Wood-Processing Sector Survey Content

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wood-Processing Sector Survey Content November 1st, 2010 WOOD-PROCESSING SECTOR SURVEY Report Authored by AM Partners Consulting Company AM Partners Consulting Company Wood-Processing Sector Survey Content Content ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE WOOD-PROCESSING SECTOR SURVEY .................................................................. 2 1.2 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Identification of logging and wood processing practices ........................................................ 2 1.2.2 Analysis of wood-pocessing industry .................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Case study .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.4 Possibility for establishment of Association .......................................................................... 4 2 CONDITION AND USE OF THE FOREST RESOURCES ............................................................ 5 2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 FOREST LAND AND COVER TYPES .................................................................................................... 5 2.3 FOREST CONDITION ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 FOREST INSTITUTIONS ................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.......................................................................................... 9 2.6 USE OF FOREST RESOURCES ....................................................................................................... 11 2.6.1 Commercial use ................................................................................................................. 11 2.6.2 Wood for fuel ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.6.3 Subsistence and non-commercial use ................................................................................ 11 2.6.4 Illegal exploitation of forest resources ................................................................................ 12 3 WOOD PROCESSING .................................................................................................... 13 3.1 CURRENT STATE ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 WOOD PROCESSING COMPANIES .................................................................................................. 13 3.2.1 Existing equipment, facilities and processing practices ........................................................ 17 3.2.2 Input Supply ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.3 Marketing and sales ............................................................................................................ 20 3.2.4 Exports ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.3 INDUSTRY SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 22 3.4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 25 4 CASE STUDY............................................................................................................... 26 4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 26 4.2 KENYAN CARVING SECTOR .......................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2 Challenge .......................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Project description ............................................................................................................. 29 4.2.4 Findings ............................................................................................................................. 30 4.2.5 Intervention ........................................................................................................................ 30 4.2.6 Outcome ............................................................................................................................ 31 4.2.7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 31 5 ASSOCIATION .............................................................................................................. 32 5.1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................. 32 5.2 POSSIBILITY OF ASSOCIATION ESTABLISHMENT IN ARMENIA ............................................................. 33 5.3 GOAL AND MAIN OBJECTIVES OF WOOD PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION .............................................. 34 5.4 BENEFITS OF ASSOCIATION .......................................................................................................... 34 6 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................... 37 6.1 MINIMAL PRICES FOR GIVING OUT WOOD FROM RA FOREST FUND .................................................. 37 1 Wood-Processing Sector Survey Content 6.2 NATURE USE FEE TARIFFS ........................................................................................................... 38 6.3 USEFUL WEBSITES ...................................................................................................................... 39 6.4 QUESTIONNAIRES ........................................................................................................................ 42 6.4.1 Interview Guide “ArmForest” branches No_______ _______._______.2010 ......... 42 6.4.2 Interview guide Private business entities No_______ _______._______.2010 ...... 46 2 Wood-Processing Sector Survey Introduction ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AMD Armenian Dram CBMF Community Based Forest Management CJSC Closed Joint Stock Company EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FLEG Forest Law Enforcement and Governance FREC Forest Research and Experimental Centre FSC Forest Stewardship Council GIS Geographic information system IUCN Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources KFS Kenya Forest Service Ksh Kenyan Shilling KWS Kenya Wildlife Service LLC Limited Liability Company MDG Millennium Development Goal MoNP Ministry of Natural Protection of Armenia NFPS National Forest Policy and Strategy NGO Non-governmental organization NRMPRP Natural Resources Management and Poverty Reduction Project NSS National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia NTFP Non-timber forest products NWFP Non Wood Forest Products OJSC Opened Joint Stock Company R-PIN Forest Carbon Partnership SIDA Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency SLIMF Small or Low Intensity Managed Forests SME Small and medium enterprise SME-DNC Small and Medium Entrepreneurship Development National Center of Armenia SMFE Small and medium forest enterprise SNCO State Non-Commercial Organization SPD Sustainable Product Development UK United Kingdom UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNDP-GEF United Nations Development Program Small Grants Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization USD United States Dollar USDA United States Department of Agriculture WB World Bank WRN World Rain forest Movement WWF World Wide Fund for Nature 1 Wood-Processing Sector Survey Introduction 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE WOOD-PROCESSING SECTOR SURVEY The regional program Improving Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in the European Neighbourhood Policy East Countries and Russia – ENPI FLEG Program is aimed at putting in place improved forest governance arrangements through the effective implementation of the main priorities set out in the St. Petersburg Ministerial Declaration and Indicative Plan of Actions for the Europe and North Asia Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (ENA-FLEG) process. The ENPI FLEG program supports governments, civil society, and the private sector in participating countries in the development of sound and sustainable forest management practices, including the reducing the incidence of illegal forestry activities. Implementation of the program is led by the World Bank, working in partnership with the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and in close coordination with governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders of the participating countries. Hereby, the WWF Armenia initiated the activity
Recommended publications
  • Request for Quotation Rfq 046/17
    REQUEST FOR QUOTATION RFQ 046/17 DATE: 17 July, 2017 NAME & ADDRESS OF FIRM REFERENCE: Supply of fruit tree seedlings for orchards in Ditavan and Baghanis villages Dear Bidder: We kindly request you to submit your quotation for “Supply of fruit tree seedlings for orchards in Ditavan and Baghanis villages” detailed in Annex 1 of this RFQ. Quotations may be submitted on or before 18:00 (local time), August 8, 2017 and via ☒ e- mail, or☒ courier mail to the address below: [email protected] or United Nations Development Programme 14 Petros Adamyan street, 0010, Yerevan Quotations submitted by email must be limited to a maximum of 5MB, virus-free and no more than 3 transmissions. They must be free from any form of virus or corrupted contents, or the quotations shall be rejected. It shall remain your responsibility to ensure that your quotation will reach the address above on or before the deadline. Quotations that are received by UNDP after the deadline indicated above, for whatever reason, shall not be considered for evaluation. If you are submitting your quotation by email, kindly ensure that they are signed and in the .pdf format, and free from any virus or corrupted files. Please take note of the following requirements and conditions pertaining to the supply of the above mentioned good/s: 1 Delivery Terms ☒ DAP Ditavan and Baghanis villages, Tavush region, Armenia [INCOTERMS 2010] Customs clearance1, if ☒ by UNDP needed, shall be done by: Exact Address of Delivery Ditavan and Baghanis villages, Tavush region, Armenia Location: Latest Expected Delivery ☒ 45 days from the issuance of the Purchase Order (PO) Delivery Schedule ☒Required Mode of Transport ☒LAND (preferred) ☒AIR Preferred ☒United States Dollars(preferred) or 2 Currency of Quotation ☒Local Currency: Armenian drams Value Added Tax on Price ☒Must be exclusive of VAT and other applicable indirect taxes 3 Quotation After-sales services required ☒ N/A.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Level Risk Management M a N U
    LOCAL LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT M A N U A L Y E R E V A N 2012 1 LLRM EXECUTIVE LOCAL LEVEL RISK IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND 2 3 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT (LLRM) / FORMAT EXPERIENCE IN ARMENIA VULNERABILITY AND GENERAL APPROACHES AND CAPACITY 1.1 INFORMATION 2.1 3.1 PRINCIPLES APPLIED ASSESSMENT (VCA) HAZARDS RESOURCES AND THREATENING 3.2 PRACTICAL CASES TOOLS ARMENIA PROCESS A PREPARATORY PHASE DATA COLLECTION B AND RESEARCH C ANALYSIS D TOOL KIT PLANNING DRR MAINSTREAMING INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANS / DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION DRR AND CLIMATE LLRM RISK MANAGEMENT DRR AND GENDER M A N U A L EQUITY 2 Authors: Ashot Sargsyan UNDP, DRR Adviser Armen Chilingaryan UNDP, DRR Project Coordinator Susanna Mnatsakanyan UNDP DRR Project VCA Expert Experts: Hamlet Matevosyan Rector of the Crisis Management State Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hasmik Saroyan Climate Risk Management Expert LLRM/VCA implementation Armen Arakelyan Specialist Head of “Lore” Rescue Team This manual is prepared and published with financial support from UNDP within the framework of the Project Strengthening of National Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction Capacities in Armenia. Empowered lives The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Resilient nations United Nations or UNDP. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a result of consolidation of collective efforts of many professionals and experts from different organizations and agencies – members of the UN extended Disaster Management Team, which worked during the years hand-to-hand to support and facilitate the strengthening of Disaster Management national system in Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ad Hoc Public Report on Ensuring the Right of Access to Water And
    AD HOC PUBLIC REPORT ON ENSURING THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO WATER AND SANITATION IN PRESCHOOLS AND SCHOOLS YEREVAN 2019 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 8 WATER AND SANITATION ACCESS AS A HUMAN RIGHT ................................................................. 8 1.1 CONTENT AND PRINCIPLES OF RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO .............................................................. 9 WATER AND SANITATION ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2. CRITERIA FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT OF WATER AND SANITATION ............ 12 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................ 17 ENSURING WATER AND SANITATION RIGHT ................................................................................... 17 IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ........................................................................................................ 17 2.1 FIXATION OF RIGHT OF WATER AND SANITATION IN THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final Project Design Report Main Report
    Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final Project Design Report Main report and annexes Document Date: May 2014 Project No. 1690 Report No: ____-AM Near East, North Africa and Europe Division Programme Management Department Republic of Armenia Infrastructure and Rural Finance Support Programme Final project design report Main report Contents Page Currency equivalents iii Abbreviations and acronyms iii Map of IFAD Operations in the Country v Map of the Programme area vi Executive Summary vii Logical Framework xiii I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE 1 A. Background 1 B. Country and Rural Development Context 2 C. Rationale 6 II. PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION 9 A. Development Objectives 9 B. Programme Components 9 C. Target Group and Programme Area 10 D. Description of Inputs and Outputs/Outcomes 12 III. PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION 17 A. Approaches 17 B. Implementation Schedule for Civil Works 20 C. Planning, M&E, Learning and Knowledge Management 23 D. Financial Management 24 E. Procurement and Governance 26 F. Supervision 28 G. Risk Identification and Mitigation 29 IV. PROGRAMME COSTS, FINANCING, BENEFITS AND SUSTAINABILITY 32 A. Estimated Programme Costs 32 B. Proposed Programme Financing 33 C. Summary Benefits and Economic Analysis 34 D. Sustainability 38 TABLES Table 1: Armenia: Reduction in the Incidence of Poverty 1998/99 to 2007 4 Table 2: Programme Costs by Component 32 Table 3: Proposed Programme Financing Sources by Type of Investment 33 Table 4: Proposed Programme Financing Sources by Component 33 Table
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • Arménie COUNTRY GUIDE Numérique OFFERT Ce Guide Au Format Guide Au Format Ce Arménie
    2018 2019 arménie COUNTRY GUIDE numérique OFFERT ce guide au format guide au format ce arménie www.petitfute.com Parce que vous êtes unique ... ... vous rêviez d’un guide sur mesure © SEAN PAVONE - ISTOCKPHOTO.COM © SEAN PAVONE a vous de jouer ! mon guide sur mesure www.mypetitfute.com ÉDITION Directeurs de collection et auteurs : Dominique AUZIAS et Jean-Paul LABOURDETTE Auteurs : Gari ULUBEYAN, Bienvenue Jean-Paul LABOURDETTE, Dominique AUZIAS et alter Directeur Editorial : Stephan SZEREMETA en Arménie ! Rédaction Monde : Caroline MICHELOT, Morgane VESLIN, Pierre-Yves SOUCHET, Jimmy POSTOLLEC et Elvane SAHIN Il y a 20 ans, paraissait la première édition de ce guide sur Rédaction France : Elisabeth COL, Silvia FOLIGNO, Tony DE SOUSA et Agnès VIZY l’Arménie. Pionnier, souvent, sur des terres en friche, le FABRICATION Petit Futé me confiait la mission de dévoiler les charmes Responsable Studio : Sophie LECHERTIER de cette ex-République d’URSS, jusque-là ignorée par assistée de Romain AUDREN les voyagistes et la littérature spécialisée. Emancipé Maquette et Montage : Julie BORDES, Sandrine MECKING, Delphine PAGANO du passé soviétique, ce petit pays blotti au sud du et Laurie PILLOIS Caucase attire toujours plus de visiteurs, séduits par Iconographie : Anne DIOT ses montagnes et son patrimoine. Engagée sur la voie Cartographie : Jordan EL OUARDI de la mondialisation – et de la Francophonie, dont elle WEB ET NUMÉRIQUE e Directeur Web : Louis GENEAU DE LAMARLIERE accueille le 17 sommet en octobre 2018 –, l’Arménie Chef de projet et développeurs : défend farouchement son indépendance, dont elle célébra Cédric MAILLOUX, Nicolas DE GUENIN, avec faste le 25e anniversaire en septembre 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia
    Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia DISCLAIMER This report has been developed within the framework of The European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) funded by the European Union, implemented by the OECD in partnership with UNECE. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. FOREWORD The project was implemented as part of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on water policy in Armenia conducted in co-operation with the European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia and facilitated by the OECD and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The OECD commissioned Trémolet Consulting Limited (UK) jointly with JINJ Ltd. (Armenia), which included Sophie Trémolet, Lilit Melikyan, Kevin Tayler, Eduard Mesropyan and Aida Iskoyan, for the analytical work and whom are also the authors of this report. Tatiana Efimova at the OECD provided essential oversight and inputs. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of participants of the EUWI National Policy Dialogue to the project and to this report, and would like to thank the State Committee of Water Systems of Armenia for a very productive co-operation. The authors thank Xavier Leflaive (OECD) for his valuable comments that helped improve both the content and structure of the report, and express their appreciation to Matthew Griffiths (OECD) for professional contributions to the project at its final stage. In addition, the authors thank Shukhrat Ziyaviddinov, Maria Dubois and Lupita Johanson (all OECD), for their valuable contribution to preparing publication of the report. The views presented in this report are those of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Government of Armenia, the European Union, or the OECD and its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • FLEG II Roadshows in Forest Dependent Communities of Armenia
    FLEG II Roadshows in Forest Dependent Communities of Armenia Armenian Forests NGO Yerevan 2015 1 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi -fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the E uropean Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 5 3. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 6 4. FLEG Roadshows Implementation .................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Preparatory Work ........................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Road Show Inplementation ........................................................................................................................ 9 5. Results of the Project .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and Deportation of Azerbaijanis
    GENOCIDE AND DEPORTATION OF AZERBAIJANIS C O N T E N T S General information........................................................................................................................... 3 Resettlement of Armenians to Azerbaijani lands and its grave consequences ................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Iran ........................................................................................ 5 Resettlement of Armenians from Turkey ................................................................................... 8 Massacre and deportation of Azerbaijanis at the beginning of the 20th century .......................... 10 The massacres of 1905-1906. ..................................................................................................... 10 General information ................................................................................................................... 10 Genocide of Moslem Turks through 1905-1906 in Karabagh ...................................................... 13 Genocide of 1918-1920 ............................................................................................................... 15 Genocide over Azerbaijani nation in March of 1918 ................................................................... 15 Massacres in Baku. March 1918................................................................................................. 20 Massacres in Erivan Province (1918-1920) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]