The Giant Pliosaurid That Wasn't—Revising the Marine Reptiles From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Giant Pliosaurid That Wasn't—Revising the Marine Reptiles From The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland DANIEL MADZIA, TOMASZ SZCZYGIELSKI, and ANDRZEJ S. WOLNIEWICZ Madzia, D., Szczygielski, T., and Wolniewicz, A.S. 2021. The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 66 (1): 99–129. Marine reptiles from the Upper Jurassic of Central Europe are rare and often fragmentary, which hinders their precise taxonomic identification and their placement in a palaeobiogeographic context. Recent fieldwork in the Kimmeridgian of Krzyżanowice, Poland, a locality known from turtle remains originally discovered in the 1960s, has reportedly provided additional fossils thought to indicate the presence of a more diverse marine reptile assemblage, including giant pliosaurids, plesiosauroids, and thalattosuchians. Based on its taxonomic composition, the marine tetrapod fauna from Krzyżanowice was argued to represent part of the “Matyja-Wierzbowski Line”—a newly proposed palaeobiogeographic belt comprising faunal components transitional between those of the Boreal and Mediterranean marine provinces. Here, we provide a de- tailed re-description of the marine reptile material from Krzyżanowice and reassess its taxonomy. The turtle remains are proposed to represent a “plesiochelyid” thalassochelydian (Craspedochelys? sp.) and the plesiosauroid vertebral centrum likely belongs to a cryptoclidid. However, qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis of the jaws originally referred to the colossal pliosaurid Pliosaurus clearly demonstrate a metriorhynchid thalattosuchian affinity. Furthermore, these me- triorhynchid jaws were likely found at a different, currently indeterminate, locality. A tooth crown previously identified as belonging to the thalattosuchian Machimosaurus is here considered to represent an indeterminate vertebrate. The revised taxonomy of the marine reptiles from Krzyżanowice, as well as the uncertain provenance of the metriorhynchid specimen reported from the locality, cast doubt on the palaeobiogeographic significance of the assemblage. Key words: Pliosauridae, Metriorhynchidae, Crocodylomorpha, Thalassochelydia, Kimmeridgian, Jurassic, Poland. Daniel Madzia [[email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1228-3573], Tomasz Szczygielski [[email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-8493], and Andrzej S. Wolniewicz [wolnie- [email protected]; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-8916], Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland. Received 21 July 2020, accepted 14 September 2020, available online 12 January 2021. Copyright © 2021 D. Madzia et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Testudinata and Lepidosauria, respectively (Bardet et al. Introduction 2014; Anquetin et al. 2017). The Late Jurassic was an important time interval in the evo- In Europe, abundant and well-preserved fossils of Late lutionary history of several clades of Mesozoic marine rep- Jurassic marine reptiles are known from the Kimmeridge tiles. Some groups, such as ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, Clay Formation (Kimmeridgian) of the United Kingdom plesiosaurs (pliosaurids and cryptoclidids, in particular), (e.g., Owen 1842; Seeley 1869, 1875; Lydekker 1889; And- and thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs had already become rews 1921; Tarlo 1960; Brown 1981; Brown et al. 1986; globally distributed and underwent significant taxonomic Tay lor and Cruickshank 1993; Sassoon et al. 2012; Young and ecomorphological diversification by the Late Jurassic et al. 2013b; Benson et al. 2013; Benson and Bowdler 2014; (e.g., Bardet et al. 2014; Stubbs and Benton 2016; Foffa et Pérez-García 2015b, c; Püntener et al. 2015; Anquetin and al. 2018c; Zverkov et al. 2018; Fernández et al. 2019). Other Chapman 2016; Moon and Kirton 2018), the Reuchenette marine reptile clades, such as thalassochelydian turtles Formation (Kimmeridgian) of Switzerland (e.g., Rütimeyer and pleurosaurs (rhynchocephalians) were more restricted 1873; Bräm 1965; Meyer 1994; Comment et al. 2015; Pünte- in their geographic distribution and represented some of ner et al. 2015, 2017a, b; Sullivan and Joyce 2017; Raselli and the earliest-diverging, fully marine representatives within Anquetin 2019; Anquetin and Püntener 2020), the “Soln- Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 66 (1): 99–129, 2021 https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00795.2020 100 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 66 (1), 2021 hofen Limestone” (Tithonian) of Southern Ger many (e.g., ported from the Tithonian of Owadów-Brzezinki (Kin and Meyer 1839a; Parsons and Williams 1961; Gaffney 1975b; Błażejowski 2012; Kin et al. 2012, 2013). A partial skeleton Bardet and Fernández 2000; Dupret 2004; Young and de of an ichthyosaur was also reported, but not yet described, Andrade 2009; de Andrade et al. 2010; Young et al. 2012; from the Kimmeridgian of Szczerców (Grabowska 2013; Anquetin and Joyce 2014; Arratia et al. 2015; Anquetin et Maliszewski 2017; Krzeczyńska et al. 2020). Finally, several al. 2017; Bever and Norell 2017), several Kimmeridgian and teeth collected from Zalas (originaly reported by Molenda Tithonian localities of France (e.g., Thiollière 1850; Meyer 1997), Wapiennik, and Częstochowa (initially described by 1860; Lortet 1892; Rieppel 1980; Broin 1994; Lapparent de Maryańska 1972) were recently revised as belonging to tha- Broin et al. 1996; Bardet et al. 1997; Pérez-García 2015b) lassophonean pliosaurids (Lomax 2015; Tyborowski 2019). and Iberia (e.g., Lapparent de Broin and Murelaga 1999; A diverse assemblage of marine reptiles from the upper Pérez-García and Ortega 2011; Pérez-García 2015c), as well Kimmeridgian of Krzyżanowice was recently described by as several fossil-bearing horizons spanning the Volgian Tyborowski and Błażejowski (2019a, b) based on the revision (Tithonian–lowermost Berriasian) of European Russia (e.g., of historical specimens (Borsuk-Białynicka and Młynarski Zverkov et al. 2015a, b, 2018; Arkhangelsky et al. 2018; 1968) and the discovery of new fossil material. Although Zverkov and Efimov 2019; Zverkov and Prilepskaya 2019) both the historical and newly discovered specimens from and the Slottsmøya Member of the Aghardfjellet Formation Krzyżanowice are very fragmentary, Tyborowski and Bła- of Spitsbergen (e.g., Druckenmiller et al. 2012; Knutsen et żejowski (2019a, b) proposed that they represented a no- al. 2012a–c; Roberts et al. 2014, 2020; Delsett et al. 2019). table diversity of marine reptiles, including indeterminate Recent research has provided evidence for extensive “plesiochelyid” turtles, thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs faunal interchange between Late Jurassic seas located in (Machimosaurus sp.) and pliosaurid (Pliosaurus sp.) and Northern, Western and Eastern Europe (e.g., Arkhangelsky elasmosaurid (Elasmosauridae indet.) plesiosaurs. The tax- et al. 2018; Zverkov and Efimov 2019), with the seaway cov- onomic composition of this assemblage was suggested to ering Poland acting as an important dispersal route between be similar to that of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation of the them (Tyborowski 2016; Tyborowski and Błażejowski 2019a, United Kingdom and both assemblages were established as b). Therefore, marine reptile fossils from the Upper Jurassic part of the newly proposed “Matyja-Wierzbowski Line”—a of Poland have the potential for providing data important for transitional palaeobiogeographic region separating marine testing previously proposed hypotheses on the dispersal and faunas from Northern and Southern Europe (Tyborowski taxonomic diversification of European Late Jurassic ma- and Błażejowski 2019a, b). However, when reading the ac- rine reptiles. However, Late Jurassic marine reptile fossils counts of Tyborowski and Błażejowski (2019a, b) we identi- occur rarely in Poland and are often fragmentary or very fied the following problems regarding the taxonomic iden- incomplete (Fig. 1 and Table 1). This hinders their correct tification, provenance, and historical background provided taxonomic identification, crucial for the proper placement of for the fossils described therein: these fossils into biogeographic and evolutionary contexts. (i) The new material (MZ VIII Vr-71) referred to Plesio- Several localities yielding fragmentary fossils of Late chelyidae indet., which was described and figured by Tybo- Jurassic marine reptiles were reported from the territory rowski and Błażejowski (2019a, b) was determined to be of Poland during the 19th and 20th centuries (Fig. 1 and the same material previously described and figured by Table 1). However, the majority of these findings were only Młynarski and Borsuk-Białynicka (1968). The historical briefly described or merely mentioned in Polish or German nature of the material was not recognised by Tyborowski literature (e.g., Jentzsch 1884; Dames 1888; Gallinek 1895, and Błażejowski (2019a, b) and no attention was given to 1896; Deecke 1907; Hirszberg 1924; Molenda 1997; see the original, controversial designation of MZ VIII Vr-71 as Table 1) and have received little scientific attention until “Tretosternon aff. punctatum” Owen, 1842. very recently. Nevertheless, the last decade saw a marked (ii) The specimen
Recommended publications
  • Cranial Anatomy, Taxonomic Implications
    [Palaeontology, Vol. 55, Part 4, 2012, pp. 743–773] CRANIAL ANATOMY, TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS AND PALAEOPATHOLOGY OF AN UPPER JURASSIC PLIOSAUR (REPTILIA: SAUROPTERYGIA) FROM WESTBURY, WILTSHIRE, UK by JUDYTH SASSOON1, LESLIE F. NOE` 2 and MICHAEL J. BENTON1* 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2Geociencias, departamento de Fisica, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota´ DC, Colombia; e-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. Typescript received 5 December 2010; accepted in revised form 6 April 2011 Abstract: Complete skulls of giant marine reptiles of the genera. The two Westbury Pliosaurus specimens share many Late Jurassic are rare, and so the discovery of the 1.8-m- features, including the form of the teeth, but marked differ- long skull of a pliosaur from the Kimmeridge Clay Forma- ences in the snout and parietal crest suggest sexual dimor- tion (Kimmeridgian) of Westbury, Wiltshire, UK, is an phism; the present specimen is probably female. The large important find. The specimen shows most of the cranial size of the animal, the extent of sutural fusion and the and mandibular anatomy, as well as a series of pathological pathologies suggest this is an ageing individual. An erosive conditions. It was previously referred to Pliosaurus brachy- arthrotic condition of the articular glenoids led to pro- spondylus, but it can be referred reliably only to the genus longed jaw misalignment, generating a suite of associated Pliosaurus, because species within the genus are currently in bone and dental pathologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Ichthyosaurian Remains from the La Casita Type Locality (Tithonian, Upper Jurassic), Coahuila, Mexico
    Paludicola 8(2):100-105 April 2011 © by the Rochester Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology LARGE ICHTHYOSAURIAN REMAINS FROM THE LA CASITA TYPE LOCALITY (TITHONIAN, UPPER JURASSIC), COAHUILA, MEXICO Marie-Céline Buchy1 and Anabel Covarrubias Cervantes2 1- Museo del Desierto, Prol. Perez Treviño 3745, Parque Las Maravillas, CP 25015, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. Current address: 1, Tossen Hat, F-22140 Kermoroc’h, France. [email protected] 2- Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Zona Huasteca - UASLP, Cd. Valles, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. ABSTRACT The specimen described here (CPC 306) is the first and only vertebrate from the Tithonian La Casita type locality in southern Coahuila, Mexico. The specimen comprises at least 42 centra from the posterior trunk and anterior tail, as well as neural arch and rib fragments, of an ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur. The size of the centra are comparable to Ophthalmosaurus natans, but the pattern of variation in the centrum height/centrum length ratio and the values of that ratio are more similar to O. icenicus. The preservation prevents a more precise taxonomic identification. Ophthalmosaurus has been reported from Gomez Farias, a site further south in Coahuila. The Mexican Gulf ichthyosaurs show no signs of endemism and have a lower diversity than elsewhere in the world at the time. Thus every specimen from the Gulf at present is important, pending futher discoveries in the region. INTRODUCTION In July 2008, the senior author was allowed by COECYT to excavate and prepare the large A decade of investigation of Upper Jurassic ichthyosaur now numbered CPC 307 (Buchy and outcrops in northeast Mexico has yielded a rich López Oliva 2009; Buchy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • First Occurrence of a Gigantic Pliosaurid Plesiosaur in The
    Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., 2003, t. 174, no 3, pp. 271-278 First occurrence of a gigantic pliosaurid plesiosaur in the late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) of Mexico MARIE-CÉLINE BUCHY1,EBERHARD FREY2,WOLFGANG STINNESBECK1 &JOSÉ GUADALUPE LÓPEZ-OLIVA3 Key words. – Kimmeridgian, Pliosauridae, Mexico, Palaeobiogeography. Abstract. – Reinvestigation of a partial vertebral column from the Kimmeridgian La Caja Formation of Mexico, housed in the University of Linares (Mexico), and previously attributed to a dinosaur, proves to be from a very large pliosaurid plesiosaur. This specimen represents the first plesiosaur described from the Jurassic of Mexico. Its length has been esti- mated at 15 metres and, as a juvenile, is considered to be one of the largest Jurassic marine reptiles. The remains of this animal are here described. The morphology of the vertebral column is not diagnostic beyond family level. Large pliosaur vertebrae of a similar size are known from the Upper Jurassic of Europe, and are often referred to the genera Liopleurodon or Simolestes but these identifications are based only upon the size of the centra and have no taxonomic justification. A portion of rostrum with teeth was discovered together with the vertebral column but is unfortunately now lost. The Mexican pliosaur fills geographical and chronological gaps between western Tethys and South American pliosaurs, and is an additional support to the hypothesis of a Hispanic corridor linking at least temporarily the NW Euro- pean marine province with the western South American marine (Pacific) realm during the late Jurassic. Première occurrence d’un plésiosaure pliosauride géant dans le Jurassique supérieur (Kimméridgien) du Mexique Mots clés.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Ecology and Evolution of Marine Reptiles in A
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The long-term ecology and evolution of marine reptiles in a Jurassic seaway Citation for published version: Foffa, D, Young, M, Stubbs, TL, Dexter, K & Brusatte, S 2018, 'The long-term ecology and evolution of marine reptiles in a Jurassic seaway', Nature Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018- 0656-6 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1038/s41559-018-0656-6 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Nature Ecology & Evolution Publisher Rights Statement: Copyright © 2018, Springer Nature General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 1 The long-term ecology and evolution of marine reptiles in a Jurassic seaway 2 3 Davide Foffaa,*, Mark T. Younga, Thomas L. Stubbsb, Kyle G. Dextera, Stephen L. Brusattea 4 5 a School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, James Hutton Road, 6 Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3FE, United Kingdom; b School of Earth Sciences, University of 7 Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, England, United 8 Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • O'keefe, F. R. 2006
    12 Neoteny and the Plesiomorphic Condition of the Plesiosaur Basicranium F. Robin O’Keefe Introduction Historically, the systematics of the Plesiosauria (Reptilia, Sauroptery- gia) were based largely on postcranial characters (Persson, 1963; Brown, 1981). Several factors account for this bias: plesiosaur skulls tend to be del- icate and are often crushed even when preserved, postcranial elements are relatively common and cranial elements are not, lack of knowledge about the relationships of stem-group sauropterygians, and lack of knowledge of plesiosaur cranial anatomy itself. However, recent detailed examinations of plesiosaur cranial anatomy have identified many characters of use in plesiosaur systematics (Brown, 1993; Cruickshank, 1994; Storrs & Taylor, 1996; Storrs, 1997; Carpenter, 1997; Evans, 1999; O’Keefe, 2001, 2004), and the systematics of the group have changed markedly in response (Carpenter, 1997; O’Keefe, 2001, 2004). The work of Rieppel and others has clarified the anatomy and relationships of stem-group sauropterygians (Storrs, 1991; see Rieppel, 2000, for review). This work has laid the anatomic and phylogenetic foundations for a better understanding of ple- siosaur cranial anatomy. The purpose of this paper is to describe the condition of the braincase in stratigraphically early and morphologically primitive plesiosaurs. In- formation on the braincase of plesiomorphic taxa is important because it establishes the polarity of characters occurring in more derived ple- siosaurs. This paper begins with a short review of braincase anatomy in stem-group sauropterygians. Data on braincase morphology of the ple- siomorphic plesiosaur genera Thalassiodracon and Eurycleidus are then presented and interpreted via comparison with other plesiosaurs, stem- group sauropterygians, and stem diapsids (Araeoscelis).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Xinjiangchelyid Turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the Evolution of the Basipterygoid Process in Mesozoic Turtles Rabi Et Al
    A new xinjiangchelyid turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the evolution of the basipterygoid process in Mesozoic turtles Rabi et al. Rabi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:203 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/203 Rabi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:203 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/203 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A new xinjiangchelyid turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the evolution of the basipterygoid process in Mesozoic turtles Márton Rabi1,2*, Chang-Fu Zhou3, Oliver Wings4, Sun Ge3 and Walter G Joyce1,5 Abstract Background: Most turtles from the Middle and Late Jurassic of Asia are referred to the newly defined clade Xinjiangchelyidae, a group of mostly shell-based, generalized, small to mid-sized aquatic froms that are widely considered to represent the stem lineage of Cryptodira. Xinjiangchelyids provide us with great insights into the plesiomorphic anatomy of crown-cryptodires, the most diverse group of living turtles, and they are particularly relevant for understanding the origin and early divergence of the primary clades of extant turtles. Results: Exceptionally complete new xinjiangchelyid material from the ?Qigu Formation of the Turpan Basin (Xinjiang Autonomous Province, China) provides new insights into the anatomy of this group and is assigned to Xinjiangchelys wusu n. sp. A phylogenetic analysis places Xinjiangchelys wusu n. sp. in a monophyletic polytomy with other xinjiangchelyids, including Xinjiangchelys junggarensis, X. radiplicatoides, X. levensis and X. latiens. However, the analysis supports the unorthodox, though tentative placement of xinjiangchelyids and sinemydids outside of crown-group Testudines. A particularly interesting new observation is that the skull of this xinjiangchelyid retains such primitive features as a reduced interpterygoid vacuity and basipterygoid processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptoclidid Plesiosaurs (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of the Atacama Desert
    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujvp20 Cryptoclidid plesiosaurs (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of the Atacama Desert Rodrigo A. Otero , Jhonatan Alarcón-Muñoz , Sergio Soto-Acuña , Jennyfer Rojas , Osvaldo Rojas & Héctor Ortíz To cite this article: Rodrigo A. Otero , Jhonatan Alarcón-Muñoz , Sergio Soto-Acuña , Jennyfer Rojas , Osvaldo Rojas & Héctor Ortíz (2020): Cryptoclidid plesiosaurs (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauria) from the Upper Jurassic of the Atacama Desert, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2020.1764573 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2020.1764573 View supplementary material Published online: 17 Jul 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 153 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujvp20 Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e1764573 (14 pages) © by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2020.1764573 ARTICLE CRYPTOCLIDID PLESIOSAURS (SAUROPTERYGIA, PLESIOSAURIA) FROM THE UPPER JURASSIC OF THE ATACAMA DESERT RODRIGO A. OTERO,*,1,2,3 JHONATAN ALARCÓN-MUÑOZ,1 SERGIO SOTO-ACUÑA,1 JENNYFER ROJAS,3 OSVALDO ROJAS,3 and HÉCTOR ORTÍZ4 1Red Paleontológica Universidad de Chile, Laboratorio de Ontogenia y Filogenia, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Las Palmeras 3425, Santiago, Chile, [email protected]; 2Consultora Paleosuchus Ltda., Huelén 165, Oficina C, Providencia, Santiago, Chile; 3Museo de Historia Natural y Cultural del Desierto de Atacama. Interior Parque El Loa s/n, Calama, Región de Antofagasta, Chile; 4Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Barrio Universitario, Concepción, Región del Bío Bío, Chile ABSTRACT—This study presents the first plesiosaurs recovered from the Jurassic of the Atacama Desert that are informative at the genus level.
    [Show full text]
  • Carettochelys Insculpta) in the KIKORI REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA
    NESTING ECOLOGY, HARVEST AND CONSERVATION OF THE PIG-NOSED TURTLE (Carettochelys insculpta) IN THE KIKORI REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA by CARLA CAMILO EISEMBERG DE ALVARENGA B.Sc. (Federal University of Minas Gerais – UFMG) (2004) M.Sc. (National Institute for Amazon Research) (2006) Institute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Canberra. October 2010 Certificate of Authorship of Thesis Except where clearly acknowledged in footnotes, quotations and the bibliography, I certify that I am the sole author of the thesis submitted today, entitled Nesting ecology, harvest and conservation of the Pig-nosed turtle (Carettochelys insculpta) in the Kikori region, Papua New Guinea I further certify that to the best of my knowledge the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. The material in the thesis has not been the basis of an award of any other degree or diploma.The thesis complies with University requirements for a thesis as set out in Gold Book Part 7: Examination of Higher Degree by Research Theses Policy, Schedule Two (S2). …………………………………………… Signature of Candidate .......................................................................... Signature of chair of the supervisory panel ………15-Mar-11…………………….. Date Copyright This thesis (© by Carla C. Eisemberg, 2010) may be freely copied or distributed for private and/or commercial use and study. However, no part of this thesis or the information herein may be included in a publication or referred to in a publication without the written consent of Carla C.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Meeting of the Kimmeridgian Working Group
    Volumina Jurassica, 2015, Xiii (2): 153–158 Report of the Meeting of the Kimmeridgian Working Group Andrzej WIERZBOWSKI1 Convenor of the Kimmeridgian W.G. The Kimmeridgian Working Group Meeting organized under auspices of the International Subcomission on Ju- rassic Stratigraphy took place in Poland between 18 and 21 May 2015 at the Polish Geological Institute – National Research Institute in Warsaw, with a one and a half day excursion to the Jurassic outcrops in the Wieluń Upland (Polish Jura). It was arranged to discuss new advances in recognition of a unique base of the Kimmeridgian Stage, the Oxfordian/Kimmeridgian boundary since 2006 when the first proposal for the GSSP was made (see Wierzbowski et al., 2006). Fifteen researchers were present, mainly members of the Kimmeridgian Working Group: C. D’Arpa (Geological Museum, University of Palermo), M. Barski (Geological Faculty, University of Warsaw), E. Głowniak (Geological Faculty, University of Warsaw), J. Grabowski (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), S. Hesselbo (University of Exeter, chairmen of ISJS), M. Hodbod (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), B. Matyja (Geological Faculty, University of War- saw), A. Mironenko (Russia), N. Morton (former ISJS chairman, France), M. Rogov (Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow), G. Schweigert (Staatliches Museum, Stuttgart), J. Smoleń (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), K. Sobień (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), A. Wierzbowski (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), H. Wierz­ bowski (Polish Geological Institute – NRI), J. Wright (Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London). Twelve presentations were given (including two posters). These included several aspects of the Oxfordian/ Kimmeridgian boundary such as ammonite biostratigraphy, dinoflagellate cyst biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, geochemistry (both carbon and oxygen records as well as other geochemical data along with geochemical studies which enable the recognition of the paleoenvironmental changes in the succession).
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Evolutionary Rates in Mosasauroids and Plesiosaurs: Discussion of Niche Occupation in Late Cretaceous Seas
    Estimating the evolutionary rates in mosasauroids and plesiosaurs: discussion of niche occupation in Late Cretaceous seas Daniel Madzia1 and Andrea Cau2 1 Department of Evolutionary Paleobiology, Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland 2 Independent, Parma, Italy ABSTRACT Observations of temporal overlap of niche occupation among Late Cretaceous marine amniotes suggest that the rise and diversification of mosasauroid squamates might have been influenced by competition with or disappearance of some plesiosaur taxa. We discuss that hypothesis through comparisons of the rates of morphological evolution of mosasauroids throughout their evolutionary history with those inferred for contemporary plesiosaur clades. We used expanded versions of two species- level phylogenetic datasets of both these groups, updated them with stratigraphic information, and analyzed using the Bayesian inference to estimate the rates of divergence for each clade. The oscillations in evolutionary rates of the mosasauroid and plesiosaur lineages that overlapped in time and space were then used as a baseline for discussion and comparisons of traits that can affect the shape of the niche structures of aquatic amniotes, such as tooth morphologies, body size, swimming abilities, metabolism, and reproduction. Only two groups of plesiosaurs are considered to be possible niche competitors of mosasauroids: the brachauchenine pliosaurids and the polycotylid leptocleidians. However, direct evidence for interactions between mosasauroids and plesiosaurs is scarce and limited only to large mosasauroids as the Submitted 31 July 2019 predators/scavengers and polycotylids as their prey. The first mosasauroids differed Accepted 18 March 2020 from contemporary plesiosaurs in certain aspects of all discussed traits and no evidence Published 13 April 2020 suggests that early representatives of Mosasauroidea diversified after competitions with Corresponding author plesiosaurs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Classification of the Plesiosauria with a Synopsis of the Stratigraphical and Geographical Distribution Of
    LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 2. Bd 59. Nr l. KUNGL. FYSIOGRAFISKA SÅLLSKAPETS HANDLINGAR, N. F. Bd 74. Nr 1. A REVISION OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PLESIOSAURIA WITH A SYNOPSIS OF THE STRATIGRAPHICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE GROUP BY PER OVE PERSSON LUND C. W. K. GLEER UP Read before the Royal Physiographic Society, February 13, 1963. LUND HÅKAN OHLSSONS BOKTRYCKERI l 9 6 3 l. Introduction The sub-order Plesiosauria is one of the best known of the Mesozoic Reptile groups, but, as emphasized by KuHN (1961, p. 75) and other authors, its classification is still not satisfactory, and needs a thorough revision. The present paper is an attempt at such a revision, and includes also a tabular synopsis of the stratigraphical and geo­ graphical distribution of the group. Some of the species are discussed in the text (pp. 17-22). The synopsis is completed with seven maps (figs. 2-8, pp. 10-16), a selective synonym list (pp. 41-42), and a list of rejected species (pp. 42-43). Some forms which have been erroneously referred to the Plesiosauria are also briefly mentioned ("Non-Plesiosaurians", p. 43). - The numerals in braekets after the generic and specific names in the text refer to the tabular synopsis, in which the different forms are numbered in successional order. The author has exaroined all material available from Sweden, Australia and Spitzbergen (PERSSON 1954, 1959, 1960, 1962, 1962a); the major part of the material from the British Isles, France, Belgium and Luxembourg; some of the German spec­ imens; certain specimens from New Zealand, now in the British Museum (see LYDEK­ KER 1889, pp.
    [Show full text]