Biological Control of the Japanese Beetle from 1920 to 1964 Might Be More Available to Other Entomologists and the General Public

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Control of the Japanese Beetle from 1920 to 1964 Might Be More Available to Other Entomologists and the General Public ~ 12.8 ~1112.5 11.0 :it il~~ "I"~ 1.0 W .. !lMI :: W12.2 :: w 12.2 ~ IW .. L:I. W !!!ll!iIil III : ~ '_0 :: ~ 2.0 1.1 ........ ~ 1.1 .. .... ~ --- - 1111,1.8 '"" 1.8 25 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 111111. 1/11/1. 4 111111. 6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAl, BUReAU or STANDARDS·1963·A NATIONAL BUREAU or STANDARDS·1963-A BIOL()GICAL CONTROL Of The JAPi\NESE BEETLE By 'W~lter E. Fleming Technical Bulletin No. 1383 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C. Issued February 1968 Forsale hy the S u peri n tenden t ofDoeumen ts, U.S. Go,",ernmentPrinting Office Washington, H.C. 20402 - l)rice 30 eents Contents Page Predators and parasites for control of beetle______________________________ 3 Xative predators llnd parasites______________________________________ 3 fnsedivorous birds__ _ _ ______ ._______________________________ 3 Tonds _________________________________________________ ------ 4 11anlnln~ _____________________________________________ ----- - 4 Predt\ceous insects _________________________________ --- ___ - ----- 5 Parasit ie insects ______________________________________ -------- - 6 Foreign predaceous and p:lrasitic insects_____________________________ 6 Explorations _____________ --________________________ - ________ -- 7 Biology of import:mt parasites and a predator in Far EasL ________ - 8 Hyperparasites in Far East.____________________________________ 18 Shipping parasites and predalors lo United Slales_________________ 19 Rearing imported parasites in Cnited Slates______________________ 24 Colonization of foreign parasiles and predators in United Slales_____ 27 Effect of milky disease on 'I'ipldll________________________________ 33 Effect of insccticides on pamsiles_______________________________ 33 Slatus of foreign parasites in ('niled Stales_______________________ 33 Entomogcnous disellses of heetle_______________________ ________________ 36 prolozoan and amebic diseases______________________________________ 37 X emalode diseases ______________________________________________ -- 38 Neoaplectlllw g/aseri Sleiner_____________________________________ 38 NroapleclaluL chresima Steiner________________________________ - -- 40 N cQuplectfLIw 1l1loiIL Sleiner _________________________________ ---- 41 Olher nematodes ________________________________________ ----- - 41 Fungus diseases ____________________________________________ ------- 42 MC/ILtrJdz'illllL anisoplioc (~letsch.) SOfok_________________________ 42 }'fel(lrritiziutn ylulillOSUIII Pope __________________________ ------ -- 43 I sllria tienslL AucL _________________________________ ----------- 43 Bcalll:eriIL globllliJcro Speg____________________________ ---------- 43 BCCLlU'eri(l bllssiana (Balsamo) Vllill_____________________________ 43 Bucterial milky diseuse _______________________________________ ------ 44 BacilLus l ]riliinc Dutky_____________________ _______ ____________ 46 JO Bacillus lcntilllorbus Dlltky_____________________________ -------- 64 BaciLLus euloomaTu/wc Beard____________________________________ 65 BaciLLus JribouTgensis Wille ______________________________ --- ---- 66 Other bacterial diseases____________________________________ -------- 66 Rickettsia disease_ _________ _ ____________ __________________________ 66 Slln\mary____________________________________________________________ 67 Literature ci ted_____________________________________________ --- --- ---- 70 ii BIOLOGICAL CONTROl4 Of The JAPANESE BEETLE By WAL'rER E. FLE,MING, collaborat01', Entomology Research Division, Agl'icllltuml ReserL1'ch Se'rvice During a routine inspection in mid-August 1916, E. L. Dickerson and H. B. Weiss of the New Jcrsl,W Department of Agriculture col­ lected about a dozen beetles in a nUl'sery of Henry A. Dreer be­ tween Riverton ancl Moorestown, N.J. These beetles were later foune! to be the same as sp0cimens of the Japanese beetle (Popillia japoniccL Newman) in the collection of the National Museum in \Vashington, D.C. Prior to its discovery in New Jersey the beetle was known to occur only on the main islands of Japan-Honshu, Kyushu, Shikoku, and Hokkaiclo. Other members of the genus are widely distributed in the Far East. It is not known definitely how and when the beetle came hom Japan to Ne\v Jersey. It was prob­ ably transported in the grub stage in soil about the rhizomes of Japanese iris. The abundance of the beetle in 1917 indicated that the insect had been in the nursery for at least 5 years. (Clausen et al. 1927; DickeL'son and Weiss 1918; Howal'd1918; Smith and Hadley l.92(i; Weiss 7.fJIN, 7.978(11) A large part of the main islands of Japan is heavily forested mountainous country. Much of the land is rolling prairie covered with persistent bamboo grasses at the foot of high mountain ranges. These conditions are not favorable for the beetle. The natural, agricultural conditions in Hokkaiclo more nearly approach those of the Eastern United States. The beetle is most abundant in the northern half of Honshu and in all of Hokkaido where grasslands occur, but its population density never reaches that in the Eastern United States, probably because its natul'al enemies keep it under control. Nowhere in Japan is the beetle considered to be an eco­ nomically important pest. Damage to crops sometimes occurs in Hokkaido, but the preference of the insect for certain weeds grow­ ing along the roadsides usually prevents serious injury to the plants (Clausen et al. 1927). Recognizing the potential threat of the beetle to American agri­ culture, the former U.S. Bureau of Entomology established the 1 The year in italics after the author's name is the key to the reference in Litemture Cited, p. 70. 1 2 TECHXICAL BULLETIN 1383, U.s. DEP'r. 01<' AGRICULTURE Japanese Beetle Laboratory in 1917 near Riverton, N.J., to study the life histOI"y and habits of the insect in its Hew environment and later to develop biological, chemical, and cultural methods for its control (Agee 1918; Davis 1920, 1920a; Hadley 1922; Headlee 1918; Howarcl1918) .1n 1927 the Laboratory was moved to Moores­ town, N.J., where it has remained. In New Jersey the beetle found a generally favorable climate, large areas of permanent turf for the development of the,mmature stages, almost 000 species of plants to satisfy its voracious appetite, ancl no important natural enemies (Fleming 196,]). It spread rapidly. The infestation coyered 2Y2 square miles in 1917, 6V~ square miles in 1918, 48 square miles in 1919, 103 square miles in 1920, and 270 square miles in 1921 (Smith and Hadley 1926). By 1962 the beetle had spread over more than 100,000 square miles in 14 eastl::rn States and the District of Columbia (Fleming 1963). In its new environment it soon became a threat to American agri­ culture. It seriously damaged orchard crops, certain Held crops, and ol'namental trees and shrubs. The grub destroyed large areas of turf in lawns, golf courses, and pastures and damaged the roots of some cultivated crops. Although preliminary studies had been made earlier, the investi­ gation of biological control of the beetle was undertaken in 1920. Two entomologists were sent that year by the former U.S. Bureau of Entomology to Japan to study the predators and parasites of the beetle in its nath'e land. The program in the Far East was successful. Five species of parasitic insects from the Far East were colonized and became established in the infested area in the United States. The studies of diseases of the beetle were undertaken in 1922, when sick grubs found in the field were discovered to be infected mainly by bacteria ancl fungi, although the organisms causing the infections were not identified specifically. One of the most im­ pressiYe achievements of the Japanese Beetle Laboratory was the development of the knowledge of pathogens attacking the beetle to a point where it was feasible to mass-produce and colonize some of these organisms in the field to control this destructive insect. Some phases of the investigation of biological control were con­ ducted cooperatively with other Federal agencies, State agricul­ tural experiment stations, State departments of agriculture, and universities within the area infested by the beetle. Reports on the progress of the investigation appeared from time to time in Federal and State publications and in various scientific journals, but much additional information is found in the unpublished progress re­ ports by H. W. Allen, J. \Y. Balock, 1YI. H. Brunson, R. W. Burrell, T. N. Dobbins, S. R. Dutky, H. Fox, T. H. Frison, T. R. Gardner, H. B. Girth, H. A. Jaynes, H. C. Hallock, 1. M. Hawley, J. K. Hollo­ way, J. L. King, T. L. Ladd, P. J. :McCabe, L. B. Parker, G. E. Spencer, H. Tashiro, G. F. White, R. T. \Vhite, and H. J. \Villard and in the unpubl1shed quarterly and annual reports of the Japa­ nese Beetle Laboratory by C. H. Hadley and W. E. Fleming on file at the Laboratory. I have reviewed these published and unpub­ lished records and have prepared a digest so that information on BroLOGICAL COXTROL OF THE JAPA);~SE BEETLE 3 the biological control of the Japanese beetle from 1920 to 1964 might be more available to other entomologists and the general public. PREDATORS AND PARASITES FOR CONTROl: OF BEETLE Native Predators and Parasites The insect-feeding birds, small terrestrial mammais, and the few predaceous and parasitic insects indigenous to the Eastel'l1 United States were not able to cope with the twentyfold to thirty­ fold reproductive potential of the Japanese beetle. Although
Recommended publications
  • A Carboniferous Insect Gall: Insight Into Early Ecologic History of the Holometabola (Pennsylvanian/Marattiales/Psaronius/Herbivory/Plant-Insect Interaction) C
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 8470-8474, August 1996 Evolution A Carboniferous insect gall: Insight into early ecologic history of the Holometabola (Pennsylvanian/Marattiales/Psaronius/herbivory/plant-insect interaction) C. C. LABANDEIRA*tt AND T. L. PHILLIPS§ *Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560; tDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; and §Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 Communicated by Estella Leopold, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, February 27, 1996 (received for review March 1, 1995) ABSTRACT Although the prevalence or even occurrence known of the histological details of these galls, their structural of insect herbivory during the Late Carboniferous (Pennsyl- comparisons to modern galls, or the identity of their culprits. vanian) has been questioned, we present the earliest-known ecologic evidence showing that by Late Pennsylvanian times Geochronological Context and Techniques of Preparation (302 million years ago) a larva of the Holometabola was galling the internal tissue of Psaronius tree-fern fronds. From 28 known occurrences of galled tree-fern petioles from Several diagnostic cellular and histological features of these the Upper Pennsylvanian Mattoon Formation of the Illinois petiole galls have been preserved in exquisite detail, including Basin (unpublished data), 7 undistorted specimens have been an excavated axial lumen filled with fecal pellets and commi- intensively studied. These galls originate from the Calhoun and nuted frass, plant-produced response tissue surrounding the Berryville localities of the Calhoun coal-ball flora of east- lumen, and specificity by the larval herbivore for a particular central Illinois (10), and are "302 million years old (Ma), host species and tissue type.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2009) 23 (Suppl
    Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2009) 23 (Suppl. 1), 1–7 Enabling technologies to improve area-wide integrated pest management programmes for the control of screwworms A. S. ROBINSON , M. J. B. VREYSEN , J. HENDRICHS and U. FELDMANN Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/International Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/IAEA) Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria Abstract . The economic devastation caused in the past by the New World screwworm fly Cochliomyia hominivorax (Coquerel) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to the livestock indus- try in the U.S.A., Mexico and the rest of Central America was staggering. The eradication of this major livestock pest from North and Central America using the sterile insect tech- nique (SIT) as part of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programme was a phenomenal technical and managerial accomplishment with enormous economic implications. The area is maintained screwworm-free by the weekly release of 40 million sterile flies in the Darien Gap in Panama, which prevents migration from screwworm- infested areas in Columbia. However, the species is still a major pest in many areas of the Caribbean and South America and there is considerable interest in extending the eradica- tion programme to these countries. Understanding New World screwworm fly popula- tions in the Caribbean and South America, which represent a continuous threat to the screwworm-free areas of Central America and the U.S.A., is a prerequisite to any future eradication campaigns. The Old World screwworm fly Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve (Diptera: Calliphoridae) has a very wide distribution ranging from Southern Africa to Papua New Guinea and, although its economic importance is assumed to be less than that of its New World counterpart, it is a serious pest in extensive livestock production and a constant threat to pest-free areas such as Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira
    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual The Brazilian Fossil Insects: Current Scenario Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Scheler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências: Patrimônio Geopaleontológico, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s/nº, São Cristóvão, 20940-040. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Recebido em: 24/01/2018 Aprovado em: 08/03/2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2018_1_142_166 Resumo O presente trabalho fornece um panorama geral sobre o conhecimento da paleoentomologia brasileira até o presente, abordando insetos do Paleozoico, Mesozoico e Cenozoico, incluindo a atualização das espécies publicadas até o momento após a última grande revisão bibliográica, mencionando ainda as unidades geológicas em que ocorrem e os trabalhos relacionados. Palavras-chave: Paleoentomologia; insetos fósseis; Brasil Abstract This paper provides an overview of the Brazilian palaeoentomology, about insects Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including the review of the published species at the present. It was analiyzed the geological units of occurrence and the related literature. Keywords: Palaeoentomology; fossil insects; Brazil Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ 142 ISSN 0101-9759 e-ISSN 1982-3908 - Vol. 41 - 1 / 2018 p. 142-166 A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Schefler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes 1 Introdução Devoniano Superior (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004). Os insetos são um dos primeiros organismos Algumas ordens como Blattodea, Hemiptera, Odonata, Ephemeroptera e Psocopera surgiram a colonizar os ambientes terrestres e aquáticos no Carbonífero com ocorrências até o recente, continentais (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Elm Disease
    2/16/2021 Dutch Elm Disease Published on Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (https://ag.umass.edu) Dutch Elm Disease [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Dutch elm disease (DED) is a lethal vascular wilt disease of American elm (Ulmus americana) that is caused by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and O. ulmi. While once widespread in the region, O. ulmi has been displaced by the more aggressive O. novo-ulmi and is now believed to be uncommon to rare in the region. Both O. novo-ulmi and O. ulmi are non-native to North America and Europe. Overland spread of DED from diseased to healthy elms is facilitated by the native elm bark beetle (Hylurgopinus rufipes) and European elm bark beetle (Scolytus multistriatus). The disease also spreads from diseased to healthy trees through root grafts when elms are in close proximity to one another. Hosts All North American elms are susceptible to DED to some degree. American elm, the most abundant elm species in New England, is highly susceptible while the two other native elms occasionally found in landscape settings, rock elm (U. thomasii) and slippery elm (U. rubra), vary from susceptible to somewhat resistant. Several DED-resistant cultivars of American elm have been developed, with Princeton (U. americana ′Princeton′) and Valley Forge (U. americana ′Valley Forge′) the most abundant in area nurseries. While both cultivars offer good to excellent resistance to DED, they both suffer from poor canopy structure and are prone to stem and branch breakage under high winds and snow. Additional cultivars that are not as widely available, but offer more desirable canopy structure and form, include Jefferson (U.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of the Rutelinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) of Oceania
    CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS VOLUME XI, NUMBER 2 HONOLULU, HAWAII PUBLISHED BY THE MUSJ-:UM 1935 CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS MAINZ, GERMANY BIOLOGY The RuteIinae are plant feeders. In Parastasia the beetle (imago) visits flowers, and the grub (larva) lives in dead trunks of more or less hard wood. In Anomala the beetle is a leaf feeder, and the grub lives in the earth, feeding on the roots of living plants. In Adoretus the beetle feeds on flowers and leaves; the grub lives in the earth and feeds upon the roots of living plants. In some species of Anornala and Adoretus, both beetles and grubs are noxious to culti­ vated plants, and it has been observed that eggs or young grubs of these species have been transported in the soil-wrapping around roots or parts of roots of such plants as the banana, cassava, and sugar cane. DISTRIBUTION With the exception of two species, the Rutelinae found on the continent of Australia (including Tasmania) belong to the subtribe Anoplognathina. The first exception is Anomala (Aprosterna) antiqua Gyllenhal (australasiae Blackburn), found in northeast Queensland in cultivated places near the coast. This species is abundant from British India and southeast China in the west to New Guinea in the east, stated to be noxious here and there to cultivated plants. It was probably brought to Queensland by brown or white men, as either eggs or young grubs in soil around roots of bananas, cassava, or sugar cane.
    [Show full text]
  • (Neuroptera) from the Upper Cenomanian Nizhnyaya Agapa Amber, Northern Siberia
    Cretaceous Research 93 (2019) 107e113 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Short communication New Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) from the upper Cenomanian Nizhnyaya Agapa amber, northern Siberia * Vladimir N. Makarkin a, Evgeny E. Perkovsky b, a Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690022, Russia b Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, ul. Bogdana Khmel'nitskogo 15, Kiev, 01601, Ukraine article info abstract Article history: Libanoconis siberica sp. nov. and two specimens of uncertain affinities (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) are Received 28 April 2018 described from the Upper Cretaceous (upper Cenomanian) Nizhnyaya Agapa amber, northern Siberia. Received in revised form The new species is distinguished from L. fadiacra (Whalley, 1980) by the position of the crossvein 3r-m 9 August 2018 being at a right angle to both RP1 and the anterior trace of M in both wings. The validity of the genus Accepted in revised form 11 September Libanoconis is discussed. It easily differs from all other Aleuropteryginae by a set of plesiomorphic 2018 Available online 15 September 2018 character states. The climatic conditions at high latitudes in the late Cenomanian were favourable enough for this tropical genus, hitherto known from the Gondwanan Lebanese amber. Therefore, the Keywords: record of a species of Libanoconis in northern Siberia is highly likely. © Neuroptera 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Coniopterygidae Aleuropteryginae Cenomanian Nizhnyaya Agapa amber 1. Introduction 2. Material and methods The small-sized neuropteran family Coniopterygidae comprises This study is based on three specimens originally embedded in ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae* ) in Agroecological Systems of Northern Cauca, Colombia
    Pardo-Locarno et al.: White Grub Complex in Agroecological Systems 355 STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE WHITE GRUB COMPLEX (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE* ) IN AGROECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF NORTHERN CAUCA, COLOMBIA LUIS CARLOS PARDO-LOCARNO1, JAMES MONTOYA-LERMA2, ANTHONY C. BELLOTTI3 AND AART VAN SCHOONHOVEN3 1Vegetales Orgánicos C.T.A. 2Departmento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Apartado Aéreo 25360, Cali, Colombia 3Parque Científico Agronatura, CIAT, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical Apartado Aéreo, 6713 Cali, Colombia ABSTRACT The larvae of some species of Scarabaeidae, known locally as “chisas” (whitegrubs), are impor- tant pests in agricultural areas of the Cauca, Colombia. They form a complex consisting of many species belonging to several genera that affect the roots of commercial crops. The objec- tive of the present study was to identify the members of the complex present in two localities (Caldono and Buenos Aires) and collect basic information on their biology, economic impor- tance, and larval morphology. The first of two types of sampling involved sampling adults in light traps installed weekly throughout one year. The second method involved larval collec- tions in plots of cassava, pasture, coffee, and woodland. Each locality was visited once per month and 10 samples per plot were collected on each occasion, with each sample from a quad- rants 1 m2 by 15 cm deep, during 1999-2000. Light traps collected 12,512 adults belonging to 45 species and 21 genera of Scarabaeidae within the subfamilies Dynastinae, Melolonthinae, and Rutelinae. Members of the subfamily Dynastinae predominated with 48% of the species (mostly Cyclocephala), followed in decreasing order by Melolonthinae (35%) and Rutelinae (15%, principally Anomala).
    [Show full text]
  • Adoretus Versutus Harold 1869] in the Sandy Rhizosphere of Acacia Nilotica Subsp
    INT. J. BIOL. BIOTECH., 10 (2): 319-325, 2013. THE OCCURRENCE OF WHITE GRUB [ADORETUS VERSUTUS HAROLD 1869] IN THE SANDY RHIZOSPHERE OF ACACIA NILOTICA SUBSP. NILOTICA SEEDLINGS IRRIGATED WITH MODERATELY SALINE WATER D. Khan1, Zulfiqar Ali Sahito1 and Imtiaz Ahmad2 1Department of Botany, University of Karachi, Karachi - 75270, Pakistan. 2MAH Qadri Biological Research Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi 75270, Pakistan. ABSTRACT Ten white grub larvae (third instar) were found in the sandy rhizospheres of Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica seedlings irrigated with saline water of EC: 9.23 and 12.81dS.m-1 for more than two months in Biosalinity Experimental Field, department of Botany, University of Karachi. These larvae were incubated in laboratory. The soil was once sprinkled with tap water to maintain moisture level. After eight days the eight of the larvae died but two turned up into pupa which after around six to eight days gave rise to adult leaf chafer beetle. This organism on the basis of external morphology and genitalia was identified as Adoretus versutus Harold, 1869) - a serious pest on rose and several other plants. The grubs appeared to be tolerant to moderate level of salinity Key Words: White Grub, Leaf Chafer Adoretus versutus Harold, Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica seedlings, Saline water irrigation. INTRODUCTION In the month of November, 2012, during harvest of Acacia nilotica ssp. nilotica seedlings subject to an experiment pertaining to the salinity tolerance of this plant, a number of white grubs (10 in number) were recovered from the basic (pH: 8.09) sandy loam soil of pots irrigated with saline water of EC: 9.23 and 12.81dS.m-1.
    [Show full text]
  • 372 S. L. Winterton Et Al. Are Obligate Predators of Freshwater Sponges and Bryozoans, Whereas Nevrorthidae Are Generalist Benth
    372 S. L. Winterton et al. are obligate predators of freshwater sponges and bryozoans, Berothidae and Mantispidae whereas Nevrorthidae are generalist benthic predators in lotic habitats. Sometimes incorrectly referred to as semiaquatic, Mantispidae (mantid lacewings) are distinctive lacewings some osmylid larvae (e.g. Osmylinae, Kempyninae) are found with raptorial forelegs resembling preying mantids (Mantodea). in moist stream-bank habitats, whereas other species (e.g. The phylogenetic placement of Rhachiberothinae (thorny Stenosmylinae, Porisminae) live under bark in drier habitats. lacewings) is contentious, having been proposed as a subfam- Our data (Figs 5, 7; Figure S1) support a clade comprising ily of Berothidae (Tjeder, 1959; MacLeod & Adams, 1968), Nevrorthidae, Sisyridae and Osmylidae sister to the rest of a subfamily of Mantispidae (Willmann, 1990) and as a sep- Neuroptera after Coniopterygidae. Unfortunately, this clade has arate family entirely (Aspock¨ & Mansell, 1994; Grimaldi & weak statistical support, and in the pruned analysis Sisyridae Engel, 2005). Our analyses recovered a monophyletic clade are recovered as sister to Dilaridae. A close relationship composed of Mantispidae + Berothidae with relatively strong between these two families was supported by Sziraki´ (1996) support (PP = 1.00, PB = 91%, DI = 9) (Fig. 5). Unfortu- based on female internal genitalia. Using molecular data, nately, internal relationships between and within these families Haring & Aspock¨ (2004) also placed Nevrorthidae, Sisyridae were not recovered with strong support and varied among and Osmylidae in sequence as sister taxa to the rest of analyses (Figs 4–7; Figs 4, 5). The enigmatic Ormiscocerus Neuroptera. The placement of Nevrorthidae as sister to the was transferred recently from Hemerobiidae to Berothidae: rest of Neuroptera by these authors supported a previous Cyrenoberothinae (Penny & Winterton, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Domestic Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan"
    U.S. Domestic Japanese Beetle Harmonization Plan Adopted by the National Plant Board August 19, 1998 Last Revision June 20, 2016 i Collins National Plant Board OsamaEI-Lissy Deputy Administrator Plant Proteclion and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture CraigRegelbrugge Senior Yice President- Industry Advocacy & Research AmericanHort TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECTIVE SUMMARY 1 I. GOALS AND BACKGROUND 1 II. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING JAPANESE BEETLE INFESTATION STATUS 2 III. DEFINITIONS 3 IV. REGULATORY STRATEGIES 3 Category 1 - Uninfested/Quarantine Pest 3 Category 2 – Uninfested or Partially Infested 4 Category 3 – Partially or Generally Infested 4 Category 4 –Not Known To Be Infested/Unlikely To Become Established 4 V. HARMONIZATION PLAN COMMITTEES AND MEMBERSHIP 5 VI. HARMONIZATION PLAN MODIFICATIONS 5 VII. REGULATORY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PESTICIDE DISCLAIMERS 6 APPENDIX 1. SHIPMENT TO CATEGORY 1 STATES 7 Certification Options 1-4 1. Production in an Approved Japanese Beetle Free Greenhouse/Screenhouse 7 2. Production During a Pest Free Window 7 3. Application of Approved Regulatory Treatments 8 4. Detection Survey for Origin Certification 10 Adult Japanese Beetle Mitigation Requirements 11 APPENDIX 2. SHIPMENT TO CATEGORY 2 STATES 14 Certification Options 1-5 1. Application of Approved Regulatory Treatments 14 2. Japanese Beetle Nursery Trapping Program 15 3. Field Grown Nursery Stock Accreditation Program 16 4. Containerized Nursery Stock Accreditation Program 17 5. Shipment of Sod 18 Adult Japanese Beetle Mitigation Requirements 18 APPENDIX 3: SHIPMENT INTO CANADA FROM THE UNITED STATES 21 APPENDIX 4: STATEWIDE DETECTION & DELIMITING SURVEY 23 APPENDIX 5. BIOLOGY AND PEST RISK ANALYSIS 25 APPENDIX 6.
    [Show full text]