DOCSLIB.ORG

Messy Sess 1 Timeline August 2017.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Messy Sess 1 Timeline August 2017.Pages Session One: A Brief History of Messianic Judaism and some of its’ implications… Page 1 FIRST THINGS FIRST 1) The explosion of Jewish people falling in love with Yeshua (Jesus) in the 1960’s and 70’s was a Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit) led movement designed to restore the Jewish people, restore the unity of the Body of Messiah, and to fulfill ancient prophecies that have moved the world closer to the return of Messiah. 2) The prophecies about the restoration of Israel are LITERALLY about the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is not a metaphor for “The Church” - it is not an allegory for the “Spiritual Israel” - and it is NOT about the supposedly “Lost Tribes” being gathered in. (None of the tribes were ever “lost” by the way … we will get to that later in errant theology.) We know who the Jewish people are. There are 12 million of us. 6.6 million are in the land of Israel. The other 6 million WILL come to the Land - or they will perish. 3) The 1960’s and 70’s restoration of a worldwide movement of physically Jewish people who love Jesus - who maintain their Jewish identity and worship Yeshua AS Jews - wasn’t just about the restoration of Israel! The Ruach has also been doing a powerful work in The Church (The Body of Messiah) among gentiles since the 1960’s. This movement is awakening “Ruth Hearts” among the gentile church who have a deep love for Israel, worship Jesus and a Jewish King and Jewish Messiah, read the Brit Chadeshah (New Testament/Covenant) as a Jewish document, and eagerly anticipate the coming prophetic fulfillment of the restoration of Israel, Yeshua sitting on a throne in Jerusalem, and a return of The Temple in Jerusalem and the worship prescribed in the Torah - to its’ rightful central place in the worship and life of ALL of the Body of Messiah! Page 2 Complex Common Judaism Now … let’s begin with what Judaism looked like in 160 B.C.E. (post Maccabean Revolt) into the 1st century. Scholars have used the term “complex common Judaism” to describe the life of the Jewish people in Palestine under Roman rule. The Rabbis were NOT in control. What was “complex?” • Which Rabbi you followed. • Whether or not you went to synagogue or simply to the pilgrimage feasts of Shavuot, Pesach, and Sukkot. • Theology was crazy complex. Was the Sanhedrin from God? Was there a resurrection of the dead? Would Messiah conquer or suffer or both? Was the sacrifice of the High Priest on Yom Kippur accepted in God’s eyes? • Much more What was “common?” • Going to The Temple. • Most eating practices. • Abstaining from idol worship. • Circumcision on the 8th Day. When the Pharisees began to meet in councils around 90 A.D. they began a purposeful revision of Jewish life under their established beliefs. This is when Judaism began to homogenize - and much of how it defined itself was in antipathy toward Yeshua followers. Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 What happened between 130 and 1900 A.D.? We can’t go in-depth into all of this history but: 1) Jewish people and followers of Yeshua were mingling so much that BOTH communities began to place restrictions on their interactions - The Rabbis said - you can’t eat with followers of Yeshua, they can’t celebrate Pesach (Passover) with us, they can’t pray in our synagogues, etc. The increasingly gentile church leaders said - they can’t come into our assemblies (churches), they can’t remain Jewish in eating customs and daily practice (tzit-tzit) if they follow Yeshua. SOME OF THE CHRISTIAN RULINGS: “Christian” Synod of Elvira in 306 A.D. said no intermarriage or eating together. According to historian Shaye J.D. Cohen, early Christianity ceased to be a Jewish sect when it ceased to observe Jewish practices. Among the Jewish practices abandoned by Proto-orthodox Christianity, circumcision was rejected as a requirement at the Council of Jerusalem, c. 50. The establishment of a Jewish Tax known as the fiscus Judaicus helped widen the gap between Christians and Jews for anyone that appeared to be Jewish was taxed after AD 70. Sabbath observance was modified, perhaps as early as Ignatius of Antioch (c.110). Quartodecimanism (observation of a Paschal feast on Nisan 14, the day of preparation for Passover, linked to Polycarp and thus to John the Apostle) was disputed by Pope Victor I (189–199) and formally rejected at the First Council of Nicaea in 325.[26] Page 6 SOME OF THE JEWISH RULINGS: Many of the rulings out of Tiveriah Academy through the 6th century excluded Jews from associating with Christians. These rulings can be found in the Jerusalem Talmud. Blessing on the heretics") is a Jewish curse on heretics" ברכת המינים The Birkat ha-Minim (Hebrew (minim). Modern scholarship has generally evaluated that the Birkat haMinim probably did originally include Jewish Christians before Christianity became markedly a gentile religion. It is the 12th of the Eighteen Benedictions or Amidah. The writing of the benediction is attributed to Shmuel ha-Katan at the supposed Council of Jamnia which was inserted in the "Eighteen Benedictions" as the 19th blessing in the silent prayer to be said thrice daily, the Amidah. To Learn More About “The Great Split”: Book to read: Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity by Daniel Boyarin Lecture to listen to: http://bit.ly/TaShema There was always a faithful remnant of Yeshua following Jewish people. They often assimilated into Gentile Church within 1 generation… but then! A restoration! The 1960’s … crazy hippies … wow! Page 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Messiah in the Siddur Table of Contents
    Teaching from Zion - Volume 30 - October 2013 - Cheshvan 5774 - Netivyah Bible Instruction Ministry - Jerusalem, Israel Teaching from “...forZion out of Zion shall come forth Torah and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” -Isaiah 2:3 Messiah in the Siddur Table of Contents Messiah in the Siddur Who Brings Forth the Horn of Salvation - Joseph Shulam - 4 Amfian Gerasimov - A Righteous from Among the Nations - 8 Before All Beginnings - Ammikam Tavor - 12 May Our Eyes Behold Your Return - Elhanan Ben-Avraham - 15 The Institution of the Synagogue and Its Impact on Early Messianic Judaism - Joseph Shulam - 16 Netivyah Building Project - 24 News from Netivyah - 26 Teaching from Zion - Volume 30 - October 2013 - Cheshvan 5774 Published by Netivyah Bible Instruction Ministry, Jerusalem, Israel Editor - Beth Shulam Layout - Shaul Zofef Cover Photo - Ancient Olive Tree, by Patrizio Martorana Disclaimer - The articles printed in this issue of Teaching from Zion are the sole responsibility of their authors Feel free to contact us at: [email protected], or by mail: PO Box 8043, Jerusalem 91080, ISRAEL For more information please visit our website: www.netivyah.org or search for Netivyah on Facebook A Word from the Editor Beth Shulam This issue of Teaching from Zion is Siddur is Jewish life in words. There are surface the hidden messages about the published in the fall of the year 2013. a plethora of Siddur with differences Messiah buried through the centuries. In the Jewish world, this time of year mainly based on the part of the world When we dig deep into our literature traditionally marks the beginning your ancestors are from.
    [Show full text]
  • Events of the Reformation Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution
    May 20, 2018 Events of the Reformation Protestants and Roman Catholics agree on first 5 centuries. What changed? Why did some in the Church want reform by the 16th century? Outline Why the Reformation? 1. Church becomes powerful institution. 2. Additional teaching and practices were added. 3. People begin questioning the Church. 4. Martin Luther’s protest. Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution Evidence of Rome’s power grab • In 2nd century we see bishops over regions; people looked to them for guidance. • Around 195AD there was dispute over which day to celebrate Passover (14th Nissan vs. Sunday) • Polycarp said 14th Nissan, but now Victor (Bishop of Rome) liked Sunday. • A council was convened to decide, and they decided on Sunday. • But bishops of Asia continued the Passover on 14th Nissan. • Eusebius wrote what happened next: “Thereupon Victor, who presided over the church at Rome, immediately attempted to cut off from the common unity the parishes of all Asia, with the churches that agreed with them, as heterodox [heretics]; and he wrote letters and declared all the brethren there wholly excommunicate.” (Eus., Hist. eccl. 5.24.9) Everyone started looking to Rome to settle disputes • Rome was always ending up on the winning side in their handling of controversial topics. 1 • So through a combination of the fact that Rome was the most important city in the ancient world and its bishop was always right doctrinally then everyone started looking to Rome. • So Rome took that power and developed it into the Roman Catholic Church by the 600s. Church granted power to rule • Constantine gave the pope power to rule over Italy, Jerusalem, Constantinople and Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Essay on Mandatory Celibacy Here
    What is the most underrated event of the past, and why is it so much more significant than people understand? When the Gregorian Reform was launched at the dawn of the second millennium, the papacy’s agenda was unequivocal. In an effort to centralise power and re-establish authority, a succession of popes both before and after Gregory VII (d. 1085), the reform’s namesake, introduced changes designed to free the Church from lay control. Secular rulers were stripped of their sacerdotal functions and clerics came to be the sole representatives of the Church, rather than the laity, as simony, investiture, and nicolaitism (i.e., clerical marriage) came under attack. The most far-reaching and long-lasting repercussions of these reforms, however, yet the most overlooked by historians, was the social upheaval caused by enforced clerical celibacy and its particularly devastating effect on women. The relentless onslaughts on clerical marriage instigated a social revolution that spanned the European continent, provoking riots for centuries, and, most perniciously, demonising half the world’s population as the reformers campaigned against women in order to make marriage less appealing. Misogyny has been woven so deeply into history that its nuanced causes and effects at any given time can be difficult to discern. But an analysis of the rhetoric used by reformers to vilify clerical wives and women in general can trace the revitalised hostility towards women beginning in the High Middle Ages to these reforms. For the first thousand years of Christianity, clerical marriage was common practice. Despite various church councils promulgating the ideal of celibacy, beginning with the Synod of Elvira in the fourth century which declared that all clerics were to “abstain from conjugal relations with their wives”1, deacons, priests, bishops, and even popes continued to marry and have children.
    [Show full text]
  • Triumphal Entry Nissan 10Th. (Research Quartodecimanism Controversy)
    Triumphal entry Nissan 10th. (Research Quartodecimanism controversy) The 14th became known as Preparation Day (Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54, John 19:31), because on it they made ready for the great feast day beginning at sundown, after which no work was permitted. Matthew identifies the day after the Crucifixion as the day after Preparation Day (27:62) so all four Gospels agree. Jesus died on Preparation day, the 14th of their month Nisan, which is Passover. He ate the ritual meal with His disciples in the Upper Room, and then was arrested, tried, convicted, and put to death; all on Passover. He had to be, in order to fulfill the prophecies of the Passover Lamb. So just like the Lord had commanded in Exodus 12, He was selected on the 10th, inspected on the 11th, 12th, and 13th, and executed on the 14th of Nisan. Matthew 26-28 Mark 11-16 Luke 22-24 John 18-21 A.Triumphal entry 21:1-17 11:1-11, 15-17 19:28-46 12:12-15 B. cleansing Order: Order: Order: Order: temple A, B, D, C A, D, C, B, C. A, B A C. fig tree D. return to - Yeshua would come Bethany (house of out of “Egypt” like poor (ahn-yah) – the mixed multitude related to bread of Ayin-nun-yod affliction (oh-ney) Plot to kill Jesus 26:1-5 14:1, 2 22:1,2 11:45-53 You know that after Now the Feast of And the Passover of the Jews was near two days is the Unleavened Passover (when Bread (known as Jesus will be killed).
    [Show full text]
  • Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Heresy Description Origin Official
    Trinitarian/Christological Heresies Official Heresy Description Origin Other Condemnation Adoptionism Belief that Jesus Propounded Theodotus was Alternative was born as a by Theodotus of excommunicated names: Psilanthro mere (non-divine) Byzantium , a by Pope Victor and pism and Dynamic man, was leather merchant, Paul was Monarchianism. [9] supremely in Rome c.190, condemned by the Later criticized as virtuous and that later revived Synod of Antioch presupposing he was adopted by Paul of in 268 Nestorianism (see later as "Son of Samosata below) God" by the descent of the Spirit on him. Apollinarism Belief proposed Declared to be . that Jesus had by Apollinaris of a heresy in 381 by a human body Laodicea (died the First Council of and lower soul 390) Constantinople (the seat of the emotions) but a divine mind. Apollinaris further taught that the souls of men were propagated by other souls, as well as their bodies. Arianism Denial of the true The doctrine is Arius was first All forms denied divinity of Jesus associated pronounced that Jesus Christ Christ taking with Arius (ca. AD a heretic at is "consubstantial various specific 250––336) who the First Council of with the Father" forms, but all lived and taught Nicea , he was but proposed agreed that Jesus in Alexandria, later exonerated either "similar in Christ was Egypt . as a result of substance", or created by the imperial pressure "similar", or Father, that he and finally "dissimilar" as the had a beginning declared a heretic correct alternative. in time, and that after his death. the title "Son of The heresy was God" was a finally resolved in courtesy one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petrine Ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils
    The Petrine ministry at the time of the first four ecumenical councils: relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils Author: Pierluigi De Lucia Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1852 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2010 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. BOSTON COLLEGE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AND MINISTRY WESTON JESUIT DEPARTEMENT The Petrine ministry at the Time of the First Four Ecumenical Councils Relations between the Bishop of Rome and the Eastern Bishops as revealed in the canons, process, and reception of the councils A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the S.T.L. Degree Of the School of Theology and Ministry By: Pierluigi De Lucia, S.J. Directed by: Francine Cardman Second Reader: Francis A. Sullivan, S.J. May 2010 © Copyright by Pierluigi DE LUCIA, S.J. 2010 Abstract The Petrine ministry of the bishops of Rome and relations with the eastern bishops at the time of the first four ecumenical councils are the focus of this thesis. It places the Church in the complex historical context marked by the public recognition of Christianity under Constantine (312) and the great novelty of the close interactions of the emperors with the bishops of the major sees in the period, Rome, Alexandria, Antioch and Constantinople. The study examines the structures of the church (local and regional synods and ecumenical councils) and the roles of bishops and emperors in the ecumenical councils of Nicaea (325), Constantinople I (381), Ephesus (431), and Chalcedon (451), including the “robber” council of 449.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Longer Canon Law Introduction Page For
    LONGER CANON LAW INTRODUCTION PAGE FOR DOWNLOADING (material taken from the CLSA commissioned The Code of Canon Law, A Text and Commentary, edited by James Coriden, Thomas Green and Donald Heintschel (Paulist Press, New York: 1985), pp. 1-22). I. The Historical Development of Law in the Church. There are basically 5 historical periods in the history of the development of law in the Church. These are as follows: 1. The Early Christian Community (1-8 centuries). The early Christian Church, at least in Jewish sectors, incorporated the laws of the Old Testament into its life and practices. In the Old Testament, there were laws, which focused on the worship of the Jewish people, laws concerned with dietary regulations, and moral laws given by God for his people. In the earliest writings of the New Testament, laws appear. St. Paul, the first writer of the New Testament, presents lists of moral and disciplinary directives to be observed by all believers. He speaks at some length on marriage, the giving of directives for the moral life, and on amending the Jewish ritual practices of the early Christians, so that Christianity would not simply remain a Jewish sect. The early Church councils made determinations that were fairly specific and localized. They sought to offer specific solutions to specific problems now being faced by the growing Church. Many early canonical decisions and legislation was made from local, regional and provincial councils, such as the Synod of Elvira (in about the year 300). After the Edict of Constantine (313), the Church began another stage of development, since it was now free to grow and expand beyond the borders of the Roman Empire, without fear of persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Community That Raymond Brown Left Behind: Reflections on the Johannine Dialectical Situation1
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies College of Christian Studies 2014 The ommC unity that Raymond Brown Left Behind: Reflections on the Johannine Dialectical Situation (Chapter in Communities in Dispute : Current Scholarship on the Johannine Epistles) Paul N. Anderson George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs Part of the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Paul N., "The ommC unity that Raymond Brown Left Behind: Reflections on the Johannine Dialectical Situation (Chapter in Communities in Dispute : Current Scholarship on the Johannine Epistles)" (2014). Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies. 287. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs/287 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Christian Studies at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Community that Raymond Brown Left Behind: Reflections on the Johannine Dialectical Situation1 Paul N. Anderson Among the paradigm-making contributions in Johannine studies over the last half century, one of the most significant is the sketching of “the com- munity of the Beloved Disciple” by Raymond E. Brown (1979). Extending beyond Johannine studies, Brown’s (1984) work on the history of early Christianity and “the churches the apostles left behind” is also among the most practical and interesting of his forty-seven books.2 Here, Brown’s analysis of the unity and diversity of early Christian approaches to leader- ship and community organization3 have extensive implications, not only for historical and sociological understandings of the first-century Chris- tian movement, but also for approaches to Christian leadership in later 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lord Is There: Christian Views of the Temple in the First Century AD
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY THE LORD IS THERE: CHRISTIAN ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE TEMPLE IN THE FIRST CENTURY BY JONATHAN WELLS MASTER’S THESIS SUBMITTED TO DR. RANDALL PRICE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF MA IN PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, BIBLICAL STUDIES MAY 7, 2014 1 INTRODUCTION Throughout the entirety of the Scriptures the temple and its service has been held in reverence as the worship of the one true God. From the very beginning to the last passages of Revelation the temple is a central theme. Yeshua (Jesus) taught in the temple and went to it for the principle feasts. After the resurrection, the disciples continued to meet there and even Paul showed reverence towards the temple by worshiping and sacrificing there. Also, the eschatological views of the New Testament were highly influenced by those of the Hebrew Scriptures and focused heavily on Jerusalem and the temple. So the Christians of the first century, both Jew and Gentile, held the temple in very high regard and viewed it as the legitimate dwelling place of God on earth. Even after the tearing of the veil, the resurrection and the destruction of the temple,1 the earliest followers of the messiah still viewed it as a legitimate institution that would be present in the latter days. Statement of the Problem According to the Gospels, Yeshua worshiped at the temple during all the principle feasts (John 2:13, 7, 10:22 etc.). Indeed if he would have done otherwise, he would have been breaking the commandments found in the Torah and therefore would not have been considered a perfect sacrifice.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Christian Chronology and the Origins of the Christmas Date
    QL 94 (2013) 247-265 doi: 10.2143/QL.94.3.3007366 © 2013, all rights reserved EARLY CHRISTIAN CHRONOLOGY AND THE ORIGINS OF THE CHRISTMAS DATE In Defense of the “Calculation Theory” 1. The Recent Onslaught against the “Calculation Theory” Christmas, the feast commemorating the birth of Jesus Christ, is celebrat- ed in both the Western and Eastern churches (excepting Armenia) on 25 December. The same date once used to be the seat of the winter solstice in the Julian calendar and, as some would have it, the day on which the birth festival of the Roman sun god Sol Invictus was celebrated after its institution in 274 CE by the Emperor Aurelian. In the eyes of many ob- servers, such coincidence dictates that Christmas is best seen as an exam- ple for the “inculturation” of pagan rituals into the developing liturgical year of the Church.1 This, in a nutshell, is the basic idea behind the most 1. The amount of literature on the origins of Christmas is vast. For useful introduc- tions, see Hermann Usener, Das Weihnachtsfest (Bonn: Bouvier, 31969 [11889]); Heinrich Kellner, Heortologie (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 31911) 96-118; Bernard Botte, Les origines de la Noël et de l’Épiphanie: Étude historique (Louvain: Abbaye du Mont César, 1932); Anselm Strittmatter, “Christmas and the Epiphany: Origins and Antecedents,” Thought 17 (1942) 600-626; Hieronymus Frank, “Frühgeschichte und Ursprung des römischen Weihnachtsfestes im Lichte neuerer Forschung,” Archiv für Liturgiewissen- schaft 2 (1952) 1-24; Leonard Fendt, “Der heutige Stand der Forschung über das Geburts- fest Jesu am 25.
    [Show full text]
  • WHICH DAY SHOULD WE OBSERVE SABBATH? by the Rev
    WHICH DAY SHOULD WE OBSERVE SABBATH? By the Rev. Philip Bottomley [Unless otherwise stated all Scripture references are from the New Revised Standard Version.] THE BIBLICAL BACKGROUND In Genesis chapter 2 we read: “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished and all their multitude. And on the seventh day God finished the work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all the work that he had done. So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all the work that he had done in creation.” (vv. 13) The Hebrew word “shabbat” simply means “rest.” However, in this article when I capitalize it— Shabbat—it refers to this seventh day, which God hallowed because on it he rested from all the work that he had done in creation. It is worth noting that while the formula: “And there was evening and there was morning, the first day [etc.],” concludes the account of each of the six days of creation, it is not there after the description of the seventh day as the day of rest for God. In the Mosaic Laws the LORD commanded his people Israel to observe the seventh day of each week as a sabbath, a holy-day of rest. [In this article, when I capitalize this word—Sabbath—it will mean this weekly Holy-Day.] Two different reasons for such a command are given in the two versions of the Decalogue—the Ten Commandments. In Exodus 20 (vv.8-11) God says: “Remember the sabbath day to keep it holy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Saperstein Research and Academic Development Chart
    RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT CHART 2011-12 to 2015-16 Name: Marc Saperstein, Professor of Jewish History and Homiletics, LBC PUBLICATIONS DATE/ Books S 2014 Leadership and Conflict; Tensions in Medieval and Early Modern Jewish History and Culture (Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2014). 2016 The Jews in Christian Europe: A Source Book, 215-1791, by Jacob Rader Marcus and Marc Saperstein (Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, January 2016). Articles “A Jewish Response to John T. Pawlikowski and Mary C. Boys,” in Christ Jesus 2011 and the Jewish People Today: New Explorations of Theological Interrelationships, ed. Philip A. Cunningham et al. (Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011), pp. 64–76. “Spanish Jewish Leadership in the Generation of the Expulsion: Rabbi Isaac Aboab II”, in A Passion for Judaism, A Festschrift: Essays in Honour of Tony Bayfield, ed. by Jonathan A. Romain (London: RSGB Publications, 2011), “Progressive Judaism at 200 Years: A Retrospect”, in Festschrift in Honour of the 70th Birthday of Rabbi Maurice Michaels (London: Kulmus Publishing, 2011), pp. 87–108. “Sermons and History: The ‘Marrano’ Connection,” in All These Vows: Kol Nidre, ed. Lawrence A. Hoffman (Woodstock, Vt.: Jewish Lights, 2011), pp. 31– 38. 2012 “Islamic Antisemitism”, in Confronting Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, ed. Faissal Hameed and Mehri Niknam (Joseph Interfaith Foundation, 2011), pp. 108 – 15. “The Baal Shem Tov and the Priest: On Problematic Texts and Dialogue”, website on Jewish-Non-Jewish Relations, launched July 2011: http://www.jnjr.div.ed.ac.uk/Primary%20Sources/Early_Modern/saperstein_ba alshemtovpriest.html “Rabbi Hugo Gryn as Preacher,” European Judaism, 45 (Spring, 2012): 58–77.
    [Show full text]