DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive MISSION REPORT Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS / IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the World Heritage property Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region (North Macedonia / Albania) 27 - 31 January 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................... 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. 4 Background ..................................................................................................................... 4 Mission methodology ...................................................................................................... 5 Overall state of conservation and factors affecting the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), integrity and authenticity of the property .................................................................... 5 Major construction and development projects within the property and its setting ............. 7 Railway Kichevoe – Lin Pan European corridor VIII ..................................................... 7 New development plans and projects .......................................................................... 9 Progress on previous World Heritage Committee decisions and Reactive Monitoring Missions’ recommendations .................................................................................... 10 Mission’s Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................. 12 2. BACKGROUND TO THE MISSION ............................................................................ 22 Inscription history .......................................................................................................... 22 Extension .................................................................................................................. 23 Statement of Outstanding Universal Value ................................................................ 23 Examination of the state of conservation by the World Heritage Committee .............. 24 Justification of the Mission ............................................................................................ 25 3. NATIONAL POLICIES AND TRANSBOUNDARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPERTY ................................... 26 Albania .......................................................................................................................... 26 Legal protection ......................................................................................................... 26 General Local Plan for Pogradec Municipality ........................................................... 27 Management Plan for the Pogradec Terrestrial / Aquatic Protected Landscape ........ 32 World Heritage Supplement to the Management Plan for the Pogradec Terrestrial / Aquatic Protected Landscape 2017 - 2027 .......................................................... 33 Management arrangements at the national level ....................................................... 34 North Macedonia........................................................................................................... 35 Legal protection ......................................................................................................... 35 Planning framework ................................................................................................... 35 Management Plan for the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region (2020 – 2029) ................................................................................................................... 37 Management arrangements at the national level (North Macedonia) ......................... 39 Transboundary management arrangements ................................................................. 40 Community participation ................................................................................................ 42 4. BOUNDARIES ............................................................................................................ 43 5. IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ISSUES AND THREATS .......................... 44 Insufficient management effectiveness ......................................................................... 44 Type and extent of the threats to the property ............................................................... 44 Environmental threats................................................................................................ 44 Urban sprawl and illegal buildings ............................................................................. 55 Delay and weakness of the moratorium on any new construction .............................. 59 2 Proposed Development Projects ............................................................................... 60 Tourism pressures ..................................................................................................... 66 Use and artificialization of the lakeshore.................................................................... 67 Lack of a Tourism Tax ............................................................................................... 72 Large Infrastructure Projects ..................................................................................... 73 Projects for the conservation of cultural heritage monuments and historic urban fabric ............................................................................................................................ 78 Projects for the conservation of natural heritage ........................................................ 80 6. ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF THE PROPERTY ............. 80 Current state of conservation of the property and trends ............................................... 80 Progress made in addressing the threats and in responding to previous Reactive Monitoring Missions’ recommendations and World Heritage Committee decisions .. 86 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 93 8. LIST OF RECEIVED AND CONSULTED DOCUMENTS AND PUBLICATIONS......... 104 ANNEX 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE, PROGRAMME AND COMPOSITION OF THE 2020 REACTIVE MONITORING MISSION ........................................................................ 107 ANNEX 2. LIST OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE MISSION .... 116 ANNEX 3. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE OF THE PROPERTY ................................................................................................................................. 120 ANNEX 4. MINUTES OF THE FIRST MEETING OF THE TRANSBOUNDARY WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOR OHRID LAKE ............................ 124 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Mission would like to sincerely thank the Albanian and North Macedonia authorities for their hospitality and assistance in the preparation and implementation of this Reactive Monitoring Mission. In Albania, we wish to express our gratitude to Mr. Sokol Gjoka, Secretary General of the National Commission for UNESCO for the successful preparation of the mission as well as Ms. Marsela Plyku Demaj and Ms. Nerxhana Tallushi from the Ministry of Culture. Special thanks go to all officials and specialists met of the following institutions at national and local levels: Ministry of Tourism and Environment; Ministry of Culture; Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs; Regional Directorate of Cultural Heritage, Korçë; Regional Agency of Protected Areas, Korçë; Regional Directorate of Territorial Regulation, Korçë; National Institute of Cultural Heritage; Pogradec Wastewater Treatment Plant; Museum of Pogradec; Institute of Archaeology, Academy of Albanian Studies; UNESCO National Commission; for providing valuable information concerning natural and cultural heritage issues in the Albanian side of the property. In North Macedonia, we wish to express our gratitude to Mr. Hristijan Gjorgievski, Adviser to the Prime Minister, Ms. Ana Petrovska, State Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, and Mr. Zoran Pavlov, Department Head, Directorate for Protection of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture, for the successful preparation of the mission as well as for their continued support throughout the same. Special thanks go to all officials and specialists met of the following institutions at national and local levels: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning; Ministry of Culture; Ministry of Transport; Directorate for Protection of Cultural Heritage; Galičica National Park, Hydrobiological Institute - Ohrid; Public Enterprise Kolekstorski Sistem; Public Enterprise for State Roads; Public Enterprise for Macedonian Rail-Infrastructure; Nezlobinski Museum - Struga; Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments and Museum – Ohrid; UNESCO National Commission; for providing valuable information concerning natural and cultural heritage issues in the side of the property of North Macedonia. Likewise, the Mission wishes to express its gratitude to Mr. Ilir Xhakolli, Mayor of Pogradec and Mr. Konstantin Georgievski, Mayor of Ohrid, as well as their respective cabinets and the officials met from Struga, for the warm welcome to their municipalities and useful exchanges on the management and conservation of the property. Sincere thanks are also due to the representatives of the non-governmental organizations and private citizens of Podradec and Ohrid who met with the Mission, for sharing their views and submitting useful information on a number
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania
    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid the City Where the Cultural Embraces the Natural Heritage
    OHRID THE CITY WHERE THE CULTURAL EMBRACES THE NATURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 1 2 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 3 4 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 5 6 The Management Plan 2014-2020 has been funded by EU funds of the Project SUSTCULT: “Achieving SUSTainability through an integrated approach to the management of CULTural heritage” – South-East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. 7 8 Contents 1 Introduction 11 2 Planning Methodology 15 3 The World Heritage property: Natural and cultural heritage of the Ohrid region 19 3.1 Basic Data 20 3.2 Criteria for inscription on the world heritage list 20 3.3 The territory of the Municipality of Ohrid within the boundaries of the WHP Ohrid region 22 3.3.1 Buffer zone 23 3.4 Outstanding Universal Value 23 3.4.1 Statement of Significance 23 4 Management Plan of the Municipality of Ohrid for WHP: Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 27 4.1 The Management plan for the World Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region 28 4.2 The Main Aim and Need for Management
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Local Governance Project in Albania: Women, Peace & Security (WPS): Gender-Sensitive Value Chain Analysis in Th
    ERALD LAMJA FOR USAID. PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE PROJECT IN ALBANIA Women, Peace & Security (WPS): Gender-Sensitive Value Chain Analysis in the Municipality of Pogradec SEPTEMBER 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech. PREPARED FOR THE UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, USAID CONTRACT NUMBER AID-182-C-12-00001, ALBANIA PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE PROJECT (PLGP). THE GENDER-SENSITIVE VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF POGRADEC WAS CONDUCTED BY CREATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS (CBS) IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE USAID PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE PROJECT (PLGP) / WOMEN, PEACE & SECURITY (WPS). CBS WORKING GROUP: LIANA SULEYMANOVA; ELJO MUCAJ; ALIS MUSTAFA; ERGENT PIRE; ENI ALMETA; PRANVERA GUXHO PLGP INTERNATIONAL EXPERTISE: GRANIA MACKIE - EXPERT IN GENDER-SENSITIVE VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS COVER PHOTO: FIELD VISIT IN POGRADEC. TETRA TECH ARD CONTACT: SARAH LEDDY SENIOR ADVISER/MANAGER [email protected] TETRA TECH ARD HOME OFFICE ADDRESS: TETRA TECH ARD 159 BANK STREET, SUITE 300 BURLINGTON, VT 05401 TEL: 802 495-0282, FAX 802 658-4247 WWW.TETRATECH.COM/INTDEV PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE PROJECT IN ALBANIA WOMEN, PEACE & SECURITY (WPS) Gender-Sensitive Value Chain Analysis in the Municipality of Pogradec DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Tetra
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Study: Socio-Economic Situation And
    Program funded by Counselling Line for Women and Girls This report was developed by the Counseling Line for Women and Girls with the support of Hedayah and the European Union, as part of an initiative to preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism in Albania. BASELINE REPORT Socio-economic Situation and Perceptions of Violent Extremism and Radicalization in the Municipalities of Pogradec, Bulqizë, Devoll, and Librazhd Baseline Report Socio-economic Situation and Perceptions of Violent Extremism and Radicalization in the Municipalities of Pogradec, Bulqizë, Devoll, and Librazhd Tirana, 2020 This report was developed by the Counseling Line for Women and Girls with the support of Hedayah and the European Union, as part of an initiative to preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism in Albania. 1 Index Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Key findings ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Municipality of Pogradec .............................................................................................................................. 6 Socio-economic profile of the municipality .............................................................................................. 6 Demographics ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MDGF-1948 FINAL SIGNED JPD Fyr
    1 2 UNITED NATIONS JOINT PROGRAMME “Enhancing Inter-Ethnic Community Dialogue and Collaboration” 3 JOINT PROGRAMME DOCUMENT Country: “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” Programme Title: Enhancing Inter-Ethnic Community Dialogue and Collaboration Joint Programme Outcome(s): Outcome 1: National Systems and Capacities for Inter-Ethnic Cohesion Enhanced; Outcome 2: Capacity of national education system to promote and enhance ethnic and cultural diversity strengthened; Outcome 3: Inter-cultural sensitivity and civic awareness promoted; Programme Duration: 3 years Total estimated budget*: 4,000,000 USD Anticipated start/end dates: July 2009 – July Out of which: 2012 1. Funded Budget: 4,000,000 USD Fund Management Option(s): Pass-through 2. Unfunded budget: N/A Managing or Administrative Agent: UNDP FYR * Total estimated budget includes both programme Macedonia costs Sources of funded budget: Spanish MDG Achievement Fund 4 5 Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 8 2. Situation Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 8 3. Strategies, including lessons learned and the proposed joint programme ....................................... 14 4. Results Framework .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MHR Review 18
    MHR Review Issue #18 March 2014 IISSN 1839-8707 ContentsMHR Review no.18 published in March 2014 as a review . of. the preceding December-February 3 The Good Neighbour By George Vlahov 5 Venizelos’s Adventures in “Pseudoland” By Dr. Chris Popov 9 Early Elections in Macedonia 2014 By Dr. Vasko Nastevski 12 Identity Politics By Tom Vangelovski Macedonian Bone Marrow Donor Drive 16 April 15, 2014 Vinozhito & The Difficulties on Participating in Elections 17 By Dimitri Jovanov 19 Greek Humanist Harassed by Racist & Anti-Semitic Author February 19, 2014 20 OMO at the EFA Conference By Alexander Spassov 21 The Poetry of Kocho Solev Ratsin By Dr. Michael Seraphinoff 23 An Interview With Simon (Spire) Damevski By John Tsiglev 29 Ottoman Macedonia & Greek Nationalism By Dr. Dimitar Vamvakovski 34 Mladi Bilbili and Vinozhito on Tour in Australia February, 2014 EVANGELOS VENIZELOS: THE ‘GOOD NEIGHBOR’ By George Vlahov We shall begin by noting that even if it dering or itinerant kind, but one who Venizelos, by calling to mind that it is is true that the rumors which assign a is here today and disturbingly, not not unknown for a foreign minister to different original surname to our good gone tomorrow. Thus by way of com- apprehend his or her employment title teacher of civility are false and mali- pensation for tolerating the presence, with literal zest, even to the extent of cious in intent, they serve him well in as Mr. Venizelos would have it, of the treating a time honored neighbor as a the context of the discourse in the paradoxical outlander, the latter, in a consummate alien.
    [Show full text]
  • Alleged Negative Impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park Candidate Emerald Sites Due to Infrastructure Developments (North Macedonia)
    Strasbourg, 31 July 2021 T-PVS/Files(2021)37 [files37e_2021.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 41st meeting Strasbourg, 29 November – 3 December 2021 __________ Complaint on stand-by: 2017/2 Alleged negative impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park candidate Emerald sites due to infrastructure developments (North Macedonia) - REPORT BY THE COMPLAINANT - Document prepared by Front 21/42 T-PVS/Files(2021)37 2 - July 2021 - 31.07.2021, Skopje To: Secretariat Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats For the attention of the members of the Bureau of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Subject: Update on Complaint No. 2017/2: Alleged negative impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park candidate Emerald sites due to infrastructure developments (North Macedonia) Dear members of the Bureau, Since our last update, in March 2021, the Report of the Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the World Heritage of Ohrid Region was published1 and the experts’ assessment that Ohrid Region fulfills the criteria to be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger was confirmed. This assessment was reflected in the Draft Decision 44COM 7B.772, but due to the Amendment submitted by the Delegation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ohrid Region was not inscribed as a World Heritage in Danger. The final text of the adopted Decision is not available at this time – the Delegation of Norway strongly opposed the proposed Amendment and a working group finalized the text which was then adopted without reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid Municipality I
    PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Rehabilitation of various streets and two local roads and procurement of special vehicles for communal enterprise August 2014 OHRID MUNICIPALITY I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY Ohrid municipality is one of 80 municipalities in the Republic of Macedonia and belongs to the South West planning region occupying part of Ohrid-Struga valley, Lake Ohrid and part of Galicica National Park. It borders Debarca municipality to the north, Resen municipality to the east, Struga municipality to the west and Albania to the south. Total area of 383.93km 2 comprises 204km 2 land and 179.93km 2 water. Total population is 55,749 inhabitants. The climate is continental with some Mediterranean influence coming through the mountain of Galicica. There are 18 urban communities and 26 rural communities in the city. Ohrid city and the Ohrid Lake became a world cultural and natural heritage under the protection of UNESCO since 1979. Figure 1: Republic of Macedonia *note: the municipal territory is marked in green 2 Figure 2: Municipalities of the South West region *The South-west planning region is one of eight statistical regions within the Republic of Macedonia. It comprises 9 municipalities: Vevcani, Debar, Debrca, Ohrid, Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Plasnica, Struga and Centar Zupa. B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE According to the last 2002 Census the total number of inhabitants in the municipality is 55,749 from which male are 27,598 and female 28,151 with natural increase of 0.4%. In relation to the ethnic affiliation of the citizens, the prevailing population are Macedonians, representing 85% of the total population (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Implementation of the Plan of Activities for Visibility and Comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020
    Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE FORESTRY AND WATER ECONOMY Managing Authority REPORT on implementation of the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020 (According to Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Sectoral Agreement) (March 2016 – December 2017) December 2017 Project implemented by: IPARD Managing Authority, Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy Str. Aminta Treti 2, Skopje; Tel: +389 2 313 44 77 Financed: Measure Technical Assistance under IPARD Programme 2014-2020 1 Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee I. INTRODUCTION In the period 2016-2017 , the following activities from the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014-2020 were realized: 1. Update of website www.ipard.gov.mk ; 2. IPARD info events; 3. Trainings, workshops and seminars 4. Appearances on national and local radio and television stations as newspapers and Internet portals; 5. Publications of leaflets, brochure, supplements; The institutions responsible for the implementation of the abovementioned activities, respectively to their powers and the functions they perform, were the following: the Managin Authority (MA) within Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy and the Agency for Financial Support of Agriculture and Rural Development (AFSARD). II. IMPLEMENTED ACTIVITIES 5TU U5T 1. Updating the website www.ipard.gov.mk The new MA website www.ipard.gov.mk5TU U5T that was launched in July 2016 is registering great increase of visits and if in the first months the average number of visits was up to 2000, in January 2017, more than 9000 visits have been registered. In the period July 2016 –December 2017 in total 519.455 visitors on the website have been registerd.
    [Show full text]
  • Vkupno Naselenie Vo Zemjata Total Population in The
    REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 definitivni podatoci Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in the Republic of Macedonia, 2002 final data VKUPNO NASELENIE VO ZEMJATA - DEFINITIVNI PODATOCI PO NASELENI MESTA - NASELENIE VO ZEMJATA SPORED AKTIVNOSTA I POLOT BOOK XII XII TOTAL POPULATION IN THE COUNTRY - FINAL DATA BY SETTLEMENTS - POPULATION IN THE COUNTRY ACCORDING TO THE ACTIVITY AND SEX KNIGA KNIGA PRI KORISTEWE NA PODATOCITE DA SE NAVEDE IZVOROT: POPIS NA NASELENIETO, DOMA]INSTVATA I STANOVITE VO REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA, 2002 - KNIGA XII WHEN USING DATA CONTAINED HERE, PLEASE CITE THE SOURCE AS FOLLOWS: CENSUS OF POPULATION, HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, 2002 - BOOK XII Izdava~: DR@AVEN ZAVOD ZA STATISTIKA, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Publisher: THE STATE STATISTICAL OFFICE, "Dame Gruev" - 4, Skopje Odgovara m-r Don~o Gerasimovski, direktor For the publisher: M.Sc. Donco Gerasimovski, Director Broj na stranici: 399 Number of pages: 399 Pe~ateno vo Pe~atnicata na Slu`bata za op{ti i zaedni~ki raboti pri Vladata na Republika Makedonija Printed in Printing House at General Administration Services at the Government of the Republic of Macedonia Tira`: 500 primeroci Number of copies printed: 500 2 Popis na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija, 2002 PREDGOVOR Popisot na naselenieto, doma}instvata i stanovite vo Republika Makedonija be{e sproveden vo periodot od 1 do 15 noemvri 2002 godina. Podatocite vo popisnite obrasci se zapi{ani so sostojba na den 31 oktomvri 2002 godina vo 24 ~asot, odnosno na polno} pome|u 31 oktomvri i 1 noemvri 2002 godina.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Touristic Itinerary in the Region of Prespa Abstract
    International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection Vol. 4, No. 7, 2016 ISSN 2309-0405 CREATING TOURISTIC ITINERARY IN THE REGION OF PRESPA M.Sc. Ema MUSLLI, PhD Candidate University of Tirana ABSTRACT The Prespa Region is located on the Balkan Peninsula, between the countries of Albania, Macedonia and Greece. It includes Greater Prespa Lake and the surrounding beach and meadow areas, designated agricultural use areas and the towns of Pustec, Resen and Prespes. This region is now a part of the Trans-Boundary Biosphere Reserve ‘Ohrid-Prespa Watershed. Greater and Lesser Prespa lakes plus Ohrid Lake are included in the UNESCO world Heritage Site. This area has been known historically for its diverse natural and cultural features. Prespa Region is currently covered by Prespa National Parks in Albania and Greece and Galichica and Pelisteri National Parks in Macedonia. The natural environment and the cultural heritage are a key element designated for the development of the region’s sustainable tourism. This study was enhanced via the Geographic Info System (GIS) digital presentation showing the opportunities for nature tourism in the Pustec and Resen commune. The article also includes two touristic itineraries that will help a better promotion of the tourism in the Prespa Region. Keywords: Touristic potential, cultural heritage, nature heritage, touristic itineraries. INTRODUCTION The Greater Prespa Watershed is located in the southeastern region of Albania and in the southwestern part of Macedonia, in the region of Korçë, commune of Pustec in the Albanian part, in the Resen commune in the Macedonian part and in the Prespe commune in Greece.
    [Show full text]