DOCSLIB.ORG

Vector Pipeline TM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vector Pipeline TM TM Vector Pipeline Customer Meeting October 9, 2014 Overview TM Vector Pipeline • Welcome – Pete Cianci • Vector Update – Amy Bruhn & Matt Malinowski • DTE Update – David Slater Steve Hohf • Enbridge Update – Bruce Herdman • Discussion TM Vector Pipeline Amy Bruhn Manager, Transportation Services TM Vector Pipeline Vector Update Web Site Redesign Tariff Changes NAESB Abandonment Cost Recovery Mastio Survey TM Vector Pipeline Updated Website TM Vector Pipeline Tariff Changes • Force Majeure definition changed to be consistent with FERC policy • Reservation Charge Credits for Firm Service • Procedures for Posting and Awarding Capacity • Reservation of Capacity for Potential Expansion Projects TM Vector Pipeline NAESB Version 2.1 Standards • Published April 30, 2013 but not yet approved by FERC. Possible NOPR in the Spring with Fall implementation, including changes to the gas day • Location common codes eliminated and replaced with proprietary codes • Some field name changes • Behind-the-scenes data set changes TM Vector Pipeline Gas-Electric Coordination • Gas nomination schedule changing to improve coordination of natural gas and electricity markets. • Comments in response to FERC NOPR RM14-2-000 due November 28 TM Vector Pipeline The Gas Day is Changing Current FERC Proposal NAESB Proposal 9 a.m. Gas Day Start 4 a.m. Gas Day Start Nomination Gas Flow Nomination Gas Flow Nomination Gas Flow Cycle Timely 11:30 a.m. 9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. 4:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. start of gas day Evening 6:00 p.m. 9:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. 4:00 a.m. 6:00 p.m. start of gas day ID 1 10:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. ID 2 5:00 p.m. 9:00 p.m. 10:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. 2:30 p.m. 6:00 p.m. ID 3 4:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. 10:00 p.m. ID 4 7:00 p.m. 9:00 p.m. TM Vector Pipeline Abandonment Cost Recovery • The National Energy Board (NEB) issued its Reasons for Decision (RH-2- 2008) for the Land Matters Consultation Initiative (LMCI) Stream 3 in May 2009, whereby it required regulated Group 1 and Group 2 pipelines to file for future abandonment cost recovery mechanisms. • Vector’s physical abandonment plan was filed with the NEB, reflecting estimated future abandonment costs of $4.8 million ($CAN). • Vector’s proposed abandonment cost collection and set aside mechanisms was filed with the NEB on May 31, 2013 and approved on June 5, 2014. • Future abandonment costs are to be collected from shippers commencing January 1, 2015 over a period of 40 years and placed into a trust for safekeeping. • The abandonment surcharge is proposed to be CAN $0.0004 per GJ, but is still illustrative. It will be charged similar to the ACA surcharge. Filing of abandonment surcharge to be made with NEB by December 5, 2014. TM Vector Pipeline Mastio Customer Survey • Baseline Requirements – Items a company is expected to be competent in • Conscious Differentiators – Actively drive supplier selection decisions • Latent Differentiators – Correlate highly to customer satisfaction • Low Impact – Parity with competitors is sufficient TM Vector Pipeline Baseline Needs Firm gas transportation is highly reliable. Scheduled gas volumes are accurate. Timely transmittal of invoices. Competitive pricing of service. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vector 2014 Vector 2012 Vector 2010 TM Vector Pipeline Conscious Differentiators Integrity of transportation provider. Accuracy of gas metering statements & invoices. Timely notification before initiating restrictions. Contract negotiations are handled efficiently. Historically dependable in meeting commitments. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vector 2014 Vector 2012 Vector 2010 TM Vector Pipeline Latent Differentiators Ease of doing business. Timely resolution of problems. Ease of structuring credit arrangements. Personnel respond quickly to requests. Quality of pipeline initiated communications. Direct access to ample & diverse supply. Ease of use of Vector's website. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vector 2014 Vector 2012 Vector 2010 TM Vector Pipeline Low Impact Operational information is readily available. Ease of pipelines system for nominating & reporting. Expertise of personnel. Ease of use of the QuickNom system. Straightforward capacity release system Easy to contact the right person for help. Representatives who listen well. Contract execution handled efficiently. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vector 2014 Vector 2012 Vector 2010 TM Vector Pipeline Vector vs. The Industry Firm gas transportation is highly reliable. Scheduled gas volumes are accurate. Accuracy of gas metering statements &… Competitive pricing of service. Timely notification before initiating… Contract negotiations are handled efficiently. Operational information is readily available. Ease of system for nominating & reporting. Expertise of personnel. Straightforward capacity release system Personnel respond quickly to requests. Easy to contact the right person for help. Representatives who listen well. Quality of pipeline initiated communications. Direct access to ample & diverse supply. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Vector 2014 Industry 2014 TM Vector Pipeline Survey Action Plan We continue to seek areas where we can improve: • Posting monthly calendar of planned maintenance. • Additional training for the scheduling staff • Adding a back-up for the scheduling hotline TM Vector Pipeline Matt Malinowski Manager, Market Development TM Vector Pipeline Vector Update Year in Review Operations Expansion / Open Season Near Term Opportunities Vector Pipeline Average Dth/Day 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 - Oct-04 Jan-05 TM Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 (Includes Longhaul, Shorthaul, Backhaul and and Segmentation) Backhaul Shorthaul, Longhaul, (Includes Oct-06 Deliveries Scheduled Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Canada Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 U.S. Jan-09 Apr-09 Jul-09 Long Haul Capacity Oct-09 Jan-10 Apr-10 Jul-10 Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 TM Vector Pipeline Winter 2013/14 Winter 2013/14 System Peak – 2,340 MDth January 7, 2014 Storage Wash 10 Bluewater DTE Gas APL/NBPL Rec - 1793 Rec - 547 St. Clair 195 58 22 455 Del - 1231 Guardian NIPSCO Jackson DTE Gas Consumers Del - 352 Del - 137 Del - 80 Del - 433 Del - 107 TM Vector Pipeline Operations TM Vector Pipeline 2014 Compressor Work Completed • Springville Unit #2 exchanged – Spring 2014 • Athens engine exchanged – Spring 2014 • Rebuilt exhaust stacks at Washington – Spring 2014 • Highland Compressor Assembly – September 2014 TM Vector Pipeline Washington Stacks Old vs New TM Vector Pipeline 2014 Pipeline Maintenance • Pipeline Integrity Work - 42-inch system – Competed in Canada in September – Currently occurring on U.S. 42-inch – Multiple sites for exposure and inspection – Verifying data from 2013 smart pigging TM Vector Pipeline 2014 Pipeline Maintenance TM Vector Pipeline 2014 Pipeline Maintenance TM Vector Pipeline Future Maintenance • Pipeline Integrity Work - 36-inch system – Scheduled for Nov. 10-14 – 5 to 8 sites for exposure and inspection – Verifying data from 2013 smart pigging – Reduced pressure required – Will impact firm! TM Vector Pipeline Future Maintenance • Springville Unit #1 – replace entire control system – Scheduled for November 2014 (2-3 weeks) – Older equipment no longer OEM supported – Eventually impacts all Springville and Highland engines – Also replacing engine due to runtime TM Vector Pipeline 2015 Proposed Work • Additional electronic upgrades throughout the system due to older equipment being obsolete • New SCADA system • Continue engine exchanges and other preventative maintenance • No impacts to Firm expected TM Vector Pipeline New Facilities TM Vector Pipeline Potential Interconnects • Greenfield South – New delivery in Ontario for a 300MW Power Plant – Commercial In-Service 2015 • Chicago Markets - 2015 – Provides direct access to large LDC market TM Vector Pipeline 2017 Expansion Vector TM Vector Pipeline Expansion Capabilities • Short Haul Lake Huron WISCONSIN MICHIGAN • Scalable Incremental Capacity • Lease Line Loop • Potential Compression Lake Michigan Washington ONTARIO Highland Dawn (Union) Detroit Chicago Athens Lake Erie Joliet Springville TM Vector Pipeline 2017 Expansion • Will physically expand the east side of Vector in a scalable project – Up to 54 miles of 42-inch loop between Milford Junction and Belle River – Potentially adding compression at Washington and Belle River – Other station upgrades as needed • Vector has a PA with Nexus and is working with ET Rover to be anchor shippers for a 2017 Expansion TM Vector Pipeline 2017 Expansion • New supply of 1.3 to 2.1 Bcf/d • Expiring Capacity on Vector will be reserved for this project: Date Capacity Available (Dth/d) Dec 14 – Mar 15 68,885 Apr 15 – Oct 15 78,885 Nov 15 75,885 Dec 15 – Mar 16 435,885 Apr 16 – Oct 16 431,028 Nov 16 456,600 Dec 16 – Mar 17 541,600 Apr 17 – Oct 17 566,028 Nov 17 capacity will be reserved for Nov 17 859,347 expansion TM Vector Pipeline Open Season • Currently conducting a Binding Open Season for capacity for November 2017 • All conforming bids will be considered including new supply receipts to Dawn, Joliet to Dawn and backhauls • Bids are due Tuesday, November 4th, 2014 by 4 p.m. ECT TM Vector Pipeline Timeline • Fall 2014 – Initiate Engineering and Environmental Field Surveys • Winter 2014 – Conduct Open Houses, Agency and Stakeholder Outreach • Winter 2014 – Begin FERC/NEPA Pre-filing process • Summer 2015 – FERC 7(c) Application • Spring 2016 – FERC issues EA or EIS • Fall 2016 – FERC issues certificate • Winter 2016 – Initiate Construction Clearing • Spring 2017 – Commence Construction • November 2017 – Target In-Service Date TM Vector Pipeline Available Capacity TM Vector Pipeline Capacity • 68,885 Dth/d available Dec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies
    File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies regulated under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act Commission of the Canada Energy Regulator (Commission) Pipeline Financial Resources Requirements Update on Approval of Financial Resources Plans Background Subsection 138(1) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act (CER Act) requires pipeline companies to maintain financial resources equal to their absolute liability level. The Pipeline Financial Requirements Regulations (Regulations), which came into force on 11 July 2019, set out absolute liability limits for the non-major oil pipeline companies1 (i.e., all other oil, gas, and commodity pipeline companies). On 29 March 2019, the National Energy Board (NEB) issued the Pipeline Financial Requirements Guidelines (Guidelines). Included in the Guidelines was a schedule for companies to submit their financial resources plans for review and approval. By 16 April 2019, the first Financial Resources Plans from companies with an absolute liability class of Oil Class 2 and 3 were filed with the NEB for review. This was followed by companies with an absolute liability class of Gas Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 filing their Financial Resources Plans. Companies with an absolute liability class of Other Commodity filed their Financial Resources Plans by 11 June 2019. Companies whose Financial Resources Plans were previously approved are listed in Appendix I under the headings “Approved as of” for the following dates: 17 July 2019, 28 August 2019, 18 December 2019, and 3 June 2020. The Commission continues to consider the Financial Resources Plans from Oil, Gas, and Other Commodity companies filed to-date. This letter updates and replaces the Commission’s previous letter dated 3 June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline Projects with Length Greater Than 20 Miles
    12/29/2015 Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Pipeline projects with DEC-29-2015 Pipeline and Processing Facilities : SAVED REPORTS Length Greater than 1:37 PM 20 Miles Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Holding Company or Parent Operating Company: Project Status Project Project Name: Length Organization: Type: (New Miles) AK (6 Pipeline projects) Energia Cura Fairbanks Pipeline Doubtful New Arctic Fox (Fairbanks Pipeline) 443 Company Linc Energy Linc Energy On New Umiat Oil Field Pipeline 80 Hold/Postponed Alaska Housing Finance Alaska Gasline On New Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline (ASAP) 737 Corporation Development Hold/Postponed Corporation BP BP Under New Point Thomson Gas Field 22 Construction NovaGold Resources Inc. Donlin Gold, LLC Advanced New Donlin Gold 312 Development Alaska LNG Early New Alaska LNG (AKLNG) 800 Development TOT 2,394 AL (6 Pipeline projects) Southern Company Alabama Power Under New Gaston Natural Gas Pipeline 30 Construction Spectra Energy Spectra Energy Advanced New Sabal Trail 515 Development Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 1 20 Pipeline Company LLC Development Miller Energy Resources Early New Trans - Foreland Pipeline (TFPL) system 23 Development Laclede Gas Alagasco On-going Replacement Alagasco Pipeline replacement program 850 PRP Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 2 and 3 24 Pipeline Company LLC Development TOT 1,462 Alberta (43 Pipeline projects) TransCanada Imperial Oil Early New Mackenzie Gas Project 758 Development Enbridge Inc. Enbridge Income Fund Advanced New Northern Gateway Pipeline (westward 731 Development crude for export) TransCanada TransCanada Advanced New Keystone XL 1,661 Development Enhance Energy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Energy Research Institute
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System SUMMARY REPORT – VOLUME 2 Peter H. Howard P.Eng David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic Study No. 113 – Summary Report Volume 2 ISBN No. 1-896091-81-4 Purchased by the State of Alaska January 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective CAPACITY OF THE WESTERN CANADA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT VOLUME 2 ii Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2008 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazine and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-896091-81-4 Authors: Peter Howard David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE #150, 3512 – 33 STREET NW CALGARY, ALBERTA CANADA T2L A6 TELEPHONE: (403) 282-1231 January 2008 Printed in Canada January 2008 Canadian Energy Research Institute iii The Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) is a cooperative research organization established by government and industry parties in 1975. Our mission is to produce relevant, independent, objective economic research and education in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, and the public. The sponsors of the Institute are Natural Resources Canada; the Alberta Department of Energy; the Private Sector Sponsors of the Canadian Energy Research Institute (composed of more than one hundred corporate members from the energy production, transportation, marketing, distribution, and consuming sectors in Canada and abroad and the financial community); the University of Calgary; the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board; the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines; the Northwest Territories Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Alberta Research Council; and the Alberta Utilities Consumer Advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed To
    North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade * North American Gas Trade QUARTERLY FOCUS: Planned Pipeline Construction Designed to Foster Increased Gas Trade Between the United States and Canada INTRODUCTION capacity additions are projected to occur in the Midwestern and Northeastern corridors. Most of As a part of its regulatory oversight the planned capacity additions provide improved responsibilities, the Office of Natural Gas & access to western Canadian supplies; however, Petroleum Import and Export Activities several of the projects are being built to transport (Import/Export Office) performs various analytical Canadian natural gas reserves located offshore studies related to the import and export of natural Nova Scotia from Sable Island. gas. This Quarterly Focus looks at some of the planned pipeline construction projects which, if The Import/Export Office has obtained built, would increase the ability to transport information about these individual projects from additional volumes of natural gas between the various sources, including regulatory filings made United States and Canada. For the most part, these with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposed projects are being designed to increase (FERC), Department of Energy (DOE), company the importation of natural gas. A similar review of representatives and Internet Web sites, and various proposed construction projects was the subject of trade journals. The review of proposed projects the Quarterly Focus written for the Quarterly include a number of projects recently announced Report issued in the second quarter of 1996; this by the sponsoring companies which have not report merely updates the status of some of the advanced much beyond the conceptual stage in projects reviewed earlier and examines some of development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Annual Report
    THE ENERGY BRIDGE 1999 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Highlights 2 Letter to Shareholders 8 Operations Review 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 31 Financial Statements and Notes 57 Supplementary Information 58 Five Year Consolidated Highlights 60 Shareholder and Investor Information BRIDGING THE GAP Enbridge bridges the gap between energy supply and the customer, providing seamless service and delivery. Enbridge is also bridging the gap from the present to an innovative and exciting energy future. As a transporter of energy, Enbridge operates, in Canada and the United States, the world’s longest crude oil and liquids pipeline system. The Company also is involved in liquids marketing and international energy projects, and has a growing involvement in the natural gas transmission and midstream businesses. As a distributor of energy, Enbridge owns and operates Canada’s largest natural gas distribution company, which provides gas to 1.5 million customers in Ontario, Quebec and New York State. Enbridge is also involved in the distribution of electricity, and provides retail energy products and services to a growing number of Canadian and United States markets. The Company employs approximately 5,500 people, primarily in Canada, the United States and Latin America. Enbridge common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “ENB”, and on The NASDAQ National Market in the United States under the symbol “ENBR”. Information about Enbridge is available on the World Wide Web at www.enbridge.com. Inuvik Norman Wells Zama Fort St. John Fort McMurray Edmonton Hardisty Ottawa Montreal Cornwall Casper Toronto Salt Lake City Dawn Chicago Toledo Patoka Liquids Pipelines Jose Terminal Gas Pipelines Coveñas Gas Distribution Cusiana/ Electric Power Distribution Cupiagua Gas Gathering and Processing Bogota Enbridge Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • NAESB Members
    North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 NAESB membership extends to all employees of the member company, but does not extend to other companies with which the member company may have an organizational relationship – such as partnerships, liaisons, affiliates, subsidiaries, holding companies or parent companies. Should those companies be interested in joining they would hold separate memberships. Membership is specific to the quadrant(s) and segment(s) in which the company holds membership. Should an individual wish to represent a quadrant or segment in which the company member does not hold a membership, that individual will be considered a non-member. To obtain information on membership or verify membership status, please contact the NAESB Office ([email protected]). NAESB Membership Report - Quadrant/Segment Membership Analysis Number of Members WGQ Segments TOTAL 114 End Users 15 Distributors 22 Pipelines 35 Producers 9 Services 33 RMQ Segments TOTAL 36 Retail Electric End Users/Public Agencies 17 Retail Gas Market Interests Segment 8 Retail Electric Utilities 6 Retail Electric Service Providers/Suppliers 5 WEQ Segments TOTAL 131 End Users 15 Distributors 17 Transmission 41 Generation 20 Marketers 20 None Specified 1 Independent Grid Operators/Planners 7 Technology /Services 10 Total Membership 281 Page 1 North American Energy Standards Board Membership List As of July 31, 2021 Organization Seg1 Contact Retail Markets Quadrant (RMQ) Members: 1 Agility CIS s Mary Do 2 American Public Gas Association (APGA) g Donnie Sharp 3 Big Data Energy Services s J. Cade Burks, Jennifer Teel 4 California Energy Commission e Melissa Jones 5 California Public Utilities Commission e Katherine Stockton 6 CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC u John Hudson 7 City of Houston e Ray Cruz 8 Dominion Energy u Brandon Stites 9 Duke Energy Corporation u Stuart Laval, David Lawrence 10 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge Profile
    Out on the Tar Sands Mainline Mapping Enbridge’s Web of Pipelines A Corporate Profile of Pipeline Company Enbridge By Richard Girard, Polaris Institute Research Coordinator with Contributions from Tanya Roberts Davis Out on the Tar Sands Mainline: Mapping Enbridge’s Dirty Web of Pipelines May 2010 (partially updated, March 2012). The Polaris Institute The Polaris Institute is a public interest research and advocacy organization based in Canada. Since 1999 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies for civic action on major public policy issues, including energy security, water rights and free trade. Polaris Institute 180 Metcalf Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone : 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org For more information on the Polaris Institute’s energy campaign please visit www.tarsandswatch.org Table of Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 1. Organizational Profile ...................................................................................................5 1.1 Enbridge’s Business Structure ....................................................................................5 1.1.1 Liquids
    [Show full text]
  • Transporting Natural Gas
    About U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines – Transporting Natural Gas The U.S. natural gas pipeline network is a highly U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network integrated transmission and distribution grid that can transport natural gas to and from nearly any location in the lower 48 States. The natural gas pipeline grid comprises: • More than 210 natural gas pipeline systems. • 300,000 miles of interstate and intrastate transmission pipelines (see mileage table). • More than 1,400 compressor stations that maintain pressure on the natural gas pipeline network and assure continuous forward movement of supplies (see map). • More than 11,000 delivery points, 5,000 click to enlarge receipt points, and 1,400 interconnection See Appendix A: Combined ‘Natural Gas points that provide for the transfer of natural Transportation’ maps gas throughout the United States. • 29 hubs or market centers that provide See Appendix B: Tables additional interconnections (see map). • 394 underground natural gas storage facilities (see map). Geographic Coverage of Pipeline Companies • 55 locations where natural gas can be United States - links to companies listed A-Z with U.S. map imported/exported via pipelines (see map). showing regional breakout detail • 5 LNG (liquefied natural gas) import facilities and 100 LNG peaking facilities. Northeast - CT, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV Learn more about the natural gas Midwest - IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI Southeast - AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN pipeline network: Southwest - AR, LA, NM, OK, TX Central - CO, IA, KS,
    [Show full text]
  • Enbridge's Energy Infrastructure Assets
    Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Assets Last Updated: Aug. 4, 2021 Energy Infrastructure Assets Table of Contents Crude Oil and Liquids Pipelines .................................................................................................... 3 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines ........................................................................................... 64 Natural Gas Gathering Pipelines ................................................................................................ 86 Gas Processing Plants ................................................................................................................ 91 Natural Gas Distribution .............................................................................................................. 93 Crude Oil Tank Terminals ........................................................................................................... 96 Natural Gas Liquids Pipelines ................................................................................................... 110 NGL Fractionation ..................................................................................................................... 111 Natural Gas Storage ................................................................................................................. 112 NGL Storage ............................................................................................................................. 119 LNG Storage ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency
    Pipeline Association for Public Awareness Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency . Adelphia Gateway, LLC (800) 747-3375 Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Facilities Scott Aharonian (610) 327-5331 [email protected] ADM (563) 242-1121 Natural Gas Pipeline and Ethanol Production Facilities Kevin Duffy (563) 241-4615 [email protected] AE2S Water Solutions (218) 791-7372 Produced Water & Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Facilities Tomas Solc (763) 463-5036 [email protected] Aera Energy, LLC (800) 247-5977 Hazardous Liquids and Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities Jeff Gurican (661) 665-5103 [email protected] Aka Energy Group, LLC (970) 737-2601 Natural Gas Gathering and Transmission Facilities Angie Huber (970) 764-6480 [email protected] Alliance Pipeline L.P. (800) 884-8811 Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines Kevin Jenkins (713) 627-5986 [email protected] Alliant Energy - IPL (319) 365-8040 Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Facilities Lisa Howard (319) 786-7101 [email protected] Alliant Energy - WPL (800) 758-1576 Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Facilities Lisa Howard (319) 786-7101 [email protected] Ameren Illinois DTSC Member State: All States 9/26/2021 County: All Counties Page 1 of 42 Pipeline Association for Public Awareness Pipeline Member Companies Company Emergency . Amplify Energy Corp. (307) 328-2348 Oil and CO2 Processing Facilities Gust Hatanelas (307) 392-2363 [email protected] Arrow Pipeline, LLC (866) 234-7473 Natural Gas and Petroleum Liquids Pipeline
    [Show full text]
  • Transcanada Pipelines Limited
    TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED BUSINESS AND SERVICES RESTRUCTURING AND MAINLINE 2012 – 2013 TOLLS APPLICATION PART B: BACKGROUND Appendix B1: Maps of the TransCanada Pipeline Systems SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 A A K Y E E W V I I N R TransGas Centra Gas CentraN Gas Holding Inc. Union Gas Nipigon Union Gas I P E Saskatoon E C SSDA SSDA G MDA WDA WDA NDA N EmpressSuffield E R Liebenthal SASKATCHEWAN Centra W Shackleton A RichmondBayhurst MDA Tunis Power L Western T BURSTALL Success ONTARIO S 2 Herbert Northern CABRI NDA 5 Zone HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee 9 CARON MANITOBA Zone 13 Welwyn TransCanada Canadian Mainline Mainline Current Map 391 REGINA Power Plant 17 GRENFELL Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Moose Welwyn 25 RAPID CITY Calstock NEW 392 Regina HEARST CALSTOCK Gros Cacouna Jaw KLOTZLAKE MATTICE 30 GERALDTON 86 88 KAPUSKASING PORTAGE 84 92 LA PRAIRIE VERMILION BAY JELLICOE80 GazMetro BRUN 34 KENORA 95 WILLISTON Moosomin 52 DRYDEN 77 393 Winnipeg ILE DES CHENES FALCON LAKE 49 Hearst Cochrane Northern BASIN SPRUCE 55 NDA 41 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing Tunis Power Plant Eastern Brandon 43 394 58 NIPIGON Zone MARTIN Kapuskasing 99 Kenora Dryden EAGLEHEAD Iroquois 60 75 Power Plant 102 Zone Monchy CANADA UPSALA 69 Nipigon Power Plant Falls GMi 1 Spruce 62 Larslan Nipigon 105 Union Québec City EDA 2 U.S.A. POTTER Saskatchewan 1 Emerson #1 Emerson #2 68 107 EDA NORTHERN 3 Enbridge TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline Zone RAMORE GREAT PLAINS (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK FALLS EDA LACHENAIE 110 QUEBEC MAINE Manitoba ST. VINCENT 2 Union Gas 4 THUNDERBAY SWASTIKA Eastern Trois-Rivières Saskatchewan Watford City LES CEDRES Zone Manitoba Great Lakes Gas Transmission SSMDA 112 St.
    [Show full text]
  • File OF-AF-ACE 01 19 December 2018 To: Group 2 Pipeline
    File OF-AF-ACE 01 19 December 2018 To: Group 2 Pipeline Companies Review of Abandonment Cost Estimates (ACE) for Group 2 Pipeline Companies (Group 2 ACE Review) On 8 June 2018, the National Energy Board (NEB or Board) issued a letter to all Group 2 pipeline companies informing them that the Board would commence its review of their ACE. The Board directed all Group 2 pipeline companies to file for approval by noon, 20 July 2018: • a copy of the last approved ACE (blacklined to show changes) and a clean copy of the updated ACE for approval, using the tables and instructions provided in the attached Appendix III; or • the information found in Appendix II of the 8 June 2018 letter which the Board would use to determine the ACE amounts. On 6 November 2018, the Board issued a letter to Group 2 Pipeline Companies that had not filed an updated ACE. The companies identified in the letter were to file their ACE by 20 November 2018. Board Assessment of Group 2 pipeline companies’ ACE The Board has considered the ACE filings that were filed in response to the Board’s 8 June 2018 letter, and has separated them into three categories: Category A, Category B and Category C. Category A For those Group 2 pipeline companies listed in Category A, the Board is satisfied with the cost estimates as filed, at this time. A list of those Group 2 pipeline companies in Category A is found in Appendix I. The Board does not require anything further from these Group 2 companies with respect to this Group 2 ACE Review proceeding.
    [Show full text]