DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcanada Pipelines Limited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transcanada Pipelines Limited TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED BUSINESS AND SERVICES RESTRUCTURING AND MAINLINE 2012 – 2013 TOLLS APPLICATION PART B: BACKGROUND Appendix B1: Maps of the TransCanada Pipeline Systems SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 A A K Y E E W V I I N R TransGas Centra Gas CentraN Gas Holding Inc. Union Gas Nipigon Union Gas I P E Saskatoon E C SSDA SSDA G MDA WDA WDA NDA N EmpressSuffield E R Liebenthal SASKATCHEWAN Centra W Shackleton A RichmondBayhurst MDA Tunis Power L Western T BURSTALL Success ONTARIO S 2 Herbert Northern CABRI NDA 5 Zone HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee 9 CARON MANITOBA Zone 13 Welwyn TransCanada Canadian Mainline Mainline Current Map 391 REGINA Power Plant 17 GRENFELL Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Moose Welwyn 25 RAPID CITY Calstock NEW 392 Regina HEARST CALSTOCK Gros Cacouna Jaw KLOTZLAKE MATTICE 30 GERALDTON 86 88 KAPUSKASING PORTAGE 84 92 LA PRAIRIE VERMILION BAY JELLICOE80 GazMetro BRUN 34 KENORA 95 WILLISTON Moosomin 52 DRYDEN 77 393 Winnipeg ILE DES CHENES FALCON LAKE 49 Hearst Cochrane Northern BASIN SPRUCE 55 NDA 41 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing Tunis Power Plant Eastern Brandon 43 394 58 NIPIGON Zone MARTIN Kapuskasing 99 Kenora Dryden EAGLEHEAD Iroquois 60 75 Power Plant 102 Zone Monchy CANADA UPSALA 69 Nipigon Power Plant Falls GMi 1 Spruce 62 Larslan Nipigon 105 Union Québec City EDA 2 U.S.A. POTTER Saskatchewan 1 Emerson #1 Emerson #2 68 107 EDA NORTHERN 3 Enbridge TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline Zone RAMORE GREAT PLAINS (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK FALLS EDA LACHENAIE 110 QUEBEC MAINE Manitoba ST. VINCENT 2 Union Gas 4 THUNDERBAY SWASTIKA Eastern Trois-Rivières Saskatchewan Watford City LES CEDRES Zone Manitoba Great Lakes Gas Transmission SSMDA 112 St. Genevieve Zone Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline Zone O R STITTSVILLE S U P E R I CORNWALL Montréal 3 L A K E Temiscaming 5 Zone HAILEYBURY North Bay Western 116 DEUX RIVIERES 148 East Hereford 4 1206 CANDIAC802 Sudbury Junction North Bay 147 Augusta MONTANA THIEF RIVER FALLS North North Bay 6 Zone MARTEN RIVER Power Plant 1217Ottawa Bismarck SHEVLIN Bay Philipsburg NORTH PNGTS 5 Sault Ste. Marie Napierville Pipeline 7 DAKOTA MINNESOTA NORTH BAY PEMBROKE 1211 6 Cornwall N 7 10 SUNDRIDGE Gas iagara 119 Waddington Transm DEER RIVER 10A G IROQUOIS1401 Westbrook E Iroquois ission Northern Border Pipeline Company Viking Gas Transmission 8 9 O Huntsville 8 Carlton R BROCKVILLE 144 L UnionB G Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. CLOQUET A A I Bracebridge Brockville K Y A BRACEBRIDGE N.H. N 123 KINGSTON POWDER RIVER E 142 M&NE/PNGTS Joint Proposed Crystal Falls St. Vermont IRON RIVER NCDA Lawrence Facilities BREVORT H BELLEVILLE North Gas BASIN WAKEFIELD NAUBINWAY 139 Gas Concord Bison Pipeline GOODMAN U Country Systems 9 Orillia Pipeline Neptun Northern Natural Pipeline 11 Bison Pipeline Deward R CROGHAN WISCONSIN O BARRIE 127 Kingston MOUNTAIN BLUE LAKE CENTRAL CHARLTONN 1 Evere RAPID RIVER Curtis Palmer CRYSTAL FALLS COLD SPRINGS S.CHESTER 15 Hydro Facilities 10 Enbridge 134 136 COBOURG KPUC VT. St. Paul RAPID RIVER BOWMANVILLE Dracut NE G BIG HORN BASIN Alliance Pipeline Empire State Castleton EXCELSIOR Toronto Boston BOYNE FALLS MAPLE 130 Power Plant CDA Toronto A R I O Little Falls MASS. 11 MICHIGAN O N T K E MARSHFIELD ANR A ATHENS Pierre Green Bay L N Parkway Union LINCOLN Union WRIGHT WEYAUWEGA A FARWELL 12 Farwell Hamilton Niagara Tennessee Gas G 12 SOUTH I REED CITY ORIENT Kirkwall Chippawa EDA Providence H CDA NEW YORK W.G.WOOLFOLK Niagara Spur Loop Hartford R.I. WYOMING C GOODWELL CNG Transmission WIND RIVER BASIN 13 I 13 National Fuel Gas Millennium DAKOTA M MICHIGAN CAPAC 1301 209 211 Tennessee Gas Dover CONN. ANR KEWASKUM WINFIELD Sarnia Texas Eastern Casper E BASIN Union Gas 1703 MICH. CONSOLIDATED Algonquin Gas Pipeline K Sioux Falls GAS CO. MUTTONVILLE Dawn Transmission Brookfield A Grand Rapids L LINCOLN Tennessee Gas St. Clair KIRKWALL ANCASTEREastern Madison Lansing OTISVILLE E Ellisburg Ventura Milwaukee HAMILTON I EATON RAPIDS Detroit R National Fuel Gas Ramapo JANESVILLE E Southwest E Zone New York Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC K DOUGLASTOWN A IOWA L Leidy N 14 WOODSTOCK Zone PENNSYLVANIA A NEBRASKA Vector Pipeline E ChicagoBRIDGMAN Southwest NI Source C Columbia Gas O Trenton Wyoming Interstate NGPLSANDWICH LAGRANGE C 15 Joliet Zone CNG Transmission I DEFIANCE Philadelphia Cheyenne 17 Texas Eastern T Harper ST.JOHN Des Moines 16 APPALACHIAN N.J. N 18 JOLIET19 A EnbridgeBASIN SWDA L Omaha NGPL Trailblazer NEW WINDSOR T BIRMINGHAM Union SWDATransmission Dover A Trunkline Gas Company OHIO (Dawn) MD. Lincoln INDIANA PORTLAND Columbia Gas Transmission Annapolis ILLINOIS (Dawn)Columbus DENVER-JULESBURG BASIN ANR Pipeline Williams TransContinental Gas DEL. SULPHUR SPRINGS Southern Star Central Gas Pipelin LINEVILLE Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Washington D.C. McCook Rockies Express Pipeline MAITLAND Texas Eastern Denver Rockies Express Pipeline REX East Springfield Indianapolis Cove Point Colorado Interstate Gas W. VIRGINIA VIRGINIA REX West Midwestern Gas Tra SHELBYVILLE MAP IS REPRESENTATIVE NOT TO SCALE COLORADO REX KANSAS HAVENSVILLE Can_ML_Sales_Mkt_Tariff_Current.FH10 - Aug 23, 2011 - Willis - TC Mapping ANR Pipeline Richmond n Natural Pipeline Topeka ILLINOIS Boundary Lake Gordondale Alberta-BC Empress McNeill ATCO Pipelines Alberta System SMB FT-D Group 1 Points Monchy Alberta System - Current Map sG as ALBERTA FOOTHILLS PIPE LINES LTD. Foothills System 2011 FOOTHILLS ALBERTA ZONE 6 SASKATCHEWAN FOOTHILLS ALBERTA ROCKY MOUNTAINZONE 7 BASIN BRITISH McNeill FOOTHILLS COLUMBIA SASKATCHEWAN ZONE 9 FOOTHILLS BRITISH COLUMBIA ZONE 8 Alberta/BC Monchy 1 Kingsgate Sa MONTANA WASH. NORTHERN GREATFoothills PLAINS Pipe Lines Ltd. IDAHO Interconnect Point A A K Y E E W V I I N R TransGas Centra Gas CentraN Gas Holding Inc. Union Gas Nipigon Union Gas I P E Saskatoon E C SSDA SSDA G MDA WDA WDA NDA N EmpressSuffield E R Liebenthal SASKATCHEWAN Centra W Shackleton A RichmondBayhurst MDA Tunis Power L Western T BURSTALL Success ONTARIO S 2 Herbert Northern CABRI NDA 5 Zone HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee 9 CARON MANITOBA Zone Canadian Mainline 13 Welwyn TransCanada Canadian Mainline 391 REGINA Power Plant Saskatchewan/Manitoba Restructuring Proposal 17 GRENFELL Border SmB Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN 2011 Moose Welwyn 25 RAPID CITY Calstock NEW 392 Regina HEARST CALSTOCK Gros Cacouna Jaw KLOTZLAKE MATTICE 30 GERALDTON 86 88 KAPUSKASING PORTAGE 84 92 LA PRAIRIE VERMILION BAY JELLICOE80 GazMetro BRUN 34 KENORA 95 WILLISTON Moosomin 52 DRYDEN 77 393 Winnipeg ILE DES CHENES FALCON LAKE 49 Hearst Cochrane BASIN SPRUCE45 55 Kapuskasing Tunis PowerNDA Plant 41 43 IGNACE 394 Brandon 58 NIPIGON MARTIN Kapuskasing 99 GMi Dryden EAGLEHEAD Iroquois Kenora 60 75 Power Plant Monchy CANADA UPSALA 69 Nipigon Power Plant 102 Falls 1 62 TQM Larslan Spruce Union Québec City Nipigon 105 EDA 2 U.S.A. POTTER Saskatchewan 1 Emerson #1 Emerson #2 68 107 EDA NORTHERN 3 Enbridge TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline Zone RAMORE GREAT PLAINS (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK FALLS Union Gas 110 QUEBEC EDA LACHENAIE Manitoba ST. VINCENT 2 MAINE 4 THUNDERBAY SWASTIKA Eastern Trois-Rivières Watford City SSMDA LES CEDRES Zone Great Lakes Gas Transmission 112 St. Genevieve Zone Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline O R STITTSVILLE NORTH S U P E R I CORNWALL Montréal 3 L A K E Temiscaming 5 HAILEYBURY North Bay DAKOTA 116 DEUX RIVIERES 148 East Hereford 4 1206 CANDIAC802 Sudbury JunctionNorth Bay MONTANA North Bay 147 Augusta 6 THIEF RIVER FALLS MARTEN RIVER North 1217Ottawa SHEVLIN Power Plant Philipsburg Bismarck Bay PNGTS 5 Sault Ste. Marie Napierville Pipeline 7 MINNESOTA NORTH BAY PEMBROKE 1211 6 Cornwall N 7 10 SUNDRIDGE Gas iagara 119 Waddington Transm DEER RIVER 10A G IROQUOIS1401 Westbrook E Iroquois ission Northern Border Pipeline Company Viking Gas Transmission 8 9 O Huntsville 8 Carlton R BROCKVILLE 144 L UnionB G Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. CLOQUET A A Bracebridge Brockville GMi Y I A BRACEBRIDGE N.H. K 123 KINGSTON POWDER RIVER E N 142 M&NE/PNGTS Joint Proposed Crystal Falls St. Vermont IRON RIVER NCDA Lawrence Facilities BREVORT H North Gas WAKEFIELD NAUBINWAY BELLEVILLE 139 EDA BASIN Gas Concord Bison Pipeline GOODMAN U Country Systems 9 Orillia Pipeline Neptun Northern Natural Pipeline 11 Bison Pipeline Deward R CROGHAN WISCONSIN O BARRIE 127 Kingston MOUNTAIN BLUE LAKE CENTRAL CHARLTONN 1 Evere RAPID RIVER Curtis Palmer CRYSTAL FALLS COLD SPRINGS S.CHESTER 15 Hydro Facilities 10 Enbridge 134 136 COBOURG KPUC VT. St. Paul RAPID RIVER BOWMANVILLE Dracut NE G BIG HORN BASIN Alliance Pipeline Empire State Castleton EXCELSIOR Toronto Boston BOYNE FALLS MAPLE 130 Power Plant CDA Toronto A R I O Little Falls MASS. 11 MICHIGAN O N T K E MARSHFIELD ANR A ATHENS Pierre Green Bay L N Parkway Union LINCOLN Union WRIGHT WEYAUWEGA A FARWELL 12 Farwell Hamilton Niagara Tennessee Gas G 12 SOUTH I REED CITY ORIENT Kirkwall Chippawa EDA Providence H CDA NEW YORK W.G.WOOLFOLK Niagara Spur Loop Hartford R.I. WYOMING C GOODWELL CNG Transmission WIND RIVER BASIN 13 I 13 National Fuel Gas Millennium DAKOTA M MICHIGAN CAPAC 1301 209 211 Tennessee Gas Dover CONN. ANR KEWASKUM WINFIELD Sarnia Texas Eastern Casper E BASIN Union Gas 1703 MICH. CONSOLIDATED Algonquin Gas Pipeline K Sioux Falls GAS CO. MUTTONVILLE Dawn Transmission Brookfield A Grand Rapids L LINCOLN Tennessee Gas St. Clair KIRKWALL ANCASTER Madison Lansing OTISVILLE E Ellisburg Ventura Milwaukee HAMILTON I EATON RAPIDS Detroit R National Fuel Gas Ramapo JANESVILLE E Southwest E New York Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC K DOUGLASTOWN A IOWA L Leidy N 14 WOODSTOCK Zone PENNSYLVANIA A NEBRASKA Vector Pipeline E ChicagoBRIDGMAN NI Source C Enbridge SWDA Columbia Gas O Trenton Wyoming Interstate NGPLSANDWICH LAGRANGE C 15 Joliet (Dawn) CNG Transmission I DEFIANCE Philadelphia Cheyenne 17 Texas Eastern T Harper ST.JOHN Des Moines 16 Union SWDA APPALACHIAN N.J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System
    Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System Keystone Pipeline System An innovative and cost-competitive solution to a growing North American demand for energy, the Keystone Pipeline System will link a reliable and stable source of Canadian crude oil with U.S. demand. Upon completion, the Keystone Pipeline System will be comprised of the 2,151- mile (3,461-kilometre) Keystone Pipeline and the proposed 1,661-mile (2,673-kilometre) Keystone Gulf Coast Expansion Project (Keystone XL). TransCanada affiliates will build and operate the Keystone Pipeline System in four phases. Keystone Pipeline (Phase I) Originating at Hardisty, Alta., Keystone Phase I transports crude oil to U.S. Midwest markets at Wood River and Patoka, Ill. Keystone Phase I began commercial operation in June 2010. The Canadian portion of Keystone Phase I involved the conversion of approximately 537 miles (864 kilometres) of existing TransCanada pipeline in Saskatchewan and Manitoba from natural gas to crude oil transmission service. Along with the construction of 16 pump stations Edmonton and approximately 232 miles (373 kilometres) of new pipeline in Canada, new facilities were also required Hardisty Alberta at the Keystone Hardisty Terminal, including: three Saskatchewan operational storage tanks, an initiating pump station, Calgary Regina Manitoba and interconnections with existing pipeline systems in the Winnipeg Ontario Hardisty area. The U.S. portion of the Keystone Pipeline included the North Dakota Helena construction of 1,084 miles (1,744 kilometres) of new, 30- Bismarck Minnesota inch diameter pipeline and 23 pump stations throughout Montana North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Missouri, and Illinois. Pierre Wisconsin Michigan South Dakota Wyoming Keystone Cushing Extension (Phase II) Iowa Chicago Measuring approximately 298 miles (480 kilometres) in Nebraska length,Ohio Keystone Phase II is an extension of Keystone Phase Lincoln Illinois Indiana I from Steele City, Neb., to Cushing, Okla.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Economic and Competitive Attributes of Oil and Natural Gas Development in Québec
    Study No. 154 November 2015 CANADIAN AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC AND ENERGY COMPETITIVE ATTRIBUTES OF OIL AND RESEARCH ATURAL AS EVELOPMENT IN UÉBEC INSTITUTE N G D Q Canadian Energy Research Institute | Relevant • Independent • Objective AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC AND COMPETITIVE ATTRIBUTES OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT IN QUÉBEC An Assessment of the Economic and Competitive Attributes of Oil and Natural Gas Development in Québec Authors: Jon Rozhon Paul Kralovic* ISBN 1-927037-38-6 Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2015 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazines and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute November 2015 Printed in Canada Front Photo Courtesy of istockphoto.com Acknowledgements: The authors of this report would like to extend their thanks and sincere gratitude to all CERI staff that provided insightful comments and essential data inputs required for the completion of this report, as well as those involved in the production, reviewing, and editing of the material, including but not limited to Allan Fogwill and Megan Murphy *Paul Kralovic is Director of Calgary-based Frontline Economics Inc. ABOUT THE CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Canadian Energy Research Institute is an independent, not-for-profit research establishment created through a partnership of industry, academia, and government in 1975. Our mission is to provide relevant, independent, objective economic research in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, academia
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit: When Transcanada Comes Knocking: Living Along The
    When TransCanada Comes Knocking: Living along the proposed Energy East pipeline path Cover Photo “Morning Mist in New Brunswick” by Jamie McCaffrey via Flickr, CC by 2.0 When TransCanada Comes Knocking: Living along the proposed Energy East pipeline path is published under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0. When TransCanada Comes Knocking: Living along the proposed Energy East pipeline path Table of Contents Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 TransCanada wants to build the Energy East pipeline on your property� What does this mean for you? ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 TransCanada says they can find a leak quickly and will respond swiftly �������������������������������������������� 6 • TransCanada land agents have presented us with an easement agreement� Do I need to sign it? ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 • Can TransCanada expropriate my land? ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7 • Does signing an easement agreement mean I support the Energy East project? ������������������������� 8 • What would be included in an easement agreement? ����������������������������������������������������������������� 8 • If the pipeline is decommissioned will it be removed from my property?
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    2002 ANNUAL REPORT 2002 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT TRANSCANADA pipe power people PERFORMANCE pipe power Backed by $20 billion of Our 38,000 kilometre A rapidly emerging player (24,000 mile) natural gas in the North American TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED premium assets, TransCanada pipeline system is one power industry, we have TransCanada Tower 450 – First Street SW Calgary Alberta T2P 5H1 (403) 920-2000 of the largest and most interests in a growing is a leading North American sophisticated in the world. portfolio of assets capable It links the rich natural of producing more than TransCanada welcomes questions from shareholders and investors. Please contact: gas resources of the 4,000 megawatts of David Moneta, Director, Investor Relations at 1 (800) 361-6522 (Canada and U.S. Mainland) energy company focused on Western Canada power. Our plants utilize Visit TransCanada’s Web site at www.transcanada.com natural gas transmission and Sedimentary Basin to a diverse range of fuels markets across Canada and are among the most and the United States. efficient on the continent. power generation. The skills and We are well positioned We also market electricity to play a key role in across Canada and the expertise of our people and our strong financial bringing northern gas northern United States to the growing North to meet the needs of position provide us with a clear advantage American marketplace. a wide range of industrial clients. in a highly competitive environment. Financial Highlights 1 Chairman’s Message 2 Letter to Shareholders 3 Management’s
    [Show full text]
  • File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies
    File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies regulated under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act Commission of the Canada Energy Regulator (Commission) Pipeline Financial Resources Requirements Update on Approval of Financial Resources Plans Background Subsection 138(1) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act (CER Act) requires pipeline companies to maintain financial resources equal to their absolute liability level. The Pipeline Financial Requirements Regulations (Regulations), which came into force on 11 July 2019, set out absolute liability limits for the non-major oil pipeline companies1 (i.e., all other oil, gas, and commodity pipeline companies). On 29 March 2019, the National Energy Board (NEB) issued the Pipeline Financial Requirements Guidelines (Guidelines). Included in the Guidelines was a schedule for companies to submit their financial resources plans for review and approval. By 16 April 2019, the first Financial Resources Plans from companies with an absolute liability class of Oil Class 2 and 3 were filed with the NEB for review. This was followed by companies with an absolute liability class of Gas Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 filing their Financial Resources Plans. Companies with an absolute liability class of Other Commodity filed their Financial Resources Plans by 11 June 2019. Companies whose Financial Resources Plans were previously approved are listed in Appendix I under the headings “Approved as of” for the following dates: 17 July 2019, 28 August 2019, 18 December 2019, and 3 June 2020. The Commission continues to consider the Financial Resources Plans from Oil, Gas, and Other Commodity companies filed to-date. This letter updates and replaces the Commission’s previous letter dated 3 June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline Projects with Length Greater Than 20 Miles
    12/29/2015 Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Pipeline projects with DEC-29-2015 Pipeline and Processing Facilities : SAVED REPORTS Length Greater than 1:37 PM 20 Miles Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Holding Company or Parent Operating Company: Project Status Project Project Name: Length Organization: Type: (New Miles) AK (6 Pipeline projects) Energia Cura Fairbanks Pipeline Doubtful New Arctic Fox (Fairbanks Pipeline) 443 Company Linc Energy Linc Energy On New Umiat Oil Field Pipeline 80 Hold/Postponed Alaska Housing Finance Alaska Gasline On New Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline (ASAP) 737 Corporation Development Hold/Postponed Corporation BP BP Under New Point Thomson Gas Field 22 Construction NovaGold Resources Inc. Donlin Gold, LLC Advanced New Donlin Gold 312 Development Alaska LNG Early New Alaska LNG (AKLNG) 800 Development TOT 2,394 AL (6 Pipeline projects) Southern Company Alabama Power Under New Gaston Natural Gas Pipeline 30 Construction Spectra Energy Spectra Energy Advanced New Sabal Trail 515 Development Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 1 20 Pipeline Company LLC Development Miller Energy Resources Early New Trans - Foreland Pipeline (TFPL) system 23 Development Laclede Gas Alagasco On-going Replacement Alagasco Pipeline replacement program 850 PRP Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 2 and 3 24 Pipeline Company LLC Development TOT 1,462 Alberta (43 Pipeline projects) TransCanada Imperial Oil Early New Mackenzie Gas Project 758 Development Enbridge Inc. Enbridge Income Fund Advanced New Northern Gateway Pipeline (westward 731 Development crude for export) TransCanada TransCanada Advanced New Keystone XL 1,661 Development Enhance Energy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Energy Research Institute
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System SUMMARY REPORT – VOLUME 2 Peter H. Howard P.Eng David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic Study No. 113 – Summary Report Volume 2 ISBN No. 1-896091-81-4 Purchased by the State of Alaska January 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective CAPACITY OF THE WESTERN CANADA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT VOLUME 2 ii Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2008 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazine and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-896091-81-4 Authors: Peter Howard David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE #150, 3512 – 33 STREET NW CALGARY, ALBERTA CANADA T2L A6 TELEPHONE: (403) 282-1231 January 2008 Printed in Canada January 2008 Canadian Energy Research Institute iii The Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) is a cooperative research organization established by government and industry parties in 1975. Our mission is to produce relevant, independent, objective economic research and education in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, and the public. The sponsors of the Institute are Natural Resources Canada; the Alberta Department of Energy; the Private Sector Sponsors of the Canadian Energy Research Institute (composed of more than one hundred corporate members from the energy production, transportation, marketing, distribution, and consuming sectors in Canada and abroad and the financial community); the University of Calgary; the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board; the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines; the Northwest Territories Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Alberta Research Council; and the Alberta Utilities Consumer Advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments
    Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Updated April 1, 2015 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43787 Keystone XL Pipeline: Overview and Recent Developments Summary TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for further delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day. Because it would cross the Canadian-U.S. border, Keystone XL requires a Presidential Permit from the State Department based on a determination that the pipeline would “serve the national interest.” To make its national interest determination (NID), the department considers potential effects on energy security; environmental and cultural resources; the economy; foreign policy, and other factors. Effects on environmental and cultural resources are determined by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NID process also provides for public comment and requires the State Department to consult with specific federal agencies. TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. Since then various issues have affected the completion of both the NEPA and NID processes for the project. In particular, during the NID process for the 2008 application, concerns over environmental impacts in the Sand Hills of Nebraska led the state to enact new requirements that would change the pipeline route. Facing a 60-day decision deadline imposed by Congress, the State Department denied the 2008 permit application on the grounds that it lacked information about the new Nebraska route.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed To
    North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed to Foster Increased Gas Trade Between the United States and Canada INTRODUCTION capacity additions are projected to occur in the Midwestern and Northeastern corridors. Most of As a part of its regulatory oversight the planned capacity additions provide improved responsibilities, the Office of Natural Gas & access to western Canadian supplies; however, Petroleum Import and Export Activities several of the projects are being built to transport (Import/Export Office) performs various analytical Canadian natural gas reserves located offshore studies related to the import and export of natural Nova Scotia from Sable Island. gas. This Quarterly Focus looks at some of the planned pipeline construction projects which, if The Import/Export Office has obtained built, would increase the ability to transport information about these individual projects from additional volumes of natural gas between the various sources, including regulatory filings made United States and Canada. For the most part, these with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposed projects are being designed to increase (FERC), Department of Energy (DOE), company the importation of natural gas. A similar review of representatives and Internet Web sites, and various proposed construction projects was the subject of trade journals. The review of proposed projects the Quarterly Focus written for the Quarterly include a number of projects recently announced Report issued in the second quarter of 1996; this by the sponsoring companies which have not report merely updates the status of some of the advanced much beyond the conceptual stage in projects reviewed earlier and examines some of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Inc Annual and Special Shareholders Meeting on May 06
    THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS EDITED TRANSCRIPT ENB.TO - Enbridge Inc Annual and Special Shareholders Meeting EVENT DATE/TIME: MAY 06, 2015 / 5:30PM GMT THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS | www.streetevents.com | Contact Us ©2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. 'Thomson Reuters' and the Thomson Reuters logo are registered trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies. MAY 06, 2015 / 5:30PM, ENB.TO - Enbridge Inc Annual and Special Shareholders Meeting CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Tyler Robinson Enbridge, Inc. - VP, Corporate Secretary David Arledge Enbridge, Inc. - Chairman Al Monaco Enbridge, Inc. - President, CEO CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Jane Haberbusch - Shareholder Richard Adams - Shareholder Jim Warden - Shareholder Chris Johnson - Shareholder Lino Luison - Shareholder Catherine Dyer - Shareholder Deborah Poon - Shareholder Leigh Kelln - Shareholder Monica Woodward - Shareholder Mark Boyce - Shareholder Jennifer Varey - Shareholder Max Chan - Shareholder Linda Coady - Shareholder Ellen Moshraf - Shareholder Daniel Engel - Shareholder Art Roger - Shareholder Phil Manjam - Shareholder Dave Core Federally Regulated Projects - CEO, Director PRESENTATION Tyler Robinson - Enbridge, Inc. - VP, Corporate Secretary All right. If everybody could take their seats, we will get started this afternoon. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Tyler Robison. I am Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Enbridge. Every meeting at Enbridge starts with a safety moment. So, before we get started, I want to review a few safety and process matters. All emergency exits are clearly marked with lit exit signs. In an emergency, the building's alarm system will sound and unless otherwise instructed you'll be proceeding to the ground floor in an orderly manner.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Annual Report
    THE ENERGY BRIDGE 1999 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Highlights 2 Letter to Shareholders 8 Operations Review 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 31 Financial Statements and Notes 57 Supplementary Information 58 Five Year Consolidated Highlights 60 Shareholder and Investor Information BRIDGING THE GAP Enbridge bridges the gap between energy supply and the customer, providing seamless service and delivery. Enbridge is also bridging the gap from the present to an innovative and exciting energy future. As a transporter of energy, Enbridge operates, in Canada and the United States, the world’s longest crude oil and liquids pipeline system. The Company also is involved in liquids marketing and international energy projects, and has a growing involvement in the natural gas transmission and midstream businesses. As a distributor of energy, Enbridge owns and operates Canada’s largest natural gas distribution company, which provides gas to 1.5 million customers in Ontario, Quebec and New York State. Enbridge is also involved in the distribution of electricity, and provides retail energy products and services to a growing number of Canadian and United States markets. The Company employs approximately 5,500 people, primarily in Canada, the United States and Latin America. Enbridge common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ENB”, and on The NASDAQ National Market in the United States under the symbol “ENBR”. Information about Enbridge is available on the World Wide Web at www.enbridge.com. Inuvik Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Fort McMurray Edmonton Hardisty Ottawa Montreal Cornwall Casper Toronto Salt Lake City Dawn Chicago Toledo Patoka Liquids Pipelines Jose Terminal Gas Pipelines Coveñas Gas Distribution Cusiana/ Electric Power Distribution Cupiagua Gas Gathering and Processing Bogota Enbridge Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • NAESB Members
    North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 NAESB membership extends to all employees of the member company, but does not extend to other companies with which the member company may have an organizational relationship – such as partnerships, liaisons, affiliates, subsidiaries, holding companies or parent companies. Should those companies be interested in joining they would hold separate memberships. Membership is specific to the quadrant(s) and segment(s) in which the company holds membership. Should an individual wish to represent a quadrant or segment in which the company member does not hold a membership, that individual will be considered a non-member. To obtain information on membership or verify membership status, please contact the NAESB Office ([email protected]). NAESB Membership Report - Quadrant/Segment Membership Analysis Number of Members WGQ Segments TOTAL 114 End Users 15 Distributors 22 Pipelines 35 Producers 9 Services 33 RMQ Segments TOTAL 36 Retail Electric End Users/Public Agencies 17 Retail Gas Market Interests Segment 8 Retail Electric Utilities 6 Retail Electric Service Providers/Suppliers 5 WEQ Segments TOTAL 131 End Users 15 Distributors 17 Transmission 41 Generation 20 Marketers 20 None Specified 1 Independent Grid Operators/Planners 7 Technology /Services 10 Total Membership 281 Page 1 North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 Organization Seg1 Contact Retail Markets Quadrant (RMQ) Members: 1 Agility CIS s Mary Do 2 American Public Gas Association (APGA) g Donnie Sharp 3 Big Data Energy Services s J. Cade Burks, Jennifer Teel 4 California Energy Commission e Melissa Jones 5 California Public Utilities Commission e Katherine Stockton 6 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC u John Hudson 7 City of Houston e Ray Cruz 8 Dominion Energy u Brandon Stites 9 Duke Energy Corporation u Stuart Laval, David Lawrence 10 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
    [Show full text]