DOCSLIB.ORG

Responses to Consultation on PR18 Draft Determination - Non Network Rail (A - L) Stakeholder PDF Pack Page Number Abellio UK (Abellio) 2 Councillor Adam Brookes 6 Mr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Responses to Consultation on PR18 Draft Determination - Non Network Rail (A - L) Stakeholder PDF Pack Page Number Abellio UK (Abellio) 2 Councillor Adam Brookes 6 Mr Responses to consultation on PR18 draft determination - non Network Rail (A - L) Stakeholder PDF pack Page number Abellio UK (Abellio) 2 Councillor Adam Brookes 6 Mr. Adam Stead (Apollo Rail Ltd) 11 Aggregate Industries 15 Angel Trains Ltd 19 Arriva UK Trains Ltd (main consultation response) 21 Arriva UK Trains Ltd (licence consultation response) 29 Aslef 32 Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport 42 XC Trains Ltd (CrossCountry) 44 DB Cargo (main consultation response) 46 DB Cargo (licence consultation response) 59 Department for Transport (DfT) 63 (main consultation response) Department for Transport (DfT) 82 (licence consultation response) Drax Power Limited (Drax) 87 East Coast Mainline Authorities 91 First Group 93 Freight on Rail 104 Freight Transport Association (FTA) 115 Freightliner Group (main consultation response) 118 Freightliner Group (licence consultation response) 130 Friends of the Far North Line 132 GB Railfreight (GBRf) 133 GO-OP Co-operative Railway Limited (GO-OP) 137 Grand Central Railway Company (Grand Central) 139 Grand Union Trains (Grand Union) 142 Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) 151 Mr. Jonathan Tyler (Passenger Transport Networks) 157 Kent County Council 161 London North Eastern Railway Limited(LNER) 165 Page 1 of 1 PR18 draft determination consultation: pro forma This pro forma is available to those that wish to use it to respond to our draft determination consultation, structured around the main areas of the draft determination. Other forms of response (e.g. letter format) are equally welcome, though we would be grateful if these could be structured broadly in line with the areas listed below (where you wish to comment), to aid our review of responses. Please send your response to [email protected] by 31 August 2018. Full name Rebecca Holding Job title* Head of Infrastructure, Access Management and Strategy Organisation Abellio UK Email* *This information will not be published on our website. Please see Appendix B of our overview document for details on how we will treat information provided to us as part of this consultation. Our approach to producing Network Rail’s determination and to regulating Network Rail in CP6 For further information, please see chapters 2 and 3 of our overview document. We support the RDG response but would like to draw emphasis to the below points: As a public sector body; how does ORR plan to effectively regulate and penalise Network Rail when appropriate? We endorse the requirement for the System Operator to be well resourced. We would welcome clarity on how the System Operator and Routes will be regulated simultaneously; particularly to avoid finger-pointing internally within Network Rail. Our review of Network Rail’s network licence Further information, see paragraphs 3.59-3.63 of our overview document and our supporting document on our review of the Network Rail’s network licence. This also contains a set of questions that we would welcome your views on. We support the ORR proposal to update the Network License to better reflect the structure of Network Rail and CP6 regulatory framework. We endorse the RDG response; however, we do not believe the stakeholder engagement requirements are too prescriptive. We agree with the proposed changes to the management incentives condition; we believe ORR should make it optional for Network Rail to continue to have a management incentive scheme. Our review of Network Rail’s stakeholder engagement For further information, please see chapter 4 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on stakeholder engagement. We support the principle of ORR’s not being overly prescriptive in terms of exact requirements for stakeholder engagement (we don’t believe this to be the case in the DD), however, we would like to understand how the scorecards will feature in the evaluation of Network Rail’s engagement, particularly in scorecard metrics that have failed to be agreed. We would like to understand what interventions will be made, should the ORR feel that Network Rail have not adequately engaged with Train Operators; given that this is a subjective measure that could be applied inconsistently across Network Rail Routes. Our review of Network Rail’s scorecards and requirements For further information, please see chapter 5 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on scorecards and requirements. We believe the performance trajectories provided by Network Rail that failed to gain agreement from Abellio operators were unambitious and lacked engagement at an early stage to ensure Operator plans were adequately reflected. This has still yet to be progressed to an acceptable level. Considering Network Rail’s deteriorating performance over recent years, we question whether the ‘floor’ for breach of regulatory targets should be set slightly higher? Also, the potential for inclusion of a ‘trigger’ to allow accurate monitoring against current performance levels. Our assessment of health and safety For further information, please see chapter 6 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on health and safety. We support the ORR proposals in this area. Our review of Network Rail’s proposed costs and income For further information, please see chapter 7 of our overview document and our related supplementary documents on our review of Network Rail’s proposed costs and its other single till income. We support ORR’s findings in this area. The financial framework for CP6 and affordability For further information, please see chapter 8 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on the financial framework. We support the budgetary flexibility that has been outlined for CP6, with the view that this will drive efficiencies. We have concerns regarding how ORR will regulate and measure volume and efficiency of expenditure and would like further clarity on how ORR proposes to manage this. We endorse the movement of £0.9bn risk funding from the centre to the Routes allowing further devolution and accountability. Charges and contractual incentives in CP6 For further information, please see chapter of 9 of our overview document. We have also published related supplementary documents on: our overall charges and incentives decisions, our proposals on the variable usage charge for CP6 and our proposals on infrastructure cost charges. We support the comments made by ORR in this area and have no further comment. Comments on our supporting annex to the Scotland summary, the draft settlements for the Freight & National Passenger Operator route and the System Operator (SO), or England & Wales route documents For further information, please see the Scotland summary, FNPO draft settlement document, and SO draft settlement document. Our other route review documents are here. Scotland No further comment. Freight & National Passenger Operator route System Operator No further comment. England & Wales routes No further comment. Any other points that you would like to make Thank you for taking the time to respond. PR18 draft determination consultation: pro forma This pro forma is available to those that wish to use it to respond to our draft determination consultation, structured around the main areas of the draft determination. Other forms of response (e.g. letter format) are equally welcome, though we would be grateful if these could be structured broadly in line with the areas listed below (where you wish to comment), to aid our review of responses. Please send your response to [email protected] by 31 August 2018. Full name Cllr Adam Brookes Job title* N/A Organisation None Email* *This information will not be published on our website. Please see Appendix B of our overview document for details on how we will treat information provided to us as part of this consultation. Our approach to producing Network Rail’s determination and to regulating Network Rail in CP6 For further information, please see chapters 2 and 3 of our overview document. No comments to make Our review of Network Rail’s network licence Further information, see paragraphs 3.59-3.63 of our overview document and our supporting document on our review of the Network Rail’s network licence. This also contains a set of questions that we would welcome your views on. No comments to make Our review of Network Rail’s stakeholder engagement For further information, please see chapter 4 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on stakeholder engagement. No comments to make Our review of Network Rail’s scorecards and requirements For further information, please see chapter 5 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on scorecards and requirements. No comments to make Our assessment of health and safety For further information, please see chapter 6 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on health and safety. No comments to make Our review of Network Rail’s proposed costs and income For further information, please see chapter 7 of our overview document and our related supplementary documents on our review of Network Rail’s proposed costs and its other single till income. No comments to make The financial framework for CP6 and affordability For further information, please see chapter 8 of our overview document and our related supplementary document on the financial framework. No comments to make Charges and contractual incentives in CP6 For further information, please see chapter of 9 of our overview document. We have also published related supplementary documents on: our overall charges and incentives decisions, our proposals on the variable usage charge for CP6 and our proposals on infrastructure cost charges. No comments to make Comments on our supporting annex to the Scotland summary, the draft settlements for the Freight & National Passenger Operator route and the System Operator (SO), or England & Wales route documents For further information, please see the Scotland summary, FNPO draft settlement document, and SO draft settlement document. Our other route review documents are here.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (A) DB Cargo (UK) Limited Whose Registered Office Is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); And
    1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows; (a) DB Cargo (UK) Limited whose Registered Office is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN (“Network Rail”) (“The Respondent”). (c) Contact details for DB Cargo: Graham White, Access Manager South, Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN. (d) Contact details for Network Rail: Duncan Lovatt & Richard Hooper, Network Rail, Wales Route. 2 DETAILS OF REFERENCE 2.1 This matter is referred to a Timetable Panel (“the Panel”) for determination in accordance with Condition D5 of the Network Code 2.2 This Dispute arises from a decision of Network Rail in respect of Network Rail variations made pursuant to Condition D3.5 of the Network Code 3 CONTENTS OF REFERENCE This Sole Reference includes: - (a) The subject matter of the dispute in Section 4; (b) A detailed explanation of the issues in dispute in Section 5; (c) In Section 6, the decision sought from the panel in respect of legal entitlement. 4 SUBJECT MATTER OF DISPUTE 4.1 This dispute arises from the Late Notice Restrictions of Use between Stoke Gifford No 2/ Caldicot and Leckwith Loop North Jn from 0200 on Saturday 19th October to 0420 on Monday 21st October 2019. Possession Reference P2019/2680990 4.2 Copied and annexed to this Reference are: • Appendix A: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (original) [Part] • Appendix B: Re-Issued request 157-W30-WA19 1 • Appendix C: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (subsequent re-issue) [Part] • Appendix D: Decision document for Re-Issued request 157-WA30-WA19 [Part] • Appendix E: Works planned within the restriction of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Response with Appendices
    Defendant’s Response to Sole Reference Ref: TTP1546 1 of 9 1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows:- (a) Freightliner Limited whose Registered Office is at 3rd Floor, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ (“Freightliner”) ("the Claimant"); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN ("Network Rail") ("the Defendant"). 1.2 Other Train and Freight Operating Companies that could be affected by the outcome of this dispute: (a) Greater Anglia (Abellio East Anglia Ltd), MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Ltd, Arriva Rail London Ltd, GB Railfreight Ltd, DB Cargo (UK) Ltd, c2c (Trenitalia c2c Ltd) 2 CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT This Response to the Claimant’s Sole Reference includes:- (a) Confirmation, or qualification, that the subject matter of the dispute is as set out by the Claimant in its Sole Reference, in the form of a summary schedule cross-referenced to the issues raised by the Claimant in the Sole Reference, identifying which the Defendant agrees with and which it disagrees with. (b) A detailed explanation of the Defendant’s arguments in support of its position on those issues where it disagrees with the Claimant’s Sole Reference, including references to documents or contractual provisions not dealt with in the Claimant’s Sole Reference. (c) Any further related issues not raised by the Claimant but which the Defendant considers fall to be determined as part of the dispute; (d) The decisions of principle sought from the Panel in respect of (i) legal entitlement, and (ii) remedies; (e) Appendices and other supporting material.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the Online Report for Downloading
    Sustainability Report 2009 Texts of the online report for downloading 1 Note: These are the texts of the Sustainability Report 2009, which are being made available in this file for archival purposes. The Sustainability Report was designed for an Internet presentation. Thus, for example, related links are shown only on the Internet in order to ensure that the report can be kept up-to-date over the next two years until the next report is due. Where appropriate, graphics are offered on the Internet in better quality than in this document in order to reduce the size of the file downloaded. 2 Table of Contents 1 Our company 6 1.1 Preface .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Corporate Culture................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Confidence..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 Values ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Dialog ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3.1 Stakeholder dialogs 10 1.2.3.2 Memberships 12 1.2.3.3 Environmental dialog 14 1.3 Strategy ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Directory
    ROYAL WARRANT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION MEMBERS’ DIRECTORY 2019–2020 SECRETARY’S FOREWORD 3 WELCOME Dear Reader, The Royal Warrant Holders Association represents one of the most diverse groups of companies in the world in terms of size and sector, from traditional craftspeople to global multinationals operating at the cutting edge of technology. The Members’ Directory lists companies by broad categories that further underline the range of skills, products and services that exist within the membership. Also included is a section dedicated to our principal charitable arm, the Queen Elizabeth Scholarship Trust (QEST), of which HRH The Prince of Wales is Patron. The section profiles the most recent alumni of scholars and apprentices to have benefited from funding, who have each developed their skills and promoted excellence in British craftsmanship. As ever, Royal Warrant holders and QEST are united in our dedication to service, quality and excellence as symbolised by the Royal Warrant of Appointment. We hope you find this printed directory of use when thinking of manufacturers and suppliers of products and services. An online version – which is regularly updated with company information and has enhanced search facilities – can be viewed on our website, www.royalwarrant.org “UNITED IN OUR DEDICATION TO Richard Peck SERVICE, QUALITY CEO & Secretary AND EXCELLENCE” The Royal Warrant Holders Association CONTENTS Directory of members Agriculture & Animal Welfare ...............................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Connection Contract Between DB Cargo and Rail for London For
    ORR Reference : [ ] Subject to Contract and Without Prejudice DATED 22nd September 2017 Between DB Cargo International Limited As Facility Owner - and - Rail for London Limited As Beneficiary _________________________________________________ FACILITY ACCESS CONTRACT Wembley European Freight Operations Centre _________________________________________________ DB Cargo (UK) Ltd Steering & Processes Team McBeath House 310 Goswell Road LONDON EC1V 7LW FA 15002 WEFOC v6-b redacted for websiste.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS CLAUSE NO: PAGE NO: 1. INTERPRETATION 1 1.1 Definitions 1 1.2 Interpretation 7 1.3 Schedules 7 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION 8 2.1 Effective Date 8 2.2 Duration 8 3. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE 8 3.1 General standard 8 3.2 Good faith 8 3.3 Compliance with laws 8 4. PERMISSION TO USE THE Facility 8 4.1 Permission to use 8 4.2 Meaning 8 4.3 Permission under Clauses 4.2(e) and 4.2(f) 9 4.4 Stabling 9 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 10 5.1 General 10 5.2 Safety 10 5.3 Movement of trains onto and off the Facility 10 6. DBCi’s OBLIGATIONS 10 7. RAIL FOR LONDON’s OBLIGATIONS 11 8. GOODS 11 8.1 Risk 11 8.2 Dangerous Goods 12 8.3 Ability to reject Dangerous Goods 12 9. ACCESS CHARGES 12 9.1 Obligation on Rail for London to pay 12 9.2 Price variation 12 9.3 Unpaid sums 13 10. INDEMNITIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 13 10.1 DBCi indemnity 13 10.2 Rail for London indemnity 14 10.3 Mitigation 14 10.4 Notification of claims, limitation on liability and restriction on claims 14 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Railways 02/2017
    No. 02|17 THE DB CARGO CUSTOMER MAGAZINE Europe’s biggest rail freight operator goes digital with its customers THE NEW CODE OF DB CARGO Page 08 MORE SAFETY MORE UTILISATION MORE TRUST SAFETY DAYS ROUND-TRIP DELIVERIES TEN-YEAR PARTNERSHIP: DB REINFORCE SECURITY FOR VOESTALPINE CARGO AND VW IN RUSSIA Page 24 Page 32 Page 34 EDITORIAL A WEIGHTY A FRESH APPROACH! MATTER: There is hardly anything that is affecting our business GRANITE BLOCKS as much as the transformation into a digital society. FOR EUROPE Today, we are facing the tremendous task of further developing our business model in what is a hugely competitive market. This is something we are keen to undertake together with you, our customers. Work- ing in close partnerships is a key principle for us. We have taken an important step forward over the last few months. We have set new milestones and we presented these at the transport logistic trade fair in Munich. These included the development of intelli- gent systems as well as the digitisation, automation and customisation of processes with the aim of mak- ing them more efficient. The course is set. We are taking a fresh approach and IT TAKES EXPERIENCE TO are actively restructuring DB Cargo to ensure that TRANSPORT, LOAD AND Europe’s biggest rail freight company is ready for the STORE A GRANITE BLOCK. future. We are working on new ideas and even better MONIKA ŻABOKLICKA, DB PORT SZCZECIN solutions so that we can jointly capitilise on the TITEK: GETTY IMAGES; EDITORIAL: DEUTSCHE BAHN EDITORIAL: TITEK: GETTY IMAGES; opportunities that the future holds in store.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Day Sale of Railwayana, Advertising, Motoring & Posters
    Two Day Sale of Railwayana, Advertising, Motoring & Posters Friday 12th March 10.30am Lots 1-300 Saturday 13th March 9.30am Lots 301-800 Bid & Watch live Online at no extra cost (see inside for details) www.gwra.co.uk T: 01386 760109 / 07718 211445 Payments can be made by Bank Transfer, Cheque or Debit cards, Please note we do not accept Credit Card payments. IMPORTANT INFORMATION Bidding During The Current Covid 19 SituaƟon You can bid with us at our live AucƟons 3 ways all of which carry or standard 18% Inc Vat Buyers premium. 1/ Submit a Commission Bid by using the Bidding form menu buƩon on our website to submit electronically or post the form in this catalogue. 2/ Sign up and Bid live using GWRA Live Bid facility by using the Bid Live menu buƩon on our website. Full details are on our website but please be aware you will need a Credit / Debit card to Register so the system can run an Address check and validate your details. No money is taken from you at registraƟon or by us if you are successful in winning lots. 3/ Book a Telephone Bid so we can call you on the day. This is only available on lots we esƟmate at over £500 in value and are issued on a first come first served basis up to two per lot. Viewing. We can accommodate viewings on specific lots by appointment only if travel restricƟons permit. There will be NO general viewing allowed. We have invested in a High ResoluƟon zoom capability on all images on our website and this will be a major benefit for remote viewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit List
    EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00530 Petitioner: DB Cargo (UK) Limited DB Cargo International Limited Rail Express Systems Limited Published(formally DB to SchenkerCollaboration (UK Area: Limited) Monday 21-Nov-2016 Page 1 of 182 No Exhibit Name Page 1 A703 Summary of Arguments.pdf (A703) 2 - 3 2 A704 Presentation.pdf (A704) 4 - 15 3 A705 HoC Select Committee transcript 28012016.pdf (A705) 16 - 35 4 A706 HoC Select Committee 2nd Report Feb 2016.pdf (A706) 36 - 148 5 A707 DfT Response to Select Committee Report Mar 2016.pdf (A707) 149 - 182 HOL/00530/0001 HOUSE OF LORDS SELECT COMMITTEE: HS2 (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Petition 530: DB Cargo SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS 1. DB Cargo has a long lease on the Willesden Euroterminal site that runs until 2119. This is close to a freehold interest. The Euroterminal operates as a multi-purpose rail freight terminal. It is a unique facility which is of very considerable importance to rail freight nationally. It is open access, so all freight operators are able to use the terminal on the same terms as DB Cargo uses it. 2. There are many public benefits arising from the use of the Euroterminal for freight. The Euroterminal supports the construction industry in London. It is used to deliver aggregates and materials to London and to remove waste and spoil. This is vital to support construction in London, especially for much needed new housing (including at Old Oak and Park Royal). It could also be important to delivering projects such as the Thames Tunnel and Crossrail 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Herunterladen
    Integrierter 2020 Bericht Deutsche Bahn Integrierter Bericht 2020 Ein starkes Team für eine starke Schiene Deutsche Bahn Zum interaktiven Auf einen Blick Kennzahlenvergleich √ Veränderung Ausgewählte Kennzahlen 2020 2019 absolut % FINANZKENNZAHLEN IN MIO. € Umsatz bereinigt 39.902 44.431 – 4.529 – 10,2 Umsatz vergleichbar 40.197 44.330 – 4.133 – 9,3 Ergebnis vor Ertragsteuern – 5.484 681 – 6.165 – Jahresergebnis – 5.707 680 – 6.387 – EBITDA bereinigt 1.002 5.436 – 4.434 – 81,6 EBIT bereinigt – 2.903 1.837 – 4.740 – Eigenkapital per 31.12. 7.270 14.927 – 7.657 – 51,3 Netto-Finanzschulden per 31.12. 29.345 24.175 + 5.170 + 21,4 Bilanzsumme per 31.12. 65.435 65.828 – 393 – 0,6 Capital Employed per 31.12. 41.764 42.999 – 1.235 – 2,9 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) in % – 7,0 4,3 – – Tilgungsdeckung in % 0,8 15,3 – – Brutto-Investitionen 14.402 13.093 + 1.309 + 10,0 Netto-Investitionen 5.886 5.646 + 240 + 4,3 Mittelfluss aus gewöhnlicher Geschäftstätigkeit 1.420 3.278 – 1.858 – 56,7 LEISTUNGSKENNZAHLEN Reisende in Mio. 2.866 4.874 –2.008 –41,2 SCHIENENPERSONENVERKEHR Pünktlichkeit DB-Schienenpersonenverkehr in Deutschland in % 95,2 93,9 – – Pünktlichkeit DB Fernverkehr in% 81,8 75,9 – – Reisende in Mio. 1.499 2.603 –1.104 –42,4 davon in Deutschland 1.297 2.123 –826 –38,9 davon DB Fernverkehr 81,3 150,7 –69,4 –46,1 Verkehrsleistung in Mio. Pkm 51.933 98.402 –46.469 –47,2 Betriebsleistung in Mio. Trkm 677,8 767,3 –89,5 –11,7 SCHIENENGÜTERVERKEHR Beförderte Güter in Mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Capacity Allocation: a Survey of Market Organizations, Allocation Processes and Track Access Charges
    Railway Capacity Allocation: A Survey of Market Organizations, Allocation Processes and Track Access Charges VTI Working Paper 2019:1 Abderrahman Ait Ali1,2 and Jonas Eliasson2 1 Transport Economics, VTI, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute 2 Communications and Transport Systems, Linköping University Abstract In the last few decades, many railway markets (especially in Europe) have been restructured to allow competition between different operators. This survey studies how competition has been introduced and regulated in a number of different countries around the world. In particular, we focus on a central part of market regulation specific to railway markets, namely the capacity allocation process. Conflicting capacity requests from different train operators need to be regulated and resolved, and the efficiency and transparency of this process is crucial. Related to this issue is how access charges are constructed and applied. Several European countries have vertically separated their railway markets, separating infrastructure management from train services provisions, thus allowing several train operators to compete with different passengers and freight services. However, few countries have so far managed to create efficient and transparent processes for allocating capacity between competing train operators, and incumbent operators still have larger market-share in many markets. Keywords Railway markets; vertical separation; competition; capacity allocation; access charges. JEL Codes R40 Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute www.vti.se Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute www.vti.se Railway Capacity Allocation: A Survey of Market Organizations, Allocation Processes and Track Access Charges Abderrahman Ait Ali1,2,* and Jonas Eliasson2 1Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Malvinas väg 6, SE-114 28 Stockholm, Sweden 2Linköping University, Luntgatan 2, SE-602 47 Norrköping, Sweden (*) Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Bahn Integrierter Zwischenbericht Januar – Juni 2021
    Deutsche Bahn Integrierter Zwischenbericht Januar – Juni 2021 Deutschland braucht eine starke Schiene Strategie Starke Schiene Wir haben ein elementares Anliegen: mehr Verkehr auf die Schiene bringen. Unsere Strategie Starke Schiene schafft hierfür die Voraussetzungen. Die Ausbausteine der Starken Schiene AUSBAUSTEINE ZUR ORGANISATION AUSBAUSTEIN DER VERKEHRSVERLAGERUNG DER GRÜNEN TRANSFORMATION Robuster. Schlagkräftiger. Moderner. Ausbau Starke Deutschland Infra- Regelorga- im Takt struktur nisation Ausrichtung Digitale Verant- auf Schiene wortung im Wachstums - Deutschland Verbund segmente Kapazitäts- Umwelt und Starke Digitale manage- 100% Funktionen Plattformen ment Netz Grünstrom Ausbau Neue Stabile Flotte und Mobilitäts- Prozesse Werke formen 15 Aus - 100.000 bausteine Smarte Mitarbei- der Mitar- Services tende beitenden Klimaneutral bis 2040 Wir wollen bereits bis 2040 klimaneu- tral sein. Mit dieser Entscheidung haben wir das bisherige Ziel um zehn Jahre vor gezogen. Damit liegt unser angestrebtes Zieljahr deutlich vor dem durch die Bundesregie- rung beschlossenen Zieljahr 2045 für die Klimaneutralität Deutschlands. Auf einen Blick 1. Halbjahr Veränderung 1. Halbjahr Ausgewählte Kennzahlen 2021 2020 absolut % 2019 FINANZKENNZAHLEN IN MIO. € Umsatz bereinigt 21.786 19.423 +2.363 +12,2 22.013 Umsatz vergleichbar 21.932 19.417 +2.515 +13,0 21.972 Ergebnis vor Ertragsteuern –1.306 –3.669 +2.363 –64,4 277 Ergebnis nach Ertragsteuern –1.428 –3.749 +2.321 –61,9 205 EBITDA bereinigt 883 157 +726 – 2.534 EBIT bereinigt –975 –1.780 +805 –45,2 757 Eigenkapital per 30.06./31.12. 7.274 7.270 +4 +0,1 14.927 Netto-Finanzschulden per 30.06./31.12. 32.002 29.345 +2.657 +9,1 24.175 Bilanzsumme per 30.06./31.12.
    [Show full text]