelgid, Adelges cooleyi hemlock rust mite, Nalepella tsugifoliae Eastern spruce gall adelgid, Adelges abietis maple spindlegall mite, Vasates aceriscrumena hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae maple velvet erineum gall, several species pine bark adelgid, Pineus strobi Family Tarsonemidae, Cyclamen and tarsonemid mites Family Aphididae, Aphids cyclamen mite, Phytonemus pallidus balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Family Tetranychidae, Freeranging, spider mites, honeysuckle witches’ broom aphid, tetranychid mites Hyadaphis tataricae boxwood spider mite, Eurytetranychus buxi white pine aphid, Cinara strobi clover mite, Bryobia praetiosa woolly alder aphid, Paraprociphilus tessellatus European red mite, Panonychus ulmi woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum honeylocust spider mite, Eotetranychus multidigituli Family Cercopidae, Froghoppers or spittlebugs spruce spider mite, Oligonychus ununguis spittlebugs, several
  • Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management

    Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management

    Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Since the early days of integrated pest management a sound ecological foundation has been considered essential for the development of effective systems. From time to time, there have been attempts to evaluate the ways in which ecological theory is exploited in pest control, and to review the lessons that ecologists learn from pest management. In the last 20 years there have been many developments within the contribution of ecological theory to integrated pest management, and the objective of this book is to capture some of the new themes in both pest management and ecology that have emerged and to provide an updated assessment of the role that basic ecology plays in the development of rational and sustainable pest management practices. The major themes are examined, assessing the significance and potential impact of recent technological and conceptual developments for the future of integrated pest management. Marcos Kogan is Professor and Director Emeritus of the Integrated Plant Protection Center at Oregon State University. Paul Jepson has been Director of the Integrated Plant Protection Center at Oregon State University since 2002. Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management edited by Marcos Kogan and Paul Jepson Oregon State University cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sa˜o Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521822138 ß Cambridge University Press 2007 This publication is in copyright.