DOCSLIB.ORG

The Icon FAQ Share | 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Icon FAQ Share | 1 Sprache auswählen Powered by Übersetzen Search Site Map Contact About Photos 2ome 3 General Information 4ages''' 3 Icons Iconography General Information 4ages''' The Icon A! Share | 1" What is an Icon# Related Articles An Icon is an image %usually t5o dimensional& of Christ6 the Saints6 Angels6 important "iblical e7ents6 parables6 or e7ents in the history of the Church' Webmaster’s Picks The Iconic and Symbolic in St' Gregory the !ialogist %4ope of 8ome ca' .9:;/:-&6 spoke of Icons as being Orthodox Iconography Scripture to the illiterate: Cherubim and Arks Google Results <(or 5hat 5riting presents to readers6 this a picture presents to the unlearned 5ho behold6 since in it e7en the ignorant see 5hat they ought to follo5= in it the General Information: Icons Iconography illiterate read< %>pistle to "ishop Serenus of $arseilles6 NPNF 2, ?ol' @III6 p' .,&' The Iconic and Symbolic in Orthodox Iconography To those 5ho 5ould suggest that this is no longer rele7ant in our enlightened age6 A !iscourse in Iconography Institute for "y#antine and let them consider the rather large functional illiteracy rate 5e ha7e6 and the fact $odern Greek Studies that e7en the most literate societies al5ays ha7e a si#able illiterate segment''' their %I"$GS& :: Art ''' young children' The (unctions of Icons A )ord About *$onastery Icons* Icons also lift up our minds from earthly things to the hea7enly' St' Aohn of The !octrine of the Orthodox !amascus 5rote6 <5e are led by perceptible Icons to the contemplation of the Church: Orthodoxy in the di7ine and spiritual< %PG 9-:B+/Ba&' And by keeping their memory before us )orld through the Icons6 5e are also inspired to imitate the holiness of those therein Keywords used: iconography and icons depicted' St' Gregory of Cyssa %ca ,,:;,9.& spoke of ho5 he could not pass an Icon of Abraham sacrificing Isaac <5ithout tears< %PG -/:.0+&' Commenting on 1 + , - . / 0 1 this6 it 5as noted at the Se7enth Dcumenical Synod6 <If to such a !octor the picture 5as helpful and dre5 forth tears6 ho5 much more in the case of the ignorant and simple 5ill it bring compunction and benefit< %NPNF2, ?ol B-6 p' .,9&' or urther Reading: The (unctions of Icons6 by !r' Constantine Ca7arnos' Ch' , from Orthodox Iconography. A !iscourse in Iconography6 by St' Aohn of Shanghai and San (rancisco $" %o &rthodo' (hristians )ray to Icons# Christians pray in the presence of Icons %Eust as Israelites prayed in the presence of Icons in the Temple&6 but 5e do not pray to the image' *" %o Icons work miracles# To put this Fuestion in proper perspecti7e6 let*s consider a fe5 other Fuestions: !id the Ark of the Co7enant 5ork miracles %e'g' Aoshua ,:B.ff= Bst Samuel -;/= +nd Samuel BB;B+&G !id the "ron#e Serpent heal those bitten by snakes %Cumbers +B:9&G !id the 4rophet >lisha*s bones raise a man from the dead %+nd Hings B,:+B&G !id St' 4eter*s shado5 heal the sick %Acts .:B.&G !id aprons and handkerchiefs that had touched St' 4aul heal the sick and caste out e7il spirits %Acts B9:B+&G The ans5er to these Fuestions are6 Ies6 in a manner of speaking' Ce7ertheless6 to be precise6 it 5as God 5ho chose to 5ork miracles through these things' In the case of the Ark and the "ron#e serpent6 5e ha7e images used to 5ork miracles' God 5orked a miracle through the relics of the 4rophet >lisha6 through the shado5 of a Saint6 and through things that had merely touched a Saint' )hyG "ecause God honors those 5ho honor 2im %Bst Samuel +:,:&6 and thus takes delight in 5orking miracles through his Saints6 e7en by these indirect means' The fact that God can sanctify material things should come as no surprise to those familiar 5ith Scripture' (or example6 not only 5as the Altar of the Temple holy6 but anything that touched it 5as holy as 5ell %>xodus +9:,0&' To reEect the truth that God 5orks through material things is to fall into Gnosticism' So yes6 loosely speaking6 Icons can 5ork miraclesJbut to be precise6 it is God 5ho 5orks miracles through Icons6 because 2e honors those 5ho ha7e honored 2im' +" %o &rthodo' (hristians Worshi) Icons# What,s the di--erence between .worshi). and ./eneration.# Orthodox Christians do not 5orship Icons in the sense that the 5ord <5orship< is commonly used in modern >nglish' In older translations %and in some more recent translations in 5hich the translators insist on using this 5ord in its original sense&6 one finds the 5ord <5orship< used to translate the Greek 5ord proskyneo %literally6 <to bo5<&' Ce7ertheless6 one must understand that the older use of <5orship< in >nglish 5as much broader than it is generally used today6 and 5as often used to refer simply to the act of honoring6 7enerating6 or re7erencing' (or example6 in the old book of common prayer6 one of the 5edding 7o5s 5as <5ith my body I thee 5orship6< but this 5as ne7er intended to imply that the bride 5ould 5orship her husband in the sense in 5hich <5orship< is commonly used no5' %(or more on the use of the >nglish 5ord <5orship< as it relates to Icons6 see: <)orship<G& Orthodox Christians do venerate Icons6 5hich is to say6 5e pay respect to them because they are holy obEects6 and because 5e re7erence 5hat the Christ the Light-Giver Icons depict' )e do not 5orship Icons any more than Americans 5orship the American flag' Saluting the flag is not exactly the same type of 7eneration as 5e pay to Icons6 but it is indeed a type of 7eneration' And Eust as 5e do not 7enerate 5ood and paint6 but rather the persons depicted in the Icon6 patriotic Americans do not 7enerate cloth and dye6 but rather the country 5hich the flag represents' This 5as the reasoning of the Se7enth Dcumenical Synod6 5hich decreed in its Oros the follo5ing: <Since this is the case6 follo5ing the royal path and the teaching di7inely inspired by our holy (athers and the Tradition of the catholic ChurchJfor 5e kno5 that it is inspired by the 2oly Spirit 5ho li7es in itJ5e decide in all correctness and after a thorough examination that6 Eust as the holy and 7i7ifying Cross6 similarly the holy and precious Icons painted 5ith colors6 made 5ith little stones or 5ith any other matter ser7ing this purpose %epitedeios&6 should be placed in the holy churches of God6 on 7ases and sacred 7estments6 on 5alls and boards6 in houses and on roads6 5hether these are Icons of our Kord God and Sa7ior6 Aesus Christ6 or of our spotless So7ereign Kady6 the holy $other of God6 or of the holy angels and of holy and 7enerable men' (or each time that 5e see their representation in an image6 each time6 5hile ga#ing upon them6 5e are made to remember the prototypes6 5e gro5 to lo7e them more6 and 5e are more induced to 5orship them by kissing them and by 5itnessing our 7eneration %proskenesin&6 not the true adoration % atreian& 5hich6 according to our faith6 is proper only to the one di7ine nature6 but in the same 5ay as 5e 7enerate the image of the precious and 7i7ifying cross6 the holy Gospel and other sacred obEects 5hich 5e honor 5ith incense and candles according to the pious custom of our forefathers' (or the honor rendered to the image goes to its prototype6 and the person 5ho 7enerates an Icon 7enerates the person represented in it' Indeed6 such is the teaching of our holy (athers and the Tradition of the holy catholic Church 5hich propagated the Gospel from one end of the earth to the other'< The Ae5s understand the difference bet5een 7eneration and 5orship %adoration&' A pious Ae5 kisses the $e#u#a on his door post6 he kisses his prayer sha5l before putting it on6 he kisses the tallenin6 before he binds them to his forehead6 and arm' 2e kisses the Torah before he reads it in the Synagogue' Co doubt6 Christ did like5ise6 5hen reading the Scriptures in the Synagogue' The >arly Christians also understood this distinction as 5ell' In the $artyrdom of 4olycarp %5ho 5as St' Aohn the Apostle*s disciple6 and 5hose $artyrdom 5as recorded by the faithful of his Church6 5ho 5ere eye5itnesses of all that it recounts&6 5e are told of ho5 some sought to ha7e the 8oman magistrate keep the Christians from retrie7ing the body of the 2oly $artyr <*lest6* so it 5as said6 *they should abandon the crucified one and begin to 5orship this man*Jthis being done at the instigation and urgent entreaty of the Ae5s6 5ho also 5atched 5hen 5e 5ere about to take it from the fire6 not kno5ing that it 5ill be impossible for us either to forsake at any time the Christ 5ho suffered for the sal7ation of the 5hole 5orld of those that are sa7edJsuffered though faultless for sinnersJnor to 5orship any other' (or 2im6 being the Son of God6 5e adore6 but the martyrs as disciples and imitators of the Lord 5e cherish as they deser7e for their matchless affection to5ards their o5n Hing and Teacher'''' The centurion therefore6 seeing the opposition raised on the part of the Ae5s6 set him in the midst and burnt him after their custom' And so 5e after5ards took up his bones 5hich are more 7aluable than precious stones and finer than refined gold6 and laid them in a suitable place= 5here the Kord 5ill permit us to gather oursel7es together6 as 5e are able6 in gladness and Eoy6 and to celebrate the birth;day Li'e' the anni7ersaryM of his martyrdom for the commemoration of those that ha7e already fought in the contest6 and for the training and preparation of those that shall do so hereafter< %The $artyrdom of 4olycarp B0:+;,= B1:B;,&' or urther Reading: (or a discussion of the 2ebre5 5ords %and to some extent6 the Greek 5ords& rele7ant to this discussion6 see this excerpt from the !heo ogica "ord#ook of the O d !esta$ent' Is ?enerating Icons IdolatryG6 by Timothy Copple
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read the Essay on Mandatory Celibacy Here
    What is the most underrated event of the past, and why is it so much more significant than people understand? When the Gregorian Reform was launched at the dawn of the second millennium, the papacy’s agenda was unequivocal. In an effort to centralise power and re-establish authority, a succession of popes both before and after Gregory VII (d. 1085), the reform’s namesake, introduced changes designed to free the Church from lay control. Secular rulers were stripped of their sacerdotal functions and clerics came to be the sole representatives of the Church, rather than the laity, as simony, investiture, and nicolaitism (i.e., clerical marriage) came under attack. The most far-reaching and long-lasting repercussions of these reforms, however, yet the most overlooked by historians, was the social upheaval caused by enforced clerical celibacy and its particularly devastating effect on women. The relentless onslaughts on clerical marriage instigated a social revolution that spanned the European continent, provoking riots for centuries, and, most perniciously, demonising half the world’s population as the reformers campaigned against women in order to make marriage less appealing. Misogyny has been woven so deeply into history that its nuanced causes and effects at any given time can be difficult to discern. But an analysis of the rhetoric used by reformers to vilify clerical wives and women in general can trace the revitalised hostility towards women beginning in the High Middle Ages to these reforms. For the first thousand years of Christianity, clerical marriage was common practice. Despite various church councils promulgating the ideal of celibacy, beginning with the Synod of Elvira in the fourth century which declared that all clerics were to “abstain from conjugal relations with their wives”1, deacons, priests, bishops, and even popes continued to marry and have children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petrine Ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils
    The Petrine ministry at the time of the first four ecumenical councils: relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils Author: Pierluigi De Lucia Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1852 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2010 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. BOSTON COLLEGE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND MINISTRY WESTON JESUIT DEPARTEMENT The Petrine ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils Relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the S.T.L. Degree Of the School of Theology and Ministry By: Pierluigi De Lucia, S.J. Directed by: Francine Cardman Second Reader: Francis A. Sullivan, S.J. May 2010 © Copyright by Pierluigi DE LUCIA, S.J. 2010 Abstract The Petrine ministry of the bishops of Rome and relations with the eastern bishops at the time of the first four ecumenical councils are the focus of this thesis. It places the Church in the complex historical context marked by the public recognition of Christianity under Constantine (312) and the great novelty of the close interactions of the emperors with the bishops of the major sees in the period, Rome, Alexandria, Antioch and Constantinople. The study examines the structures of the church (local and regional synods and ecumenical councils) and the roles of bishops and emperors in the ecumenical councils of Nicaea (325), Constantinople I (381), Ephesus (431), and Chalcedon (451), including the “robber” council of 449.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Longer Canon Law Introduction Page For
    LONGER CANON LAW INTRODUCTION PAGE FOR DOWNLOADING (material taken from the CLSA commissioned The Code of Canon Law, A Text and Commentary, edited by James Coriden, Thomas Green and Donald Heintschel (Paulist Press, New York: 1985), pp. 1-22). I. The Historical Development of Law in the Church. There are basically 5 historical periods in the history of the development of law in the Church. These are as follows: 1. The Early Christian Community (1-8 centuries). The early Christian Church, at least in Jewish sectors, incorporated the laws of the Old Testament into its life and practices. In the Old Testament, there were laws, which focused on the worship of the Jewish people, laws concerned with dietary regulations, and moral laws given by God for his people. In the earliest writings of the New Testament, laws appear. St. Paul, the first writer of the New Testament, presents lists of moral and disciplinary directives to be observed by all believers. He speaks at some length on marriage, the giving of directives for the moral life, and on amending the Jewish ritual practices of the early Christians, so that Christianity would not simply remain a Jewish sect. The early Church councils made determinations that were fairly specific and localized. They sought to offer specific solutions to specific problems now being faced by the growing Church. Many early canonical decisions and legislation was made from local, regional and provincial councils, such as the Synod of Elvira (in about the year 300). After the Edict of Constantine (313), the Church began another stage of development, since it was now free to grow and expand beyond the borders of the Roman Empire, without fear of persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Laodicea in Phrygia Forbade Inferior Classes, Subdeacons, Readers, Etc., to Usurp the Orarium
    0363-0363 – Synodus Laodiciae – Documenta Omnia Synod Of Laodicea this file has been downloaded from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.html NPNF (V2-14) Philip Schaff At the end of this canon in Labbe’s version of Dionysius we find these words added. “And thirty bishops signed who were gathered together at this Synod.” Isidore Mercator has a still fuller text, viz.: “I, Eusebius, being present subscribe to all things constituted by this holy Synod. Theodore, Nicetas, Macedonius, Anatolius, Tarcodimantus, Æthereus, Narcissus, Eustachius, Hesychius, Mauricius, Paulus, and the rest, thirty bishops agreed and signed.” Van Espen after noting that this addition is not found in the Greek, nor in Martin Bracarensis, adds “there is little probability that this clause is of the same antiquity as the canons.” 123 SYNOD OF LAODICEA. A.D. 343–381. Elenchus. Historical Introduction. The Canons, with the Ancient Epitome and Notes. Excursus to Canon XVIII., On the Choir Offices of the Early Church. Excursus to Canon XIX., On the Worship of the Early Church. Excursus to Canon XXII., On the Vestments of the Early Church. Excursus to Canon XXIV., On the Minor Orders in the Early Church. Historical Introduction. 124 The Laodicea at which the Synod met is Laodicea in Phrygia Pacatiana, also called Laodicea ad Lycum, and to be carefully distinguished from the Laodicea in Syria. This much is certain, but as to the exact date of the Synod there is much discussion. Peter de Marca fixed it at the year 365, 199 NPNF (V2-14) Philip Schaff but Pagi in his Critica on Baronius’s Annals172 seems to have overthrown the arguments upon which de Marca rested, and agrees with Gothofred in placing it circa 363.
    [Show full text]
  • This Pdf Is a Digital Offprint of Your Contribution in C. Laes, K
    This pdf is a digital offprint of your contribution in C. Laes, K. Mustakallio & V. Vuolanto (eds), Children and Family in Late Antiquity: Life, Death and Interaction (Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 15), ISBN 978-90-429-3135-0. The copyright on this publication belongs to Peeters Publishers. As author you are licensed to make printed copies of the pdf or to send the unaltered pdf file to up to 50 relations. You may not publish this pdf on the World Wide Web – including websites such as academia.edu and open-access repositories – until three years after publication. Please ensure that anyone receiving an offprint from you observes these rules as well. If you wish to publish your article immediately on open- access sites, please contact the publisher with regard to the payment of the article processing fee. For queries about offprints, copyright and republication of your article, please contact the publisher via [email protected] Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 15 CHILDREN AND FAMILY IN LATE ANTIQUITY LIFE, DEATH AND INTERACTION BY CHRISTIAN LAES, KATARIINA MUSTAKALLIO AND VILLE VUOLANTO PEETERS Leuven – Walpole, MA 2015 997209_Mustakallio_Voorwerk.indd7209_Mustakallio_Voorwerk.indd IIIIII 114/01/154/01/15 112:332:33 CONTENTS Preface and Acknowledgements . VII List of Figures . IX Abbreviations . XI Contributors . XIII 1. Limits and Borders of Childhood and Family in the Roman Empire . 1 Christian LAES, Katariina MUSTAKALLIO and Ville VUOLANTO I. THE DEMOGRAPHIC REGIME AND ECOLOGICAL FACTORS 2. A Time to Die: Preliminary Notes on Seasonal Mortality in Late Antique Rome . 15 Kyle HARPER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frequency of Mass in the Latin Church Ca. 400 Daniel Callam, C.S.B
    Theological Studies 45(1984) THE FREQUENCY OF MASS IN THE LATIN CHURCH CA. 400 DANIEL CALLAM, C.S.B. Si. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan ITURGICAL RENEWAL and clerical celibacy are two contemporary L topics that direct attention to the Church of the fourth century. The form of the Eucharist then, its frequency, the hour and place of celebra­ tion, and its influence on piety—each of these is advanced as a normative guide for the reform of the liturgy today. Among these, the frequency of Mass has become an essential part of a popular thesis about the first laws of clerical celibacy. The supposition is that the clergy of the Latin Church began to celebrate Mass every day at the end of the fourth century. By joining this to the conviction that ritual purity was every­ where observed, some scholars feel they have accounted for the legislation of absolute continence for married clerics in major orders: married clerics who abstained from sexual intercourse the day before the celebration of the Eucharist would automatically be bound to observe total continence if they said Mass every day.1 The force of this simple argument depends completely upon the validity of each of its components: that clerics observed ritual purity; that daily Mass appeared precisely then; that this 1R. Gryson has been the most influential exponent of this view in his book Les origines du célibat ecclésiastique du premier au septième siècle (Gembloux: Duculot, 1970) and in several articles. Cf. also R. Kottje, "Das Aufkommen der täglichen Eucharistiefeier in der Weltkirche und die Zölibatsforderung," ZKG 82 (1971) 218-28.
    [Show full text]
  • Clerical Continence in the Fourth Century: Three Papal Decretals Daniel Callam, C.S.B
    CLERICAL CONTINENCE IN THE FOURTH CENTURY: THREE PAPAL DECRETALS DANIEL CALLAM, C.S.B. St Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan T is WELL KNOWN that the early Church ordained married men but did I not allow an unmarried man or a widower to marry after ordination. As a result, the first step towards the law of clerical celibacy in the Latin Church was to require married clerics in major orders to refrain com­ pletely from conjugal intercourse.1 The earliest instance known is canon 33 of the Council of Elvira (ca. 306) .2 About eighty years later the first papal decretals enforcing continence on married clerics were issued, during the episcopate of Pope Siricius (384-399). General observance of ritual purity and evidence that Mass began to be celebrated daily at that time have suggested that Siricius' legislation was simply a logical deduc­ tion from these two facts: by the principle of ritual purity intercourse was forbidden the day before a religious rite and, since Mass was said every day, married clerics would obviously, almost automatically, have been bound to total continence.3 1 The law of celibacy for the Orthodox Church requires only that the bishop be celibate. The selection of bishops from, or their induction into, monastic life assures the observance of this discipline. 2 For A. W. W. Dale, The Synod of Elvira and Christian Life in the Fourth Century (London: Macmillan, 1882), celibacy was the most effective means by which the hierarchy could establish and maintain its ascendancy over the laity against the increasing power and competition of the ascetics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconoclastic Edict of the Emperor Leo Iii, 726 A.D. Robert John Shedlock University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1968 The iconoclastic edict of the Emperor Leo Iii, 726 A.D. Robert John Shedlock University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Shedlock, Robert John, "The iconoclastic edict of the Emperor Leo Iii, 726 A.D." (1968). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 1958. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/1958 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ICONOCLASTIC EDICT OF THE EMPEROR LEO III 726 A. D. A Thesis Presented by Robert J. Shedlock Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS September, 1968 THE ICONOCLASTIC EDICT OF THE EMPEROR LEO III 726 A.D. A Thesis by Robert .J. Shedlock Approved as to style and content by (Chairman of Committee) ^0ia^d of Depa^fm^nT)^T~ (Member) (Member) September, 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction * page 1 Chapter* I A brief history of the Byzantine Empire from the reign of Justinian the Great (527-65) to the accession of Leo III in 717* ........... 4 * • . page 1 Chapter II The heresies that disturbed Christendom from the time of First Nicaea (325 A.D.) to the Third Council of Constantinople (680-81 A.D.) and what historians have said about these councils in relation- ship to Leo Ill's iconoclastic decree., page 10 Chapter III What historians have said was the basis of the iconoclastic edict of 725 A.D..
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHAPTER 10 HUMAN RESPONSE Every Religion of the World Holds Out
    1 CHAPTER 10 HUMAN RESPONSE Every religion of the world holds out the expectation of the appropriate human response to its perception of the divine. The appropriate response of the religion of ancient Israel differs markedly in form from the appropriate response expected within modern day Judaism. Even within modern Judaism, variations of the response exist between the groups in the family of Judaism. Orthodox, Reformed, Conservative, and Hasidic Jews have varying ways of carrying out the form of their response to God while belonging to the same family of faith. Likewise, Islam has several groups within its family; including the Sunnites, Druse, and Shiites. The family of Hinduism has as many "denominations" as it has regions of the sub-continent who reverence patron deities. Buddhism has these main groups: The Theravada, the Mahayana, and the Vajrayana. While each group within these families have distinctives which set them apart from their brothers and sisters, these distinctives in no way nullify the essential characteristics of the particular religions. Despite the varieties of expression of response to God in light of the gospel by the various major denominational groups and many minor groups, all of these share a central core response that sets Christianity apart from the other religions of the world. Biblical Background The appropriate response to God presented in the New Testament has a basic pre-Mosaic origin which appears at the same time both simple and highly demanding. Its simplicity leaves critics asking "Is that all?" It is this very simplicity which shreds all of the superficiality which 2 too easily clings to religion that leaves others protesting, "The cost is too high." The Gospels As this book has argued, the New Testament presents Jesus as the central factor in humanity's relationship to God.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Church Canon
    Holy Church Canon The Seven Ecumenical Councils of the Undivided Church. Canons and Decrees. Canons of Local Synods with Ecumenical Acceptance FIRST ECUMENICAL COUNCIL - THE CANONS OF THE 318 HOLY FATHERS ASSEMBLED IN THE CITY OF NICE, IN BITHYNIA (CANONS I TO XX) THE NICENE CREED EXCURSUS ON THE NUMBER OF THE NICENE CANONS -- THE CAPTIONS OF THE ARABIC CANONS ATTRIBUTED TO THE COUNCIL OF NICE PROPOSED ACTION ON CLERICAL CELIBACY THE SYNODAL LETTER ON THE KEEPING OF EASTER THE CANONS OF THE COUNCILS OF ANCYRA, GANGRA NEOCAESAREA, ANTIOCH AND LAODICEA--ACCEPTED AND RECEIVED BY THE ECUMENICAL SYNODS, INTRODUCTORY NOTE THE COUNCIL OF ANCYRA, HISTORICAL NOTE & CANONS THE COUNCIL OF NEOCAESAREA, HISTORICAL NOTE & CANONS THE COUNCIL OF GANGRA, HISTORICAL NOTE, SYNODICAL LETTER & CANONS THE SYNOD OF ANTIOCH IN ENCAENIIS, SYNODICAL LETTER & CANONS SYNOD OF LAODICEA, HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION & CANONS THE SECOND ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE FIRST COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE THE THIRD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE COUNCIL OF EPHESUS THE FOURTH ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON THE FIFTH ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE SECOND COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE THE SIXTH ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE THIRD COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE THE CANONS OF THE COUNCIL IN TRULLO (THE QUINISEXT COUNCIL) THE CANONS OF THE SYNODS OF SARDICA, CARTHAGE, CONSTANTINOPLE, AND CARTHAGE UNDER ST. CYPRIAN THE CANONS OF THE CCXVII BLESSED FATHERS WHO ASSEMBLED AT CARTHAGE (THE CODE OF CANONS OF THE AFRICAN CHURCH) COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE HELD UNDER NECTARIUS THE COUNCIL OF CARTHAGE HELD UNDER CYPRIAN THE SEVENTH ECUMENICAL COUNCIL--THE SECOND COUNCIL OF NICE APPENDIX CONTAINING CANONS AND RULINGS NOT HAVING CONCILIAR ORIGIN BUT APPROVED BY NAME IN CANON II OF THE SYNOD IN TRULLO.
    [Show full text]
  • Concoll()Ia Theological Monthly
    Concoll()ia Theological Monthly DECEMBER · 1954 ARCHIVES Concol2~ia Theological Monthly VOL. xxv DECEMBER, 1954 No. 12 The Schism of the Easterr. and N estern Churches By L. W. SPITZ OR a thousand years the church was regarded as a unit in F spite of various sects and occasional violent disagreements among prominent churchmen. Nine hundred years ago it broke into a Greek and a Roman segment. Repeated efforts have been made to heal the breach, but only with passing success. It took a millennium to effect the schism; there is at present no in­ dication that the two segments will ever reunite. The year 1054 has been accepted as the date of the schism. This date, however, merely serves the convenience of the historian. It is a handy road marker along the path of history. Actually the break between the East and the West had taken place in the hearts of many long be­ fore the dramatic incident of that year, when, on July 13, Cardinal Humbert desecrated the altar of the Hagia Sophia with his blas­ phemous pronouncement of the Patriarch's excommunication. Large bodies like the church nine centuries ago do not break without a period, perhaps a long period, of provocation. In fact, the break may be due, in part, to conflicting elements inherent in the group. The schism of 1054 cannot be understood apart from Greek and Roman history - political, economic, intellectual, and religious. When Romulus Augustulus was deposed and the Empire collapsed in the West, the East continued to prosper under various strong rulers.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Our Christian Heritage 1
    _____________________________________________________________________________________ Faculty Guide Examining Our Christian Heritage 1 Clergy Development Church of the Nazarene Kansas City, Missouri 816-333-7000 ext. 2468; 800-306-7651 (USA) 2003 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Examining Our Christian Heritage 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Copyright ©2003 Nazarene Publishing House, Kansas City, MO USA. Created by Church of the Nazarene Clergy Development, Kansas City, MO USA. All rights reserved. All scripture quotations are from the Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV). Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 by the International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved. NASB: From the American Standard Bible (NASB), copyright the Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 973, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. NRSV: From the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Notice to educational providers: This is a contract. By using these materials you accept all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement covers all Faculty Guides, Student Guides, and instructional resources included in this Module. Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, Clergy Development grants to you a nonexclusive license to use these curricular materials provided that you agree to the following: 1. Use of the Modules. • You may distribute this Module in electronic form to students or other educational providers. • You may make and distribute electronic or paper copies to students for the purpose of instruction, as long as each copy contains this Agreement and the same copyright and other proprietary notices pertaining to the Module.
    [Show full text]