Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 5-7-2016 "That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O. Boyd Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Boyd, Charles O., ""That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by Charles Boyd Under the Direction of Wendy Venet, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis examines abolitionist support for interracial marriage. It demonstrates that far from being a marginal viewpoint within the movement, support for interracial marriage was widespread among both black and white abolitionists. Many abolitionists stated they personally did not recommend interracial marriage at present due to the backlash couples would face, while also denying that it was unnatural or immoral. A few abolitionists eschewed such a disclaimer. A few also married people of different races themselves. To a considerable extent, defense of interracial marriage was part of a larger push for racial integration and equality. This thesis also looks at British abolitionists who criticized the American stigma against interracial marriage, and children and grandchildren of abolitionists who defended interracial marriage, the most prominent being the famous, controversial lawyer, Clarence Darrow. INDEX WORDS: Abolitionism, slavery, interracial marriage, racial equality “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by CHARLES BOYD A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Art in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2016 Copyright by Charles Boyd 2016 “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by CHARLES BOYD Committee Chair: Wendy Venet Committee: Wendy Venet Robert Baker Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University May 2016 iv DEDICATION To all the people who have stood up for the freedom to marry. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to first thank my adviser, Dr. Wendy Venet, for all the time she has put into helping me make this the best thesis possible. I want to thank my other committee member, Dr. Robert Baker, for his support and feedback. I want to thank Dr. Jacqueline Rouse for encouraging me on this project and helping me sharpen my scholarship/research skills. I also wish to thank Drs. Ian Fletcher and Denis Gainty for their enthusiastic encouragement. And finally, I would like to thank all of the friends and family who gave me advice and encouragement in this thesis. I hope you all know how much help you have been. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 CHAPTER 2: “THEIR MARRIAGE IS NEITHER UNNATURAL NOR REPUGNANT TO NATURE:” ABOLITIONISTS WHO DEFENDED INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE .............................................................................12 CHAPTER 3: “TO REPEAL ALL LAWS IN THIS STATE, WHICH MAKE ANY DISTINCTION AMONG ITS INHABITANTS, ON ACCOUNT OF COLOR:” THE ABOLITIONIST CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE IN MASSACHUSETTS ....................................46 CHAPTER 4: “I WOULD NEVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, TRY TO SEPARATE PERSONS WHO REALLY LOVED:” BRITISH ABOLITIONISTS WHO CRITICIZED AMERICA ON INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE ...........................................................................................................65 CHAPTER 5: “THIS PROVES I AM IMPARTIAL:” ABOLITIONISTS WHO CROSSED THE COLOR LINE IN MARRIAGE ..................................73 CHAPTER 6: “IS THERE ANY REASON WHY A WHITE GIRL SHOULD NOT MARRY A MAN WITH AFRICAN BLOOD IN HIS VEINS?:” NEO- ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE ................101 CHAPTER 7: “AN INVASION OF ONE OF THE INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF EVERY MAN”: COMMON GROUND BETWEEN ABOLITIONIST SUPPORTERS OF INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE AND MODERN GAY MARRIAGE ADVOCATES ...............................................................................112 CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION ............................................................................119 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................128 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 147 Appendix A: Interview with Dr. James McPherson ...................................................... 147 Appendix B: Interview with Eric Foner ......................................................................... 147 8 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Out of all the manifestations of racism in America, the stigmatization of interracial marriage has been one of the most virulent. While bans on interracial marriage originated largely as a method of solidifying slavery, these bans and the stigma that they helped foster have far outlasted the end of legalized human bondage. Indeed, this stigma was not eliminated as a result of interracial marriage being legalized. In 2009, a Louisiana judge was revealed to have a policy of refusing marriage licenses to interracial couples.1 In 2012, a Montana judge was revealed to have forwarded via email a joke that compared interracial relationships to bestiality.2 In 2013, a commercial for Cheerios that featured an interracial couple and their daughter prompted so many derogatory comments after being uploaded to YouTube that the comments section had to be disabled.3 And in 2016, an interracial couple in Mississippi was ejected from an RV park after neighbors objected to their relationship.4 The continued refusal of many Americans to accept interracial couples is part of a long, deeply rooted opposition to interracial marriage in American history. The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, supported legislation to strengthen the 1691 ban on interracial marriage in Virginia.5 When the Declaration was written, the majority of the thirteen colonies banned interracial marriage. As recently as the end of World War II, thirty out of forty-eight states, including perceived liberal bastions Oregon and California, still had interracial marriage bans.6 It was not until the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the 1967 Loving v. Virginia decision that interracial marriage became legal in the South. While opposition to interracial marriage has been longstanding in American society, there has also been a long tradition of support, exemplified by abolitionists in the nineteenth century. In order to understand abolitionist support for interracial marriage, it is necessary to define the term “abolitionist,” which, for the purposes of this thesis, will refer to anyone who favored immediate 9 emancipation for all slaves. Many white and black members of the movement defended interracial marriage. Many racially egalitarian abolitionists, men and women, blacks and whites, saw the breaking down of barriers for interracial couples as an essential part of the struggle to liberate African Americans and end the scourge of racial bigotry in America. While often giving disclaimers stating that they advised against people marrying individuals of different races in the current society, due to the stigma such marriages would encounter, these abolitionists insisted before, during, and after the Civil War that interracial marriage was not unnatural or immoral and that interracial marriage bans were unjust. The abolitionists who defended interracial marriage were motivated largely by a belief in racial equality that included integration, equal rights, and in some cases, the idea that all races in the United States would eventually merge together. The significant amount of primary sources related to the topic notwithstanding, the historiographical treatment of interracial marriage support in the abolitionist movement has been mixed. Paul Goodman’s overall superb book, Of One Blood: Abolitionism and the Origins of Racial Equality, centers on abolitionist support for racial equality but gives minimal attention to abolitionists’ defense of interracial marriage. However, other historians have shown more interest in studying pro-interracial marriage abolitionists. In 1955, Louis Ruchames published an essay called, “Race, Marriage, and Abolition in Massachusetts,” documenting the push for legalization in the Bay State. In 1964, a young James McPherson discussed a number of abolitionists who offered explicit defenses of interracial marriage in The Struggle For Equality: Abolitionists and the Negro in the Civil War and Reconstruction. In Anti-Racism in U.S. History: The First Two Hundred Years, Herbert Aptheker used McPherson’s evidence as a starting point to draw attention to other abolitionists who supported interracial marriage. James Brewer Stewart’s biography of Wendell Phillips, Carolyn Karcher’s biography of Lydia Maria Child, and Henry 10 Mayer’s biography