10 Downing Street

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10 Downing Street 10 DOWNING STREET Private and Confidential. 16th January, 1981 When you came to see the Prime Minister last evening, I think that we all agreed that it was likely to be unhelpful to our Party if differences of view within the Party about our Policy towards the Community were to be ventilated in public, particularly so far as the two particular groupings are concerned. Just after our meeting, I was handed a copy of your letter dated December 1980, and I must say that I do think that that letter is likely to stir rather than to diminish controversy. Perhaps we could have a word about this. Ian Gow Hugh Dykes, Esq., M.P. b.c.c. The Rt. Hon. Michael Jopling, M.P. The Rt. Hon. Lord Thorneycroft, CH. Deputy Otalrman: Patrons. At Hon Margaret Thatcher MP Miss Beryl Goldsmith Rt Hon Harold Macmillan OM FRS Vke-Olairmen: Rt Hon Lord Home of the Hirsel KT MIDavid Hunt MBE MP Rt Hon Lord Duncan-Sandys CH Mr Peter Price MEP Lord Chelwood MC DL ONSE Mr Frank Richardson Rt Hon Lord Carrington KCMG MC Rt Hon Geoffrey Rippon QC MP Hon. Treasurer' GROUP FOR EUROPEMr Peter Smith President: Rt Hon Edward Heath MBE MP 1 Registend Ofrim: Chairinan: Mr Hugh Dykes MP Europe House Club Vice-Presidents: I A W'Wteliall Phm Sir Gilbert Longden MBE Mr James Scott-Hopkins MEP London SW1A 2HA Mr Jim Spicer MEF' MP Tel: 01-839 6622 December, 1980 Dear Member, You may have seen in the press that a number of Conservative MPs have recently formed an "EEC Reform" group with the following aims: 'ABOLITION OF THE CAP (Nate: This would, of course, involve the British taxpayers finding about £1,500 million per year to restore the deficiency payments system to our farmers.) REFORMING THE EEC BUDGET SO THAT CONTRIBUTIONS MATCH PAYMENTS BACK RESTORING CERTAIN TRADE POWERS AND ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES TO THE NATION STATE - RESTORING TO NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS POWER OVER THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY The founders of the group insist that they are not in favour of UK withdrawal from the Community, although there are a good nvmber of enthusiastic "withdrawers" among the 40-odd Members. However, the objectives above are definitely and completely incompatible with membership and with adherence to thr. Treat!_es, as tae Government has already made clear. The CGE believes that the Community needs a good number of reforms and improvements, but the above demands would, of course, wreck the Community. Please peruse the attached list of Members of the Group, as you may reside in the constituency of one of them, We would be glad if you felt inclined to contact the Member concerned to express- your misgivings, for this Group can only cause disunity within our Party, at the very moment when the Prime Minister has established a new and strong position for the United Kingdom in the Community. More and more we see that the "anti's" (of whichever party) are wrongly blaming the EEC for our own grave economic problems, on which they should urgently beconcentrating rather than using the 'Common Market' as the scapegoat for all that is wrong. Yours sincerely, HUGH DYKES Chairman RI GISTI.R1ID IN ENGLAND No 551817 AS THE EUROPEAN MOVEMENT (BRITISH COUNCIL) LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONSERVATIVE EUROPEAN REFORM GROUP (Membership at 12/12/80) Member of Parliament Constituency Jonathan Aitken-. Thanet East *Richard Alexander Newark J--- *JackAkspinwall Kingswooi Anthony Beaumont-Dark.- Selly Oak (Birmingham) Sir Ronald Bell Beaconsfield *David Bevan Yardley (Birmingham) John Bladkburn Dudley West Richard Body Holland with Boston *Sir Nicholas Bonsor, Bt Nantwich *Michael Brown . Brigg & Scunthorpe *John 'Browne Winchester John Butcher Coventry South-West *John-Carlisle Luton West - The Hon..Alan Clark PlymOuth, Sutton *Geoffrey Dickens - Huddersfield West Den Dover Chorley *Robert-Dunn Dartford John Farr Harborough Peter Fry Wellingborough .*Peter Griffiths Portsmouth North Warren Hawksley The Wrekin Charles Irving Cheltenham Toby Jessel Twickenham Mrs. Jill Knight, MBE Edgbaston (Birmingham) Michael Latham Melton *Peter Lloyd Fareham Albert McQuarrie Aberdeenshire East *Tony Marlow Northampton North Roger Moate Faversham *Christopher Murphy Welwyn & Hatfield Gerry Neale Cornwall North *Matthew Parris Derbyshire West JPmPs Pawsey Rugby *Larry Porter Bebington & Ellesmer3 Port Harvey Proctor Basildon . *Richard Shepherd Aldridge Brownhills Tony Speller Devon North Keith Stainton Sudbury & Woodbridge Robert Taylor Croydon North-West Edward Taylor Southend East *Neil Thorne, OBE., TD Ilford South John Townend Bridlington *Bill Walker Perth & Perthshire East Gary Waller Brighouse & Spenborough Nicholas Winterton Macclesfield New Members elected May 1979 Letters should be addressed to Members of Parliament at HOUSE OF COMMONS, LONDON, SW1A OAA PLEASE READ OVERLEAF.../ . _ — EXTRACT FROM HANSARD -- - WRITTEN ANSWERS 1 7 DECEMBER 1980 Conservative European As regards the third aim, independent Reform Group action by membef States on dumping or Mr. Teddy Taylor asked the I.,ord other unfair trade practices- by 'third Privy Seal if he will make a statement, countries :would be incompatible with '- pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member chapter 3 of the Treaty of Rome and in for Flint, West (Sir A. Meyer) on 3 particular with article 113 which ex- December, Official Report, 3 December, plicitly states that c. 395, explainMg how the aims of the "...the common commercial polic) shall be based on uniform principles, particularly in Conservative European Reform Group regard to . measures to protect trade suc) are incompatible with continued mem- as those to be taken in case of dumping . .". bership of _ the European Economic Since the European Community is a, full Community. customs union within which goods Sir Ian Gilmour [pursuant to the Min- circulate freely, anti-dumping action has ister of State's reply, 9 December 1980, to be on a Community basis if it is to be c. 5431: The first announced aim of the effeetive. So the restoration to member European Reform Group is the ending States of the -right to take unilateral of the common agricultural policy. This action on unfair trading practices includ- aim is incompatible with our member- ing dumping is inconsistent - with our ship of the European Community. The obligations under the common com- Treaty of Rome in articles 38 to 46 ex- mercial policy and would weaken the plicitly requires that there should be a effectiveness of the Community's action common agricultural policy. -Article 39, as a whole. in particular, states what the objectives The group's fourth aim is- the:re- of the CAP shall be, - , _ assertion of the power of national parlia- to increase agricultural productivity . to ments over the European Community ensure a 'fair standard of living for the Agri- institutions. The powers of the European cultural Community... to stabilise markets... Community institutions are set out in the - to assure the availability of supplies . to treaties to which the United Kingdom ensure that the supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices". acceded under the Treaty of Accession. The reassertion of the power of national The Government, like all British Govern- Parliaments over the institutions of the ments since our membership, support the Community in such a way as to interfere objectives of the CAP as set out in this with the powers conferred by the Article. They are similar to the objectives treaties on those institutions would be of British agricultural policy before our incompatible with the obligations we membership of the Community. The accepted when we ratified the Treaty of Government are not, however, satisfied with the present workings of the policy. Accession. In practice, however, the vast Our view of the need for far-reaching majority of important decisions in the European Community are taken by the reforms in its operation is shared increas- ingly by other member States, some of Council on the basis of consensus. Ministers are as accountable to Parlia- - vhic)- have alreaay put fa-ward ideas of their own. This is quite possible within ment for their Community activities as the framework of the Treaty. Rather they are for any other activities. The than abolition of the CAP, it is effective scrutiny procedures of this House pro- reform of the policy which is needed_ vide for examination of draft Com- The commitment to restructuring of the munity legislation before it is approved Community budget achieved in the 30 by the Council of - Ministers. The May agreement provides a unique oppor- Government have undertaken to the tunity to bring this about. House not to give approval in the On the group's second aim, reform Council of Ministers to a proposal which of the system of financing the budget, has been recommended for a debate by the Government agree that we must the House before that debate has taken work for a better balance in European place, save in exceptional circumstances Community net budget contributions. or where the Scrutiny Committee agrees that United Kingdom consent in Council We have already achieved a great deal in this area. We shall be seeking further need not be withheld. progress during the process of examina- tion of the Community bluigrt whir‘h will take place, in accordance with the agree- ment of 30 May, during 19R1. In the agreement, our partners have accepted thet need to prevent the recurrence of unacceptable situations for any in- dividual member State and to review the whole structure of Community expendi- ture policies. 10 DOWNING STREET .y Ictter 11,1 v, t, ''111.(" t-A• . t 'e 1 , t; a. F. c_ g2 r From: Hugh Dykes, MP I was wondering if it would be possible for David Hunt and me,representing the Cons. Group for Europe,to come and see the PM briefly in the next few weeks.
Recommended publications
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 571 29 November 2013 No. 85 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 29 November 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 527 29 NOVEMBER 2013 528 House of Commons European Union (Referendum) Bill Further consideration of Bill, not amended in the Public Bill Committee Friday 29 November 2013 Clause 1 The House met at half-past Nine o’clock REFERENDUM ON THE UNITED KINGDOM’S PRAYERS MEMBERSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Amendment proposed: 35, page 1, leave out lines 8 and 9 and insert [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] ‘Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?’.—(Mike Gapes.) BILL PRESENTED Question put, That the amendment be made. The House proceeded to a Division. UNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT (SOVEREIGNTY)BILL Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57) Mr Speaker: I ask the Serjeant at Arms to investigate Mr William Cash, supported by Mr Bernard Jenkin, the delay in both the Aye and No Lobbies. Mr John Redwood, Sir Edward Leigh, Sir Gerald Howarth, The House having divided: Ayes 3, Noes 244. Mr John Baron, Mr Peter Bone, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Henry Smith, Chris Heaton-Harris, Mr James Clappison Division No. 141] [9.35 am and Sir Richard Shepherd, presented a Bill to make provision for the supremacy of the sovereignty of the AYES United Kingdom Parliament in relation to the United Bailey, Mr Adrian Tellers for the Ayes: Kingdom’s membership of the European Union; and Gapes, Mike Susan Elan Jones and for connected purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Restraint in Secure Training Centres
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights The Use of Restraint in Secure Training Centres Eleventh Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, and oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 26 February 2008 Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 26 February 2008 HL Paper 65 HC 378 Published on 7 March 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & The Earl of Onslow Abingdon) Baroness Stern Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process
    House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1097 House of Commons Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 July 2006 HC 1097 Published on 7 September 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the House operates and to make recommendations for modernisation. Current membership Mr Jack Straw (Labour, Blackburn) (Chairman) Mr Paul Burstow, (Liberal Democrat, Sutton & Cheam) Ms Dawn Butler (Labour, Brent South) Ann Coffey (Labour, Stockport) Mr George Howarth (Labour, Knowsley North & Sefton East) Mr Greg Knight (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Mark Lazarowicz (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Mrs Theresa May (Conservative, Maidenhead) Mr Adrian Sanders, (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Richard Shepherd (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Edward Vaizey (Conservative, Wantage) Lynda Waltho (Labour, Stourbridge) Sir Nicholas Winterton (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Liz Blackman (Labour, Erewash) Chris Grayling (Conservative, Epsom and Ewell) Mr David Heath (Liberal Democrat, Somerton and Frome) Mr Geoffrey Hoon (Labour, Ashfield) (Chairman) Jessica Morden (Labour, Newport East) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Sustainable Food Supply Chains
    Report Sustainable Food Supply Chains Industry and Parliament Trust THE LONG AND THE SHORT OF IT SUSTAINABLE FOOD SUPPLY CHAINS INTRODUCTION 3. Introduction 4. Key Issues The Issues and Challenges of Sustainable Food Supply Chains Introduction “Sustainable food 5. Key Issue One How the Market Operates supply chains would In January 2013, the Food Safety Authority reported that horse 6. Key Issue Two DNA had been found in beef burgers being sold by five major be those which Volunteerism or Regulation? retailers in Britain and Ireland. The public outcry and subsequent help MEET THE 8. Site Visit One debate prompted by the “horsemeat scandal” raised issues about NEEDS OF THE Visit to Sodexo UK and Ireland - By Huw Irranca-Davies MP the supply chains of the food being sold to UK consumers and about levels of trust between food businesses and their customers. PRESENT without 9 Site Visit Two compromising the Visit to McCain Foods by Andrew Kuyk CBE It was this far-reaching public debate – together with the ability of 10. Key Issue Three recognition that food supply chain issues extend beyond issues Engaging with People as Citizens and Consumers of integrity alone – that prompted the Industry and Parliament FUTURE Trust, the University of Warwick and the Food Ethics Council to 12. Case Study One GENERATIONS establish the Sustainable Food Supply Chains Commission. The McDonald’s, Great Britain and Northern Ireland aim of the Commission was to explore the challenges facing food to meet their own 13. Case Study Two companies in ensuring the sustainability of their supply chains, and needs” Divine Chocolate to investigate the most significant upcoming policy developments – 14.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Food Choice Shepherd E Raats 2006.Pdf
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE This series of books addresses a wide range of topics in nutritional science. The books are aimed at advanced undergraduate and graduate students, researchers, university teachers, policy-makers and nutrition and health professionals. They offer original syntheses of knowledge, providing a fresh perspective on key topics in nutritional science. Each title is written by a single author or by groups of authors who are acknowledged experts in their field. Titles include aspects of molecular, cellular and whole-body nutrition and cover humans and wild, captive and domesticated animals. Basic nutritional science, clinical nutrition and public health nutrition are each addressed by titles in the series. Editor in Chief P.C. Calder, University of Southampton, UK Editorial Board A. Bell, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA F. Kok, Wageningen University, The Netherlands A. Lichtenstein, Tufts University, Massachusetts, USA I. Ortigues-Marty, INRA, Thiex, France P. Yaqoob, University of Reading, UK K. Younger, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland Titles available 1. Nutrition and Immune Function Edited by P.C. Calder, C.J. Field and H.S. Gill 2. Fetal Nutrition and Adult Disease: Programming of Chronic Disease through Fetal Exposure to Undernutrition Edited by S.C. Langley-Evans 3. The Psychology of Food Choice Edited by R. Shepherd and M. Raats This page intentionally left blank THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FOOD CHOICE Edited by Richard Shepherd and Monique Raats Food, Consumer Behaviour and Health Research Centre Department of Psychology University of Surrey Guildford, UK in association with The Nutrition Society CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org ©The Authors 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Author Copy Gifford C. (2006) 'The Rise of Post-Imperial Populism: The
    University of Huddersfield Repository Gifford, Chris The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain Original Citation Gifford, Chris (2006) The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (5). pp. 851-869. ISSN 0304-4130 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/558/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Author copy Gifford C. (2006) ‘The rise of post-imperial populism: The case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain’, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 851-869. The rise of post-imperial populism: the case of right wing Euroscepticism in Britain Abstract Recent approaches to contemporary Euroscepticism have explained it in terms of the politics of opposition and peripherality that is characteristic of competitive party systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill of Rights for the UK?
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights A Bill of Rights for the UK? Twenty–ninth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 21 July 2008 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2008 HL Paper 165-I HC 150-I Published on 10 August 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Douglas Carswell MP (Conservative, Harwich) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & The Earl of Onslow Abingdon) Baroness Stern Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]