DOCSLIB.ORG

Powerpoint Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Powerpoint Template Accellera Overview February 27, 2017 Lu Dai | Accellera Chairman Welcome Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 2 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative Our Mission To provide a platform in which the electronics industry can collaborate to innovate and deliver global standards that improve design and verification productivity for electronics products. 3 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Broad Industry Support Corporate Members 4 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Broad Industry Support Associate Members 5 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Global Presence SystemC Evolution Day DVCon Europe DVCon U.S. SystemC Japan Design Automation Conference DVCon China Verification & ESL Forum DVCon India 6 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 7 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Accellera News . Standards - IEEE Approves UVM 1.2 as IEEE 1800.2-2017 - Accellera relicenses SystemC reference implementation under Apache 2.0 . Outreach - First DVCon China to be held April 19, 2017 - Get IEEE free standards program extended 10 years/10 standards . Awards - Thomas Alsop receives 2017 Technical Excellence Award for his leadership of the UVM Working Group - Shrenik Mehta receives 2016 Accellera Leadership Award for his role as Accellera chair from 2005-2010 8 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 DVCon – Global Presence 29th Annual DVCon U.S. 4th Annual DVCon Europe www.dvcon-us.org 4th Annual DVCon India www.dvcon-europe.org 1st DVCon China www.dvcon-india.org www.dvcon-china.org 9 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 10 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative Board of Directors Promotions Committee Technical Committee Administration SystemVerilog- SystemC Interface OVL IP-XACT SystemC AMS AMS Language Schema WG SC/TLM Evolution SystemC Multi Language IP Tagging UVM Synthesis SC Datatypes Registers OCP SystemRDL UCIS SystemC TLM SystemC CCI Extensions SystemC Portable User Group Stimulus Verification Supported IEEE Working Groups Compliance 1076 1801 1685 VHDL UPF IP-XACT 1800 1666 SystemVerilog SystemC 1800.2 1666.1 UVM SystemC AMS 11 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Ongoing Technical Activities Current Standards and Activities • Open Verification Library (OVL) 2.8.1 • Verilog-AMS (V-AMS) 2.4 • Standard Co-Emulation Modeling Interface (SCE-MI) 2.3 • Unified Coverage Interoperability Standard (UCIS) 1.0 • IP-XACT - Update of IEEE 1685 Issues and Vendor Extensions • Intellectual Property (IP) Tagging 1.0 • Multi-Language (ongoing) • Portable Stimulus (ongoing) • SystemVerilog-AMS (ongoing) • SystemC Synthesis 1.4.7 • SystemC Analog Mixed-Signal (AMS) 2.0 • SystemC LRM and Examples 2.3.1 (includes TLM 2.0) • SystemRDL 1.0 • Open Source Companions: - UVM Reference Implementation 1.2 - SystemC Proof of Concept Library 2.3.1 - SystemC Verification Library (SCV) 2.0 - UVM-SystemC 1.0-alpha version 12 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 13 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Strong Partnership with IEEE . IEEE Get program allows access to EDA & IP standards worldwide . Download for free - 1666 SystemC - 1666.1 SystemC AMS - 1685 IP-XACT - 1800 SystemVerilog - 1800.2 UVM coming soon! - 1801 UPF . Ongoing collaboration with the IEEE Standards Association - 1666 SystemC Language - 1666.1 SystemC Analog Mixed-Signal (AMS) - 1685 IP-XACT - 1800 SystemVerilog - 1800.2 Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) - 1801 Unified Power Format (UPF) - 1850 Property Specification Language (PSL) 14 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 15 5000 . IEEE Standards Access at at Access No Charge Standards IEEE 0 More than than More Accellerawill release AccellerarelationshipIEEE thewith Get IEEE program 1495 4429 66919474 13885 884310500 1967 83,000 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. Initiative, © Systems Accellera 2017 1025416864 422917682 1037817094 441018259 1049517304 downloads 460618766 1062117567 480619462 17750 10 10745 Downloads Cumulative http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/ 503420091 17916 1085920711 standards 1666 5217 18170 10970 date! to 5441 21320 18383 1685 11079 5636 22073 1117418548 5820 22779 1800 1130318792 5997 23583 for - 18998 SA 1143524360 1801 6238 1155919190 10 6409 24967 1735 19371 years 11665 2010 6553 25538 1181219585 6777 26115 February 1666.1 - 1196519765 2017 6997 26746 under an extended 1210319941 7220 27521 2017 55 20147 12256 28604 7550152 20338 12383 29585 7783292 1251020530 8013 30601 272598 20712 12626 31422 8243656 354 20844 12752 32270 8470710 421 21003 12873 33123 8715750 499 21122 12994 33963 8892805 549 1312021273 9115 34761 599855 1320721403 9262 37191 713894 21515 13317 37879 9461942 763 Advancing Standards Together . Share your experiences - Visit www.accellera.org and register to post on forums at forums.accellera.org . Show your support - Record your adoption of standards . Become an Accellera member - Join working groups 16 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 THANK YOU Download a copy of this presentation at www.accellera.org/about Thank you to our Global Sponsors 17 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prostep Ivip CPO Statement Template
    CPO Statement of Mentor Graphics For Questa SIM Date: 17 June, 2015 CPO Statement of Mentor Graphics Following the prerequisites of ProSTEP iViP’s Code of PLM Openness (CPO) IT vendors shall determine and provide a list of their relevant products and the degree of fulfillment as a “CPO Statement” (cf. CPO Chapter 2.8). This CPO Statement refers to: Product Name Questa SIM Product Version Version 10 Contact Ellie Burns [email protected] This CPO Statement was created and published by Mentor Graphics in form of a self-assessment with regard to the CPO. Publication Date of this CPO Statement: 17 June 2015 Content 1 Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Details of Self-Assessment ________________________________________________________________________ 3 2.1 CPO Chapter 2.1: Interoperability ________________________________________________________________ 3 2.2 CPO Chapter 2.2: Infrastructure _________________________________________________________________ 4 2.3 CPO Chapter 2.5: Standards ____________________________________________________________________ 4 2.4 CPO Chapter 2.6: Architecture __________________________________________________________________ 5 2.5 CPO Chapter 2.7: Partnership ___________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.1 Data Generated by Users ___________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.2 Partnership Models _______________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.3 Support of
    [Show full text]
  • Power Reduction of a CMOS High-Speed Interface Using Power Gating
    FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Power reduction of a CMOS high-speed interface using power gating Luís Miguel Granja Gomes FOR JURY EVALUATION Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Eletrotécnica e de Computadores FEUP Supervisor: Prof. João Canas Ferreira Synopsys Supervisor: Engineer Hélder Araújo June 25, 2013 c Luís Gomes, 2013 Resumo A indústria de circuitos VLSI sofreu uma série de revoluções na forma como os chips eletrónicos são projetados. Começou com o uso de linguagens de descrição de hardware e de avançadas ferramentas de trabalho, com o objetivo de diminuir os tempos de projeto e de produção, ao mesmo tempo que circuitos mais rápidos e pequenos eram construídos. A produção de dispos- itivos eletrónicos aumentou significativamente, de tal modo que, hoje, são usados biliões todos os dias. Atualmente, o maior desafio não é só projetar circuitos integrados mais pequenos e rápidos, mas manter esses acréscimos de velocidade e diminuição de tamanho, reduzindo simultaneamente o consumo de potência. Com a diminuição do tamanho da tecnologia e o uso de transístores com tensões de threshold cada vez mais reduzidas, o consumo de potência dinâmica e estática atingiu níveis insuportáveis. Chegou-se a um ponto em que, tanto económica como ambientalmente fa- lando, é obrigatório projetar para reduzir a potência. Synopsys, uma das maiores empresas desta indústria, apresentou um projeto com o objetivo de implementar Power Gating numa das suas interfaces de alta velocidade, como técnica mais eficaz na redução da potência estática. Esta dissertação apresenta as adaptações necessárias para a implementação de Power Gating us- ando ferramentas Synopsys, aplicando-as a um caso de estudo complexo.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Simulation Between Cλash and Traditional Hdls
    MASTER THESIS CO-SIMULATION BETWEEN CλASH AND TRADITIONAL HDLS Author: John Verheij Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS) Computer Architecture for Embedded Systems (CAES) Exam committee: Dr. Ir. C.P.R. Baaij Dr. Ir. J. Kuper Dr. Ir. J.F. Broenink Ir. E. Molenkamp August 19, 2016 Abstract CλaSH is a functional hardware description language (HDL) developed at the CAES group of the University of Twente. CλaSH borrows both the syntax and semantics from the general-purpose functional programming language Haskell, meaning that circuit de- signers can define their circuits with regular Haskell syntax. CλaSH contains a compiler for compiling circuits to traditional hardware description languages, like VHDL, Verilog, and SystemVerilog. Currently, compiling to traditional HDLs is one-way, meaning that CλaSH has no simulation options with the traditional HDLs. Co-simulation could be used to simulate designs which are defined in multiple lan- guages. With co-simulation it should be possible to use CλaSH as a verification language (test-bench) for traditional HDLs. Furthermore, circuits defined in traditional HDLs, can be used and simulated within CλaSH. In this thesis, research is done on the co-simulation of CλaSH and traditional HDLs. Traditional hardware description languages are standardized and include an interface to communicate with foreign languages. This interface can be used to include foreign func- tions, or to make verification and co-simulation possible. Because CλaSH also has possibilities to communicate with foreign languages, through Haskell foreign function interface (FFI), it is possible to set up co-simulation. The Verilog Procedural Interface (VPI), as defined in the IEEE 1364 standard, is used to set-up the communication and to control a Verilog simulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Systemc Modules from HDL for System-On-Chip Applications
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2004 Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications Siddhartha Devalapalli University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Devalapalli, Siddhartha, "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2119 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Siddhartha Devalapalli entitled "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Electrical Engineering. Dr. Donald W. Bouldin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Dr. Gregory D. Peterson, Dr. Chandra Tan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Siddhartha Devalapalli entitled "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications".
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Emulation of Systemc
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Emulation of SystemC Applications for Portable FPGA Binaries A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science by Scott Spencer Sirowy June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Frank Vahid, Chairperson Dr. Tony Givargis Dr. Sheldon X.-D. Tan Copyright by Scott Spencer Sirowy 2010 The Dissertation of Scott Spencer Sirowy is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Emulation of SystemC Applications for Portable FPGA Binaries by Scott Spencer Sirowy Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Computer Science University of California, Riverside, June 2010 Dr. Frank Vahid, Chairperson As FPGAs become more common in mainstream general-purpose computing platforms, capturing and distributing high-performance implementations of applications on FPGAs will become increasingly important. Even in the presence of C-based synthesis tools for FPGAs, designers continue to implement applications as circuits, due in large part to allow for capture of clever spatial, circuit-level implementation features leading to superior performance and efficiency. We demonstrate the feasibility of a spatial form of FPGA application capture that offers portability advantages for FPGA applications unseen with current FPGA binary formats. We demonstrate the portability of such a distribution by developing a fast on-chip emulation framework that performs transparent optimizations, allowing spatially-captured FPGA applications to immediately run on FPGA platforms without costly and hard-to-use synthesis/mapping tool flows, and sometimes faster than PC-based execution. We develop several dynamic and transparent optimization techniques, including just-in-time compilation , bytecode acceleration , and just-in-time synthesis that take advantage of a platform’s available resources, resulting in iv orders of magnitude performance improvement over normal emulation techniques and PC-based execution.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE-SA and How Standardization Can Enhance Your Business and Career Case Study in Electronic Design Automation
    IEEE-SA and How Standardization Can Enhance Your Business and Career Case Study in Electronic Design Automation Yatin Trivedi Member, Board of Governors, IEEE-SA Member, Standards Board, IEEE-SA Member, Education Activities Board, IEEE Director of Standards and Interoperability, Synopsys Vienna, March 2015 Contents Standards and EDA Impact of EDA standards Case Study: Successful Standards Standards as Innovation Platform Standards, Business and Career © 2015 IEEE Standards Association Vienna, March 2015 2 1 IEEE Technical Societies/Councils Top-class technical expert base . Aerospace & Electronic Systems . Instrumentation & Measurement . Antennas & Propagation . Lasers & Electro-Optics . Broadcast Technology . Magnetics . Circuits & Systems . Microwave Theory & Techniques . Communications . Nanotechnology Council . Components, Packaging, & Manufacturing . Nuclear & Plasma Sciences Technology . Oceanic Engineering Computer . Power Electronics Computational Intelligence . Power & Energy Consumer Electronics . Product Safety Engineering Control Systems . Professional Communication Council on Electronic Design Automation . Reliability Council on Superconductivity . Robotics & Automation Dielectrics & Electrical Insulation . Sensors Council Education . Signal Processing Electromagnetic Compatibility . Social Implications of Technology Electron Devices . Solid-State Circuits . Engineering in Medicine & Biology . Systems Council . Geosciences & Remote Sensing . Systems, Man, & Cybernetics . Industrial Electronics . Technology Management Council
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 10, Issue 1 — March 2014
    A PUBLICATION OF MENTOR GRAPHICS — VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 — MARCH 2014 WHAT’S ON Whether It’s Fixing a Boiler, or Getting THE HORIZON? to Tapeout, It’s Productivity that Matters. By Tom Fitzpatrick, Editor and Verification Technologist The Little Things that Can Make Verification Easier Make verification more As I write this, we’re experiencing yet another winter storm here in New England. It started this productive by keeping your focus on verifying your design’s functionality...page 4 morning, and the timing was fortuitous since my wife had scheduled a maintenance visit by the oil company to fix a minor problem with the pipes before it really started snowing heavily. While the kids were sleeping in due to school being cancelled, the plumber worked in our basement to make The advantages of using the Unified Power Format (UPF) sure everything was working well. It turned out that he had to replace the water feeder valve on the standard with Questa See how Questa was able to model the behaviors boiler, which was preventing enough water from circulating in the heating pipes. Aside from being from their UPF specification...page 8 inefficient, this also caused the pipes to make a gurgling sound, which was the key symptom that led to the service call in the first place. As I see the snow piling Pre-silicon validation of IEEE 1149.1-2013 based Silicon up outside my window (6-8 inches and counting), it’s easy to Instruments Verify the functionality picture the disaster that this could have become had we not of the actual chip through what Intellitech calls “silicon instruments.”...page 13 identified the problem early and gotten it fixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware Description Languages Compared: Verilog and Systemc
    Hardware Description Languages Compared: Verilog and SystemC Gianfranco Bonanome Columbia University Department of Computer Science New York, NY Abstract This library encompasses all of the necessary components required to transform C++ into a As the complexity of modern digital systems hardware description language. Such additions increases, engineers are now more than ever include constructs for concurrency, time notion, integrating component modeling by means of communication, reactivity and hardware data hardware description languages (HDLs) in the types. design process. The recent addition of SystemC to As described by Edwards [1], VLSI an already competitive arena of HDLs dominated verification involves an initial simulation done in by Verilog and VHDL, calls for a direct C or C++, usually for proof of concept purposes, comparison to expose potential advantages and followed by translation into an HDL, simulation of flaws of this newcomer. This paper presents such the model, applying appropriate corrections, differences and similarities, specifically between hardware synthesization and further iterative Verilog and SystemC, in effort to better categorize refinement. SystemC is able to shorten this the scopes of the two languages. Results are based process by combining the first two steps. on simulation conducted in both languages, for a Consequently, this also decreases time to market model with equal specifications. for a manufacturer. Generally a comparison between two computer languages is based on the number of Introduction lines of code and execution time required to achieve a specific task, using the two languages. A Continuous advances in circuit fabrication number of additional parameters can be observed, technology have augmented chip density, such as features, existence or absence of constructs consequently increasing device complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Operating System Modelling and Simulation Using Systemc
    Real-Time Operating System Modelling and Simulation Using SystemC Ke Yu Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Computer Science June 2010 Abstract Increasing system complexity and stringent time-to-market pressure bring chal- lenges to the design productivity of real-time embedded systems. Various System- Level Design (SLD), System-Level Design Languages (SLDL) and Transaction- Level Modelling (TLM) approaches have been proposed as enabling tools for real-time embedded system specification, simulation, implementation and verifi- cation. SLDL-based Real-Time Operating System (RTOS) modelling and simula- tion are key methods to understand dynamic scheduling and timing issues in real- time software behavioural simulation during SLD. However, current SLDL-based RTOS simulation approaches do not support real-time software simulation ade- quately in terms of both functionality and accuracy, e.g., simplistic RTOS func- tionality or annotation-dependent software time advance. This thesis is concerned with SystemC-based behavioural modelling and simu- lation of real-time embedded software, focusing upon RTOSs. The RTOS-centric simulation approach can support flexible, fast and accurate real-time software tim- ing and functional simulation. They can help software designers to undertake real- time software prototyping at early design phases. The contributions in this thesis are fourfold. Firstly, we propose a mixed timing real-time software modelling and simula- tion approach with various timing related techniques, which are suitable for early software modelling and simulation. We show that this approach not only avoids the accuracy drawback in some existing methods but also maintains a high simu- lation performance. Secondly, we propose a Live CPU Model to assist software behavioural timing modelling and simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Validation of Low Power Format Using Standard Cell Library Santosh K
    Validation of Low Power Format using Standard Cell Library Santosh K. Anchatgeri1, Padmanaban K.2, Sachin Bapat3 1- M.Sc. [Engg.] Student, 2-Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, M. S. Ramaiah School of Advanced Studies, Bangalore- 560 058 3- Staff Manager, VLSI System Design Centre, QUALCOMM, Bangalore. Abstract Increased system complexity has led to the substitution of the traditional bottom-up design flow by systematic hierarchical design flow. With decreasing channel lengths, few key problems such as timing closure, design sign-off, routing complexity, and power dissipation arise in the design flows. Specifically, minimizing power dissipation is critical in several high-end processors. This research aims at optimizing the design flow for power using the unified power format (UPF). The low power reduction techniques enforced in this research are multivoltage, multi-threshold voltage (Vth), and power gating with state retention. A top-down digital design flow for a flash based mixed signal microcontroller has been implemented with and without UPF synthesis flow for 45nm technology. The UPF synthesis is implemented with two voltages, 1.2V and 0.9V (Multi- VDD). Area, power and timing metrics are analyzed for the flows developed. Power savings of about 20 % are achieved in the design flow with 'multi-threshold' power technique compared to that of the design flow with no low power techniques employed. Similarly, 31 % power savings are achieved in the design flow with the UPF implemented when compared to that of the design flow with 'multi-threshold' power technique employed. Thus, a cumulative power savings of 51% has been achieved in a complete power efficient design flow (UPF) compared to that of the generic top-down standard flow with no power saving techniques employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Systemc Models with Verilog Using the Systemverilog
    Integrating SystemC Models with Verilog and SystemVerilog Models Using the SystemVerilog Direct Programming Interface Stuart Sutherland Sutherland HDL, Inc. [email protected] ABSTRACT The Verilog Programming Language Interface (PLI) provides a mechanism for Verilog simulators to invoke C programs. One of the primary applications of the Verilog PLI is to integrate C- language and SystemC models into Verilog simulations. But, Verilog's PLI is a complex interface that can be daunting to learn, and often slows down simulation performance. SystemVerilog includes a new generation of a Verilog to C interface, called the “Direct Programming Interface” or “DPI”. The DPI replaces the complex Verilog PLI with a simple and straight forward import/ export methodology. • How does the SystemVerilog DPI work, and is it really easier to use than the Verilog PLI? • Can the SystemVerilog DPI replace the Verilog PLI for integrating C and SystemC models with Verilog models? • Is the SystemVerilog DPI more efficient (for faster simulations) that the Verilog PLI? • Is there anything the SystemVerilog DPI cannot do that the Verilog PLI can? This paper addresses all of these questions. The paper shows that if specific guidelines are followed, the SystemVerilog DPI does indeed simplify integrating SystemC models with Verilog models. Table of Contents 1.0 What is SystemVerilog? ........................................................................................................2 2.0 Why integrate SystemC models with Verilog models? .........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • A Mixed Language Fault Simulation of VHDL and Systemc
    A Mixed Language Fault Simulation of VHDL and SystemC Silvio Misera, Heinrich Theodor Vierhaus, Lars Breitenfeld, André Sieber Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Computer Engineering Department <sm, htv, lars.breitenfeld, [email protected]> Abstract instead, which typically have only a limited capability to handle effective and realistic fault models [7, 10]. Fault simulation technology is essential key not This is the reason why we implemented FIT [1] as a only to the validation of test patterns for ICs and SoCs, hierarchical fault simulation environment, which uses a but also to the analysis of system behavior under fault mixture of structural VHDL model at the gate level transient and intermittent faults. For this purpose, we and C++-models for large-size macros. Furthermore, developed a hierarchical fault simulation environment FIT supports non-trivial fault models such as single- that uses structural VHDL models at the gate level, but event upsets (SEUs). is able to model embedded blocks in C++. With While C++ is relatively effective in some cases, it SystemC becoming a de-facto standard in high-level cannot handle typical properties of hardware such as modeling, a simulation approach had to be developed concurrency. SystemC [3] has recently emerged as a which makes effective use of SystemC technology by C++-compatible extension, which is able to model encapsulating such “threads” into the fault simulation such effects. For a real system-level fault simulation, environment. Furthermore, it can be shown that concurrency becomes a must. Therefore the SystemC allows the modeling of complex transistor- compatibility of SystemC concepts and structures with level structures, for which equivalent gate-level the basic approach followed with FIT had to be representations are not adequate.
    [Show full text]