DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Mainline Sales and Marketing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Mainline Sales and Marketing Fort McMurray MANITOBA NGTL J A M SASKATCHEWAN ONTARIO E Canadian Mainline S B L Sales and Marketing A K A E Y W I N N R I E TransGas Centra P Union Nipigon V E I G R Saskatoon Calstock E EmpressSuffield SSDA SSDA Centrat MDA WDA WDA Union C N Liebenthal Centram NDA E Shackleton NDA R Richmond W Bayhurst A BURSTALL MDA QUEBEC L Success 2 Herbert T CABRI Tunis Power S 5 HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee 9 CARON elwyn NDA 13 W 391 REGINA TransCanada Canadian Mainline GRENFELL dicine 17 AY OCK ING t Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Moose RAPID CITY CALST TTICE NEW 392 Welwyn 25 HEARST Jaw Regina RTAGE KLOTZLAKE MA PUSKAS Gros Cacouna 30 RMILION B GERALDTON 88 PO E 86 KA P. E . LA PRAIRIE V JELLICOE 84 92 BRUNSWICK KENORA 80 95 34 DRYDEN 393 Moosomin ALCON LAKE 52 77 ILE DES CHENES F 49 Hearst Cochrane Winnipeg SPRUCE 55 41 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing GMIT NDA 394 Brandon 43 NIPIGON 58 MARTIN 99 Dryden EAGLEHEAD Kenora 75 Iroquois CANADA 60 UPSALA 102 GMIT EDA 1 69 Falls Spruce 62 Larslan Nipigon 105 Union Québec City 2 U.S.A. Fredericton 1 68 POTTER Saint John 3 Emerson #1 Emerson #2 107 EDA Enbridge RAMORE TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK FALLS 110 EDA LACHENAIE MAINE 4 ST. VINCENT 2 Union Watford City THUNDERBAY SWASTIKA LES CEDRES Trois-Rivières Great Lakes Gas Transmission 112 St. Genevieve NOVA SCOTIA SSMDA Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline I O R ST CORNW E S U P E R Lachenaie 3 L A K ITTSVILLE 5 HAILEYBURY Temiscaming DEUX RIVIERES 148 East Hereford RIVER FALLS 4 116 1206 ALL Montréal Sudbury AY MONTANA 6 North Bay 147 Augusta THIEF MARTEN RIVER North 1217Ottawa SHEVLIN Phili Bismarck NORTH 5 Sault Ste. Marie RTH B Bay tem NO VT. 7 PEMBROKE 1211 Napierville DAKOTA MINNESOTA p 6 Cornwall Niagara Gas 7 10 802 sburg 119 SUNDRIDGE Waddington Transmis CANDIAC PNGTS DEER RIVER IROQUOIS1401 10A G Iroquois Westbrook Northern Border Pipeline Company Viking Gas Carlton 8 E Huntsville sion 8 9 O BROCKVILLE 144 R Transmission CLOQUET WAY L UnionB Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. A A G BRACEBRIDGE Brockville N.H. K Y I A KINGSTON Crystal Falls 123 142 St. M&NE/PNGTS Joint E N Bracebridge North Vermont IRON RIVER Lawrence Facilities NAUBIN BREVORT NCDA BELLEVILLE Country Gas WAKEFIELD H 139 Gas Concord FALLS GOODMAN Pipeline Systems 9 L U Orillia CROGHAN Northern Natural Pipeline 11 Bison Pipeline Deward R WISCONSIN BOYNE FALLS O BARRIE 127 YSTA BLUE LAKE CENTRAL CHARLTON 1 Kingston MOUNTAINRAPID RIVER N KPUC EDA 10 CR COLD SPRINGS S.CHESTER 15 134 136 COBOURG St. Paul RAPID RIVER Enbridge BOWMANVILLE Dracut Alliance Pipeline Empire StateUnion EDA EXCELSIOR MAPLE 130 Boston Toronto R I O Little Falls MASS. 11 MICHIGAN CDA N TA Green Bay O ANR N WELL K E R A Pierre MARSHFIELD A Union Parkway Belt L Enbridge Parkway CDA FA WYOMING WEYAUWEGA G LINCOLN Niagara WRIGHT ennessee Gas I Farwell T 12 12 Hamilton ATHENS SOUTH H REED CITY ORIENT Union Niagara Spur Loop Providence C Kirkwall CNG Transmission NEW YORK I W.G.WOOLFOLK Algonquin Gas R.I. GOODWELL OTISVILLE National Fuel Gas Transmission Hartford 13 M 13 CDA Tennessee Gas Millen DAKOTA CAPAC Chippawa Texas Eastern Dover CONN. E nium ANR KEWASKUM WINFIELD 1301 211 Casper K Sarnia Union Gas 209 1703 MICH Pipeline A GAS Sioux Falls . CONSOLID Brookfield L MUTTONVILLE Grand Rapids CO. Dawn WALL TOWN Tennessee Gas St. Clair LINCOLN Ramapo AT Madison Lansing ED I EKIRK Milwaukee ANCASTER Ellisburg Ventura HAMILTON EATON RAPIDS R Detroit E National Fuel Gas JANESVILLE E N Kinder Morgan Inte K New York A A DOUGLAS E IOWA L C Leidy O 14 WOODSTOCK PENNSYLVANIA NEBRASKA Vector Pipeline msutter rstate Gas T ChicagoBRIDGMAN I C T ransmission LLC L Trenton N Wyoming Interstate 15 NGPSANDWICH LAGRANGE A CNG Transmission n L 17 DEFIANCE Texas Easter Philadelphia Cheyenne ny T 16 ST.JOHN Des Moines 19 N.J. A 18 Union SWDA tal Gas Joliet Enbridge SWDA Omaha NGPL Harper NEW WINDSOR sion Trailblazer BIRMINGHAM (Dawn) smis runkline Gas Compa ransmissionran Dover T s T ansContinen Ga (Dawn) MD. r OHIOa T Lincoln INDIANA mbi PORTLAND CColumbiaolu Gas Annapolis ker ILLINOIS Columbus DEL. ANR Pipeline Williams SULPHUR SPRINGS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Southern LINEVILLE Washington D.C. McCook Indianapolis as Eastern Tex Denver MAITLAND Colorado Interstate Gas CompanySt Springfield W. VIRGINIA VIRGINIA ar Central Gas Pipeline Inc Midwestern Gas SHELBYVILLE REX COLORADO KANSAS HAVENSVILLE TransColorado T ransmission ANR Pipeline Richmond Northern Natural Pipeline Charleston ENTERPRISE Topeka Kansas City s CELESTINE Northwest Pipeline St. Louis Louisville sion nsmis Transmission Lynchburg as TTransmissionransmissionra Jefferson City ia G Evansville umb exas Gas ColumbiaCol Gas ALDEN T MISSOURI GREENSBURG MADISONVILLE KENTUCKY ee (ETNG) Blanco ss.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pipeline Authority Annual Report 2018
    North Dakota Pipeline Authority Annual Report July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Industrial Commission of North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, Chairman Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring North Dakota Pipeline Authority Annual Report July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Overview At the request of the North Dakota Industrial Commission, the Sixtieth Legislature passed House Bill 1128 authorizing the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. It was signed into law on April 11, 2007. The statutory mission of the Pipeline Authority is “to diversify and expand the North Dakota economy by facilitating development of pipeline facilities to support the production, transportation, and utilization of North Dakota energy-related commodities, thereby increasing employment, stimulating economic activity, augmenting sources of tax revenue, fostering economic stability and improving the State’s economy”. As established by the Legislature, the Pipeline Authority is a builder of last resort, meaning private business would have the first opportunity to invest in and/or build additional needed pipeline infrastructure. By law, the Pipeline Authority membership is comprised of the members of the North Dakota Industrial Commission. Upon the recommendation of the Oil and Gas Research Council, the Industrial Commission authorized the expenditure of up to $325,000 during the 2017-2019 biennium for the Pipeline Authority with funding being made available from the Oil and Gas Research Fund. On August 1, 2008 the Industrial Commission named Justin J. Kringstad, an engineering consultant, to serve as Director of the North Dakota Pipeline Authority. The North Dakota Pipeline Authority Director works closely with Lynn Helms, Department of Mineral Resources Director, Ron Ness, North Dakota Petroleum Council President and Karlene Fine, Industrial Commission Executive Director.
    [Show full text]
  • Management's Discussion and Analysis
    Management’s discussion and analysis February 12, 2015 This management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) contains information to help the reader make investment decisions about TransCanada PipeLines Limited. It discusses our business, operations, financial position, risks and other factors for the year ended December 31, 2014. This MD&A should be read with our accompanying December 31, 2014 audited comparative consolidated financial statements and notes for the same period, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Contents ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT ............................... 2 ABOUT OUR BUSINESS ................................. 5 • Three core businesses ................................. 5 • Our strategy ....................................... 6 • Capital program ..................................... 7 • 2014 financial highlights .............................. 8 • Outlook ........................................... 13 NATURAL GAS PIPELINES ............................... 15 LIQUIDS PIPELINES .................................... 33 ENERGY ............................................. 43 CORPORATE .......................................... 63 FINANCIAL CONDITION ................................. 65 OTHER INFORMATION ................................. 75 • Risks and risk management ............................ 75 • Controls and procedures .............................. 81 • CEO and CFO certifications ............................ 82 • Critical accounting estimates ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pipeline Transportation System Energy Market Assessment
    National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie CANADIAN PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ENERGY MARKET ASSESSMENT National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie National Energy Office national Board de l’énergieAPRIL 2014 National Energy Office national Board de l’énergie Permission to Reproduce Materials may be reproduced for personal, educational and/or non-profit activities, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the National Energy Board, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the National Energy Board is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the National Energy Board. For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial redistribution, please e-mail: [email protected] Autorisation de reproduction Le contenu de cette publication peut être reproduit à des fins personnelles, éducatives et/ou sans but lucratif, en tout ou en partie et par quelque moyen que ce soit, sans frais et sans autre permission de l’Office national de l’énergie, pourvu qu’une diligence raisonnable soit exercée afin d’assurer l’exactitude de l’information reproduite, que l’Office national de l’énergie soit mentionné comme organisme source et que la reproduction ne soit présentée ni comme une version officielle ni comme une copie ayant été faite en collaboration avec l’Office national de l’énergie ou avec son consentement.
    [Show full text]
  • TC Energy 2021 Management Information Circular
    Management information circular March 4, 2021 Notice of annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 7, 2021 24668 TC_ENGLISH Circular cover spread.pdf - p1 (March 6, 2021 00:22:29) DT Letter to shareholders ........................................... 1 Notice of 2021 annual meeting ................................ 2 About Management information circular ............................3 TC Energy Summary ....................................................................4 About the shareholder meeting ...............................6 Delivering the energy people need, every day. Safely. Delivery of meeting materials ........................................7 Responsibly. Collaboratively. With integrity. Attending and participating in the meeting .....................8 We are a vital part of everyday life — delivering the energy millions of people rely on to power their lives in a Voting ...................................................................... 10 sustainable way. Thanks to a safe, reliable network of natural gas and crude oil pipelines, along with power generation Business of the meeting .............................................. 14 and storage facilities, wherever life happens — we’re there. Guided by our core values of safety, responsibility, Governance ........................................................33 collaboration and integrity, our 7,500 people make a positive difference in the communities where we operate across About our governance practices ...................................33 Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form
    TC Energy Corporation 2019 Annual information form February 12, 2020 TED Contents PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION . 2 FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION . 2 TC ENERGY CORPORATION . 4 Corporate structure . 4 Intercorporate relationships . 4 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS . 5 Natural Gas Pipelines . 5 Liquids Pipelines . 12 Power and Storage . 14 BUSINESS OF TC ENERGY . 15 Natural Gas Pipelines . 15 Liquids Pipelines . 15 Regulation of Natural Gas Pipelines and Liquids Pipelines . 16 Power and Storage . 17 GENERAL . 18 Employees . 18 Health, safety, sustainability and environmental protection and social policies . 18 RISK FACTORS . 20 DIVIDENDS . 21 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE . 21 Share capital . 21 CREDIT RATINGS . 24 Moody's . 25 S&P . 25 Fitch . 25 DBRS . 26 MARKET FOR SECURITIES . 27 Common shares . 27 Preferred shares . 28 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS . 29 Directors . 29 Board committees . 31 Officers . 32 Conflicts of interest . 33 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . 34 AUDIT COMMITTEE . 35 Relevant education and experience of members . 35 Pre-approval policies and procedures . 37 External auditor service fees . 37 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS . 38 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR . 38 MATERIAL CONTRACTS . 38 INTEREST OF EXPERTS . 38 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . 38 GLOSSARY . 39 SCHEDULE A . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Mainline Sales and Marketing
    Fort Nelson ALBERTA H U D S O N B AY Fort St. John Canadian Mainline Gordondale Sales and Marketing Fort McMurray Grande Prairie SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA Edmonton NGTL J A M TransGas ONTARIO E S B L A K A E Y W I N N R I E TransGas Centra P Union Nipigon V E I G R Saskatoon Calstock Empress Centrat MDA E Suffield SSDA SSDA WDA WDA Union C N Foothills Pipelines Liebenthal Centram NDA E ALL R T Shackleton NDA (Alberta) Richmond W Bayhurst A BURS MDA L Alberta/B.C. Calgary Success QUEBEC 2 Herbert T CABRI Tunis Power S 5 HERBERT SteelmanGrand Coulee ng Cranbrook 9 CARON NDA 13 Welwyn 391 REGINA TransCanada Canadian Mainline GRENFELL Medicine 17 AY OCK Hat Swift Current 21 MOOSOMIN Lethbridge Moose Welwyn RAPID CITY AGE CALST Kingsgate 392 25 HEARST Jaw Regina RT KLOTZLAKE MATTICE Gros Cacouna NEW 30 GERALDTON 88 PO 86 KAPUSKASING LA PRAIRIE VERMILION B JELLICOE 84 92 P. E . I . KENORA YDEN 80 95 BRUNSWICK Foothills Pipeline B.C. 34 DR Moosomin ALCON LAKE 52 77 393 ILE DES CHENES F 49 Hearst Cochrane Winnipeg SPRUCE 55 45 IGNACE Kapuskasing Energir NDA 41 RTIN 394 Brandon 43 NIPIGON 58 MA 99 Dryden EAGLEHEAD Kenora 75 Iroquois Sa CANADA 60 UPSALA 102 Falls Energir EDA 69 ALLS 1 Spruce 62 Larslan 105 Québec City U.S.A. Nipigon Union Fredericton 2 1 POTTER Saint John Emerson #1 68 Halifax 3 Emerson #2 107 EDA Enbridge RAMORE TransQuebec & Maritimes Pipeline (Viking) (GLGT) Thunder Bay SMOOTH ROCK F 110 EDA LACHENAIE ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric/Gas Operations Committee Meeting No
    ISO New England Final Minutes Electric/Gas Operations Committee Meeting No. 65 March 25, 2020 2:00 – 2:25 PM EDT Teleconference Attendees Representing M. Babula ISO New England (ISO-NE) E. Cahill Constellation / Everett LNG J. Carroll Energir J. Daul National Fuel Gas Supply M. Dirrane Enbridge J. Esposito Iroquois Gas Transmission (IGT) C. Fasca ISO New England T. Gwilliam Iroquois Gas Transmission M. Holt NG Advantage K. Iampen Repsol / Canaport LNG E. Karanian Eversource Energy A. Klaube Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) M. Knowland ISO-NE S. Leahy Northeast Gas Association (NGA) M. Lombardi NPCC A. Oks NPCC W. Page Enbridge D. Raval Columbia Gas of MA/NiSource G. Ritter Excelerate Energy L. Reno Eversource Energy C. Sculley Tennessee Gas Pipeline (TGP) N. Sproehnle ISO New England J. Stevenson New York ISO (NYISO) G. Venkateshan Tennessee Gas Pipeline TGP) T. White Iroquois Gas Transmission M. Whitten Daymark Energy Advisors M. Zampano Sprague Energy Introductions Mr. Babula welcomed everyone to the sixty-fifth meeting of the Electric/Gas Operations Committee (EGOC). Introductions were made. This meeting’s agenda focused on identifying the current conditions for the regional electric, natural gas and liquid fuel sectors during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was the second meeting of the EGOC in a series of regularly weekly conference calls scheduled during the ongoing pandemic. ISO New England / NGA Page 1 April 10, 2020 ISO New England Final Minutes 1.0 Administrative Matters 1.1 ISO New England’s (ISO-NE) Information Policy and the Northeast Gas Association’s (NGA) Antitrust Compliance Procedure Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Mexico Canada
    4 5 93 3 8 7 CANADA 6 CALGARY TORONTO 1 UNITED STATES CHARLESTON 2 HOUSTON MEXICO MEXICO CITY TC Energy – Liquids pipelines As of June 30, 2021 Liquids pipelines We are the operator and developer of the following pipelines and properties. Length Description Ownership Liquids Pipelines Transports crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to U.S. markets at 4,324 km 1 Keystone Pipeline System Wood River and Patoka, Illinois, Cushing, Oklahoma, and the U.S. 100% (2,687 miles) Gulf Coast. Transports crude oil from Cushing, Oklahoma to the U.S. Gulf Coast on 2 Marketlink 100% facilities that form part of the Keystone Pipeline System. Transports crude oil from the producing area northwest of Fort 460 km 3 Grand Rapids McMurray, Alberta to the Edmonton/Heartland, Alberta market 50% (287 miles) region. 72 km Transports crude oil from Canadian Natural Resources Limited’s 4 White Spruce 100% (45 miles) Horizon facility in northeast Alberta to the Grand Rapids pipeline. 90 km Transports bitumen and diluent between the Fort Hills mine site and 5 Northern Courier 15% (56 miles) Suncor Energy’s terminal located north of Fort McMurray, Alberta. In development 6 Keystone Hardisty Terminal1 Crude oil terminal located at Hardisty, Alberta. 100% 200 km 7 Heartland Pipeline and Terminal and pipeline facilities to transport crude oil from the (125 miles) 100% 8 TC Terminals Edmonton/Heartland, Alberta region to Hardisty, Alberta. Expansion of Grand Rapids to transport additional crude oil from 460 km 9 Grand Rapids Phase II the producing area northwest of Fort McMurray, Alberta to the 50% (287 miles) Edmonton/Heartland, Alberta market region.
    [Show full text]
  • File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies
    File OF-GEN-06 FRR 14 August 2020 To: All Pipeline Companies regulated under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act Commission of the Canada Energy Regulator (Commission) Pipeline Financial Resources Requirements Update on Approval of Financial Resources Plans Background Subsection 138(1) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act (CER Act) requires pipeline companies to maintain financial resources equal to their absolute liability level. The Pipeline Financial Requirements Regulations (Regulations), which came into force on 11 July 2019, set out absolute liability limits for the non-major oil pipeline companies1 (i.e., all other oil, gas, and commodity pipeline companies). On 29 March 2019, the National Energy Board (NEB) issued the Pipeline Financial Requirements Guidelines (Guidelines). Included in the Guidelines was a schedule for companies to submit their financial resources plans for review and approval. By 16 April 2019, the first Financial Resources Plans from companies with an absolute liability class of Oil Class 2 and 3 were filed with the NEB for review. This was followed by companies with an absolute liability class of Gas Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 filing their Financial Resources Plans. Companies with an absolute liability class of Other Commodity filed their Financial Resources Plans by 11 June 2019. Companies whose Financial Resources Plans were previously approved are listed in Appendix I under the headings “Approved as of” for the following dates: 17 July 2019, 28 August 2019, 18 December 2019, and 3 June 2020. The Commission continues to consider the Financial Resources Plans from Oil, Gas, and Other Commodity companies filed to-date. This letter updates and replaces the Commission’s previous letter dated 3 June 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline Projects with Length Greater Than 20 Miles
    12/29/2015 Pipeline and Processing Fac... - Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Pipeline projects with DEC-29-2015 Pipeline and Processing Facilities : SAVED REPORTS Length Greater than 1:37 PM 20 Miles Pipeline projects with Length Greater than 20 Miles Holding Company or Parent Operating Company: Project Status Project Project Name: Length Organization: Type: (New Miles) AK (6 Pipeline projects) Energia Cura Fairbanks Pipeline Doubtful New Arctic Fox (Fairbanks Pipeline) 443 Company Linc Energy Linc Energy On New Umiat Oil Field Pipeline 80 Hold/Postponed Alaska Housing Finance Alaska Gasline On New Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline (ASAP) 737 Corporation Development Hold/Postponed Corporation BP BP Under New Point Thomson Gas Field 22 Construction NovaGold Resources Inc. Donlin Gold, LLC Advanced New Donlin Gold 312 Development Alaska LNG Early New Alaska LNG (AKLNG) 800 Development TOT 2,394 AL (6 Pipeline projects) Southern Company Alabama Power Under New Gaston Natural Gas Pipeline 30 Construction Spectra Energy Spectra Energy Advanced New Sabal Trail 515 Development Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 1 20 Pipeline Company LLC Development Miller Energy Resources Early New Trans - Foreland Pipeline (TFPL) system 23 Development Laclede Gas Alagasco On-going Replacement Alagasco Pipeline replacement program 850 PRP Williams Company Transcontinental Gas Early New Hillabee Expansion Project Phase 2 and 3 24 Pipeline Company LLC Development TOT 1,462 Alberta (43 Pipeline projects) TransCanada Imperial Oil Early New Mackenzie Gas Project 758 Development Enbridge Inc. Enbridge Income Fund Advanced New Northern Gateway Pipeline (westward 731 Development crude for export) TransCanada TransCanada Advanced New Keystone XL 1,661 Development Enhance Energy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Energy Research Institute
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System SUMMARY REPORT – VOLUME 2 Peter H. Howard P.Eng David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic Study No. 113 – Summary Report Volume 2 ISBN No. 1-896091-81-4 Purchased by the State of Alaska January 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective CAPACITY OF THE WESTERN CANADA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT VOLUME 2 ii Capacity of the Western Canada Natural Gas Pipeline System Copyright © Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2008 Sections of this study may be reproduced in magazine and newspapers with acknowledgement to the Canadian Energy Research Institute ISBN 1-896091-81-4 Authors: Peter Howard David McColl Dinara Millington Paul R. Kralovic CANADIAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE #150, 3512 – 33 STREET NW CALGARY, ALBERTA CANADA T2L A6 TELEPHONE: (403) 282-1231 January 2008 Printed in Canada January 2008 Canadian Energy Research Institute iii The Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI) is a cooperative research organization established by government and industry parties in 1975. Our mission is to produce relevant, independent, objective economic research and education in energy and environmental issues to benefit business, government, and the public. The sponsors of the Institute are Natural Resources Canada; the Alberta Department of Energy; the Private Sector Sponsors of the Canadian Energy Research Institute (composed of more than one hundred corporate members from the energy production, transportation, marketing, distribution, and consuming sectors in Canada and abroad and the financial community); the University of Calgary; the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board; the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines; the Northwest Territories Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development; Indian and Northern Affairs Canada; Alberta Research Council; and the Alberta Utilities Consumer Advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Principles Surrounding the New Canadian and American Arctic Energy Debate
    LEGAL PRINCIPLES SURROUNDING THE NEW CANADIAN AND AMERICAN ARCTIC ENERGY DEBATE Alexander J. Black* "The Arctic trails have their secret tales That would make your blood run cold" ' I. INTRODU~~ION Almost a quarter century ago, great plans were made by Canada and the United States to build a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the contiguous forty-eight states. However, the project stalled and has only been reinvigorated recently. This article identifies some of the unresolved legal issues surrounding the Alaska Highway gas pipeline project and competing proposals concerning connection to Canada's Mackenzie Delta. My underlying theme is security of supply, a concern that has increased in importance following the act of war by terrorists in New York City on September 11, 2001. These legal issues and business proposals should be reconciled quickly in order to ensure security of supply between Canada and the United States. Both countries share strategic mutual interests. Thus, this article presents a synthesis of the legal issues in an attempt to advance the longstanding comity between our countries through informed and timely decision making. Ultimately, a decision has to be made about the 1977 bilateral international agreement, aimed at transporting natural gas from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska through Canada to the contiguous forty-eight states. The original project was called the Foothills (or Alaska Highway) project by Canadians, while Americans often called it the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS). That acronym, ANGTS, sounds like 'angst', suggesting that some anxiety might exist about the outcome of this complicated project. Indeed this project has caused its share of angst over the past twenty-five years.
    [Show full text]