Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 5-7-2016 "That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O. Boyd Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Boyd, Charles O., ""That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by Charles Boyd Under the Direction of Wendy Venet, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis examines abolitionist support for interracial marriage. It demonstrates that far from being a marginal viewpoint within the movement, support for interracial marriage was widespread among both black and white abolitionists. Many abolitionists stated they personally did not recommend interracial marriage at present due to the backlash couples would face, while also denying that it was unnatural or immoral. A few abolitionists eschewed such a disclaimer. A few also married people of different races themselves. To a considerable extent, defense of interracial marriage was part of a larger push for racial integration and equality. This thesis also looks at British abolitionists who criticized the American stigma against interracial marriage, and children and grandchildren of abolitionists who defended interracial marriage, the most prominent being the famous, controversial lawyer, Clarence Darrow. INDEX WORDS: Abolitionism, slavery, interracial marriage, racial equality “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by CHARLES BOYD A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Art in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2016 Copyright by Charles Boyd 2016 “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by CHARLES BOYD Committee Chair: Wendy Venet Committee: Wendy Venet Robert Baker Electronic Version Approved: Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University May 2016 iv DEDICATION To all the people who have stood up for the freedom to marry. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to first thank my adviser, Dr. Wendy Venet, for all the time she has put into helping me make this the best thesis possible. I want to thank my other committee member, Dr. Robert Baker, for his support and feedback. I want to thank Dr. Jacqueline Rouse for encouraging me on this project and helping me sharpen my scholarship/research skills. I also wish to thank Drs. Ian Fletcher and Denis Gainty for their enthusiastic encouragement. And finally, I would like to thank all of the friends and family who gave me advice and encouragement in this thesis. I hope you all know how much help you have been. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 8 CHAPTER 2: “THEIR MARRIAGE IS NEITHER UNNATURAL NOR REPUGNANT TO NATURE:” ABOLITIONISTS WHO DEFENDED INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE .............................................................................12 CHAPTER 3: “TO REPEAL ALL LAWS IN THIS STATE, WHICH MAKE ANY DISTINCTION AMONG ITS INHABITANTS, ON ACCOUNT OF COLOR:” THE ABOLITIONIST CAMPAIGN TO LEGALIZE INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE IN MASSACHUSETTS ....................................46 CHAPTER 4: “I WOULD NEVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, TRY TO SEPARATE PERSONS WHO REALLY LOVED:” BRITISH ABOLITIONISTS WHO CRITICIZED AMERICA ON INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE ...........................................................................................................65 CHAPTER 5: “THIS PROVES I AM IMPARTIAL:” ABOLITIONISTS WHO CROSSED THE COLOR LINE IN MARRIAGE ..................................73 CHAPTER 6: “IS THERE ANY REASON WHY A WHITE GIRL SHOULD NOT MARRY A MAN WITH AFRICAN BLOOD IN HIS VEINS?:” NEO- ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE ................101 CHAPTER 7: “AN INVASION OF ONE OF THE INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF EVERY MAN”: COMMON GROUND BETWEEN ABOLITIONIST SUPPORTERS OF INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE AND MODERN GAY MARRIAGE ADVOCATES ...............................................................................112 CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION ............................................................................119 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................128 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 147 Appendix A: Interview with Dr. James McPherson ...................................................... 147 Appendix B: Interview with Eric Foner ......................................................................... 147 8 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Out of all the manifestations of racism in America, the stigmatization of interracial marriage has been one of the most virulent. While bans on interracial marriage originated largely as a method of solidifying slavery, these bans and the stigma that they helped foster have far outlasted the end of legalized human bondage. Indeed, this stigma was not eliminated as a result of interracial marriage being legalized. In 2009, a Louisiana judge was revealed to have a policy of refusing marriage licenses to interracial couples.1 In 2012, a Montana judge was revealed to have forwarded via email a joke that compared interracial relationships to bestiality.2 In 2013, a commercial for Cheerios that featured an interracial couple and their daughter prompted so many derogatory comments after being uploaded to YouTube that the comments section had to be disabled.3 And in 2016, an interracial couple in Mississippi was ejected from an RV park after neighbors objected to their relationship.4 The continued refusal of many Americans to accept interracial couples is part of a long, deeply rooted opposition to interracial marriage in American history. The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, supported legislation to strengthen the 1691 ban on interracial marriage in Virginia.5 When the Declaration was written, the majority of the thirteen colonies banned interracial marriage. As recently as the end of World War II, thirty out of forty-eight states, including perceived liberal bastions Oregon and California, still had interracial marriage bans.6 It was not until the U.S. Supreme Court handed down the 1967 Loving v. Virginia decision that interracial marriage became legal in the South. While opposition to interracial marriage has been longstanding in American society, there has also been a long tradition of support, exemplified by abolitionists in the nineteenth century. In order to understand abolitionist support for interracial marriage, it is necessary to define the term “abolitionist,” which, for the purposes of this thesis, will refer to anyone who favored immediate 9 emancipation for all slaves. Many white and black members of the movement defended interracial marriage. Many racially egalitarian abolitionists, men and women, blacks and whites, saw the breaking down of barriers for interracial couples as an essential part of the struggle to liberate African Americans and end the scourge of racial bigotry in America. While often giving disclaimers stating that they advised against people marrying individuals of different races in the current society, due to the stigma such marriages would encounter, these abolitionists insisted before, during, and after the Civil War that interracial marriage was not unnatural or immoral and that interracial marriage bans were unjust. The abolitionists who defended interracial marriage were motivated largely by a belief in racial equality that included integration, equal rights, and in some cases, the idea that all races in the United States would eventually merge together. The significant amount of primary sources related to the topic notwithstanding, the historiographical treatment of interracial marriage support in the abolitionist movement has been mixed. Paul Goodman’s overall superb book, Of One Blood: Abolitionism and the Origins of Racial Equality, centers on abolitionist support for racial equality but gives minimal attention to abolitionists’ defense of interracial marriage. However, other historians have shown more interest in studying pro-interracial marriage abolitionists. In 1955, Louis Ruchames published an essay called, “Race, Marriage, and Abolition in Massachusetts,” documenting the push for legalization in the Bay State. In 1964, a young James McPherson discussed a number of abolitionists who offered explicit defenses of interracial marriage in The Struggle For Equality: Abolitionists and the Negro in the Civil War and Reconstruction. In Anti-Racism in U.S. History: The First Two Hundred Years, Herbert Aptheker used McPherson’s evidence as a starting point to draw attention to other abolitionists who supported interracial marriage. James Brewer Stewart’s biography of Wendell Phillips, Carolyn Karcher’s biography of Lydia Maria Child, and Henry 10 Mayer’s biography
Recommended publications
  • Frederick Douglass
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection AMERICAN CRISIS BIOGRAPHIES Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph. D. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Zbe Hmcrican Crisis Biographies Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph.D. With the counsel and advice of Professor John B. McMaster, of the University of Pennsylvania. Each I2mo, cloth, with frontispiece portrait. Price $1.25 net; by mail» $i-37- These biographies will constitute a complete and comprehensive history of the great American sectional struggle in the form of readable and authoritative biography. The editor has enlisted the co-operation of many competent writers, as will be noted from the list given below. An interesting feature of the undertaking is that the series is to be im- partial, Southern writers having been assigned to Southern subjects and Northern writers to Northern subjects, but all will belong to the younger generation of writers, thus assuring freedom from any suspicion of war- time prejudice. The Civil War will not be treated as a rebellion, but as the great event in the history of our nation, which, after forty years, it is now clearly recognized to have been. Now ready: Abraham Lincoln. By ELLIS PAXSON OBERHOLTZER. Thomas H. Benton. By JOSEPH M. ROGERS. David G. Farragut. By JOHN R. SPEARS. William T. Sherman. By EDWARD ROBINS. Frederick Douglass. By BOOKER T. WASHINGTON. Judah P. Benjamin. By FIERCE BUTLER. In preparation: John C. Calhoun. By GAILLARD HUNT. Daniel Webster. By PROF. C. H. VAN TYNE. Alexander H. Stephens. BY LOUIS PENDLETON. John Quincy Adams.
    [Show full text]
  • RELIGIOSITY and REFORM in OBERLIN, OHIO, 1833-1859 Matthew Inh Tz Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2012 PARADISE FOUND: RELIGIOSITY AND REFORM IN OBERLIN, OHIO, 1833-1859 Matthew inH tz Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hintz, Matthew, "PARADISE FOUND: RELIGIOSITY AND REFORM IN OBERLIN, OHIO, 1833-1859" (2012). All Theses. 1338. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1338 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARADISE FOUND: RELIGIOSITY AND REFORM IN OBERLIN, OHIO, 1833-1859 A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of the Arts History by Matthew David Hintz May 2012 Accepted by: H. Roger Grant, Committee Chair C. Alan Grubb Orville V. Burton ABSTRACT Founded as a quasi-utopian society by New England evangelists, Oberlin became the central hub of extreme social reform in Ohio’s Western Reserve. Scholars have looked at Oberlin from political and cultural perspectives, but have placed little emphasis on religion. That is to say, although religion is a major highlight of secondary scholarship, few have placed the community appropriately in the dynamic of the East and West social reform movement. Historians have often ignored, or glossed over this important element and how it represented the divergence between traditional orthodoxy in New England and Middle-Atlantic states, and the new religious hybrids found in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title A Family Affair: The Marriage of Elizabeth Cady and Henry Brewster Stanton and the Development of Reform Politics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/22k374td Author Frank, Linda Christine Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles A Family Affair: The Marriage of Elizabeth Cady and Henry Brewster Stanton and the Development of Reform Politics A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Linda Christine Frank 2012 © Copyright by Linda Christine Frank 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION A Family Affair: The Marriage of Elizabeth Cady and Henry Brewster Stanton and the Development of Reform Politics by Linda Christine Frank Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Ellen C. DuBois, Chair Although devoted to insuring universal freedom and human rights for more than 60 years, Henry B. Stanton’s historical legacy and his many contributions to antebellum reform have been obscured and even vilified in the shadows of his famous wife, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and his oftentimes tactical opponent within abolition circles, William Lloyd Garrison. Frequently portrayed as the antagonist in his wife’s struggle for women’s rights, as a husband and a father Henry Stanton has become synonymous in the historical discourse with the very oppression his wife devoted her life to ending. Because of this, Elizabeth’s reformism is frequently depicted as having emerged from an imagined unhappy domestic life, rather than from an awareness of social and political inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • “Blessings of Liberty” for All: Lysander Spooner's Originalism
    SECURING THE “BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY” FOR ALL: LYSANDER SPOONER’S ORIGINALISM Helen J. Knowles* ABSTRACT On January 1, 1808, legislation made it illegal to import slaves into the United States.1 Eighteen days later, in Athol, Massachusetts, Ly- sander Spooner was born. In terms of their influence on the abolition of * Assistant Professor of Political Science, State University of New York at Oswego; B.A., Liverpool Hope University College; Ph.D., Boston University. This article draws on material from papers presented at the annual meetings of the Northeastern Political Science Association and the New England Historical Association, and builds on ideas originally discussed at the Institute for Constitutional Studies (ICS) Summer Seminar on Slavery and the Constitution and an Institute for Humane Studies An- nual Research Colloquium. For their input on my arguments about Lysander Spooner’s constitutional theory, I am grateful to Nigel Ashford, David Mayers, Jim Schmidt, and Mark Silverstein. Special thanks go to Randy Barnett who, several years ago, introduced me to Spooner, the “crusty old character” (as someone once described him to me) with whom I have since embarked on a fascinating historical journey into constitutional theory. I am also indebted to the ICS seminar participants (particularly Paul Finkelman, Maeva Marcus, and Mark Tushnet) for their comments and suggestions and to the participants in the Liberty Fund workshop on Lysander Spooner’s theories (particularly Michael Kent Curtis and Larry Solum) for prompting me to think about Spooner’s work in a variety of different ways. Finally, I would like to thank the staff of the American Antiquarian Society, the Rare Books Department of the Boston Public Library, and the Houghton Library and University Archives at Harvard University for their excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln and the Abolitionists Allen C
    History Faculty Publications History Fall 2000 Lincoln and the Abolitionists Allen C. Guelzo Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac Part of the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. The definitive version was published as Guelzo, Allen C. "Lincoln and the Abolitionists," The iW lson Quarterly, 8(2000), 58-70. This is the authors's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac/1 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lincoln and the Abolitionists Abstract It has always been one of the ironies of the era of the Civil War and the end of slavery in the United States that the man who played the role of Great Emancipator of the slaves was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of more than three million black slaves in the Emancipation Proclamation, has never entirely shaken off the er putation of being something of a half-heart about it. [excerpt] Disciplines History | United States History This article is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac/1 5. "FIENDS...FACING ZIONWARDS": ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S RELUCTANT EMBRACE OF THE ABOLITIONISTS It has always been one of the ironies of the era of the Civil War and the end of slavery in the United States that the man who played the role of Great Emancipator of the slaves was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Slavery Movement in the Presbyterian Church, 1835-1861
    This dissertation has been 62-778 microfilmed exactly as received HOWARD, Victor B., 1915- THE ANTI-SLAVERY MOVEMENT IN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 1835-1861. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1961 History, modem University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE ANTI-SLAVERY MOVEMENT IN THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 1835-1861 DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University 9r Victor B, Howard, A. B., A. M. ****** The Ohio State University 1961 Approved by Adviser Department of History CONTENTS Chapter Page I The Division of 1837. .................. 1 II The Church Crystallizes Its Position On Slavery............. 89 III The Impact of the Fugitive Slave Law Upon the Church ........................... 157 IV Political Controversy and Division. .... 181 V The Presbyterian Church and the American Home Missionary Society........... 222 VI Anti-Slavery Literature and the Tract S o c i e t y ................................... 252 VII Foreign Missions and Slavery Problems . 265 VIII A Northwestern Seminary ................. 290 IX Crisis of 1 8 6 1 . ................. 309 Bibliography............................... 342 Autobiography..................................... 378 il CHAPTER I THE DIVISION OF 1837 In 1824 in central western New York, Charles G. Finney began a career in ministry that was to have far- reaching implications for the religious as well as the civil life of the people of the United States. In July of that year he was ordained by the Presbytery of St. Lawrence, and assigned as a missionary to the little towns of Evans Mills and Antwerp in Jefferson County, New York. Under the vivid preaching of this ex-lawyer a wave of revivalism began to sweep through the whole region.^ Following the revival of 1824-27, Finney carried the religious awakening into Philadelphia, New York City, and Rochester, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • A House History
    8 Center Street “THECORNERS” Siasconset A House History Written By Betsy Tyler Designed By Eileen Powers THE NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST 2 Union Street Nantucket, Massachusetts www.nantucketpreservation.org Meerheim with new shingles,c.1889,painting by R.Way Smith Hannah B. Sharp 1885–1912 Dorothy Sharp Richmond 1912–1923 annah Sharp (1824–1912),widow of Benjamin Sharp of Philadelphia,occu- pied the house at 8 Center Street during the height of ’Sconset’sheyday as the meccaforasophisticatedbutfun-lovingsummercrowd,whohelpedtoestablish Hthe railroad, the Chapel, and the Casino.The popularity of the village led to real estate developmentnorthandsouthoftheoriginalfishinghamlet,andfilledthebighotelsand the little cottages with families from the major cities along the eastern seaboard. Hannah Sharp rented the cottage at 8 Center Street for the summer of 1885, and purchased it that September. Invitation to the hanging of the crane, 1885 Page from Meerheim guest book,1886 Hannah and her daughter, Mabel, named their cottage Meerheim, German for “ocean home,”and they kept a guest book in 1886 and 1887 that recorded visitors.The dedica- tion of Meerheim on June 28,1886,coincided with a meeting of the Nantucket Sorosis Club,aliteraryandphilosophicalsisterhoodwhoeducatedoneanotherwithdiscussions of literary topics.The Inquirer and Mirror reported the meeting: On Monday, June 28th, Sorosis was invited to meet with Mrs. Benjamin Sharp at her new cottage at Siasconset.Pleasant weather always lends inspiration to an out- of-town excursion,and this was one of the perfect days.So on the 10 o’clock train the happy band sped their way across the plain, by the placid sea, and were soon wel- comed by the kindly hostess within the cozy dwelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolitionists Were Bullied from a Case Study Christian Philanthropists in Britain the Moment They First Stuck Their and America Got Deeply Involved Heads Up
    here have been principled Leaders of the charity brilliantly objections to slavery for orchestrated massive shifts in Tas long as there has been public sentiment. slavery—which is to say, from the first days of human history. Organizing culture change But hatred of enslavement didn’t Culture change is not for cowards, become a mass conviction until and abolitionists were bullied from A case study Christian philanthropists in Britain the moment they first stuck their and America got deeply involved heads up. Changing Society through Civil Action in popular campaigns to expose As part of their broader effort to slavery as an ugly, immoral, and refine Americans through worship, sinful activity, utterly incompatible education, discussion, and service, with life in a free land. This was Arthur and Lewis Tappan had in demanding and dangerous work 1832 leased a tatterdemalion old that required guile, endurance, theater in lower Manhattan and commitment, courage, managerial converted it into a church. The genius, and money. The movement building “squatted in the midst 64 got all of these things from leaders of the slums” next to Five Points, Abolition like Arthur and Lewis Tappan. a neighborhood notorious for Fired by their deep evangelical its gangs and grog shops. During Christian convictions, the Tappan recent years the theater had been brothers were leading providers of home to a circus, and with his strategy and funding to the cause sharp nose for drama and public of abolishing slavery. (They also interest, Lewis noted that “the powered many other important sensation produced by converting social reforms. For some biography the place with slight alterations on the men, see the last third of into a church will be very great, the case study on the Second Great and curiousity will be excited.” Awakening.) Arthur was the lead The Tappans placed their funder and visionary, and Lewis the Chatham Street Chapel at the vital organizer, behind creation of disposal of Charles Grandison the American Anti-Slavery Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Weld-Grimké Family Papers Writer Index
    Weld-Grimké Family Papers William L. Clements Library Correspondence: Writer Index The University of Michigan Finding aid: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsead/umich-wcl-M-400wel?view=text Aaron, Samuel • 1844 August 3 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld) Abbot, Ezra, 1819-1884 • 1880 August 12 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld) Adams and Co. • 1866 December 12 (to [Sarah Moore Grimké?]) Adams, John Quincy • 1871 July 8 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld) Adams, Nancy • 1838 March 30 (to Sarah & Angelina Grimké) Aldrich, Alfreda • 1877 October 7 (to [Sarah Weld Hamilton])* Allan, William T. (see joint letters under Lyman, Huntington; and Wells, Samuel) Allan, Willam T. joint letter with Alvord, John Watson, 1807-1880 Streeter, Sereno Wright Thome, James Armstrong, 1813-1873 • 1836 August 9 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld)** Allan, William Thomas • 1879 November 3 (to [Theodore Dwight Weld]) Alvord, John Watson, 1807-1880 (see joint letters under Allan, William T.; Thome, James Armstrong) • 1838 August 29-September 1 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld)** American Anti-Slavery Society • 1838 August 16 (to T[heodore] D[wight] Weld) • [1839 August 15] (to Theodore D[wight] Weld)** American Anti-Slavery Society. Committee of Arrangements • 1836 March 10 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld)** • 1836 April 21 (to Theodore D[wight] Weld)** * Indicates letters acquired as part of the Clements Library's 2012 Weld-Grimké Family Papers acquisition. ** Indicates letters published in Gilbert H. Barnes and Dwight L. Dumond, eds. Letters of Theodore Dwight Weld, Angelina Grimké Weld, and Sarah Grimké (NY: Appleton-Century, 1934). American Anti-Slavery Society. Executive Committee • 1839 September 16 (to Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of Political Abolitionism, the Liberty Party, 1839-1848
    THEY TOOK THE VAN1 TEN YEARS OF POLITICAL ABOLITIONISM, THE LIBERTY PARTY, 18.39-1848 A Thesis Presented to the F~culty of the School of Social Science Morehead State University In Partial }'ulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History by Doris Lynn Koch May 1969 Accepted by the faculty of.the School of Social Scienoe, Morehead State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in History .degree. ) 'I I Director Master's Chairman ... TABLE OF CONTENTS . PAGE INTRODUCTION I I I I O I I I I I .._, .. • . .. · •·. • . 1 CHAPTER I. PETITIONING AND QUESTIONING FAI~ • • • • • • 5 II. UNITY FRml DIVISION • , , , • • , , , • • • , 17 III, EARLY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LIBERTY PAR~Y • • 101 IV, A TRIO OF CArlDIDATES: THE ELECTION OF 1844 135 V. THE PARTY IN TRANSITION • •. , • • , , • • • . 158 . VI, THE LIBERTY PARTY IN DECLINE, , , , , • , , 181 ASSESSMENT OF THE LIBERTY PARTY , , , , , . , , , , , 213 BIBLIOGRAPHY . - . • • • .• . 220 ·- INTRODUCTION Panaticsl Disunionistsl Foolsl Such epithets were bailed at the men who from 1830 to 1860'labored tor the emancipation of the American Negro, The history of the Liberty party forms a chapter in the lengthy narrative of abolitionism, Throughout the history of civilization, men have found that by banding together and promoting their particular cause in the bounds of fellowship, their chances for success are greatly enhanced, Abolitionists did not form a coherent group until December 4, 1833, when deliberations in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
    [Show full text]
  • Racism in Antebellum Vermont
    Racism in Antebellum Vermont Neither Vermont’s constitutional prohibition of adult slavery nor Judge Theophilus Harrington’s famous application of that provision ever really precluded the Green Mountain State from those expressions of racism that existed all over New England and beyond. By John M. Lovejoy wo historical events appear to have established Vermont’s re- sponse to questions about slavery and the existence of racism Tin the state. The first occurred in Windsor in July 1777, when the Vermont Constitution was adopted. It was the first state constitution to declare adult slavery unlawful within its borders. The second event took place in Middlebury at the Addison County Court House in June 1804, when the Honorable Theophilus Harrington, junior member of the three- judge Supreme Court panel, speaking for the court, declared that slave ownership in Vermont could only be proved by the production in evi- dence of a bill of sale for the slave signed by Almighty God, Himself. The court’s practical application of the law prohibiting slavery set for- ever the height of the “bar” over which challengers would have to jump. From that day forward no jumpers applied. The original thirteen colonies had a substantial accumulation of laws on their books, as well as spoken and unspoken codes, relating to ne- groes, mulattos, and Indians and, in several instances, to slavery itself.1 Vermont patterned a substantial portion of its constitution after that of Pennsylvania.2 However, because Vermont lawmakers were relatively unburdened by an existing legal history and its accompanying tapestry of laws, codes, and precedent-setting opinions, the drafting of the Ver- mont Constitution was a simpler process than in most of the other states.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulman, Pp 73-76, Gives Story of Elizur Wright in US, 1840S
    ACTUARY HALL OF FAME: ELIZUR WRIGHT Elizur Wright must be counted among the most famous actuaries of all times. Here is his entry from The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001. Elizur Wright, 1804–85, American actuary and antislavery leader, born near Canaan, Connecticut, graduated Yale, 1826. He taught (1829–33) mathematics at Western Reserve College. In 1833 he became corresponding secretary of the American Anti-Slavery Society, a post he left (1839) to assume editorship of the Massachusetts Abolitionist. While editing (1846–52) the Boston Weekly Chronotype he became interested in life insurance reform and began lobbying in the Massachusetts legislature. Through his efforts an act was passed (1858) compelling insurance companies to hold reserve funds to be applied against policies. Two later rulings—the nonforfeiture law of 1861 forbidding a company to appropriate the reserve funds and the legislation (1880) that requires companies to pay in cash the value of lapsed policies—were also directly due to Wright. He served (1858–66) as state supervisor for insurance legislation before taking positions as a private actuary. His vigorous campaigning in this field as well as his development of actuarial tabulations earned him the title “father of life insurance.” This little piece falls far short of doing justice to Wright’s contributions. The work of Halley (1600s) and Price (1700s) set up the mathematical basis for insurance, but those ideas did not extend to the notion of managing a large insurance firm. The concept of a reserve was not obvious, and it took people like Elizur Wright to force the ideas on insurance firms.
    [Show full text]