Prevalence and Determinants of Stunting in a Conflict-Ridden Border Region in Armenia - a Cross-Sectional Study Arin A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prevalence and Determinants of Stunting in a Conflict-Ridden Border Region in Armenia - a Cross-Sectional Study Arin A A. Balalian et al. BMC Nutrition (2017) 3:85 DOI 10.1186/s40795-017-0204-9 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Prevalence and determinants of stunting in a conflict-ridden border region in Armenia - a cross-sectional study Arin A. Balalian1,2*, Hambardzum Simonyan1, Kim Hekimian3, Richard J. Deckelbaum3 and Aelita Sargsyan1 Abstract Background: Despite global efforts, stunting remains a public health problem in several developing countries. The prevalence of stunting among 0- to 5-year-old children in Armenia has increased from 17% in 2000 to 19% in 2010. A baseline study was conducted among preschool children in Berd, a region near the northeastern border of Armenia that has experienced intermittent military tension for over 20 years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 594 children aged 6-month- 6 years old and their caregivers in our analysis, to assess the prevalence and determinants of stunting. We calculated the anthropometric measurements and hemoglobin levels of children; analyzed children’s stool and conducted a survey with children’scaregivers.We employed the hierarchical logistic regression model to explore the predictors of stunting among 25–72 months old children and multivariable logistic regression models to investigate the predictors of stunting among 6–24 months old children. Individual and residence level variables were included in the models including anemia, minimum dietary diversity, mothers’ height, the overall duration of breastfeeding, birthweight, child’s history of diarrhea and mean socio-economic score. Results: The prevalence of stunting was significantly higher among the 6–24 months old children (13.3%) compared to the children aged 25–72 months old (7.8%). We did not find any differences in the prevalence of stunting by place of residence in either age group. The 6–24 months old children who consumed at least four food groups during the previous day (minimum dietary diversity) had 72% lower odds of being stunted (p < 0.05). Each kilogram increase in birthweight was associated with 76% lower odds of being stunted (OR = 0.24, p < 0.01). Mother’sheightsignificantly decreased the odds of stunting among the children 25–72- months old (OR = 0.86, p < 0.001). BMI was also a significant predictor of stunting among both age-groups. Conclusions: The study results highlight the significance of mother’s height, birthweight, and adequate complementary feeding to reduce stunting. Further studies are needed to determine the possible association of anemia and stunting with the ongoing conflict in the region, as well as socioeconomic conditions and food insecurity in the region. Keywords: Stunting, Conflict, Armenia, Infant and child nutrition, Growth * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 1Fund for Armenian Relief of America, #22 Khorenatsi Street, Yerevan, Armenia 2Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Room #1616, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. A. Balalian et al. BMC Nutrition (2017) 3:85 Page 2 of 13 Background According to the ADHS, the prevalence of stunting in Several studies have found that protracted conflicts have 2010 was 16.1% in the Tavush province [16] which was an adverse impact on health [1–3]. Current on-going one of the regions with the highest prevalence of stunt- conflicts in the former Soviet states, such as Ukraine, ing in Armenia. Frequent tensions and skirmishes along and in the nearby Middle East certainly have an impact the Armenian–Azerbaijani border have increased in on childhood health [4, 5]. Armenia is one such conflict- recent years [31–33], resulting in diminished agricultural ridden former Soviet country, located in the Caucasus capacity and affecting socioeconomic conditions in this region. Long-standing military tensions may exacerbate region. Tensions are intense in the Berd region in par- health and nutrition status of vulnerable populations ticular, because of its proximity to the border between affected by such circumstances, particularly young chil- Armenia and Azerbaijan. dren [6]. The growing trend of stunting in Armenia necessitates According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a thorough investigation to understand its risk factors to 54% of all child deaths are associated with undernutri- inform policies and interventions to reverse the trend. tion [7]. Despite global efforts to achieve the Millennium Although the determinants of stunting have been well Development Goals, the percentage of stunted children investigated in several studies, the specific precursors of under age five remains high. Since 1990, there has been stunting might vary among different countries and a steady decrease in stunting worldwide; however, it is regions [34]. This different pattern is evident among estimated that globally in 2016, 24% of children under former Soviet countries [30, 35]. Therefore, it is import- age five were still stunted [8, 9]. Stunting during child- ant to study the risk factors responsible for nutritional hood can lead to reduced immunity, increased suscepti- problems of children specific to Berd region in Armenia. bility to non-communicable diseases, impaired physical The main aim of this study was to determine the and mental development, and reduced productivity [10]. prevalence and determinants of stunting among pre- Several factors influence stunting, including the socio- school children in Berd city and its seven surrounding economic status of the household, parents’ education, rural communities, a vulnerable border region in the anemia, soil-transmitted helminths (STH) infections, Tavush province in the Republic of Armenia, which is diarrheal infections, dietary intake and complementary itself a low-middle income country. We specifically feeding [11–22]. Short overall duration of breastfeeding, explored if there are significant differences in the preva- as well as the late introduction of appropriate solid lence of stunting among the children 6–24 months and foods, have both been associated with stunting in many 25–72 months old. We also examined if the prevalence studies [18, 23–26] Birth outcomes such as low birth of stunting in each age group was different by place of weight and birth length are also important factors residence. We further investigated the influence of that are associated with higher prevalence of stunting anemia, soil-transmitted helminths, feeding practices, [24, 27, 28]. dietary intake, maternal and household characteristics In a study conducted in Sri Lanka, maternal height and birth outcomes on stunting among children 6– was inversely related to the prevalence of stunting [18]. 24 months and 25–72 months old. Low birthweight was associated with higher rates of stunting in the same study. Socioeconomic status of the Methods family was associated with stunting in among school Study design children in Nigeria [29]. In another study conducted in This cross-sectional study included anthropometric (height, Nigeria, children who did not receive timely comple- weight) measurements, blood tests to measure hemoglobin mentary feeding and children with less than minimum (HgB) levels of 6-month to 6-year-old children, and stool food diversity had higher odds of being stunted. [22]. analysis for intestinal STH in 12-months to 6-year-old chil- There are limited data regarding infant and child nutri- dren. The survey also included a questionnaire for care- tion status in the Republic of Armenia. The Armenian givers (mainly mothers) to understand the determinants of Demographic and Health Survey (ADHS), conducted malnutrition in the target communities. The study was every 5 years, is the primary source of information regard- designed and conducted from September 2013 to March ing nutrition and child growth patterns. According to the 2014. 2010 ADHS, the prevalence of stunting among 0- to 5- year-old children increased to 19% from 17% in 2000 [16]. Study population A recent study conducted in Yerevan, the capital of The study population for the anemia analysis and an- Armenia, identified the prevalence of stunting as 17.9% thropometric measurements included all 6-month to among 5- to 17-month-old children, which is close to the 6 year-old children living in the city of Berd and seven 2010 ADHS estimated percentage of around 17.3% in surrounding rural communities (Chinchin, Varagavan, Yerevan [16, 30]. Paravakar, Verin Caghkavan, Nerkin Karmiraghbyur, A. Balalian et al. BMC Nutrition (2017) 3:85 Page 3 of 13 Tavush, and Aygepar). The only exclusion criteria were Parents were instructed to collect the first morning stool if the child was diagnosed with a blood coagulation or of their children. They were also instructed to refrigerate neurological disease; however, no child in our sample the stool samples and transport them to the nearest local met the exclusion criteria.
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Ninth Session Seventieth Year Agenda Items 33 and 38
    United Nations A/69/815–S/2015/170 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 March 2015 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-ninth session Seventieth year Agenda items 33 and 38 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 9 March 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Upon instructions from my Government, I have the honour to draw your attention to ongoing violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia recorded for February 2015 (see annex). During this period, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia continued intensive fire from their positions in the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan and from the territory of the Republic of Armenia on the positions of the armed forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan. As a result, two Azerbaijani servicemen were killed and one was wounded. The Republic of Armenia violated the ceasefire 1,426 times. Azerbaijan strongly condemns the continuous attempts by Armenia to escalate the situation on the front line and the deliberate targeting of the civilian population and civilian facilities. Azerbaijan will continue to take resolute measures against and respond adequately to Armenia’s ongoing aggression, violations of the ceasefire and other provocative acts. Peace and stability are contingent upon ending Armenia’s occupation of the territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan. As long as this occupation continues, human losses are inevitable on both sides, and the Republic of Armenia bears the full responsibility and should be held accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Level Risk Management M a N U
    LOCAL LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT M A N U A L Y E R E V A N 2012 1 LLRM EXECUTIVE LOCAL LEVEL RISK IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND 2 3 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT (LLRM) / FORMAT EXPERIENCE IN ARMENIA VULNERABILITY AND GENERAL APPROACHES AND CAPACITY 1.1 INFORMATION 2.1 3.1 PRINCIPLES APPLIED ASSESSMENT (VCA) HAZARDS RESOURCES AND THREATENING 3.2 PRACTICAL CASES TOOLS ARMENIA PROCESS A PREPARATORY PHASE DATA COLLECTION B AND RESEARCH C ANALYSIS D TOOL KIT PLANNING DRR MAINSTREAMING INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANS / DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION DRR AND CLIMATE LLRM RISK MANAGEMENT DRR AND GENDER M A N U A L EQUITY 2 Authors: Ashot Sargsyan UNDP, DRR Adviser Armen Chilingaryan UNDP, DRR Project Coordinator Susanna Mnatsakanyan UNDP DRR Project VCA Expert Experts: Hamlet Matevosyan Rector of the Crisis Management State Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hasmik Saroyan Climate Risk Management Expert LLRM/VCA implementation Armen Arakelyan Specialist Head of “Lore” Rescue Team This manual is prepared and published with financial support from UNDP within the framework of the Project Strengthening of National Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction Capacities in Armenia. Empowered lives The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Resilient nations United Nations or UNDP. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a result of consolidation of collective efforts of many professionals and experts from different organizations and agencies – members of the UN extended Disaster Management Team, which worked during the years hand-to-hand to support and facilitate the strengthening of Disaster Management national system in Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Armenia 06 Nights / 07 Days Package Highlights
    Discover Armenia 06 Nights / 07 Days Package Highlights: Yerevan: o Yerevan City Tour o Republic Square o Opera House o Cascade Complex o Mother Armenia Statue o Tsitsernakaberd Genocide Complex o Vernissage Market Areni: o Etchmiadzin Cathedral And Museum o Areni Wine factory o Areni 1 Cave Noravank Monastery o Khor-Virap Dilijan o Lake Sevan o Haghartsin Monastery o Visit to Tsaghkadzor Town with Cable Car Garni – Gerghard Monastery o Temple of Garni o Gerghard Monastery o Megerian Carpet Museum o Etchmiadzin Cathedral Meal: 06 Breakfasts & 06 Dinner Hotel List: - o Yerevan: Ani Plaza Hotel or DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Yerevan City Centre Or Similar Suggested Day Wise Itinerary Day 01: Armenia - Welcomes You!!! Welcome to Armenia!!! On Arrival Proceed to Immigration Formalities. Later, Meet & Greet by Our Local Representative / Tour Manager. Later, Sit Back in The Comfort of Your Coach, As We Drive You To Hotel. Afternoon Check-In to Hotel and Relax on Your First Full Day by Getting Familiar With Your Hotel And Enjoy Hotel Amenities. In Evening, Enjoy Dinner at Indian Restaurant. Overnight, Stay at Hotel. Meal: Dinner Day 02: City Tour of Yerevan | Tsitsernakaberd Genocide Complex After an American Breakfast at Hotel, today we will explore Yerevan City. We start our City Tour with Republic Square which Is the Central Town Square in Yerevan, – also famously called “Heart of Yerevan”. It Consists of Two Sections: An Oval Roundabout and A Trapezoid-Shaped Section Which Contains A Pool with Musical Fountains. This Architectural Ensemble Includes the Government House, The History Museum and The National Gallery, Armenia Marriott Hotel and The Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Transport and Communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identical Letters Dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé D’Affaires A.I
    United Nations A/70/849–S/2016/398 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda items 35 and 40 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Identical letters dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council Further to the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, dated 20 April 2016, on the recent escalation of the situation at the line of contact of the armed forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan and the border between the two States, I would like to draw your attention to the latest gross violation by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia of the ceasefire agreement of 5 April 2016, reached in Moscow between the Chiefs of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia, with the assistance of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The armed forces of Armenia, while concentrating additional forces and military equipment at the line of contact, starting from 23 April 2016, fired intensively on the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and the civilian settlements near the confrontation line using large-calibre weapons, mortars, grenade launchers and heavy artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Sixth National Report
    SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • Kotayk Province – Under2 Coalition-Appendix
    Kotayk Province – Under2 Coalition-Appendix PROFILE The Province situated at the central part of Armenia and covers an area of 2,089 km2 (807 sq mi) (7% of total area of Armenia). Kotayk is bordered by Lori Province from the north, Tavush Province from the northeast, Gegharkunik Province from the east, Aragatsotn Province from the west, and Ararat Province and the capital Yerevan from the south. Kotayk is the only province in Armenia that has no borders with foreign countries. Demographic and economic profile: Country: Republic of Armenia Province’s Population: 254,397, 8.4% of the entire population of Armenia Country GDP (PPP): Total: $ 26.560 billion (2016) Per Capita: $ 8,881 (2016) TARGETS The Republic of Armenia ratified the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in May 1993 and as a developing country not included in Annex I to the Convention. In December 2002, Armenia ratified the UNFCCC Kyoto Protocol. On September 2016, Armenia signed the Paris Agreement. According to Armenia’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC) submitted to the UNFCCC in 2015, the country (respectively the Kotayk Province) intends to limit aggregate GHG emissions to 633 million tCO2e for the period between 2015 and 2050. An annual average of GHG emission per capita aims to be limited to 5.4tCO2e for the period of 2015-2050, while Armenia’s GHG emissions comprised 2.14tCO2e per capita in 2010. TOOLS Armenia (respectively the Kotayk Province) outlines some of the priority sectors in mitigation and adaptation which are as follows. Energy supply Transport Land use and forestry Water resource management Energy supply The energy sector in Armenia has achieved a range of reforms over the past decades, which have led to a strong payment discipline with collections for electricity (100% of sales), reforms for the energy subsidies and a competent regulatory agency put in place for the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Torchbearer • }Ahagir St
    The Torchbearer • }ahagir St. John Armenian Church of Greater Detroit 22001 Northwestern Highway • Southfield, MI 48075 248.569.3405 (phone) • 248.569.0716 (fax) • www.stjohnsarmenianchurch.org The Reverend Father Garabed Kochakian ~ Pastor The Reverend Father Diran Papazian ~ Pastor Emeritus Deacon Rubik Mailian ~ Director of Sacred Music and Pastoral Assistant mardigian family honored at annual assembly banquet..... Service. Vision. Inspiration. These words set the tone at the Grand Banquet of the 111th Diocesan Assembly, where clergy, delegates, and community members gathered to honor a distinguished couple for their dedicated support of the Armenian Church and humanitarian projects in the Republic of Armenia. The banquet was hosted by St. David Church of Boca Raton, Fla., at the Marriott Hotel in the city center on Friday evening, May 3rd. Edward and Janet Mardigian, of the St. John Church of Southfield, Mich., were honored with the “Armenian Church Members of the Year” award. A video presentation highlighted their involvement with the Fund for Armenian Relief, through which the Mardigians have helped support the Homeless Children’s Center in Yerevan and are currently building a state-of-the-art facility to house the Octet Music School in Gyumri. Their most recent initiative, called “Breaking the Cycle of Poverty, Developing Thriving Communities,” is aimed at relieving poverty and diminishing its effect on children and families in Armenia’s Tavush province. This latest gift to FAR is one of the largest donations ever contributed to the organization.“They have given, and they have inspired others to give as well,” said outgoing Diocesan Council chair Oscar Tatosian.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Eighth Session Sixty-Ninth Year Agenda Items 34 and 38
    United Nations A/68/829–S/2014/249 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2014 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-eighth session Sixty-ninth year Agenda items 34 and 38 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 3 April 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General In accordance with instructions received from the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan, I have the honour to draw your attention to ongoing violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia recorded for March 2014 (see annex). As seen from the annexed table, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia continued intensive fire from their positions in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan and from the territory of Armenia at the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan, as well as at populated areas and civilian objects situated in the vicinity of the front line. As a result, one Azerbaijani serviceman, Elvin Hasanov, was killed, and one civilian was wounded. I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 34 and 38, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Agshin Mehdiyev Ambassador Permanent Representative 14-29246 (E) 210414 *1429246* A/68/829 S/2014/249 Annex to the letter dated 3 April 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Violations of the ceasefire by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia for March 2014a Casualties and No.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • After the 2014 Escalation: the Front Line Between Armenia and Azerbaijan Overview and Key Outcomes
    JANUARY 2015 After the 2014 escalation: The front line between Armenia and Azerbaijan Overview and Key Outcomes OVER THE LAST TWO DECADES, the standoff between Armenians and Azerbaijanis has often been characterised as ‘no war, no peace’ as there has been little progress on resolving Armenia-Azerbaijan: the Nagorny Karabakh (NK) conflict. The unresolved conflict continues to pose ongoing and Protect Civilians Project evolving challenges on the ground, including insecurity, long-term displacement, and ingrained This study was made possible by mistrust. the support of the Swiss Federal In 2014, however, the situation escalated towards ‘more war and less peace’, as both Department of Foreign Affairs. It is Azerbaijani and Armenian villagers describe it. The year was marked by increased fighting, part of Saferworld’s project, jointly implemented with Civil Society more human loss and damage, and several major security incidents. Institute (Yerevan) and Society for One group particularly hit hard by this escalation are ordinary Azerbaijanis and Armenians Humanitarian Research (Baku), living on either side of the border. Communities on both sides report loss and injury and a which aims to study and publicising great increase of worry and fear. Parents are worried about their children’s safety. The fighting the security concerns of the has made it hard to continue farming, choking the main source of income for most households. communities living near Armenian- Azerbaijani frontlines and add In response, both sides should explore ways of de-escalating the conflict at a local level, so their voice to security provision and that communities are not caught up in spirals of escalation.
    [Show full text]