Noxious Weeds of Nebraska Biology Identification Distribution Control

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Noxious Weeds of Nebraska Biology Identification Distribution Control University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension EC176 (Revised March 2012) Noxious Weeds of Nebraska MuskMusk Fred Roeth, Emeritus Extension WeedsThistle Specialist Steve Melvin, former Extension Educator,Thistle Frontier County Irvin Schleufer, Agricultural Research Technician Mark Bernards, Extension Weeds Specialist Biology Identification Distribution Control Biology Musk lthough classified as a biennial plant ThistleThistle A(see Life Cycle, page 5), opportunistic might be a better descriptor because usk thistle (Carduus nutans L.) is an compete with native vegetation. musk thistle can behave as an annual or a introduced invasive broadleaf weed Musk thistles can invade all lands in M winter annual depending on the growing native to Europe, North Africa, and Nebraska. Typical cropland weed con- conditions. Musk thistle seedlings can Asia. In these areas it is a minor weed trol methods are very effective against emerge anytime during the growing sea- because natural enemies keep its popula- them; however, land with permanent son. Germination is strongly enhanced tion low. When the plant was introduced cover (pasture, range, roadway ditches, by light. Optimum germination occurs in into North America, its natural enemies and wasteland) that is not managed to moist soils at 59° to 68° F in light and 68° were left behind. Without these natural prevent bare ground is more likely to to 86° F in the dark. Probably the most checks, the thistle is able to thrive and develop a serious infestation. common life cycle is for musk thistle to • In pasture and rangelands germinate in the summer, overwinter as thistles compete for the mois- a rosette, and begin bolting (seed stalk ture, sunlight, and nutrients production) about May 1. A musk thistle needed to produce forage for rosette is a cluster of leaves in circular livestock. Musk thistle is not form that grows flat on the ground a poisonous plant; however, without an upright stem (Figure 2). A livestock will refuse to enter bolted plant is one that has developed an heavily infested areas and will upright stem (Figure 3). not graze close to the spiny Blooming starts with the terminal plants (Figure 1). head at the top of the plant about the first • On roadways and wastelands week in June and progresses to the lower musk thistle does not provide branches over six to eight weeks.Musk sufficient protection against thistle is a prolific seed producer. Large, soil erosion, crowds out desir- extensively branched plants in sparse able vegetation, is unsightly, stands may have 100 or more heads with hinders movement of people a total production of about 20,000 seeds. and wildlife, and produces The main terminal heads on the upper seed that infests surrounding branches bear the bulk of the plump, areas. well-filled seeds. Individual terminal Figure 1. Dense patch of musk thistle. heads can have as many as 1,500 seeds, each a little over 1/8 inch long (Figure 4). Seed germination may run as high as 95 History percent shortly after dissemination and most germinate in the first year; none- arly American records are scarce and give little clue as to when and where musk thistle first theless, some will remain viable for more Ebecame established on this continent. The earliest known collections were made from 1852 to than 10 years in the soil. 1869 by T. C. Porter near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Seeds are dispersed by wind, small mammals, birds, and water. A field study Musk thistle, also known as nodding thistle, is now naturalized throughout most of the United on the effects of wind speed on musk States and southern Canada. It occurs from Nova Scotia west to British Columbia, south to California, thistle seed dispersal showed that seed and east to Georgia. attached to pappus can travel up to 330 feet at wind speeds of 12 miles per hour In Nebraska, musk thistle was not found in extensive plant collections made during the late (Figure 5). A computer model based on 1920s and 1930s; however, in 1932 a specimen was brought to a field day in Seward County for this field trial indicates that less than 1 identification. It was recorded near Dawson in Richardson County during a 1940-41 botanical survey. percent of musk thistle seeds are blown more than 330 feet, and more than 80 These scattered reports, references, and collections indicate that sometime between 1945 and 1950 percent of seeds are deposited less than musk thistle emerged as a weed species of economic importance in Nebraska. By 1959 it was such 130 feet from the release point. Less than a pest in eastern Nebraska pastures and waste areas that the Nebraska Legislature declared musk five percent of seed remains attached to the pappus when it breaks from the 2 thistle a noxious weed and required all landowners to prevent seed production on their lands. flower head so most thistle pappus float- ing in the wind do not bear seed. Identification eaves of both rosettes and bolted plants L are deeply cut (segmented) and dark green with a light green midrib. There is a grayish-green area at the outer edge of each spine-tipped leaf segment (Figure 6). Each lobe has three to five points that end in a white or yellowish spine. The leaves extend onto the stem, giving it a winged or frilled appearance. The leaves and stem are relatively free of hair. Seedlings emerge with two cotyledon leaves, then add other Figure 2. Musk thistle rosettes can smother other vegetation. Figure 3. Musk thistle in early bolting stage. leaves one leaf at a time to develop into a rosette that can reach over 2 feet in diam- eter. Mature plant heights are typically 5 to 7 feet with a long, fleshy taproot. Musk thistle has deep reddish purple flowers that are large (up to 3 inches in diameter) and attractive. The head is sol- itary on the end of the stem and nods or hangs down as it grows in size (Figure 7). A close relative, the plumeless thistle (Carduus acanthoides L.), is also found in Nebraska. The general appearance of plu- meless thistle is similar to musk thistle (Figure 8). The distinguishing character- istics are that plumeless thistle heads are smaller and plumeless leaves are more deeply cut with sparsely to noticeably Figure 4. Musk thistle seeds are light tan. One Figure 5. Musk thistle seeds are dispersed by windblown hairy areas, particularly along the leaf plant produces 10,000 to 20,000 seeds. pappus. veins and stems (Figure 6). Figure 6. Leaves of musk thistle (left) Figure 8. Plumeless thistle (left) and musk thistle (right) in early and plumeless thistle (right). Musk thistle bloom. Note the nodding heads of musk thistle. leaves have a light green midrib, are Figure 7. Musk thistle flower heads are pink to grayish green on the outer edge, and are purple and showy. relatively free of hair. 3 production is increased. Cultural control only when needed and at rates based on methods include: soil tests so the fertilizer is used by the Control Methods • maintaining desirable plants that are desired plants in late spring and sum- usk thistle will be a part of Nebraska’s vigorous and competitive; mer. Most musk thistle germinate in the Mflora for the foreseeable future and • preventing seed from getting into the late summer and fall, so avoiding higher will continue to infest areas that are not area; soil fertility during this time of year will managed to prevent invasion. • maintaining a good soil fertility reduce growth. A management plan should include program; Multispecies grazing works well to a combination of cultural, mechani- control many of the plants that cattle do • using controlled multispecies grazing cal, chemical, and biological control not like to eat. Some producers claim (grazing with cattle, sheep, goats, etc.), methods. Its primary goals should be to that goats, horses, and donkeys will graze and conducting prescribed burns. discourage establishment by encourag- on musk thistles; however, no research is ing vigorous competition of the desirable A vigorous, thick perennial plant available to confirm these claims. species and to prevent seed production community is a difficult place for musk Prescribed burning does not directly by existing plants. Most pasture weeds thistle seedlings to establish. A well man- control musk thistle but can make other gain their foothold because the desirable aged pasture produces more forage and control methods more effective. It is species are overgrazed. County Weed competes vigorously with the few weeds important to burn at the proper time to Control Authorities enforce the Noxious that do get established. Researchers have promote vigorous grass growth and to Weed Law through survey, notification, found that musk thistle growing in an apply a herbicide about 10 to 14 days after and supervision of control efforts. Most area where surrounding vegetation had the thistles have recovered and are grow- thistles growing in a pasture likely origi- been removed produced 10 times as ing well. Prescribed burning may stimulate nated from seed produced nearby. many flowering heads and grew almost new grass seedlings and tillers which can twice as tall as thistles in an average thicken the grass and increase competition Cultural pasture. The backbone of a good control against musk thistle in future years. Cultural controls often provide a program is encouraging vigorous growth win-win situation for the land man- of desirable plants. Mechanical Excess soil fertility can aid musk this- ager and livestock: musk thistle and Mechanical control such as hand dig- tle seedling establishment. Use fertilizer other weeds are controlled and forage ging, cutting heads, mowing, or shred- ding is effective after the musk thistle has reached the bud or bloom stage.
Recommended publications
  • Classical Biological Control of Nodding and Plumeless Thistles
    Biological Control 21, 206–213 (2001) doi:10.1006/bcon.2001.0940, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Classical Biological Control of Nodding and Plumeless Thistles L. T. Kok Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0319 Received March 15, 2001; accepted March 20, 2001; published online May 22, 2001 group. Both thistles are winter annuals or biennials. Nodding (musk) thistle (Carduus thoermeri Wein- Seeds produced in summer form rosettes which over- mann in the Carduus nutans L. group) and plumeless winter. The rosettes resume development in spring, thistle (Carduus acanthoides L.) are introduced nox- followed by stem elongation and flowering. Nodding ious weeds of Eurasian origin. Both weeds are prob- thistle was first recorded in 1853 at Harrisburg, Penn- lematic in pastures, rangelands, and croplands and sylvania (Stuckey and Forsyth, 1971) and has been along state highways in many parts of the United reported in 40 of the 48 contiguous states (Frick, 1978). States. The success of both species of thistles is largely Plumeless thistle first appeared in 1878 at Camden, due to their prolific seed production, seed longevity, New Jersey and in Ohio (Batra, 1978) and is found in competitive ability, and lack of natural enemies. Clas- sical biological control of nodding thistle in Virginia 19 states (Frick, 1978). The two thistle species often has been achieved with three exotic thistle herbivores, occupy the same habitats in the northeast, such as Rhinocyllus conicus Froelich (Coleoptera: Curculion- overgrazed pastures and disturbed roadsides, some- idae), Trichosirocalus horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: times occurring in mixed stands (Batra, 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • WENTLOOGE LEVEL INVERTEBRATE SURVEY, 2019 David Boyce
    WENTLOOGE LEVEL INVERTEBRATE SURVEY, 2019 David Boyce DC Boyce Ecologist October 2019 1. INTRODUCTION This report details the findings of an invertebrate survey carried out under contract to Green Ecology. The survey aims to assess the importance for invertebrates of the area of Wentlooge Level shown on Figure 2.1 below. The site is in Wales, on the Gwent Levels; an extensive area of grazing marsh on the north-western side of the Bristol Channel. Wentlooge Level lies in the western part of this area, between the cities of Cardiff to the west and Newport to the east. A central grid reference for the site approximates to ST276817. The grazing marsh ditches of the Gwent Levels support a nationally important assemblage of aquatic plants and invertebrates. It also has one of the last remaining UK populations of the threatened shrill carder bumblebee Bombus sylvarum. For these reasons, much of the area is notified as a series of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). The whole of the Wentlooge Level site lies within the Gwent Levels – St. Brides SSSI. Both the shrill carder bumblebee and the brown-banded carder bumblebee Bombus humilis, which also has a strong population on the Gwent Levels, are additionally listed in Section 7 of the Environment (Wales) Act 2016 as Species of Principal Importance for the conservation of biodiversity in Wales. 2. METHODS The first phase of survey work was undertaken in two blocks of two days, the first session being carried out on the 1st and 2nd of May 2019 and the second on the 22nd and 23rd May.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit List
    EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 1 of 163 No Exhibit Name Page 1 A728 Exhibits List.pdf (A728) 3 2 A729 Exhibit 1 route map google.pdf (A729) 4 3 A730 Exhibit 2 water environment water courses.pdf (A730) 5 4 A731 Exhibit 3 cultural heritage.pdf (A731) 6 - 7 5 A732 Exhibit 4 metropolitan Open Land.pdf (A732) 8 - 9 6 A733 Exhibit 5 dragonflies.pdf (A733) 10 - 15 7 A734 Exhibit 6 quality of water.pdf (A734) 16 8 A735 Exhibit 7 Customer activities.pdf (A735) 17 9 A736 Exhibit 8 pylons.pdf (A736) 18 - 24 10 A737 Exhibit 9 Species-List.pdf (A737) 25 - 84 11 A738 Exhibit 10 magic maps.pdf (A738) 85 - 86 12 A739 Exhibit 11 Leisure and tourism Destination.pdf (A739) 87 13 A740 Exhibit 12 continuity through time.pdf (A740) 88 - 91 14 A741 Exhibit 13 The Plans for Denham Country Park.pdf (A741) 92 - 93 15 A742 Exhibit 14 Enabling Works.pdf (A742) 94 - 95 16 A743 Exhibit 15 Water Framework Directive.pdf (A743) 96 - 97 17 A744 Exhibit 16 Ecological_baseline_data_Mammals.pdf (A744) 98 - 108 18 A745 Exhibit 17 Wetlands_Programmes of measures_170907.pdf (A745) 109 - 117 19 A746 Exhibit 18 Guidance_protection animal species.pdf (A746) 118 - 136 20 A747 Exhibit 19 ODPM Circular 06_2005.pdf (A747) 137 - 151 HOL/00521/0001 EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 2 of 163 No Exhibit
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Noxious Weeds in Oregon
    Biological Control of What is Biological Weed Control? DALMATIAN TOADFLAX GORSE Linaria dalmatica Ulex europaeus Invasive noxious weeds in Oregon cost millions of dollars It is important to make sure the correct species of biocontrol Key to Biocontrol Agent Status Noxious Weeds in Oregon in economic and environmental damage. Biological agents are released, to use the most effective species, and to Gorse seed weevil control is a tool vegetation managers employ to help The following general information is provided for each document the release and establishment of weed biocontrol Exapion ulicis naturally suppress weed infestations. This pamphlet agents. biocontrol agent. shows many of the common biological agents you may Year: 1956 Distribution: Widespread A guide to common biological Since 1947, 77 species of biocontrol agents have been released Year: Year of introduction. encounter in Oregon. Attack rate: Heavy Control: Good control agents found in Oregon in Oregon against 32 species of targeted weeds. A total of Distribution: Distribution of agent in host infested counties. Collectability: Mass Release No. 100 Classical biological control is the use of selected natural Dalmatian toadflax stem weevil 67 species are established. The majority of the bioagents Widespread >50% Limited <50% Timing: Apr–May Method: Sweep net/ enemies to control targeted weeds. Most of our worst are insects (71), plus three mites, one nematode, and two Mecinus janthiniformis racquet Stage: Adult Comment: No need for Attack rate: noxious weeds originated from other continents. pathogens. Successful projects can generate 15:1 benefit to Percent of plants attacked. Year: 2001 Distribution: Widespread redistribution. Prospective biocontrol agents are thoroughly tested to cost ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • See Possil Marsh Species List
    1 of 37 Possil Marsh Reserve 07/09/2020 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Tetranychidae 1913 1914 1 alga Cladophora glomerata 2017 2017 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2007 2019 3 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 1 amphibian Rana temporaria Common Frog 1966 2019 8 annelid Alboglossiphonia heteroclita 1959 1982 4 annelid Dina lineata 1972 1973 2 annelid Erpobdella octoculata leeches 1913 1914 1 annelid Glossiphonia complanata 1959 1961 2 annelid Haemopis sanguisuga horse leech 1913 1914 1 annelid Helobdella stagnalis 1959 1961 2 annelid Oligochaeta Aquatic Worm 1982 1982 1 annelid Theromyzon tessulatum duck leech 1959 1982 6 bacterium Pseudanabaena 2008 2008 1 bacterium Synechococcus 2008 2008 1 bird Acanthis flammea Common (Mealy) Redpoll 1879 1952 3 bird Acanthis flammea subsp. rostrata Greenland Redpoll 1913 1914 1 bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 1900 2019 8 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 1879 2020 19 bird Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper 1913 1930 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 1913 2020 13 bird Alauda arvensis Skylark 1913 2012 4 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 1863 2018 10 bird Anas acuta Pintail 1900 1981 4 bird Anas clypeata Shoveler 1913 2019 34 bird Anas crecca Teal 1913 2020 51 bird Anas penelope Wigeon 1913 2020 65 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 1913 2020 34 bird Anas querquedula Garganey 1900 1978 3 bird Anas strepera Gadwall 1982 2018 15 bird Anser albifrons White-fronted Goose 1900 1952 1 bird Anser anser Greylag Goose 1900 2012 5 bird Anthus pratensis
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List As of September 2014 Order Family
    Merrimac Farm WMA Insect List as of September 2014 Order Family Common Name Scientific Name Acari Ixodidae American Dog Tick Dermacentor variabilis Araneae Anyphaenidae Ghost Spider Hibana sp. Araneae Araneidae Larinia directa Larinia directa Araneae Araneidae Star-bellied Orbweaver Acanthepeira stellata Araneae Araneidae White Micrathena Micrathena mitrata Araneae Araneidae Spined Micrathena Micrathena gracilis Araneae Lycosidae Wolf Spider Hogna sp. Araneae Lycosidae Thin-legged Wolf Spider Pardosa sp. Araneae Lycosidae Rabid Wolf Spider Rabidosa rabida Araneae Oxyopidae Lynx Spider Oxyopes aglossus Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Pelegrina proterva? Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Phidippus princeps Araneae Salticidae Jumping Spider Tutellina elegans Araneae Salticidae Peppered Jumper Pelegrina galathea Araneae Thomisidae Northern Crab Spider Mecaphesa asperata Araneae Thomisidae Swift Crab Spider Mecaphesa celer Araneae Thomisidae White-banded Crab Spider Misumenoides formosipes Blattodea Cryptocercidae Brown-hooded Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Margined Leatherwing Chauliognathus marginatus Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier Beetle Podabrus rugosulus Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius sp. Coleoptera Carabidae Vivid Metallic Ground Beetle Chlaenius emarginatus Coleoptera Carabidae Six-spotted Tiger Beetle Cicindela sexguttata Coleoptera Cerambycidae Flower Longhorn Beetle Strangalia luteicornis Coleoptera Cerambycidae Locust Borer Megacyllene robiniae Coleoptera Cerambycidae Red
    [Show full text]
  • Noxious Weed Risk Assessment
    Sugarberry Project Final Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Appendix C Noxious Weed Risk Assessment Sugarberry Project Prepared for: USDA Forest Service Plumas National Forest Feather River Ranger District Prepared by: Date Chris Christofferson, Assistant District Botanist Plumas National Forest, Feather River Ranger District Reviewed and edited by: Date Linnea Hanson, District Botanist Plumas National Forest, Feather River Ranger District G:\~USFS WEBSITES\plumas\projects_and_plans\sugarberry_project\pdf\feis_specialist_reports\Botany\Appendix_C_N WRA_040307_FINAL.doc - 1 - Sugarberry Project Final Noxious Weed Risk Assessment INTRODUCTION This Noxious Weed Risk Assessment has been prepared to evaluate the effect of the Sugarberry project on California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) listed noxious weeds and other invasive non-native plant species. This assessment is in compliance with the Plumas National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA Forest Service 1988), the Herger-Feinstein Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act Final Environmental Impact Statement (USDA Forest Service 1999), the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision (USDA Forest Service 2001), and the direction in the Forest Service Manual section 2080, Noxious Weed Management (amendment effective since 11/29/95) (USDA Forest Service 1991), which includes a policy statement calling for a risk assessment for noxious weeds to be completed for every project. The overriding principle stated in these documents is that “…it is much cheaper to prevent an infestation from becoming established than to try to eliminate it once it has begun to spread, or deal with the effects of a degraded plant community.” Specifically, the manual states: 2081.03 - Policy. When any ground disturbing action or activity is proposed, determine the risk of introducing or spreading noxious weeds associated with the proposed action.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Insectos 2020 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos insectos 2020 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20202): Os nomes galegos dos insectos. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga /wp!content/up oads/achave_osnomesga egosdos"insectos"2020.pd# Fotografía: abella (Apis mellifera ). Autor: Jordi Bas. $sta o%ra est& su'eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a%erto( con reco)ecemento da autor*a e sen o%ra derivada nin usos comerciais. +esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.org/ icences/%,!nc-nd/-.0/deed.g . 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Na primeira edición deste recurso léxico (2018) fornecéronse denominacións para as especies máis coñecidas de insectos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algúns insectos exóticos (mostrados en ám itos divulgativos polo seu interese iolóxico, agr"cola, sil!"cola, médico ou industrial, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas)# Nesta segunda edición (2020) incorpórase o logo da $%a!e ao deseño do documento, corr"xese algunha gralla, reescr" ense as notas introdutorias e engádense algunhas especies e algún nome galego máis# &n total, ac%éganse nomes galegos para 89( especies de insectos# No planeta téñense descrito aproximadamente un millón de especies, e moitas están a"nda por descubrir# Na )en"nsula * érica %a itan preto de +0#000 insectos diferentes# Os nomes das ol oretas non se inclúen neste recurso léxico da $%a!e, foron o xecto doutro tra allo e preséntanse noutro documento da $%a!e dedicado exclusivamente ás ol oretas, a!ela"ñas e trazas . Os nomes galegos
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey
    CBRE | ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME III Appendix 9.8 TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATE SURVEY FORT HALSTEAD, KENT TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATE SURVEY A Report to: CBRE Ltd Report No: RT-MME-127947-08 Rev A Date Final Issued: November 2018 Date Rev A Issued: September 2019 Triumph House, Birmingham Road, Allesley, Coventry CV5 9AZ Tel: 01676 525880 Fax: 01676 521400 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.middlemarch-environmental.com Fort Halstead, Kent RT-MME-127947-08 Rev A Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey REPORT VERIFICATION AND DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE This study has been undertaken in accordance with British Standard 42020:2013 “Biodiversity, Code of practice for planning and development”. Report Date Completed by: Checked by: Approved by: Version Tom Docker Hannah Train Dr Philip Fermor MSc CEcol MCIEEM Rev A 12/09/2019 GradCIEEM (Senior CEnv MCIEEM (Associate Director, Ecological Consultant) (Managing Director) EIA) Richard Wright (Terrestrial Invertebrate Tom Docker Specialist) and Dr Philip Fermor MSc MCIEEM Final 28/11/2018 James Calow CEnv MCIEEM (Ecological Impact MPhil CEnv MCIEEM (Managing Director) Assessment Manager) MIEMA Mem.R.E.S (Ecological Consultant) The information which we have prepared is true, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that the opinions expressed are our true and professional bona fide opinions. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report are the responsibility of Middlemarch Environmental Ltd. It should be noted that, whilst every effort is made to meet the client’s brief, no site investigation can ensure complete assessment or prediction of the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) Der Schweiz – Checkliste Mit Verbreitungsangaben Nach Biogeografischen Regionen
    MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 83: 41–118, 2010 Die Rüsselkäfer (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) der Schweiz – Checkliste mit Verbreitungsangaben nach biogeografischen Regionen CHRISTOPH GERMANN Natur-Museum Luzern, Kasernenplatz 6, 6003 Luzern und Naturhistorisches Museum der Burger ge - meinde Bern, Bernastrasse 15, 3006 Bern; Email: [email protected] The weevils of Switzerland – Checklist (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea), with distribution data by bio - geo graphic regions. – A checklist of the Swiss weevils (Curculionoidea) including distributional pat- terns based on 6 bio-geographical regions is presented. Altogether, the 1060 species and subspecies out of the 10 families are composed of 21 Anthribidae, 129 Apionidae, 3 Attelabidae, 847 Cur cu lio - ni dae, 7 Dryophthoridae, 9 Erirhinidae, 13 Nanophyidae, 3 Nemonychidae, 3 Raymondionymidae, and 25 Rhynchitidae. Further, 13 synanthropic, 42 introduced species as well as 127 species, solely known based on old records, are given. For all species their synonymous names used in Swiss litera- ture are provided. 151 species classified as doubtful for the Swiss fauna are listed separately. Keywords: Curculionoidea, Checklist, Switzerland, faunistics, distribution EINLEITUNG Rüsselkäfer im weiteren Sinn (Curculionoidea) stellen mit über 62.000 bisher beschriebenen Arten und gut weiteren 150.000 zu erwartenden Arten (Oberprieler et al. 2007) die artenreichste Käferfamilie weltweit dar. Die ungeheure Vielfalt an Arten, Farben und Formen oder verschiedenartigsten Lebensweisen und damit ein - her gehenden Anpassungen fasziniert immer wieder aufs Neue. Eine auffällige Gemein samkeit aller Rüsselkäfer ist der verlängerte Kopf, welcher als «Rostrum» (Rüssel) bezeichnet wird. Rüsselkäfer sind als Phyto phage stets auf ihre Wirts- pflanzen angewiesen und folgen diesen bei uns von Unter wasser-Biotopen im pla- naren Bereich (u.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhinocyllus Conicus Froel
    Rhinocyllus conicus Froel INVASIVE SPECIES ATTACKED: Nodding thistle (Carduus nutans L.), bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten.), Canada thistle (C. arvense (L.) Scop.), marsh plume thistle (C. palustre (L.) Scop.) and plumeless thistle (C. acanthoides L.) TYPE OF AGENT: Seed feeding beetle (weevil) COLLECTABILITY: Mass ORIGIN: France DESCRIPTION AND LIFE CYCLE Adult: Adults are 3 - 7 mm long, oblong, black weevils (Powell et al. 1994; Harris 2005). They have patches of brown and light grey hairs distributed over their backs. Their rostrum (nose) is short, making it distinctly different from Larinus planus which occurs on many of the same plants (Harris 2005). The summer generation adults emerging in August have the same hair tufts as the spring generation, but the hair appears patchy yellow at first, which gives them the appearance of being covered with pollen (Coombs et al. 1996). Adults emerge from overwintering locations in the spring depending on the latitude, for example, in mid to late April in Virginia U.S.A. while in Alberta they appeared in early June Fig. 1. R. conicus adult (credit Powell et al. 1994) (Gassmann and Louda 2001). Emerged adults feed on foliage and disperse by flying, typically in the spring to seek out host plants for feeding, then breed and oviposit. Mating and egg-laying begins in early summer (Powell et al. 1994). Oviposition is concentrated at the beginning of the flowering season in Canada. The length of the oviposition period was found to vary from year to year in Montana (Gassmann and Louda 2001). Eggs are laid during the entire single flower phase of nodding thistle, but only during three waves of the plumeless thistle bloom phase.
    [Show full text]