DOCSLIB.ORG

OCHA in 2002 UNITED NATIONS Activities and Extrabudgetary Funding Requirements OCHA in 2002 OCHA UNITED NATIONS OFFICE for the COORDINATION of HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OCHA in 2002 UNITED NATIONS Activities and Extrabudgetary Funding Requirements OCHA in 2002 OCHA UNITED NATIONS OFFICE for the COORDINATION of HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OCHA IN 2002 UNITED NATIONS Activities and Extrabudgetary Funding Requirements OCHA IN 2002 OCHA UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OCHA IN 2002 ACTIVITIES AND EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDING REQUIREMENTS UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2002 EDITORIAL TEAM Prepared by the staff of OCHA, under the direction of Ed Tsui, Director of OCHA, New York, following the inspiration of the late Ernest Chipman, formerly Chief of OCHA’s Response Coordination Branch. Managing Editor: Angela Berry-Koch Support Editors: Kelly David-Toweh, Magda Ninaber van Eyben, Christina Bennett, Pamela Jennings, Rosa Rosetti, Rebecca Maluto Graphics and Tables: Luciano Natale Layout: Rosa Rosetti and Graphic Studio, Ferney Voltaire, France Cover: Graphic Studio, Ferney Voltaire, France. Maps: Carrie Howard, OCHA/DPI - Cartographic Section, New York Financial data has been provided by OCHA Executive Administrative Offices Cover Photos: Allegra Baiocchi For additional Information, please contact: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Response Coordination Branch Magda Ninaber van Eyben Telephone: (4122) 917 1864 E-mail: [email protected] Dedicated to the memory of Ernest Dewitt Chipman We are grateful for the inspiration of his humanitarian service. 1950 - 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................VIII INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................1 OCHA 2002 IN FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................................................3 OCHA GLOBAL PRESENCE..............................................................................................................................................................................4 NATURAL DISASTERS ASSESSMENTS........................................................................................................................................................5 OCHA ORGANIGRAMME ................................................................................................................................................................................6 SECTION ONE - EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................................7 Office of the Under-Secretary-General (USG) and Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC), Deputy ERC (DERC) and Director of the New York Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)......................................................................................................................................8 Office of the Director of OCHA Geneva / Assistant Emergency Relief Coordinator (AERC) ..................................10 Executive & Administrative Offices – New York/Geneva ..............................................................................................................11 Administrative Office -Geneva ....................................................................................................................................................................12 Staff Development and Learning Project ................................................................................................................................................14 Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) / Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs (ECHA) Secretariat ........................................................................................................................................15 SECTION TWO - ACTIVITIES AT HEADQUARTERS CHAPTER ONE - EMERGENCY RESPONSE COORDINATION AND SUPPORT ..........................................................17 Humanitarian Emergency Branch (HEB) – New York ......................................................................................................................18 Response Coordination Branch (RCB) – Geneva ..............................................................................................................................20 CAP Strengthening Project ........................................................................................................................................................22 Emergency Services Branch (ESB) – Geneva ........................................................................................................................................23 Field Coordination Support Project......................................................................................................................................25 Military, Civil Defence and Logistics Support Project ..............................................................................................25 OCHA/UNEP Environmental Response Project ............................................................................................................26 Emergency Telecommunications Project ..........................................................................................................................27 Surge Capacity Project ................................................................................................................................................................28 Internal Displacement Unit ............................................................................................................................................................................29 CHAPTER TWO - POLICY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................................................31 Policy Development and Studies Branch (PDSB) ..............................................................................................................................32 Humanitarian Impact of Sanctions & Protection of Civilians Project ..............................................................34 Public / Private Partnerships Project ....................................................................................................................................34 Lessons Learned and Evaluations Project ........................................................................................................................35 CHAPTER THREE - ADVOCACY AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS ..............................................................................................37 Advocacy and External Relations Section ..............................................................................................................................................38 Chernobyl Project ..........................................................................................................................................................................41 V CHAPTER FOUR - INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................................43 Information Management Section ..............................................................................................................................................................44 Field Information Support Project ........................................................................................................................................47 ReliefWeb Project ..........................................................................................................................................................................49 SECTION THREE - COORDINATION ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD ............................................................51 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................52 AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST ANGOLA..................................................................................................................................................................................................54 BURUNDI ................................................................................................................................................................................................56 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO ....................................................................................................................................58 ERITREA....................................................................................................................................................................................................60 ETHIOPIA ................................................................................................................................................................................................62 GUINEA ..................................................................................................................................................................................................64 LIBERIA ....................................................................................................................................................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Policy in the Post-Crisis Context of Small Island Developing States: a Synthesis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Perch, Leisa; Roy, Rathin Working Paper Social policy in the post-crisis context of small island developing states: A synthesis Working Paper, No. 67 Provided in Cooperation with: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) Suggested Citation: Perch, Leisa; Roy, Rathin (2010) : Social policy in the post-crisis context of small island developing states: A synthesis, Working Paper, No. 67, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), Brasilia This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/71774 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Live Rock Harvesting on Fish Abundance, Substrate Composition and Reef Topography Along the Coral Coast, Fiji Islands
    The impact of live rock harvesting on fish abundance, substrate composition and reef topography along the Coral Coast, Fiji Islands By Make Liku Movono A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science School of Marine Studies Faculty of Island and Oceans The University of the South Pacific December, 2007 Dedication This is for my Normie and to God Almighty! Declaration of Originality I Make Liku Movono declare that this thesis is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material previously published or substantially overlapping with material submitted for the award of any other degree at any institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text. Make Liku Movono Date The current research was conducted under mine and other co-supervisors and I am certain that this is the sole work of Ms Make Liku Movono. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and Foremost, I would like to thank my God Almighty for bringing me through these challenging times and has never failed me! In addition to this, acknowledging the financial assistance by the Institute of Applied Science at the University of the South Pacific with which this project would not have been possible. A big “vinaka vakalevu” to Professor William Aalbersberg for giving me an opportunity to work on a challenging and vital issue. To the communities, whom without their concern, this study would not have been initiated. A very big “vinaka vakalevu” to Dr James Reynolds, who was with me from “scratch” till the very end, justifying every detail of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter and Settlements Risk Profile NATURAL DISASTERS from 1980
    Shelter and Settlements Risk Profile ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter HISTORIC EVENTS (ReliefWeb) Dec 2012 1. Tropical Cyclone Evan KEY DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS Tropical Cyclone Evan (TC Evan) − a Category 4 cyclone, wind Full Name: Republic Of The Fiji Islands speeds of 210 km/h (130 mph), impacted Northern Vanua Population: 862,333 (UN, 2012) Levu and Western Viti Levu on 17 December 2012,is Annual Growth Rate: 0.5% considered one of the worst to ever hit Fiji in recent history. Capital: Suva Approximately 60% of the total population were affected in Population In Urban Areas: 52.90% the post-disaster period. The Northern division recorded the Area: 18,376 Sq Km(7,095 Sq.mile) highest percentage of affected population (52%) as a Major Languages: English, Fijian, Hindi proportion of their total population, followed by the Western Division (38%) and the Central and Eastern divisions (23%). Major Religions: Christianity, Hinduism, Islam March 2. Fiji: Floods Life Expectancy: (UN) 67 Years (M)/72 Years (W) 2012 Monetary Unit: 1 Fijian Dollar = 100 Cents Severe flooding in the areas of Ra, Tavua, Ba, Lautoka, Nadi, Main Exports: Sugar, Clothing, Gold, Processed Nadroga, Sigatoka, and Rewa in January 2012 The Fish, Timber Government of Fiji estimated that damage from the 2012 GNI Per Capita: US $3,720 (WB) 5,390 (FS) floods was at approximately F$71 million. This suggests that Human Development Index: 0.6881 Fiji experienced damage of F$146 million in 2012 alone. Rainfall In Capital (Mm): 3040 Jan 3. Fiji: Floods Temperature In Capital City ° C: 22.2/28.7 2012 Average Family Size: 5 March 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Coral Reefs in the Fiji Islands 2007
    COMPONENT 2A - Project 2A2 Knowledge, monitoring, management and beneficial use of coral reef ecosystems January 2009 REEF MONITORING SOUTH-WEST PACIFIC STATUS OF CORAL REEFS REPORT 2007 Edited by Cherrie WHIPPY-MORRIS Institute of Marine Resources With the support of: Photo: E. CLUA The CRISP programme is implemented as part of the Regional Environment Programme for a contribution to conservation and sustainable development of coral T (CRISP), sponsored by France and prepared by the French Development Agency (AFD) as part of an inter-ministerial project from 2002 onwards, aims to develop a vi- sion for the future of these unique eco-systems and the communities that depend on them and to introduce strategies and projects to conserve their biodiversity, while developing the economic and environmental services that they provide both locally and globally. Also, it is designed as a factor for integration between developed coun- - land developing countries. The CRISP Programme comprises three major components, which are: Component 1A: Integrated Coastal Management and watershed management - 1A1: Marine biodiversity conservation planning - 1A2: Marine Protected Areas - 1A3: Institutional strengthening and networking - 1A4: Integrated coastal reef zone and watershed management CRISP Coordinating Unit (CCU) Component 2: Development of Coral Ecosystems Programme manager : Eric CLUA - 2A: Knowledge, monitoring and management of coral reef ecosytems SPC - PoBox D5 - 2B: Reef rehabilitation 98848 Noumea Cedex - 2C: Development of active marine substances
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Barriers to The
    Pacific Islands Renewable SPREP Energy Project A climate change partnership of GEF, UNDP, SPREP and the Pacific Islands Pacific Regional Energy Assessment 2004 An Assessment of the Key Energy Issues, Barriers to the Development of Renewable Energy to Mitigate Climate Change, and Capacity Development Needs for Removing the Barriers VANUATU National Report PIREP our islands, our lives… Currency Equivalent: US$ 1.00 = Vatu (Vt) 110 in March 2004 (but highly variable around the time) Fiscal Year: 1 January – 31 December Time Zone: GMT/UTC +11 hours This report is based on data gathered by a PIREP team consisting of: Mr Ruben Bakeo National PIREP Coordinator Mr Anare Matakiviti SOPAC Energy Adviser / National PIREP Consultant Mr Peter Johnston International PIREP Consultant; and Mr John Vos International PIREP Consultant The consultants visited Vanuatu in January and early February 2004. Because a suitable national consultant was unavailable at that time, SOPAC provided the services of its Energy Adviser. In addition to discussions in Port Vila, there were field trips to visit renewable energy projects (and potential project sites) on the islands of Efate and Espiritu Santo. Unfortunately the head of Government Energy Unit and several other key staff were unavailable for discussions during the mission’s visit. The local offices of the international oil companies were unwilling to provide any information on their product sales, an omission that has hindered some analysis. This report reviews the status of energy sector activities in Vanuatu through February 2004. An earlier draft of this report was reviewed by the Vanuatu National PIREP Committee (the National Advisory Committee on Climate Change), which provided thoughtful, useful and substantive feedback, and by Secretariat Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP), South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC), United Nations Development Programme and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Released Under the Official Information Act 1982
    Page 1 of 3 Document 12 Item of business : Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill Submission name : Barbara McKenzie Comments SUBMISSION TO THE CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSE (ZERO CARBON) AMENDMENT BILL. There is no logic to the "Zero Carbon" bill whatsoever. It flies in the face of all serious scientific evidence - its only function appears to be to please the UN bureaucracy and the elite foundations which are affiliated with and exert considerable influence over that bureaucracy. HUMAN GENERATED CO2 IS NOT CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING There is no evidence that CO2 causes global warming Ice core data indicates that CO2 levels lag warming by hundreds of years, rather than driving it. See e.g Mudelsee (2001, attached), who found that "over the full 420,000 year Vostok history CO2 variations lag temperature by 1,300 years ± 1000". Studies show that the warming period which began in the 1970s, and was the reason for abandoning alarmist claims of a new ice-age in favour of "global warming", eased off around 1998, and scientists are predicting a worrying cooling, even a mini-ice age. In any case: Of total CO2 levels human activity is responsible for 3-5% of atmospheric CO2, while New Zealand's contribution is about 0.1%. Nothing will be achieved by NZ going "zero carbon" when other bigger countriesRELEASED are focused on development UNDER and improving their THE citizens' quality of life - it is pure grandstanding At the same time New Zealand is squandering its credibility which would be better spent drawing attention to real environmental issues. METHANE Undermining New Zealand's dairy industry on the back of the climate hoax is another government target.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Star* Session 2001
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE STAR* SESSION 2001 John Collen & Peter Rodda Editors SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 445 * Science, Technology and Resources Network [2] [SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 445 – Collen & Rodda] [3] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ................................................................................................4 PROGRAM OF STAR PRESENTATIONS ........................................................5 ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS..............................................................................7 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS ..........................................................................46 LATE ABSTRACT(S)...................................................................................49 [SOPAC Miscellaneous Report 445 – Collen & Rodda] [4] FOREWORD STAR (SOPAC's Science, Technology and Resources network) was founded in 1985 in collaboration with IOC. The first Chairman of STAR, Dr Charles Helsley, then Director of the Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, guided STAR until 1992. He was succeeded by Keith Crook from the Hawaii Undersea Research Laboratory. Keith served until the end of 1999 when John Collen from Victoria University became Chairman. STAR was formed as a vehicle to assist the international geoscience community to provide advice to SOPAC, particularly during the intervals between SOPAC International Workshops, the most recent of which was the ENSO Workshop, held in Nadi from 19 to 23 October, 1999. STAR meetings are not simply technical conferences at which individuals present scientific
    [Show full text]
  • I#) Pacific Islands Ausaid FOREST and TREES
    Australian Government i#) Pacific Islands AusAID FOREST and TREES Incorporating SPRIG, ACIAR-PNG Forest Domestication Project, SPC/GTZ Pacific German Regional Forestry Project and Pacific Forestry Updates. No. 1/05 ISSN: 1605 - 5462 From the Programme Desk Page/s Contents In this first issue for 2005, we Since this year's mode of operation of 1-6 Country Updates introduce some of the main activities the Land Resources Division is totally that the SPC Forests and Trees new, we expect to encounter some Programme Activities Programme plans to implement teething problems as we move forward Kiribati Pandanus Poster during the year. In line with the in implementing our planned activities. Pacific Coconut Timber Strategic Plan for 2005-2008 which But we are very excited about this new Group was endorsed last year for SPC's new development, and it is our intention RILSIM Training integrated Land Resources Division, to give it our maximum support to which now includes the Forests and ensure its success for the benefit of Trees Programme, our planned all our Pacific Island communities. News activities will fall under the following Optimising spacing regimes two main objectives of the plan: To our donors, collaborators and for whitewood plantations partners, we thank you for your in Vanuatu Sustainable management of continued faith in us, and we request Saving PNG Sandalwood integrated forest and your understanding and support as from extinction agricultural systems we travel together this new path for Improved biosecurity and LRD to provide better and more 11-16 PGRFP Updates trade facilitation effective services to our member countries and territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Country Assessment Vanuatu
    UUNNIITTEEDD NNAATTIIOONNSS COMMON COUNTRY ASSESSMENT VVAANNUUAATTUU (Revised Draft of May 2002) Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator Suva, Fiji May 2002 United Nations UNICEF Population Fund UNIFEM FAO ILO UNESCO WHO Table of Contests TABLE OF CONTENTS BOXES ......................................................................................................................II TABLES ....................................................................................................................II FIGURES...................................................................................................................II ANNEXES.................................................................................................................II MAPS..........................................................................................................................I FOREWARD .............................................................................................................II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................III CHAPTER 1: VANUATU AND THE CCA PROCESS ..........................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.2 CCA OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................1 1.3 THE PROCESS ..................................................................................................1 1.4 SELECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Regional Energy Assessment 2004
    Pacific Islands Renewable SPREP Energy Project A climate change partnership of GEF, UNDP, SPREP and the Pacific Islands Pacific Regional Energy Assessment U N 2004 DP An Assessment of the Key Energy Issues, Barriers to the Development of Renewable Energy to Mitigate Climate Change, and Capacity Development Needs for Removing the Barriers VANUATU National Report Volume 16 PIREP The Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme The Secretariat of the Pacific our islands, our lives… SPREP IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Johnston, Peter Pacific Regional Energy Assessment 2004 : an assessment of the key energy issues, barriers to the development of renewable energy to mitigate climate change, and capacity development needs to removing the barriers : Vanuatu National Report / Peter Johnston; John Vos. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 2005. xvi, 75 p. : figs., tables ; 29 cm. – (Pacific Islands Renewable Energy Project. Technical report ; no.16) “This report is based on data gathered by a PIREP team consisting of Ruben Bakeo, Anare Matakiviti, John Vos and Peter Johnston”. ISBN: 982-04-0301-4 1. Energy development – Vanuatu. 2. Energy sources, Renewable – Vanuatu. 3. Energy research – Vanuatu 4. Conservation of energy resources – Vanuatu. 5. Conservation of natural resources – Vanuatu. 6.Energy consumption - Climate factors – Vanuatu. I. Bakeo, Ruben. II. Matakiviti, Anare. III. Vos, John. IV. Pacific Islands Renewable Energy Project (PIREP). V. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme - (SPREP). VI. Title. VII. Series. 333.794159595 Currency Equivalent: US$ 1.00 = Vatu (Vt) 110 in March 2004 (but highly variable around the time) Fiscal Year: 1 January – 31 December Time Zone: GMT/UTC +11 hours This report is based on data gathered by a PIREP team consisting of: Mr Ruben Bakeo National PIREP Coordinator Mr Anare Matakiviti SOPAC Energy Adviser / National PIREP Consultant Mr Peter Johnston International PIREP Consultant; and Mr John Vos International PIREP Consultant The consultants visited Vanuatu in January and early February 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Locations of Tropical Cyclogenesis and Decay in the South Pacific Over the Period of Satellite Record Cyclone Zoe, December 2002 Minimum Pressure: 890 Hpa
    James P. Terry Geography Department National University of Singapore Gennady Gienko Division of Geography The University of the South Pacific Locations of tropical cyclogenesis and decay in the South Pacific over the period of satellite record Cyclone Zoe, December 2002 minimum pressure: 890 hPa Niue hospital Cyclone Heta, January 2004 Lau Islands, Fiji Cyclone Ami, January 2003 Intense rainfall and river flood responses Ngalimbiu River, Honiara, Solomon Islands Wave damage Santo Island, Vanuatu Coral reef destruction 1-week post-Cyclone Kina 1993 Ovalau Island Fiji Nukunonu Atoll, Tokelau Cyclone Percy, 2005 Storm surge Beach erosion Beachrock exposure Rampart formation, subsequent migration and island nourishment Funafuti Atoll Tuvalu Regional Specialized Meteorological Centre, Nadi Equator Cyclogenesis: Often embedded within existing low pressure areas e.g. the South Pacific Convergence Zone Four stages in typical lifespan Abbreviated life cycle of Cyclone Paula, April 2000 1. Formative stage: 11 April 2. Immature stage: 14 April 3. Mature stage (920 hPa): 15 April 4. Decay stage: 20 April Plotting storm tracks 6-hourly fixes indicate direction and speed Problems Defining cyclone phase within storm lifespan Bias in defining end of tracks Effects of improved tracking technology Filtering Australian storms Matching FMS and NZMS data 1990s End of tracks? Cyclone Tracks 1990's Sin 1.009388 - 1.080000 1.080001 - 2.200000 2.200001 - 20.000000 Analysis of cyclogenesis positions and track shapes Cyclone distribution and El Niño effects
    [Show full text]
  • [ 2001 ] Part 3 Chapter 3 Humanitarian and Special Economic Assistance
    Humanitarian and special economic assistance 823 Chapter III Economic and social questions Humanitarian and special economic assistance In 2001, the United Nations, through the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian assistance (OCHA), continued to coordinate the response of humanitarian agencies, particularly those of the UN system, to alleviate human suffering in disas- Coordination ters and emergencies, promote preparedness and prevention, and facilitate sustainable solutions. The 2001 consolidated inter-agency appeals pro- Humanitarian affairs segment cess was launched globally under the theme of the Economic and Social Council “Women and war”. During the year, appeals were During the humanitarian affairs segment of launched for Angola, Burundi, the northern Cau- the Economic and Social Council, held from 11 casus,theCongo,theDemocraticPeople’sRepub- to 13 July with the theme “Strengthening the lic of Korea, the Democratic Republic of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assist- Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, the Great Lakes region ance of the United Nations” (decision 2001/206 and Central Africa, the Maluku islandsofIndone- of 31 January), the Council held panel discus- sia,SierraLeone,Somalia,South-Eastern Europe, sions on emergency humanitarian assistance for the Sudan, Tajikistan, Uganda, the United Re- groups with special needs and on natural disaster public of Tanzania and West Africa. The total preparedness and response measures (decision sought amounted to $2,559 million, of which 2001/225 of 2 July). $1,415million was received, meeting 55.3 per cent The Council had before it a June report of of requirements. In addition, an inter-agency ap- the Secretary-General [A/56/95-E/2001/85] on peal covering Afghanistan for 2001, which sought strengthening the coordination of UN emer- $332.6 million, received contributions of $150 gency humanitarian assistance, submitted pur- million, or 45.1 per cent of requirements.
    [Show full text]