DOCSLIB.ORG

Post-Translational Modifications by Sumo and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins; Role of Sumoylation on Sall Proteins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Post-Translational Modifications by Sumo and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins; Role of Sumoylation on Sall Proteins POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS BY SUMO AND UBIQUITIN-LIKE PROTEINS; ROLE OF SUMOYLATION ON SALL PROTEINS Lucia Pirone January 2016 (cc)2016 LUCIA PIRONE (cc by-nc 4.0) Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología Departamento de Genética, Antropología Física y Fisiología Animal POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS BY SUMO AND UBIQUITIN-LIKE PROTEINS; ROLE OF SUMOYLATION ON SALL PROTEINS Memoria presentada por Lucia Pirone Enero 2016 Este trabajo ha sido realizado en la unidad de Genómica Funcional del Centro de Investigación Cooperativa en Biociencias (CIC bioGUNE), financiado con una beca doctoral del proyecto UPStream: European Research Training in the Ubiquitin Proteasome System (Marie Curie Initial Training Network, ITN, FP7A-PEOPLE 2011-ITN) bajo la dirección de la Doctora María Rosa Barrio Olano INDEX ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 1 FIGURES & TABLES ....................................................................................................................... 5 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 9 RESUMEN ........................................................................................................................................ 10 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 11 1. Post-translational modifications ................................................................................................. 13 1.1. SUMOylation and SUMO proteins .................................................................................... 14 1.2. The SUMOylation pathway ............................................................................................... 14 1.3. SUMOylation consensus motifs versus SUMO interaction ............................................... 17 1.3.1. SUMO consensus motif .................................................................................................. 18 1.3.2. SUMO non-covalent interactions ................................................................................... 18 1.4. Strategies to study SUMO modification ............................................................................ 19 1.5. The SUMOylation process in Drosophila ......................................................................... 20 1.5.1. Drosophila melanogaster as a model system ................................................................. 20 1.5.2. SUMOylation pathway in Drosophila ............................................................................ 22 1.5.3. The role of SUMOylation in Drosophila ....................................................................... 22 1.6. UFM1 and the UFMylation pathway ................................................................................. 23 2. The SALL family of transcription factors ................................................................................. 24 2.1. SALL proteins in human health ......................................................................................... 27 2.2. Post-translational modification of SALL proteins ............................................................. 28 2.3. Role of SALL proteins during wing development in Drosophila ..................................... 29 2.3.1. Development of the wing imaginal disc ......................................................................... 30 2.3.2. SALL function during wing development ...................................................................... 31 II. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................. 33 III. HYPOTHESIS ........................................................................................................................... 37 IV. MATERIALS & METHODS ................................................................................................... 41 1. Generation of vectors ................................................................................................................... 43 2. Cell culture.................................................................................................................................... 46 2.1. Cell transfections................................................................................................................ 46 2.2. NeutrAvidin pulldown ....................................................................................................... 48 2.3. GFP-Trap co-pulldown ...................................................................................................... 48 2.4. Immunofluorescence in cultured cells ............................................................................... 49 3. Western blot .................................................................................................................................. 51 4. In vitro SUMOylation and SUBEs pulldown ............................................................................. 52 5. Proximity Ligation Assays ........................................................................................................... 53 6. Mass Spectrometry ....................................................................................................................... 53 7. Drosophila husbandry and stocks ............................................................................................... 54 7.1. Generation of transgenic flies ............................................................................................ 57 7.2. Isolation of bioSmt3 conjugates in vivo ............................................................................. 57 7.3. Analysis of adult wing phenotype ...................................................................................... 58 7.4. Immunohistochemistry ....................................................................................................... 60 8. Statistical analysis ........................................................................................................................ 60 V. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 61 PART I: ANALYSIS OF POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS BY UBIQUITIN- LIKES ................................................................................................................................................ 63 1. Identification of SUMOylated proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. ...................................... 63 1.1. New methodology for the isolation of SUMOylated proteins in Drosophila cells ............ 63 1.2. Localization of bioSmt3 in Drosophila cells ..................................................................... 66 1.3. SUMOylation of Ftz-f1 by bioSmt3................................................................................... 67 1.4. Isolation and identification of new bioSmt3 conjugates in Drosophila cultured cells ...... 69 1.5. Validation of bioSmt3 conjugates in Drosophila cultured cells............................................. 72 1.6. Isolation of bioSmt3 conjugates in vivo ............................................................................. 74 1.7. Localization of bioSmt3 conjugates in vivo ....................................................................... 76 1.8. Identification of bioSmt3 conjugates in vivo ...................................................................... 77 2. Development of bioUbiquitin-like (bioUbL) vectors for the analysis of post-translational modifications in mammalian cells ................................................................................................... 81 2.1. New methodology for the isolation of SUMOylated proteins in mammalian cells ........... 81 2.2. Isolation and identification of SUMO3 subproteome ........................................................ 81 2.3. New methodology for the isolation of proteins modified by other UbLs in mammalian cells ............................................................................................................................................ 83 2.4. Validation of the bioUFM1 system using a known target ................................................. 85 2.5. Isolation and identification of UFM1 conjugates ............................................................... 86 PART II: ANALYSIS OF THE SUMOYLATION OF SALL PROTEINS ............................... 89 1. SUMOylation and localization of human SALL1 ..................................................................... 89 1.1. Human SALL1 is SUMOylated in cultured cells............................................................... 89 1.2. SALL1 localizes in nuclear bodies in human cells ............................................................ 91 1.2.1. Human SALL1 partially colocalizes with SUMO proteins ............................................ 92 1.2.2. Human SALL1 interacts with SUMO proteins by PLA ................................................. 94 2. SUMOylation and localization of Drosophila Sall Proteins ..................................................... 96 2.1. SUMOylation of Drosophila Salm in mammalian cells .................................................... 97 2.2. Drosophila Salm localizes in nuclear bodies in cultured cells .........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of the Binding Partners for Hspb2 and Cryab Reveals
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2013-12-12 Identification of the Binding arP tners for HspB2 and CryAB Reveals Myofibril and Mitochondrial Protein Interactions and Non- Redundant Roles for Small Heat Shock Proteins Kelsey Murphey Langston Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Microbiology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Langston, Kelsey Murphey, "Identification of the Binding Partners for HspB2 and CryAB Reveals Myofibril and Mitochondrial Protein Interactions and Non-Redundant Roles for Small Heat Shock Proteins" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 3822. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3822 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Identification of the Binding Partners for HspB2 and CryAB Reveals Myofibril and Mitochondrial Protein Interactions and Non-Redundant Roles for Small Heat Shock Proteins Kelsey Langston A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Julianne H. Grose, Chair William R. McCleary Brian Poole Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Brigham Young University December 2013 Copyright © 2013 Kelsey Langston All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Identification of the Binding Partners for HspB2 and CryAB Reveals Myofibril and Mitochondrial Protein Interactors and Non-Redundant Roles for Small Heat Shock Proteins Kelsey Langston Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, BYU Master of Science Small Heat Shock Proteins (sHSP) are molecular chaperones that play protective roles in cell survival and have been shown to possess chaperone activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Propranolol-Mediated Attenuation of MMP-9 Excretion in Infants with Hemangiomas
    Supplementary Online Content Thaivalappil S, Bauman N, Saieg A, Movius E, Brown KJ, Preciado D. Propranolol-mediated attenuation of MMP-9 excretion in infants with hemangiomas. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4773 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/01/2021 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics Protein Name Prop 12 mo/4 Pred 12 mo/4 Δ Prop to Pred mo mo Myeloperoxidase OS=Homo sapiens GN=MPO 26.00 143.00 ‐117.00 Lactotransferrin OS=Homo sapiens GN=LTF 114.00 205.50 ‐91.50 Matrix metalloproteinase‐9 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MMP9 5.00 36.00 ‐31.00 Neutrophil elastase OS=Homo sapiens GN=ELANE 24.00 48.00 ‐24.00 Bleomycin hydrolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=BLMH 3.00 25.00 ‐22.00 CAP7_HUMAN Azurocidin OS=Homo sapiens GN=AZU1 PE=1 SV=3 4.00 26.00 ‐22.00 S10A8_HUMAN Protein S100‐A8 OS=Homo sapiens GN=S100A8 PE=1 14.67 30.50 ‐15.83 SV=1 IL1F9_HUMAN Interleukin‐1 family member 9 OS=Homo sapiens 1.00 15.00 ‐14.00 GN=IL1F9 PE=1 SV=1 MUC5B_HUMAN Mucin‐5B OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC5B PE=1 SV=3 2.00 14.00 ‐12.00 MUC4_HUMAN Mucin‐4 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC4 PE=1 SV=3 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 HRG_HUMAN Histidine‐rich glycoprotein OS=Homo sapiens GN=HRG 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 PE=1 SV=1 TKT_HUMAN Transketolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TKT PE=1 SV=3 17.00 28.00 ‐11.00 CATG_HUMAN Cathepsin G OS=Homo
    [Show full text]
  • A Cell Line P53 Mutation Type UM
    A Cell line p53 mutation Type UM-SCC 1 wt UM-SCC5 Exon 5, 157 GTC --> TTC Missense mutation by transversion (Valine --> Phenylalanine UM-SCC6 wt UM-SCC9 wt UM-SCC11A wt UM-SCC11B Exon 7, 242 TGC --> TCC Missense mutation by transversion (Cysteine --> Serine) UM-SCC22A Exon 6, 220 TAT --> TGT Missense mutation by transition (Tyrosine --> Cysteine) UM-SCC22B Exon 6, 220 TAT --> TGT Missense mutation by transition (Tyrosine --> Cysteine) UM-SCC38 Exon 5, 132 AAG --> AAT Missense mutation by transversion (Lysine --> Asparagine) UM-SCC46 Exon 8, 278 CCT --> CGT Missense mutation by transversion (Proline --> Alanine) B 1 Supplementary Methods Cell Lines and Cell Culture A panel of ten established HNSCC cell lines from the University of Michigan series (UM-SCC) was obtained from Dr. T. E. Carey at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. The UM-SCC cell lines were derived from eight patients with SCC of the upper aerodigestive tract (supplemental Table 1). Patient age at tumor diagnosis ranged from 37 to 72 years. The cell lines selected were obtained from patients with stage I-IV tumors, distributed among oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal sites. All the patients had aggressive disease, with early recurrence and death within two years of therapy. Cell lines established from single isolates of a patient specimen are designated by a numeric designation, and where isolates from two time points or anatomical sites were obtained, the designation includes an alphabetical suffix (i.e., "A" or "B"). The cell lines were maintained in Eagle's minimal essential media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Steroid-Dependent Regulation of the Oviduct: a Cross-Species Transcriptomal Analysis
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences Animal and Food Sciences 2015 Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis Katheryn L. Cerny University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cerny, Katheryn L., "Steroid-dependent regulation of the oviduct: A cross-species transcriptomal analysis" (2015). Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences. 49. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/animalsci_etds/49 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal and Food Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Animal and Food Sciences by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,824 B2 Ramseier Et Al
    USOO8603824B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,824 B2 Ramseier et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) PROCESS FOR IMPROVED PROTEIN 5,399,684 A 3, 1995 Davie et al. EXPRESSION BY STRAIN ENGINEERING 5,418, 155 A 5/1995 Cormier et al. 5,441,934 A 8/1995 Krapcho et al. (75) Inventors: Thomas M. Ramseier, Poway, CA 5,508,192 A * 4/1996 Georgiou et al. .......... 435/252.3 (US); Hongfan Jin, San Diego, CA 5,527,883 A 6/1996 Thompson et al. (US); Charles H. Squires, Poway, CA 5,558,862 A 9, 1996 Corbinet al. 5,559,015 A 9/1996 Capage et al. (US) 5,571,694 A 11/1996 Makoff et al. (73) Assignee: Pfenex, Inc., San Diego, CA (US) 5,595,898 A 1/1997 Robinson et al. 5,610,044 A 3, 1997 Lam et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,621,074 A 4/1997 Bjorn et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,622,846 A 4/1997 Kiener et al. 5,641,671 A 6/1997 Bos et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 471 days. 5,641,870 A 6/1997 Rinderknecht et al. 5,643,774 A 7/1997 Ligon et al. (21) Appl. No.: 11/189,375 5,662,898 A 9/1997 Ligon et al. (22) Filed: Jul. 26, 2005 5,677,127 A 10/1997 Hogan et al. 5,683,888 A 1 1/1997 Campbell (65) Prior Publication Data 5,686,282 A 11/1997 Lam et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Signaling Networks Alfred C
    REVIEW pubs.acs.org/CR Uncovering Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Signaling Networks Alfred C. O. Vertegaal* Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands CONTENTS 8. Crosstalk between Post-Translational Modifications 7934 1. Introduction 7923 8.1. Crosstalk between Phosphorylation and 1.1. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Proteins 7924 Ubiquitylation 7934 1.2. Quantitative Proteomics 7924 8.2. Phosphorylation-Dependent SUMOylation 7935 8.3. Competition between Different Lysine 1.3. Setting the Scenery: Mass Spectrometry Modifications 7935 Based Investigation of Phosphorylation 8.4. Crosstalk between SUMOylation and the and Acetylation 7925 UbiquitinÀProteasome System 7935 2. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Protein Purification 9. Conclusions and Future Perspectives 7935 Approaches 7925 Author Information 7935 2.1. Epitope-Tagged Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Biography 7935 Proteins 7925 Acknowledgment 7936 2.2. Traps Based on Ubiquitin- and Ubiquitin-like References 7936 Binding Domains 7926 2.3. Antibody-Based Purification of Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Proteins 7926 1. INTRODUCTION 2.4. Challenges and Pitfalls 7926 Proteomes are significantly more complex than genomes 2.5. Summary 7926 and transcriptomes due to protein processing and extensive 3. Ubiquitin Proteomics 7927 post-translational modification (PTM) of proteins. Hundreds ff fi 3.1. Proteomic Studies Employing Tagged of di erent modi cations exist. Release 66 of the RESID database1 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/RESID/) contains 559 dif- Ubiquitin 7927 ferent modifications, including small chemical modifications 3.2. Ubiquitin Binding Domains 7927 such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation and mod- 3.3. Anti-Ubiquitin Antibodies 7927 ification by small proteins, including ubiquitin and ubiquitin- 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for Hepg2 Experiments These Tables Show Details for All Gene Ontology Categories
    Supplementary Table 1: Association of Gene Ontology Categories with Decay Rate for HepG2 Experiments These tables show details for all Gene Ontology categories. Inferences for manual classification scheme shown at the bottom. Those categories used in Figure 1A are highlighted in bold. Standard Deviations are shown in parentheses. P-values less than 1E-20 are indicated with a "0". Rate r (hour^-1) Half-life < 2hr. Decay % GO Number Category Name Probe Sets Group Non-Group Distribution p-value In-Group Non-Group Representation p-value GO:0006350 transcription 1523 0.221 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.1 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006351 transcription, DNA-dependent 1498 0.220 (0.009) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 0 13.0 (0.4) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006355 regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent 1163 0.230 (0.011) 0.128 (0.002) FASTER 5.00E-21 14.2 (0.5) 4.6 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006366 transcription from Pol II promoter 845 0.225 (0.012) 0.130 (0.002) FASTER 1.88E-14 13.0 (0.5) 4.8 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006139 nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism3004 0.173 (0.006) 0.127 (0.002) FASTER 1.28E-12 8.4 (0.2) 4.5 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0006357 regulation of transcription from Pol II promoter 487 0.231 (0.016) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 6.05E-10 13.5 (0.6) 4.9 (0.1) OVER 0 GO:0008283 cell proliferation 625 0.189 (0.014) 0.132 (0.002) FASTER 1.95E-05 10.1 (0.6) 5.0 (0.1) OVER 1.50E-20 GO:0006513 monoubiquitination 36 0.305 (0.049) 0.134 (0.002) FASTER 2.69E-04 25.4 (4.4) 5.1 (0.1) OVER 2.04E-06 GO:0007050 cell cycle arrest 57 0.311 (0.054) 0.133 (0.002)
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • 1714 Gene Comprehensive Cancer Panel Enriched for Clinically Actionable Genes with Additional Biologically Relevant Genes 400-500X Average Coverage on Tumor
    xO GENE PANEL 1714 gene comprehensive cancer panel enriched for clinically actionable genes with additional biologically relevant genes 400-500x average coverage on tumor Genes A-C Genes D-F Genes G-I Genes J-L AATK ATAD2B BTG1 CDH7 CREM DACH1 EPHA1 FES G6PC3 HGF IL18RAP JADE1 LMO1 ABCA1 ATF1 BTG2 CDK1 CRHR1 DACH2 EPHA2 FEV G6PD HIF1A IL1R1 JAK1 LMO2 ABCB1 ATM BTG3 CDK10 CRK DAXX EPHA3 FGF1 GAB1 HIF1AN IL1R2 JAK2 LMO7 ABCB11 ATR BTK CDK11A CRKL DBH EPHA4 FGF10 GAB2 HIST1H1E IL1RAP JAK3 LMTK2 ABCB4 ATRX BTRC CDK11B CRLF2 DCC EPHA5 FGF11 GABPA HIST1H3B IL20RA JARID2 LMTK3 ABCC1 AURKA BUB1 CDK12 CRTC1 DCUN1D1 EPHA6 FGF12 GALNT12 HIST1H4E IL20RB JAZF1 LPHN2 ABCC2 AURKB BUB1B CDK13 CRTC2 DCUN1D2 EPHA7 FGF13 GATA1 HLA-A IL21R JMJD1C LPHN3 ABCG1 AURKC BUB3 CDK14 CRTC3 DDB2 EPHA8 FGF14 GATA2 HLA-B IL22RA1 JMJD4 LPP ABCG2 AXIN1 C11orf30 CDK15 CSF1 DDIT3 EPHB1 FGF16 GATA3 HLF IL22RA2 JMJD6 LRP1B ABI1 AXIN2 CACNA1C CDK16 CSF1R DDR1 EPHB2 FGF17 GATA5 HLTF IL23R JMJD7 LRP5 ABL1 AXL CACNA1S CDK17 CSF2RA DDR2 EPHB3 FGF18 GATA6 HMGA1 IL2RA JMJD8 LRP6 ABL2 B2M CACNB2 CDK18 CSF2RB DDX3X EPHB4 FGF19 GDNF HMGA2 IL2RB JUN LRRK2 ACE BABAM1 CADM2 CDK19 CSF3R DDX5 EPHB6 FGF2 GFI1 HMGCR IL2RG JUNB LSM1 ACSL6 BACH1 CALR CDK2 CSK DDX6 EPOR FGF20 GFI1B HNF1A IL3 JUND LTK ACTA2 BACH2 CAMTA1 CDK20 CSNK1D DEK ERBB2 FGF21 GFRA4 HNF1B IL3RA JUP LYL1 ACTC1 BAG4 CAPRIN2 CDK3 CSNK1E DHFR ERBB3 FGF22 GGCX HNRNPA3 IL4R KAT2A LYN ACVR1 BAI3 CARD10 CDK4 CTCF DHH ERBB4 FGF23 GHR HOXA10 IL5RA KAT2B LZTR1 ACVR1B BAP1 CARD11 CDK5 CTCFL DIAPH1 ERCC1 FGF3 GID4 HOXA11 IL6R KAT5 ACVR2A
    [Show full text]
  • Placenta-Derived Exosomes Continuously Increase in Maternal
    Sarker et al. Journal of Translational Medicine 2014, 12:204 http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/12/1/204 RESEARCH Open Access Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over the first trimester of pregnancy Suchismita Sarker1, Katherin Scholz-Romero1, Alejandra Perez2, Sebastian E Illanes1,2,3, Murray D Mitchell1, Gregory E Rice1,2 and Carlos Salomon1,2* Abstract Background: Human placenta releases specific nanovesicles (i.e. exosomes) into the maternal circulation during pregnancy, however, the presence of placenta-derived exosomes in maternal blood during early pregnancy remains to be established. The aim of this study was to characterise gestational age related changes in the concentration of placenta-derived exosomes during the first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. from 6 to 12 weeks) in plasma from women with normal pregnancies. Methods: A time-series experimental design was used to establish pregnancy-associated changes in maternal plasma exosome concentrations during the first trimester. A series of plasma were collected from normal healthy women (10 patients) at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks of gestation (n = 70). We measured the stability of these vesicles by quantifying and observing their protein and miRNA contents after the freeze/thawing processes. Exosomes were isolated by differential and buoyant density centrifugation using a sucrose continuous gradient and characterised by their size distribution and morphology using the nanoparticles tracking analysis (NTA; Nanosight™) and electron microscopy (EM), respectively. The total number of exosomes and placenta-derived exosomes were determined by quantifying the immunoreactive exosomal marker, CD63 and a placenta-specific marker (Placental Alkaline Phosphatase PLAP).
    [Show full text]