DOCSLIB.ORG

NCC Received 25/07/2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NCC Received 25/07/2017 Invertebrate Survey of site at Barton-in-Fabis Nottinghamshire undertaken by Richard Wright NCC Received 25/07/2017 on behalf of PleydellSmithyman Limited September 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2. Habitats 2 3 Methods 2 4 Results 3 5 Discussion 6 6 Recommendations 6 7. References 7 Appendix 1 Complete list of species recorded 8 Appendix 2 Site plans 16 Received Appendix 3 Site habitat photographs 18 NCC 25/07/2017 1 1. Introduction The survey was carried out by Richard Wright, an experienced self-employed specialist invertebrate surveyor. An assessment was first made of the habitats present and the potential of the site for invertebrates. A survey was then carried out using methods considered most appropriate for the likely invertebrate assemblages. The specimens were identified and the results examined using Natural England's ISIS application to determine actual assemblages present. The species list was examined for any species deemed to be of conservation concern, i.e. those included in national or local BAPs, or designated as nationally scarce. Recommendations are made in this report for maintenance of the invertebrate interest of the site. 2. Habitats On the first visit the habitats present on the site and their potential invertebrate interest were assessed using the Phase 1 habitat survey map supplied. The major habitats present were : arable farmland with some uncultivated margins improved grassland semi-improved flowery grassland marshy grassland Received hedgerows small areas of broad-leaved woodland small areas of scrub NCC 25/07/2017 tall ruderal herbs a large pool, a small pond and a ditch From these habitats it was considered that the semi-improved and marshy grassland, together with wetter areas along the ditch and pool margins, were most likely to be of particular interest for invertebrates. While all habitats were surveyed, particular emphasis was placed on these. 3. Methods The site was visited on three occasions, 15th May, 12th June and 7th August, 2015. Weather conditions on each visit were dry, warm and suitable for survey. On the first and last visits, the whole site was walked and surveyed using a sweep net and beating tray. On the second visit, attention was confined to a representative sample of what were considered to be the most significant habitats as noted in 2. above. Fifty pitfall traps, ten lines each of five traps, were set on the first visit and emptied and removed on the second. Two lines of traps were set in the Barton Flash area, area 2 on Fig 2 in Appendix 2, the remainder 2 in area 1 on the same plan. In area 1, four lines were set in the semi-improved grassland, three lines in the marshy grassland and one line along the edge of the ditch. These were considered the habitats most likely to include invertebrate assemblages of interest. Each pitfall trap consisted of a clear plastic cup of top diameter 9 cms, sunk in the ground until the lip was flush with the ground surface, and filled with saturated salt solution as a preservative.. Pitfall traps are primarily of value in recording ground-running species, particularly beetles and spiders. The two pools were sampled on the last visit. However, both were difficult to acess with Pond 1 being largely surrounded by overhanging scrub and Pond 2 by extensive wet silty ground. Constraints There were no specific constraints on the survey. The survey covered the peak periods for a wide range of species and the sample is considered easily large enough to make a good assessment. 4. Results The total number of species recorded was 365. These were distributed as follows : Coleoptera (beetles) 174 Diptera (flies) 67 Hymenoptera – Aculeata (bees, wasps & ants) 11 Arachnida (spiders & harvestmen) 41 Hemiptera (true bugs & leafhoppers) 34 Received Lepidoptera (butterflies & moths) 11 Others 27 NCC 25/07/2017 The particularly large percentage of beetles is mainly because these were the dominant group in the pitfall traps. This number of species is considered more than adequate for a robust site assessment to be made. Analysis using ISIS ISIS is an Excel based application developed by Natural England to identify invertebrate assemblage types and scores each assemblage type according to its conservation value. ISIS is based on a definition of an assemblage as a suite of species occurring in the same piece of homogenous habitat. Two levels of assemblage type are recognised by ISIS: Broad Assemblage Types (BATs): These are characterised by species that are more widespread; Specific Assemblage Types (SATs): These are characterised by stenotopic species that are habitat specialists and considered to have intrinsic conservation value and are generally found on sites with conservation interest. SATs are more narrowly defined in terms of habitat type than BATs and each SAT is nested within a parent BAT. Assemblage types are linked to species by a coding system that carries information on the closeness 3 of their relationship. BATs are identified by a two digit code and SATs by a four digit code. It should be noted that not all invertebrate groups are included in the ISIS analysis. An assessment of the value of the invertebrate assemblages present within a site is then undertaken using the results generated and the species information provided by ISIS. The species list from the site was fed into ISIS and the results follow. The site was not considered to be in Favourable condition for any SAT or BAT. Very few species were noted as being associated with any SAT, reflecting the relative lack of the associated habitats on the site. SATs are therefore not considered further. By far the largest number of species (166) was allocated to BAT F2 grassland and scrub matrix. These are generally common species found widely in the general countryside in areas such as road verges, hedgerows and open woodland. They therefore have comparatively little value in site assessment. 41 species in total were allocated to wetland BATs, these being species which were found in the marshy grassland, in Barton Flash, around the pond margins and along the ditch. 27 species were allocated to BAT F1 unshaded early successional mosaic, these being species mainly recorded from the arable field margins. Species of conservation concern Species considered of conservation concern are those designated as Red Data Book or nationally scarce and also those included in national or local Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs). Received Six species, all beetles, are presently designated as nationally scarce, one of which is also included in the UK BAP. NCC 25/07/2017 Necklace Ground Beetle Carabus monilis (Carabidae) Biodiversity Action Plan UK list of priority species: Priority Species Present status “Nationally Notable “B”. Proposed revised status : Endangered A review of the statuses of British ground beetles is presently being undertaken by Dr. M.G.Telfer, organiser of the national recording scheme. In correspondence with the author of the present report, Dr. Telfer has indicated that he is proposing to change the status under the new IUCN guidelines to Endangered. This is a considerable elevation and is based on the fact that this large ground beetle has apparently undergone a greater decline than any other species, both in Britain and some other European countries. The habitat requirements of the species are not clear. Arable field margins are often quoted, but in the present author’s experience it is most often found in ungrazed and unmown grassland, particularly adjacent to hedgerows and woodland. There is some evidence that it is especially susceptible to the effects of pesticides and is therefore often found on less intensively managed ground. It is an annual species, with 4 adults mainly in summer. As far as the author has been able to determine from the NBN Gateway, all records for Nottinghamshire appear to be old, mainly from the 1920s, although this should be checked with the local Biological Records Centre. Sixteen specimens were found on the survey, all from pitfall traps in the semi-improved grassland shown in area 3 on Fig 3 in Appendix 2. It should be noted that : only a small part of the site could be surveyed with traps there is a large area of similar habitat on the site which suggests that there could potentially be a very large population of this beetle on the site. It should be noted that no specimens were found in the marshy grassland where the similar Carabus granulatus, a typical species of wetland habitats, was abundant. It therefore appears that C. monilis is confined to the unimproved grassland. Chlaenius nigricornis (Carabidae) Given Nationally Notable “B” status by Hyman & Parsons (1992) but this species is now known to be widespread and not uncommon over a large part of England and Wales with 725 records on the NBN Gateway. Very likely to lose its status in the review presently in progress. Associated with a wide variety of wetland habitats. A single specimen was found in a pitfall trap along the edge of the ditch in area 4 on Fig 3 in Appendix 2 Tillus elongatus (Cleridae) Received Given Nationally Notable “B” status by Hyman & Parsons (1992) revised to Scarce by Alexander (2014). Mainly in England south of the Humber. A predator of larvae of other beetles on old broad-leaved trees, and usually in hard dead heartwood. TheNCC 25/07/2017 larvae hunt nocturnally under bark and on the outside of the tree. A single specimen was swept from hogweed Heracleum sphondylium flowers near the river bank at point 1 on Fig 3 in Appendix 2. Possibly associated with old willows along the river bank. Microplontus campestris (Curculionidae) Given Nationally Notable “B” status by Hyman & Parsons (1992). A weevil associated with oxeye daisy Leucanthemum vulgare.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae) of the Fauna of Latvia
    Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 2009, Volumen 19, Numerus 2 DOI: 10.2478/v10043-009-0011-x ISSN 1648-6919 TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF FLEA BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: ALTICINAE) OF THE FAUNA OF LATVIA. 3. GENERA NEOCREPIDODERA HEIKERTINGER, 1911 AND CREPIDODERA CHEVROLAT, 1836 Andris BUKEJS Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Vienības 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Faunal data on four species of the genus Neocrepidodera Heikertinger, 1911 and on five spe- cies of the genus Crepidodera Chevrolat, 1836 are presented. A total of 806 specimens of these genera have been processed. The bibliographic information on these flea beetle genera in Latvia is summarised for the first time. One species, Crepidodera lamina (Bedel, 1901), is deleted from the list of Latvian Coleoptera. The annotated list of Latvian species is given, including five species of Neocrepidodera Heikertinger, 1911 and five species of Crepidodera Chevrolat, 1836. Key words: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Alticinae, Neocrepidodera, Crepidodera, fauna, Latvia INTRODUCT I ON and Pūtele 1976; Rūtenberga 1992; Barševskis 1993, 1997; Bukejs and Telnov 2007. The most recent lists of This publication continues our study on flea beetles of Latvian Neocrepidodera and Crepidodera can be found the Latvian fauna (Bukejs 2008b, c). in the published catalogues of Latvian Coleoptera by There are 48 species and subspecies of the genus Neo- Telnov et al. (1997) and Telnov (2004), respectively. crepidodera Heikertinger, 1911 and 17 species of the The imagoes of Crepidodera feed on leaves of Salix genus Crepidodera Chevrolat, 1836 known in the Pa- and Populus. The larvae of Crepidodera aurata (Mar- laearctic region (Gruev & Döberl 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 573: 387–512 (2016)Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada 387 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada Reginald P. Webster1 1 24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E3C 1X1 Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 3 February 2016 | Accepted 29 February 2016 | Published 24 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/34473062-17C2-4122-8109-3F4D47BB5699 Citation: Webster RP (2016) Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 387–512. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 Abstract All 3,062 species of Coleoptera from 92 families known to occur in New Brunswick, Canada, are re- corded, along with their author(s) and year of publication using the most recent classification framework. Adventive and Holarctic species are indicated. There are 366 adventive species in the province, 12.0% of the total fauna. Keywords Checklist, Coleoptera, New Brunswick, Canada Introduction The first checklist of the beetles of Canada by Bousquet (1991) listed 1,365 species from the province of New Brunswick, Canada. Since that publication, many species have been added to the faunal list of the province, primarily from increased collection efforts and
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Coleoptera Des Kreises Altenburg“ Vorgelegt Werden
    ©Mauritianum, Naturkundliches Museum Altenburg Mauritiana (Altenburg) 14 (1993) 3, S. 243-254 Fauna Coleóptera des Kreises Altenburg Zweite Ergänzung Erwin Naumann Zusammenfassung: Seit 1987 wurden im Kreis Altenburg 147 Käferarten erstmals nachgcwicscn und in die vorliegende Übersicht neben weiteren aufgenommen. Damit ergibt sich, daß in der Zeit 1838 — 1990 im untersuchten Gebiet ca. 1 800 Käferarten registriert wurden. Nach der Veröffentlichung der ersten Ergänzung im Jahre 1989 mit dem Stand der faunistischen Erfassung bis zum 31. 12. 1986 kann nun die zweite Ergänzung der „Fauna Coleoptera des Kreises Altenburg“ vorgelegt werden. Ich halte es für sinnvoll, auch für die zweite Ergänzung die bisherige Form bcizubchaltcn. Wenn bei verschiedenen Arten die Fundjahre noch in die Zeit der vorangegangenen Zusammenstellungen gehören, ist das darin begründet, daß die Determination dieser Exemplare erst später erfolgte oder die Fundmeldungen vorher nicht bekannt waren. Wie bisher weisen die Abkürzungen im Anschluß an die Fundort-Angabe daraufhin, daß Erwin Naumann (N) oder U lrich Poller (P) diese Art nachwiesen. Gehen Fundnachweise auf andere Personen zurück, ist das namentlich oder in Fußnoten vermerkt. Zwei Kreuze (+ + ) weisen darauf hin, daß diese Art erstmals im Kreisgebiet nachgewiesen wurden. Ein Kreuz (-(-) deutet einen neuen Fundort an, ohne Kreuz sind die Arten vermerkt, die seit längerer Zeit wieder nachgewiesen wurden. In dieser zweiten Ergänzung1) sind nur die Arten aufgenommen, die nach dem gegenwärtig gültigen und bekannten nomenklatorischen Stand bzw. von Koleopterologen determiniert wurden, deren fachliche Kompetenz anerkannt ist. So bedanke ich mich für die Determina­ tion der Käfer verschiedener Familien bei Herrn Dr. Scholz , Herrn Dr. Müller - Motzfeld , Herrn Dr. Hieke, Herrn Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
    [Show full text]
  • Hohestein – Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 2
    Naturw.res.07-A4:Layout 1 09.11.2007 13:10 Uhr Seite 1 HESSEN Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, HESSEN ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz www.hmulv.hessen.de Naturwaldreservate in Hessen HOHESTEINHOHESTEIN ZOOLOGISCHEZOOLOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGENUNTERSUCHUNGEN Zoologische Untersuchungen – Naturwaldreservate in Hessen Naturwaldreservate Hohestein NO OO 7/2.2 NN 7/2.27/2.2 Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 7/2.2 Hohestein Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 2 Wolfgang H. O. Dorow Jens-Peter Kopelke mit Beiträgen von Andreas Malten & Theo Blick (Araneae) Pavel Lauterer (Psylloidea) Frank Köhler & Günter Flechtner (Coleoptera) Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 42 Impressum Herausgeber: Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Mainzer Str. 80 65189 Wiesbaden Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 3 34131 Kassel Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Grätzelstr. 2 37079 Göttingen http://www.nw-fva.de Dieser Band wurde in wissenschaftlicher Kooperation mit dem Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg erstellt. – Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 42 – Titelfoto: Der Schnellkäfer Denticollis rubens wurde im Naturwaldreservat „Hohestein“ nur selten gefunden. Die stark gefährdete Art entwickelt sich in feuchtem, stärker verrottetem Buchenholz. (Foto: Frank Köhler) Layout: Eva Feltkamp, 60486 Frankfurt Druck: Elektra Reprographischer Betrieb GmbH, 65527 Niedernhausen Umschlaggestaltung: studio
    [Show full text]
  • Rhabdoscelus Obscurus
    Rhabdoscelus obscurus Scientific Name Rhabdoscelus obscurus (Boisduval, 1835) Synonyms: Calandra obscura Boisduval, Rhabdocnemis beccarii Faust, Rhabdocnemis fausti Gahan, Rhabdocnemis interruptecostata Faust, Rhabdocnemis interruptocostatus Schaufuss, Rhabdocnemis maculata Schaufuss, Rhabdocnemis nudicollis (Kirsch), Rhabdocnemis obscura Boisduval, Rhabdocnemis obscurus (Boisduval), Rhabdocnemis promissus (Pascoe), Figure 1: Rhabdoscelus obscurus, photo by Rhabdoscelis obscura Boisduval, Anthony O'Toole (http://www.ento.csiro.au/aicn/name_s/b_3568.htm) Rhabdoscelus maculatus Schaufuss, Sphenophorus beccarii Pascoe, Sphenophorus insularis Boheman, Sphenophorus interruptecostatus Schaufuss, Sphenophorus nidicollis Kirsh, Sphenophorus obscura BIoisduval, Sphenophorus obscurus Boisduval, Sphenophorus promissus Pascoe, Sphenophorus sulcipes Karsch, Sphenophorus tincturatus Pascoe Note: Recent DNA work on weevil populations from Australia, Papua New Guinea, Hawaii, and Fiji suggests that the Australian population has enough differences to be considered a separate species (Sallam, 2013, personal communication). Because this issue has not been confirmed, this datasheet includes information on the Australian population as well. Common Name New Guinea sugarcane weevil, sugar cane weevil, New Guinea cane weevil borer, beetle borer, cane weevil borer, Hawaiian sugarcane borer Type of Pest Weevil Taxonomic Position Class: Insecta, Order: Coleoptera, Family: Dryophthoridae Reason for Inclusion in Manual FY2013 Additional Pests of Concern List Pest Description Illustrations of all stages can be found in Napompeth et al. (1972). Detailed descriptions of all stages can be found in Riley (1888), Terry (1907), and Muir and Swezey (1916). Last updated: July 29, 2016 1 This species is highly variable in morphology, color, and host preference (reviewed in Giblin-Davis, 2001). 1 Eggs: The eggs of R. obscurus are 1 to 2 mm (approx. /16 in) in length, ivory white in color, and slightly curved (USDA, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) Attacking Coleoptera with a Key for Their Identification
    Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Autor(en): Keller, Siegfried Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft = Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse = Journal of the Swiss Entomological Society Band (Jahr): 86 (2013) Heft 3-4 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-403074 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 86: 261-279.2013 Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Siegfried Keller Rheinweg 14, CH-8264 Eschenz; [email protected] A key to 30 species of entomophthoralean fungi is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera)
    BULLETIN OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF MALTA (2010) Vol. 3 : 55-143 The Curculionoidea of the Maltese Islands (Central Mediterranean) (Coleoptera) David MIFSUD1 & Enzo COLONNELLI2 ABSTRACT. The Curculionoidea of the families Anthribidae, Rhynchitidae, Apionidae, Nanophyidae, Brachyceridae, Curculionidae, Erirhinidae, Raymondionymidae, Dryophthoridae and Scolytidae from the Maltese islands are reviewed. A total of 182 species are included, of which the following 51 species represent new records for this archipelago: Araecerus fasciculatus and Noxius curtirostris in Anthribidae; Protapion interjectum and Taeniapion rufulum in Apionidae; Corimalia centromaculata and C. tamarisci in Nanophyidae; Amaurorhinus bewickianus, A. sp. nr. paganettii, Brachypera fallax, B. lunata, B. zoilus, Ceutorhynchus leprieuri, Charagmus gressorius, Coniatus tamarisci, Coniocleonus pseudobliquus, Conorhynchus brevirostris, Cosmobaris alboseriata, C. scolopacea, Derelomus chamaeropis, Echinodera sp. nr. variegata, Hypera sp. nr. tenuirostris, Hypurus bertrandi, Larinus scolymi, Leptolepurus meridionalis, Limobius mixtus, Lixus brevirostris, L. punctiventris, L. vilis, Naupactus cervinus, Otiorhynchus armatus, O. liguricus, Rhamphus oxyacanthae, Rhinusa antirrhini, R. herbarum, R. moroderi, Sharpia rubida, Sibinia femoralis, Smicronyx albosquamosus, S. brevicornis, S. rufipennis, Stenocarus ruficornis, Styphloderes exsculptus, Trichosirocalus centrimacula, Tychius argentatus, T. bicolor, T. pauperculus and T. pusillus in Curculionidae; Sitophilus zeamais and
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Els Coleòpters Del Delta Del Llobregat. Aproximació Històrica I Noves Aportacions
    13. ELS COLEÒPTERS DEL DELTA DEL LLOBREGAT. APROXIMACIÓ HISTÒRICA I NOVES APORTACIONS Miguel Prieto Manzanares1 1. Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona. delta-llobregat.indb 407 12/12/2018 16:51:22 408 ELS SISTEMES NATURALS DEL DELTA DEL LLOBREGAT 13.1. INTRODUCCIÓ Els treballs esmentats no es limiten a una llista taxonòmica, sinó que també inclouen El valor natural del delta del Llobregat va ser informació sobre l’hàbitat i la biologia de les reconegut ben aviat pels entomòlegs, que des espècies. Mateu (1947), en particular, ofereix de mitjan segle xix van freqüentar la zona una descripció exhaustiva del territori i el per a la recol·lecció i l’estudi dels coleòpters. seus ecosistemes a propòsit de l’estudi de la La proximitat amb els nuclis metropolitans família dels caràbids (de la qual va citar gai- de les comarques del Baix Llobregat i el Bar- rebé 150 espècies). Amb vocació conserva- celonès, especialment amb la ciutat de Barce- cionista, aquest i altres entomòlegs alerten de lona, va afavorir la presència dels naturalis- la degradació i l’empobriment del Delta cau- tes, atrets per la gran diversitat d’hàbitats, sats pel creixement industrial i la urbanitza- aleshores inalterats o sotmesos a transforma- ció, ja evidents en aquella època (Mateu, cions incipients. El primer catàleg de coleòp- 1947; Español, 1949a; Lagar, 1967a, 1970 i ters de Catalunya (Cuní Martorell i Martorell 1976; Lagar i Lucas, 1981). A partir del anys Peña, 1876) recull, de fet, nombrosos regis- setanta disminueixen els estudis sobre els co- tres de la desembocadura del Llobregat i leòpters de la zona, coincidint amb un nou àrees adjacents, la majoria corresponents a impuls en els plans de desenvolupament, localitats clàssiques de l’hemidelta esquerre.
    [Show full text]