Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep Journal of Earth Science and Engineering 3 (2013) 569-581 D DAVID PUBLISHING Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep Cane Koteski, Dushko Josheski, Zlatko Jakovlev, Snezana Bardarova and Vladimir Kitanov Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delchev University of Shtip, Gevgelija 1480, Republic of Macedonia Received: June 15, 2013/Accepted: July 20, 2013/Published: August 25, 2013. Abstract: In this paper it has been investigated the issue of the dynamics of the rural population in villages in the mountainous areas of the municipality of Prilep height distribution of the mountainous villages, the area size, absolute density and agrarian population in hilly-mountainous villages, the distance of the hill-mountain villages of the municipality center and institutional infrastructure hilly-mountainous areas in Prilep. Despite the demographic decline that was made in the past 45 years, the municipality and the country will have even more incentive in the coming years to invest in infrastructure to improve little very bad living conditions and foremost here we think of infrastructure, roads, water drinking, clinics, veterinary stations, public transportation, gas stations, stores, construction of ethnic restaurants and small hotels so that at least the older generations of the cities as the least retirement to spend at home, to create minimum conditions for living and so that villages in hilly and mountainous villages to be attractive to younger generations of the cities and migrant workers from European countries and America Australia frequently to visit home, and to be able to invest in small commercial buildings in the area of tourism. Key words: Demographic structure, geographical location, agricultural density, institutional structure, Prilep. 1. Introduction 2. Geographical Location of Prilep In the paper it has been investigated more issues Prilep is located in the northern part of the such as: geographical position of Prilep within our Pelagonian valley with coordinates 41°14'26" North state, than movement, dynamics and structure of the geographic latitude and 21°28'54" East geographic national population in rural areas in mountainous longitude of the largest valley in the country. areas of Prilep, also the height distribution of the According to the size of the area Prilep is the largest 2 mountainous districts, and the size of the areas, and municipality in the country to 1,188 km . Its agricultural absolute density of population in the boundaries extend into central, southern and hilly-mountainous villages, also there is being southwestern part of the state. The municipality has an described the distance of hilly-mountainous villages average altitude [2]. The village territory is spread of the municipal center town of Prilep and finally it is from northern and northwestern parts of the upper described the institutional infrastructure of catchment area of Raechka River, south slope of hilly-mountainous villages in the municipality of Mount Babuna, as part of Prilep Pole, the South 1 Prilep [1]. At the end of a paper there are given entered the territory of Mariovo and the SW and W scientific conclusions, proposals and initiatives for occupies a large part of Prilep Field. Prilep has a way further development of the villages in the of stretching NW-SE. From S West and bordering hilly-mountainous areas of Prilep. municipalities Krivogashtani Dolneni Chaska, and the municipality of Kavadarci of SE with Sobotsko in Corresponding author: Dushko Josheski, master, main research field: economic geography. E-mail: 1 For explanation: S-W is South-West, NW-North West, [email protected]. SE-South-East, S-South. 570 Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep Greece and SW and W by municipalities and Novaci villages live in 2,873 or 11.8%, while in 2002 the mound. Prilep has a very favorable geographical number of population in plain areas was 5,599 or position and transport links. Through Prilep passes the 79.3%, lived in the hilly villages or 19.6% in 1384 and main road E-65. Prilep is 41 km away from Bitola, lived in mountain villages or 81 people 1:14% [4]. We Demir Hisar 62 km from KRU 32 km from M.Brod 37 feel free to conclude that the population in the period km, 49 km from Kavadarci and the capital Skopje 123 1961-2002 was decreased by 29.0%, according to the km [3]. categories of villages in the plain villages population in the period 1961 to 2002 decreased by 49.2% in the 3. Dynamics of Population in Villages in the hilly villages in the period from 1961 to 2002, the Municipality Prilep population decreased by 13.7% and in the mountain Prilep is comprised of 59 neighborhoods that are 58 villages of the population in the period 1961 to 2002 villages and the town of Prilep community center (Fig. 1). decreased by 2.8% [5]. As a conclusion the disastrous To see how the dynamics of population took place in decline of the population in all three categories in the villages in the municipality of Prilep in the period villages in the period 1961-2002 had a profound 1961-2002 year will use the data from Table 1. impact poor roads, water supply, sewerage, electricity According to the Table 1, it presents in 1961 the and postal infrastructure, lack of health and veterinary total population of 24,320 inhabitants in the villages in clinics, stores, then mass migration from villages to the municipality of Prilep plain lived 11,376 or 46.7%, cities and mass occurrence of going abroad for work live in hilly areas 10,071 or 41.4% in mountain during the 1960-1980 year [6]. Fig. 1 Limits and rural area of the municipality of Prilep. Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep 571 Table 1 Dynamics of population in rural areas of the municipality of Prilep in the period 1961-2002 year. Item Altitude Lowland Hilly Mountain Census periods 1961-2002 years Settlement number (m) settlements areas areas 1961 1971 1981 1994 2002 1 Alinci 670 + 449 486 449 281 238 2 Belovodica 800 + 356 182 73 18 24 3 Berovci 628 + 352 375 357 353 334 4 Bešište 900 + 1,171 1,016 238 93 22 5 Bonce 620 + 580 475 243 86 45 6 Veprčani 800 + 367 319 275 18 10 7 Veselčani 613 + 361 319 275 121 98 8 Vitoliste 830 + 1,291 1,110 664 290 170 9 Volkovo 780 + 148 79 79 41 42 10 Vrpsko 800 + 137 46 3 2 0 11 Galičani 617 + 341 359 335 249 251 12 G. Radobil 620 + 429 304 197 108 107 13 G. Konjari 607 + 926 922 905 685 699 14 Gudjakovo 580 + 132 41 4 0 0 15 Dabnica 605 + 117 41 17 13 66 16 Dren 570 + 46 19 16 7 10 17 Dunje 690 + 778 731 333 145 77 18 Erekovci 600 + 789 643 684 455 385 19 Ž ivovo 920 + 250 79 7 5 0 20 Zagorani 612 + 546 455 396 190 108 21 Kadino S. 612 + 564 521 419 314 269 22 Kalen 640 + 336 287 110 38 19 23 Kanatlatci 620 + 1,523 1031 1039 990 972 24 Klepac 590 + 432 389 366 156 160 25. Kokre 720 + 266 206 53 16 7 26. Kruševica 759 + 637 595 283 117 87 27 Krstec 1080 + 93 21 9 8 1 28 Leništa 780 + 413 265 40 2 0 29 Lopatica 576 + 611 417 194 331 41 30 Mazučište 660 + 610 474 465 362 346 31. M.Radobil 620 + 115 63 31 23 10 32 M.Konjari 613 + 786 804 834 713 727 33 M. Ruvci 740 + 229 250 68 27 22 34 Manastir 690 + 232 139 19 12 4 35 Marul 780 + 365 280 130 39 25 36 Nikodin 600 + 437 212 66 10 7 37 N. lagovo 640 + 251 238 212 189 213 38 Oreovec 860 + 308 172 44 16 17 39 Peštani 670 + 210 149 63 18 20 40 Pletvar 990 + 331 177 87 30 22 41 Podmol 600 + 552 448 338 185 138 42 Polčište 910 + 824 479 192 45 31 43 Prilepec 830 + 154 119 53 16 9 44 Prisad 940 + 204 95 48 9 5 45 Rakle 700 + 269 145 24 7 7 46 Selce 740 + 322 295 292 310 294 47 Smolani 650 + 20 2 0 0 0 572 Demographic and Infrastructure Problems of Villages in the Hilly-Mountainous Areas of Prilep (Table 1 continued) Item Altitude Lowland Hilly Mountain Census periods 1961-2002 years Settlement number (m) settlements areas areas 1961 1971 1981 1994 2002 48 St. lagovo 685 + 161 93 74 49 38 49 Toplica 680 + 144 73 15 6 5 50 Topolcani 600 + 929 857 748 505 449 51 Trojaci 600 + 224 119 34 29 11 52 Trojkrsti 600 + 268 258 204 97 81 53 Carevic 696 + 166 77 32 12 10 54 Čanište 720 + 694 552 348 83 47 55 Čepigovo 600 + 216 197 218 167 162 56 Čumovo 860 + 227 171 94 33 17 57 Šeleverci 635 + 137 137 81 33 21 58 Štavica 800 + 494 413 264 107 84 Total 24 28 6 24,320 19,221 13,141 8,264 7,064 Population in plain villages Total number of villages 24 11,376 9,614 8,517 6,301 5,599 Population in hilly villages Total number of villages 28 10,071 7,740 4,043 1,773 1,384 Population in mountain Total number of villages 6 28,73 1,867 581 190 81 villages Data source: Comparable data for population 1971 and 1981 Statistical Review 139, 1984 year, Skopje.
Recommended publications
  • ENVIRONMENTAL and SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916
    COVID-19 STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PROGRAM (SPRP) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916 “Installation of mobile COVID 19 Hospital within the hospital in the City of Prilep” October 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) CHECKLIST North Macedonia Emergency COVID-19 Response Project P173916 - Prilep “Installation of mobile COVID 19 hospital within the hospital in the City of Prilep” 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Project Description and planned activities ...................................................................................... 4 3. Environmental Category ................................................................................................................. 6 4. Potential Environmental Impacts .................................................................................................... 6 5. Purpose of the Checklist ESMP ...................................................................................................... 7 6. Application of the Checklist ESMP ................................................................................................ 8 7. Grievance Mechanism .....................................................................................................................9 8. Monitoring and reporting .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Op{Tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN
    Op{tina PRILEP LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN DEKEMVRI, 2003 REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE LOKALEN EKOLO[KI AKCIONEN PLAN NA OP[TINA PRILEP NARA^ATEL: MINISTERSTVO ZA @IVOTNA SREDINA I PROSTORNO PLANIRAWE MINISTER : D-r.Zoran [apuri} KOORDINATOR NA PROEKTOT : VIOLETA DRAKULOVSKA IZVR[ITEL: JAVNO PRETPRIJATIE ZA PROSTORNI I URBANISTI^KI PLANOVI DIREKTOR: LIDIJA TRPENOSKA-SIMONOVI] RAKOVOITEL NA ZADA^ATA: CVETANKA MARKU[OSKA, dip.in`.arh. KORISNIK: OP[TINA PRILEP GRADONA^ALNIK: SA[O PIRGANOSKI KOORDINATOR NA LUK: KATICA DIMOVSKA TALESKA, DEKEMVRI 2003 LOKALEN UPRAVEN KOMITET: Koordinator: Katica Dimovska Taleska: Glaven arhitekt na grad Prilep ^lenovi: Lile Cvetanoska Dejan Koneski Stiv Vajs Roza Naumoska Gabriela Nikoloska Katerina Dimeska Gordana Dameska Laze Cvetkoski Rodna [arenkoska Hilda Crneska Vklu~eni nevladini organizacii vo sobirawe na informaciite, komunikacija so gra|anite, sproveduvawe na javnata anketa AGTIS , Mladinski Sovet i MKA od Prilep. Lokalen ekolo{ki akcionen plan na op{tina Prilep Sodr`ina Sodr`ina...........................................................................................................................................1 1. VOVED ...........................................................................................................................................3 2. POSTAPKA NA IZRABOTKA.............................................................................................6 3. OP[TI KARAKTERISTIKI NA OP[TINATA ........................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Floods
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Floods DREF Operation Operation n° MDRMK004 Glide n° FL-2015-000012-MKD Date of issue: 12 February 2014 Date of disaster: 22 January 2015 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact (name and title): Ali Samet – DM Coordinator Sasho Taleski [email protected] / [email protected] Macedonian Red Cross [email protected] Operation start date: Expected timeframe: 4 months Overall operation budget: CHF 179,211 Number of people affected: 100,000 Number of people to be assisted: 3,740 people (935 families), including the people already assisted Host National Society: Red Cross Society of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Number of staff and volunteers involved in the emergency operation: 52 staff and 248 volunteers Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation (if available and relevant): N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: National Agencies for Crisis Management of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster In the last week of January, Macedonia was affected by storms with heavy rainfalls and snow in the higher areas. The storms caused serious damages in the eastern part of the country, especially in the Municipality of Karbinci where a few villages were immediately evacuated due to the rise of the water levels of the rivers as well as the artificial lake Kalimanci and Gradche where the dams reached their full capacity. Due to the efforts of the National Coordinative Body, the people were evacuated in the city of Shtip or Radovish, while the cattle were moved to lands on a higher altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed, Macedonia
    293 A summary of the environmental and socio-economic characteristics of the Crna Reka (Crna River) watershed, Macedonia Zoran Spirkovski Trajce Talevski Dusica Ilik-Boeva Goce Kostoski Odd Terje Sandlund NINA Publications NINA Report (NINA Rapport) This is a new, electronic series beginning in 2005, which replaces the earlier series NINA commis- sioned reports and NINA project reports. This will be NINA’s usual form of reporting completed re- search, monitoring or review work to clients. In addition, the series will include much of the insti- tute’s other reporting, for example from seminars and conferences, results of internal research and review work and literature studies, etc. NINA report may also be issued in a second language where appropriate. NINA Special Report (NINA Temahefte) As the name suggests, special reports deal with special subjects. Special reports are produced as required and the series ranges widely: from systematic identification keys to information on impor- tant problem areas in society. NINA special reports are usually given a popular scientific form with more weight on illustrations than a NINA report. NINA Factsheet (NINA Fakta) Factsheets have as their goal to make NINA’s research results quickly and easily accessible to the general public. The are sent to the press, civil society organisations, nature management at all lev- els, politicians, and other special interests. Fact sheets give a short presentation of some of our most important research themes. Other publishing In addition to reporting in NINA’s own series, the institute’s employees publish a large proportion of their scientific results in international journals, popular science books and magazines.
    [Show full text]
  • Slu@Ben Glasnik Na Op[Tina Prilep
    SLU@BEN GLASNIK NA OP[TINA PRILEP Slu`ben glasnik na 23 Septemvri 2009 godina @iro s-ka pri Op{tina Prilep – Slu`ben glasnik broj 13 Komercijalna banka – Izleguva po potreba Ovoj primerok ~ini 100 den. Filijala Prilep Godi{na pretplata 2.000 den. 300020000208779 EDB 4021996117695 Adresa: Pitu Guli br.2, tel.416-454 , www.prilep.gov.mk, email:[email protected] Vrz osnova na ~len 50 stav 1 to~ka 3 1.Cel na Programata; od Zakonot za lokalnata samouprava 2.Obem,dinamika i nivo na ("Slu`ben vesnik na RM" br.5/2002) i ~len 48 odr`uvaweto; stav 1 od Statutot na Op{tina Prilep 3.Organizaciska postavenost na ("Slu`ben glasnik na Op{tina Prilep" zimskata slu`ba i obvrski na u~esnicite: br.6/2003) Gradona~alnikot na Op{tina 3.1.Pretprijatie na koe }e mu bide Prilep, donese: doverena rabotata; Z A K L U ^ O K 3.2.Sovetot na op{tinata Prilep; ZA OBJAVUVAWE NA OPERATIVNATA 3.3.Nadzoren organ; PROGRAMA ZA ORGANIZIRAWE 3.4.Op{tinski centar za spravuvawe I FUNKCIONIRAWE NA ZIMSKATA so krizi; SLU@BA NA PODRA^JETO NA OP[TINA 3.5.Drugi u~esnici; PRILEP ZA SEZONATA 2009/2010 3.6.Organizacii,zaednici i gra|ani; 4.Prilozi: 1. Operativnata Programa za 4.1.Pregled na prioritetnoto organizirawe i funkcionirawe na zimskata ~istewe i posipuvawe na soobra}ajnicite vo slu`ba na podra~jeto na Op{tina Prilep za gradot; sezonata 2009/2010, se objavuva vo "Slu`ben 4.2.Spisok na odgovornite lica od glasnik na Op{tina Prilep".
    [Show full text]
  • 1391 Stability of the Yield in Commercial Tobacco Varieties in Republic of Macedonia
    Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue: 2, 2014 TÜRK TURKISH TARIM ve DOĞA BİLİMLERİ JOURNAL of AGRICULTURAL DERGİSİ and NATURAL SCIENCES www.turkjans.com Stability of the yield in commercial tobacco varieties in Republic of Macedonia aAna KORUBIN - ALEKSOSKA*, aGordana MICESKA, aBiljana GVEROSKA, aMiroslav DIMITRIESKI, bJane ALEKSOSKI aDepartment of Genetics, Selection and seed control, Scientific Tobacco Institute – Prilep, University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – Bitola, Republic of Macedonia bBispromet – Bitola, Republic of Macedonia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Investigations were carried out with five commercial oriental aromatic tobacco varieties of the type Prilep: P – 23, PV 156/1, NS – 72, P – 66 – 9/7 and P – 79 – 94, to study green mass yield per stalk. The trial was set up in the Experimental field of Tobacco Institute – Prilep in 2010, 2011 and 2012, in randomized block design with four replications. Traditional agricultural practices were applied for realization of the experiment. The aim of investigations was through biometric analysis of the above quantitative trait to evaluate the variability of the commercial varieties, and thus give an assessment of their stability and guidance for their further expansion and maintenance. No significant differences were observed between the three years of investigation, which is an indication that green mass yield per stalk is highly heritable traits and varietal characteristic. Statistical parameters of variability are low, which is an indication of stable and homozygous genotypes, adapted to agro–ecological conditions of the region. Results on the standard deviation and variability coefficient were lower in 2012, because the seed sawn in this crop was obtained from one stalk for each variant isolated in 2010 and again from one stalk isolated in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Prilep – New Adventures, New Opportunities“
    Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Prilep, 2019 1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. POLITICAL, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................. 4 2.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT............................. 7 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITIES ................................................................................ 11 4. BASIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 24 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ........................................................................................... 31 5.1 EMISSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • The Sub-Project “Lake Prilep – New Adventures, New Opportunities“
    Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Prilep, 2019 1 Environmental and Social Management Plan for the sub-project “Lake Prilep – New adventures, new opportunities“ Content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 2. POLITICAL, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ................................................. 4 2.1 PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS OVER THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT............................. 7 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTIVITIES ................................................................................ 11 4. BASIC INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 24 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ........................................................................................... 31 5.1 EMISSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • (Ipa) Rural Development Programme 2014-2020
    IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA EU INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION (IPA) RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 (first modification) Skopje, January 2019 IPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2014-2020 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 10 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... 10 1. TITLE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ..................................................................... 14 2. COUNTRY PROFILE ............................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Geographical area covered by the Programme .............................................................. 14 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ............................................................................ 15 3.1 General socio-economic context .......................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Definition of areas related to Programme implementation ............................................ 15 3.1.2 Demographic situation ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contestations Over Macedonian Identity, 1870–1912
    VICTORIA UNIVERSITY CONTESTATIONS OVER MACEDONIAN IDENTITY, 1870–1912 by NICK ANASTASOVSKI A THESIS SUBMITTED TO VICTORIA UNIVERSITY IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES MELBOURNE, VICTORIA MAY, 2005 2 STUDENT DECLARATION I, Nick Anastasovski, declare that the thesis entitled Contestations over Macedonian Identity 1870–1912 is no more than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, figures, appendices and references. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work. Nick Anastasovski May 2005 3 DEDICATION To my wife Sophie whose support and encouragement made the study possible 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 9 Acknowledgments 11 Glossary of terms 13 List of maps 28 List of tables 32 List of illustrations 39 List of photographs 40 Introduction 42 Context 42 Summary 48 Chapter One: Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.1 Colonisation and Islamicisation 55 1.2 Religion and nationality 92 Chapter Two: Peoples and Populations 99 2.1 Peoples of Macedonia 99 Macedonians: The contested majority 99 Vlahs: Romanian or Greek, a contested minority 107 5 Greeks: Fishermen, farmers or townsfolk? 112 Turks and Albanians: The colonists 114 Gypsies and Jews: The uncontested 120 2.2 Conflicts around population data 124 Territorial boundaries 124 2.3 Population statistics 128 Ottoman Turkish population data 128 Population statistics advocated
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: List of Rural Areas
    Annex 1: List of rural areas Municipality Settlements designated as Rural areas (LAU 2) List of settlement on the level of the municipality with ≤ 30 000 inhabitants (Census 2002) Aerodrom Village: Dolno Lisiche. Arachinovo Villages: Arachinovo, Grushino, Mojanci and Orlanci. Berovo City: Berovo and villages: Budinarci, Vladimirovo, Dvorishte, Machevo, Mitrashinci, Ratevo, Rusinovo and Smojmirovo. Bitola Villages: Bareshani, Bistrica, Bratin Dol, Brusnik, Bukovo, Velushina, Gabalavci, Gopesh, Gorno Egri, Gorno Orizari, Graeshnica, Dihovo, Dolenci, Dolno Egri, Dolno Orizari, Dragarino, Dragozani, Dragosh, Drevenik, Gjavato, Zabeni, Zlokukjani, Kazani, Kanino, Karamani, Kishava, Kravari, Krklino, Kremenica, Krstoar, Kukurechani, Lavci, Lazec, Lera, Lisolaj, Logovardi, Lopatica, Magarevo, Malovishte, Metimir, Medzitlija, Nizepole, Novo Zmirnovo, Oblakovo, Oleveni, Optichari, Orehovo, Ostrec, Poeshevo, Porodin, Ramna, Rashtani, Rotino, Svinishte, Sekirani, Snegovo, Sredno Egri, Srpci, Staro Zmirnovo, Strezevo, Trn, Trnovo, Capari, Crnobuki and Crnovec. Bogdanci City: Bogdanci and villages: Gjavato, Selemli and Stojakovo. Bogovinje Villages: Bogovinje, Gorno Palchishte, Gorno Sedlarce, Dolno Palchishte, Jelovjane, Kamenjane, Zerovjane, Novake, Novo Selo, Pirok, Rakovec, Selce Kech, Sinichane and Urvich. Bosilovo Villages: Borievo, Bosilovo, Gecherlija, Drvosh, Ednokukevo, Ilovica, Monospitovo, Petralinci, Radovo, Robovo, Saraj, Sekirnik, Staro Baldovci, Turnovo, Hamzali and Shtuka. Brvenica Villages: Blace, Brvenica, Volkovija, Gurgurnica,
    [Show full text]