DOCSLIB.ORG

Crusader Q2 2020 Research Edition Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crusader Q2 2020 Research Edition Download Your resource for the latest research into the MET alteration. CRUSADER NEWSLETTER Q2 2020 RESEARCH EDITION MET Crusaders is a community of Lung Cancer patients and care givers collaborating with advocates and medical professionals collectively dedicated to helping patients with a MET alteration live normal lives. Come Join Us! [email protected] In this edition Top-level MET gene copy number gain defines .................... 2 Molecular Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance ................... 5 a subtype of poorly differentiated pulmonary to MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients adenocarcinomas with poor prognosis with MET Exon 14-Mutant NSCLC EDITOR Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of ............................. 2 MET Alterations Are a Recurring and Actionable .................. 6 Jessica McKernan, PharmD Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea Resistance Mechanism in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer with MET Exon 14 Skipping Atrium Health Tepotinib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with ...................... 6 Charlotte, NC Clinical and molecular correlates of PD-L1 ........................... 2 MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations (VISION Trial) expression in patients with lung adenocarcinomas Therapeutic Efficacy of ABN401, a Highly ............................. 7 CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy ................. 3 Potent and Selective MET Inhibitor, Based on Julia Stevens, PharmD in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With BRAF, HER2, Diagnostic Biomarker Test in MET-Addicted Cancer or MET Mutations or RET Translocation: GFPC 01-2018 Beth Israel Deaconess Erlotinib plus tivantinib versus erlotinib alone ..................... 7 Medical Center Alterations in the PI3K Pathway Drive Resistance ................ 3 in patients with previously treated stage IIIb/IV Boston, MA to MET Inhibitors in NSCLC Harboring MET non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis based Exon 14 Skipping Mutations on randomized controlled trials Laura Schmidt, PharmD Incidence and PD-L1 Expression of MET 14 .......................... 4 Tepotinib plus gefitinib in patients with ................................. 8 Northwestern Memorial Skipping in Chinese Population: A Non-Selective EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer with Hospital NSCLC Cohort Study Using RNA-Based Sequencing MET overexpression or MET amplification and Chicago, IL acquired resistance to previous EGFR inhibitor High-level gain of mesenchymal-epithelial ............................ 4 (INSIGHT study): an open-label, phase 1b/2, transition factor (MET) copy number using CONTENT ADVISOR multicentre, randomised trial next-generation sequencing as a predictive Laura Greco biomarker for MET inhibitor efficacy Response to Checkpoint Inhibition in .................................... 8 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Molecular MET Crusaders Management of NSCLC Patients with ..................................... 5 Driver Alterations MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations CRUSADER EWSLETTER Q2 2020 RESEARCH EDITION Top-level MET gene copy number gain defines a subtype of poorly differentiated pulmonary adenocarcinomas with poor prognosis Journal: Translational Lung Cancer Research A variety of MET alterations can occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including MET amplification. This study aimed to quantify and define what it means to be MET amplified. A total of 373 patients with NSCLC were tested for their MET gene copy number (GCN). The data led to defining the top-level category for MET amplification as greater than the 90th percentile of the average GCN, or at least 10 MET gene copies per tumor cell on average. Data from trials with MET inhibitors have suggested that these inhibitors may have a “gene dose effect,” suggesting that the GCN may play a role in response to inhibitors and survival outcomes. The authors of this study suggest it may be reasonable to give patients with MET top-level amplification earlier access to MET inhibitors by using it in the first line setting given the aggressive nature of MET top-level amplified NSCLC, though much further research is needed through prospective clinical trials to support this. LINK TO ARTICLE Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Korea with MET Exon 14 Skipping Journal: In Vivo This study assessed Korean patients with NSCLC and MET exon 14 skipping. A total of 1,020 patients were analyzed via next-generation sequencing, 20 of which were found to have MET exon 14 skipping (all negative for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and RET alterations). The median overall survival (OS) in patients who received first-line traditional platinum-based chemotherapy was 9.5 months, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months. This illustrates poor clinical outcomes and low responses to therapy in these patients in the setting of many advancements and recent approvals of several MET inhibitors, emphasizing the need for screening for MET exon 14 skipping alterations in patients with NSCLC. LINK TO ARTICLE Clinical and molecular correlates of PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinomas Journal: Annals of Oncology Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an FDA-approved biomarker that can help determine the body’s response to antibody drugs like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This article took a deeper dive into the molecular and clinical features of PD-L1 expression and how these features may help predict a patient’s response to ICIs. A total of 1,586 patients with lung adenocarcinoma had undergone PD-L1 testing. PD-L1 expression was significantly lower in primary tissue than metastatic tissue but did not significantly differ based on smoker status. PD-L1 was expressed at different levels depending on organ type. Among metastatic sites, PD-L1 expression was highest in lymph nodes and lowest in bone. KRAS, TP53, and MET alterations were associated with high PD-L1 expression, while EGFR, STK11, and WNT alterations were associated with negative PD-L1 expression. Among the frequent gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas, patients with MET alterations had the greatest proportion of PD-L1 high expression. These results demonstrate that there may be a correlation between levels of PD-L1 expression and existence of other molecular markers. LINK TO ARTICLE 2 CRUSADER EWSLETTER Q2 2020 RESEARCH EDITION Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With BRAF, HER2, or MET Mutations or RET Translocation: GFPC 01-2018 Journal of Thoracic Oncology The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 107 patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring BRAF, HER2, MET, or RET alterations. A total of 44 patients had a BRAF mutation, 23 had a HER2 mutation, 30 had a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, and 9 had a RET mutation. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status was known in 70 patients, 34 of which were greater than or equal to 1% expression. These patients had received a median of one treatment prior to ICI. Median duration of response was 15.4 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.7 months, and overall survival (OS) was 16.2 months. Response rates varied based on alteration (BRAF: 26 to 35%, HER2: 27%, MET: 36%, RET: 38%). Of note, patients with MET exon 14 skipping were treated with either pembrolizumab or nivolumab, with a response rate of 35.7%, a median duration of treatment of 3.3 months, a median duration of response of 10.4 months, median PFS of 4.9 months, and median OS of 13.4 months. Overall, this study demonstrated higher response rates in patients with MET exon 14 skipping compared to previous studies. This study concluded that ICI efficacy in patients with metastatic NSCLC and BRAF, HER2, MET, or RET alterations was similar to patients who did not harbor these alterations as shown in previous studies, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. LINK TO ARTICLE Alterations in the PI3K Pathway Drive Resistance to MET Inhibitors in NSCLC Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations Journal of Thoracic Oncology This article emphasizes the prevalence of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with NSCLC and MET exon 14 skipping mutations. Previous studies suggest response rates to targeted therapies like TKIs may be lower in patients with MET exon 14 skipping compared to other alterations, potentially due to this resistance. As a result, this study looked at the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which is known to be connected to MET. They hypothesized that patients with PI3K pathway alterations and MET exon 14 skipping may have resistance to MET TKIs. They analyzed 65 patients with MET exon 14 skipping and assessed if they had any PI3K pathway alterations. They then used a cell line derived from a patient with known MET TKI resistance and cell lines from patients who had MET exon 14 skipping and a PI3K pathway alteration to assess sensitivity to a MET TKI (capmatinib, tepotinib, crizotinib, or foretinib) with or without a PI3K inhibitor (GDC0941). The researchers found a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation in 2 of 65 samples (3%) and loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN, which helps regulate PI3K pathway signaling) in 6 of 26 samples (23%). All 3 patients who were treated with a MET TKI (specific inhibitor not listed as patients were receiving through clinical trials) and had progression at their first clinical assessment after starting the MET TKI also had a PI3K alteration. Additionally, MET TKIs had no effect on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treatment and Testing Guidelines
    For patients with METex14 and BRAF V600E in mNSCLC, TREATMENT AND TESTING GUIDELINES METex14 BRAF V600E BRAF, v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1; MET, mesenchymal-epithelial transition; METex14, MET exon 14 skipping; mNSCLC, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Indication Indication TABRECTA® (capmatinib) tablets is indicated for the TAFINLAR® (dabrafenib) capsules, in combination with treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small MEKINIST® (trametinib) tablets, is indicated for the cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have a mutation treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell that leads to mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) lung cancer (NSCLC) with BRAF V600E mutation as exon 14 skipping as detected by an FDA-approved test. detected by an FDA-approved test. This indication is approved under accelerated approval Limitation of Use: TAFINLAR is not indicated for the based on overall response rate and duration of treatment of patients with wild-type BRAF NSCLC. response. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical Important Safety Information benefit in confirmatory trials. New Primary Malignancies. Important Safety Information Cutaneous Malignancies Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis. Across clinical trials of TAFINLAR administered with ILD/pneumonitis, which can be fatal, occurred in MEKINIST (“the combination”), the incidence patients treated with TABRECTA. ILD/pneumonitis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cuSCCs), occurred in 4.5% of patients treated with TABRECTA including keratoacanthomas, occurred in 2% of in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, with 1.8% of patients patients. Basal cell carcinoma and new primary experiencing grade 3 ILD/pneumonitis and 1 patient melanoma occurred in 3% and <1% of patients, experiencing death (0.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Daiichi Sankyo Group Value Report 2019
    External Evaluations (as of June 30,2019) ™ Daiichi Sankyo Group Value Report 2019 Value Daiichi Sankyo Group MSCI Japan Empowering Women Select Index THE INCLUSION OF DAIICHI SANKYO CO.,LTD. IN ANY MSCI INDEX, AND THE USE OF MSCI LOGOS, TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS OR INDEX NAMES HEREIN, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SPONSORSHIP, ENDORSEMENT OR PROMOTION OF DAIICHI SANKYO CO.,LTD. BY MSCI OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES. THE MSCI INDEXES ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF MSCI. MSCI AND THE MSCI INDEX NAMES AND LOGOS ARE TRADE- MARKS OR SERVICE MARKS OF MSCI OR ITS AFFILIATES. “Eruboshi” Certification Mark “Kurumin” Certification Mark Logo given to Certified Health and Productivity Management Organization (White500) This report uses FSC® certified paper, which indicates that the paper used to print this Paper report was produced from properly managed forests. 3-5-1, Nihonbashi-honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8426, Japan This report was printed using 100% Inks biodegradable printing inks from vegetable Corporate Communications Department oil. Daiichi Sankyo Group Tel: +81-3-6225-1126 CSR Department The waterless printing method used for this Value Report 2019 Tel: +81-3-6225-1067 Printing report minimized the use and release of harmful liquid wastes. https://www.daiichisankyo.com/ Printed in Japan 005_7045687911909.indd 1 2019/09/27 18:22:19 Introduction Our Mission The Core Values and Commitments serve as the criteria for business activities and In addition, we have established the DAIICHI SANKYO Group Corporate Conduct Charter . decision-making used by executive officers and employees in working to fulfill Our Mission . This charter calls on us to fulfill our social responsibilities by acting with the highest ethical Our Corporate Slogan succinctly explains the spirit of Our Mission, Core Values and standards and a good social conscience appropriate for a company engaged in business Commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Therapies in Melanoma: Knowledge, Resistance And
    ooggeenneessii iinn ss && rrcc aa MM CC uu tt ff aa Journal ofJournal of oo gg ll ee ee aa aa nn nn nn nn ee ee rr rr ss ss uu uu ii ii Colombino et al., J Carcinog Mutagen 2014, S4:S4 ss ss oo oo JJ JJ ISSN: 2157-2518 CarCarcinogenesiscinogenesis & Mutagenesis DOI: 10.4172/2157-2518.S4-004 Review Article Open Access Targeted Therapies in Melanoma: Knowledge, Resistance and Perspectives Maria Colombino1*, Maria Cristina Sini1, Amelia Lissia2, Antonio Cossu2, and Giuseppe Palmieri1 1Unit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR), Italy 2University Hospital Health Unit - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU), Via Matteotti, 07100 Sassari, Italy *Corresponding author: Dr. Maria Colombino, Unit of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR), Traversa La Crucca, 3 - Baldinca Li Punti, 07100 Sassari, Italy, Tel. +39 079 2841239; Fax +39 079 2841299; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: Mar 18, 2014, Accepted date: May 25, 2014, Published date: May 31, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Colombino M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Several molecular mechanisms appear to play a major role in melanoma genesis and progression. Current targeted therapies focus on contrasting the activation of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and, to a less extent, PI3K/AKT pathways. Development of inhibitors of key effectors (mainly, BRAF mutant and MEK) has significantly improved treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Adult
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 5, 2011; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1002 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Adult Patients with Metastatic Solid Tumors Lee S. Rosen,1* Neil Senzer,2 Tarek Mekhail,3 Ram Ganapathi,3 Feng Chai,4 Ronald E Savage,4 Carol Waghorne,4 Giovanni Abbadessa,4 Brian Schwartz,4 Robert Dreicer3 1Premiere Oncology, 2020 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 600, Santa Monica, CA 90404. 2Mary Crowley Cancer Research Centers, 1700 Pacific St, Suite 1100, Dallas, TX 75201. 3 Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue R35, Cleveland, OH 44195. Dr. Mekhail is now with Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, 2501 North Orange Avenue, Orlando FL 32804. 4ArQule, Inc., Woburn, MA. *Corresponding author: Lee Rosen Tel: (310) 633-8400 Fax: (310) 633-8419 E-mail: [email protected] Running Title: Phase I Trial of Tivantinib in Patients with Metastatic Solid Tumors Key words: tivantinib, ARQ 197, pharmacokinetics, phase I, safety Word count: 3657 (not including Abstract and references) 41 references 5 tables and 1 figure 1 Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 23, 2021. © 2011 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on October 5, 2011; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1002 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Translational Relevance Inhibitors of the receptor tyrosine kinase c-MET and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), have demonstrated activity in select cancer types.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing The
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY 71 (2017) 426–436 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Review – Kidney Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Different Systemic Treatments for Non-clear[3_TD$IF] Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Sergio Ferna´ndez-Pello a,[3_TD$IF] Fabian Hofmann b, Rana Tahbaz c, Lorenzo Marconi d, Thomas B. Lam e,f, Laurence Albiges g, Karim Bensalah h, Steven E. Canfield i, Saeed Dabestani j, Rachel H. Giles k, Milan Hora l, Markus A. Kuczyk m, Axel S. Merseburger n, Thomas Powles o, Michael Staehler p, Alessandro Volpe q,Bo¨rje Ljungberg r, Axel Bex s,* a Department of Urology, Cabuen˜es Hospital, Gijo´n, Spain; b Department of Urology, Sunderby Hospital, Sunderby, Sweden; c Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; d Department of Urology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal; e Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; f Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK; g Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; h Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France; i Division of Urology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; j Department of Urology, Ska˚ne University Hospital, Malmo¨, Sweden; k Patient Advocate International Kidney Cancer Coalition (IKCC), University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Utrecht, The Netherlands; l Department of Urology, Faculty Hospital
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance Mechanisms to Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    www.nature.com/bjc REVIEW ARTICLE Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer Alessandro Leonetti1,2, Sugandhi Sharma2, Roberta Minari1, Paola Perego3, Elisa Giovannetti2,4 and Marcello Tiseo 1,5 Osimertinib is an irreversible, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is highly selective for EGFR-activating mutations as well as the EGFR T790M mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR oncogene addiction. Despite the documented efficacy of osimertinib in first- and second-line settings, patients inevitably develop resistance, with no further clear-cut therapeutic options to date other than chemotherapy and locally ablative therapy for selected individuals. On account of the high degree of tumour heterogeneity and adaptive cellular signalling pathways in NSCLC, the acquired osimertinib resistance is highly heterogeneous, encompassing EGFR-dependent as well as EGFR- independent mechanisms. Furthermore, data from repeat plasma genotyping analyses have highlighted differences in the frequency and preponderance of resistance mechanisms when osimertinib is administered in a front-line versus second-line setting, underlying the discrepancies in selection pressure and clonal evolution. This review summarises the molecular mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, including MET/HER2 amplification, activation of the RAS–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) or RAS–phosphatidylinositol
    [Show full text]
  • Tepotinib) Tablets, for Oral Use Any Severity
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS----------------------- These highlights do not include all the information needed to use TEPMETKO safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for • Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis: Immediately withhold TEPMETKO. TEPMETKO in patients with suspected ILD/pneumonitis. Permanently discontinue TEPMETKO in patients diagnosed with ILD/pneumonitis of TEPMETKO® (tepotinib) tablets, for oral use any severity. (2.3, 5.1) Initial U.S. Approval: 2021 • Hepatotoxicity: Monitor liver function tests. Withhold, dose reduce, or permanently discontinue TEPMETKO based on severity. (5.2) ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE--------------------------- • Embryo-fetal toxicity: TEPMETKO can cause fetal harm. Advise of potential risk to a fetus and use of effective contraception. (5.3, 8.1, 8.3) TEPMETKO is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mesenchymal- -------------------------------ADVERSE REACTIONS------------------------------ epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping alterations. (1) Most common adverse reactions (≥ 20%) were edema, fatigue, nausea, This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on overall diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, and dyspnea. The most common Grade 3 to 4 response rate and duration of response. Continued approval for this indication laboratory abnormalities (≥ 2%) were decreased lymphocytes, decreased may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in albumin, decreased sodium, increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, increased confirmatory trials. (1) amylase, increased ALT, increased AST, and decreased hemoglobin. (6.1) -----------------------DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION----------------------- To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact EMD Serono at 1-800-283-8088 ext. 5563 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or • Select patients for treatment with TEPMETKO on the presence of METex14 www.fda.gov/medwatch.
    [Show full text]
  • First-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Driver Alterations
    First-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Driver Alterations Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer Nonsquamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma Activating EGFR mutation other Sensitizing (L858R/exon 19 MET exon 14 skipping than exon 20 insertion mutations, EGFR exon 20 mutation ALK rearrangement ROS1 rearrangement BRAF V600E mutation RET rearrangement NTRK rearrangement mutations KRAS alterations HER2 alterations NRG1 alterations deletion) EGFR mutation T790M, L858R or Ex19Del PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options Emerging target; no Emerging target; no Emerging target; no Platinum doublet † † † Osimertinib monotherapy S Afatinib monotherapy M M Alectinib S Entrectinib M Dabrafenib/trametinib M Capmatinib M Selpercatinib M Entrectinib M conclusions available conclusions available conclusions available chemotherapy ± bevacizumab Gefitinib with doublet Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on M M M Brigatinib S Crizotinib M M Tepotinib M Pralsetinib* W Larotrectinib M chemotherapy non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline If alectinib or brigatinib are not available If entrectinib or crizotinib are not available Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Dacomitinib monotherapy M Osimertinib W M M M Ceritinib S Ceritinib W non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline Monotherapy with afatinib M Crizotinib S Lortlatinib W Standard treatment based on Erlotinib/ramucirumab M M non-driver mutation guideline Erlotinib/bevacizumab M Monotherapy with erlotinib M Strength of Recommendation Monotherapy with gefitinib M S Strong M Moderate W Weak Monotherapy with icotinib M Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article the Selective C-Met Inhibitor Tepotinib Can Overcome
    Am J Cancer Res 2017;7(4):962-972 www.ajcr.us /ISSN:2156-6976/ajcr0053156 Original Article The selective c-Met inhibitor tepotinib can overcome epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor resistance mediated by aberrant c-Met activation in NSCLC models Manja Friese-Hamim1, Friedhelm Bladt2, Giuseppe Locatelli2, Uz Stammberger3, Andree Blaukat3 1Translational In Vivo Pharmacology, 2Translational and Biomarker Research, 3Global Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany Received March 17, 2017; Accepted March 27, 2017; Epub April 1, 2017; Published April 15, 2017 Abstract: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sensitive to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often acquires resistance through secondary EGFR mutations, including the T790M mutation, aberrant c-Met receptor activity, or both. We assessed the ability of the highly selective c-Met inhibitor tepotinib to overcome EGFR TKI resistance in various xenograft models of NSCLC. In models with EGFR-activating mutations and low c-Met expression (patient explant-derived LU342, cell line PC-9), EGFR TKIs caused tumors to shrink, but growth resumed upon cessation of treatment. Tepotinib combined with EGFR TKIs delayed tumor regrowth, while tepotinib alone was ineffective. In patient explant-derived LU858, which has an EGFR-activating mutation and expresses high levels of c-Met/HGF, EGFR TKIs had no effect on tumor growth. Tepotinib combined with EGFR TKIs caused complete tumor regression and tepotinib alone caused tumor stasis. In cell line DFCI081 (activating EGFR mutation, c-Met amplification), EGFR TKIs were ineffective, whereas tepotinib alone induced com- plete tumor regression. Finally, in a ‘double resistant’ EGFR T790M-positive, high c-Met model (cell line HCC827-GR- T790M), the EGFR TKIs erlotinib, afatinib, and rociletinib, as well as tepotinib as a single agent or in combination with erlotinib or afatinib, slowed tumor growth, but only tepotinib in combination with rociletinib induced complete tumor regression.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 18, July 2020 Newsletter
    Issue 18: July 2020 (Covering Dec 2019-Apr 2020 news) Special Update: COVID-19 and IBC Research Program and Clinic Operations The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant effects on the operations of our program and clinic. Starting in mid-March 2020, research and administrative staff began working 100% remotely to limit the on-site footprint and ensure the wellbeing of employees and patients. Physicians came to the hospital for their clinics and inpatient rotations, but otherwise worked remotely on their normal responsibilities in patient-care, research and administration. Meetings were all switched to Zoom, and we all learned how to function as remote teams. Clinical research required substantial changes to normal practices. Patients already enrolled on clinical trials continued to see physicians and receive treatment, however, new enrollments to our entire research portfolio were halted for 2+ months. Some patients had to receive infusions locally rather than traveling ot MD Anderson. Gradually, as the institutional restrictions opened up, as of July 2, we have now begun screening and enrolling new patients on all active IBC clinical trials, mindful of the need to push forward with providing the best treatment choices for patients diagnosed with this aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Throughout the pandemic, new IBC patients were seen in the IBC Multi-Team clinic on Wednesdays, and local new patients were also seen by the medical oncologists if they did not fit the multi-team criteria. Second-opinion (previously treated) patients from out of state were unable to be seen during the early part of the pandemic, but as of now, these patients are being accommodated due to the Breast Center being approved as a strategic service line for the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrectinib in Patients with Advanced Or Metastatic NTRK Fusion-Positive
    ■ INFLUENTIAL PAPERS Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-282. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials Robert C Doebele, Alexander Drilon, Luis Paz-Ares, Salvatore Siena, Alice T Shaw, Anna F Farago, Collin M Blakely, Takashi Seto, Byung Chul Cho, Diego Tosi, Benjamin Besse, Sant P Chawla, Lyudmila Bazhenova, John C Krauss, Young Kwang Chae, MinalBarve, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Stephen V Liu, Paul Conkling, Thomas John, Marwan Fakih, Darren Sigal, Herbert H Loong, Gary L Buchschacher Jr, Pilar Garrido, Jorge Nieva, Conor Steuer, Tobias R Overbeck, Daniel W Bowles, Elizabeth Fox, Todd Riehl, Edna Chow-Maneval, Brian Simmons, Na Cui, Ann Johnson, Susan Eng, Timothy R Wilson, George D Demetri, trial investigators BACKGROUND: Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) A, B, and C, which has been shown to have anti-tumour activity against NTRK gene fusion-positive solid tumours, including CNS activity due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We present an integrated efficacy and safety analysis of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours harbouring oncogenic NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 gene fusions treated in three ongoing, early-phase trials. METHODS: An integrated database comprised the pivotal datasets of three, ongoing phase 1 or 2 clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2), which enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who received entrectinib orally at a dose of at least 600 mg once per day in a capsule.
    [Show full text]