Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916
COVID-19 STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PROGRAM (SPRP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916 “Installation of mobile COVID 19 Hospital within the hospital in the City of Prilep” October 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916 - Prilep “Installation of mobile COVID 19 hospital within the hospital in the City of Prilep” 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Project Description and planned activities ...................................................................................... 4 3. Environmental Category ................................................................................................................. 6 4. Potential Environmental Impacts .................................................................................................... 6 5. Purpose of the Checklist ESMP ...................................................................................................... 7 6. Application of the Checklist ESMP ................................................................................................ 8 7. Grievance Mechanism .....................................................................................................................9 8. Monitoring and reporting ............................................................................................................. -
On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps. -
Op{Tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN
Op{tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN DEKEMVRI, 2003 REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN NA OP[TINA PRILEP NARA^ATEL: MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE MINISTER : D-r.Zoran [apuri} KOORDINATOR NA PROEKTOT : VIOLETA DRAKULOVSKA IZVR[ITEL: JAVNO PRETPRIJATIE ZA PROSTORNI I URBANISTI^KI PLANOVI DIREKTOR: LIDIJA TRPENOSKA-SIMONOVI] RAKOVOITEL NA ZADA^ATA: CVETANKA MARKU[OSKA, dip.in`.arh. KORISNIK: OP[TINA PRILEP GRADONA^ALNIK: SA[O PIRGANOSKI KOORDINATOR NA LUK: KATICA DIMOVSKA TALESKA, DEKEMVRI 2003 LOKALEN UPRAVEN KOMITET: Koordinator: Katica Dimovska Taleska: Glaven arhitekt na grad Prilep ^lenovi: Lile Cvetanoska Dejan Koneski Stiv Vajs Roza Naumoska Gabriela Nikoloska Katerina Dimeska Gordana Dameska Laze Cvetkoski Rodna [arenkoska Hilda Crneska Vklu~eni nevladini organizacii vo sobirawe na informaciite, komunikacija so gra|anite, sproveduvawe na javnata anketa AGTIS , Mladinski Sovet i MKA od Prilep. Lokalen ekolo{ki akcionen plan na op{tina Prilep Sodr`ina Sodr`ina...........................................................................................................................................1 1. VOVED ...........................................................................................................................................3 2. POSTAPKA NA IZRABOTKA.............................................................................................6 3. OP[TI KARAKTERISTIKI NA OP[TINATA ........................................................9 -
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Floods
Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Floods DREF Operation Operation n° MDRMK004 Glide n° FL-2015-000012-MKD Date of issue: 12 February 2014 Date of disaster: 22 January 2015 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact (name and title): Ali Samet – DM Coordinator Sasho Taleski [email protected] / [email protected] Macedonian Red Cross [email protected] Operation start date: Expected timeframe: 4 months Overall operation budget: CHF 179,211 Number of people affected: 100,000 Number of people to be assisted: 3,740 people (935 families), including the people already assisted Host National Society: Red Cross Society of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Number of staff and volunteers involved in the emergency operation: 52 staff and 248 volunteers Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation (if available and relevant): N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: National Agencies for Crisis Management of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster In the last week of January, Macedonia was affected by storms with heavy rainfalls and snow in the higher areas. The storms caused serious damages in the eastern part of the country, especially in the Municipality of Karbinci where a few villages were immediately evacuated due to the rise of the water levels of the rivers as well as the artificial lake Kalimanci and Gradche where the dams reached their full capacity. Due to the efforts of the National Coordinative Body, the people were evacuated in the city of Shtip or Radovish, while the cattle were moved to lands on a higher altitude. -
Watershed, Macedonia
293 A summary of the environmental and socio-economic characteristics of the Crna Reka (Crna River) watershed, Macedonia Zoran Spirkovski Trajce Talevski Dusica Ilik-Boeva Goce Kostoski Odd Terje Sandlund NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is a new, electronic series beginning in 2005, which replaces the earlier series NINA commis- sioned reports and NINA project reports. This will be NINA’s usual form of reporting completed re- search, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the insti- tute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA report may also be issued in a second language where appropriate. NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) As the name suggests, special reports deal with special subjects. Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on impor- tant problem areas in society. NINA special reports are usually given a popular scientific form with more weight on illustrations than a NINA report. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. The are sent to the press, civil society organisations, nature management at all lev- els, politicians, and other special interests. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing In addition to reporting in NINA’s own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their scientific results in international journals, popular science books and magazines. -
Slu@Ben Glasnik Na Op[Tina Prilep
SLU@BEN GLASNIK NA OP[TINA PRILEP Slu`ben glasnik na 23 Septemvri 2009 godina @iro s-ka pri Op{tina Prilep – Slu`ben glasnik broj 13 Komercijalna banka – Izleguva po potreba Ovoj primerok ~ini 100 den. Filijala Prilep Godi{na pretplata 2.000 den. 300020000208779 EDB 4021996117695 Adresa: Pitu Guli br.2, tel.416-454 , www.prilep.gov.mk, email:[email protected] Vrz osnova na ~len 50 stav 1 to~ka 3 1.Cel na Programata; od Zakonot za lokalnata samouprava 2.Obem,dinamika i nivo na ("Slu`ben vesnik na RM" br.5/2002) i ~len 48 odr`uvaweto; stav 1 od Statutot na Op{tina Prilep 3.Organizaciska postavenost na ("Slu`ben glasnik na Op{tina Prilep" zimskata slu`ba i obvrski na u~esnicite: br.6/2003) Gradona~alnikot na Op{tina 3.1.Pretprijatie na koe }e mu bide Prilep, donese: doverena rabotata; Z A K L U ^ O K 3.2.Sovetot na op{tinata Prilep; ZA OBJAVUVAWE NA OPERATIVNATA 3.3.Nadzoren organ; PROGRAMA ZA ORGANIZIRAWE 3.4.Op{tinski centar za spravuvawe I FUNKCIONIRAWE NA ZIMSKATA so krizi; SLU@BA NA PODRA^JETO NA OP[TINA 3.5.Drugi u~esnici; PRILEP ZA SEZONATA 2009/2010 3.6.Organizacii,zaednici i gra|ani; 4.Prilozi: 1. Operativnata Programa za 4.1.Pregled na prioritetnoto organizirawe i funkcionirawe na zimskata ~istewe i posipuvawe na soobra}ajnicite vo slu`ba na podra~jeto na Op{tina Prilep za gradot; sezonata 2009/2010, se objavuva vo "Slu`ben 4.2.Spisok na odgovornite lica od glasnik na Op{tina Prilep". -
1391 Stability of the Yield in Commercial Tobacco Varieties in Republic of Macedonia
Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue: 2, 2014 TÜRK TURKISH TARIM ve DOĞA BİLİMLERİ JOURNAL of AGRICULTURAL DERGİSİ and NATURAL SCIENCES www.turkjans.com Stability of the yield in commercial tobacco varieties in Republic of Macedonia aAna KORUBIN - ALEKSOSKA*, aGordana MICESKA, aBiljana GVEROSKA, aMiroslav DIMITRIESKI, bJane ALEKSOSKI aDepartment of Genetics, Selection and seed control, Scientific Tobacco Institute – Prilep, University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Republic of Macedonia bBispromet – Bitola, Republic of Macedonia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Investigations were carried out with five commercial oriental aromatic tobacco varieties of the type Prilep: P – 23, PV 156/1, NS – 72, P – 66 – 9/7 and P – 79 – 94, to study green mass yield per stalk. The trial was set up in the Experimental field of Tobacco Institute – Prilep in 2010, 2011 and 2012, in randomized block design with four replications. Traditional agricultural practices were applied for realization of the experiment. The aim of investigations was through biometric analysis of the above quantitative trait to evaluate the variability of the commercial varieties, and thus give an assessment of their stability and guidance for their further expansion and maintenance. No significant differences were observed between the three years of investigation, which is an indication that green mass yield per stalk is highly heritable traits and varietal characteristic. Statistical parameters of variability are low, which is an indication of stable and homozygous genotypes, adapted to agro–ecological conditions of the region. Results on the standard deviation and variability coefficient were lower in 2012, because the seed sawn in this crop was obtained from one stalk for each variant isolated in 2010 and again from one stalk isolated in 2011. -
Lake Prilep – New Adventures, New Opportunities“
Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Prilep, 2019 1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. POLITICAL, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................. 4 2.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT............................. 7 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITIES ................................................................................ 11 4. BASIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 24 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ........................................................................................... 31 5.1 EMISSIONS -
The Sub-Project “Lake Prilep – New Adventures, New Opportunities“
Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Prilep, 2019 1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. POLITICAL, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................. 4 2.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT............................. 7 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITIES ................................................................................ 11 4. BASIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 24 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ........................................................................................... 31 5.1 EMISSIONS -
(Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020
IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 (first modification) Skopje, January 2019 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 10 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 10 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ..................................................................... 14 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme .............................................................. 14 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ............................................................................ 15 3.1 General socio-economic context .......................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ............................................ 15 3.1.2 Demographic situation .................................................................................................................. -
Contestations Over Macedonian Identity, 1870–1912
VICTORIA UNIVERSITY CONTESTATIONS OVER MACEDONIAN IDENTITY, 1870–1912 by NICK ANASTASOVSKI A THESIS SUBMITTED TO VICTORIA UNIVERSITY IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MELBOURNE, VICTORIA MAY, 2005 2 STUDENT DECLARATION I, Nick Anastasovski, declare that the thesis entitled Contestations over Macedonian Identity 1870–1912 is no more than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, figures, appendices and references. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work. Nick Anastasovski May 2005 3 DEDICATION To my wife Sophie whose support and encouragement made the study possible 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 9 Acknowledgments 11 Glossary of terms 13 List of maps 28 List of tables 32 List of illustrations 39 List of photographs 40 Introduction 42 Context 42 Summary 48 Chapter One: Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.1 Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.2 Religion and nationality 92 Chapter Two: Peoples and Populations 99 2.1 Peoples of Macedonia 99 Macedonians: The contested majority 99 Vlahs: Romanian or Greek, a contested minority 107 5 Greeks: Fishermen, farmers or townsfolk? 112 Turks and Albanians: The colonists 114 Gypsies and Jews: The uncontested 120 2.2 Conflicts around population data 124 Territorial boundaries 124 2.3 Population statistics 128 Ottoman Turkish population data 128 Population statistics advocated -
Annex 1: List of Rural Areas
Annex 1: List of rural areas Municipality Settlements designated as Rural areas (LAU 2) List of settlement on the level of the municipality with ≤ 30 000 inhabitants (Census 2002) Aerodrom Village: Dolno Lisiche. Arachinovo Villages: Arachinovo, Grushino, Mojanci and Orlanci. Berovo City: Berovo and villages: Budinarci, Vladimirovo, Dvorishte, Machevo, Mitrashinci, Ratevo, Rusinovo and Smojmirovo. Bitola Villages: Bareshani, Bistrica, Bratin Dol, Brusnik, Bukovo, Velushina, Gabalavci, Gopesh, Gorno Egri, Gorno Orizari, Graeshnica, Dihovo, Dolenci, Dolno Egri, Dolno Orizari, Dragarino, Dragozani, Dragosh, Drevenik, Gjavato, Zabeni, Zlokukjani, Kazani, Kanino, Karamani, Kishava, Kravari, Krklino, Kremenica, Krstoar, Kukurechani, Lavci, Lazec, Lera, Lisolaj, Logovardi, Lopatica, Magarevo, Malovishte, Metimir, Medzitlija, Nizepole, Novo Zmirnovo, Oblakovo, Oleveni, Optichari, Orehovo, Ostrec, Poeshevo, Porodin, Ramna, Rashtani, Rotino, Svinishte, Sekirani, Snegovo, Sredno Egri, Srpci, Staro Zmirnovo, Strezevo, Trn, Trnovo, Capari, Crnobuki and Crnovec. Bogdanci City: Bogdanci and villages: Gjavato, Selemli and Stojakovo. Bogovinje Villages: Bogovinje, Gorno Palchishte, Gorno Sedlarce, Dolno Palchishte, Jelovjane, Kamenjane, Zerovjane, Novake, Novo Selo, Pirok, Rakovec, Selce Kech, Sinichane and Urvich. Bosilovo Villages: Borievo, Bosilovo, Gecherlija, Drvosh, Ednokukevo, Ilovica, Monospitovo, Petralinci, Radovo, Robovo, Saraj, Sekirnik, Staro Baldovci, Turnovo, Hamzali and Shtuka. Brvenica Villages: Blace, Brvenica, Volkovija, Gurgurnica,