Post-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report Assessment Scheme Post-Consultation Lower Thames Crossing Thames Lower Volume 6: Environmental Appraisal Environmental Volume 6: Lower Thames Crossing |2017 Section 10:Section Appendices

Volume 6 POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Contents

Title Appendix 6.1 Environmental Drawings Appendix 6.2 Engagement with Environmental Bodies Appendix 6.3 Air Quality Results

i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Appendix 6.1 - Environmental Drawings

Drawing reference Description 1 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Landscape/ Townscape Constraints

2 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Biodiversity, Historic Environment and Planning Constraints

3 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Internationally Designated Sites

4 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Air and Noise Constraints and Air Quality Modelling Receptor Locations 5 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005 Community Land Use Constraints 6 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0006 Public Rights of Way and Cycle Routes 7 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 Route 1 Bridge Land Take High Level Constraints 8 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 Route 1 Bridge Land Take Water Constraints 9 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints 10 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 3 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints 11 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take High Level Constraints 12 HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 Route 4 Bored Tunnel Land Take Water Constraints

i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED A12(T) ¯ Route Alignments A129!( Junction

Constraints A12 A176 Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (National value) A127 M25 BRENTWOOD Green Belt (Regional value) A128 COUNTY A118 District Boundary DISTRICT A1235 A127 County Boundary BASILDON A132 A127 Route 4 DISTRICT A127 !( B148 A1321 !( (! B1036 B1464

A124 A13 A176 HAVERING B187

LONDON M25 B186 BORO B1007 A13

B1421 B1420 (!!( A128

A1014 A1014

A13 A1013 B188 (!!( M25 B1335 A13(T) A1306 Route 3 B1335 (!!( (!!( !( A13(T) A13(T) A1306 A1013 A1012 !( A1089(T) B186 B149 A126 A126 A126(T) A126 B189 A1090

Route 1

A1089 A206

!( A206 B255 A2026 B3228 B256 B2175 A226 A226 A226 A226 A2018 B2174 B2500 B2174 !( A296 A2260 B261 A226 DARTFORD A2(T) Western !( Eastern A2(T) A225 DISTRICT Southern B2000 B258 !( B255 Southern Link Link A227 KENT A2(T) B262 COUNTY A226 A289 M25 B2108 (!!( GRAVESHAM A2(T) B260 DISTRICT (!!( A2(T) A2

A228 A225 MEDWAY

SEVENOAKS A227 DISTRICT A228 M2 A20 M20

A225 0 1 2 Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project © Natural England copyright 2016. LOWER THAMES S5 P02 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database Scale 1:75,000 Date - rights 2016 Ordnance Survey CROSSING 08/08/16 100030649 Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME

Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Landscape / Townscape HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Constraints Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 scheme development. Path: C:\Users\lha76846\OneDriveARCADIS\LTC\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001.mxd - Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd BRENTWOOD

DISTRICT A176 !( Junction ¯ Route Alignments A1023 District Boundary A128 A12(T) County Boundary

Major Planned Development Basildon Havering M25 A129 A176 Bexley Maidstone Brentwood Medway A12 Dartford Thurrock

Residential Gravesham Tonbridge and Malling - Consented Residential A127 Residential - Ecological Constraints - Consented Not Determined Ramsar (International value) Residential A118 Residential with commercial - Consented A176 Special Area of ConservationA1235 floorspace and Residential (International value) associated works Demolition and A127 with commercial HAVERING - Not Consented redevelopment Special Protection Area floorspace and for new office, (International value) associated works Residential with warehouse and B148 LONDON Residential - Not Consented retail and community shed - Consented Ancient Woodland !( - Consented hall - Consented A127 Residential(National with value) A1321 BORO BASILDON retail Siteand leisureof Special Scientific - Consented A132 Route 4 Interest (National value) (!!( DISTRICT A176Recommended Marine A128 Conservation Zone (National value) Solar PV Demolition and Demolition and residential, primary Duck farm and system - residential, primary Local Nature Reserve (Local value) Solar Park school, retail and anaerobic digestion Consented school, retail Extension to club - Consented associatedLocal Wildlife works Site (Local value) plant - Not consented and associated works house and new - Consented - Consented Public Open Spacedriving (Barking range & Dagenham)B1464 - Consented A124 Cultural Heritage Constraints Thames M25 Grade I Listed Building (National value) A13 Estuary B187 Solar park - Refused Grade II* Listed Building (National value) Thames Grade II Listed Building Estuary B1007 (Regional value) B186 Mixed use residential, retail andScheduled community Monument Residential (National value) - Not use - Not determined Determined Former Gateway at Solar Registered Parks and Garden Thames Groves Barns Park - EIA (National value) Estuary Screening Mixed use residential, B1421 Conservation Area retail and(National community - Local value) Roman barrow 260m use - Not determined north east of South Mixed use residential, A13 Local Historic Landscape EIA Screening !( Ockendon Hall retail and community (! Gatehouse and (Local value) Opinion Solar Farm moat of South Ockenden use - Not determined - Not determined B1420 Old Hall M25 Landscape and Visual Amenity Woodland, recreation Constraints and amenity use A128 - Not determined Area of Outstanding Natural Springfield style New country Beauty (National value) park - Not enclosure and Iron Age enclosures B188 Sand and gravel determined south of Hill House, extraction - Solar farm Bishop Bonner's Residential A1014 Baker Street. - Consented Consented - Consented Palace, Wind Residential - London Gateway turbines - Residential EIA Screening Logistics Park electrical Consented - Consented infrastructure - Consented A1306 Residential including B1335 Sand and gravel !( community use and doctors extraction - A13 (! surgery - Consented Consented Processing A1013 plant - New secondary Causewayed enclosure Refused school - Demolition and Recycling and Anglo-Saxon Consented A13(T) residential development Redevelopment B1335 centre - cemetery 500m ENE Redevelopment - Consented for residential Crop mark Consented Ecology of Heath Place for emploment use - Consented complex, Orsett (!!( park - Thames use - Consented !( Consented Estuary (!!( Residential including doctor's Residential surgery - Consented Demolition andTHURROCK redevelopment Route 3 and floorspace for residential use for community A13(T) - Consented A1013 Shopping centre A1089(T) and health use - A1306 Status Unknown Residential extension and associated works - Not Determined Time limit extension - Refused for residential Residential South Thames !( B149 development - Consented B186 A1012 - Consented Estuary and Marshes Shopping centre !( Residential - Second World War extension and associated Not consented anti-aircraft battery works - Not Determined A126(T) Solar at Bowaters Farm Expansion of A126 Solar farm port facilities farm - Not - Consented Solar East - EIA Scoping determined Demolition and Lagoon & B189 farm - Solar farm - Battery Thames redevelopment A1090 Marshes Consented fo strategic rail Redevelopment Not determined Earthworks near Estuary & for storage and church, West Marshes freight interchange - Residential Not Determined distribution uses Route 1 Tilbury and associated - Consented Residential, including works - Consented health centre and Details for commercial floorspace redevelopment - Not determined for employment Leachate and mixed uses disposal plant - Consented - Not Consented A1089 Import of Hotel - materials - Residential A206 Consented Leisure Consented Industrial - Consented Residential resort - Not battery and use - - Consented A2026 Consented Consented artillery defences !( A206 Residential B3228 Residential Tilbury - Consented Residential Fort Residential - Consented Material - Consented Mixed use including- Consented importation - residential, Not Consented retail office use Thames - Not determined Residential B2174 B2175 Estuary & A2018 - Consented Marshes A226 Residential - Business / Residential Extension and Not Consented B2174 industrial, storage Mixed use including - Consented A226 alterations to shopping and distribution - residential, business, Security ditch Redevelopment centre - Not Determined Residential !( Remediation - Consented including new Consented A296 community and retail and non-residential works - academy building facilities - Consented floorspace including B261 Consented Church Of and sports centre education and community - Consented A226 St Mary Crematorium, cemetery A2(T) facilities - Consented Residential and memorial gardens - A2(T) - Consented Consented !( A2(T) !( GRAVESHAM Eastern Southern B255 Residential Link B258 A225 - Not Consented DISTRICT Memorial Park B262 - Consented A227 Western Southern Link DARTFORD A2(T) Residential - Not Consented Solar Farm DISTRICT - Not Consented A226 A289 New school building and M25 associated development - Consented (!!( A2(T) Bowl barrow B2108 B260 in Ashenbank Wood Cobham !( south of Cobham Hall (! A2 Park reservoir

Residential A225 - Consented M2 Residential - A227 EIA Screening

A228 A20 M20

0 1 2 A225 Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project S5 © English Heritage 2016. LOWER THAMES P02 © Natural England 2016. Contains Ordnance Survey data CROSSING Scale 1:75,000 Date - 08/08/16 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME 100030649 Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Biodiversity, Historic Environment HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 and Planning Constraints Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 scheme development. Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-LowerThames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\EnvironmentalRev Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002.mxd Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd ¯

Essex Estuaries (SAC)

Blackwater Estuary (Mid-Essex Coast Phase 4) (SPA)

Lee Valley (SPA) Blackwater Estuary (Mid-Essex Coast Phase 4) (Ramsar) Lee Valley (Ramsar)

Lee Valley Foulness (Mid-Essex (SPA) Coast Phase 5) (Ramsar) Crouch & Roach Estuaries Lee (Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3) Valley (Ramsar) Foulness (Mid-Essex (Ramsar) Coast Phase 5) (SPA)

Epping Forest (SAC) Crouch & Roach Estuaries (Mid-Essex Coast Phase 3) (SPA)

Lee Valley Holehaven (SPA) !( Route 4 Benfleet and !( Creek Southend Marshes (pSPA) Lee Valley (SPA) (Ramsar)

!( & Marshes (SPA) Route 3 Benfleet and !( Southend Marshes !( !( !( (Ramsar) !( Route 1

Thames Estuary !( & Marshes !( (Ramsar) !( Western Southern !( Eastern Southern The Swale Link Link (Ramsar) !( !( North Downs Woodlands (SAC) Medway Estuary & Marshes Medway Estuary & (SPA) Marshes (Ramsar)

The Peters Pit Swale Queendown (SAC) (SPA) Warren (SAC) Outer Thames Estuary (SPA) North Downs Woodlands (SAC)

Route Alignments !( Junction 30km buffer around study area Ramsar (International value) Special Area of Conservation (International value) Special Protection Area (International value) Proposed Special Protection Area 0 4 8 12 16 (International value) Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project © Natural England copyright 2016. LOWER THAMES S5 P02 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database Scale 1:350,000 Date - rights 2016 Ordnance Survey CROSSING 08/08/16 100030649 Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME

Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Internationally HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Designated Sites Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003 scheme development. Path: C:\Users\lha76846\OneDriveARCADIS\LTC\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0003.mxd - Rev Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd !(!( !( BoundDistrict a ry R76 !( ¯ XW CountyBoundA129 a ry Air Quality Features A12 ESSEX A176 XW QualityAir Mo d ellingRec eptors " !( ) Add itionaQualityAir l Mo A127 d ellingRec eptors M25 COUNTY !( Nitrogendioxide diffusion tube A118 A128 c o nc entrationlesstha µg/m n36 3 !( !( A1235 BRENTWOOD A127 Nitrogendioxide diffusion tube !( 3 R85 c o nc entrationµg/m–4036 A132 DISTRICT A127 XW !( Nitrogendioxide diffusion tube !( !( Route4 3 A127 R35 B148 c o nc entrationgrea tha µg/m ter n40 A1321 HAVERING !( !( XW #* Nitrogen!(dioxide autom amo tic nitoring LONDON BORO c o nc entrationgrea tha µg/m ter n40 3 (!!( B1036 A176 #* Nitrogendioxide autom amo tic nitoring BASILDON c o nc entrationlesstha µg/m n36 3 B1464 !( Note:Alldiffusion tubeand autom amo tic nitoringda ta !( R33 DISTRICT fromis 2014forall sites XW A13 A124 Air Quality Constraints !( B187 Defra'sNationa Pollution l Clima te M a pping(PCM mo ) d elnetwo rk R48 M25 BasildoCounc nDistrict QualityAir il B186 XW B1007 M a na gem entArea (AQM A)

DartfordA13Borough Counc AQM il A R34 Gravesha mBorough Counc AQM il A B1421 XW !( Lond o nB1420Borough ofBexley AQM A (!!( A128 Lond o nBorough ofHavering AQM A R73 M ed wa yCounc AQM il A R32 XW XW!( Seveno aCounc ksDistrict AQM il A T hurroc kCounc AQM il A A1014 Noise ConstraintsA1014 !( #* A1013 #* NoiseImportant Area !( !( R74 !( B188 XW A13 XW M25 XW (!!( THURROCK R38 R37 XW XWR46 R31 XW R88 B1335 !( XW R75 !( A282 XW !( M25 R29 XW A1306 Route3 R1 B1335 A13(T)XW !( R2 XW R30 (! XW R81 !(!( R3 !( XWR4 R24 !( Co XW !( R28 XW R50 ttonL (! !( !( R5 XW a A1012 R86 n A13(T) !( e XW !( XW A1013 XW XW XW !( !( !( R6 !(!( R49 R100 A1306 )" )" R7 XW !( R103 R82 R25 XW XW !( XW )" R101 XW !( R27XWR26 !( !( XWR23 !( XW B186 A1089(T) !( R8 !( !( B149 R52 R51 XW R9 !( !( A126 !(!( XW XW #*!( A126 !( XW !( )"!( XW R102 R10 !( !( #* R87 A126 " !( R104 ) R11XWXW B189 A1090 !( !( !(!( !( R12 !( XWXWR13 Route1 !( !( !(!( !(!(#*!( !( R14 !( XW R15 XW Wa R47 A1089 tling Stre A206 !( et !( R46XW !( !( XW!( R1 R16 R22 R2XWXW!(XWR4 A206 R18 B255 !( A2026 XW!( XW !( XW !( XWXW XW#* !( !(R41 !( XW B3228 !( !( XW!( !( !( XW B2175 !(#*!( !(!( !( XWXW R17 R19 !( !( !( A226 A226 !( R21 !( !( !( !( XWXW!(!(!(!( A226 !( !( !( A226 !( !( )"!(!(R105!( A2018 !( !( !( XW #* !( !( XW !(!(!( !( !(XWXW B2174 !( XWXW !( !( !( B261 !( A2260 !(!( A226 B2174 !(!(!( !( !( XW !( !( !(!( !( !( DARTFORD R36XW!( !( R106 )" R109 !( A296 !( #*!( R39 )" XW !( XW DISTRICT !(XW A2(T) !( XW R40 R20 Eastern !( R45 !( A2(T) W estern !( !(!( A225 XWR42 !( !( !( R44 Southern !( !( XW!(#*!( Southern B258 B255 !( XW B2000 R62 Link B262 A227 Link R43 R107 )" XW!( XW!( A2(T) R83 )" !( XW R108 R53 KENT R54 A226 XW COUNTY !( XWR89 A289 M25 XW B2108 R67 (!!( R55 A2(T) R68 XW B260 (!!( A2 XW !(!(!( !( R56 A225 XW GRAVESHAM DISTRICT !( R61 !(XW R63 !( XW A227 A228 M20 A20 M2 R70 XW

R64 !(!( A225 XW 0 1 2 Kilom etres Copyright Status Revision Client Projec t ©Crown co pyrightand da tab a serightslicensed LOW ERTHAM ES S5 P02 undDefra's erPublic Sec Ma tor ppingAgreem ent withOrdna nc eSurvey (licenc eNo.100022861) Sca le 1:75,000 Date- 08/08/16 a ndtheLand and Property Services Department CROSSING (NorthernIreland MOU ) 206. DrawingTitle DrawnBy L.HU LM E ContainsOrdna nc eSurvey da ©Crown ta c o pyrightand da tab a serights2016Ordna nc e Chec kedBy S.RIMELL Survey100030649 ApprovedBy A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Air andAir Noise Constraints ProjecNo. t HA PIN Origina| tor BurderopPark OriginaSize l Swind oSN4 n, 0QD a ndQualityAir Mo d elling HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE T812479+44(0)1793 el. | | | | Drawing Numb er | P02 S5 08/08/16 PostCo nsultationSAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN Rec eptorLoc a tions

P01 S5 18/01/16 SARISSU E LH SR AS T hedesign sho wnon these drawings illustrativeis a ndma ybe subjec chato t ngeinlaterstages ofthe HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004

ah :UArjct\ 078-oe h sCosn\-ac\I\niometlPann\x \SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004.mxd Planning\mxd ental Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environm Tha m es A007080-Lower ts\U Aprojec K:\U Path: Rev Status Rev.Date Purposeofrevision Drawn Chc k'd Apprv'd schem edevelopment. B1 85 A176 Route Alignments

A1023 ¯ A12(T) !( Junction ! Community Facilities Point A128 Community Land A129 ESSEX Use Facilities A176 M25 COUNTY Country Park A12 Residential including potential health facility BASILDON BRENTWOOD The Old Park DISTRICT Parks, Open Spaces DISTRICT A127and Golf Courses South Essex Golf Course A118 A176 WoodlandA1235 Woodlands A127 Prep School Woodland TrustResidential Site with A127 retail and community Warley hall - Consented Travelodge Residential with A127 Codham Hall Wood (! All Saints Hotel B1 48 retail and RSPB Reserve Hall Wood Church A1321 A132 leisure - Consented B1 86 Route 4 Residential including Open Access Land !((! hotel and retail uses Sports Club Dunton Hills B1 036 A176 St Peter's Family Golf Church of Centre Demolition and District Boundary England residential, primary school, retail and associated works - ConsentedCounty Boundary

Demolition and B1 464 A124 residential, primary Dunton school, retail A13 B1 87 South HAVERING Plotlands and associated Thames works - Consented Cranham Essex Chase LONDON BORO Golf Course Forest Marshes

B1 007

A13 Mixed use residential, B1 86 retail and community use - Not determinedB1 420

B1 421 Golf and Country Club Hotel St Mary Magdalene the Parish Top Meadow !((! Church of North Ockendon Golf Club

Woodland, recreation and amenity use A128 - Not determined Orsett Fen THURROCK Brick Kiln Wood, Running Water Wood A1014 and Whitehall Wood New country A1014 park - Not determined

Oakwood B1 88 Residential including Belhus and Ash Chase community use and doctors Plantation surgery - Consented M25 (! A13 !( Gurnett's Davy Down Dilkes Fields Riverside Park Golf A1013 St Cleres Park Belhus Park Hall Golf Club Club South Golf Club Dilkes Wood A1306 Essex Secondary School A13(T) Marshes and Learning Centre New secondary Primary A1089(T) B1 335 school - Consented School Hangman's Wood William Orsett Aveley Christian Edwards Academy Golf Course School (! Centre Mardyke Woods Park Inn at !( A13(T) Fields Radisson Treetops St Mary's Linford Broom of Peace A1013 School (! Thurrock Thameside Rainham !((! A13(T) Church Wood Hill Hangmans Woodside Old Nature Park Marshes St Michael's Arena Essex Recreation A1306 Wood Primary House Church Raceway Terrels Heath Wood Ground Caravan Park School Route 3 Lakeside Karting St Marys Residential including Cemetery Thurrock A1012 public open space Football Chafford Ground Bushy Premier Inn Gorges Palmer's Residential - (! Nature Park Consented Bit Lakeside Retail College Residential including community Park B1 49 and health facilities ! Chadwell St ( Mary Day Nursery Riverview Methodist Church Condover's Scout A126 A126 A126(T) A1090 The Gateway Activity Camp BEXLEY Academy B1 89 Residential, including Tilbury LONDON health centre and Football Riding commercial floorspace Ground School Manor Infant BORO - Not determined and Nursery Cliffe School Pools A126 Tilbury Manor Route 1 Littlebrook Nature Koala Junior School Park Park Details for Leisure resort Dartford Bridge redevelopment Community for employment Primary School and mixed uses A1089 - Consented Leisure resort Joyce Green - Not Consented A206 Cemetery

B2 186 (! A206 B2 55 A2026 Holiday Shorne Inn B3 228 Marshes A226 A226 A226 A226 B2 56 The Winning B2 175 A2018 Child Nursery B2 174 B2 500 Mixed use including residential, business, B2 174 (! A296 community and retail A2260 Church of facilities - Consented St Mary GRAVESHAM Winners Chapel B2 61 A226 International Thames The Leigh DISTRICT Valley Golf Academy A2(T) Centre Driving Range A2(T) Redevelopment Dartford A2(T) ! Memorial Park, Ambulance ( Chalk including new A225 Shorne academy building A2(T) Station Methodist Crematorium, and sports centre (! Church cemetery and memorial DARTFORD - Consented gardens - Not determined Mixed use including residential, KENT A227 DISTRICT community and health uses. Shorne C of B2 58 E Primary School B2 62 COUNTY B2 55 A2(T) M25 Western Southern Eastern Southern Link The Link Warren Mackenzie Way A289 Open Southern Valley Cole Wood A226 Space Golf Club Starmore Wood Great Crabbles Claylane (! Wood Wood !( Puckle A2(T) Hill B2 108

B2 60 A2(T) !((! A2 Ashenbank Wood

A225 M25 M2

Rochester and Cobham Park SEVENOAKS A227 Golf Club MEDWAY B2 173 DISTRICT A228 A20 M20

A225 0 1 2 Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project © Natural England copyright 2016. LOWER THAMES S5 P02 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey CROSSING Scale 1:75,000 Date - 08/08/16 100030649. Data reproduced with the permission of RSPB. Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME © Crown Copyright. Ordnance Survey licence number 100021787 2016 Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Community Land Use Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Constraints HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005 scheme development. Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-LowerThames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\EnvironmentalRev Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-ZZZZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0005.mxd Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd

¯

M25

OakWood Mardyke BelhusPark East Cat’sMede Valley Belhus Park Little DilkesLittle Wood Millard'sGarden/ Aveley LowWell Wood Brannett’sWood Sheepfold Wood ParkCornerHouse HangmWood a n's BrickbWood a rn Smoatedof ite ma house nor E of St MichaStofE Church, el's Aveley

S aMicha int el's Church A13 Aveley Hall W aGorge rren Ma rdyke LWS ArenaEssex ClockhouseCliff Grays Thurrock Chalk Pit Lakeside WWood a tt’s Shopping Centre

Purfleet Chalk Pits West Thurrock GRAYS

WThurrock est West Thurrock R eedb ed Lagoon & Marshes

Thames River Estuary Thames

Queen Eliza b ethII Bridge

A282

Land Take Perma nent Major Planned Development Stone SWANSCOMBE DevelopmBounda ent ry Ecological Constraints New FunctionalHab (Internationalva itat lue) Town AncientWoodland (Nationalva lue) MortuaCha ry pelin W a tlingStreetCem etery SSpecialof ite Scientific Interest (National Interest va lue) Bluewater R ecom m endedMa rine ConservaZone tion (National va lue) LocaNature l Reserve (Loca va l lue) LocaWildlife l Site (Loca va l lue) DARTFORD Fleet Cultural Heritage Constraints Downs GradeListed BuildingI (Na tionalva lue)

G rade II* ListedGrade Building II* Anglo-Sa xoncem etery (Na tionalva lue) a t Darentha t Park GradeListed Building II (Regionalva lue)

S cheduledMonum ent (Na tionalva lue)

R egisteredParks and Ga rden (Na tionalva lue)

0 1 2 ConservaArea tion (NaLoca tional - va l lue) K ilom etres Copyright S tatus R evision Client Project ©English Heritage 2016. LOW ERTHAMES S 5 P02 ©Natural England 2016. ContainsOrdnance Survey da ©Crown ta S ca le Date- copyrightand da tab a serights2016 CR OS S ING 1:35,000 08/08/16 OrdnanceSurvey 100030649 DrawingTitle DrawnBy L.HULME

CheckedBy S .RIMELL ApprovedBy A.SAUNDER S Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture R outeBridge1 ProjectNo. HA PIN Originator| BurderopPark OriginalSize S windon,SN4 0QD LandTa ke HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE T812479+44(0)1793 el. | | | | Drawing Num b er | P02 S 5 08/08/16 ConsultationPost SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN HighLevel Constraints

P01 S 5 18/01/16 S ARISS U E LH SR AS T hedesign shown theseon drawings illustrativeis a ndma ybe sub cha jectto ngelaterstagesin theof HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZ Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0003 ah :UArjcsUA000LwrTame rsigDC c\I\niometlPann\ dSA H503-H-G-DZ Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0003.mxd xd\S AR \HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZ Planning\m ental lcs\GIS\Environm Crossing\D-Ca Tha m es A007080-Lower K:\U Aprojects\U Path: R ev S tatus R ev.Date Purposerevisionof Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd schem edevelopm ent. ¯

River Mardyke

West Thurrock Marshes West Thurrock Main Sewer

Littlebrook Nature Park River Thames Stone Marshes Recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ)

Land Take Permanent

Water Constraints Detailed river network

Flood defence

WFD river waterbodies Cycle2 (Draft)

Area benefitting from flood defences

Authorised landfill site

Historic landfill site

WFD - Transitional waterbodies

Source Protection Zones

Zone I - Inner protection zone

Zone II - Outer protection zone 0 1 2 Kilometres Zone III - Total catchment Copyright Status Revision Client Project © Environment Agency copyright 2016. LOWER THAMES S5 P02 Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 CROSSING Scale 1:30,000 Date - 08/08/16 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME

Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Route 1 Bridge Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Land Take HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Water Constraints Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004 scheme development. Path:K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Rev Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-AD0ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0004.mxd Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd ¯

Bulphan

M25

North Ockendon

FormerGateway at GrovesBarns

R omanbarrow 260m northeast Southof Ock endonHall MoatBridge and GatehouseatSouth THURROCK Churchof Ock endonHall SNicholas t Gatehouseand Bishop moatSouthof Bonners Ock endenOldHall Palace Poplars Farm South Ockendon Orsett OrsettHouse MurrellsCottages Crop markCrop S pringfieldstyle complex, enclosureand Orsett Age enclosuresIron Causewayedenclosure southHouse, Hill of andAnglo-Saxon cemetery 500mENE Heathof Place A13 BakStreet. er

W hitecroftsFarm Muck ing Black shots Heath NatureArea Linford Pit T hatchedCottage HeathPlace A1089 Thames 1&2Grays Corner Estuary & Cottages Marshes R ainbow Terrels S haw Dene Heath holesin Churchof SMary, tChadwell Hangman'sWood Chadwell W estTilbury EastTilbury GRAYS Marshall’s Cottages East Chadwell Tilbury St Mary Earthworks nearchurch, S econdWorldWar W estTilbury LowStreet anti-aircraftbattery Pit atBowaters Farm

Buck land West Mucking Tilbury Flats and Marshes Churchof CliffeFort SJames t LytagBrownfield CoalhouseFort batteryand artillery TILBURY defences T ilburyMarshes GoshemsFarm

T ilbury Land Take PowerStation

NorthernPermanent Landtak e T ilburyFort

S ub-soilLandtak e

Thames ESLPermanent Landtak e Estuary S hornemeadFort

W SPermanent L Landtak e South Thames Estuary and Major Planned Development Thames Marshes Estuary & DevelopmentBoundary Canaland Grazing Marshes MarshHigham Ecological Constraints GRAVESEND S outhernLink FunctionalHabitat (International value) Alternativescut line R amsar(International value) Filborough Farmhouse S pecialProtection Area GranaryatLittle (Internationalvalue) Cascades Chalk FilboroughFarm LeisureCentre EastCourt AncientWoodland Farmhouse (Nationalvalue) Lower Shorne S outhernValley Churchof S iteSpecialof Scientific W estern CourseGolf SMary t Eastern Interest(National value) S outhernLink LittleSt Katherine's S outhern R ecommendedMarine PipesPlace ConservationZone (National value) Link SKatherine's t House LocalNature Reserve (Localvalue) Riverview Park ChapelStof Katherine LocalWildlife Site (Localvalue) T hong W hiteHorse S hornePasture

Cultural Heritage Constraints Cottage CourtWood A2 S horneVillage GradeListed I Building Claylane Shorne Wood Churchof (Nationalvalue) SPeter t and St Paul Starmore Peartree Shorne Wood Bushylees Wood GradeListed II* Building CottageW ell (Nationalvalue) Shorne Ridgeway Thong and Ashenbank Great Crabbles Wood Woods GradeListed II Building A289 (Regionalvalue) S horneWoods ChestnutGreen CountryPark S cheduledMonument (Nationalvalue) Cobham Hall R egisteredParks and Garden Great (Nationalvalue) Kent Downs Wood

ConservationArea (NationalLocalvalue) - Cobham Woods Churchof Landscape and Visual Amenity SMary t Magdelene Constraints AreaOutstandingof Natural Beauty(National value) 0 1 2 Kilometres Copyright S tatus R evision Client Project ©English Heritage 2016. LOW ERTHAMES S 5 P02 ©Natural England 2016. ContainsOrdnance Survey data ©Crown S cale Date- copyrightand database rights 2016 CR OS S ING 1:55,000 08/08/16 OrdnanceSurvey 100030649 DrawingTitle DrawnBy L.HULME

Check edBy S .RIMELL ApprovedBy A.SAUNDER S Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture R outeBored3 Tunnel ProjectNo. HA PIN Originator| BurderopPark OriginalSize S windon,SN4 0Q D LandTak e HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE 812479+44(0)1793Tel. | | | | Drawing Number | P02 S 5 08/08/16 PostConsultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN HighLevel Constraints

P01 S 5 18/01/16 S ARISS U E LH SR AS T hedesign shown theseon drawings isillustrative andmay be subject tochange laterinstages theof HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZ Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0001 ah :Usr\h786Oerv RCDSLCmdSA H503-H-G-DZ Z Z Z EG-MP-EN-0001.mxd AR \HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZ AR CADIS\LTC\mxd\S - sers\lha76846\OneDrive C:\U Path: R ev S tatus R ev.Date Purposerevisionof Drawn Chck 'd Apprv'd schemedevelopment. ¯

River Mardyke

West Tilbury Flood Storage Area

West Tilbury Marshes

East Tilbury Marshes

River Thames

Recommended Marine Conservation Zone (rMCZ)

South Thames Shorne Southern Link Estuary and Marshes Marshes SSSI Alternatives cut line

Filborough Marshes Thames and Medway Canal

Land Take Northern Permanent Land take Western Eastern Sub-soil Land take Southern Link Southern

ESL Permanent Land take Link

WSL Permanent Land take Water Constraints Detailed river network

Flood defence

WFD river waterbodies cycle2 (Draft)

Area benefitting from flood defences

Authorised landfill site

Historic landfill site

WFD - Transitional waterbodies

Source Protection Zones Zone I - Inner protection zone

Zone II - Outer protection zone 0 1 2 Zone III - Total catchment Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project LOWER THAMES S5 P02 © Environment Agency copyright 2016. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown Scale 1:55,000 Date - copyright and database rights 2016 CROSSING 08/08/16 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME

Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Route 3 Bored Tunnel Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Land Take HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Water Constraints Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 scheme development. Path:K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental RevPlanning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD3ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002.mxd Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-Lower Thames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\Environmental Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001.mxd Rev P02 P01 Constraints Visual Amenity and Landscape Constraints Heritage Cultural Constraints Ecological Development Planned Major Land Take Land Status S5 S5 Beauty (National value) (National Beauty Natural Outstanding of Area value) Local - (National Area Conservation value) (National Garden and Parks Registered value) (National Monument Scheduled value) (Regional Building Listed II Grade value) (National Building Listed II* Grade value) (National Building Listed I Grade value) (Local Site Wildlife Local value) (Local Reserve Nature Local value) (National Zone Conservation Marine Recommended value) (National Interest Scientific Special of Site value) (National Woodland Ancient value) (International Area Protection Special value) (International Ramsar value) (International Habitat Functional Boundary Development WSL Permanent Landtake Permanent WSL Landtake Permanent ESL Landtake Sub-soil Landtake Permanent Northern Rev.Date 08/08/16 18/01/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue SAR Consultation Post Purpose of revision of Purpose SAR ISSUE SAR Hall Wood Hall Codham Codham M25 Drawn LH LH Kiln Hotel Kiln Chck'd Hall Wood Hall SR Warley Warley SR The The Hobbs Hole Hobbs Apprv'd AS AS Ordnance Survey 100030649 Survey Ordnance 2016 rights database and copyright Crown © data Survey Ordnance Contains 2016. England Natural © 2016. Heritage English © Copyright Hulmers scheme development. scheme the of stages later in change to subject be may and illustrative is drawings these on shown design The Warley Hall Warley and churchyard of St Nicholas St of churchyard and Little Little Former parish church parish Former ILLUSTRATIVE Thorndon Country Thorndon Park South Park DESIGN Hall and gardens and Hall Old Thorndon Old Church of of Church St Peter St Round Shaw Round Straight Path Shaw Path Straight THURROCK Thorndon Park Thorndon Client Thorndon Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Joint Hyder Halcrow Park Horndon West Old Plough House Plough Old Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Tel.+44(0)1793 A1089 Swindon, SN4 0QD SN4 Swindon, Hills Farm Hills Dunton Hills Family Family Hills Dunton Burderop Park Burderop Dunton Dunton Golf Centre Golf Thorndon Park Thorndon Bottom Shaws Bottom Thick/Hollow Ongar Hall Hall Ongar Timber Framed Barn Framed Timber Church of of Church All Saints All TILBURY Farm at Ongar Hall Ongar at A13 Bulphan WWII WWII Bulphan bombing decoy bombing Ongar Hall A2 All Saints Churchyard Saints All and Keepers Cottage Keepers and Linstead Farm Linstead St Mary Magdalene Mary St Mucking Eastlands Spring Eastlands Heath West Tilbury West Lytag Brownfield Lytag Cottages Church of of Church Meadow Horndon Horndon Leisure Centre Leisure Camp Quarry Camp East East Hall Cascades Cascades GRAVESEND Farmhouse Orsett Orsett Cholleys Southern Link Southern Western Project Drawing Title Drawing GRAVESHAM Thames Estuary Rainbow Power Station Power Shaw Tilbury Tilbury West Wyfields Claylane Shorne Woods Woods Shorne Country Park Country Dunton Hall Dunton Wood High Level Constraints Level High Route 4 Bored Tunnel Tunnel Bored 4 Route LOWER THAMES LOWER Marshall's Marshall's Canal and Grazing Grazing and Canal Cottage Barn to North of North to Barn Southfields Farmhouse Marsh Higham Marsh Southern Valley Valley Southern near church, near West Tilbury West Earthworks Farmhouse Golf Course Golf CROSSING Land TakeLand Church of of Church Linford St James St on the Hill the on Thong Linford Saffron Garden Saffron Chalk Pit Saffron Garden Saffron Low Street Street Low Walls at Walls Kent Downs Kent Buckland Pit Buckingham Thong and Ashenbank and Horndon defences artillery and battery Fort Coalhouse Hill Shorne Woods Goshems Farm Goshems White Horse White Cottage SHORNE Shorne Linford Village STANFORD-LE-HOPE Wood Tilbury anti-aircraft battery anti-aircraft War World Second at Bowaters Farm Bowaters at East Estuary & Estuary Marshes Thames East Cobham Hall Cobham Farmhouse Farmhouse East Court East Filborough Church of of Church Filborough Farm Filborough St Mary St Granary at Little at Granary Drawn By Drawn Project No. Project Checked By Checked Approved By Approved Scale Drawing Number Drawing South Thames South A1014 Estuary and Estuary Marshes Flats and Flats Marshes Mucking HA540039 HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0001 St Katherine's St Estuary & Estuary Marshes Thames Little Little HA Alternatives cut line cut Alternatives Link Southern Status 0 PIN A.SAUNDERS S.RIMELL L.HULME | | | | | |Originator 1:65,000 Link Southern Eastern Chestnut Green, Green, Chestnut HHJ S5 Shorne Shorne Ridgeway Shorne 1 Original Size Original St Peter and St Paul St and Peter St A289 Revision Church of of Church Date - Date Strood 2 Kilometres 08/08/16 P02 ¯ Cliffe A3 ¯

River Mardyke

Critical Drainage Area CDA_011

Critical Drainage Area CDA_010a

Critical Drainage Area CDA_010B

River Thames

West Tilbury Flood Storage Area

West Tilbury Marshes

East Tilbury Marshes

Recommended Marine Land Take Conservation Zone (rMCZ) Northern Permanent Landtake Southern Link Shorne Land Sub-soilTake Landtake Marshes Alternatives cut WSL Permanent Landtake ESL Permanent Landtake South Thames line Estuary and Filborough ESL Permanent Landtake Marshes SSSI Marshes WSL Permanent Landtake Thames and Water Constraints Medway Canal Detailed river network Water Constraints Flood defence Detailed river network Western Eastern WFDFlood river defence waterbodies Southern cycle2 (Draft) Southern WFD river waterbodies Link Link Authorisedcycle2 (Draft) landfill site

Historic landfill site

WFDAuthorised - Transitional landfill sitewaterbodies

AreaHistoric benefitting landfill site from flood defences

SourceWFD Protection - Transitional Zones waterbodies Source ZoneProtection I - Inner Zones protection zone

Zone III -- InnerOuter protection protection zone zone

Zone IIIII -- OuterTotal catchmentprotection zone 0 1 2 Zone III - Total catchment Zone of Special Interest Kilometres Copyright Status Revision Client Project LOWER THAMES S5 P02 © Environment Agency copyright 2016. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown Scale 1:60,000 Date - copyright and database rights 2016 CROSSING 08/08/16 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Drawing Title Drawn By L.HULME

Checked By S.RIMELL Approved By A.SAUNDERS Halcrow Hyder Joint Venture Route 4 Bored Tunnel Project No. HA PIN | Originator Burderop Park Original Size Swindon, SN4 0QD Land Take HA540039 HHJ A3 ILLUSTRATIVE Tel. +44(0)1793 812479 Water Constraints Drawing Number | | | P02 S5 08/08/16 Post Consultation SAR Issue LH SR AS DESIGN

P01 S5 18/01/16 SAR ISSUE LH SR AS The design shown on these drawings is illustrative and may be subject to change in later stages of the HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002 scheme development. Path: K:\UAprojects\UA007080-LowerThames Crossing\D-Calcs\GIS\EnvironmentalRev Planning\mxd\SAR\HA540039-HHJ-EGN-CD4ZZZZZEG-MP-EN-0002.mxd Status Rev. Date Purpose of revision Drawn Chck'd Apprv'd

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Appendix 6.2 - Engagement with Environmental Bodies

Engagement with Environmental Bodies

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

22/01/2015 Workshop Environment Agency (EA), Attendees provided feedback on approach and data sources Update on project and options Natural England, Marine for the purposes of the appraisal. development, share draft approach to Management Organisation Agreed future lines of communication with the attendees environmental appraisal and reporting, (MMO), Historic England and confirmed key points of contact. seek feedback on key environmental and Kent Downs Area of issues and opportunities. Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB).

04/03/2015 Bilateral Meeting Historic England Provided details about sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments To share the methodology and updated along the River Thames. environmental constraints mapping Recommended engaging with the county archaeologists (Kent and Essex) and Greater London Archaeology Advisory Service to present the scheme details to them and to obtain baseline data. Potential for significant archaeological remains across study area based on crop mark information. This will require thorough assessment and mitigation at the next development phase of the project. Provided information about a number of the designated assets and the linkages between them e.g. East and West Tilbury.

24/04/2015 Bilateral Meeting Essex County Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation To provide project update and present Council of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data. scheme options, provide an overview of the Archaeology Provided cropmark data during the meeting and highlighted the appraisal process, review constraints and high potential for there to be non-designated archaeological understand potential option effects remains that could be affected.

05/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting Greater London Advised that information would be provided on potential heritage To provide project update and present Archaeology Advisory constraints. scheme options, provide an overview of the Service Highlighted that archaeological assets were previously identified at appraisal process, review constraints and a construction compound for the M25 works. understand potential option effects

ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

07/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting Kent Downs AONB Highlighted the importance of considering the Kent Downs AONB Management Plan. To provide project update and present scheme options, provide an overview Kent Downs AONB is keen to examine any potential opportunities of the appraisal process, review from LTC to enhance the AONB. constraints and understand potential Highlighted the need for the costs associated with mitigation to be option effects incorporated into scheme costs and this should inform the decision-making process. Consideration should be given to the impact of Options at A and C on the A2 at Canterbury and on the M20 at Roundhill.

11/05/2015 Bilateral Meeting Kent County Council – Kent CC highlighted the sensitivity of the Scheduled Monuments To provide project update and present Archaeology along the River Thames to setting impacts; they are an integral scheme options, provide an overview part of the military landscape. of the appraisal process, review constraints and understand potential Advised review of the Historic Environment Record and collation option effects of the Historic Environment Characterisation Data.

03/06/2015 Bilateral Meeting Royal Society for the Protection of RSPB welcomed the approach and also the completion of a To provide project update and present Birds (RSPB) Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Report for the scheme options, provide an overview options. of the appraisal process, review RSPB advised that a GIS layer of their reserves can be presented constraints and understand potential on the constraints maps. option effects

iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

17/06/2015 Workshop Environment Agency, Natural Natural England requested a more detailed bilateral meeting to To seek feedback on the draft England, MMO and Historic discuss HRA issues further – highlighted concerns and risks shortlist and the rejected options, to England. associated with an immersed tunnel and bridge options at explore and seek feedback on the Location C and the impact on European Sites. detailed appraisal of the short list, to EA highlighted the need to consider potential contamination risks provide further details on the crossing when considering the options, for example, locations of casting types basins for an immersed tunnel. Contact DP World to discuss the ecological data that they hold as this may inform the next development stage of the project. EA highlighted that a new Thames Barrier is a major future development that could have implications for selection of the proposed solution. EA highlighted works undertaken as part of the TE2100 Plan and issues associated with HRA and habitat creation/compensation. Recommended that a further meeting be held to discuss the likely potential to recreate habitat in the event of it being affected by the Scheme (relating to loss of habitat associated with European Sites).

iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

01/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting Environment Agency There is a Flood Storage Area located between Tilbury and To seek detailed feedback on that could be affected by Route 2. This is elements of the water environment potentially a significant issue for this option as there would be a appraisal, to discuss contaminated need to create compensatory storage in the event of this area land constraints and to understand being affected. the Environment Agency (EA) future Groundwater conditions are very complex and constantly plans with regards to TE2100 changing, the need for early monitoring data to inform the design of the proposed solution should be considered. There are limited opportunities to create compensatory habitat within the LTC area owing to coastal squeeze and managed realignments. Engage with the London Gateway Partnership to discuss compensatory land and how they have approached the issue. Highlighted the need for the scheme to also consider opportunities e.g. road embankments could provide a flood defence function that may support proposals in TE2100, there is potential for enhancement measures at Mardyke. Must consider presence of historic landfills as there may be asbestos present and there are associated high costs associated with disposal. Should a tunnel at location A be progressed it will be important to consider the impacts of any dewatering on Dartford Marshes. Dewatering at location C could have a significant impact on habitats.

v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

28/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting Natural England Advised that a Part One Appropriate Assessment Report should To seek feedback on the proposed be completed as there is a likelihood of significant effects as a approach to the HRA of the short list result of the options. Approach to the Part One Appropriate Assessment was discussed including the fact that there would be a lot of uncertainty at this stage and that a traffic light system should be considered in the reporting. Highlighted the need for the assessment of a Ramsar site to cover more than just the bird interest. Natural England stated that the wider project team must be made aware of the risks associated with options and the potential effects on European Sites. Project costings also need to consider ‘whole life costs’ and compensation requirements (securing management of compensatory habitat in perpetuity). Natural England stated that assessment of alternatives is a key consideration and that discounting of an option with a higher cost but with a lesser impact on a European Site would not be a reason to discount an option. Natural England advised that the Part One Appropriate Assessment should consider other schemes and the potential for cumulative effects.

vi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

28/07/2015 Bilateral Meeting Natural England and the Highlighted that it would be difficult to create fresh water habitat To discuss the approach to identifying Environment Agency and tidal habitats and that there would be long lead in times mitigation/ compensation land. associated with this and the time it would take for the habitat to be viewed as functional. For each option where there may be a loss of habitat within a European Site it will be necessary to quantify the area affected (e.g. construction, operation and sterilisation due to other effects) before addressing the issues of availability and re-create ability. EA/Natural England advised that the scheme should aim to work within the bounds of presumption to compensate ahead of any impact on a Natura 2000 site (or its qualifying species) at a minimum ratio of 1:1. However, the ratio of compensatory habitat to be provided needs to be considered on a case by case basis. The challenge will be identifying a suitable ratio of compensatory habitat related to the time taken before the compensatory habitat becomes ‘functional’ and the stability of that habitat once it has become established (i.e. loss of intertidal habitat over time as saltmarsh develops). There is also a risk that compensatory habitat does not work, i.e. freshwater habitat creation much more difficult to achieve than intertidal habitats. There are no ‘fixed’ timescales for assessing when the condition of the compensatory habitat would be of comparable (or higher) value to that of the habitat which has been lost. Instead, it would be compared to the wider Natura 2000 network of adjacent habitats. Ultimately, the requirement would be for the compensatory habitat to form part of the surrounding Natura 2000 network of sites. All meeting attendees highlighted that the HRA process cannot be ‘short-cut’ and that each stage must be followed and that consideration of the least damaging alternative will be essential. Some potential areas for compensatory habitat were discussed within the LTC area.

vii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

14/08/2015 Bilateral Meeting RSPB RSPB advised the inclusion of Holehaven Creek pSPA (potential To provide an update on the Special Protection Area) and Site of Special Scientific Interest proposed HRA methodology (SSSI) within the HRA. Advised that hydrology impacts on wetland habitats should be considered. RSPB will provide information received from Rainham Marshes regarding bird movements and effects from the existing Dartford Crossing. Recommended looking at Kent Wildlife Trust’s biodiversity area mapping which identified existing ecological networks.

24/09/2015 Bilateral Meeting Environment Agency Advised that the Water Framework Directive (WFD) assessment To provide an update on the guidance may be available in January 2016 and it would be environmental appraisal and advisable to use the new guidance at the next development phase crossings and to discuss opportunities of the project. and risks. The Tilbury Flood Storage Area and the potential constraints for Route 2 was highlighted. A route through the Flood Storage Area is feasible so long as mitigation is put in place but cautioned it may be difficult to find a feasible option because of lack of capacity. Mardyke is an important area for water vole population. Opportunities for ecological enhancement should be considered. WFD salt marsh survey is likely to be undertaken in 2016 and the results of this survey may be useful for the next development stage of the project.

5/10/2015 Bilateral Meeting Natural England Natural England highlighted the importance of the ditch network in To discuss the draft Part 1 the Ramsar site and its sensitive hydrology. Appropriate Assessment Natural England reiterated the points raised in previous meetings about HRA and the need for the results of this to inform the selection of the proposed solution.

viii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

30/11/2015 Bilateral Meeting Natural England, MMO and Further meeting during the consultation would be beneficial with To provide a project update and initial Historic England. the Statutory Environmental Bodies (SEBs) to enable results of the appraisal discussion of the appraisal results. Natural England raised concern about the loss of wildlife sites and severance of ancient woodland for the ESL although they are pleased regarding the selection of a bored tunnel. Natural England stated that mitigation such as a green bridge for the ESL is potentially something that Highways England could consider. Historic England stated that whilst there may be some heritage concerns it will be easier for them to understand the impacts once more detail of the road alignment is made available and in particular how close the road will be to heritage assets. It was acknowledged that there is a greater concentration of heritage assets around the ESL compared to the WSL.

30/11/2015 Bilateral Meeting Kent Downs AONB The AONB requested the opportunity to be involved in the To provide a project update methodology for a future Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment for the proposed solution. The AONB welcomed the discounting of certain options that would have had a greater impact on the AONB.

ix POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meetings Post Launch of the 2016 Consultation

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

08/02/2016 Consultation Meeting Natural England Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during To provide a project update and Historic England consultation rather than to discuss scheme details. to outline the materials that were Environment Agency Clarification was provided by the LTC team about where specific available during the consultation scheme information could be obtained from the consultation process. documents.

14/03/2016 Bilateral Meeting RSPB Meeting was primarily to advise on information available during To provide a project update consultation rather than to discuss scheme details. Various data sources were identified that would provide useful information to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the preferred route.

21/07/2016 SEB Meeting Natural England Environment Agency highlighted the importance of ensuring that To discuss the main comments Historic England issues associated with landfills potentially crossed by options are taken into account early enough in the design process. raised by the consultees in Environment Agency response to the consultation Historic England stated that they would like to be engaged in setting the scope of the cultural heritage assessment and that discussions will be required regarding mitigation options particularly where features are directly affect (Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments). Natural England stated that they would provide advice to inform the development of ecological survey methodologies for the future EIA. All parties acknowledged that the consultation process to date had been very helpful.

08/08/2016 Bilateral Meeting Kent Downs AONB AONB provided advice regarding their draft position statement on To provide a project update and setting and advised that setting is very important and must be to discuss their response to the considered as part of the future Landscape and Visual Impact consultation Assessment. AONB stated that they would like to be involved in establishing the scope of the LVIA for the preferred route. AONB commented that in terms of mitigation the AONB would expect exceptional effort particularly with regards to impacts as a result of the Eastern Southern Link. They highlighted the importance of learning from best practice in other countries. The AONB’s Management Plan is very clear about mitigation and compensation.

x POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Meeting Date Purpose of Meeting Attendees Key Findings

04/08/2016 Bilateral Meeting Kent Wildlife Trust Noted that ecological mitigation may be significant and should be considered as part of overall project costs. To provide details of the project and to discuss their response to Recommended that LTC establish environmental stakeholder groups the consultation for Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) so that any conflict of interest and joint initiatives can be considered more easily. One for Essex and one for Kent. May wish to include Natural England as over- arching authority for natural environment.

North Kent Environmental Planning Group cited as effective example, which has developed a plan to reduce recreational impacts on Natura 2000 sites in Kent; care to be taken to avoid impacts (from LTC) on delivery of this plan.

All Kent WLT biological records held by the Kent and Medway Biological Records Centre. Data requests can also be made via Buglife.

11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting The Woodland Trust Advised of NPPF, NPS and current Standing Advice from Forestry Commission and Natural England with regard to irreplaceable nature of To provide details of the project ancient woodland. and to discuss their response to the consultation Confirmed that loss of ancient woodland remains a significant concern. Currently 633 cases where ancient woodland under threat in UK from development.

Noted that cannot mitigate loss, but compensation (as final resort) should be significant and ideally consist of reinstatement of Planted Ancient Woodland Sites or native tree planting to link remaining remnants of ancient woodland to improve ecological function.

Concern that Route 2 and, particularly, Route 4 affect ancient woodland, whilst Route 3 north of river more favourable, but should consider potential for impact on veteran/ ancient trees. 11/08/2016 Bilateral meeting Buglife Advised the Thames Terrace Grasslands in Essex support 2 of the top 5 invertebrate sites in the UK. This area of Essex has highest levels of To provide details of the project invertebrate diversity in England. and to discuss their response to the consultation This network of important invertebrates sites should be considered as a whole, not on individual site basis.

xi POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Appendix 6.3 - Air Quality Results

PREDICTED ANNUAL MEAN NO2 CONCENTRATIONS AT SELECTED RECEPTORS WITHIN 200 METRES OF AFFECTED ROAD NETWORK Approximate Route 3 Route3 Route 4 Route 4 Do Route 1 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Number of Receptor Route 1 WSL ESL WSL ESL Minimum Change WSL ESL WSL ESL Potentially ID (µg/m³)[1] Change Change Change Change (µg/m³) [1] µg/m³) (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] Influenced (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) Receptors [2] R1 34.3 39.5 5.2 34.4 0.1 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 34.5 0.2 <10 R2 27.5 32.5 5.0 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 27.9 0.4 <50 R3 40.0 39.5 -0.5 40.0 0.0 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 40.1 0.1 <50 R4 50.5 47.7 -2.8 46.6 -3.9 46.7 -3.8 46.7 -3.8 46.8 -3.7 <10 R5 41.4 42.6 1.2 40.7 -0.7 40.7 -0.7 40.8 -0.6 40.8 -0.6 <50 R6 34.8 36.8 2.0 34.3 -0.5 34.3 -0.5 34.4 -0.4 34.4 -0.4 <50 R7 33.5 35.3 1.8 32.9 -0.6 32.9 -0.6 33.0 -0.5 33.0 -0.5 <50 R8 47.7 51.2 3.5 47.4 -0.3 47.5 -0.2 47.6 -0.1 47.6 -0.1 <50 R9 47.9 51.9 4.0 44.1 -3.8 44.1 -3.8 44.2 -3.7 44.2 -3.7 <50 R10 42.1 45.1 3.0 39.1 -3.0 39.2 -2.9 39.2 -2.9 39.3 -2.8 <50 R11 41.7 44.4 2.7 37.2 -4.5 37.2 -4.5 37.3 -4.4 37.3 -4.4 <100 R12 52.0 55.6 3.6 45.0 -7.0 45.0 -7.0 45.2 -6.8 45.2 -6.8 <50 R13 41.9 44.0 2.1 39.4 -2.5 39.4 -2.5 39.5 -2.4 39.5 -2.4 <50 R14 34.7 36.6 1.9 33.8 -0.9 33.8 -0.9 33.9 -0.8 33.9 -0.8 <50 R15 35.2 37.3 2.1 34.6 -0.6 34.6 -0.6 34.7 -0.5 34.7 -0.5 <50 R16 20.2 20.2 0.0 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 20.1 -0.1 <10 R17 21.7 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 21.7 0.0 <50 R18 23.5 23.5 0.0 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 23.3 -0.2 23.4 -0.1 <50 R19 20.1 20.2 0.1 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 20.1 0.0 <50 R20 25.8 26.1 0.3 25.3 -0.5 25.3 -0.5 25.4 -0.4 25.3 -0.5 <10 R21 23.6 23.5 -0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 23.0 -0.6 23.7 0.1 <100

i POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Approximate Route 3 Route3 Route 4 Route 4 Do Route 1 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Number of Receptor Route 1 WSL ESL WSL ESL Minimum Change WSL ESL WSL ESL Potentially ID (µg/m³)[1] Change Change Change Change (µg/m³) [1] µg/m³) (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] Influenced (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) Receptors [2] R22 27.5 27.6 0.1 26.9 -0.6 27 -0.5 26.9 -0.6 27.0 -0.5 <50 R23 21.8 21.8 0.0 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 21.9 0.1 <50 R24 26.9 26.7 -0.2 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 26.8 -0.1 <10 R25 23.8 23.8 0.0 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 23.9 0.1 <50 R26 33.1 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.1 0.0 33.0 -0.1 33.0 -0.1 <100 R27 37.3 37.0 -0.3 37.2 -0.1 37.2 -0.1 37.1 -0.2 37.1 -0.2 <100 R28 38.1 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 37.7 -0.4 37.5 -0.6 37.6 -0.5 <100 R29 24.5 25.0 0.5 24.8 0.3 24.9 0.4 25.0 0.5 25.0 0.5 <50 R30 17.8 18.3 0.5 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 17.6 -0.2 <10 R31 21.5 21.7 0.2 20.9 -0.6 20.9 -0.6 21.1 -0.4 21.1 -0.4 <50 R32 25.4 25.8 0.4 24.2 -1.2 24.2 -1.2 24.6 -0.8 24.6 -0.8 <10 R33 30.2 30.8 0.6 34.8 4.6 34.9 4.7 28.9 -1.3 28.9 -1.3 <10 R34 24.7 24.8 0.1 25.9 1.2 25.9 1.2 24.0 -0.7 24.0 -0.7 <10 R35 17.4 17.4 0.0 17.1 -0.3 17.1 -0.3 18.5 1.1 18.6 1.2 <10 R36 22.3 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.4 0.1 23.0 0.7 22.5 0.2 <100 R37 20.5 20.6 0.1 20.1 -0.4 20.1 -0.4 20.4 -0.1 20.5 0.0 <10 R38 20.9 20.9 0.0 20.6 -0.3 20.6 -0.3 21.5 0.6 21.6 0.7 <50 R39 17.1 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 <100 R40 12.4 12.4 0.0 11.9 -0.5 13.8 1.4 11.9 -0.5 13.7 1.3 <50 R41 36.9 40.3 3.4 36.0 -0.9 36.0 -0.9 36.1 -0.8 36.1 -0.8 <50 R42 27.3 27.6 0.3 26.9 -0.4 26.9 -0.4 27.0 -0.3 27.0 -0.3 <10 R43 22.2 22.3 0.1 22.0 -0.2 22 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 22.0 -0.2 <50 R44 12.1 12.1 0.0 13.7 1.6 13.3 1.2 13.6 1.5 13.2 1.1 <10 R45 24.9 25.5 0.6 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 24.6 -0.3 <10 R46 28.4 28.5 0.1 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 28.6 0.2 <50

ii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Approximate Route 3 Route3 Route 4 Route 4 Do Route 1 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Number of Receptor Route 1 WSL ESL WSL ESL Minimum Change WSL ESL WSL ESL Potentially ID (µg/m³)[1] Change Change Change Change (µg/m³) [1] µg/m³) (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] Influenced (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) Receptors [2] R47 28.5 28.5 0.0 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 28.7 0.2 <50 R48 22.9 22.8 -0.1 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 21.4 -1.5 <10 R49 31.4 33.0 1.6 30.5 -0.9 30.5 -0.9 30.7 -0.7 30.6 -0.8 <10 R50 16.8 16.9 0.1 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 17.0 0.2 <10 R51 19.5 19.5 0.0 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 19.6 0.1 <50 R52 20.7 20.5 -0.2 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.8 0.1 <100 R53 35.4 38.9 3.5 35.6 0.2 35.5 0.1 35.7 0.3 35.6 0.2 <10 R54 24.1 24.4 0.3 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 24.3 0.2 24.2 0.1 <10 R55 21.4 21.8 0.4 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 21.5 0.1 <10 R56 19.0 19.2 0.2 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 <10 R57 19.4 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.6 0.2 19.7 0.3 19.6 0.2 <10 R58 18.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 18.6 0.3 <10 R59 19.1 19.0 -0.1 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 18.9 -0.2 18.8 -0.3 <50 R60 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <10 R61 17.6 17.8 0.2 17.4 -0.2 17.3 -0.3 17.4 -0.2 17.4 -0.2 <10 R62 23.0 23.1 0.1 22.8 -0.2 22.6 -0.4 22.9 -0.1 22.6 -0.4 <100 R63 19.6 19.9 0.3 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 19.3 -0.3 19.2 -0.4 <10 R64 15.4 15.6 0.2 15.1 -0.3 15.0 -0.4 15.2 -0.2 15.1 -0.3 <10 R65 13.0 13.2 0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.8 -0.2 12.9 -0.1 12.9 -0.1 <10 R66 16.0 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 15.9 -0.1 16.0 0.0 15.9 -0.1 <50 R67 22.6 22.7 0.1 22.9 0.3 21.8 -0.8 22.2 -0.4 21.9 -0.7 <100 R68 25.0 25.1 0.1 26.8 1.8 35.1 10.1 26.7 1.7 34.9 9.9 <50 R69 12.2 12.2 0.0 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 12.4 0.2 12.5 0.3 <50 R70 22.2 22.2 0.0 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 23.2 1.0 23.6 1.4 <50 R71 22.9 22.9 0.0 25.1 2.2 25.5 2.6 25.0 2.1 25.5 2.6 <50

iii POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Approximate Route 3 Route3 Route 4 Route 4 Do Route 1 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Number of Receptor Route 1 WSL ESL WSL ESL Minimum Change WSL ESL WSL ESL Potentially ID (µg/m³)[1] Change Change Change Change (µg/m³) [1] µg/m³) (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] Influenced (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) Receptors [2] R72 18.5 18.5 0.0 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 18.7 0.2 18.8 0.3 <10 R73 15.8 15.8 0.0 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 15.9 0.1 <100 R74 21.8 21.9 0.1 22.2 0.4 22.2 0.4 21.3 -0.5 21.3 -0.5 <50 R75 22.9 23.0 0.1 25.2 2.3 25.2 2.3 23.1 0.2 23.1 0.2 <10 R76 29.9 30.3 0.4 32.6 2.7 32.7 2.8 32.7 2.8 32.8 2.9 <10 R77 21.1 21.2 0.1 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 21.4 0.3 <10 R78 18.7 18.8 0.1 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 18.4 -0.3 18.3 -0.4 <50 R79 25.4 25.6 0.2 25.1 -0.3 25 -0.4 25.1 -0.3 25.1 -0.3 <100 R80 22.1 22.2 0.1 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 22.2 0.1 23.3 1.2 <10 R81 25.5 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 25.5 0.0 <10 R82 19.6 19.6 0.0 20.0 0.4 20 0.4 19.7 0.1 19.7 0.1 <50 R83 12.4 12.4 0.0 14.1 1.7 12.1 -0.3 14.0 1.6 12.1 -0.3 <10 R84 20.2 20.2 0.0 19.0 -1.2 19.0 -1.2 19.2 -1.0 19.2 -1.0 <10 R85 19.2 19.1 -0.1 18.6 -0.6 18.6 -0.6 20.1 0.9 20.2 1.0 <10 R86 16.7 16.6 -0.1 16.9 0.2 16.9 0.2 16.4 -0.3 16.4 -0.3 <50 R87 18.4 18.5 0.1 18.7 0.3 18.7 0.3 18.6 0.2 18.6 0.2 <10 R88 17.5 17.5 0.0 17.4 -0.1 17.4 -0.1 17.8 0.3 17.8 0.3 <50 R89 12.5 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 14.5 2.0 12.5 0.0 14.3 1.8 <50 R93 15.7 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.4 17.7 2.0 16.1 0.4 17.6 1.9 <10 R94 15.6 15.7 0.1 15.8 0.2 15.8 0.2 15.6 0.0 15.6 0.0 <10 R95 13.7 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 14.6 0.9 14.7 1.0 <10 R100 14.5 14.5 0.0 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 14.6 0.1 <10 R101 14.9 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 14.9 0.0 <100 R102 13.9 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.9 0.0 13.8 -0.1 13.8 -0.1 <10 R103 31.3 31.6 0.3 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 31.5 0.2 <100

iv POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

POST CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 – SECTION 10 APPENDICES)

Approximate Route 3 Route3 Route 4 Route 4 Do Route 1 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Number of Receptor Route 1 WSL ESL WSL ESL Minimum Change WSL ESL WSL ESL Potentially ID (µg/m³)[1] Change Change Change Change (µg/m³) [1] µg/m³) (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] (µg/m³)[1] Influenced (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) (µg/m³) Receptors [2] R104 29.1 29.2 0.1 28.4 -0.7 28.4 -0.7 28.7 -0.4 28.8 -0.3 <100 R105 18.3 18.3 0.0 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.4 0.1 18.3 0.0 <100 R106 20.6 20.7 0.1 21.4 0.8 21.7 1.1 21.4 0.8 21.6 1.0 <100 R107 14.1 14.1 0.0 13.0 -1.1 15.1 1.0 13.0 -1.1 15.0 0.9 <50 R108 11.8 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 11.7 -0.1 11.8 0.0 <50 R109 14.1 14.1 0.0 15.2 1.1 14.9 0.8 15.1 1.0 14.8 0.7 <50

[1] LTT=Long Term Trend. Predicted NO2 concentrations were adjusted using a Gap Factor based on the long term adjustment factor calculated by Highways England’s Interim Alternative Long Term Gap Analysis Calculator v1.1. All values reflect predicted concentrations for the future year 2025. [2] Value reflects an approximated number of receptors which occur in the vicinity (and thereby may experience a similar effect of the scheme) as the modelled receptor.

v POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 6 - SECTION 10 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012 DATE PUBLISHED - MARCH 2017

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information, please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.

© Crown copyright 2017. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence: visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected].

This document is also available on our website at www.gov.uk/highways

If you have any enquiries about this publication email [email protected] or call 0300 123 5000*. Please quote the Highways England publications code PR167/15

Highways England creative job number S160683

Report No HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-012