DOCSLIB.ORG

I Republic of Macedonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Republic of Macedonia Republic of Macedonia I Government of the Republic of Macedonia Ministry of Culture . i National Commission for UNESCO Ministry of Culture Republic of Macedonia No. 34 - 11732/ .2.~ EMBS 4219651 Date:;.~ 11'1 .2018 National Commission for UNESCO To Mrs. Mechtild Rossler Gjuro Gjakovich No.61 IOOOSkopje Director Republic of Macedonia UNESCO World Heritage Centre tel.: +389 (2)23240 517, fax: +389(2)23240 561 Subject: Progress report on the implementation of the www.kultura.gov.mk recommendations of the Decision 41 COM 7B.34 of the World Heritage Committee concerning the World Heritage property "Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region" Dear Mrs. Rossler, With reference to Decision 41 COM 7B.34 adopted in Krakow 2017, and the recommendations by the Reactive Monitoring Mission (held in April 2017), I take this opportunity to submit a Progress Report on the current situation concerning the state of conservation of the World Heritage property ''Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region". Let us take this occasion to once more express our firm dedication in the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. National authorities are ready to provide further information on any issues related to the World Heritage Site "Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region", all necessary clarification about the undertaken activities· and to further improve its content upon derivation ofUNESCO suggestions. Please accept, dear Mrs. Rossler, the assurances of my highest consideration. Prepared by: Tatjana Kraljevska- Lazarova, Counsellor Approved by: Biljana Prentoska,MA, Secretary General ofNa(Com Controlled by: Majlinda Hoxha Berisha, Officer in the Cabinet Agreed by: Irina Dlmovska, MA, State Counsellor PEnY6n~KA MAKEAOH~JA MVIHVlCTEPCTBO 3A KYJlTYPA 5p. )Y ~• lf~l-32-/ 2 ~ Annex 13 of the Operational Guidelines ).~ ht ·20J1.J_roA. Cl<OnJE (~} fiW1 ~~.e UnltedNations World Ed caHonat.Sctentlficand Hentage CliUuratOrganlzatlon Cotwentlon FORMATFOR THE SUBMISSION OF STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS BY THE STATES PARTIES (in compliance with Paragraph 169 of the Operational Guidelines) WORLD HERITAGE NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (Republic of Macedonia) (C/N 99ter) State of Conservation Report on the implementation of the recommendations from the Decision of the World Heritage Committee 41 COM 7B.34 State of Conservation Report on the implementation of the recommendations from the Decision of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee adopted at its 41't session (Krakow, Poland 1 2 17) on the status of the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region- a property inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List This report has been prepared in compliance with the Decision of the UNESCO World Heritage ommittee (41 COM 7B.34) on the status ofthe World Heritage property- Natural and Cultural Heritage o the Ohrid Region (Republic of Macedonia) (C/N 99ter), adopted at the 41st session of the World eritage Committee held in Krakow, Poland. The Decision was adopted based of the recommendations of t e Reactive Monitoring Mission ofUNESCOIICOMOS/IUCN to the property, which took place in April 2 17. The Government of the Republic of Macedonia has reviewed the recommendations set forth in t e Decision of the World Heritage Committee (Krakow, 2017) that refer to the Natural and Cultural eritage ofthe Ohrid Region, and being fully committed to the preservation of the integrity ofthe natural a d cultural properties in the Ohrid region, undertakes concrete steps, in compliance with the UNESCO r commendations. Short summary of the Report The Ohrid Region, situated on the shores of Lake Ohrid, is one of the most representative regions i the Republic of Macedonia due to the great concentration of natural and cultural values. Beginning om the historical monuments of the town of Ohrid, as its centre, than the town of Struga, located along t e banks ofthe Crn Drim River, which flows out ofthe lake, the several fishermen's settlements located n the coast, as well as the richness of archaeological sites, Christian spiritual centres, Ottoman onuments, characteristic architecture and rich tradition, the Ohrid Region possesses an Outstanding niversal Value, which is a result of human impacts and natural phenomena. In 1979, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee decided to inscribe the Ohrid Region on the orld Heritage List as a natural heritage under criterion (iii), that is, today criterion (vii), while in 1980 t e world heritage property was extended to include the cultural heritage criteria (i), (iii) and (iv), and was i scribed in the category of mixed World Heritage properties. In 2009, at its 33rd session (21-30 June 009, Seville, Spain), the UNESCO World Heritage Committee adopted the proposed modification of the oundaries of the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region, thus encompassing a greater part of t e Galichica National Park. This report has been prepared in compliance with the Decision of the World Heritage Committee ( 1 COM 7B.34), on the state of conservatQon of the World Heritage property -Natural and Cultural eritage of the Ohrid Region (Republic of Macedonia) (C/N 99ter), adopted at the 41st session of the orld Heritage Committee in Krakow, Poland (20 17). The decision was adopted in response to the latest evelopment and infrastructural planning projects that could have a negative impact on the Outstanding niversal Value of the World Heritage property, as well as on the observations of the Reactive onitoring Mission, which took place in April 2017. Upon the Krakow Decision, the Report had been submitted to the World Heritage Centre in ebruary 2018. That RepOii presented the progress made concerning the steps undertaken and the degree f implementation of the recommendations of UNESCO's Reactive Monitoring Mission, in the scope of he protection of the natural and cultural heritage in the region. 2 The preservation of the integrity and authenticity of the natural and cultural heritage in the Ohrid r gion is a high priority of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia and a topic of interest of state a thorities, the civil society sector and the wider public. Along with the Government, also the Parliament o the Republic of Macedonia had shown an exceptional interest and initiated activities related to this t pic. Namely, a group of MPs and civic organizations had formed an informal group called Friends of t e Ohrid Region, which intercedes for the Ohrid Region in the Parliament and in front of the public. dditionally, in May-June 2018, the Parliament has held an oversight hearing on the state of conservation o the property and has submitted its opinions and conclusion to the Government with the scope of p eserving the Outstanding Universal Values in the region. Within the process of extending the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region also on the t rritory of the Republic of Albania, the Republic of Macedonia had involved its experts and emonstrated a significant interest by becoming a part of the process of preparation of the nomination !e. In this regard, the Republic of Macedonia has expressed its consent on the extension of the property y sending a letter for support that had been submitted to the World Heritage Centre in April 2018. The cooperation with Albania was also accentuated concerning the undertaking of future steps for t e joint protection of the property, by employing a participatory approach in the quest for joint anagement models of the natural and cultural heritage of the Ohrid region as a whole, encompassing all ake Ohrid region values, for the present and future generations. During the period from the visit of the Mission (April 20 l 7) to the preparation of the State of onservation Report, parliamentary and local elections, and shortly later a referendum (September 2018) ere held in the Republic of Macedonia, resulting in changes at central and local level, but also impacting e timeframe and slowing down the activities for acting upon the Decision. The Government, along with he sectoral authorities and institutions, within the short period of time following the parliamentary lections, seriously devoted itself to reviewing and revising part of the activities envisaged for the Ohrid egion and started to adopt decisions aiming to provide a balance between the future development of the egion focused on the preservation of the historically Outstanding Universal Values of the Natural and ultural Heritage of the Ohrid Region as a World Heritage property. This was an additional and time­ onsuming procedure that had reflected on the implementation of a part of the envisaged activities. The Government of the Republic of Macedonia, at its 40th session held on 28.11.2017, reviewed nd adopted the Information on the Decision of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee adopted at its 1" session (Krakow, Poland 20 17) regarding the status of the Natural and Cultural Heritage of the hrid Region -a property inscribed on the World Heritage List, that was followed by many actions for lfilment of the Mission's recommendations and implementation of the World Heritage Committee An inter-sectoral working group received a mandate from the Government to coordinate the implementation of the Decision and the recommendations. ln cooperation with all relevant competent institutions and the local self-government, this working group had prepared the State of Conservation Report. The updated Repmi on the implementation of the recommendations from the Decision, as well as the undertaken actions, had been adopted by the Government at its 105th session held on 27.11.2018. 1. Response from the Republic of Macedonia to the Decision adopted at the 41st session of the World Heritage Committee 41 COM 7B.34. 3 1. Based on the analyzed documentation submitted by the Republic of Macedonia WHC/17/41. COM/7B. Add, 2. Recalling Decision 40 COM 7B.68, adopted at the 4d" session (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016) 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania
    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid the City Where the Cultural Embraces the Natural Heritage
    OHRID THE CITY WHERE THE CULTURAL EMBRACES THE NATURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 1 2 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 3 4 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF OHRID FOR WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY: NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE OHRID REGION (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 2014-2020 5 6 The Management Plan 2014-2020 has been funded by EU funds of the Project SUSTCULT: “Achieving SUSTainability through an integrated approach to the management of CULTural heritage” – South-East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. 7 8 Contents 1 Introduction 11 2 Planning Methodology 15 3 The World Heritage property: Natural and cultural heritage of the Ohrid region 19 3.1 Basic Data 20 3.2 Criteria for inscription on the world heritage list 20 3.3 The territory of the Municipality of Ohrid within the boundaries of the WHP Ohrid region 22 3.3.1 Buffer zone 23 3.4 Outstanding Universal Value 23 3.4.1 Statement of Significance 23 4 Management Plan of the Municipality of Ohrid for WHP: Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region (within the territory of the Municipality of Ohrid) 27 4.1 The Management plan for the World Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region 28 4.2 The Main Aim and Need for Management
    [Show full text]
  • And Macedonia (Pp
    Summer 2018 - Greece (pp. 1-9) and Macedonia (pp. 9 -16) - Elly’s notes I traveled to Greece for a second summerschool (see here for the first). I left Arizona on a Monday morning and arrived in Thessaloniki on Tuesday afternoon before traveling on to Naxos on Wednesday. Thessaloniki is the second largest city in Greece and the capital of the Greek province of Macedonia. After Naxos, I would be traveling to the Republic of Macedonia which, under Greek pressure, may be changing its name to the Republic of Northern Macedonia (more below). Of course, some Greek nationalists don’t want the name Macedonia mentioned at all and some Macedonians don’t like the change either. When I was here, a scandal erupted of meddling by the Russians who don’t want this `deal’ either since it will pave the way for Macedonia to join NATO. Thessaloniki was built and rebuilt many times: it went from a pre-historic settlement to Macedonian, Roman, Byzantine, and Ottoman rule. Its fire in 1917 made it possible to plan a new city (see picture below). It was on the Via Egnatia (as is Ohrid) which connected Rome to Istanbul and is now a footpath. Old city walls are still around. Thessaloniki’s grid Typical building 1 More varied building styles Thessaloniki citywalls From Thessaloniki, I went to Naxos for the summer school (with some 35 participants some of whom are shown below). Naxos continues to be a wonderful place: lots of history, swimming, and hiking. Some highlights follow below. Summer school (these two pictures are by Kristel Fischer) 2 Moni Chrisostomou overlooks the chora of Naxos; two nuns remain in the monastery, which has a most beautiful church.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS MASTER PLAN for Development and Construction of a Ski Cente R in the Galičica National Park
    BUSINESS MASTER PLAN FOR Development and Construction of a Ski Cente r in the Galičica National Park AD MEPSO d.d. Orce Nikolov b.b. 1000 SKOPJE MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER Our study and report are based on assumptions and estimates that are subject to uncertainty and variation. In addition, we have made assumptions as to the future behaviour of consumers and the general economy, which are uncertain. This Report is for your internal purposes and for submission to strategic partners and potential creditors of the project. Any use of the Report must include the entire content of such report in the form delivered to you. No portion or excerpts thereof may be otherwise quoted or referred to in any offering statement, prospectus, loan agreement, or other document unless expressly approved in writing by Horwath HTL. Reproducing or copying of this Report may not be done without our prior consent. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA © COPYRIGHT 2014 by HORWATH HTL All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without either the prior written permission of Horwath HTL or a license permitting restricted copying. This publication may not be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published, without prior consent of Horwath HTL. MASTER PLAN SKI CENTER GALIČICA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ASSIGNMENT
    [Show full text]
  • MHR Review 18
    MHR Review Issue #18 March 2014 IISSN 1839-8707 ContentsMHR Review no.18 published in March 2014 as a review . of. the preceding December-February 3 The Good Neighbour By George Vlahov 5 Venizelos’s Adventures in “Pseudoland” By Dr. Chris Popov 9 Early Elections in Macedonia 2014 By Dr. Vasko Nastevski 12 Identity Politics By Tom Vangelovski Macedonian Bone Marrow Donor Drive 16 April 15, 2014 Vinozhito & The Difficulties on Participating in Elections 17 By Dimitri Jovanov 19 Greek Humanist Harassed by Racist & Anti-Semitic Author February 19, 2014 20 OMO at the EFA Conference By Alexander Spassov 21 The Poetry of Kocho Solev Ratsin By Dr. Michael Seraphinoff 23 An Interview With Simon (Spire) Damevski By John Tsiglev 29 Ottoman Macedonia & Greek Nationalism By Dr. Dimitar Vamvakovski 34 Mladi Bilbili and Vinozhito on Tour in Australia February, 2014 EVANGELOS VENIZELOS: THE ‘GOOD NEIGHBOR’ By George Vlahov We shall begin by noting that even if it dering or itinerant kind, but one who Venizelos, by calling to mind that it is is true that the rumors which assign a is here today and disturbingly, not not unknown for a foreign minister to different original surname to our good gone tomorrow. Thus by way of com- apprehend his or her employment title teacher of civility are false and mali- pensation for tolerating the presence, with literal zest, even to the extent of cious in intent, they serve him well in as Mr. Venizelos would have it, of the treating a time honored neighbor as a the context of the discourse in the paradoxical outlander, the latter, in a consummate alien.
    [Show full text]
  • Portals and Doors in Traditional Ohrid Architecture
    PORTALS AND DOORS IN TRADITIONAL OHRID ARCHITECTURE Elena Nikoljski Panevski, Vladimir Karanakov ABSTRACT The basis for this scientific work is traditional Macedonian architecture, with emphasis on old doorway of family houses and religious objects (sacral and profane architecture). Ohrid has always been interesting for examination from these aspects, because of the fact that it has lots of historical monuments. The old part of the city contains houses, museums and churches which are one of the quality examples for traditional Macedonian architecture. The main purpose of this paper is to learn more about details in architecture, and of course, the value of details, especially old doors, portals, their dimensions, characteristics, art style, their constructors etc. This is because there is a lot of information originating from literature, books, study works and other written sources about Macedonian traditional architecture, but there is not much information about their details such as doors, windows, portals, etc. These beautiful, genius objects were built in the 19 th century. Today, they attract people who love art with its special charm and beauty, and inspire specialists - architects - for its contemporary application and creation, releasing it from fake values. There are many towns in Macedonia with well-preserved architecture dating from the 19 th century: Krushevo, Kratovo, Novo Selo, Tetovo, Debar, Struga, Prilep, Kriva Palanka, Strumica. Central place among them takes Ohrid, in particular ancient Lychinidos. REFERENCES Adorno, T. (1979): The theory of aestetics, Beograd. Aleksievska Hadzieva, J. (1985): Measurements, antropomorphyc and modular proportion in old Macedonian house, Studentski zbor, Skopje, 154-160. Architectural composition of the old Macedonian house, (1986), Faculty of Architecture - Skopje, 76-83.
    [Show full text]
  • Alleged Negative Impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park Candidate Emerald Sites Due to Infrastructure Developments (North Macedonia)
    Strasbourg, 31 July 2021 T-PVS/Files(2021)37 [files37e_2021.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 41st meeting Strasbourg, 29 November – 3 December 2021 __________ Complaint on stand-by: 2017/2 Alleged negative impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park candidate Emerald sites due to infrastructure developments (North Macedonia) - REPORT BY THE COMPLAINANT - Document prepared by Front 21/42 T-PVS/Files(2021)37 2 - July 2021 - 31.07.2021, Skopje To: Secretariat Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats For the attention of the members of the Bureau of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Subject: Update on Complaint No. 2017/2: Alleged negative impacts to Lake Ohrid and Galichica National Park candidate Emerald sites due to infrastructure developments (North Macedonia) Dear members of the Bureau, Since our last update, in March 2021, the Report of the Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to the World Heritage of Ohrid Region was published1 and the experts’ assessment that Ohrid Region fulfills the criteria to be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger was confirmed. This assessment was reflected in the Draft Decision 44COM 7B.772, but due to the Amendment submitted by the Delegation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ohrid Region was not inscribed as a World Heritage in Danger. The final text of the adopted Decision is not available at this time – the Delegation of Norway strongly opposed the proposed Amendment and a working group finalized the text which was then adopted without reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohrid Municipality I
    PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Rehabilitation of various streets and two local roads and procurement of special vehicles for communal enterprise August 2014 OHRID MUNICIPALITY I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY Ohrid municipality is one of 80 municipalities in the Republic of Macedonia and belongs to the South West planning region occupying part of Ohrid-Struga valley, Lake Ohrid and part of Galicica National Park. It borders Debarca municipality to the north, Resen municipality to the east, Struga municipality to the west and Albania to the south. Total area of 383.93km 2 comprises 204km 2 land and 179.93km 2 water. Total population is 55,749 inhabitants. The climate is continental with some Mediterranean influence coming through the mountain of Galicica. There are 18 urban communities and 26 rural communities in the city. Ohrid city and the Ohrid Lake became a world cultural and natural heritage under the protection of UNESCO since 1979. Figure 1: Republic of Macedonia *note: the municipal territory is marked in green 2 Figure 2: Municipalities of the South West region *The South-west planning region is one of eight statistical regions within the Republic of Macedonia. It comprises 9 municipalities: Vevcani, Debar, Debrca, Ohrid, Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Plasnica, Struga and Centar Zupa. B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE According to the last 2002 Census the total number of inhabitants in the municipality is 55,749 from which male are 27,598 and female 28,151 with natural increase of 0.4%. In relation to the ethnic affiliation of the citizens, the prevailing population are Macedonians, representing 85% of the total population (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Implementation of the Plan of Activities for Visibility and Comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020
    Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE FORESTRY AND WATER ECONOMY Managing Authority REPORT on implementation of the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014- 2020 (According to Article 30, paragraph 3 of the Sectoral Agreement) (March 2016 – December 2017) December 2017 Project implemented by: IPARD Managing Authority, Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy Str. Aminta Treti 2, Skopje; Tel: +389 2 313 44 77 Financed: Measure Technical Assistance under IPARD Programme 2014-2020 1 Organization of the IPARD Monitoring Committee I. INTRODUCTION In the period 2016-2017 , the following activities from the Plan of activities for visibility and comunicaton of IPARD 2014-2020 were realized: 1. Update of website www.ipard.gov.mk ; 2. IPARD info events; 3. Trainings, workshops and seminars 4. Appearances on national and local radio and television stations as newspapers and Internet portals; 5. Publications of leaflets, brochure, supplements; The institutions responsible for the implementation of the abovementioned activities, respectively to their powers and the functions they perform, were the following: the Managin Authority (MA) within Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy and the Agency for Financial Support of Agriculture and Rural Development (AFSARD). II. IMPLEMENTED ACTIVITIES 5TU U5T 1. Updating the website www.ipard.gov.mk The new MA website www.ipard.gov.mk5TU U5T that was launched in July 2016 is registering great increase of visits and if in the first months the average number of visits was up to 2000, in January 2017, more than 9000 visits have been registered. In the period July 2016 –December 2017 in total 519.455 visitors on the website have been registerd.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Post» – Skopje MKA MK
    Parcel Post Compendium Online MK - Republic of North Macedonia State-owned joint stock company for postal traffic MKA «Macedonian Post» – Skopje Basic Services CARDIT Carrier documents international Yes transport – origin post 1 Maximum weight limit admitted RESDIT Response to a CARDIT – destination No 1.1 Surface parcels (kg) 30 post 1.2 Air (or priority) parcels (kg) 30 6 Home delivery 2 Maximum size admitted 6.1 Initial delivery attempt at physical Yes delivery of parcels to addressee 2.1 Surface parcels 6.2 If initial delivery attempt unsuccessful, Yes 2.1.1 2m x 2m x 2m No card left for addressee (or 3m length & greatest circumference) 6.3 Addressee has option of paying taxes or Yes 2.1.2 1.5m x 1.5m x 1.5m Yes duties and taking physical delivery of the (or 3m length & greatest circumference) item 2.1.3 1.05m x 1.05m x 1.05m No 6.4 There are governmental or legally (or 2m length & greatest circumference) binding restrictions mean that there are certain limitations in implementing home 2.2 Air parcels delivery. 2.2.1 2m x 2m x 2m No 6.5 Nature of this governmental or legally (or 3m length & greatest circumference) binding restriction. 2.2.2 1.5m x 1.5m x 1.5m Yes (or 3m length & greatest circumference) 2.2.3 1.05m x 1.05m x 1.05m No 7 Signature of acceptance (or 2m length & greatest circumference) 7.1 When a parcel is delivered or handed over Supplementary services 7.1.1 a signature of acceptance is obtained Yes 3 Cumbersome parcels admitted No 7.1.2 captured data from an identity card are No registered 7.1.3 another form of evidence
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Activity Report
    UNION OF TURKISH WORLD MUNICIPALITIES (TDBB) 2018 ACTIVITY REPORT ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 TECHNICAL PREPARATION Union of Turkish World Municipalities (TDBB) DESIGN Enveriye Sok. No: 26/2 Üsküdar - İstanbul Tel: (0216) 557 82 87 - Faks: (0216) 557 82 85 PRINTING Seçil Ofset 100. Yıl Mh. Massit Matbaacılar Sitesi 4. Cadde No:77 Bağcılar - İstanbul Tel: (0212) 629 06 15 İstanbul, 2019 Merkez Efendi Mah. Merkez Efendi Cad. (Merkez Efendi Konağı) No: 29 Zeytinburnu - İstanbul Tel: (0212) 547 12 00 - Faks: (0212) 547 12 04 www.tdbb.org.tr • [email protected] twitter.com/tdbbweb • tr-tr.facebook.com/tdbbweb TABLE OF CONTENTS PRESENTATION................................................................................................................................4 I. GENERAL INFORMATION...............................................................................................................7 Mission and Vision......................................................................................................................8 Founding Purpose and Duties of TDBB...................................................................................10 II. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION.............................................................................................13 Physical Structure....................................................................................................................14 Administrative Structure........................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]