DOCSLIB.ORG

Kettle Creek Source Protection Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kettle Creek Source Protection Area Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Lake Erie Source Protection Region ......................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Grand River Source Protection Area ......................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Population, Population Density and Future Projections ............................................. 2-2 2.4 Physiography .......................................................................................................... 2-11 2.4.1 Dundalk Till Plain ..................................................................................... 2-11 2.4.2 Stratford Till Plain .................................................................................... 2-11 2.4.3 Hillsburg Sandhills ................................................................................... 2-12 2.4.4 Guelph Drumlin Field ............................................................................... 2-12 2.4.5 Horseshoe Moraines ............................................................................... 2-12 2.4.6 Waterloo Hills .......................................................................................... 2-13 2.4.7 Flamborough Plain .................................................................................. 2-13 2.4.8 Norfolk Sand Plain ................................................................................... 2-13 2.4.9 Oxford Till Plain ....................................................................................... 2-14 2.4.10 Mount Elgin Ridges ................................................................................. 2-14 2.4.11 Haldimand Clay Plain .............................................................................. 2-14 2.5 Ground Surface Topography ................................................................................... 2-16 2.5.1 Bedrock Topography ............................................................................... 2-16 2.6 Geology .................................................................................................................. 2-20 2.6.1 Bedrock Geology ..................................................................................... 2-20 2.6.2 Queenston Formation .............................................................................. 2-20 2.6.3 Clinton–Cataract Group ........................................................................... 2-20 2.6.4 Gasport Formation................................................................................... 2-21 2.6.5 Goat Island Formation ............................................................................. 2-21 2.6.6 Eramosa Formation ................................................................................. 2-21 2.6.7 Guelph Formation .................................................................................... 2-21 2.6.8 Salina Formation ..................................................................................... 2-22 2.6.9 Bass Islands–Bertie Formation ................................................................ 2-22 2.6.10 Bois Blanc Formation .............................................................................. 2-22 2.6.11 Oriskany Formation ................................................................................. 2-22 2.6.12 Onondaga – Amherstburg Formation ...................................................... 2-22 2.6.13 Bedrock Surface ...................................................................................... 2-23 2.7 Quaternary Geology ................................................................................................ 2-23 2.8 Groundwater ........................................................................................................... 2-29 August 16, 2019 TOC-1 Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report 2.8.1 Hydrogeology .......................................................................................... 2-29 2.8.2 Bedrock Aquifers ..................................................................................... 2-29 2.8.3 Overburden Aquifers ............................................................................... 2-30 2.8.4 Regional Groundwater Static Water Levels and Flow Directions ............. 2-30 2.8.5 Specific Capacity ..................................................................................... 2-31 2.8.6 Major Groundwater Recharge Areas ....................................................... 2-34 2.8.7 Major Groundwater Discharge Areas ....................................................... 2-34 2.8.8 Surface and Groundwater Interactions .................................................... 2-34 2.9 Groundwater Quality Across the Watershed ........................................................... 2-36 2.9.1 Regional Groundwater Quality Conditions and Trends ............................ 2-36 2.10 Climate in the Grand River Watershed .................................................................... 2-41 2.10.1 Dundalk Uplands ..................................................................................... 2-41 2.10.2 Huron and South Slopes ......................................................................... 2-41 2.10.3 Lake Erie Counties .................................................................................. 2-43 2.10.4 Precipitation Trends ................................................................................. 2-43 2.10.5 Extreme Weather .................................................................................... 2-44 2.11 Land Cover in the Grand River Watershed ............................................................. 2-44 2.11.1 Forest and Vegetation Cover ................................................................... 2-44 2.11.2 Wetlands ................................................................................................. 2-46 2.12 Surface Water ......................................................................................................... 2-51 2.12.1 Surface Water Characterization ............................................................... 2-51 2.12.2 Surface Water Monitoring ........................................................................ 2-51 2.12.3 Upper Grand River .................................................................................. 2-51 2.12.4 Conestogo River ...................................................................................... 2-53 2.12.5 Speed and Eramosa Rivers ..................................................................... 2-53 2.12.6 Central Grand .......................................................................................... 2-56 2.12.7 Nith River ................................................................................................ 2-57 2.12.8 Whitemans, Fairchild and McKenzie Creeks............................................ 2-59 2.12.9 Lower Grand River .................................................................................. 2-61 2.12.10 Water Control Structures ......................................................................... 2-64 2.13 Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................. 2-66 2.13.1 Upper Grand River .................................................................................. 2-72 2.14 Central Grand River ................................................................................................ 2-73 2.14.1 Conestogo River ...................................................................................... 2-78 2.14.2 Speed River............................................................................................. 2-78 August 16, 2019 TOC-2 Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report 2.14.3 Nith River ................................................................................................ 2-78 2.15 Lower Grand River .................................................................................................. 2-79 2.16 Aquatic Habitat ....................................................................................................... 2-81 2.16.1 Upper Grand River Sub-basin ................................................................. 2-81 2.16.2 Middle Grand River Sub-basin ................................................................. 2-81 2.16.3 Southern Grand River Sub-basin ............................................................. 2-82 2.17 Species at Risk ....................................................................................................... 2-84 2.18 Interactions Between Human and Physical Geography ........................................... 2-87 2.19 Watershed Characterization Data Gaps .................................................................. 2-88 3.0 PART 1 - WATER QUANTITY RISK ASSESSMENT .................................................. 3-1 3.1 Tier 2 Water Budget .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Water Use ................................................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.1 Municipal and First Nations Systems ......................................................... 3-4 3.2.2 Municipal and First Nations Systems outside of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1990 Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan Brendan Ciaran Curran Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Curran, Brendan Ciaran, "Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan" (1990). Master's Theses. 1053. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1053 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN by Brendan Ciaran Curran A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1990 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN Brendan Ciaran Curran, M.S. W estern Michigan University, 1990 West Branch field is a low-relief, NW-SE-trending anticline near the center of the Michigan basin. Since 1934, the Dundee Limestone (Middle Devonian) has produced over 12 million barrels of oil from this field. From core studies, six depositional facies types were recognized in the Dundee. These are dominated by bioclastic carbonate sand facies deposited in normal- marine shelf settings. Although burial cements have occluded some porosity, carbonate sand facies have retained significant primary interparticle porosity and are the most important reservoir rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratford-Conestogo Area, Ontario
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve
    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Collingwood Mb., Lindsay Fm., Stratigraphy and Oil Shale Potential
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • 021-1570 Fnl Rpt 4 Feb 03 LLW Geotech Feas Study.Doc
    Golder Associates Ltd. 2390 Argentia Road Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 5Z7 Telephone: (905) 567-4444 Fax: (905) 567-6561 REPORT ON LLW GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY WESTERN WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY BRUCE SITE TIVERTON, ONTARIO Submitted to: Municipality of Kincardine and Ontario Power Generation Nuclear Waste Management Division 700 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X6 DISTRIBUTION: 4 Copies - Municipality of Kincardine 4 Copies - Ontario Power Generation 2 Copies - Golder Associates Ltd. January 2003 021-1570 OFFICES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, EUROPE, AFRICA, ASIA AND AUSTRALIA January 2003 -i- 021-1570 SUMMARY This report presents the results of an assessment of the geotechnical feasibility of constructing a LLW permanent repository at OPG’s Western Waste Management Facility at the former Bruce Nuclear Power Development site near Tiverton, Ontario (the Bruce Site). The assessment was undertaken as part of activities associated with a Memorandum of Understanding between OPG and the Municipality of Kincardine and considered a number of generic LLW repository concepts previously developed by OPG, specifically: • three near surface concepts involving emplacement of LLW in structural concrete vaults located on ground surface (Covered Above Grade Concrete Vault), in a shallow trench at a depth of about 10 m to 15 m below ground surface (Shallow Concrete Vault) and in a deep trench at a depth of about 25 m below ground surface (Deep Concrete Vault); and • four Rock Cavern Vault concepts involving emplacement of LLW in unlined, mined caverns in the bedrock at a depth of about 50 m to 100 m below ground surface (Shallow Rock Cavern Vault) and at depths of about 200 m to 800 m below ground surface (Deep Rock Cavern Vault) in (i) a thick salt bed, (ii) a low permeability shale sequence, and (iii) a low permeability limestone sequence which were projected to underlie the Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Fish Plan Technical Background Report
    Grand River Conservation Authority Technical Background Report for the Grand River Fisheries Management Plan Draft Report May, 2001 Prepared for: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Prepared by: Jennifer Wright (GRCA) and Jack Imhof (MNR, Fish and Wildlife Branch) With the co-operation and support from the Grand River Fisheries Management Plan Implementation Committee. Brantford Steelheaders Caledonia Bait & Tackle Department of Fisheries & Oceans Canada Dunnville Hunters and Anglers Friends of the Grand River Izaak Walton Fly Fishing Club Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters Ontario Steelheaders Ontario Streams Six Nations (Wildlife Management) Trout Unlimited Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 Preamble 1 1.1 Purpose of the Document 1 1.2 Purpose of the Plan 1 1.3 Scope of the Plan 2 1.4 Relationship of this Plan to the Overall Grand Strategy 3 1.5 General Principles 3 1.6 Products Achieved 4 2.0 PROCESS 7 Preamble 7 2.1 Development of the Management Plan Team and Participants 8 2.2 Public Process 10 2.3 Technical Information 12 2.4 Finalizing the Plan and Moving it Forward 13 2.5 Development of the Structure of the Implementation Committee 14 3.0 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND OVERVIEW 16 Preamble 16 3.1 The Grand River Watershed Circa 1600 – 1780 16 3.2 Changes Between 1780 and 1930 18 3.3 Changes Between 1930 and the Present 22 3.4 History of Fisheries Management 25 3.5 Legislative History of Fisheries Management in Ontario and the Grand River Basin 26 4.0 FISHERIES/WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION 36 4.1 The Watershed Biophysical System
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Grand River Watershed an Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River Watershed
    Geology of the Grand River Watershed An Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River watershed Prepared by Bob Janzen, GIT December 2018 i Table of Contents List of Maps ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 1 Algonquin Arch ......................................................................................................... 2 Bedrock Cuestas ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Bedrock Surface ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Bedrock Formations of the Grand River watershed ........................................... 8 2.2.1 Queenston Formation ................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Clinton–Cataract Group ............................................................................. 15 2.2.2.1 Whirlpool Formation ............................................................................ 16 2.2.2.2 Manitoulin Formation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Source Protection Area: Assessment Report
    Grand River Source Protection Area Approved Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ........................................................................ 2-5 2.1 Lake Erie Source Protection Region ........................................................... 2-5 2.2 Grand River Source Protection Area ........................................................... 2-5 2.3 Population, Population Density and Future Projections ............................... 2-6 2.4 Physiography ............................................................................................ 2-16 2.4.1 Dundalk Till Plain ....................................................................... 2-16 2.4.2 Stratford Till Plain ...................................................................... 2-16 2.4.3 Hillsburg Sandhills ..................................................................... 2-17 2.4.4 Guelph Drumlin Field ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.5 Horseshoe Moraines ................................................................. 2-17 2.4.6 Waterloo Hills ............................................................................ 2-18 2.4.7 Flamborough Plain .................................................................... 2-18 2.4.8 Norfolk Sand Plain ..................................................................... 2-18 2.4.9 Oxford Till Plain ......................................................................... 2-19 2.4.10 Mount Elgin Ridges ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigation 15 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY of BARRY COUNTY, MICHIGAN
    Geological Survey Ordovician System .......................................................10 Report of Investigation 15 Cincinnatian Series...................................................10 Trenton Group ..........................................................10 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF BARRY COUNTY, Black River Group ....................................................10 MICHIGAN St. Peter Sandstone .................................................11 by Prairie du Chien Group.............................................11 Richard T. Lilienthal Cambrian System.........................................................11 Illustrations by Author Trempealeau Formation ...........................................11 Lansing Munising Formation ..................................................12 1974 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY .............................................12 POROUS INTERVALS....................................................12 Contents REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING ...................16 FOREWORD......................................................................2 ABSTRACT .......................................................................2 Illustrations INTRODUCTION ...............................................................3 GEOLOGIC SETTING.......................................................3 Figures MINERAL RESOURCES...................................................3 Index map ...................................................................................2 Surface Minerals ............................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Your Use of This Ontario Geological Survey Document (The “Content”) Is Governed by the Terms Set out on This Page (“Terms of Use”)
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan
    Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan AUTHORS Paul A. Catacosinos David B. Westjohn [Professor Emeritus, United States Geological Survey Delta College [Associate Professor (Adjunct), University Center, MI 48710] Michigan State University] 1001 Martingale Lane SE 6520 Mercantile Way #6 Albuquerque, NM 87123-4305 Lansing, MI 48911 William B. Harrison, III Mark S. Wollensak, CPG Professor, Department of Geosciences EarthFax Engineering, Inc. Western Michigan University 15266 Ann Drive Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Bath, MI 48808 Robert F. Reynolds Reynolds Geological, L.L.C. 504 Hall Blvd. Mason, MI, 48854 Bulletin 8 Lansing, Michigan, 2001 Geological Survey Division and the Michigan Basin Geological Society State of Michigan John Engler, Govenor Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Russell J. Harding, Director MDEQ Geological Survey Division, P O Box 30256, Lansing, MI 48909-7756 On the Internet @ HTTP://W WW .DEQ.STATE.MI.US/GSD Printed by Authority of Act 451, PA 1994 as amended The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) will not discriminate Total number of copies printed ........... 1,000 against any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, Total cost: .................................... $2,500.00 color, marital status, disability or political beliefs. Directed questions or concerns to the Cost per copy: ..................................... $2.50 MDEQ Office of Personnel Services, P.O. Box 30473, and Lansing, MI 48909 Page 2 - - Stratigraphic Lexicon for Michigan DEDICATION The authors gratefully dedicate this volume to the memories of Helen M. Martin and Muriel Tara Straight. This volume would not have been possible without their monumental reference work Bulletin 50, An Index of Helen Melville Martin Michigan Geology published by the Michigan Geological Survey in 1956.
    [Show full text]