DOCSLIB.ORG

Vector Pipeline TM Vector Pipeline Commercial Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vector Pipeline TM Vector Pipeline Commercial Products TM Vector Pipeline MPSC Meeting March 13, 2013 Overview TM Vector Pipeline • Introduction • Vector System • Commercial Products • System Utilization • 2013 Operation Activities • Historical Highlights • Michigan Connections / Supply Hub • North American Gas Fundamentals • Discussion TM System Map Vector Pipeline TM Vector Pipeline Commercial Products • Firm Services – FT-1 Firm Transportation – FT-H Hourly Firm Transportation – FT-L Limited Firm Transportation • Interruptible Services – IT-1 Interruptible Transportation – PALS-1 Park and Loan Service – TTS Title Transfer Service – MBA Management of Balancing Agreement Competitive Tariff Rates to Michigan TM Vector Pipeline Commodity Basis to Henry Hub (HH) SW SE Chicago Michigan Vector HH + $0.39 ANR HH + $0.41 + $0.02 Trunkline HH + $0.42 + $0.03 Panhandle HH + $0.46 + $0.07 • Based on Henry Hub Prices from 02/27/2013, one year starting April 2013 • Includes fuel based on one year average TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 In-service - December 1, 2000 Initial Delivery Rate – 250,000 Dth/D Annual Deliveries – 257 MMDth Five Original Shippers New Interconnections • Washington 10 – DTE Storage • Crown Point – NIPSCO • La Porte – NIPSCO TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Highland Compressor Station In-service Capacity increase to 925 MDth/D (Annual Long haul) New Interconnections • Wheeler – Crossroads • Crete – Crete Energy Plant • Jackson – Kinder Morgan Plant TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New Interconnections • St. John – ANR Pipeline • Hartland – Consumers Energy • Ray – Consumers Energy Modify Dawn for Receipts TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New Interconnections • Guardian • Bluewater First Customer Survey TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New Interconnections • Courtright – Union Gas First Engine Replacement First Expansion Open Season File for First Expansion TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Smart Pig Inspection TM Implement QuickNom TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Expansion In-service Joliet Compressor Station Washington Compressor Station Capacity increase to 1,171 MDth/D (Annual Long haul) 2nd Expansion Open Season and Filing Relocated Gas Control/Scheduling to Houston TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 New Interconnections • Greenfield – Greenfield Energy Centre • Sombra – Enbridge Gas Distribution New Dawn Filter/Separators Installed TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2nd Expansion In-service Athens Compressor Station Springville & Highland Modifications Capacity increase to 1,275 MDth/D (Annual Long haul) Guardian Interconnect expanded to 800 MDth/D TM Vector Pipeline 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Implemented current rates Reversed flow to Joilet for the first time 4 Scheduled engine change outs Enhanced Tie-in/Lateral Inspections Average Dth/Day Vector Pipeline 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 - Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Highland TM Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Vector Deliveries Dec-02 Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Dec-03 Mar-04 Jun-04 Canada Sep-04 Dec-04 Mar-05 Jun-05 Sep-05 U.S. Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 Sep-06 Long Capacity Haul Long Dec-06 Mar-07 Washington Jun-07 & Joliet Sep-07 Dec-07 Mar-08 Jun-08 Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Athens Sep-09 Dec-09 Mar-10 Jun-10 Sep-10 Dec-10 Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 TM Vector Pipeline 2013 Activities • Engine Replacements – Washington – Spring 2013 – Two Units – Springville – Fall 2013 – One unit • Internal Pipeline Inspection – Required every seven years – 42 inch mainline & 36 lease-line (DTE Gas) – Spring 2013 Vector TM Vector Pipeline Michigan Supply Hub Lake Huron WISCONSIN MICHIGAN Lake Michigan Washington ONTARIO Highland Dawn (Union) Detroit Chicago Athens Lake Erie Joliet Springville Vector TM Vector Pipeline Expansion Capabilities • Lake Huron Long Haul MICHIGAN • 105 MDth/d Incremental Capacity • 2 New Compressor Units • Lease Line Loop Lake Michigan Washington ONTARIO WISCONSIN Dawn (Union) Highland Detroit Chicago Athens Lake Erie Springville Joliet • Short Haul ILLINOIS• 300 -800 MDth/d Incremental CapacityINDIANA • Lease Line Loop • Potential Compression Michigan Connections TM Vector Pipeline Sheridan Interconnection TM Vector Pipeline Michigan Production Up to 4.5 MMcf/d March, 2013 Eliminates Flare Gas Jackson Power Plant TM Vector Pipeline 550 MW Merchant Plant Direct Connect 113,000 Dth/d Delivery Capacity 17 Mile Lateral Owned By Consumers Consumers Interconnections TM Vector Pipeline Capacities Hartland: 202,000 Dth/d Ray: 282,800 Dth/d Vector Benefits Deliveries into heart of SE MI. Reduces compression needs. By-passes Line 1200 restrictions. Segmentation allows for supply from Chicago or Dawn Hubs simultaneously. DTE Gas Interconnections TM Vector Pipeline Capacities Milford: 1,515,000 Dth/d Belle River: 1,515,000 Dth/d Vector Benefits Deliveries into heart of SE MI. Deliveries directly into Belle River Storage Complex. Enhances B.R. to Milford Line. Segmentation allows for supply from Chicago or Dawn Hubs simultaneously. Michigan Storage Connections TM Vector Pipeline Consumers – Ray 57 Bcf – Direct (inc. base gas) 136 Bcf – Total System DTE Storage – Wash. 10 90 Bcf DTE Gas – Belle River 69 Bcf – Direct 137 Bcf – Total System Bluewater – Lenox 36 Bcf Note: Cyclable volumes except where noted. North American Fundamentals TM Vector Pipeline Shale gas in the Northeast, South and WCSB account for most of North America supply growth Cumulative Change from 2011 (Bcf/d) North America 2015 – 3.6 2020 – 17.6 2025 – 28.1 WCSB 2015 – (1.0) 2020 – 2.5 Eastern Canada 2025 – 3.7 2015 – 0.1 2020 – (0.1) 2025 – (0.0) Rockies West Coast 2015 – (0.0) Appalachia 2015 – (0.0) 2020 – 0.8 2015 – 3.9 2020 – 0.2 2025 – 1.6 2020 – 10.5 2025 – 0.4 MidCon 2015 – 0.6 2025 – 13.6 San Juan 2020 – 0.6 2015 – (0.4) 2025 – 1.4 Gulf Coast 2020 – (0.7) 2015 – 0.1 2025 – (0.6) 2020 – 2.5 Supply reductions 2025 – 5.6 shown in red Permian Offshore 2015 – 0.9 Source: Enbridge July 2012 View 2015 – (0.6) As Presented at Vector Customer Meeting 2020 – 1.8 2020 – (0.5) October 2012 2025 – 2.6 2025 – (0.2) North American Fundamentals TM Vector Pipeline WCSB gas production will reverse its decline WCSB Gas Production 18 Historical Projected 16 14 12 10 Bcf/d 8 6 4 2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: NEB, Enbridge As Presented at Vector Customer Meeting October 2012 North American Fundamentals Appalachian production will continue to grow rapidly TM Vector Pipeline and will largely drive NA market dynamics Appalachian Shale Production 16 14 12 Utica 10 Bcf/d) ( 8 6 4 2 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Note: The Utica shale play is in the very early stages of development. Based on the Source: NEB, Enbridge growth experienced with the Marcellus play, the Utica production profile could be As Presented at Vector Customer substantially higher than shown. Meeting October, 2012 North American Fundamentals TM Vector Pipeline Over the next five years, growing shale gas basins will displace flows from traditional basins Change in flows between 2012 and 2017 WCSB Rockies Appalachia Mid Continent Permian Gulf Coast Red = Decrease Blue = Increase MX Source: Enbridge July 2012 View Exports LNG As Presented at Vector Customer Meeting Exports GoM October 2012 Offshore 29 North American Fundamentals TM Vector Pipeline Vector’s Observations • Continued Canadian supply into Chicago • Continued Mid-Continent supply into Chicago • Growth in Marcellus and Utica basins • Marcellus back to Chicago via REX • Need for Nexus Project • Displacement of SE supply into Midwest Benefit / Summary TM Vector Pipeline • Vector Supports Michigan • Corporate Office • Infrastructure • High pressure deliverability into SE MI • Promotes Michigan storage activity • Competitive Rates • Access to multiple supply basins • Reliable delivery into Michigan Vector Contacts TM Vector Pipeline John Donaldson - President (734) 462- 0238 [email protected] Belinda Friis – Chief Compliance Officer Roland Vandenbroeck – Mgr Acct / Finance (734) 462-7621 (734) 462-0239 [email protected] [email protected] Matt Malinowski - Mgr Market Development Amy Bruhn - Mgr Transportation Services (734) 462-0236 (734) 462-0237 [email protected] [email protected] David Bilyk - Mgr Operations / Engineering Corrie Towns – Senior Engineer (734) 462-0235 (734) 462-7619 [email protected] [email protected] Bob Smith – Mgr Regulatory / Admin Lisa Steinman – Office Manager (734) 462-0234 (734) 462-0232 [email protected] [email protected] Fax: (734) 462-0231 www.vector-pipeline.com TM Vector Pipeline.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies
    File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies regulated under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act Commission of the Canada Energy Regulator (Commission) Pipeline Financial Resources Requirements Update on Approval of Financial Resources Plans Background Subsection 138(1) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act (CER Act) requires pipeline companies to maintain financial resources equal to their absolute liability level. The Pipeline Financial Requirements Regulations (Regulations), which came into force on 11 July 2019, set out absolute liability limits for the non-major oil pipeline companies1 (i.e., all other oil, gas, and commodity pipeline companies). On 29 March 2019, the National Energy Board (NEB) issued the Pipeline Financial Requirements Guidelines (Guidelines). Included in the Guidelines was a schedule for companies to submit their financial resources plans for review and approval. By 16 April 2019, the first Financial Resources Plans from companies with an absolute liability class of Oil Class 2 and 3 were filed with the NEB for review. This was followed by companies with an absolute liability class of Gas Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 filing their Financial Resources Plans. Companies with an absolute liability class of Other Commodity filed their Financial Resources Plans by 11 June 2019. Companies whose Financial Resources Plans were previously approved are listed in Appendix I under the headings “Approved as of” for the following dates: 17 July 2019, 28 August 2019, 18 December 2019, and 3 June 2020. The Commission continues to consider the Financial Resources Plans from Oil, Gas, and Other Commodity companies filed to-date. This letter updates and replaces the Commission’s previous letter dated 3 June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline Projects with Length Greater Than 20 Miles
    12/29/2015 Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Pipeline projects with DEC-29-2015 Pipeline and Processing Facilities : SAVED REPORTS Length Greater than 1:37 PM 20 Miles Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Holding Company or Parent Operating Company: Project Status Project Project Name: Length Organization: Type: (New Miles) AK (6 Pipeline projects) Energia Cura Fairbanks Pipeline Doubtful New Arctic Fox (Fairbanks Pipeline) 443 Company Linc Energy Linc Energy On New Umiat Oil Field Pipeline 80 Hold/Postponed Alaska Housing Finance Alaska Gasline On New Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline (ASAP) 737 Corporation Development Hold/Postponed Corporation BP BP Under New Point Thomson Gas Field 22 Construction NovaGold Resources Inc. Donlin Gold, LLC Advanced New Donlin Gold 312 Development Alaska LNG Early New Alaska LNG (AKLNG) 800 Development TOT 2,394 AL (6 Pipeline projects) Southern Company Alabama Power Under New Gaston Natural Gas Pipeline 30 Construction Spectra Energy Spectra Energy Advanced New Sabal Trail 515 Development Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 1 20 Pipeline Company LLC Development Miller Energy Resources Early New Trans - Foreland Pipeline (TFPL) system 23 Development Laclede Gas Alagasco On-going Replacement Alagasco Pipeline replacement program 850 PRP Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 2 and 3 24 Pipeline Company LLC Development TOT 1,462 Alberta (43 Pipeline projects) TransCanada Imperial Oil Early New Mackenzie Gas Project 758 Development Enbridge Inc. Enbridge Income Fund Advanced New Northern Gateway Pipeline (westward 731 Development crude for export) TransCanada TransCanada Advanced New Keystone XL 1,661 Development Enhance Energy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Energy Research Institute
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System SUMMARY REPORT – VOLUME 2 Peter H. Howard P.Eng David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic Study No. 113 – Summary Report Volume 2 ISBN No. 1-896091-81-4 Purchased by the State of Alaska January 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective CAPACITY OF THE WESTERN CANADA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT VOLUME 2 ii Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2008 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazine and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-896091-81-4 Authors: Peter Howard David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE #150, 3512 – 33 STREET NW CALGARY, ALBERTA CANADA T2L A6 TELEPHONE: (403) 282-1231 January 2008 Printed in Canada January 2008 Canadian Energy Research Institute iii The Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) is a cooperative research organization established by government and industry parties in 1975. Our mission is to produce relevant, independent, objective economic research and education in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, and the public. The sponsors of the Institute are Natural Resources Canada; the Alberta Department of Energy; the Private Sector Sponsors of the Canadian Energy Research Institute (composed of more than one hundred corporate members from the energy production, transportation, marketing, distribution, and consuming sectors in Canada and abroad and the financial community); the University of Calgary; the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board; the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines; the Northwest Territories Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Alberta Research Council; and the Alberta Utilities Consumer Advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed To
    North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed to Foster Increased Gas Trade Between the United States and Canada INTRODUCTION capacity additions are projected to occur in the Midwestern and Northeastern corridors. Most of As a part of its regulatory oversight the planned capacity additions provide improved responsibilities, the Office of Natural Gas & access to western Canadian supplies; however, Petroleum Import and Export Activities several of the projects are being built to transport (Import/Export Office) performs various analytical Canadian natural gas reserves located offshore studies related to the import and export of natural Nova Scotia from Sable Island. gas. This Quarterly Focus looks at some of the planned pipeline construction projects which, if The Import/Export Office has obtained built, would increase the ability to transport information about these individual projects from additional volumes of natural gas between the various sources, including regulatory filings made United States and Canada. For the most part, these with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposed projects are being designed to increase (FERC), Department of Energy (DOE), company the importation of natural gas. A similar review of representatives and Internet Web sites, and various proposed construction projects was the subject of trade journals. The review of proposed projects the Quarterly Focus written for the Quarterly include a number of projects recently announced Report issued in the second quarter of 1996; this by the sponsoring companies which have not report merely updates the status of some of the advanced much beyond the conceptual stage in projects reviewed earlier and examines some of development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Annual Report
    THE ENERGY BRIDGE 1999 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Highlights 2 Letter to Shareholders 8 Operations Review 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 31 Financial Statements and Notes 57 Supplementary Information 58 Five Year Consolidated Highlights 60 Shareholder and Investor Information BRIDGING THE GAP Enbridge bridges the gap between energy supply and the customer, providing seamless service and delivery. Enbridge is also bridging the gap from the present to an innovative and exciting energy future. As a transporter of energy, Enbridge operates, in Canada and the United States, the world’s longest crude oil and liquids pipeline system. The Company also is involved in liquids marketing and international energy projects, and has a growing involvement in the natural gas transmission and midstream businesses. As a distributor of energy, Enbridge owns and operates Canada’s largest natural gas distribution company, which provides gas to 1.5 million customers in Ontario, Quebec and New York State. Enbridge is also involved in the distribution of electricity, and provides retail energy products and services to a growing number of Canadian and United States markets. The Company employs approximately 5,500 people, primarily in Canada, the United States and Latin America. Enbridge common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ENB”, and on The NASDAQ National Market in the United States under the symbol “ENBR”. Information about Enbridge is available on the World Wide Web at www.enbridge.com. Inuvik Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Fort McMurray Edmonton Hardisty Ottawa Montreal Cornwall Casper Toronto Salt Lake City Dawn Chicago Toledo Patoka Liquids Pipelines Jose Terminal Gas Pipelines Coveñas Gas Distribution Cusiana/ Electric Power Distribution Cupiagua Gas Gathering and Processing Bogota Enbridge Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • NAESB Members
    North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 NAESB membership extends to all employees of the member company, but does not extend to other companies with which the member company may have an organizational relationship – such as partnerships, liaisons, affiliates, subsidiaries, holding companies or parent companies. Should those companies be interested in joining they would hold separate memberships. Membership is specific to the quadrant(s) and segment(s) in which the company holds membership. Should an individual wish to represent a quadrant or segment in which the company member does not hold a membership, that individual will be considered a non-member. To obtain information on membership or verify membership status, please contact the NAESB Office ([email protected]). NAESB Membership Report - Quadrant/Segment Membership Analysis Number of Members WGQ Segments TOTAL 114 End Users 15 Distributors 22 Pipelines 35 Producers 9 Services 33 RMQ Segments TOTAL 36 Retail Electric End Users/Public Agencies 17 Retail Gas Market Interests Segment 8 Retail Electric Utilities 6 Retail Electric Service Providers/Suppliers 5 WEQ Segments TOTAL 131 End Users 15 Distributors 17 Transmission 41 Generation 20 Marketers 20 None Specified 1 Independent Grid Operators/Planners 7 Technology /Services 10 Total Membership 281 Page 1 North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 Organization Seg1 Contact Retail Markets Quadrant (RMQ) Members: 1 Agility CIS s Mary Do 2 American Public Gas Association (APGA) g Donnie Sharp 3 Big Data Energy Services s J. Cade Burks, Jennifer Teel 4 California Energy Commission e Melissa Jones 5 California Public Utilities Commission e Katherine Stockton 6 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC u John Hudson 7 City of Houston e Ray Cruz 8 Dominion Energy u Brandon Stites 9 Duke Energy Corporation u Stuart Laval, David Lawrence 10 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Profile
    Out on the Tar Sands Mainline Mapping Enbridge’s Web of Pipelines A Corporate Profile of Pipeline Company Enbridge By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute Research Coordinator with Contributions from Tanya Roberts Davis Out on the Tar Sands Mainline: Mapping Enbridge’s Dirty Web of Pipelines May 2010 (partially updated, March 2012). The Polaris Institute The Polaris Institute is a public interest research and advocacy organization based in Canada. Since 1999 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies for civic action on major public policy issues, including energy security, water rights and free trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalf Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone : 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org For more information on the Polaris Institute’s energy campaign please visit www.tarsandswatch.org Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 1. Organizational Profile ...................................................................................................5 1.1 Enbridge’s Business Structure ....................................................................................5 1.1.1 Liquids
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Natural Gas
    About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines – Transporting Natural Gas The U.S. natural gas pipeline network is a highly U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network integrated transmission and distribution grid that can transport natural gas to and from nearly any location in the lower 48 States. The natural gas pipeline grid comprises: • More than 210 natural gas pipeline systems. • 300,000 miles of interstate and intrastate transmission pipelines (see mileage table). • More than 1,400 compressor stations that maintain pressure on the natural gas pipeline network and assure continuous forward movement of supplies (see map). • More than 11,000 delivery points, 5,000 click to enlarge receipt points, and 1,400 interconnection See Appendix A: Combined ‘Natural Gas points that provide for the transfer of natural Transportation’ maps gas throughout the United States. • 29 hubs or market centers that provide See Appendix B: Tables additional interconnections (see map). • 394 underground natural gas storage facilities (see map). Geographic Coverage of Pipeline Companies • 55 locations where natural gas can be United States - links to companies listed A-Z with U.S. map imported/exported via pipelines (see map). showing regional breakout detail • 5 LNG (liquefied natural gas) import facilities and 100 LNG peaking facilities. Northeast - CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV Learn more about the natural gas Midwest - IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI Southeast - AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN pipeline network: Southwest - AR, LA, NM, OK, TX Central - CO, IA, KS,
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency
    Pipeline Association for Public Awareness Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency . Adelphia Gateway, LLC (800) 747-3375 Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Facilities Scott Aharonian (610) 327-5331 [email protected] ADM (563) 242-1121 Natural Gas Pipeline and Ethanol Production Facilities Kevin Duffy (563) 241-4615 [email protected] AE2S Water Solutions (218) 791-7372 Produced Water & Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Facilities Tomas Solc (763) 463-5036 [email protected] Aera Energy, LLC (800) 247-5977 Hazardous Liquids and Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities Jeff Gurican (661) 665-5103 [email protected] Aka Energy Group, LLC (970) 737-2601 Natural Gas Gathering and Transmission Facilities Angie Huber (970) 764-6480 [email protected] Alliance Pipeline L.P. (800) 884-8811 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines Kevin Jenkins (713) 627-5986 [email protected] Alliant Energy - IPL (319) 365-8040 Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Facilities Lisa Howard (319) 786-7101 [email protected] Alliant Energy - WPL (800) 758-1576 Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Facilities Lisa Howard (319) 786-7101 [email protected] Ameren Illinois DTSC Member State: All States 9/26/2021 County: All Counties Page 1 of 42 Pipeline Association for Public Awareness Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency . Amplify Energy Corp. (307) 328-2348 Oil and CO2 Processing Facilities Gust Hatanelas (307) 392-2363 [email protected] Arrow Pipeline, LLC (866) 234-7473 Natural Gas and Petroleum Liquids Pipeline
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Pipelines Limited
    TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED BUSINESS AND SERVICES RESTRUCTURING AND MAINLINE 2012 – 2013 TOLLS APPLICATION PART B: BACKGROUND Appendix B1: Maps of the TransCanada Pipeline Systems SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 A A K Y E E W V I I N R TransGas Centra Gas CentraN Gas Holding Inc. Union Gas Nipigon Union Gas I P E Saskatoon E C SSDA SSDA G MDA WDA WDA NDA N EmpressSuffield E R Liebenthal SASKATCHEWAN Centra W Shackleton A RichmondBayhurst MDA Tunis Power L Western T BURSTALL Success ONTARIO S 2 Herbert Northern CABRI NDA 5 Zone HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee 9 CARON MANITOBA Zone 13 Welwyn TransCanada Canadian Mainline Mainline Current Map 391 REGINA Power Plant 17 GRENFELL Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Moose Welwyn 25 RAPID CITY Calstock NEW 392 Regina HEARST CALSTOCK Gros Cacouna Jaw KLOTZLAKE MATTICE 30 GERALDTON 86 88 KAPUSKASING PORTAGE 84 92 LA PRAIRIE VERMILION BAY JELLICOE80 GazMetro BRUN 34 KENORA 95 WILLISTON Moosomin 52 DRYDEN 77 393 Winnipeg ILE DES CHENES FALCON LAKE 49 Hearst Cochrane Northern BASIN SPRUCE 55 NDA 41 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing Tunis Power Plant Eastern Brandon 43 394 58 NIPIGON Zone MARTIN Kapuskasing 99 Kenora Dryden EAGLEHEAD Iroquois 60 75 Power Plant 102 Zone Monchy CANADA UPSALA 69 Nipigon Power Plant Falls GMi 1 Spruce 62 Larslan Nipigon 105 Union Québec City EDA 2 U.S.A. POTTER Saskatchewan 1 Emerson #1 Emerson #2 68 107 EDA NORTHERN 3 Enbridge TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline Zone RAMORE GREAT PLAINS (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK FALLS EDA LACHENAIE 110 QUEBEC MAINE Manitoba ST. VINCENT 2 Union Gas 4 THUNDERBAY SWASTIKA Eastern Trois-Rivières Saskatchewan Watford City LES CEDRES Zone Manitoba Great Lakes Gas Transmission SSMDA 112 St.
    [Show full text]
  • File OF-AF-ACE 01 19 December 2018 To: Group 2 Pipeline
    File OF-AF-ACE 01 19 December 2018 To: Group 2 Pipeline Companies Review of Abandonment Cost Estimates (ACE) for Group 2 Pipeline Companies (Group 2 ACE Review) On 8 June 2018, the National Energy Board (NEB or Board) issued a letter to all Group 2 pipeline companies informing them that the Board would commence its review of their ACE. The Board directed all Group 2 pipeline companies to file for approval by noon, 20 July 2018: • a copy of the last approved ACE (blacklined to show changes) and a clean copy of the updated ACE for approval, using the tables and instructions provided in the attached Appendix III; or • the information found in Appendix II of the 8 June 2018 letter which the Board would use to determine the ACE amounts. On 6 November 2018, the Board issued a letter to Group 2 Pipeline Companies that had not filed an updated ACE. The companies identified in the letter were to file their ACE by 20 November 2018. Board Assessment of Group 2 pipeline companies’ ACE The Board has considered the ACE filings that were filed in response to the Board’s 8 June 2018 letter, and has separated them into three categories: Category A, Category B and Category C. Category A For those Group 2 pipeline companies listed in Category A, the Board is satisfied with the cost estimates as filed, at this time. A list of those Group 2 pipeline companies in Category A is found in Appendix I. The Board does not require anything further from these Group 2 companies with respect to this Group 2 ACE Review proceeding.
    [Show full text]