Upper Permian Vertebrates and Their Sedimentological Context in the South Urals, Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper Permian Vertebrates and Their Sedimentological Context in the South Urals, Russia Earth-Science Reviews 69 (2005) 27–77 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Upper Permian vertebrates and their sedimentological context in the South Urals, Russia Valentin P. Tverdokhlebova, Galina I. Tverdokhlebovaa, Alla V. Minikha, Mikhail V. Surkova, Michael J. Bentonb,* aGeological Institute of Saratov University, Ulitsa Moskovskaya, 161, Saratov 410075, Russia bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK Received 22 April 2004; accepted 7 July 2004 Abstract Fossil fishes and tetrapods (amphibians and reptiles) have been discovered at 81 localities in the Upper Permian of the Southern Urals area of European Russia. The first sites were found in the 1940s, and subsequent surveys have revealed many more. Broad-scale stratigraphic schemes have been published, but full documentation of the rich tetrapod faunas has not been presented before. The area of richest deposits covers some 900,000 km2 of territory between Samara on the River Volga in the NW, and Orenburg and Sakmara in the SW. A continental succession, some 3 km thick, of mudstones, siltstones, and sandstones, deposited on mudflats and in small rivers flowing off the Ural Mountain chain, span the last two stages of the Permian (Kazanian, Tatarian). The succession is divided into seven successive units of Kazanian (Kalinovskaya, Osinovskaya, and Belebey svitas, in succession) and Tatarian age, which is further subdivided into the early Tatatian Urzhumian Gorizont (Bolshekinelskaya and Amanakskaya svitas, in succession), and the late Tatarian Severodvinian (Vyazovskaya and Malokinelskaya svitas, of equivalent age) and Vyatkian gorizonts (Kulchumovskaya and Kutulukskaya svitas, of equivalent age). This succession documents major climatic changes, with increasing aridity through the Late Permian. The climate changes are manifested in changing sedimentation and the spread of dryland plants, and peak aridity was achieved right at the Permo–Triassic (PTr) boundary, coincident with global warming. Uplift of the Urals and extinction of land plants led to stripping of soils and massive run-off from the mountains; these phenomena have been identified at the PTr boundary elsewhere (South Africa, Australia) and this may be a key part of the end-Permian mass extinction. The succession of Late Permian fish and tetrapod faunas in Russia documents their richness and diversity before the mass extinction. The terminal Permian Kulchomovskaya and Kutulukskaya svitas have yielded respectively some 6 and 13 species of fishes (sharks, bony fishes, lungfishes) and 11 and 14 species of tetrapods (aquatic amphibians, herbivorous and carnivorous reptiles of all sizes up to the hippo-sized pareiasaurs and sabre-toothed gorgonopsians). Immediately following * Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 117 9545400; fax: +44 117 9253385. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.J. Benton). 0012-8252/$ - see front matter D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2004.07.003 28 V.P. Tverdokhlebov et al. / Earth-Science Reviews 69 (2005) 27–77 the end-Permian environmental catastrophe, earliest Triassic faunas consisted only of a few fish taxa and small, aquatic tetrapods, in low-diversity, low-abundance assemblages. D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Permian; Triassic; Mass extinction; Tetrapod; Amphibian; Reptile; Russia; Urals; Stratigraphy 1. Introduction dominantly from lakes and small rivers and deltas, with some marine and brackish units in the early The end-Permian crisis was the largest mass Kazanian (Newell et al., 1999). extinction ever, with estimates of the loss of as many Bones of fossil reptiles were reported from the as 80–90% of all species (Benton, 2003). The impact Copper Sandstones of Perm’ Province and the of the crisis on land is less well understood than in Orenburg area in the late 18th century, and the first marine settings, partly because of dating and correla- descriptions were published in the 1830s and 1840s. tion problems, but partly also because there are few At first, these were thought to have been the bones of areas where extensive faunas and floras are known deceased miners, or at least of mammals. Studies by from both the Late Permian and Early Triassic. Russian, English, and German palaeontologists during Indeed, there are only two regions in the world where the 19th century revealed a fauna of dinocephalian tetrapod faunas may be tracked across the boundary: synapsids and temnospondyls that demonstrated links the Karoo Basin in South Africa, and the Russian with the new discoveries from the Karoo of South Permo–Triassic successions, especially in the zone Africa (Ochev and Surkov, 2000). Intensive collecting from the River Volga to the plain south of the Ural by Russian palaeontologists through the 20th century, Mountains. Fossil amphibians and reptiles have been revealed a succession of faunas of fishes, amphibians, known from the Russian successions for more than and reptiles throughout the Late Permian from S to N 200 years, and many summaries have been published, of the Ural Mountain chain. in Russian and in other languages. However, the last We focus here on the Southern Urals area. Late comprehensive overview (Efremov and V’yushkov, Permian tetrapods are known also from the Severnaya 1955) lacked a modern stratigraphic and sedimento- Dvina River, Inta, and the Pechora Basin in the far N, logical context, and new finds have immeasurably as well as from some locations around the towns of expanded knowledge of the faunas. This paper Kotlas, Kirov, Kazan’, and Perm in the central area of presents the Late Permian tetrapod faunas of the S European Russia. The Inta fauna, of possible Ufimian Urals and their context, and it is a companion to Tverdokhlebov et al. (2003), which covered the Early and Mid Triassic tetrapod faunas. Upper Permian deposits are common throughout the whole of the E of European Russia, from the Barents Sea coast in the N, to the Pre-Caspian Depression in the S. The richest sites for fossil vertebrates lie in the S Urals region, around the town of Orenburg, extending W towards Samara and E to the Autonomous Republic of Bashkortostan (Fig. 1). The best exposures are seen close to the major rivers, along the valleys of the Ural, Sakmara, and Samara rivers and their tributaries, as well as along the left-bank (Eastern) tributaries of the Volga. The Fig. 1. Geographical setting of the South Urals region. Permian tetrapod-bearing localities are located in the grid area (shown in whole area lay some 308N of the Permian palaeo- more detail in Fig. 23). For major zones: I, the Cis-Ural Trough; II, equator, and extensive red-bed sediments accumu- the southeastern slope of the Volga–Ural Anteclise; III, the Peri- lated, comprising some 3 km of deposits pre- Caspian Depression; IV, the Ural Mountain fold system. V.P. Tverdokhlebov et al. / Earth-Science Reviews 69 (2005) 27–77 29 age, consists of eryopoid temnospondyls, a captorhi- (1996, 1998, 1999, 2000), Ivakhnenko et al. (1997), nid, and a bolosaurid. The Ezhovo (Ocher) fauna from and Bulanov (1999, 2000, 2002a,b). Ezhovov, near Perm, of late Kazanian and possibly The first attempt to synthesize the data on Permian earliest Tatarian age, comprises various temnospond- and Triassic terrestrial vertebrates was made by yls, estemmenosuchid dinocephalians, and biarmosu- Efremov and V’yushkov (1955). Information on the chians (Chudinov, 1983; Modesto and Rybczysnki, S Cis-Urals was supplemented by Garyainov and 2000). These faunas are not further discussed here. Ochev (1962), who were able to list only seven Upper The stratigraphic subdivision of the Russian Permian tetrapod localities. A later catalogue by continental Upper Permian has been difficult because Kalandadze et al. (1968) gave more localities. The of the general scarcity of fossils. As for the overlying most extensive overview was provided by Tverdokh- Lower and Middle Triassic succession (Tverdokhle- lebova (1976), who was able to include all the new bov et al., 2003), most stratigraphic schemes have sites discovered by the geological surveying teams relied on the sporadically abundant vertebrate fossils from the SGU. Her catalogue was reproduced by and the long-term and substantial faunal changes. The Ivakhnenko et al. (1997). earliest scheme for subdivision of the Upper Permian All the Upper Permian localities in the E of and Triassic of European Russia based on tetrapod European Russia that have yielded tetrapod and fish remains was presented by Efremov (1937, 1950) and remains are in Kazanian and Tatarian deposits Efremov and V’yushkov (1955). This tetrapod bio- (Tverdokhlebova et al., 1989). Here, we review stratigraphy was confirmed and refined through the current understanding of the stratigraphic divisions 1960s and 1970s, and more recently an attempt has in the S Cis-Urals (the Cis-Ural Marginal Trough) and been made to develop a biostratigraphy based on in the SE slope of the Volga–Ural Anteclise, and ostracod remains determined by Molostovskaya outline the geological structure and history of the (1993, 1997, 1999, 2000). region. A broad overview is given of the sedimentary In the 1950s, only a limited number of Permian and environmental history of the region, as well as of tetrapod localities were known, and only from the the evolution of vertebrate ecosystems. The key focus Northern sections; only occasional finds had been of the paper is the sites themselves, documenting for reported from the SE of the Russian Plate. the first time the geographic location, sedimentology, Extensive geological surveying in the 1960s and fossil finds, and age of each site. This documentation 1970s increased the number of tetrapods identified. is a crucial first step in attempting to use the extensive About 80 new localities for tetrapod and fish Russian data to document the effects of the end- remains were discovered in the S Cis-Urals and Permian mass extinction, and to compare them with on the SE slope of the Volga–Ural Anteclise, and the Kazanian and Tatarian successions in the Karoo these were studied by a group of geologists and Basin of S Africa.
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison Formation 37 Cretaceous System 48 Cloverly Formation 48 Sykes Mountain Formation 51 Thermopolis Shale 55 Mowry Shale 56
    THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING By CHRISTOPHER JAY CARSON Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University 1998 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 2000 THE STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE WARM SPRINGS RANCH AREA, HOT SPRINGS COUNTY, WYOMING Thesis Approved: Thesis Advisor ~~L. ... ~. ----'-"'-....D~e~e:.-g-e----- II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express appreciation to my advisor Dr. Arthur Cleaves for providing me with the opportunity to compile this thesis, and his help carrying out the fieldwork portion of the thesis. My sincere appreciation is extended to my advisory committee members: Dr. Stan Paxton, Dr. Gary Stewart, and Mr. David Schmude. I wish to thank Mr. Schmude especially for the great deal of personal effort he put forth toward the completion of this thesis. His efforts included financial, and time contributions, along with invaluable injections of enthusiasm, advice, and friendship. I extend my most sincere thank you to Dr. Burkhard Pohl, The Big Hom Basin Foundation, and the Wyoming Dinosaur Center. Without whose input and financial support this thesis would not have been possible. In conjunction I would like to thank the staff of the Wyoming Dinosaur Center for the great deal of help that I received during my stay in Thermopolis. Finally I wish to thank my friends and family. To my friends who have pursued this process before me, and with me; thank you very much.
    [Show full text]
  • International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Fourth Edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences The provisions of this Code supersede those of the previous editions with effect from 1 January 2000 ISBN 0 85301 006 4 The author of this Code is the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Editorial Committee W.D.L. Ride, Chairman H.G. Cogger C. Dupuis O. Kraus A. Minelli F. C. Thompson P.K. Tubbs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise), without the prior written consent of the publisher and copyright holder. Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 c/o The Natural History Museum - Cromwell Road - London SW7 5BD - UK © International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 Explanatory Note This Code has been adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and has been ratified by the Executive Committee of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS) acting on behalf of the Union's General Assembly. The Commission may authorize official texts in any language, and all such texts are equivalent in force and meaning (Article 87). The Code proper comprises the Preamble, 90 Articles (grouped in 18 Chapters) and the Glossary. Each Article consists of one or more mandatory provisions, which are sometimes accompanied by Recommendations and/or illustrative Examples. In interpreting the Code the meaning of a word or expression is to be taken as that given in the Glossary (see Article 89).
    [Show full text]
  • Sauropareion Anoplus, with a Discussion of Possible Life History
    The postcranial skeleton of the Early Triassic parareptile Sauropareion anoplus, with a discussion of possible life history MARK J. MACDOUGALL, SEAN P. MODESTO, and JENNIFER BOTHA−BRINK MacDougall, M.J., Modesto, S.P., and Botha−Brink, J. 2013. The postcranial skeleton of the Early Triassic parareptile Sauropareion anoplus, with a discussion of possible life history. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58 (4): 737–749. The skeletal anatomy of the Early Triassic (Induan) procolophonid reptile Sauropareion anoplus is described on the basis of three partial skeletons from Vangfontein, Middelburg District, South Africa. Together these three specimens preserve the large majority of the pectoral and pelvic girdles, articulated forelimbs and hindlimbs, and all but the caudal portion of the vertebral column, elements hitherto undescribed. Our phylogenetic analysis of the Procolophonoidea is consonant with previous work, positing S. anoplus as the sister taxon to a clade composed of all other procolophonids exclusive of Coletta seca. Previous studies have suggested that procolophonids were burrowers, and this seems to have been the case for S. anoplus, based on comparisons with characteristic skeletal anatomy of living digging animals, such as the presence of a spade−shaped skull, robust phalanges, and large unguals. Key words: Parareptilia, Procolophonidae, phylogenetic analysis, burrowing, Induan, Triassic, South Africa. Mark J. MacDougall [[email protected]], Department of Biology, Cape Breton University, Sydney, Nova Scotia, B1P 6L2, Canada and Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Ontario, L5L 1C6, Canada; Sean P. Modesto [[email protected]], Department of Biology, Cape Breton University, Sydney, Nova Scotia, B1P 6L2, Canada; Jennifer Botha−Brink [[email protected]], Karoo Palaeontology, National Museum, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia TC Closeout 06-30-12
    American International Health Alliance HIV/AIDS Twinning Center Final Performance Report for Russia HRSA Cooperative Agreement No. U97HA04128 Reporting Period: 2009 ‐ 2012 Submitted: June 30, 2012 Preface he American International Health Alliance, Inc. (AIHA) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation created by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and leading representatives of the US healthcare sector in 1992 to serve as the primary vehicle for mobilizing the volunteer spirit of T American healthcare professionals to make significant contributions to the improvement of global health through institutional twinning partnerships. AIHA’s mission is to advance global health through volunteer-driven partnerships that mobilize communities to better address healthcare priorities while improving productivity and quality of care. Founded in 1992 by a consortium of American associations of healthcare providers and of health professions education, AIHA facilitates and manages twinning partnerships between institutions in the United States and their counterparts overseas. To date, AIHA has supported more than 150 partnerships linking American volunteers with communities, institutions, and colleagues in 33 countries in a concerted effort to strengthen health services and delivery, as well as health professions education and training. Operating with funding from USAID; the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services; the US Library of Congress; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; and other donors, AIHA’s partnerships and programs represent one of the US health sector’s most coordinated responses to global health concerns. AIHA’s HIV/AIDS Twinning Center Program was launched in late 2004 to support the US President’s Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 392 Ecological-Socio-Economic Systems: Models of Competition and Cooperation (ESES 2019) Forecast of Inter-Regional and Cross-Border Interaction Development Between Orenburg and Aktobe Regions Natalia Speshilova Olga Inevatova Rustam Rahmatullin Department of Economic Theory, Department of Economic Theory, Department of Economic Theory, Regional and Sectoral Economics Regional and Sectoral Economics Regional and Sectoral Economics Orenburg State University Orenburg State University Orenburg State University Orenburg, Russia Orenburg, Russia Orenburg, Russia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The national interests including the international II. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY relations between the regions of different countries is of primary importance for any country while building external We should take into consideration that the great number economic relations. International relations between the of border territories are removed from their national markets regions, especially in the framework of cross-border and inter- and are close to the markets of neighboring countries, it is territorial cooperation, contribute to the development and the peculiarity of their economic activity. Moreover, stable expansion of modern states integration. The regions located on inter-regional relations of neighboring countries are essential the border of two states have always been and will be for the production, investment and labour resources usage. interested in close mutual cooperation, since the border position is a geopolitical factor that cannot be changed, but A.G. Granberg [1], A.S. Makarychev, V.E. Rybalkin, A. must always be carefully taken into account when developing a Libman [2], B. Kheifets, Yu.A. Shcherbanin, E.G.
    [Show full text]
  • [PDF] Dinosaur Eggshell from the Red Sandstone Group of Tanzania
    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24(2):494±497, June 2004 q 2004 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology NOTE DINOSAUR EGGSHELL FROM THE RED SANDSTONE GROUP OF TANZANIA MICHAEL D. GOTTFRIED1, PATRICK M. O'CONNOR2, FRANKIE D. JACKSON3, ERIC M. ROBERTS4, and REMEGIUS CHAMI5, 1Mich- igan State University Museum, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, [email protected]; 2College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, 45701; 3Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717; 4Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, 5Antiquities Unit, P.O. Box 2280, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Investigations over the last several decades at Gondwanan Mesozoic Although the age of the Red Sandstone Group is poorly understood (see localities have signi®cantly expanded our knowledge of the diversity Damblon et al., 1998), a Cretaceous age is suggested at this site based and distribution of Southern Hemisphere dinosaurs. These records are on (1) the overall composition of the fauna, which includes titanosaurid? primarily based on skeletal remains, but included among them are in- sauropods and both avian and nonavian theropods, as well as osteo- stances of preserved eggshell, notably from Argentina (e.g., Calvo et glossomorph ®shes, and (2) the possibility that these deposits may be al., 1997; Chiappe et al., 1998) and India (e.g., Khosla and Sahni, 1995). approximately coeval with the Cretaceous dinosaur beds of Malawi (Ja- In general, however, dinosaur eggshell is relatively poorly known from cobs et al., 1990), which lie ca. 200 km southeast of the Mbeya region. Gondwana, and from Africa in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontogenetic Change in the Temporal Region of the Early Permian Parareptile Delorhynchus Cifellii and the Implications for Closure of the Temporal Fenestra in Amniotes
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Ontogenetic Change in the Temporal Region of the Early Permian Parareptile Delorhynchus cifellii and the Implications for Closure of the Temporal Fenestra in Amniotes Yara Haridy*, Mark J. Macdougall, Diane Scott, Robert R. Reisz Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada * [email protected] a11111 Abstract A juvenile specimen of Delorhynchus cifellii, collected from the Early Permian fissure-fill deposits of Richards Spur, Oklahoma, permits the first detailed study of cranial ontogeny in this parareptile. The specimen, consisting of a partially articulated skull and mandible, exhib- OPEN ACCESS its several features that identify it as juvenile. The dermal tuberosities that ornament the dor- Citation: Haridy Y, Macdougall MJ, Scott D, Reisz sal side and lateral edges of the largest skull of D. cifellii specimens, are less prominent in RR (2016) Ontogenetic Change in the Temporal the intermediate sized holotype, and are absent in the new specimen. This indicates that the Region of the Early Permian Parareptile new specimen represents an earlier ontogenetic stage than all previously described mem- Delorhynchus cifellii and the Implications for bers of this species. In addition, the incomplete interdigitation of the sutures, most notably Closure of the Temporal Fenestra in Amniotes. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0166819. doi:10.1371/journal. along the fronto-nasal contact, plus the proportionally larger sizes of the orbit and temporal pone.0166819 fenestrae further support an early ontogenetic stage for this specimen. Comparisons Editor: Thierry Smith, Royal Belgian Institute of between this juvenile and previously described specimens reveal that the size and shape of Natural Sciences, BELGIUM the temporal fenestra in Delorhynchus appear to vary through ontogeny, due to changes in Received: July 18, 2016 the shape and size of the bordering cranial elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Family Tree
    Reptile Family Tree - Peters 2015 Distribution of Scales, Scutes, Hair and Feathers Fish scales 100 Ichthyostega Eldeceeon 1990.7.1 Pederpes 91 Eldeceeon holotype Gephyrostegus watsoni Eryops 67 Solenodonsaurus 87 Proterogyrinus 85 100 Chroniosaurus Eoherpeton 94 72 Chroniosaurus PIN3585/124 98 Seymouria Chroniosuchus Kotlassia 58 94 Westlothiana Casineria Utegenia 84 Brouffia 95 78 Amphibamus 71 93 77 Coelostegus Cacops Paleothyris Adelospondylus 91 78 82 99 Hylonomus 100 Brachydectes Protorothyris MCZ1532 Eocaecilia 95 91 Protorothyris CM 8617 77 95 Doleserpeton 98 Gerobatrachus Protorothyris MCZ 2149 Rana 86 52 Microbrachis 92 Elliotsmithia Pantylus 93 Apsisaurus 83 92 Anthracodromeus 84 85 Aerosaurus 95 85 Utaherpeton 82 Varanodon 95 Tuditanus 91 98 61 90 Eoserpeton Varanops Diplocaulus Varanosaurus FMNH PR 1760 88 100 Sauropleura Varanosaurus BSPHM 1901 XV20 78 Ptyonius 98 89 Archaeothyris Scincosaurus 77 84 Ophiacodon 95 Micraroter 79 98 Batropetes Rhynchonkos Cutleria 59 Nikkasaurus 95 54 Biarmosuchus Silvanerpeton 72 Titanophoneus Gephyrostegeus bohemicus 96 Procynosuchus 68 100 Megazostrodon Mammal 88 Homo sapiens 100 66 Stenocybus hair 91 94 IVPP V18117 69 Galechirus 69 97 62 Suminia Niaftasuchus 65 Microurania 98 Urumqia 91 Bruktererpeton 65 IVPP V 18120 85 Venjukovia 98 100 Thuringothyris MNG 7729 Thuringothyris MNG 10183 100 Eodicynodon Dicynodon 91 Cephalerpeton 54 Reiszorhinus Haptodus 62 Concordia KUVP 8702a 95 59 Ianthasaurus 87 87 Concordia KUVP 96/95 85 Edaphosaurus Romeria primus 87 Glaucosaurus Romeria texana Secodontosaurus
    [Show full text]
  • Dino Cards Project D E F List B
    Daanosaurus Efraasia Dacentrurus Einiosaurus "Dachongosaurus" – nomen nudum Ekrixinatosaurus Daemonosaurus Elachistosuchus – a rhynchocephalian Dahalokely Elaltitan Dakosaurus – a metriorhynchid crocodilian Elaphrosaurus Dakotadon Elmisaurus Dakotaraptor Elopteryx - nomen dubium Daliansaurus Elosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus "Damalasaurus" – nomen nudum Elrhazosaurus Dandakosaurus - nomen dubium "Elvisaurus" – nomen nudum; Cryolophosaurus Danubiosaurus – junior synonym of Struthiosaurus Emausaurus "Daptosaurus" – nomen nudum; early manuscript name for Deinonychus Embasaurus - theropoda incertae sedis Darwinsaurus - possible junior synonym of Huxleysaurus Enigmosaurus Dashanpusaurus Eoabelisaurus Daspletosaurus Eobrontosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus Dasygnathoides – a non-dinosaurian archosaur, junior synonym Eocarcharia of Ornithosuchus Eoceratops – junior synonym of Chasmosaurus "Dasygnathus" – preoccupied name, now known as Dasygnathoides Eocursor Datanglong Eodromaeus Datonglong "Eohadrosaurus" – nomen nudum; Eolambia Datousaurus Eolambia Daurosaurus – synonym of Kulindadromeus Eomamenchisaurus Daxiatitan Eoplophysis - Dinosauria indet. Deinocheirus Eoraptor Deinodon – possibly Gorgosaurus Eosinopteryx - Avialae Deinonychus Eotrachodon Delapparentia - probable junior synonym of Iguanodon Eotriceratops Deltadromeus Eotyrannus Demandasaurus Eousdryosaurus Denversaurus Epachthosaurus Deuterosaurus – a therapsid Epanterias – may be Allosaurus Diabloceratops "Ephoenosaurus" – nomen nudum; Machimosaurus (a crocodilian) Diamantinasaurus
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Beyond
    EVOLUTION ORIGIN ANDBEYOND Gould, who alerted him to the fact the Galapagos finches ORIGIN AND BEYOND were distinct but closely related species. Darwin investigated ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE (1823–1913) the breeding and artificial selection of domesticated animals, and learned about species, time, and the fossil record from despite the inspiration and wealth of data he had gathered during his years aboard the Alfred Russel Wallace was a school teacher and naturalist who gave up teaching the anatomist Richard Owen, who had worked on many of to earn his living as a professional collector of exotic plants and animals from beagle, darwin took many years to formulate his theory and ready it for publication – Darwin’s vertebrate specimens and, in 1842, had “invented” the tropics. He collected extensively in South America, and from 1854 in the so long, in fact, that he was almost beaten to publication. nevertheless, when it dinosaurs as a separate category of reptiles. islands of the Malay archipelago. From these experiences, Wallace realized By 1842, Darwin’s evolutionary ideas were sufficiently emerged, darwin’s work had a profound effect. that species exist in variant advanced for him to produce a 35-page sketch and, by forms and that changes in 1844, a 250-page synthesis, a copy of which he sent in 1847 the environment could lead During a long life, Charles After his five-year round the world voyage, Darwin arrived Darwin saw himself largely as a geologist, and published to the botanist, Joseph Dalton Hooker. This trusted friend to the loss of any ill-adapted Darwin wrote numerous back at the family home in Shrewsbury on 5 October 1836.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Taxonomy of the Iguanodont Dinosaur Genera and Species
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Cretaceous Research xx (2007) 1e25 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A revised taxonomy of the iguanodont dinosaur genera and species Gregory S. Paul 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, MD 21218-3807, USA Received 20 April 2006; accepted in revised form 27 April 2007 Abstract Criteria for designating dinosaur genera are inconsistent; some very similar species are highly split at the generic level, other anatomically disparate species are united at the same rank. Since the mid-1800s the classic genus Iguanodon has become a taxonomic grab-bag containing species spanning most of the Early Cretaceous of the northern hemisphere. Recently the genus was radically redesignated when the type was shifted from nondiagnostic English Valanginian teeth to a complete skull and skeleton of the heavily built, semi-quadrupedal I. bernissartensis from much younger Belgian sediments, even though the latter is very different in form from the gracile skeletal remains described by Mantell. Currently, iguanodont remains from Europe are usually assigned to either robust I. bernissartensis or gracile I. atherfieldensis, regardless of lo- cation or stage. A stratigraphic analysis is combined with a character census that shows the European iguanodonts are markedly more morpho- logically divergent than other dinosaur genera, and some appear phylogenetically more derived than others. Two new genera and a new species have been or are named for the gracile iguanodonts of the Wealden Supergroup; strongly bipedal Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis Paul (2006. Turning the old into the new: a separate genus for the gracile iguanodont from the Wealden of England. In: Carpenter, K. (Ed.), Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs.
    [Show full text]