DOCSLIB.ORG

An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown. verse group of beetles, comprising more than 30,000 species in 13families worldwide. Over 1,530 species Methods occur in the continental United States. Despite this superfamily's popularity among scientists and hob- To determine what species had been taken in byists, and its incredible diversity (or perhaps, Wisconsin, historical collection and literature because of it), few scarabaeoid surveys have been records, as well as data from private regional collec- conducted in the United States. Blatchley (1910) tions [e.g. University of Wisconsin-Madison Insect surveyed the Coleoptera of Indiana; Dawson (1922b) Research Collection (WIRC) (including the collec- catalogued the scarabs of Nebraska; Blatchley (1927 tion of Daniel K. Young), Milwaukee Public Muse- a,b, 1928 a-d, 1929 a-c, 1930 a,b) catalogued the um (MPMC), and Field Museum of Natural History scarabs of Florida; Rogers (unpublished M.S. the- (FMNH)] were compiled. Field sampling focused on sis, 1946) surveyed the scarabs of Washington State, regions of Wisconsin that had unique records or which served as the basis of Hatch's (1971) treat- were thought to be historically under-sampled. A ment of scarabs in his volumes on Coleoptera of the variety of collecting methods was employed, includ- Pacific Northwest; Helgesen and Post (1967) sur- ing blacklight, flight intercept traps (Malaise and veyed the saprophagous scarabs of North Dakota, window-pane), Lindgren funnel, unbaited and bait- which was followed by the phytophagous scarabs ed pitfall traps, leaf litter and sand sifting, and and trogids (Lago et al. 1979). Following Blatchley's hand collecting from flowers and foliage during works, Woodruff (1973) and Woodruff and Beck both daylight and evening hours. To expand geo- (1989) published more detailed surveys of Florida graphical and temporal species distributions, spe- laprostict scarabs and June beetles, respectively. cific sites were chosen for more in-depth examina- Expanding on Dawson's catalogue, Ratcliffe (1991 tions due to apparent species rarity or uniqueness a,b) published the most comprehensive (Nebras- of habitat types. Collecting efforts were modified kan) scarabaeoid surveys to date. Harpootlian (2001) for specific taxa, and natural history information surveyed the scarabaeoids of South Carolina. was gathered for each species. No comprehensive scarabaeoid surveys have Field samples from broader, ongoing surveys been conducted in Wisconsin, much less the Great [e.g. joint projects with the Wisconsin Department Lakes region. Rauterberg (1885-1889) recorded a of Natural Resources, Nature Conservancy surveys passalid and some stag beetles from Milwaukee (e.g. HemlockDraw), Fort McCoy inventory project, County; Snyder (1897) recorded 30 species from and inventory work at the Necedah National Wild- Dodge County; Dahl and Mahr (1991) conducted a life Refuge] also contributed significantly to this limited survey of June beetles (Phyllophaga spp.); study. Katovich (1995) and Katovich et al. (1998) surveyed the larvae of Wisconsin Phyllophaga. Until now, 32 Volume 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002, INSECTA MUNDI Results Oconto; WC: Monroe; C: Wood; SW: Richland; SC: Green. This survey yielded 177 Wisconsin scarabaeoid Family Passalidae species representing nine families. The familial phylogenetic arrangement of Scarabaeoidea adopt- Odontotaenius disjunctus (Illiger) - Schuster ed herein is based primarily on the works of Browne (1983)". Rauterberg (1889) reported this species to and Scholtz (1999). Subfamilial, tribal, and generic be widely encountered in Wisconsin, however, he arrangements are primarily based on Lawrence provided no further locality data, and no Wisconsin and Newton (1995) and Ratcliffe (1991b), respec- specimens have been found. It is possible that this tively. Vouchers of specimens taken during this species has been extirpated from Wisconsin due to survey are housed in the WIRC. A website has been the loss of mature, old growth forests with downed developed for Wisconsin scarabaeoids, and it in- timber of moderate to large diameter in the south- cludes information on their distributions in the ern half of Wisconsin. form of printable maps; it can be accessed at the following address: Family Lucanidae Subfamily Lucaninae Dorcus parallelus (Say) - Benesh (1960). Hand Additionally, a specimen-level database for all collected at night, on the trunlc of a standing Wisconsin records has been completed as part of a dead hackberry tree (Celtis sp.) and on the larger project for Wisconsin's Coleoptera fauna. trunk of Quercus rubra (Linnaeus) (red oak). The data reside with the authors and the WIRC June-July. NC: Lincoln, Taylor; SW: Grant, La under the BIOTA software (Colwell 1996). Crosse; SC: Dane, Sauk; SE: Milwaukee. In the following checklist of Wisconsin Scara- Lucanus capreolus (Linnaeus) - Benesh (1960). baeoidea, the 56 new state species records are Taken at UV light, hand collected at night from indicated in boldface. Species previously recorded porches, sidewalks, and sandy roads. May-Au- in the literature from Wisconsin are followed by the gust. WC: Monroe; SW: Crawford, Grant, Rich- pertinent literature reference. Those species with a land, Vernon; SC: Columbia, Dane, Iowa, Rock; literature record only (no specimens found and no SE: Jefferson, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Racine, locality data available) are marked with an asterisk Waukesha. (*) following the literature citation. To simplify Lucanus placidus Say - Benesh (1960). Shenefeldt county associations, Wisconsin has been divided and Simkover (1950) reported conifer damage into nine, 8-county regions (Map 1) after Hilsenhoff in tree nurseries in Wisconsin by the larvae (1995). Life history and phenological information feeding on the roots. On one occasion, an aggre- pertain solely to adult Wisconsin scarabaeoid records gation of about 15 males and females was found and has been taken directly from labels accompany- under Quercus velutina Lamarck (black oak) ing specimens. Thus, in reporting plant associa- shortly after dusk. May-August. NW: Burnett, tions, we report the data as indicated by specimen Rusk; NE: Marinette, Oconto; WC: Monroe, labels. However, we also commonly indicate an Pierce; C: Adams, Juneau, Portage, Waupaca, appropriate vernacular name when the specimen Wood; EC: Winnebago; SW: Grant, La Crosse, bears a latin binomial, and vice versa [e.g., on the Richland, Vernon; SC: Columbia, Dane, Lafay- trunk of a standing dead hackberry tree (Celtis sp.)] ette, Rock, Sauk; SE: Racine, Walworth. or [on the trunk of Quercus rubra (Linnaeus) (red Platycerus piceus (Kzrby) - Benesh (1960). Found oak)]. Many scarabaeoid species are long-lived as along the shore of Lake Superior. May-July. adults, and many phenologies are likely artifacts of NW: Bayfield, Douglas; NE: Marinette. human activity. We still lack sound natural history Platycerus virescens (Fabricius) - Benesh (1960). information for some species in Wisconsin. On the surface of rotting oak logs. April-Sep- tember. NW: Bayfield; NC: Oneida; NE: Door, Family Glaresidae Oconto; WC: Eau Claire; C: Waupaca, Waush- ara; SW: Grant; SC: Dane, Green, La Fayette, Glaresis inducta Horn - Gordon (1970). All speci- Saulc; SE: Ozaukee, Racine. mens taken at UV light. June-September. NE: INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 3 Map 1. Regional divisions (nine, 8-county areas) of Wisconsin (after Hilsenhoff 1995) Subfamily Nicaginae Subfamily Syndesinae Nicagus obscurus (LeConte) - Katovich and Kriska Ceruchuspiceus (Weber) - Benesh (1960). Found in (2002). Dead and live specimens discovered oak logs in an advanced red-rot
Recommended publications
  • Dung Beetle Richness, Abundance, and Biomass Meghan Gabrielle Radtke Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Mradtk1@Lsu.Edu

    Dung Beetle Richness, Abundance, and Biomass Meghan Gabrielle Radtke Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Tropical Pyramids: Dung Beetle Richness, Abundance, and Biomass Meghan Gabrielle Radtke Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Radtke, Meghan Gabrielle, "Tropical Pyramids: Dung Beetle Richness, Abundance, and Biomass" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 364. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/364 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. TROPICAL PYRAMIDS: DUNG BEETLE RICHNESS, ABUNDANCE, AND BIOMASS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Meghan Gabrielle Radtke B.S., Arizona State University, 2001 May 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. G. Bruce Williamson, and my committee members, Dr. Chris Carlton, Dr. Jay Geaghan, Dr. Kyle Harms, and Dr. Dorothy Prowell for their help and guidance in my research project. Dr. Claudio Ruy opened his laboratory to me during my stay in Brazil and collaborated with me on my project. Thanks go to my field assistants, Joshua Dyke, Christena Gazave, Jeremy Gerald, Gabriela Lopez, and Fernando Pinto, and to Alejandro Lopera for assisting me with Ecuadorian specimen identifications. I am grateful to Victoria Mosely-Bayless and the Louisiana State Arthropod Museum for allowing me work space and access to specimens.
  • Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea

    Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea

    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/morphologytaxono12haye ' / ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Volume XII PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS *, URBANA, ILLINOIS I EDITORIAL COMMITTEE John Theodore Buchholz Fred Wilbur Tanner Charles Zeleny, Chairman S70.S~ XLL '• / IL cop TABLE OF CONTENTS Nos. Pages 1. Morphological Studies of the Genus Cercospora. By Wilhelm Gerhard Solheim 1 2. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Biology of Larval Scarabaeoidea. By William Patrick Hayes 85 3. Sawflies of the Sub-family Dolerinae of America North of Mexico. By Herbert H. Ross 205 4. A Study of Fresh-water Plankton Communities. By Samuel Eddy 321 LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS Vol. XII April, 1929 No. 2 Editorial Committee Stephen Alfred Forbes Fred Wilbur Tanner Henry Baldwin Ward Published by the University of Illinois under the auspices of the graduate school Distributed June 18. 1930 MORPHOLOGY, TAXONOMY, AND BIOLOGY OF LARVAL SCARABAEOIDEA WITH FIFTEEN PLATES BY WILLIAM PATRICK HAYES Associate Professor of Entomology in the University of Illinois Contribution No. 137 from the Entomological Laboratories of the University of Illinois . T U .V- TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Introduction Q Economic importance Historical review 11 Taxonomic literature 12 Biological and ecological literature Materials and methods 1%i Acknowledgments Morphology ]* 1 ' The head and its appendages Antennae. 18 Clypeus and labrum ™ 22 EpipharynxEpipharyru Mandibles. Maxillae 37 Hypopharynx <w Labium 40 Thorax and abdomen 40 Segmentation « 41 Setation Radula 41 42 Legs £ Spiracles 43 Anal orifice 44 Organs of stridulation 47 Postembryonic development and biology of the Scarabaeidae Eggs f*' Oviposition preferences 48 Description and length of egg stage 48 Egg burster and hatching Larval development Molting 50 Postembryonic changes ^4 54 Food habits 58 Relative abundance.
  • Autographa Gamma

    Autographa Gamma

    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
  • Strigoderma Sulcipennis BURMEISTER 1844 (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) EN EL CULTIVO DE MAÍZ EN VALPARAISO ZACATECAS, MÉXICO

    Strigoderma Sulcipennis BURMEISTER 1844 (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) EN EL CULTIVO DE MAÍZ EN VALPARAISO ZACATECAS, MÉXICO

    ENTOMOLOGÍA AGRÍCOLA ISSN: 2448-475X Strigoderma sulcipennis BURMEISTER 1844 (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) EN EL CULTIVO DE MAÍZ EN VALPARAISO ZACATECAS, MÉXICO Julio Lozano-Gutiérrez , Martha Patricia España-Luna, David Enríquez-Enríquez, J. Jesús Balleza-Cadengo, José Manuel Pinedo-Espinoza Docente-Investigador de la Unidad Académica de Agronomía de la Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas. Carr. Zacatecas-Guadalajara km 15, Cieneguillas, Zac. Autor de correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN. En una parcela de maíz localizada en el municipio de Valparaiso, Zacatecas, se presentó un insecto desconocido en la región, así la presente investigación tiene como objetivo ubicar taxonómicamente el insecto plaga que se presentó, y observar su disposición espacial. Se determinó que el insecto defoliador que se presentó fue Strigoderma sulcipennis insecto descomponedor de materia orgánica en bosques naturales y se presentó en forma de contagio en surcos de maíz cercano a bosque. Palabras clave: Plaga, bosque, maíz. Strigoderma sulcipennis Burmeister 1844 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the corn cops in Valparaiso, Zacatecas, México ABSTRACT. In an area of corn located in the municipality of Valparaiso, Zacatecas, an unknown insect was presented in the region, so this research aims to taxonomically locate the pest insect that was presented, and observe its spatial arrangement. It was determined that the defoliator insect that was presented was Strigoderma sulcipennis organic matter decomposing insect in forests. and that it appeared in the form of contagion in corn furrows near the forest. Keywords: Pest, forest, corn INTRODUCCIÓN Los escarabajos fitófagos de la familia Scarabaeidae son un grupo diverso que se caracteriza por ser de gran importancia económica y ecológica, debido a que desempeñan funciones importantes dentro de las comunidades bióticas por su papel en la polinización, la degradación y reciclaje de la materia orgánica (Morón 1985).
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity

    The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity

    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
  • Larvae of Ataenius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae

    Larvae of Ataenius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae

    Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 57—68, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 Larvae ofAtaenius (Coleóptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae): Generic characteristics and species descriptions José R. VERDÚ and E duardo GALANTE Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain Key words.Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius, larvae, description, key, dung beetles, turfgrass beetles, taxonomy Abstract. We compared the larval morphology of the genera Ataenius and Aphodius. The third larval instars of five Ataenius species: Ataenius opatrinus Harold, A. picinus Harold, A. platensis (Blanchard), A. simulator Harold and A. strigicauda Bates, are described or redescribed and illustrated. The most important morphological characteristics of the larvae of Ataenius are found in the respiratory plate of thoracic spiracle, the setation of venter of the last abdominal segment, the setation of the epicranial region and the morphology of the epipharynx. A key to larvae of the known species of Ataenius is included. INTRODUCTION del Sacramento (Uruguay). For the purpose of laboratory studies, a total of 10 to 20 adult specimens of each species were The genus Ataenius Harold comprises 320 species, of kept in cylindrical plastic breeding cages (20 cm high, 10 cm which 228 species are found in America, 49 in Australia, wide) with moist soil and dry cow dung from which they had 11 in Africa, 6 in East Asia, 2 in Madagascar, and single been collected. The lid was an opening (6 cm diameter) covered species in India, Sri Lanka, Turkestan, Japan, Hawaii and with gauze screen. These breeding cages were maintained in an Sumatra, respectively (Dellacasa, 1987). Despite the rich­ environmental chamber at 25 : 20°C (L : D), 80 ± 5% RH, with ness of this genus and its worldwide distribution, the lar­ a photoperiod of 15 : 9 (L : D).
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of

    Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of

    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
  • Check List of the Rutelinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) of Oceania

    Check List of the Rutelinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) of Oceania

    CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS BERNICE P. BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS VOLUME XI, NUMBER 2 HONOLULU, HAWAII PUBLISHED BY THE MUSJ-:UM 1935 CHECK LIST OF THE RUTELINAE (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE) OF OCEANIA By FRIEDRICH OHAUS MAINZ, GERMANY BIOLOGY The RuteIinae are plant feeders. In Parastasia the beetle (imago) visits flowers, and the grub (larva) lives in dead trunks of more or less hard wood. In Anomala the beetle is a leaf feeder, and the grub lives in the earth, feeding on the roots of living plants. In Adoretus the beetle feeds on flowers and leaves; the grub lives in the earth and feeds upon the roots of living plants. In some species of Anornala and Adoretus, both beetles and grubs are noxious to culti­ vated plants, and it has been observed that eggs or young grubs of these species have been transported in the soil-wrapping around roots or parts of roots of such plants as the banana, cassava, and sugar cane. DISTRIBUTION With the exception of two species, the Rutelinae found on the continent of Australia (including Tasmania) belong to the subtribe Anoplognathina. The first exception is Anomala (Aprosterna) antiqua Gyllenhal (australasiae Blackburn), found in northeast Queensland in cultivated places near the coast. This species is abundant from British India and southeast China in the west to New Guinea in the east, stated to be noxious here and there to cultivated plants. It was probably brought to Queensland by brown or white men, as either eggs or young grubs in soil around roots of bananas, cassava, or sugar cane.
  • Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae* ) in Agroecological Systems of Northern Cauca, Colombia

    Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae* ) in Agroecological Systems of Northern Cauca, Colombia

    Pardo-Locarno et al.: White Grub Complex in Agroecological Systems 355 STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE WHITE GRUB COMPLEX (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE* ) IN AGROECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS OF NORTHERN CAUCA, COLOMBIA LUIS CARLOS PARDO-LOCARNO1, JAMES MONTOYA-LERMA2, ANTHONY C. BELLOTTI3 AND AART VAN SCHOONHOVEN3 1Vegetales Orgánicos C.T.A. 2Departmento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Apartado Aéreo 25360, Cali, Colombia 3Parque Científico Agronatura, CIAT, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical Apartado Aéreo, 6713 Cali, Colombia ABSTRACT The larvae of some species of Scarabaeidae, known locally as “chisas” (whitegrubs), are impor- tant pests in agricultural areas of the Cauca, Colombia. They form a complex consisting of many species belonging to several genera that affect the roots of commercial crops. The objec- tive of the present study was to identify the members of the complex present in two localities (Caldono and Buenos Aires) and collect basic information on their biology, economic impor- tance, and larval morphology. The first of two types of sampling involved sampling adults in light traps installed weekly throughout one year. The second method involved larval collec- tions in plots of cassava, pasture, coffee, and woodland. Each locality was visited once per month and 10 samples per plot were collected on each occasion, with each sample from a quad- rants 1 m2 by 15 cm deep, during 1999-2000. Light traps collected 12,512 adults belonging to 45 species and 21 genera of Scarabaeidae within the subfamilies Dynastinae, Melolonthinae, and Rutelinae. Members of the subfamily Dynastinae predominated with 48% of the species (mostly Cyclocephala), followed in decreasing order by Melolonthinae (35%) and Rutelinae (15%, principally Anomala).
  • Rvk-Diss Digi

    Rvk-Diss Digi

    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Quick Guide for the Identification Of

    Quick Guide for the Identification Of

    Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea Mallory Hagadorn Dr. Dana L. Price Department of Biological Sciences Salisbury University This document is a pictorial reference of Maryland Scarabaeoidea genera (and sometimes species) that was created to expedite the identification of Maryland Scarabs. Our current understanding of Maryland Scarabs comes from “An Annotated Checklist of the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Maryland” (Staines 1984). Staines reported 266 species and subspecies using literature and review of several Maryland Museums. Dr. Price and her research students are currently conducting a bioinventory of Maryland Scarabs that will be used to create a “Taxonomic Guide to the Scarabaeoidea of Maryland”. This will include dichotomous keys to family and species based on historical reports and collections from all 23 counties in Maryland. This document should be cited as: Hagadorn, M.A. and D.L. Price. 2012. Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea. Salisbury University. Pp. 54. Questions regarding this document should be sent to: Dr. Dana L. Price - [email protected] **All pictures within are linked to their copyright holder. Table of Contents Families of Scarabaeoidea of Maryland……………………………………... 6 Geotrupidae……………………………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Bolboceratinae……………………………………………… 7 Genus Bolbocerosoma………………………………………… 7 Genus Eucanthus………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Geotrupinae………………………………………………… 8 Genus Geotrupes………………………………………………. 8 Genus Odonteus...……………………………………………… 9 Glaphyridae..............................................................................................
  • Insect Classification Standards 2020

    Insect Classification Standards 2020

    RECOMMENDED INSECT CLASSIFICATION FOR UGA ENTOMOLOGY CLASSES (2020) In an effort to standardize the hexapod classification systems being taught to our students by our faculty in multiple courses across three UGA campuses, I recommend that the Entomology Department adopts the basic system presented in the following textbook: Triplehorn, C.A. and N.F. Johnson. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont CA, 864 pp. This book was chosen for a variety of reasons. It is widely used in the U.S. as the textbook for Insect Taxonomy classes, including our class at UGA. It focuses on North American taxa. The authors were cautious, presenting changes only after they have been widely accepted by the taxonomic community. Below is an annotated summary of the T&J (2005) classification. Some of the more familiar taxa above the ordinal level are given in caps. Some of the more important and familiar suborders and families are indented and listed beneath each order. Note that this is neither an exhaustive nor representative list of suborders and families. It was provided simply to clarify which taxa are impacted by some of more important classification changes. Please consult T&J (2005) for information about taxa that are not listed below. Unfortunately, T&J (2005) is now badly outdated with respect to some significant classification changes. Therefore, in the classification standard provided below, some well corroborated and broadly accepted updates have been made to their classification scheme. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this classification.