DOCSLIB.ORG

Signalteknisk ERTMS-Ordlista

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Signalteknisk ERTMS-Ordlista Datum Diarienummer Annan beteckning Antal bilagor 2010-06-11 ESPRI 168 - - Signalteknisk ERTMS-ordlista Ordlistan innehåller nya signaltekniska termer som tillkommit i och med att ERTMS införs i Sverige. Listan är främst riktad till dem som jobbar med signalteknik. Även E-TRI-projektet har gett ut en ordlista. Den är riktad mot andra intressenter, t.ex. förare och tågklarerare. De båda ordlistorna är delvis överlappande men överensstämmer med varandra utom med några få undantag. I dessa fall har det har inte ansetts möjligt att använda samma termer eftersom begreppen är väl inarbetade i båda användarkategorierna. De är dock markerade i ordlistan för att uppmärksamma detta och begränsa och undvika förvirring. Synpunkter, förslag på ändringar och kompletteringar skickas till: Kjell Johansson, Ttpemn 0243-44 63 75 [email protected] Rapport ESPRI 168, version 2.0 2010-06-11 Ändringsinformation 2008-02-07 Version 1.0 2008-02-16 Version 1.0.1 - Rättning av förväxlade översättningar för med- och motväxel. - ”Del av väg” ändrad till ”Del av rörelseväg”. 2008-06-13 Version 1.1 - Dokumentet kompletterat med försättsblad, ändringsinformation och läsanvisning. - Hänvisningar inom dokumentet rättade. - Definitionen på ”permanent hastighetsnedsättning” rättad. 2010-06-11 Version 2.0 - Dokumentet är anpassat till begreppen i JvSFS - Nya benämningar på driftlägen - Termer med anknytning till nyckelhanteringen införda - Ett index över engelska begrepp och förkortningar infört - Nya termer - Advanced Encryption Standard - Begränsad övervakning - Data Encryption Standard - Data Encrytption Algoritm - ERTMS Interoperability Contract - Euroradio - Key Derivation Function - Key Management - Key Management Centre - K-KMC - KMAC - KTRANS - Message Authentication Code - Passiv skiftning - Triple Data Encryption Algorithm - Strukna termer - STM-läge Europeisk - Ändrade termer - Avkortat körbesked → Avkortat tekniskt körbesked - Backningsläge → Nödbackning - Begäran om körbesked → Begäran om tekniskt körtillstånd - Beredskapsläge → Beredskap - Blandade nivåer → Dubbelutrustad bana - FS-läge → Full övervakning - Förbikopplats läge → Förbikopplat - Förhandlad avkortning av körbesked → Förhandlad avkortning av tekniskt körtillstånd ESPRI 168, version 2.0 2010-06-11 - Gräns för körbesked → Gräns för tekniskt körstillstånd - Icke ledande läge → Assisterande - Kvitterat nödstoppsläge → Kvitterat nödstopp - Körbesked → Tekniskt körtillstånd - Körbesked ”siktrörelse” OS → Tekniskt körtillstånd ”siktrörelse”, OS - Körbesked ”säkrad rörelse” FS → Tekniskt körtillstånd ” säkrad rörelse”, FS - Nödstoppsläge → Nödstopp - OS-läge → På sikt - Outrustat läge → Outrustat - Slutpunkt för körbesked → Slutpunkt för tekniskt körtillstånd - Spänningslöst läge → Strömlöst - SR-läge → Särskilt ansvar - SR-väg → Förenklad tågväg - STM-läge Nationell → STM nationell - Systemfelsläge → Systemfel - Viloläge → Passiv - Växlingsläge → Skiftning - Termer med ändrad definition eller förklaring Termer där förklaringen eller definitionen endast anpassat till nya begrepp i JvSFS är inte upptagna i följande uppräkning (t.ex. växlingsrörelse bytt mot siktrörelse). - Avvisande spårspärr - Avvisande växel - Balis - Balisgrupp (ATC) - ETCS-identitet - Frisläppningshastighet (ATC) - Rörelseväg (ETCS) - Sidoskydd - Signallåst temporärt lokalfrigivningsområde - Skyddsväxel - Spärrad växel - Spärrat spåravsnitt - Särskild tågväg - Tågväg (ETCS) Läsanvisningar Fet-stil visar källdokumentet varifrån definitionen är hämtad, t.ex. JvSFS eller UNISIG. Kursiv-stil förklarar vad begreppet betyder, men det är ingen regelrätt definition. ESPRI 168, version 2.0 2010-06-11 Index, engelska begrepp och förkortningar -3- End of movement Authority .................................. 26 3TDEA ..................................................................... 29 End point ................................................................. 26 -A- End-of-route release .............................................. 26 Adjacent system ..................................................... 12 Entrance Balise Group .......................................... 19 Advanced Encryption Standard............................ 12 EOA.......................................................................... 26 AES .......................................................................... 12 EoM .......................................................................... 13 Approach locking.................................................... 12 ERTMS .................................................................... 15 Approach section.................................................... 12 ERTMS entrance area........................................... 15 Approximate position ............................................. 13 ERTMS Interoperability Contract ......................... 15 Area locked TSA..................................................... 11 ERTMS Regional.................................................... 15 ASP .......................................................................... 13 ESA .......................................................................... 12 Automatically marked ............................................ 13 ETCS........................................................................ 15 Automaton ............................................................... 13 ETCS ID................................................................... 15 Axle Load Speed Profile........................................ 13 European Rail Traffic Management System ...... 15 European Train Control System........................... 15 -B- Euroradio ................................................................. 15 Balise ....................................................................... 13 ExBG........................................................................ 31 Balise Group ........................................................... 14 Exit Balise Group.................................................... 31 Berth section ........................................................... 13 Externally marked .................................................. 15 BG............................................................................. 14 Blocked .................................................................... 27 -F- Blocked derailer...................................................... 27 Facing points........................................................... 22 Blocked point .......................................................... 27 Facing signal point ................................................. 21 Blocked track section............................................. 27 Flank protection ...................................................... 25 Flank protection area............................................. 25 -C- Fouling point............................................................ 19 CEM ......................................................................... 12 Front protection ...................................................... 16 Centralised Traffic Control system....................... 30 Front protection area ............................................. 16 CESA ....................................................................... 12 FS ............................................................................... 7 CMI ........................................................................... 14 FS MA ...................................................................... 29 Command................................................................ 20 Full Supervision mode............................................. 7 Conditional Emergency Stop Area ...................... 12 Full Supervision Movement Authority.................. 29 Conditional Emergency stop Message ............... 12 Controller Machine Interface ................................ 14 -G- Co-operative shortening of MA ............................ 17 Geographical position information ....................... 17 Co-SMA ................................................................... 17 Global System for Mobile Communications – CTC .......................................................................... 30 Railways.............................................................. 18 GP............................................................................. 21 -D- Gradient Profile....................................................... 21 Danger point............................................................ 16 GSM-R..................................................................... 18 Data Encryption Standard..................................... 14 Data Encrytption Algoritm ..................................... 14 -H- DEA .......................................................................... 14 Hand Held Terminal............................................... 16 Default value ........................................................... 27 HHT .......................................................................... 16 Deflecting derailer .................................................. 13 -I- Deflecting point....................................................... 13 IL ............................................................................ 17 DES .......................................................................... 14 In control.................................................................. 19 Detected position...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9
    POSTbrief Number 20, 26 April 2016 Moving Block By Lydia Harriss Signalling Inside: Summary 2 Railway Signalling in the UK 3 The European Rail Traffic Management System 4 Operating at ETCS Levels 2 and 3 7 Moving Block Signalling 8 Moving Block Signalling and Capacity 8 Virtual Fixed Block Signalling 9 www.parliament.uk/post | 020 7219 2840 | [email protected] | @POST_UK Cover image: The ERTMS/ETCS Signalling System, Maurizio POSTbriefs are responsive policy briefings from the Parliamentary Office of Science Palumbo, Railwaysignalling.eu, and Technology based on mini literature reviews and peer review. 2014 2 Moving Block Signalling Summary Network Rail is developing a programme for the national roll-out of the Euro- pean Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), using European Train Control System (ETCS) Level 2 signalling technology, within 25 years. It is also under- taking work to determine whether ETCS Level 3 technology could be used to speed up the deployment of ERTMS to within 15 years. Implementing ERTMS with ETCS Level 3 has the potential to increase railway route capacity and flexibility, and to reduce both capital and operating costs. It would also make it possible to manage rail traffic using a moving block signal- ling approach. This POSTbrief introduces ERTMS, explains the concept of moving block sig- nalling and discusses the potential benefits for rail capacity, which are likely to vary significantly between routes. Research in this area is conducted by a range of organizations from across in- dustry, academia and Government. Not all of the results of that work are publi- cally available. This briefing draws on information from interviews with experts from academia and industry and a sample of the publically available literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Information Engineering to Understand the Impact of Train Positioning Uncertainties
    Using Information Engineering to Understand the Impact of Train Positioning Uncertainties on Railway Subsystems by Hassan Abdulsalam Hamid A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering School of Engineering University of Birmingham July 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Preliminaries Abstract Many studies propose new advanced railway subsystems, such as Driver Advisory System (DAS), Automatic Door Operation (ADO) and Traffic Management System (TMS), designed to improve the overall performance of current railway systems. Real time train positioning information is one of the key pieces of input data for most of these new subsystems. Many studies presenting and examining the effectiveness of such subsystems assume the availability of very accurate train positioning data in real time. However, providing and using high accuracy positioning data may not always be the most cost-effective solution, nor is it always available. The accuracy of train position information is varied, based on the technological complexity of the positioning systems and the methods that are used. In reality, different subsystems, henceforth referred to as ‘applications’, need different minimum resolutions of train positioning data to work effectively, and uncertainty or inaccuracy in this data may reduce the effectiveness of the new applications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of GNSS-Based Research and Developments for the European Railway Signaling Juliette Marais, Julie Beugin, Marion Berbineau
    A Survey of GNSS-Based Research and Developments for the European Railway Signaling Juliette Marais, Julie Beugin, Marion Berbineau To cite this version: Juliette Marais, Julie Beugin, Marion Berbineau. A Survey of GNSS-Based Research and Develop- ments for the European Railway Signaling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE, 2017, 10 (18), p2602 - 2618. 10.1109/TITS.2017.2658179. hal-01489152v3 HAL Id: hal-01489152 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01489152v3 Submitted on 11 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < A survey of GNSS-based Research and Developments for the European railway signaling Juliette Marais, Julie Beugin, Marion Berbineau, Member, IEEE encountered on the European network [4]. In order to replace Abstract—Railways have already introduced satellite-based all these incompatible safety systems by an interoperable localization systems for non-safety related applications. Driven common solution, Europe has developed the European Train by economic reasons, the use of these systems for new services Control System (ETCS) for the signaling, control and train and, in particular, their introduction in signaling system is protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Ertms Regional and North American Dark Territory: A
    ERTMS REGIONAL AND NORTH AMERICAN DARK TERRITORY: A COMPARISON George Raymond, BA, MS, Independent Consultant, Railweb GmbH, Switzerland Ron Lindsey, BS, MBA, Independent Consultant, Communication Architecture, USA Jörn Pachl, PhD, Professor, Braunschweig Technical University, Germany SUMMARY Railways in both Europe and North America have developed control solutions for lines with low traffic density. These solutions are ERTMS Regional in Europe and “dark territory” in North America, in which conventional signalling is absent and which is now being equipped with Positive Train Control (PTC). To compare these solutions, this paper describes the control systems that have evolved on both sides of the Atlantic for lines with higher traffic density, and how the advent of data radio for safety-critical applications has spawned a new generation of wireless control solutions. Whereas the main objective of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and specifically its European Train Control System (ETCS) is interoperability of trains across national borders, the main objective of North America’s PTC is to increase safety by enforcing movement authorities both under conventional signalling and in dark territory. The paper compares the implementation of these two systems, in particular the ETCS Level 3 that underlies ERTMS Regional and PTC-equipped dark territory. Both systems enforce movement authorities. But the philosophies underlying their designs are fundamentally different: whereas as in ETCS, enforcement is one of the core functions that ensure safety, in PTC enforcement is an independent, “overlay” function that improves the safety of the core system. The paper also examines the potential for moving block and how the approaches for low-density traffic in Europe and North America provide a development path for small or new railways on other continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Intended for Ministerie Van Infrastructure En Milieu
    Intended for Ministerie van Infrastructure en Milieu Document type Report Date August 2013 TECHNOLOGICAL MATURITY OF ERTMS ON THE READINESS OF ERTMS BASED SIGNALLING CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Abbreviations 2 2. Review of the Danish Signalling Programme 4 2.1 Strategic Study 4 2.2 Programme Phase 4 2.3 Operational Preparations 5 2.4 Procurement Phase 5 2.5 Generic Design Phase 7 2.6 Early Deployment Phase 8 3. Assessment of Maturity 10 3.1 Introduction 10 3.2 Methodology 10 3.2.1 Maturity of Signalling 10 3.2.2 System Readiness Scale 10 3.2.3 Capacity Considerations 12 3.3 ERTMS Projects 12 3.4 Evaluation of the Technical Maturity of ERTMS 33 3.5 Results 34 3.5.1 System readiness results 34 3.5.2 ERTMS Maturity Conclusion 35 3.5.3 Readiness of ETCS SRS 2.3.0 36 3.5.4 Readiness of ETCS SRS 3 36 3.5.5 openETCS 37 3.6 Other aspects 38 3.6.1 Effects of ETCS on Capacity 38 3.6.2 Impacts on Migration Planning 38 3.6.3 Impacts on GSM-R Capacity 39 3.6.4 Impacts of Overlay of ETCS with national Train Control 39 3.6.5 Braking Curves harmonised in Baseline 3 39 3.6.6 Key Management System Scalability Issue 39 3.6.7 Adaptability of current ERTMS Products 40 3.6.8 Impacts on Maintenance 40 3.7 Recommendations 40 4. Synthesis 42 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Operational Maturity Issues ON THE READINESS OF ERTMS BASED SIGNALLING 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report contains an update of the Maturity study elaborated in 2008 and includes the main findings experienced during the various phases of the project up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • ERTMS Implementation Plan
    656.25(481) JBV Ert ERTMS Implementation Plan ,-. t __ • ...,,, ....... <o _ ' •• , , ' . Revision: 4 Date: 2009-06-15 Jernbaneverket '-, ~ - ',!.-/ 'f- I.- l \ '. " "l {.I .~. \. ~ ~ ERTMS Implementation Plan '" Jernbaneverket Page: 2 av 29 Revision : 4 Date: 2009-06-1 5 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Changes/Comments Date 3 Document written in English, based on Implementeringsplan for ERTMS, rev. 2009-06-15 4, date 2009-06-15, written in Norwegian. Jernbaneverket Banedivisjonen Teknikk ERTMS Implementation Plan '" Jernbaneverket Page: 3 av 29 Revision : 4 Date: 2009-06-15 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 BACKGROUND .... ................ ... .... .... .......................... ................ ...... .... .... .......... ................ ..... .... ... .. ...... ................... 5 2.2 PURPOSE .................................... .. ... ............................................. ................................... ....... .... ........ .............. .. ...6 3 FUTURE SITUA TION WITH ERTMSIETCS IN EUROPE ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT ................................... .... .... ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GNSS for Train Localisation Performance Evaluation and Verification
    GNSS for Train Localisation Performance Evaluation and Verification Von der Fakult¨at fur¨ Maschinenbau der Technischen Universit¨at Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig zur Erlangung der Wurde¨ eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Dissertation von: Debiao Lu M.Sc. aus: Nantong, Jiangsu, China eingereicht am: 20.02.2014 mundliche¨ Prufung¨ am: 17.06.2014 Gutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h. c. mult. Eckehard Schnieder Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jurgen¨ Beyer 2014 \Measure what can be measured, and make measurable what cannot be measured." Galileo Galilei Acknowledgements This dissertation is based on my research work in Institute for Traffic Safety and Automation Engineering (iVA) at TU Braunschweig in the last four years. Without the sincere support from many people, it would not have been written. I would like to express my gratitude to all the people who made this dissertation possible. Because of you, my research experience in Germany has become a story that I will always remember. First, I owe my far deepest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. h.c. mult. Eckehard Schnieder, who guided me into the rigorous and precise research world. He gave me not only the freedom to explore on my own, but also the structuralised methods to describe every concept clearly. This will be helpful for my whole life. I would like to thank Prof. Dr.-Ing. J¨urgenBeyer for the acceptance of co- supervising my dissertation. His intensive knowledge in GNSS helped me to es- tablish a more stable ground for this dissertation. The constructive discussions and valuable comments are very useful for my further research.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Cost of Smart Wayside Object Controller Livscykelkostnad Av Smart Wayside Object Controller
    DEGREE PROJECT IN VEHICLE ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2021 Life Cycle Cost of Smart Wayside Object Controller Livscykelkostnad av Smart Wayside Object Controller FILIPP ZAROV KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES i Author Filipp Zarov MSc in Railway Engineering School of Engineering Sciences KTH Royal Institute of Technology Title Life Cycle Cost of Smart Wayside Object Controller Livscykelkostnad av Smart Wayside Object Controller Host Company ALSTOM Transport AB Trafikverket External Supervisor Fredric Bonnevier, Head of DC performance, ALSTOM Internal (KTH) Supervisor Zhendong Liu, Researcher, vehicle engineering and solid mechanics, KTH Examiner Sebastian Stichel, Professor, Department of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Date August 2021 ii Sammanfattning I ett regionalt järnvägssignalsystem är utdelar de enheter som ansvarar för att kontrollera spårutrustning och fungerar de som gränsyta för spårutrustning med ställverksdatorn och tågtrafikledning systemet. Dock, tillhörande kablar (signalkablar ock kraftkablar), samt anläggningsinfrastruktur utgör en stor kapitalinvestering och de är en källa till märkbar kapitalkostnad och driftskostnader, särskilt på landsbygdsområden, där tillgänglighet och anslutning till elnätet och ställverket är problematisk. Dessutom, kablar och signalutrustning utsätts för stöld och sabotage i sådana områden. Detta kan öka den totala livscykelkostnaden ytterligare. Shift2rail forskningsprogram, som genomförs av EU och järnvägsintressenter, försöker att ta
    [Show full text]
  • D5.1 State of the Art on EGNSS System for the Rail
    Ref. Ares(2017)1544506 - 22/03/2017 D5.1 State of the art of EGNSS projects for the rail application Project acronym: STARS Project full title: Satellite Technology for Advanced Railway Signalling EC Contract No.: (H2020) 687414 Version of the document: 09 Protocol code: STR-WP5-D-IFS-033 Responsible partner: IFSTTAR Reviewing status: Final Delivery date: 21/03/17 Dissemination level: PUBLIC This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 687414 SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED RAILWAY SIGNALLING CHANGE RECORDS Version Date Changes Authors J. MARAIS (IFSTTAR), J. 01 22.06.2016 First draft sent to WP5 partners BEUGIN (IFSTTAR) Second draft after comments of Jean 02 21.07.2016 Poumailloux (TAS), Karel Veselý (AZD), J. Marais (Ifsttar) Barbara Brunetti (ASTS) Locoprol, Satloc, Girasole, Ecorail added in J. Marais (Ifsttar) 03 22.07.2016 table IV 04 26.07.2016 Added information about 3inSat F. Rispoli (ASTS) 5th draft after comments of M. Rousseau (ALS) J. Marais (Ifsttar) 05 01.09.2016 about Locoprol/Locoloc Inclusion of NGTC and line about NGTC in J. Marais (Ifsttar), P. Gurnik 06 05.10.2016 table IV (UNIFE) 07 18.12.2016 Finale version after ASTS comments J. Marais (Ifsttar) 08 06.01.2017 Final version after TMT approval A. Toma (DAPP) 09 02.03.2017 Completion of acronym list and complement 3.1 J. Marais (Ifsttar) with existing systems STR-WP5-D-IFS-033-03 Page 2 of 61 SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED RAILWAY SIGNALLING TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE RECORDS .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]