DB-Konzern Unsere Flotten Und Netzwerke 2016 ◊ ◊ ◊ DB-Konzern
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(A) DB Cargo (UK) Limited Whose Registered Office Is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); And
1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows; (a) DB Cargo (UK) Limited whose Registered Office is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN (“Network Rail”) (“The Respondent”). (c) Contact details for DB Cargo: Graham White, Access Manager South, Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN. (d) Contact details for Network Rail: Duncan Lovatt & Richard Hooper, Network Rail, Wales Route. 2 DETAILS OF REFERENCE 2.1 This matter is referred to a Timetable Panel (“the Panel”) for determination in accordance with Condition D5 of the Network Code 2.2 This Dispute arises from a decision of Network Rail in respect of Network Rail variations made pursuant to Condition D3.5 of the Network Code 3 CONTENTS OF REFERENCE This Sole Reference includes: - (a) The subject matter of the dispute in Section 4; (b) A detailed explanation of the issues in dispute in Section 5; (c) In Section 6, the decision sought from the panel in respect of legal entitlement. 4 SUBJECT MATTER OF DISPUTE 4.1 This dispute arises from the Late Notice Restrictions of Use between Stoke Gifford No 2/ Caldicot and Leckwith Loop North Jn from 0200 on Saturday 19th October to 0420 on Monday 21st October 2019. Possession Reference P2019/2680990 4.2 Copied and annexed to this Reference are: • Appendix A: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (original) [Part] • Appendix B: Re-Issued request 157-W30-WA19 1 • Appendix C: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (subsequent re-issue) [Part] • Appendix D: Decision document for Re-Issued request 157-WA30-WA19 [Part] • Appendix E: Works planned within the restriction of use. -
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular. -
Network Rail Response with Appendices
Defendant’s Response to Sole Reference Ref: TTP1546 1 of 9 1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows:- (a) Freightliner Limited whose Registered Office is at 3rd Floor, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ (“Freightliner”) ("the Claimant"); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN ("Network Rail") ("the Defendant"). 1.2 Other Train and Freight Operating Companies that could be affected by the outcome of this dispute: (a) Greater Anglia (Abellio East Anglia Ltd), MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Ltd, Arriva Rail London Ltd, GB Railfreight Ltd, DB Cargo (UK) Ltd, c2c (Trenitalia c2c Ltd) 2 CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT This Response to the Claimant’s Sole Reference includes:- (a) Confirmation, or qualification, that the subject matter of the dispute is as set out by the Claimant in its Sole Reference, in the form of a summary schedule cross-referenced to the issues raised by the Claimant in the Sole Reference, identifying which the Defendant agrees with and which it disagrees with. (b) A detailed explanation of the Defendant’s arguments in support of its position on those issues where it disagrees with the Claimant’s Sole Reference, including references to documents or contractual provisions not dealt with in the Claimant’s Sole Reference. (c) Any further related issues not raised by the Claimant but which the Defendant considers fall to be determined as part of the dispute; (d) The decisions of principle sought from the Panel in respect of (i) legal entitlement, and (ii) remedies; (e) Appendices and other supporting material. -
Streckenkarte Regionalverkehr Rheinland-Pfalz / Saarland
Streckenkarte Regionalverkehr Rheinland-Pfalz / Saarland Niederschelden Siegen Mudersbach VGWS FreusburgBrachbach Siedlung Eiserfeld (Sieg) Niederschelden Nord Köln ten: Kirchen or Betzdorf w Au (Sieg) ir ant Geilhausen Hohegrete Etzbach Köln GrünebacherhütteGrünebachSassenroth OrtKönigsstollenHerdorf Dillenburg agen – w Breitscheidt WissenNiederhövels (Sieg)Scheuerfeld Alsdorf Sie fr Schutzbach “ Bonn Hbf Bonn Kloster Marienthal Niederdreisbach ehr Köln Biersdorf Bahnhof verk Obererbach Biersdorf Ort Bonn-Bad Godesberg Daaden 0180 t6 „Na 99h 66 33* Altenkirchen (Ww) or Bonn-Mehlem Stichw /Anruf Rolandseck Unkel Büdingen (Ww) Hattert Oberwinter Ingelbach Enspel /Anruf aus dem Festnetz, HachenburgUnnau-Korb Bad BodendorfRemagen Erpel (Rhein) *20 ct Ahrweiler Markt Heimersheim Rotenhain Bad Neuenahr Walporzheim Linz (Rhein) Ahrweiler bei Mobilfunk max. 60 ct Nistertal-Bad MarienbergLangenhahn VRS Dernau Rech Leubsdorf (Rhein) Westerburg Willmenrod Mayschoß Sinzig Berzhahn Altenahr Bad Hönningen Wilsenroth Kreuzberg (Ahr) Bad Breisig Rheinbrohl Siershahn Frickhofen Euskirchen Ahrbrück Wirges Niederzeuzheim Brohl Leutesdorf NeuwiedEngers Dernbach Hadamar Köln MontabaurGoldhausenGirod Steinefrenz Niederhadamar Namedy Elz Andernach Vallendar Weißenthurm Urmitz Rheinbrücke Staffel Miesenheim Dreikirchen Elz Süd Plaidt Niedererbach Jünkerath Mendig KO-Lützel Limburg (Lahn) KO-Ehrenbreitstein Diez Ost Gießen UrmitzKO-Stadtmitte Thür Kruft Diez Eschhofen Lissendorf Kottenheim KO-Güls Niederlahnstein Lindenholzhausen Winningen (Mosel) BalduinsteinFachingen -
Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry
Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner Global Competitiveness in the Rail and Transit Industry Michael Renner and Gary Gardner September 2010 2 GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE RAIL AND TRANSIT INDUSTRY © 2010 Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C. Printed on paper that is 50 percent recycled, 30 percent post-consumer waste, process chlorine free. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Worldwatch Institute; of its directors, officers, or staff; or of its funding organizations. Editor: Lisa Mastny Designer: Lyle Rosbotham Table of Contents 3 Table of Contents Summary . 7 U.S. Rail and Transit in Context . 9 The Global Rail Market . 11 Selected National Experiences: Europe and East Asia . 16 Implications for the United States . 27 Endnotes . 30 Figures and Tables Figure 1. National Investment in Rail Infrastructure, Selected Countries, 2008 . 11 Figure 2. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, Share of World Market, 2001 . 15 Figure 3. Leading Global Rail Equipment Manufacturers, by Sales, 2009 . 15 Table 1. Global Passenger and Freight Rail Market, by Region and Major Industry Segment, 2005–2007 Average . 12 Table 2. Annual Rolling Stock Markets by Region, Current and Projections to 2016 . 13 Table 3. Profiles of Major Rail Vehicle Manufacturers . 14 Table 4. Employment at Leading Rail Vehicle Manufacturing Companies . 15 Table 5. Estimate of Needed European Urban Rail Investments over a 20-Year Period . 17 Table 6. German Rail Manufacturing Industry Sales, 2006–2009 . 18 Table 7. Germany’s Annual Investments in Urban Mass Transit, 2009 . 19 Table 8. -
Heute Sollen Wieder 2.000 Tonnen Sicher Ankommen
*OIBMU Vorwort . 7 Hinweise . 8 Marktübersicht Europa . 10 VDV-Kooperationsbörse Schienengüterverkehr . 18 Check! Einkaufsführer . 21 Marktstudie: Europäische Bahnen Albanien . 28 Belgien . 32 Bosnien und Herzegovina . 46 Bulgarien . 52 Dänemark . 62 Deutschland . 78 Estland . .552 Finnland . .570 shͲtĂŐĞŶŵĞŝƐƚĞƌ ŚƌŝƐƟĂŶĞĐŬĞƌĨƌĞƵƚƐŝĐŚ ƺďĞƌĚŝĞhŶƚĞƌƐƚƺƚnjƵŶŐ ĚƵƌĐŚĚĂƐZĂŝůtĂƚĐŚͲ Heute sollen wieder 2.000 ^LJƐƚĞŵďĞŝƐĞŝŶĞƌ ƚćŐůŝĐŚĞŶƌďĞŝƚ͘ Tonnen sicher ankommen. Mit System zu mehr Sicherheit. Räder, Bremssohlen, Überladungen u.v.m. detailliert auf Knopfdruck ĞůĞŬƚƌŽŶŝƐĐŚƺďĞƌŵŝƩĞůƚ͘DŝƚƵŶƐĞƌĞŶtĂŐŽŶͲ^ĐĂŶͲ^LJƐƚĞŵĞŶnjƵƌ &ĂŚƌnjĞƵŐĚŝĂŐŶŽƐĞǀŽŶ'ƺƚĞƌǁĂŐĞŶŬĞŝŶĞsŝƐŝŽŶ͕ƐŽŶĚĞƌŶZĞĂůŝƚćƚ͘ DŝƚĚŝĞƐĞƌŝŶŶŽǀĂƟǀĞŶ>ƂƐƵŶŐ ŚĂďĞŶǁŝƌĞŝŶƵŐĞĂƵĨĚŝĞ ^ŝĐŚĞƌŚĞŝƚŝŵ'ƺƚĞƌǀĞƌŬĞŚƌ͘ WIR HABEN EIN AUGE DARAUF www.rail-watch.com &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh *OIBMU Frankreich . 576 Griechenland . 612 Irland . 620 Italien . 626 Kroatien . 684 Lettland . 692 Litauen . 706 Luxemburg . 728 Mazedonien. 736 Montenegro. 742 Niederlande. 748 Norwegen . 780 Österreich . 790 Polen . 844 Portugal . 952 Rumänien . 958 &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh *OIBMU Schweden . .990 Schweiz . .1026 Serbien . .1082 Slowakei . .1092 Slowenien . .1116 Spanien . .1122 Tschechien. .1150 Türkei. .1202 Ungarn . .1208 Vereinigtes Königreich . .1236 Anhang Firmenindex. .1282 Personenindex . .1303 Abkürzungen . .1350 5$,/&21=(37 /ŚƌWĂƌƚŶĞƌŝŵŝƐĞŶďĂŚŶďĞƚƌŝĞď ŝůĚƵŶŐƐƚƌćŐĞƌ͘ƌďĞŝƚƐƐĐŚƵƚnj͘ĞƌĂƚƵŶŐ ǁǁǁ͘ƌĂŝůĐŽŶnjĞƉƚ͘ĚĞ͘ϬϱϬϯϭͬϵϲϬϭϳϭϯ͘ŝŶĨŽΛƌĂŝůĐŽŶnjĞƉƚ͘ĚĞ &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh 7PSXPSU Liebe Leser, Sie halten die mittlerweile zehnte Ausgabe des -
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic ......................................................................................................... -
DB Schenker - the Transportation and Logistics Division of Deutsche Bahn
DB Schenker - The Transportation and Logistics Division of Deutsche Bahn DB Mobility Logistics AG Transportation and Logistics Dirk Scheers, director sales & key accounts Agenda1 Transportation and Logistics division DB Schenker Logistics DB Schenker Rail 2020 Strategy NGe S Next Generati on E services DB Schenker Belgium Overview of revenues, EBIT and employees of DB and its business units 2014 Revenues 2014 (m € ) EBIT 2014 (m €) Employees 2014 [fte2] DB Bahn Long Distance 4,034 212 16,461 DB Bahn Regional 8,831 843 36,605 DB Arriva 4,,9491 265 45,712 DB Schenker Rail 4,863 46 30,842 DB Schenker Logistics 14,943 332 64,810 DB Netze Track 4,951 562 43,382 DB Netze Stations 1,172 240 4,867 DB Netze Energy 2, 797 55 1, 770 DB Services 3,172 82 25,476 1 39,720 2,109 295,763 As of December 31, 2014; 1 Difference between total for divisions and DB Group due to other activities/consolidation (revenues, EBIT) and other (employees); 2 full time equivalent A rail freight company operating in Germany has become a ggplobal transportation and lo ggpgistics group Until 2001 Today National Global transportation and logistics rail freight network network Acquisitions, organic growth 19.8 EUR bn1 revenue Solutions along the whole 3.5 EUR bn revenue logistics chain Rail freight network Global network with intermodal Primarily national services services 1 As of 31.12.2014 DB Schenker Logistics offers global transport and logistics solutions – onshore, by sea and in the air DB Schenker Logistics Employees: 64, 051 Revenues (EUR): 14.9 bn EBIT (EUR): 335 -
Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the Online Report for Downloading
Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the online report for downloading 1 Note: These are the texts of the Sustainability Report 2009, which are being made available in this file for archival purposes. The Sustainability Report was designed for an Internet presentation. Thus, for example, related links are shown only on the Internet in order to ensure that the report can be kept up-to-date over the next two years until the next report is due. Where appropriate, graphics are offered on the Internet in better quality than in this document in order to reduce the size of the file downloaded. 2 Table of Contents 1 Our company 6 1.1 Preface .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Corporate Culture................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Confidence..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Values ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Dialog ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3.1 Stakeholder dialogs 10 1.2.3.2 Memberships 12 1.2.3.3 Environmental dialog 14 1.3 Strategy ................................................................................................................................ -
IRG-Rail (14) 2A - Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report
Independent Regulators’ Group – Rail IRG–Rail Annexes to the 2nd IRG-Rail Annual Market Monitoring Report 27 February 2014 IRG-Rail (14) 2a - Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report Index 1. Country sheets market structure.................................................................................2 2. Common list of definitions and indicators .................................................................11 3. Graphs not used in the report...................................................................................14 1 IRG-Rail (14) 2a - Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report 1. Country sheets market structure Regulatory Authority: Schienen-Control GmbH Country: Austria Date of legal liberalisation of : Freight railway market: 9 January 1998. Passenger railway market: 9 January 1998. Date of entry of first new entrant into market: Freight: 1 April 2001. Passenger: 14 December 2003. Ownership structure Freight RCA: 100% public Lokomotion: 30% DB Schenker, 70% various institutions with public ownership WLC: 100% public LTE: 100% public (was 50% private, new partner to be announced soon) Logserv: 100% private TXL: 100% public (Trenitalia) GySEV: 93.8% public SLB, STB, GKB, MBS: 100% public RTS: 100% private RPS: 100% private Passenger ÖBB PV 100% public WLB, GKB, StLB, MBS, StH, SLB: 100% public CAT: 49.9% ÖBB PV, 50.1% Vienna Airport (public majority) WESTbahn: 74% private, 26% public (SNCF Voyages) Regulatory Authority: Rail Market Regulatory Agency Country: Croatia Date of legal liberalisation of : Freight railway market: 1 January 2005. Passenger railway market: 1 January 2005. Date of entry of first new entrant into market: Freight: no new entrant. Passenger: no new entrant. Ownership structure Freight 100% public Passenger 100% public 2 IRG-Rail (14) 2a - Annexes to the Annual Market Monitoring Report Regulatory Authority: Danish Rail Regulatory Body Country: Denmark Date of legal liberalisation of : Freight railway market: Beginning June 27th 1997. -
Deutsche Bahn Im Verfolgungswahn Fahrgasterlebnisse Bei Fahrscheinkontrollen
Thema Deutsche Bahn im Verfolgungswahn Fahrgasterlebnisse bei Fahrscheinkontrollen Keine Beratung – kein Verkauf: Realität auf den Bahnsteigen. Wer damit nicht zurechtkommt, wird von der DB als Schwarzfahrer verfolgt. ➢ Die Berichte von Fahrgästen über unberechtigte Personalien wurden aufgenommen. Frage: Warum werde ich und unangemessene Reaktionen von Zugbegleitern kriminalisiert, wenn die DB Personal spart und ich gleichzeitig und Kontrollpersonal der Deutschen Bahn AG häufen die Funktion des Verkäufers übernehmen muss und ich damit sich, seitdem die DB in vielen Bundesländern den nicht zurecht komme? Fahrscheinverkauf in den Regionalzügen eingestellt Maria S. aus S. (Bayern) am 15.05.2007 hat. Es sind keine Einzelfälle mehr, die auf „mensch- liches Versagen“ oder auf ein unglückliches Zusam- $! Fahrscheinkauf oft unmöglich mentreffen verschiedener Vorstellungen von Fahr- gästen und Personal zurückzuführen sind. Es sieht Seitdem der Fahrscheinverkauf in bayerischen Regionalzügen alles danach aus, als gäben die Mitarbeiter der DB eingestellt wurde, ärgere ich mich bei fast jeder Fahrt. Ich den Druck, dem sie selbst vonseiten der Unterneh- selber bin glücklicherweise bis jetzt nicht betroffen gewesen, mensführung der DB ausgesetzt sind, an die Fahr- beobachte aber häufig, wie unfreundlich andere Fahrgäste gäste weiter. Wir lassen Betroffene, die sich in behandelt werden und wie leicht man aus Versehen oder der Regel über den PRO BAHN-Kummerkasten Unwissen in die Situation gerät, ohne gültigen Fahrschein (www.pro-bahn.de/meinung) gemeldet haben, dazustehen. zu Wort kommen. Eine häufige Beobachtung: Gelegenheitsfahrgäste benutzen manchmal versehentlich ein Bayernticket vor 9 Uhr. In der Vergangenheit wurde in solchen Fällen einfach noch ein l# Warum werde ich kriminalisiert? Zusatzfahrschein verkauft, um die Zeit bis 9 Uhr abzudecken. -
Responses to Consultation on PR18 Draft Determination - Non Network Rail (A - L) Stakeholder PDF Pack Page Number Abellio UK (Abellio) 2 Councillor Adam Brookes 6 Mr
Responses to consultation on PR18 draft determination - non Network Rail (A - L) Stakeholder PDF pack Page number Abellio UK (Abellio) 2 Councillor Adam Brookes 6 Mr. Adam Stead (Apollo Rail Ltd) 11 Aggregate Industries 15 Angel Trains Ltd 19 Arriva UK Trains Ltd (main consultation response) 21 Arriva UK Trains Ltd (licence consultation response) 29 Aslef 32 Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport 42 XC Trains Ltd (CrossCountry) 44 DB Cargo (main consultation response) 46 DB Cargo (licence consultation response) 59 Department for Transport (DfT) 63 (main consultation response) Department for Transport (DfT) 82 (licence consultation response) Drax Power Limited (Drax) 87 East Coast Mainline Authorities 91 First Group 93 Freight on Rail 104 Freight Transport Association (FTA) 115 Freightliner Group (main consultation response) 118 Freightliner Group (licence consultation response) 130 Friends of the Far North Line 132 GB Railfreight (GBRf) 133 GO-OP Co-operative Railway Limited (GO-OP) 137 Grand Central Railway Company (Grand Central) 139 Grand Union Trains (Grand Union) 142 Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) 151 Mr. Jonathan Tyler (Passenger Transport Networks) 157 Kent County Council 161 London North Eastern Railway Limited(LNER) 165 Page 1 of 1 PR18 draft determination consultation: pro forma This pro forma is available to those that wish to use it to respond to our draft determination consultation, structured around the main areas of the draft determination. Other forms of response (e.g. letter format) are equally welcome, though we would be grateful if these could be structured broadly in line with the areas listed below (where you wish to comment), to aid our review of responses.