DOCSLIB.ORG

Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA) September 23, 1987, Wednesday

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA) September 23, 1987, Wednesday Christian Science Monitor (Boston, MA) September 23, 1987, Wednesday Signs of hardened stands in Gulf BYLINE: Peter Grier, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor. Staff writer E.A. Wayne contributed to this report. SECTION: National; Pg. 1 LENGTH: 916 words DATELINE: Washington HIGHLIGHT: Evidence of mining boosts administration's policy toward Iran Reaction in Washington was generally supportive of Monday's US Navy attack on an Iranian mine- laying ship. But the question of retaliation now looms large, according to US officials and other experts, as does the possible effect of the affair on United Nations diplomacy. Specifically: *Will Iran, embarrassed at being caught dumping mines in the Persian Gulf, return the US blow - perhaps with a terrorist attack? *Will members of the UN Security Council, moved by pictures of Iranian mines ready for sowing, be more likely to approve an arms embargo against the Tehran government? Though there has been much criticism in Washington of the Reagan administration's naval buildup in the Gulf, reaction to the way the force was employed in this case was generally positive. Rep. Les Aspin (D) of Wisconsin, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a vociferous critic of administration's Gulf policy, said that the attack was a ''necessary response.'' By sowing mines days after hosting UN Secretary-General Javier Perez de Cuellar's peace mission, Iran was ''thumbing its nose at the world community,'' Representative Aspin said. The UN should slap some sort of sanctions on Tehran, the chairman said, or more repugnant behavior is likely to follow. In a television interview, Sen. Richard Lugar (R) of Indiana also supported the attack, saying ''clearly we've caught them dead to rights.'' Some Middle East experts, however, did worry that the military action in the Gulf will serve to harden Iran's attitude at the moment when diplomacy is making some small headway in the region. ''I think this undermines the diplomatic option,'' said R.K. Ramazani, a political science professor at the University of Virginia, adding that he wishes the Navy had boarded and confiscated the ship instead of shooting at it. Rhetoric among Iranian officials was running high in response to the altercation. Iranian President Ali Khamenei, in his Tuesday speech to the UN, denounced the act and vowed revenge. And whenever Iran mentions revenge, US officials almost reflexively think ''terrorism.'' US antiterrorism specialists, in recent conversations, have stressed that Iran retains the capability to carry out anti-American terror strikes in the Mideast, Europe, and perhaps the US. These experts deem a strike in the US a relatively unlikely response, however, as Iran realizes what kind of response that would be likely to elicit. William Quandt, a Middle East expert at the Brookings Institution, said the Iranian response, if any, to the US attack will depend crucially on their motivation for mining in the first place. If the mines were being dumped on the orders of a hard-line Revolutionary Guards faction, against the wishes of the regular armed forces, there could be ''secret applause'' in Tehran about the affair, Mr. Quandt said. But if the Iranian government was united in its support for the mining, reaction could be more serious, he said. Finally, the bullets-for-mines exchange in the Gulf could well affect the chances for UN Security Council passage of an arms embargo against Iran, US officials and other experts say. The US has supported this move, while some other Council members, such as China and the Soviet Union, have indicated little enthusiasm for the step. Clear evidence of Iranian wrongdoing could be seen as a slap at the UN, these analysts say, pushing reluctant members of the Council toward the US position. A US official interviewed before the attack took place said that the US will soon begin a ''full-court press'' in the Security Council to win passage of arms sanctions. In an indication of the growing awareness of the danger of Iranian reaction, the US and several Western European allies have decided to split up minesweeping duties in the Persian Gulf, according to reports from the region. The US will be responsible for clearing the northern half of Gulf waters, while the Netherlands, Britain, France, Belgium, and possibly Italy will clear southern areas and the Gulf of Oman, just outside the Gulf. Meanwhile, information about the US-Iranian confrontation remained relatively sketchy yesterday. Defense Department spokesman Fred Hoffman said that no effort was made to communicate with the Iranian vessel before US helicopters attacked. No warning shots were fired, he said. Mr. Hoffman indicated that the Iranian vessel - an amphibious landing ship of non-US construction named Iran Ajr - was one the US had followed with suspicion for some time. ''The US Navy was aware this ship had the potential for laying mines,'' spokesman Hoffman said. US pilots, using night-vision equipment, saw six mines rolled into the water, according to the Pentagon. With permission from the commander of the Navy's Middle East Force they then opened fire with machine guns and rockets. Yesterday, the Navy frigate USS Jarrett fired warning shots near a high-speed Iranian hovercraft in the Gulf, the Defense Department reported. The Iranian naval boat at first ignored warnings to halt its approach but turned away after the Jarrett fired. Thirty-one members were on board the ship struck by the US Monday. Three were killed, according to the Pentagon. Two are still missing, and 26 are now in custody on board US warships. Tehran radio said five crewmen were killed. The Iranian sailors are not to be held prisoner. White House spokesman Marlin Fitzwater said Tuesday that they will be repatriated to Iran as soon as possible. PERSON: DICK LUGAR (54%); ALI KHAMENEI (52%); ORGANIZATION: US NAVY (90%); UNITED NATIONS (84%); UNITED NATIONS (84%); COUNTRY: UNITED STATES (99%); IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF (97%); MIDDLE EAST (93%); GULF STATES (92%); IRAN (90%); STATE: INDIAN OCEAN (92%); MASSACHUSETTS, USA (79%); INDIANA, USA (79%); CITY: TEHRAN, IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF (90%); BOSTON, MA, USA (79%); COMPANY: US NAVY (90%); UNITED NATIONS (84%); UNITED NATIONS (84%); SUBJECT: NAVIES (90%); PUBLIC POLICY (90%); UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTIONS (90%); TERRORISM (89%); DEFENSE & MILITARY POLICY (78%); US PRESIDENTS (78%); INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (77%); PEACE PROCESS (77%); EMBARGOES & SANCTIONS (77%); COUNTERTERRORISM (76%); APPROVALS (72%); POLITICAL SCIENCE (70%); ARMS EMBARGOES (70%); INTERVIEWS (69%); RESEARCH INSTITUTES (62%); COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS (50%); LANGUAGE: ENGLISH GRAPHIC: Map, Gulf Minesweeping Plan;Source:Associated Press, Reuters, JOAN RAPAPORT - STAFF Copyright 1987 The Christian Science Publishing Society .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ship Covers Relating to the Iran/Iraq Tanker War
    THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR AND RENAMED TANKERS ~ Lawrence Brennan, (US Navy Ret.) SHIP COVERS RELATING TO THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR & REFLAGGED KUWAITI TANKERS, 1987-881 “The Kuwaiti fleet reads like a road map of southern New Jersey” By Captain Lawrence B. Brennan, U.S. Navy Retired2 Thirty years ago there was a New Jersey connection to the long-lasting Iran-Iraq War. That eight years of conflict was one of the longest international two-state wars of the 20th century, beginning in September 1980 and effectively concluding in a truce in August 1988. The primary and bloody land war between Iran and Iraq began during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Shah had left Iran and that year the USSR invaded Afghanistan. The conflict expanded to sea and involved many neutral nations whose shipping came under attack by the combatants. The parties’ intent was to damage their opponents’ oil exports and revenues and decrease world supplies. Some suggested that Iran and Iraq wanted to draw other states into the conflict. An Iranian source explained the origin of the conflict at sea. The tanker war seemed likely to precipitate a major international incident for two reasons. First, some 70 percent of Japanese, 50 percent of West European, and 7 percent of American oil imports came from the Persian Gulf in the early 1980s. Second, the assault on tankers involved neutral shipping as well as ships of the belligerent states.3 The relatively obscure first phase began in 1981, and the well-publicized second phase began in 1984. New Jersey, half a world away from the Persian (Arabian) gulf, became involved when the United States agreed to escort Kuwait tankers in an effort to support a friendly nation and keep the international waters open.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice Admiral Dixon R. Smith Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics
    Vice Admiral Dixon R. Smith Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics Vice Adm. Dixon Smith is a native of Green Farms, Connecticut, and entered the Naval Academy Preparatory School in 1978. After receiving his commission from the United States Naval Academy in 1983, he was designated a surface warfare officer in 1985. Smith holds a master’s degree in business from Webster University and is a graduate of the Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Smith’s first sea tour was aboard USS Miller (FF 1091), serving as first lieutenant and damage control assistant. Follow-on service at sea included operations officer aboard USS Jarrett (FFG 33), participating in Operation Desert Storm; operations officer aboard USS Gridley (CG 21), participating in the establishment of Operation Southern Watch over Southern Iraq; and executive officer aboard USS Antietam (CG 54). Assignments ashore include duty at Naval Education and Training Center, Newport, Rhode Island, as seamanship instructor and service as aide to the naval inspector general, Washington, D.C. Duties in Naples, Italy, as deputy executive assistant to Commander in Chief, Allied Forces, Southern Europe/Commander in Chief, U.S. Naval Forces, Europe, included service in support of the Joint Forces Commander, Operation Allied Force and Commander, Joint Task Force Noble Anvil during NATO’s operations in Kosovo. Additionally, he served a tour at the United States Naval Academy as 4th Battalion officer and Plebe Summer officer in charge. He has commanded USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), Naval Base San Diego, Navy Region Hawaii, Naval Surface Group Middle Pacific, Navy Region Southwest, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic and Navy Installations Command.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia ) United States of America
    Case 1:10-cv-01109-RBW Document 1 Filed 06/30/10 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. ) NOAH RUDOLPH ) FILED UNDER SEAL 10018 Wards Grove Circle ) Burke, VA 22015 ) ) ANDREA FORD ) 1832 Rein Lane ) Virginia Beach, VA 23456 ) Civil Action ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES ) JURY TRIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, ) DEMANDED Suite 504 ) The Chambers ) Chelsea Harbour ) London, SW10 OXF United Kingdom ) ) ISS MARINE SERVICES, INC., ) DBA Inchcape Shipping Services, Inc. ) 11 N. Water Street ) Mobile, AL 36602 ) ) INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES S.A. ) Ricardo J. Alfaro Avenue ) Edison Tower, 14th Floor ) PO Box 0823-05456 ) Panama City, REPUBLIC OF PANAMA ) ) INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES, ) MILME SERVICIOS ) MARITIMOS S.A., DBA ) INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES ) Av Saenz Pena 177, 7th floor ) Callao, Lima, Peru ) ) INCHCAPE SHIPPING SERVICES ) DUBAI LLC ) 3rd Floor, Legend Headquarters ) Opposite Global Village, ) Emirates Road, Dubailand ) Case 1:10-cv-01109-RBW Document 1 Filed 06/30/10 Page 2 of 45 P.O. Box 33166 ) Dubai, United Arab Emirates ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) COMPLAINT Defendant Inchcape Shipping Services Holdings Limited, a marine services provider headquartered in the United Kingdom, and its subsidiaries (collectively “ISS”), provide support and logistic services known as “husbanding services” to ships, including U.S. Navy, Coast Guard, Military Sealift Command, and other U.S. ships making port calls in U.S. and foreign ports. This complaint alleges that ISS has defrauded the United States and violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., by overbilling the U. S. Navy and falsifying invoices for husbanding services provided to Navy and other U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Supply Corps
    SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2017 SUPPOs Supplying the Fight A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps Recognizing the central importance of supply to establishing the Navy, President George Washington laid the foundation for the U.S. Navy Supply Corps in 1775 with the appointment of Tench Francis, a Philadelphia businessman, as the country’s first Purveyor of Public Supplies. Francis provided vital support to the first Navy ships, and started our tradition of selfless service. The Navy’s trusted providers of supplies, our supply officers (SUPPOs) keep operations running smoothly to support the mission. But they can’t do it alone. Working as a team with their skilled and experienced enlisted members, our SUPPOs are experts in our field who know inventory and financial management, food, retail, postal operations, and disbursing management. They are leaders and problem solvers who tackle complex challenges to implement effective and efficient management solutions, ensuring our customers’ needs are met. To be “Ready for Sea,” we must be professionally ready with the skills to operate in all our lines of operation. We also need character readiness, demonstrated by our integrity, accountabili- ty, initiative, and toughness. Lastly, we need to be individually ready; to be fit, healthy, and ready to meet the demands of the fight. This issue provides insights from our SUPPOs’ important work as they meet the unique needs of their various commands. Like the pursuers and paymasters who have gone before, SUPPOs uphold our rich heritage, and embrace their responsibilities to support the warfighter with a servant’s heart. Our SUPPO’s success depends on their character and competence, knowledge of the shore infrastructure, relationships with our professional civilian workforce, and on the enlisted members they lead and serve with.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Help Guide
    TEACHER HELP GUIDE LESSON PLAN: The Nuclear Umbrella – Still Here After the Cold War DEVELOPED BY: John Clark, science teacher and military historian, Deltona High School, Deltona, FL 2012 Naval Historical Foundation STEM-H Teacher Fellowship INSTRUCTIONAL GOAL: (history) The Cold War period is required study under the educational standards of many states. This lesson offers an original way to cover that period in American history and potentially raise student achievement through its uniqueness. BACKGROUND: The Cold War is officially over but the threat from the evolution of nuclear weapons that created that war remains and is growing. Students need to understand that an attack on the United States by a nuclear weapon is still a very real possibility. Make the Cold War come alive for your students by using the resources and web site of the Cold War Gallery at the Naval Museum in Washington, D.C. to educate today’s students about the realities of living under a nuclear umbrella. Focusing on the role of the Navy during this long and tense 45 year period is a great way to build student interest in learning about an important chapter in recent American history. Students will gain a perspective of how living under the nuclear umbrella has evolved to present day. Our future citizens need to internalize the continuing dangers and the threat to American life evolving from the spread of nuclear weapons around the globe. If you cannot come to the museum you can use its resources by taking your students on a virtual tour of the gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Friction and the Transformation of US Naval Forces in the 21St Century
    The Return of Friction and the Transformation of US Naval Forces in the 21st Century Aaron Scholer Department of Government Georgetown University Washington, D.C. ABSTRACT In the decades which have followed the end of the Cold War, the US military has hesitantly explored the transformation of its forces. Uncertain as to what it should transform into, it is equally unsure as to how it should go about the process of transformation, let alone why it should transform in the first place. Fiscal constraints have driven some transformation, a commonsensical realization that t he perceived enemy has changed has introduced more, and technological discoveries have prompted still more transformation; yet the military of the 21st century is set to be only incrementally evolved from its late 20th century parent. In no other service is this début-de-siècle structural uncertainty as apparent as in the US Navy- lashed as it is to the concept of the super-carrier until well into the mid-21st century. This paper explores the transformation of a segment of the US Navy not purely as a reaction to newly available technology and the like, but as a response to a new appreciation of the maritime battlespace: an appreciation driven by the still-unfolding theoretical fruits of the Revolution in Military Affairs. This transformed force, a naval swarm, will not only be a viable option for both ‘blue’ and ‘green/brown’ water battlespace dominance, but will also be a first step in learning how to operate within a chaotic battlespace rich in what Carl von Clausewitz termed “friction.” INTRODUCTION The US military is in the midst of a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) and it is a revolution that will ultimately deliver unheard of precision, firepower and command and control capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Todd Shipyards Collection Finding
    1 Los Angeles Maritime Museum Collection #69 Todd Shipyards Corporation, the Los Angeles Division Collection Compiled by Los Angeles Maritime Museum Research Library Processed By, Date: Madeline Morehouse, March 2015 Title: Todd Shipyards Corporation, the Los Angeles Division Collection Dates: 1917-1989 (bulk 1976 - 1989) Extent: 9.5 cu. feet: 10 boxes. 85 engineering drawings, average size 25 x 35 inches. Format: Photographic prints, photographic slides and negatives, printed programs and papers, engineering drawings and maps. Creator: Todd Shipyards Corporation Abstract: Todd Shipyards Corporation, the Los Angeles Division Collection consists of photographs, engineering drawings, photographic slides and negatives, and papers related to the company and its involvement in shipbuilding. The bulk of photographs are of specific ships and Navy vessels that Todd repaired or built in the port of Los Angeles. Access Restrictions: Prior Arrangement with the Library for all materials. Use Restrictions: Copyright restrictions apply to this collection: Please see Librarian. Catalog Record: Todd Shipyards Corporation, the Los Angeles Division Collection Provenance: Material was in possession of Todd Shipyards Corporation until 1990. Scope and Content Note: The collection contains photographs, engineering drawings, and papers acquired from the Todd Shipyards Corporation, Los Angeles Division. The bulk of the collection is of photographs taken of ships and shipbuilding. There are also photographs of Todd employees and departments, facilities and grounds, and damage and repairs made on ships and grounds. There are papers related to the company’s photography business transactions such as correspondence, invoices, and photographer contracts. The collection also has 80 engineering drawings and plans dating back to 1917 when the Los Angeles Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Corp was still operating.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Close Relationships with Allies Is a Force Multiplier An
    SURFACE SITREP Page 1 P PPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPP PP PPP PPPPPPP PPPP PPPPPPPPPP Volume XXXI, Number 1 April 2015 Forging Close Relationships with Allies is a Force Multiplier An Interview with Admiral Mark Ferguson, USN Commander, Allied Joint Force Command, Naples; Commander US Naval Forces, Europe and Commander, US Naval Forces, Africa Conducted by CAPT Edward Lundquist, USN (Ret) Can you share with us the headquarters that is your synopsis of the certified for that year is major challenges that the one that steps up and face you today in your serves as the operational job as Commander of commander. Naval Forces Europe and Africa? I would imagine that My position is unique in force would be prepared that I wear three hats. and certify that year for First, I’m Commander of what the anticipated Joint Force Command, threat would be. Naples, under NATO. I In November, we have an 800 person staff conducted a very large based in Lago Patria. We exercise called Trident are an operational level Juncture 15. Our air headquarters and I’m the component commander current NATO Response was a French General Force Commander for based in Lyon, the the year. I am also the maritime component Operational Commander commander was Spanish, for NATO Forces in NAPLES, Italy (March 6, 2015) Adm. Mark Ferguson, commander of U.S. Naval the Special Forces were Kosovo, numbering Forces Europe-Africa, delivers closing remarks at the 2015 Combined Force Maritime Polish, and the land about 4,500 troops. That Component Commander (CFMCC) Flag Course Africa at Naval Support Activity component was the consumes a lot of my time Naples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tanker War Mission and Vision Proceedings Magazine
    Now in your cart (0 items) - Cart Total: $0.00 Log In Become a Member Looking To Renew Your Membership? About Membership News Room Content Books Conferences Archives Photos Donate Home » Magazines » Proceedings Magazine - May 1988 Vol. 114/5/1,023 The Tanker War Mission and Vision Proceedings Magazine 0 0 0 0 Naval History Magazine By Ronald O'Rourke USNI Blog The Iran-Iraq War, which began in September 1980, now ranks as one of the longer interstate conflicts of the 20th Naval History Blog century. In a strict military sense, it has been primarily a land The Naval Wiki conflict. Compared with the often bloody fighting on land, where an uneasy stalemate has developed, the "tanker war" in the waters of the Gulf has been a mere sideshow . The Essay Contests tanker war, however, has attracted considerable international interest because it has involved the shipping of many Publishing Information countries. It is seen as having the potential both to affect world oil exports and prices, and to draw other countries into the conflict. Submissions The tanker war is a campaign of economic attrition and political intimidation. Iraq attacks ships serving Iranian ports— largely to reduce Iran's oil exports, which go entirely by sea and which help finance Iran's war effort. Because Iran destroyed Advertising Iraq's oilterminal early in the war, no tankers steam to or from Iraq, and Iraq's oil exports now travel by overland pipeline. Search Archives Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, however, support Iraq's war effort. Iran thus wages its own war on shipping serving the Arab side of the Gulf to reduce Iraq's imports of war material, and to intimidate the Gulf states supporting Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy Vol 72 No 4 Oct 2010
    OCT-DEC 2010 VOL 72 No4 AMPHIBIOUS CLOSE AIR SUPPORT THE CANBERRA CLASS LHDs CARRIER-BORNE CLOSE AIR SUPPORT HISTORY CLOSE AIR SUPPORT -THE NAVAL AVIATION AN ORGANIC FIXED WING CAPABILITY FOR AUSTRALIA’S LHDs $5.95 AUSTRALIA’S LEADING NAVAL MAGAZINE SINCE 1938 INCL. GST The Anzac class frigate HMAS PERTH sporting her new active phased array ASMD (Anti-Ship Missile Defence) radar mast while still undergoing upgrade. Trials are expected early next year. (Ian Johnson) The former HMAS VAMPIRE being towed down Sydney Harbour to her home at the National Maritime Museum after routine maintenance at Garden Island. (Chris Sattler, 14 July 2010) Volume 72 No.4 THE MAGAZINE OF THE NAVY LEAGUE OF AUSTRALIA FFEDERALEDERAL CCOUNCILOUNCIL SSOUTHOUTH AAUSTRALIANUSTRALIAN DDIVISIONIVISION Patron in Chief: Her Excellency, Patron: His Excellency, The Governor General. The Governor of South Australia. President: Graham M Harris, RFD. President: Dean Watson, RFD. Vice-Presidents: Rear Admiral A.J. Hon. Secretary: Miss J E Gill, 05 THE CANBERRA CLASS LHDs Robertson, AO, DSC, RAN (Rtd); Rear PO Box 3008, Unley, SA 5061. Admiral DG Holthouse, AO, RAN (Rtd): Telephone: (08) 8272 6435 Matt Rowe TTASMANIANASMANIAN DDIVISIONIVISION Hon. Secretary: Philip Corboy, Patron: Mr Tony Lee. PO Box 128, Clayfield, Qld 4011. 11 CARRIER BORNE CLOSE AIR Telephone: 1300 739 681, President: Mr Tudor Hardy, Mob: 0421 280 481, 4 Illawarra Road, Perth, Tas 7300. SUPPORT – HISTORICAL Fax: 1300 739 682 Hon. Secretary: Mrs Christene Hardy, Email: [email protected] 4 Illawarra Road, Perth, Tas 7300. PERSPECTIVES NNEWEW SSOUTHOUTH WWALESALES DDIVISIONIVISION State Branch: By CDR David Hobbs MBE, RN (Rtd) Patron: Her Excellency, Launceston: Mr Tudor Hardy, The Governor of New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 437, October 2, 1987
    WfJRIlERS ,I1NI,,1R' No. 437 2 October 1987 War-Crazy Reagan Attacks the Ayatollahs • rl er- a • • In erSlan • Careening from Contragate revela­ tions of.having secretly sold arms to Teheran, the Reagan administration seems hell-bent on provoking war with Iran. Last week, in a brazen act of war, the U.S. attacked and seized an Iranian ship in the Persian Gulf without warn­ ing. To further taunt Khomeini, the Navy scuttled the ship by blowing it up. And war, secretary Weinberger is demanding "a totally different kind of government in Iran." The Reaganauts have delusions they're back in the days of Teddy Roosevelt and his "big stick," that by sailing gunboats up the Gulf they can install another shah. Washington has sucked virtually every European NATO power into its shoot-'em-up adventure on. the Cold War grounds of "keeping the Soviets out" of the Gulf. But by getting mired in the muck of the Iran/Iraq war, Rambo Reagan has shot himself in the groin. Now this pyro­ maniac could light the fuse for World War III. First they sent in a Navy flotilla, dar­ ing Khomeini to respond. But Teheran Duncan/AP didn't bite. So the U.S. used two heli­ Persian Gulf minefield: USS' Jarrett captures Iranian ship. Reagan's provocations are dangerous trip ,wire for copter gunships from a secret high-tech World War III. ._.. Army unit (Task Force 160) to disable the Iranian ship, killing at least three waters used by American ships as an an­ say it was the Rakhsh.
    [Show full text]