The Disinformation Dilemma: How to Respond and Regulate Without Undermining Democracy?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Disinformation Dilemma: How to Respond and Regulate Without Undermining Democracy? © AdobeStock/terovesalainen European Parliament Online Seminar The disinformation dilemma: How to respond and regulate without undermining democracy? 17 March 2021, 14:30 CET / 09:30 EST #Disinformation Directorate-General for Communication 14:30 Welcome and practicalities 14:35 Opening Jaume DUCH GUILLOT, European Parliament Spokesperson 14:40 Keynote speech Christopher KREBS, former Director of the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Moderator: Delphine COLARD, European Parliament Head of Spokesperson’s Unit and Deputy Spokesperson 15:00 Panel 1 - The disinformation challenge: foreign and domestic actors Sandra KALNIETE (EPP, Latvia), Member of the European Parliament. Rapporteur on Foreign interference in all the democratic processes in the EU, including disinformation in (INGE) Sophie IN ‘T VELD (Renew, The Netherlands), Member of the European Parliament. Member of LIBE Committe and Chair of Democracy, Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights Monitoring Group Ambassador Baiba BRAŽE, Assistant Secretary General of the Public Diplomacy Division, NATO HQ Geysha GONZÁLEZ, Senior Director for Programs and Strategy at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) Moderator: Raffaella DE MARTE, European Parliament Head of Media Services Unit 15:50 Panel 2 -Fighting disinformation and modernising our online regulation Christel SCHALDEMOSE (S&D, Denmark), Member of the European Parliament. Newly elected Rapporteur for Digital Services Act (Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, IMCO) Magdalena ADAMOWICZ (EPP, Poland), Member of the European Parliament. Rapporteur on Strengthening Media Freedom: the Protection of Journalists in Europe, Hate Speech, Disinformation and the Role of Platforms (Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE) Susan NESS, Distinguished Fellow, German Marshall Fund US Tyson BARKER, Head, Technology and Global Affairs at the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP) (TBC) 16:35 Closing remarks Joe DUNNE, Director of European Parliament Liaison Office in Washington If you are a journalist interested on participating in this press webinar, please, inscribe in order to receive the WEBEX LINK to: European Parliament Media Seminars [email protected] Background Defending democracies in the post-truth era: fighting disinformation and protecting our info-sphere Across the world, conspiracy theories and anti-democratic narratives have been spreading at an alarming rate, and our vulnerabilities to false information - disproportionately amplified by largely self-regulated social media plat- forms - have been accelerated by the pandemic. We are targeted by authoritarian actors that seek to undermine trust in our democracies and blur the lines between fact and fiction. On both sides of the Atlantic we are increasingly aware that the domestic sources of disinformation also pose a great threat. Our legislation for the digital sphere, key parts of which date back before the emergence of social media, is under review and new proposals are on the table in the EU. A similar debate is taking place in the USA. How can we make sure that we become more resilient to dis- information and conspiracy theories? How can we protect our infosphere - the space for public democratic debate - against foreign and domestic anti-democratic actors? And what are the avenues for transatlantic cooperation? The disinformation that supports the anti-democratic narratives also gives some reasons to look at: • The power of domestic disinformation is often underestimated. Foreign interference was a hot topic after the 2016 US election and it remains a threat. However, analysis shows it was not a significant factor in either the 2019 European elections or the 2020 US elections. Disinformation from within is a more complex regulation challenge, since democracy must be defended without compromising fundamental values, such as freedom of speech. • Distrust of institutions and false narratives are gaining ground. Even extreme conspiracy theories like QA- non have gained a following in Europe. Multiple conspiracy theories - playing into fears about perceived elites and about COVID-19 - can have a powerful compound effect to erode trust in the establishment and the lines between fact and fiction, especially at a time of economic and societal fragility. Democratic narratives in our communications are more important than ever. • Self-regulation by social media platforms is inadequate. Current relevant digital legislation in both the US and EU dates back over 20 years, before the arrival of social media. The Commission launched a voluntary code of conduct on disinformation in 2018 and published new proposals last month, including a European Democracy Action Plan, the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act. They aim to increase transparency and account- ability of platforms. EP committees will get to work on these proposals in the coming weeks. • Disruption of rule of law at home undermines our democracy building efforts around the world. Autocratic leaders have been quick to try to relate the Capitol Hill riots as evidence of a failure of democracy, or of double standards by western leaders when the unrest is in their back yard..
Recommended publications
  • Accession Treaty
    23.9.2003EN Official Journal of the European Union 17 TREATY BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF BELGIUM, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, IRELAND, THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA, THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND, THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND (MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION) AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA, THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC, CONCERNING THE ACCESSION OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY, THE REPUBLIC OF MALTA, THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND, THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC TO THE EUROPEAN UNION HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF DENMARK, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC, HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN, THE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, THE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections Why Vote? English
    Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Latvia Results of the 25 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 New Unity EPP 124 193 26.24 % 2 ↓ Social Democratic Party S&D 82 604 17.45 % 2 ↑ "Harmony" National Alliance "All for Latvia!" - ECR 77 591 16.40 % 2 ↑ For Fatherland and Freedom Development/For! 58 763 12.42 % 1 New Latvian Russian Union Greens/EFA 29 546 6.24 % 1 = Showing 1 to 5 of 5 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Inese Vaidere New Alliance EPP Sandra Kalniete New Alliance EPP Nils Ouchakov Social-democrat Party S&D Andris Ameriks Social-democrat Party S&D Tatjana Ždanoka Russian Union of Latvia Greens/EFA Roberts Zile National Alliance ECR Dace Melbärde National Alliance ECR Ivars Ijabs Development Renew Europe Lists for the elections on 25 May 2019 European Leading Name of party Translation Website Programme affiliation candidate Jauna Vienotība New Unity EPP Valdis vienotiba.lv Programme Dombrovskis Sociāldemokrātiskā Partija Social Democratic Party S&D Nils Ušakovs saskana.eu Programme "Saskaņa" (SDPS) "Harmony" Progresīvie The Progressives S&D Gunta Anča progresivie.lv Programme Nacionālā apvienība "Visu National Alliance "All for ECR Roberts Zile nacionalaapvieniba.lv Programme Latvijai!"-"Tēvzemei un Latvia!" - For Fatherland Brīvībai/LNNK" and Freedom Zaļo un Zemnieku Union of Greens and ALDE Dana zzs.lv Programme savienība (ZZS) Farmers
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria Da Graça
    12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Deirdre Clune, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Hildegard Bentele, Vladimír Bilčík, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Geoffroy Didier, Jarosław Duda, José Manuel Fernandes, Loucas Fourlas, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Esteban González Pons, Christophe Hansen, György Hölvényi, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Arba Kokalari, Ewa Kopacz, Andrius Kubilius, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Leopoldo López Gil, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Aušra Maldeikienė, Lukas Mandl, Liudas Mažylis, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Nadine Morano, Marlene Mortler, Janina Ochojska, Markus Pieper, Jessica Polfjärd, Christian Sagartz, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Christine Schneider, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Eugen Tomac, Sabine Verheyen, Maria Walsh, Jörgen Warborn, Angelika Winzig, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Gabriel Mato, Henna Virkkunen, Franc Bogovič, Andrzej Halicki, Michael Gahler, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Tom Berendsen, Peter Pollák, Siegfried Mureşan, Peter Liese, David Lega, Pernille Weiss, Tomasz Frankowski, Lena Düpont, Magdalena Adamowicz, Dennis Radtke, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Radosław Sikorski, Traian Băsescu, Stefan Berger, Michaela Šojdrová Report A9-0115/2021 Mónica Silvana González Impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (2020/2042(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 - introductory part Motion for a resolution Amendment
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Foreign Affairs Results of Roll-Call Votes of 1 September
    Committee on Foreign Affairs Results of roll-call votes of 1 September 2021 Table of Contents 1. EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation (2021/2041(INI)) Rapporteur: Charlie Weimers (ECR) ....page 2 2. The EU Gender Action Plan III (2021/2041(INI)) Rapporteur: Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE) ...page 3 1 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE Report on the EU-Taiwan political relations and cooperation (2021/2041(INI)) 60 + ECR Anna Fotyga, Assita Kanko, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Hermann Tertsch, Witold Jan Waszczykowski, Charlie Weimers ID Anna Bonfrisco, Susanna Ceccardi NI Fabio Massimo Castaldo, Márton Gyöngyösi PPE Alexander Alexandrov Yordanov, Traian Băsescu, Vladimír Bilčík, Michael Gahler, Sunčana Glavak, Andrzej Halicki, Sandra Kalniete, Andrius Kubilius, David Lega, Miriam Lexmann, Antonio López-Istúriz White, David McAllister, Lukas Mandl, Vangelis Meimarakis, Francisco José Millán Mon, Gheorghe-Vlad Nistor, Radosław Sikorski, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Željana Zovko Renew Petras Auštrevičius, Katalin Cseh, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Javier Nart, Urmas Paet, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos S&D Maria Arena, Robert Biedroń, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Andrea Cozzolino, Tanja Fajon, Raphaël Glucksmann, Claudiu Manda, Sven Mikser, Demetris Papadakis, Tonino Picula, Thijs Reuten, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Isabel Santos, Andreas Schieder, Sergei Stanishev Verts/ALE Alviina Alametsä, Reinhard Bütikofer, Hannah Neumann, Jordi Solé, Tineke Strik, Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel, Salima Yenbou 4 - NI Kostas Papadakis
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidency the EPP Group Structure
    Follow us The EPP Group Structure The Presidency April 2018 Founded as the Christian - Democratic Group on 23 June 1953 as a faction THE BUREAU in the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community, The Bureau, the Group's political organ, shall consist of: the Group changed its name to the 'Group of the European People's Party' (Christian-Democratic Group) in July 1979, just after the first direct > the Members of the Presidency elections to the European Parliament, and to the 'Group of the European > the Heads of National Delegations and an additional Member People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats' in July for every ten Members 1999. After the European elections in 2009, the Group went back to its roots > the Members of the Presidency of the Parliament belonging to the Group > the Chairmen of Standing Committees belonging to the Group as the 'Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)'. > the Coordinator within each of the Standing Committees It has always played a leading role in the construction of Europe. > the Chairman and the Secretary General of the European The Chairman of the EPP Group is Manfred Weber MEP. He chairs People's Party, if they are Members of the European Parliament its governing bodies and speaks for the Group in keynote debates (If the Chairman and the Secretary General of the European People's during the Plenary Sessions at the European Parliament. He is Party are not Members of the European Parliament, they are permanently supported by Coordinators on each of the Parliament's committees invited ad personam to the meetings of the Bureau.) and by Heads of the National Delegations represented in the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Care Farming State-Of-The-Art National Report
    2017-1-PL01-KA202-038380 CARE-T-FARMS Care Activities Raising Employment and Training on Farm Adaptation to Responsible and Mental-health Services Care Farming State-of-the-Art European Report https://europa.eu/european-union/about-e 1 Developed by the European Landowners’ Organization in Brussels, Belgium (Marie-Alice Budniok, Maeve Howe, and Servane Morand) February 2018 page 1 of 16 Introduction 1. Theoretical background of care farming at European level. Care farming, also known as “green care”, “social farming”, "farming for health", and "green therapies", has taken on various forms and is organised in different ways in different European countries. There is great variety in the approaches to social farming across Europe, as well as in how it is connected to other sectors and the funding mechanisms that are used. Care farming has taken on many different forms across Europe, broadly based around three different discourses; multifunctional agriculture, public health, and social inclusion. One could say that care farming is most established in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy. Most research in the Netherlands focuses on care farming as part of the agricultural sector and as a new source of farm income. Great importance is also placed on interaction between participants and the farmers and their families. Care farming took off commercially in the Netherlands in the 1990s. It tends to operate on a service-based model. Engaging in care farming activities are seen as a type of social or health service and these activities are paid for directly or indirectly through health insurance. Similarities with the Dutch experience of social farming can be observed in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovenia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidency the EPP Group Structure
    Follow us The EPP Group Structure The Presidency April 2016 Founded as the Christian - Democratic Group on 23 June 1953 as a faction THE BUREAU in the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community, The Bureau, the Group's political organ, consists of: the Group changed its name to the 'Group of the European People's Party' (Christian-Democratic Group) in July 1979, just after the first direct > The Members of the Presidency elections to the European Parliament, and to the 'Group of the European > The Heads of National Delegations People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats' in July > The Vice-Presidents and Quaestors of the European Parliament 1999. After the European elections in 2009, the Group went back to its roots belonging to the Group as the 'Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)'. > The Chairmen of Parliamentary Committees belonging to the Group It has always played a leading role in the construction of Europe. > The Coordinator within each of the Standing Committees > The Chairman and the Secretary-General of the European The Chairman of the EPP Group is Manfred Weber MEP. He chairs People's Party, if they are Members of the European Parliament its governing bodies and speaks for the Group in keynote debates > One co-opted Member for every 10 Members of a national delegation during the Plenary Sessions at the European Parliament. He is supported by Coordinators on each of the Parliament's Committees THE FOUR WORKING GROUPS and by Heads of the National Delegations represented in the Group. The operational needs of the Group are serviced by a Group The EPP Group's political strategy is formulated in the framework of Manfred Weber Esther de Lange Secretariat, providing policy and organisational support.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Report European Parliament Implementation Security
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0052/2019 11.12.2019 REPORT on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report (2019/2135(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs Rapporteur: Arnaud Danjean RR\1194968EN.docx PE641.445v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI TABLE OF CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 MINORITY POSITION ........................................................................................................... 26 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS .............................. 27 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 33 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 34 PE641.445v03-00 2/34 RR\1194968EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report (2019/2135(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), – having regard to the European Council conclusions of 20 December 2013, 26 June 2015, 15 December 2016, 22 June 2017, 28 June 2018, 14 December 2018 and 20 June 2019, – having regard to the Council conclusions on the common security and defence policy of 25 November 2013, 18 November 2014, 18 May 2015, 27 June 2016, 14 November 2016, 18 May 2017, 17 July 2017, 25 June 2018 and 17 June 2019, – having regard to the document entitled
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER UN Security Council
    To: Members of the UN Security Council Brussels, 19 February 2020 Your Excellencies, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin has recently called on China, France, the United Kingdom and the United States to convene a meeting of the Permanent Members of the UN Security Council to discuss global threats and fight against chauvinism, racism, hate and anti-Semitism. It is still not very clear if such a meeting is going to happen. The issues, which are proposed to be discussed, are important ones, but the initiative of President Putin has very clear internal contradiction, which should be very carefully considered before approving it. The initiative to discuss these threats and ways to maintain global peace and security comes from the leader of a government, which effectively denies international rules and norms, pursues aggressive military expansionist policy, uses active measures to saw discord in sovereign countries, uses distorted historical narratives as a tool of hybrid warfare against democracies and denies horrific crimes committed by the Soviet totalitarian regime - occupations and genocide, responsibility for millions of violent deaths in extrajudicial executions, mass- deportations, killing populations in labor camps and artificially created famines. The European Parliament Resolution on the Importance of the European Remembrance for the Future of Europe, adopted on 19 September 2019, condemns in the strongest terms the acts of aggression, crimes against humanity and mass human rights violations perpetrated by the Nazi, communist and other totalitarian regimes, and calls for remembrance that rejects the crimes of fascist, Stalinist, and other totalitarian and authoritarian regimes of the past as a way of fostering resilience against modern threats to democracy.
    [Show full text]