DOCSLIB.ORG

March 2013 a Rch, Truss & Bea M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
March 2013 a Rch, Truss & Bea M THE GRAND A RCH, TRUSS & BEA Dundalk R IVER WA M : T ERSHED HERI Grand Valley T Fergus A G E BRID Elmira Guelph G E Waterloo I NVEN Kitchener Cambridge New Hamburg T ORY LAKE ONTARIO Brantford Caledonia environment.uwaterloo.ca/research/hrc/ Dunnville Tillsonburg MARCH 2013 Simcoe Aylmer Graphic design by Amy Calder, [email protected] LAKE ERIE Thank you to the Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation for their generous support without which the design and printing of this report would not have been possible. THE GRAND A RCH, TRUSS & BEA Dundalk R IVER WA M : T ERSHED HERI Grand Valley T Fergus A G E BRID Elmira Guelph G E Waterloo I NVEN Kitchener Cambridge New Hamburg T ORY LAKE ONTARIO Brantford Caledonia environment.uwaterloo.ca/research/hrc/ Dunnville Tillsonburg MARCH 2013 Simcoe Aylmer LAKE ERIE THE GRAND A RCH, TRUSS & BEA Dundalk R IVER WA M ARCH, TRUSS & BEAM : T ERSHED HERI THE GRAND RIVER WATERSHED HERITAGE BRIDGE INVENTORY Grand Valley T Fergus A G E BRID Elmira Guelph G E Waterloo I NVEN Kitchener Cambridge New Hamburg T ORY LAKE ONTARIO Brantford Caledonia Dunnville Tillsonburg MARCH 2013 Simcoe Aylmer LAKE ERIE MARCH 2013 ARCH, TRUSS & BEAM: The Grand River Watershed Heritage Bridge Inventory Prepared By Lindsay Benjamin, Primary Author, Heritage Resources Centre Dr. Barbara Veale, Contributing Editor, Grand River Conservation Authority Dr. Robert Shipley, Editor, Heritage Resources Centre Kayla Jonas Galvin, Editor, Heritage Resources Centre Melissa Davies, Researcher/Writer, Heritage Resources Centre Funding Provided By Government of Ontario Grand River Conservation Authority Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation March 2013 Arch, Truss & Beam: The Grand River Watershed Heritage Bridge Inventory PREFACE Bridges – primarily road but also railway– are important cultural features within the Grand River watershed and support the national status of the Grand River and its major tributaries as Canadian Heritage Rivers. Some, such as the timber covered bridge of West Montrose, are unique survivors of once common designs. A few, such as the massive, nine-span concrete bowstring bridge across the Grand River at Caledonia, are visually arresting in their scale and form. Yet most of the structures in the watershed are “ordinary” steel or concrete bridges. However, close examination can reveal that they are anything but ordinary in what they can tell us about the past and present. And many, with steel trusses or concrete arches rising above the land have an aesthetic quality. Bridges, like people, have finite lives. Increased traffic loads, salt damage, and freeze/thaw cycles are some of the common factors affecting bridge life. These events are predictable and the loss of key bridges can be planned for. This is why an inventory, like this one of the Grand River watershed, is so important. The inventory can highlight structures before they become a crisis. With pro-active planning it may be possible to reuse the bridge in less strenuous locations, sympathetically repair rather than replace the bridge, or encourage the design of a new structure to be of equal visual quality to the one it replaced. But the inventory is not only for management. For those that have a hankering for old bridges, Arch, Truss & Beam: The Grand River Watershed Heritage Bridge Inventory is a gazetteer for anyone that wants to explore the area. You can discover parts of Ontario and the adjoining resources you never knew existed. Christopher Andreae, PhD Heritage Resources Centre ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This inventory was made possible through the guidance, knowledge, expertise and hard work of a number of groups and individuals, most notably including: Government of Ontario for generously funding this project. Grand River Conservation Authority for supporting and funding this work. Special thank you to Dr. Barbara Veale, Jeff Pitcher and Phil Lenoir. Grand Strategy Heritage Working Group members, specifically: Dr. Barbara Veale, Warren Stauch, Eva Salter, Pat Salter, Karen Richardson and Jan Liggett for providing invaluable and intimate knowledge of the cultural heritage resources found throughout the Grand River watershed. Grand River Watershed Heritage Bridge Inventory Steering Committee members: Dr. Barbara Veale, Dr. Robert Shipley, Karla Barboza, Chris Mahood, Bert Duclos, Dr. Chris Andreae and Kayla Jonas Galvin for guiding the proj- ect’s methodology. Waterloo Regional Heritage Foundation for their generous support without which the design and printing of this report would not have been possible. Lindsay Benjamin for managing, coordinating and publishing this inventory. Melissa Davies for her invaluable research, photography, and editorial contributions. Kayla Jonas Galvin for her expertise and editing of this report. Marg Rowell for her expertise in evaluating cultural heritage resources. Amy Calder for designing this report. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Humber Watershed Alliance, Heritage Subcommittee for their guidance and seminal work, Crossing the Humber: The Humber River Heritage Bridge Inventory. All watershed municipalities and staff members for participating in this inventory and sharing information on the bridges under their jurisdiction. Such willingness to collaborate ensured the comprehensiveness of this inventory. Members of the public and local residents who so willing provided information invaluable to the determination of cultural heritage value of many bridges included in this inventory, including: Pat Mestern, Madelyn Verspagen, Sharon Anderson, Nathan Holth, Rob Dutton and Sean Young. Heritage Resources Centre TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Watershed Map ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Project Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Evolution of Bridge Building in the Grand River Watershed ................................................. 6 2.0 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Scope of focus ................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Limitations ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.0 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Bridge Identification ................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Field Inspection ............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Archival Research ........................................................................................................................................ 12 3.4 Community Knowledge ........................................................................................................................... 12 4.0 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Bridge Summaries ................................................................................................................................................ 15 5.0 Results .............................................................................................................................................................................. 356 6.0 Future Opportunities ............................................................................................................................................... 361 7.0 Next Steps ...................................................................................................................................................................... 361 8.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................................... 362 9.0 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................. 363 Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................. 365 Appendix A: Heritage bridge maps by municipality .......................................................................... 366 Appendix B: Field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 a AA
    RAIL OPERATORS' REPORTING MARKS February 24, 2010 A AA ANN ARBOR AAM ASHTOLA AND ALLEGHENY MOUNTAIN AB ATLANTIC AND BIRMINGHAM RAILWAY ABA ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND ATLANTIC ABB AKRON AND BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD ABC ATLANTA, BIRMINGHAM AND COAST ABL ALLEYTON AND BIG LAKE ABLC ABERNETHY-LOUGHEED LOGGING COMPANY ABMR ALBION MINES RAILWAY ABR ARCADIA AND BETSEY RIVER ABS ABILENE AND SOUTHERN ABSO ABBEVILLE SOUTHERN RAILWAY ABYP ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP. AC ALGOMA CENTRAL ACAL ATLANTA AND CHARLOTTE AIR LINE ACC ALABAMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ACE AMERICAN COAL ENTERPRISES ACHB ALGOMA CENTRAL AND HUDSON BAY ACL ATLANTIC COAST LINE ACLC ANGELINA COUNTY LUMBER COMPANY ACM ANACONDA COPPER MINING ACR ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD ACRR ASTORIA AND COLUMBIA RIVER ACRY AMES AND COLLEGE RAILWAY ACTY AUSTIN CITY RAILROAD ACY AKRON, CANTON AND YOUNGSTOWN ADIR ADIRONDACK RAILWAY ADPA ADDISON AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILWAY AE ALTON AND EASTERN AEC ATLANTIC AND EAST CAROLINA AER ANNAPOLIS AND ELK RIDGE RAILROAD AF AMERICAN FORK RAILROAD AG ATLANTIC AND GULF RAILROAD AGR ALDER GULCH RAILROAD AGP ARGENTINE AND GRAY'S PEAK AGS ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN AGW ATLANTIC AND GREAT WESTERN AHR ALASKA HOME RAILROAD AHUK AHUKINI TERMINAL RAILWAY AICO ASHLAND IRON COMPANY AJ ARTEMUS-JELLICO RAILROAD AK ALLEGHENY AND KINZUA RAILROAD AKC ALASKA CENTRAL AKN ALASKA NORTHERN AL ALMANOR ALBL ALAMEDA BELT LINE ALBP ALBERNI PACIFIC ALBR ALBION RIVER RAILROAD ALC ALLEN LUMBER COMPANY ALCR ALBION LUMBER COMPANY RAILROAD ALGC ALLEGHANY CENTRAL (MD) ALLC ALLEGANY CENTRAL (NY) ALM ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER – NOVEMBER 2018 189 Water Street, Guelph, Ontario N1G 1B3 Phone: 519-824-0028 Fax: 519-824-7067 Website
    École John McCrae School NEWSLETTER – NOVEMBER 2018 189 Water Street, Guelph, Ontario N1G 1B3 Phone: 519-824-0028 Fax: 519-824-7067 Website: www.ugdsb.on.ca/jmc/ Principal: Leslie Newman Vice Principal: Chad Reay Office Co-ordinator: Kathy Lambkin PRINCIPAL’S MESSAGE Progress reports will be arriving home on November 20th. These reports do not contain marks and are a mid-term check-in. We hope that they will help you and your child have a discussion about what they are doing well at in school and what things they can work on in order to help them improve. On the evening of November 29th (and during the day of November 30th), parents will be invited to meet with their child’s teacher. Please reserve those dates. Interviews may be booked online at https://webapps.ugdsb.on.ca/InterviewSchedule/Account/Login starting at 4pm on November 20th. This site will be available up until noon on the 29th. More information will come home in the progress report with interview booking instructions. November 9th will be the day that we hold our Remembrance Day Service. As always, it will be held at the John McCrae House and we expect all of our students will participate. We invite any parent who wishes to attend to join us. You may choose to walk down with our students or join us at John McCrae House. We really hope that our service helps students understand the sacrifice of the many men and women who have served this country to protect our freedom. We hope too, that our students learn to understand how they are very lucky to live in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorializing Lieutenant-Colonel John Mccrae Civic Commemoration and the 100Th Anniversary of “In Flanders Fields” Debra Nash-Chambers
    Canadian Military History Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 12 7-6-2015 Memorializing Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae Civic Commemoration and the 100th Anniversary of “In Flanders Fields” Debra Nash-Chambers Recommended Citation Debra Nash-Chambers (2015) "Memorializing Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae Civic Commemoration and the 100th Anniversary of “In Flanders Fields”," Canadian Military History: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 12. Available at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol24/iss1/12 This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Memorializing Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae FEATURE Memorializing Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae Civic Commemoration and the 100th Anniversary of “In Flanders Fields” DEBRA NASH-CHAMBERS Abstract: In 2015 Lieutenant-Colonel John McCrae’s hometown of Guelph, Ontario and the nation will memorialize McCrae and commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the writing of his poem “In Flanders FieldsThe poem was penned on May 3rd, 1915 during the Second Battle of Ypres following the death of his friend Lieutenant Alexis Helmer. His poem was the inspiration for the use of the poppy as an international symbol of remembrance. John McCrae was a multi-dimensional man with a complex personal history. McCrae died overseas on January 28, 1918. This year’s civic celebrations will pay tribute to McCrae— soldier, poet and physician. In Flanders fields the poppies blow Between the crosses, row on row, That mark our place; and in the sky The larks still bravely singing fly Scarce heard amid the guns below.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Guelph Visitors' Guide 2002, We Invite You to Participate in All That Guelph Has to Offer
    DISCOVER GUELPH VISITORS’ GUIDE 2002 th Anniversary 182 175 A 27-2002 A GREAT PLACE TO VISITISIT SINCEINCE 1827 G UELPH, ONTARIO, CANADA elcome to the University of Guelph, one of WOntario’s most beautiful campuses. Modern and traditional architecture blends with lush green landscapes, highlighted by a 408-acre (165-hectare) arboretum, inviting visitors year-round. Attend any of our vibrant arts events such as weekly concerts, drama productions and art exhibits. Our conference and hospitality facilities are second to none. Guelph has built a solid reputation as one of Canada’s leading teaching and research universities. Make sure to visit the University of Guelph – a civic, provincial and national treasure. Communications & Public Affairs • Arboretum • Office of Research Hospitality Services • Admission Services 519-824-4120 or visit our Web site at http://www.uoguelph.ca Call 519-658-6656 www.reidsheritagegroup.com Semi-Detached • Freehold Townhomes • Condominium Townhomes Single Family • Retirement • 1,000 to 3,500 sq ft The Good Life Begins At Your Doorstep! Step up to a Brooklyn Home! www.reidsheritagehomes.com www.brooklynhomesinc.com Life as it should be! A proud tradition of home building! www.sherwoodhomesltd.com www.norrichwest.com Kitchener • Waterloo • Cambridge • Guelph • London • Huntsville • Collingwood BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS OF FINE COMMUNITIES DISCOVER GUELPH VISITORS’ GUIDE 2002 GGUELPHUELPH IS IS IIDEALLYDEALLY LLOCATEDOCATED FORFOR YYOUROUR NNEXTEXT CCONFERENCEONFERENCE,, TTOURNAMENTOURNAMENT OR OR CCORPORATEORPORATE
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Outlines of Railways in Southwestern Ontario
    UCRS Newsletter • July 1990 Toronto & Guelph Railway Note: The Toronto & Goderich Railway Company was estab- At the time of publication of this summary, Pat lished in 1848 to build from Toronto to Guelph, and on Scrimgeour was on the editorial staff of the Upper to Goderich, on Lake Huron. The Toronto & Guelph Canada Railway Society (UCRS) newsletter. This doc- was incorporated in 1851 to succeed the Toronto & ument is a most useful summary of the many pioneer Goderich with powers to build a line only as far as Guelph. lines that criss-crossed south-western Ontario in the th th The Toronto & Guelph was amalgamated with five 19 and early 20 centuries. other railway companies in 1854 to form the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada. The GTR opened the T&G line in 1856. 32 - Historical Outlines of Railways Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada in Southwestern Ontario The Grand Trunk was incorporated in 1852 with au- BY PAT SCRIMGEOUR thority to build a line from Montreal to Toronto, assum- ing the rights of the Montreal & Kingston Railway Company and the Kingston & Toronto Railway Com- The following items are brief histories of the railway pany, and with authority to unite small railway compa- companies in the area between Toronto and London. nies to build a main trunk line. To this end, the follow- Only the railways built in or connecting into the area ing companies were amalgamated with the GTR in are shown on the map below, and connecting lines in 1853 and 1854: the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Toronto, Hamilton; and London are not included.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent
    THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM-KENT CHATHAM-KENT COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CHATHAM-KENT CIVIC CENTRE February 14, 2011 4:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Mayor called the meeting to Order. Present were: Mayor Randy Hope, Councillors Bondy, Brown, Crew, Faas, Fluker, Gilbert, Herman, King, Myers, Leclair, Parsons, Pinsonneault, Robertson, Stirling, Sulman, Vercouteren, and Wesley 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST (DIRECT OR INDIRECT) AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 3. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 4. ADJOURNMENT OF CLOSED SESSION 5. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA The Clerk noted that administration was requesting that Item #14(f) be postponed to a later date pending further information from administration. Councillor Pinsonneault moved, Councillor Stirling seconded: “That Item #14(f) be postponed to a later date pending further information from administration.” The Mayor put the Motion Motion Carried 6. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST (DIRECT OR INDIRECT) AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Councillor Brown declared a pecuniary interest with regard to Items 12(a) and 14(f). 7. RECOGNITION (a) Recognition of Deb Veccia, Supervisor, Chatham Parks by the Accessibility Advisory Committee for her Dedication to Accessibility Ralph Rholes, Chair of the Accessibility Advisory Committee presented Deb Veccia with Chatham-Kent Council at its meeting held on February 14, 2011 Page 1 of 45 a certificate of recognition for her dedication to accessibility. 8. PLANNING SERVICES The Clerk reviewed the procedure to be followed during the planning meeting. Mr. Robert Brown, Storey Samways Planning Ltd. explained for members of the public that if any person or public body that files an appeal of a decision of The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent in respect of a proposed planning application does not make any oral submission at the public meeting or any written submission to The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent before the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is approved, the Ontario Municipal Board may dismiss all or part of the appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections a Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?
    Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Authored by Anthony Cardillo Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Aleksander Essex, PhD., P.Eng. Western University, Canada Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Western University, Canada Nicholas Akinyokun School of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne, Australia PUBLICATION NOTE An extended abstract of this report was presented at the Fourth International Joint Conference on Elec‐ tronic Voting (E‐Vote‐ID) in Bregenz, Austria, October, 2019. It won the Best Paper Award in the Trackon Security, Usability and Technical Issues. Cite the extended abstract as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?. In: Krimmer R. et al. (eds) Electronic Voting. E‐Vote‐ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11759, pp. 67‐82, 2019. Cite this full report as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Whisper Lab Research Report, Western University, 2020. Available online: https://whisperlab.org/ontario-online.pdf Acknowledgments We are grateful to a many individuals in Ontario and beyond for helpful conversations and important in‐ sights. Special thanks to Jane Buchanan for her tireless effort searching municipal documents. Thanks to Joe Abley, Richard Ackerman, Tony Adams, Matt Bernhard, Kevin Creechan, Faye and Ron Ego, Josh Franklin, Nicole Goodman, Jared Marcotte, Beata Martin‐Rozumiłowicz, John Meraglia, Scott Richie, Matt Saunders, Cameron Shelley, Ken Strauss, Dave Suffling, Vanessa Teague, Anne Walkinshaw, Susan Watson, Uli Watkiss.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Contacts
    COMMUNITY CONTACTS PLEASE NOTE: It is the responsibility of community groups/organizations listed in the Community Contacts section to contact Community and Social Services at 519-837-5618 regarding any updates and/or corrections to their listings. Arts Guelph Chamber of 519-822-8081 guelphchamber.com Commerce [email protected] Ed Video Media Arts 519-836-9811 edvideo.org Centre [email protected] Guelph Independent 519-836-1812 guelphindependentliving.org Living ext 33 [email protected] Guelph Arts Council 519-822-7027 guelpharts.ca/guelphartscouncil TTY [email protected] 519-836-5952 Dance Guelph Newcomers’ Club [email protected] Guelph Contemporary 519-780-2220 guelphcontemporarydancefestival.com Guelph-Wellington 519-836-1110 gwwomenincrisis.org Dance Festival [email protected] Women In Crisis Guelph Youth Dance 519-780-2220 guelphyouthdance.ca Guelph-Wellington 519-826-4701 guelphbusiness.com Training Program [email protected] Business Enterprise Centre [email protected] Music La Leche League 519-836-0800 LLLC.ca ES AND INFORMATION AND ES Canada-Guelph [email protected] C CFRU 93.3 FM 519-824-4120 [email protected] x 53502 Out on the Shelf 519-515-0691 outontheshelf.ca [email protected] Guelph Concert Band cba-ontario.ca/guelphconcertband [email protected] Special Olympics 519-843-2559 Guelph Wellington SERVI Guelph Jazz Festival 519-763-4952 guelphjazzfestival.com [email protected] Volunteer Centre of 519-822-0912 volunteerguelphwellington.on.ca Guelph/Wellington
    [Show full text]
  • Stratford-Conestogo Area, Ontario
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Council Correspondence 2020-11-17
    /IS:1><121\ Town of Bracebridge ~ BRACEBRIDGE Council Correspondence The Heart of Muskoka TO: Mayor G. Smith and Members of Town Council S. Rettie, Chief Administrative Officer COPY: Management Team Media FROM: L. McDonald, Director of Corporate Services/Clerk DATE: November 17, 2020 CIRCULATION: Item # Description SECTION “A” – STAFF INFORMATION MEMOS: A1 Nil. SECTION “B” – GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE: Communication from the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, regarding the 2019-2020 B1 Annual Community Report. Communication from Mia Brown, Program Manager, Substance Use and Injury Prevention B2 Program, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, dated November 2020 regarding Simcoe Muskoka Opioid Strategy. Resolution from Matt MacDonald, Director of Corporate Services/City Clerk, City of Belleville, B3 dated November 10, 2020 regarding Proposing Changes to the Municipal Elections Act – Extension of Nomination Period. Resolution from Tanya Daniels, City Clerk, City of Brantford, dated November 12, 2020 B4 regarding Bill 218 – Ranked Ballots for Municipal Elections. Page 1. ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT Medical officer of health + Board Chair message As reported in the 2018-2019 Annual Report, the Board of Health and the What is less visible is our preventive work that sets the stage for good Medical Officer of Health were challenged, like all health units, with the health in the long term, the work that is done in our immunization and province’s plans to transform the public health system. dental programs, and our family health teams. That work has been on hold While we were unclear what the announcement was going to mean for our due to the pandemic, and we now have thousands of children who have future, we began to prepare for the possibility of significant change by both missed their Grade 7 vaccinations, hundreds of low-income families who reviewing our mandate and operations while mounting a vigorous response have been unable to access our dental clinics, and many more families who highlighting the importance of public health.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 TLCI Planning Study Application
    Form Name: 2019 TLCI Planning Study Application Submission Time: October 12, 2018 11:38 am Browser: Chrome 69.0.3497.100 / Windows 7 IP Address: 198.30.186.2 Unique ID: 446136147 Location: 41.650199890137, -81.453300476074 Project Sponsor / Agency Name Village of Grand River Address 205 Singer Avenue Grand River, OH 44045 Contact Name Peter Zahirsky Title Director of Coastal Development (Lake County Ohio Port and Economic Development Authority) Office Phone Number (440) 357-2290 ext. 227 E-mail Address [email protected] Preference for TLCI planning study Either Will Work development Study Name Waterfront Entertainment District Revitalization Total Project Cost 80000 NOACA Funding Requested 80000 Local Funding Committed 0 NOACA may consider partial funding for My agency will not be able to implement the project if provided partial some projects. Please check the funding appropriate box below: Project Location (attach a location map Village of Grand River at the end of the application) Project Study Area (including Grand River's Waterfront Entertainment District, which is bounded on the geographic boundaries) east by River Street, on the north by Henry Street, on the west by Williams Street, and on the south by Olive Street. Detailed Project Description Grand River's Waterfront Entertainment District ("the District") is home to two Northeast Ohio seafood institutions: Pickle Bill's and Brennan's Fish House, but much of the surrounding area has deteriorated. There is also a railroad track that was reactivated in 2016 by a short line railroad, the Grand River Railway ("GRRY") to serve the Morton Salt mine that actually runs directly through the Pickle Bill's parking area, creating a dangerous situation for negative interaction between the train, parked cars, and patrons entering and exiting the restaurant.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study City of London, Ontario
    November 2013 DRAFT REPORT ON Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study City of London, Ontario Submitted to: Don Menard, Heritage Planner City of London 300 Dufferin Avenue, London, Ontario N6B 1Z2 Report Number: 13-1151-0194-1000 Distribution: REPORT 1 copy - City of London 2 e-copies - City of London BLACKFRIARS/PETERSVILLE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY CITY OF LONDON, ONTARIO Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose and Objectives of Study......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Study Approach and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 What is a Heritage Conservation District? ......................................................................................................... 10 2.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]