Phylogenetic Relationships in Some Species of the Genus Macrobrachium Based on Nucleotide Sequences of the Mitochondrial Gene Cytochrome Oxidase I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Phylogeny of Macrobrachium PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN SOME SPECIES OF THE GENUS MACROBRACHIUM BASED ON NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES OF THE MITOCHONDRIAL GENE CYTOCHROME OXIDASE I Guido Pereira, Hilda De Stefano, Joseph Staton and Brian Farrell GP, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Instituto de Zoologia Tropical, Apartado 47058, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela HDS, Universidad Nacional Experimental Simon Rodriguez, Instituto de Estudios Cientifwos y Tecnologicos, Centro de Estudios Biomedicos y Veterinarios, Apartado 47925 Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela JS, BF, Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ABSTRACT subfamily Palaemoninae in which the most obvious conclusion was that the subfamily shows different de A phylogeny for four species of the freshwater grees of paraphyly at the subfamily and generic levels jg prawn genus Macrobrachium (M. carcinus, M. olfersii,M. (Fig. 1). However, further corroboration is necessary ^acanthurus andM rosenbergii) based on the partial nucle- in order to improve this phylogenetic hypothesis to | otide sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase wards a more stable model. Molecular Systematics may W'l subunit I gene is presented. The results are consistent with provide further evidence independent of previous mor ©•J previous studies based on morphological data. phological analysis that would be of great help in order to improve our understanding of phylogenetic relation I. INTRODUCTION ships among the group. The objective of the present study is to determine The genus Macrobrachium comprises a group the partial nucleotide sequence of the mitochondrial cyto I; of approximately 250 species distributed in the tropics chrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) of representative {&,worldwide, they are very common in freshwater rivers species of Macrobrachium to begin a genetic database of jvand one species, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man) palaemonid shrimps and to establish phylogenetic hypoth -,is cultivated worldwide. The alpha taxonomy of the ge- esis to compare it with previously published phytogenies jjnus as well as that of the whole subfamily Palaemoninae based on morphological characters. ihas remained without major changes after the mono graphic studies of Holthuis (1950, 1951, 1952), who II. MATERIALS AND METHODS fpcombined several subgenera within the single genus ^Macrobrachium. Regarding the phylogenetic relation- Four species of freshwater shrimps in the family |« ships within the genus, some authors have recognized Palaemonidae (Macrobrachium carcinus (L), M. olfersii |,Jseveral species groups, but no formal action has been (Wiegmann), M. acanthurus (Wiegmann) and M. .;taken to reorganize the genus so that it reflects phylo- rosenbergii (De Man)) and one species in the family Atyidae %genetic relationships. Pereira (1997), based on previ (Potimirim potimirim (Miiller)) were selected. Addition ous work (Pereira 1989) showed a cladogram of the ally, five taxa whose sequences were obtained from E. Escobar-Briones & F. Alvarez Eds. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers MODERN APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF CRUSTACEA PP. 319-322 G. Pereira, H. De Stefano, J. Staton & B. Farrell GenBank were included (Utopenaeusvannamei (Boone), with the following thermal cycle protocol (40 cycles): Table 2. Sequence and alignm Artemia franciscana (L),Daphniapulex (Leidig),Anoph 30 sec at 94 °C (DNA denaturing); 30 sec at 50 °C eles gambie (Giles) and Drosophilayakuba). (primer annealing); 60 sec at 72 °C (primer exten Potimirim potimirim The laboratory methods used in this study sion) . The product of this reaction was purified af followed Hillis et al. (1996). DNAwas extracted from ter being run on an agarose gel (QIAquick columns, ??????????????????????????' ATGATCAAATTTACMCGTAWT muscle tissue and visualized in agarose gels. mtDNA Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and visualized in agar GACTGGTCCCACTAATGCTAG( fragments were amplified >by the polymerase chain ose gel. Sequencing was carried out using DNA au TTACTATCCAGAGGAATAGTAG reaction (PCR) using tested primers for COI (Table 1) tomatic sequencing machine (ABI PRISM 370A). TCTGTCGACCTTGGTATrmT The sequences were edited, translated to amino ac AGAACAGGAATACTAATAGACCC ids of the COI, aligned and translated back to DNA Table 1. Sequence information for oligonucleotide primers GGAGCTATTACTATACTTTCAAI sequences. DNA sequences for related species were (Simon et al. 1994, Folmer et al. 1994). obtained fron GenBank. Phylograms were generated Macrobrachium acanthurus A2963 5' AGGTAGTTCTTCATTATAIGMTGTTC 3' using a distance method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and A2771 5' GGATAA/GTCAGAA/GTAACGTCGA/TGG/TGGTATA/C 3' maximum parsimony (MP). Several outgroups CTCATCTTGATCTTCGGAKCTI were used simultaneously in order to use the overall GAGAAATTATCAGATCTACAACC S1718 5' GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCC 3' outgroup parsimony (Madison et al. 1984, Pereira ACTGACTACTGCCCCTAATACT S1991 5'GTAATTAATATACGACCTAAAGG 3' 1997). Phylogenetic trees were generated with the TCCTTTTATCGAGAGGTATGG1 LCO1490 5' GGTCMCAAATCATAAAGATATTG 3' computer program PAUP (Swofford 1998), us ATCAGTAGACCTCGGGATTTTC ing the Branch and Bound algorithm excluding 3rd GTCACCGGGCATAACCATGGAi HC02198 5' TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA 3' position. CCGGAGCAATTACCATG1TACT Figure I. Partialview of'the morphological based cladogram after Pereira (1997). (prefers to species ofMacrobrachium used in the analysis MacrobrctcMum olfersii CTATCTTGGATCTTCGGAGCT M. carcinus * TGGGAATGACCAAATCTACAAC M. vollenhoveni M. lar TAATTGACTAGTCCCTCTAATAC M. heterochirus CTTCTTCTATCCAGAGGAATGC M. horstii CCTCAGTTGACCTCGGTATCT M. placidulum M. felicinum * GATCTCCTGGAATAACTATAGAi M. olfersii * TGGAGCTATCACTATGGTIATA/ r-T^ M. hirtimanus M. latimanus C. caementerius Macrobrachium carcinus M. ohione M. brasiliense ??????????????????????????' M. iheringi TGATCAAATCTACAACGTTATT' M. nattereri C. brasiliensis GCTAGTCCCCCTTATACTAGG/ M. aracamuni ACTATCTAGAGGAATAGTGGA* M. cortezi CAGTAGACCTTGGAATCTTTT( M. ferrierai M. potiuna TCACCAGGAATAACCATAGACC By. luscus GGAGCCATCACTATATTATTGA M. quelchi M. nepalense Macrobrachium rosenbergii M. dux M. rosenbergii * M. panamense CCCATCTTGGACYTCGGAGCC M. amazonicum TCGGAAATGACCAAATCTACAAi M. acanthurus * MTTGACTAGTACCCCTAATATI ^ M. macrobrachion . M. weberi TCTTCTCTCCAGAGGAATAGIA M. equidens TCGGTAGATCTAGGTATTTTn M. lujae CCCCAGGAATAACTATAGATCG M. raridens M« foai AGCCATTACCATACTCTEAACTC 320 T Phytogeny ofMacrobrachium Table 2. Sequence and alignment of 651 nucleotide for the Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 1 for five species used in the analysis. Jcol (40 cycles). 30 sec at 50 °C (primer exten Potimirim potimirim .vas purified af > — , 7??''???????????????????????GAATAGTAGGMCTGCCCTAAGTCTCTTMTTCGAGCTGMCTAGGTCAGCCAGGCAGACTMTTGGGA .quick columns, \\rGATCAMTTTACMCGTAWTTGTTACAbcCCATO^ ualized in agar lACTGGTCCCACTMTGCTAGGAGCCCCAGATATGGCTTTTCCCCGGATAMCM^ using DNAau PRISM 370A) rTACTATCCAGAGGAATAGTAGAAAGGGGCGTGGGCACAGGATGAACTGTGTACCCACCCCTTGCTAGAGGAATTGCTCATGCCGGGGCT ed to amino ac rcTGTCGACCTTGGTATTTTTTCACTCCACTTAGCAGGAGTGTC^ :d back to DNA \GMCAGGMTACTMTAGACCGGATACCCCTCTTTGTGTGATCTGTCTTTATTACTGCCATTTTATTACTTCTCTCTCTCCCGGTAC^^ ed species were C,GAGCTATTACTATACTTTCAACCGACCGTA\TTTAMTACCTCATTCTTTGACCCCGCAGGAAGTGGTGACC???????????????????? were generated yacrobrackium acanthurus INei 1987)and jral outgroups tTCATCTTGATCTTCGGAKCTCGAGCTGGCATATTMGCACATCTCTTTMGACTTMTCCGGGCTGAACTAGGGCAGCCAGGCAGACTAAT 3 use the overall CAGAMTWCAGATCT\CMCGTCATTGTCACTGCCCACGCATTCGT^^^ I. 1984,Pereira ACTG^CX^CTGCCCCTAATACTAGGTGCCCCCGACATGGCCTTCCCCCGMTAMCMCATGAGATTCTGACTTTTACCCCCATCACTCACAC erated with the ICC'rTTTATCGAGAGGTATGGTAGAAAGCGGGGTAGGCACGGGGTGAACTGTATACCCCCCACTAGCAGCCGGGACTGCACATGCAGGAGC rd 1998), us- VCAGT^GACCTCGGGATTTTCTCATTACACCTCGCAGGTGT^ m excluding 3rt CTCACCGGGCATMCCATGGACCGACTCCCCCTATTTGTATGGGCGGTATTCCTGACAGCCATTCTTCTTnTATTTCCCTTCCTGTATTAG CCGGAGGAATTACCATGTTACTMCAGACCGAMCCTAMmCTTCCTTCTTTGACCCTGTTGGGGGAGGAGACCCA?????????????????? i used in the analysis , Vacmbrachiwn olfersii LTATCTTGGATCTrCGGAGCTrGAGCAGGmmGTCGGCACATCCCTMGACTCTTMTTCGAGCTGAATTAGGTCAACCCGGGAGACWGAT -cinus * TGGGMTGACCAMTCTACMCGTCATWGTCACCGSWCACGCTTTCGXAATMTTTTCTTCATGGTMTGCCTATCATMTTGGAGGATTCGG lenhoveni IWTTGACTAGTCCCTCTMTACTAGGAGCACCTGAmTGGCCTTCCCCCGAATGMTMCATMGATTCTGACTCCTGCCCCCCTCTCTAAAT terochirus tTTCTrCTATCCAGAGGAATGGTAGAAAGAGGTGTAGGAACCGGGTGAACCGTGTATCCCCCCCTAGCTGCAGGAACCGCCCACGCCGGAG rstii CCTCAGTTGACCTCGGTATCTTITCCCTCCACTTAGCCG icidulum icinum * (.ATCTCCTGGMTMCTATAGACCGACTACCCCTATTCGTTTGAGCGGTATTATTMCCGCCATTATTGTCGTTCTTTCC^^ ersii * IGGAGCTATCACXWGGTTATMCTGACCGAMCCTAAAX^CATCCTTCTTTGACCCTGCCGGGGGTGGAGACCCMTTTTAT??????????? timanus imanus menterius Macrobrachium cardrms ione isiliense ,'r'?????????????????????????????????GCACATCTCTGANACTCTTAATTCGTGCTGAGTTAGGACAACCGGGCAGACTAATCGGAAA :ringi 1GATCAMTCTACMCGTTATTGTCACAGCTCACGCGTTCGTMTAATTTTCTTCATGGTAATGCCMTTATMTTGGAGGCTTT ttereri siliensis (CTAGTCCCCCTmTACTAGGAGCCCCAGACATGGCCTTCCCGCGMTAAATMTATMGATTCTGGCTCTTACCTCCCTCTCTAACTCTCCT icamuni \CTATCTAGAGGAATAGTGGAAAGAGGGGTGGGGACAGGATGAACTGTGTACCCCCCTCTAGCAGCAGGAACTGCTCACGCGGGACCTG rtezi IAGTAGACCTTGGMTCTTTTCCCTTCACCTTGCCGGTGTCTCATCTATCCTGGGTGCCGTCMTTTCATCACCACTGTAATTAACATGCGA rierai tiuna I'CACCAGGMTAACCATAGACCGGCTACCCCTATTAGTGTGAGTC 3CUS (IGACICCATCACTATATTATTGACAGACCGAMCTCAMX\CTGANNNTTTYGACCCAGCAGGNGGAGGCGACCTCAAT??????????????? elchi palense Macrobrachium rosenbergii x senbergii * namense rCCATCTTGGACYTCGGAGCGTGAGCAGGCATGGTAGGTACGTCACTMGACTCTTMTTCGAGCAGAATTAGGGCAGCCGGGCAGACTGA lazonicum I'CGGAMTGACCAMTCTACMCGTWTGTCACTGCCCACGC^^