DOCSLIB.ORG

(Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 ANNEX EN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 Table of Contents 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ............................................................ 10 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme ...................................................................... 10 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ................................................................... 11 3.1 General socio-economic context .................................................................................................. 11 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ..................................................... 11 3.1.2 Demographic situation ............................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.3 Administrative system ............................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.4 Economic Drivers, Productivity and Growth .................................................................................. 15 3.1.5 Labour market ............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.6 Education system ....................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.7 Land use and ownership ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. Performance of the agricultural, forestry and food sectors ............................................. 25 3.2.1 Competitiveness of Agriculture and Food Processing................................................................ 25 3.2.2 Competitiveness of Forestry Sector ................................................................................................... 49 3.2.3 Competitiveness of Fisheries and aquaculture ............................................................................. 52 3.2.4 Human capital and knowledge transfer ........................................................................................... 53 3.2.5 Agriculture and forestry education .................................................................................................... 54 3.2.6 Advisory services ....................................................................................................................................... 56 3.2.5 Access to credit ........................................................................................................................................... 58 3.3. Environment and land management ......................................................................................... 59 3.3.1 Risks of land abandonment and marginalisation ......................................................................... 59 3.3.2 Climate change impact on agriculture, needs for adaptation and mitigation measures ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 3.3.3 Biodiversity especially as linked with agriculture and forestry ............................................ 62 3.3.4 High nature value farming (HNVF)..................................................................................................... 63 3.3.5 Water quality and its link with agriculture ..................................................................................... 64 3.3.6 Greenhouse gas emission ....................................................................................................................... 65 3.3.7 Soil quality and erosion ........................................................................................................................... 66 3.3.8 Renewable energy...................................................................................................................................... 67 3.3.9 Use of pesticides and fertilisers ........................................................................................................... 69 3.4. Rural Economy .................................................................................................................................. 69 3.4.1 Rural Tourism potential .......................................................................................................................... 72 3.4.2 Promotion and development of SME in the rural areas ............................................................ 73 3.4.3 Crafts ................................................................................................................................................................ 74 3.4.4 Provision of services in rural areas .................................................................................................... 75 3.4.5 Infrastructure provision .......................................................................................................................... 76 3.4.6 Cultural heritage and built environment in villages ................................................................... 78 3.5. Preparation and implementation of local development strategies – LEADER .......... 78 As adopted by the Commission Implementing Decision C(2015)760 of 13.02.2015 and amended by the Commission Implementing Decision C(2019)666 of 24.01.2019 2 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 3.6. Context related baseline indicators .......................................................................................... 81 4. STRENGHTS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS .................................... 91 4.1. Agriculture, forestry and food industry ................................................................................... 92 4.2. Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 93 4.3. Rural Economy and Quality of Life ............................................................................................. 94 5. MAIN RESULTS OF PREVIOUS INTERVENTION ................................................................ 96 5.1. National support policy for agriculture and rural development. ................................... 96 5.2. Overview of EU assistance............................................................................................................. 98 5.2.1 Overview of IPA-TAIB and TAIEX assistance ................................................................................. 98 5.2.2 Overview of IPARD I implementation ............................................................................................... 99 5.3. Overview of bilateral and multilateral assistance ............................................................ 102 5.4. Lessons learnt from past EU, bilateral and multilateral assistance ........................... 105 5.5. Lessons learnt from IPARD I implementation .................................................................... 105 6. DESCRIPTION OF THE STRATEGY ...................................................................................... 108 6.1. Description of the Programme rural development strategy ......................................... 108 6.1.1 National Strategy Objectives for Agriculture and Rural Development ............................ 108 6.1.2 IPA II Objectives for Agriculture and Rural Development Policy Area ............................ 111 6.2. Identification of the needs and summary of overall strategy ....................................... 112 6.2.1. Enhancing farm viability and competitiveness of agriculture and food processing . 120 6.2.2 Restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems dependent on agriculture and forestry ................................................................................................................................................................... 121 6.2.3 Promoting balanced territorial development in rural areas ................................................ 122 6.2.4 Transfer of knowledge and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas ......... 123 6.2.5 Horizontal and cross-cutting priorities ......................................................................................... 124 6.3. Consistency between proposed IPARD intervention and Country Strategy Paper (CSP) ........................................................................................................................................................... 124 6.4. Intervention logic of the Programme, measures and quantified targets ................. 127 7. PROGRAMME FINANCIAL PLAN.......................................................................................... 131 7.1. Maximum EU Contribution for IPARD funds 2014-2020, in EUR ................................. 131 7.2 Budget of EU Contribution by measure 2014-2020, in EUR (for monitoring purposes only) ........................................................................................................................................................... 131 7.3 Percentage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acrocephalus, 2010, Letnik 31, Številka
    Acrocephalus 31 (147): 175−179, 2010 A Milestone on the Road to Natura 2000 Mejnik na poti k Naturi 2000 The publication “Important Bird Areas of Macedonia: Sites of Global and European Importance” provides a fascinating insight into the natural and cultural heritage of the country. The approved list of sites now includes a wide variety of landscapes hosting bird species that have become rare or threatened in many parts of Europe. Very important is the fact that only about 21% of the national protected area network overlaps the Important Bird Areas of Macedonia. Now an assessment of the natural assets of Macedonia is available for the first time, based on a systematic approach using the international criteria developed by BirdLife International for the selection of sites under the EU Birds Directive. The first results indicate where the country hosts areas of European and even global importance, where urgent conservation measures are needed, and are excellent guidelines for the rural development and tourism. A wide range of political commitments within the European Union is aimed at preserving ecosystems and biodiversity, with various species protection provisions as well as Special Protection Areas (SPAs) identified under the Birds Directive and Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) identified under the Habitats Directive, both incorporated into the Natura 2000 (N2000) network. The publication of the “Important Bird Areas of Macedonia” prepared by the Macedonian Ecological Society (MES) as a national representative of the BirdLife International’s partnership is the first systematic assessment of Macedonia’s sites based on the internationally recognized criteria to implement the Birds Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep
    Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 3 (2013) 569-581 D DAVID PUBLISHING Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep Cane Koteski, Dushko Josheski, Zlatko Jakovlev, Snezana Bardarova and Vladimir Kitanov Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delchev University of Shtip, Gevgelija 1480, Republic of Macedonia Received: June 15, 2013/Accepted: July 20, 2013/Published: August 25, 2013. Abstract: In this paper it has been investigated the issue of the dynamics of the rural population in villages in the mountainous areas of the municipality of Prilep height distribution of the mountainous villages, the area size, absolute density and agrarian population in hilly-mountainous villages, the distance of the hill-mountain villages of the municipality center and institutional infrastructure hilly-mountainous areas in Prilep. Despite the demographic decline that was made in the past 45 years, the municipality and the country will have even more incentive in the coming years to invest in infrastructure to improve little very bad living conditions and foremost here we think of infrastructure, roads, water drinking, clinics, veterinary stations, public transportation, gas stations, stores, construction of ethnic restaurants and small hotels so that at least the older generations of the cities as the least retirement to spend at home, to create minimum conditions for living and so that villages in hilly and mountainous villages to be attractive to younger generations of the cities and migrant workers from European countries and America Australia frequently to visit home, and to be able to invest in small commercial buildings in the area of tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broj 13 20.12
    ОПШТИНА ДЕЛЧЕВО Градоначалник Ul:,,M.M.Brico,, br. 40, Del~evo tel: 033/413-521 faks: 033/411 550 E-mail:[email protected] SLU@BEN GLASNIK NA OP[TINA DEL^EVO Broj 13 20.12. 2012 godina Slu`ben glasnik na Op{tina Del~evo Ureduva Izleguva po potreba Oddelenie za ~ove~ki resursi, Glasnikot e besplaten pravni i op{tи работи Декември, 2012 Врз основа на член 50 став 1 точка 3 од Законот за локална самоуправа („Сл. весник на РМ“ бр.5/2002), Градоначалникот на Општина Делчево, на ден 20.12.2012 година, донесе РЕШЕНИЕ за објавување акти од 43.седница на Советот на Општина Делчево I Да се објават во „Службен гласник на Општина Делчево“ актите што Советот на Општина Делчево ги донесе на својата 43.редовна седница која се одржа на ден 19.12.2012 година и тоа: 1.Заклучок за усвојување на Квартален извештај за извршувањето на Буџетот на општина Делчево за периодот 01.01.2012 до 30.09.2012; 2.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација на лицето Богдан Георгиевски; 3.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација на лицето Борка Стојова; 4.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација на лицето Зоранчо Велковски; 5.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација на лицето Трајчо Митревски; 6.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација на лицето Орце Ангелов; 7.Одлука за вклопување на бесправно изграден објект во урбанистичко-планска документација
    [Show full text]
  • P R O C E E D I N G S
    GOCE DELCEV UNIVERSITY OF STIP FACULTY OF TOURISM AND BUSINESS LOGISTICS FACULTY OF TOURISM P R O C E E D I N G S THE 2 ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE CHALLENGES OF TOURISM AND BUSINESS LOGISTICS IN T H E 2 1 ST CENTURY S tip, September 13 th, 2 0 1 9 North Macedonia Publisher: Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics Goce Delcev University of Stip “Krste Misirkov” no.10-A P.O. Box 201 Stip 2000, North Macedonia Tel: +389 32 550 350 www.ftbl.ugd.edu.mk www.ugd.edu.mk For the Publisher: Nikola V. Dimitrov, Ph.D. – Dean Technical Support Cvetanka Ristova, M.Sc., University Teaching Assistant, Goce Delcev University of Stip, Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics, Stip, North Macedonia Conference organizer Goce Delcev University of Stip, Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics Co-organizers: - St. Clement of Ohrid University of Bitola, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Ohrid, North Macedonia - University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia - St. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Institute of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Skopje, North Macedonia - Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geography, regional development and tourism, Shumen, Bulgaria - University Haxhi Zeka, Faculty of Management in Tourism, Hotels and the Environment, Peć, Kosovo - Singidunum University, Faculty of Applied Ecology Futura, Belgrade, Serbia - Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека Св. „Климент Охридски“, Скопје 338.48(062) INTERNATIONAL scientific conference "Challenges of tourism and business logistics in the 21st century, ISCTBL (2 ; 2019 ; Stip) Proceedings / Second international scientific conference "Challenges of tourism and business logistics in 21st century, ISCTBL, Stip, September 13th, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • “Notes and Studies of Prespa in the Branislav Rusic Archoves at The
    “Notes and Studies of Prespa in the Branislav Rusiќ Archives at the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and the Arts” Branislav Rusiќ was a member of the first post-war generation of Macedonian ethnographers who set the groundwork for ethnographic studies of Macedonia. His family originated from the village of German in Lower Prespa, now in Aegean Macedonia. He was born in the village of Tomino in the Poreč region, he received his primary and secondary education in Prilep, Kruševac and in Bitola, and in 1937 received a degree in ethnography from Belgrade University. He received his doctorate from Zagreb University in 1951. From 1939 to 1946 he worked at the State Archives and at the Ethnographic museum in Belgrade. In 1946 he moved to the newly established university in Skopje, where he formed a group on Ethnology, which he lead until 1958. From 1958 to the end of his life in 1971 he was a professor of Ethnography in the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics. He was concurrently in charge of the division on folk costumes at the Folklore Institute in Skopje. Rusiќ’s greatest contribution to the ethnographic study of Macedonia is undoubtedly his extensive field research of every part of the country, either alone early in his career, or on field studies with his students in later years. He began his field research as a student in 1934 as a student at Belgrade University. There is hardly a village in Macedonia that escaped a study by Rusiќ, though his most voluminous studies were concentrated mostly in the regions of Poreč, Železnik, Debarce, Struga, Ohrid, Prespa, Slavište, Pijanec, Delčevo, Osogovia and Capari.
    [Show full text]
  • Misconceptions Regading Three Levels Of
    ПРИЛОЗИ, Одделение за природно-математички и биотехнички науки, МАНУ, том 40, бр. 1, стр. 93–103 (2019) CONTRIBUTIONS, Section of Natural, Mathematical and Biotechnical Sciences, MASA, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 93–103 (2019) Received: November 26, 2018 ISSN 1857–9027 Accepted: February 11, 2019 e-ISSN 1857–9949 UDC: 634.11-244.42(497.7)"2013/2017 634.53-244.42(497.7)"2013/2017 DOI: 10.20903/csnmbs.masa.2019.40.1.133 Original scientific paper PHYTOPHTHORA CACTORUM (LEBERT & COHN) J. SCHRÖT AS CAUSAL AGENT OF DIEBACK OF CHESTNUT AND APPLE TREES IN MACEDONIA# Mihajlo Risteski1*, Stephen Woodward2, Marin Ježić3, Rade Rusevski4, Biljana Kuzmanovska4, Kiril Sotirovski1 1Faculty of Forestry, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 2The Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland 3Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia 4Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia *e-mail: [email protected] From 2013–2017, 11 chestnut populations and 16 apple orchards/plantations in Macedonia were examined for health; soil, root and bark samples were collected from trees expressing symptoms regarded as Phytophthora specific. Using leaf baits of Prunus laurocerasus and selective V8 Agar (PARPNH), 19 pure Phytophthora sp. cultures were isolated and identified as P. cactorum by ITS sequencing. Sixteen isolates were from apple trees and 3 from chestnut trees. Phylogenetic analyses suggested slight distance between P. cactorum isolates originating from chestnut trees compared to those from apple orchards. Assessment of pathogenicity using chestnuts twigs showed no differences be- tween P. cactorum isolates from the two tree host species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Six: Complex Identities
    421 Chapter Six: Complex Identities THE MACEDONIAN EXPERIENCE of the late nineteenth century was not merely Christian and European. To this point we have assumed populations that were relatively homogenous in their ethnic, occupational and religious character. However, nineteenth century Macedonians were rather more diverse than these categories would suggest. A significant minority of the population (perhaps 10-15 per cent) were Turkish Muslims or Macedonian Muslims. The slow process of an evolving Macedonian identity was made the more complicated by these alternative realities. 6.1 Contrast between typical Macedonian Muslim village (Reka district) and typical Macedonian Christian village (Bitola region) Churches and mosques CHURCHES WERE FOUND throughout the Dolna Reka Christian villages. Some were hundreds of years old, such as the church in Gari built in the thirteenth century. Churches generally remained standing in mixed Macedonian Christian - Macedonian Muslim villages. However, in the case of Rostusha, the fifteenth century church Sveti Bogorojca was transformed into a mosque after the partial Islamicisation of the village. In exclusively Macedonian Muslim villages there were few churches standing in 1912. Usually they were left unattended and slowly deteriorated (this could take place over a period of hundreds of years) whilst the fate of others remains unknown. In religiously mixed villages, particularly when the Muslim element was dominant, a mosque was generally constructed in the village. It is not clear whether mosques were
    [Show full text]
  • Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: an Outline of the Ecclesiastical History (6Th-12Th Century)
    Robert MIHAJLOVSKI Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: An outline of the ecclesiastical history (6th-12th century) uDK 94:27(497.774)”5/l 1” La Trobe university, Melbourne [email protected] Abstract: Thisstudy presents my long-term field researCh on the Early Christian episCopal seat o f HeraClea LynCestis that was loCated along the anCient Roman Via Egnatia and in the valley o f Pelagonia. 1 disCuss various historiCal sourCes and topography of the region of medieval bishopric o f Pelagonia and Bitola. In addition, I also deal with the Christian Cultural heritage in the region. In this work these approaChes are within the Context o f archaeologiCal, historiCal and eCClesiastiCal investigation in the sites o f anCient HeaClea and modern Bitola. Key words: Heraclea Lyncestis, Pelagonia, Bitola, Prilep, Via Egnatia The Early Christian world on the Balkan Peninsula began to crumble already in the fourth century, with the invasions and migrations of the peoples and tribes. Vizigoths disrupted Balkan urban conditions in 378, the Huns of Atilla ravaged in 447 and Ostrogoths in 479. After the year 500 the disturbing catastrophes included an earthquake in 518, which seriously damaged the urban centers. Then came the Bubonic plague of 541-2, which was a terrible disaster of unprecedented magnitude, and other epidemics and catastrophes, which were recorded in 555, 558, 561, 573, 591 and 599.1 The invasions, epidemics and economic recession badly affected the population and society of the Eastern Roman Empire. Life in Herclea Lynkestis slowly declined. The Episcopal church was rebuilt in the early sixth century when the latest published coins of Justin II are found.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Touristic Itinerary in the Region of Prespa Abstract
    International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection Vol. 4, No. 7, 2016 ISSN 2309-0405 CREATING TOURISTIC ITINERARY IN THE REGION OF PRESPA M.Sc. Ema MUSLLI, PhD Candidate University of Tirana ABSTRACT The Prespa Region is located on the Balkan Peninsula, between the countries of Albania, Macedonia and Greece. It includes Greater Prespa Lake and the surrounding beach and meadow areas, designated agricultural use areas and the towns of Pustec, Resen and Prespes. This region is now a part of the Trans-Boundary Biosphere Reserve ‘Ohrid-Prespa Watershed. Greater and Lesser Prespa lakes plus Ohrid Lake are included in the UNESCO world Heritage Site. This area has been known historically for its diverse natural and cultural features. Prespa Region is currently covered by Prespa National Parks in Albania and Greece and Galichica and Pelisteri National Parks in Macedonia. The natural environment and the cultural heritage are a key element designated for the development of the region’s sustainable tourism. This study was enhanced via the Geographic Info System (GIS) digital presentation showing the opportunities for nature tourism in the Pustec and Resen commune. The article also includes two touristic itineraries that will help a better promotion of the tourism in the Prespa Region. Keywords: Touristic potential, cultural heritage, nature heritage, touristic itineraries. INTRODUCTION The Greater Prespa Watershed is located in the southeastern region of Albania and in the southwestern part of Macedonia, in the region of Korçë, commune of Pustec in the Albanian part, in the Resen commune in the Macedonian part and in the Prespe commune in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Op{Tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN
    Op{tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN DEKEMVRI, 2003 REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN NA OP[TINA PRILEP NARA^ATEL: MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE MINISTER : D-r.Zoran [apuri} KOORDINATOR NA PROEKTOT : VIOLETA DRAKULOVSKA IZVR[ITEL: JAVNO PRETPRIJATIE ZA PROSTORNI I URBANISTI^KI PLANOVI DIREKTOR: LIDIJA TRPENOSKA-SIMONOVI] RAKOVOITEL NA ZADA^ATA: CVETANKA MARKU[OSKA, dip.in`.arh. KORISNIK: OP[TINA PRILEP GRADONA^ALNIK: SA[O PIRGANOSKI KOORDINATOR NA LUK: KATICA DIMOVSKA TALESKA, DEKEMVRI 2003 LOKALEN UPRAVEN KOMITET: Koordinator: Katica Dimovska Taleska: Glaven arhitekt na grad Prilep ^lenovi: Lile Cvetanoska Dejan Koneski Stiv Vajs Roza Naumoska Gabriela Nikoloska Katerina Dimeska Gordana Dameska Laze Cvetkoski Rodna [arenkoska Hilda Crneska Vklu~eni nevladini organizacii vo sobirawe na informaciite, komunikacija so gra|anite, sproveduvawe na javnata anketa AGTIS , Mladinski Sovet i MKA od Prilep. Lokalen ekolo{ki akcionen plan na op{tina Prilep Sodr`ina Sodr`ina...........................................................................................................................................1 1. VOVED ...........................................................................................................................................3 2. POSTAPKA NA IZRABOTKA.............................................................................................6 3. OP[TI KARAKTERISTIKI NA OP[TINATA ........................................................9
    [Show full text]