The Cherokee Path

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cherokee Path National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ninety Six National Historic Site Ninety Six, South Carolina The Cherokee Path Ninety Six National Historic Site preserves a portion of the Cherokee Path for visitors to enjoy. Follow the blue blazes along the trail. The Cherokee Path was once a direct route for traders and trappers, Native Americans, and settlers, to exchange merchandise between the backcountry and the Carolina coast. The path stretched from the lower Cherokee town ofKeowee (near Clemson, SC) to the Congaree River. The path then forked north to the Catawba Nation and south to Charles Towne (Charleston). The Cherokee Path became increasingly important because of its connection to the developing trade economy in the Carolinas. One merchant, Robert Gouedy, established his trading post at Ninety Six, where he traded goods with the Cherokees. Through archeological research, the Cherokee Path's sunken remains are observed as a reminder of the past. The path connected people through transportation and business which gave way to a stable trade route from the coast to the interior. The once crucial path fell into decay after the slow decline of Cherokee trade and warfare. As a result, the Cherokee Path faded as a landmark except in a few places. Today, you can hike the existing Cherokee Path at Ninety Six just as Native Americans and explorers. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ninety Six National Historic Site Ninety Six, South Carolina Cherokee Path Trail 0 0.2 miles ~I ~=-=1~--~I s The Cherokee Path Trail is 1.5 miles point-to-point and indicated by blue blazes. This woodland trail leads to remnants of the Old Cherokee Path, which ran from the Carolina coast northwest through Ninety Six, to the Cherokee town of Keoweee. .
Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Ethnogenesis in Southwestern North Carolina
    The following chapter is from: The Archaeology of North Carolina: Three Archaeological Symposia Charles R. Ewen – Co-Editor Thomas R. Whyte – Co-Editor R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. – Co-Editor North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication Number 30 2011 Available online at: http://www.rla.unc.edu/NCAC/Publications/NCAC30/index.html CHEROKEE ETHNOGENESIS IN SOUTHWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA Christopher B. Rodning Dozens of Cherokee towns dotted the river valleys of the Appalachian Summit province in southwestern North Carolina during the eighteenth century (Figure 16-1; Dickens 1967, 1978, 1979; Perdue 1998; Persico 1979; Shumate et al. 2005; Smith 1979). What developments led to the formation of these Cherokee towns? Of course, native people had been living in the Appalachian Summit for thousands of years, through the Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Mississippi periods (Dickens 1976; Keel 1976; Purrington 1983; Ward and Davis 1999). What are the archaeological correlates of Cherokee culture, when are they visible archaeologically, and what can archaeology contribute to knowledge of the origins and development of Cherokee culture in southwestern North Carolina? Archaeologists, myself included, have often focused on the characteristics of pottery and other artifacts as clues about the development of Cherokee culture, which is a valid approach, but not the only approach (Dickens 1978, 1979, 1986; Hally 1986; Riggs and Rodning 2002; Rodning 2008; Schroedl 1986a; Wilson and Rodning 2002). In this paper (see also Rodning 2009a, 2010a, 2011b), I focus on the development of Cherokee towns and townhouses. Given the significance of towns and town affiliations to Cherokee identity and landscape during the 1700s (Boulware 2011; Chambers 2010; Smith 1979), I suggest that tracing the development of towns and townhouses helps us understand Cherokee ethnogenesis, more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Whispers from the Past
    Whispers from the Past Overview Native Americans have been inhabitants of South Carolina for more than 15,000 years. These people contributed in countless ways to the state we call home. The students will be introduced to different time periods in the history of Native Americans and then focus on the Cherokee Nation. Connection to the Curriculum Language Arts, Geography, United States History, and South Carolina History South Carolina Social Studies Standards 8-1.1 Summarize the culture, political systems, and daily life of the Native Americans of the Eastern Woodlands, including their methods of hunting and farming, their use of natural resources and geographic features, and their relationships with other nations. 8-1.2 Categorize events according to the ways they improved or worsened relations between Native Americans and European settlers, including alliances and land agreements between the English and the Catawba, Cherokee, and Yemassee; deerskin trading; the Yemassee War; and the Cherokee War. Social Studies Literacy Elements F. Ask geographic questions: Where is it located? Why is it there? What is significant about its location? How is its location related to that of other people, places, and environments? I. Use maps to observe and interpret geographic information and relationships P. Locate, gather, and process information from a variety of primary and secondary sources including maps S. Interpret and synthesize information obtained from a variety of sources—graphs, charts, tables, diagrams, texts, photographs, documents, and interviews Time One to two fifty-minute class periods Materials South Carolina: An Atlas Computer South Carolina Interactive Geography (SCIG) CD-ROM Handouts included with lesson plan South Carolina Highway Map Dry erase marker Objectives 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NINETY SIX to ABOUT YOUR VISIT Ninety Six Was Designated a National Historic National Historic Site • S.C
    NINETY SIX To ABOUT YOUR VISIT Ninety Six was designated a national historic National Historic Site • S.C. site on August 16, 1976. While there Is much archaeological and historical study, planning and INDIANS AND COLONIAL TRAVELERS, A development yet to be done In this new area of CAMPSITE ON THE CHEROKEE PATH the National Park System, we welcome you to Ninety Six and Invite you to enjoy the activities which are now available. FRONTIER SETTLERS, A REGION OF RICH This powder horn is illustrated with the only known LAND, A TRADING CENTER AND A FORT map of Lieutenant Colonel Grant's 1761 campaign The mile-long Interpretive trail takes about FOR PROTECTION AGAINST INDIAN against the Cherokees. Although it is unsigned, the one hour to walk and Includes several strenuous ATTACK elaborate detail and accuracy of the engraving indicate that the powder horn was inscribed by a soldier, grades. The earthworks and archaeological probably an officer, who marched with the expedition. remains here are fragile. Please do not disturb or damage them. RESIDENTS OF THE NINETY SIX DISTRICT, A Grant, leading a force of 2,800 regular and provincial COURTHOUSE AND JAIL FOR THE ADMINI­ troops, marched from Charlestown northwestward along The site abounds In animal and plant life, STRATION OF JUSTICE the Cherokee Path to attack the Indian towns. An including poisonous snakes, poison oak and Ivy. advanced supply base was established at Ninety Six. We suggest that you stay on the trail. The Grant campaign destroyed 15 villages in June and July, 1761. This operation forced the Cherokees to sue The Ninety Six National Historic Site Is located PATRIOTS AND LOYALISTS IN THE REVOLU­ for peace, thus ending the French and Indian War on the on Highway S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Genealogy Research Websites Note: Look for the Genweb and Genealogy Trails of the County in Which Your Ancestor Lived
    Genealogy Research in Georgia Early Native Americans in Georgia Native inhabitants of the area that is now Georgia included: *The Apalachee Indians *The Cherokee Indians *The Hitchiti, Oconee and Miccosukee Indians *The Muskogee Creek Indians *The Timucua Indians *The Yamasee and Guale Indians In the late 1700’s and early 1800’s, most of these tribes were forced to cede their land to the U.S. government. The members of the tribes were “removed” to federal reservations in the western U.S. In the late 1830’s, remaining members of the Cherokee tribes were forced to move to Oklahoma in what has become known as the “Trail of Tears.” Read more information about Native Americans of Georgia: http://www.native-languages.org/georgia.htm http://www.ourgeorgiahistory.com/indians/ http://www.aboutnorthgeorgia.com/ang/American_Indians_of_Georgia Some native people remained in hiding in Georgia. Today, the State of Georgia recognizes the three organizations of descendants of these people: The Cherokee Indians of Georgia: PO Box 337 St. George, GA 31646 The Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee: PO Box 1993, Dahlonega, Georgia 30533 or PO Box 1915, Cumming, GA 30028 http://www.georgiatribeofeasterncherokee.com/ The Lower Muscogee Creek Tribe: Rte 2, PO Box 370 Whigham, GA 31797 First People - Links to State Recognized Tribes, sorted by state - http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Links/state- recognized-tribes-in-usa-by-state.html European Settlement of Georgia Photo at left shows James Oglethorpe landing in what is now called Georgia 1732: King George II of England granted a charter to James Oglethorpe for the colony of Georgia to be a place of refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cherokee Path
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ninety Six National Historic Site Ninety Six, South Carolina The Cherokee Path Ninety Six National Historic Site preserves a portion of the Cherokee Path for visitors to enjoy. ll h bl bl l h l The Cherokee Path was once a direct route for traders and trappers, Native Americans, and settlers too exchanged merchandise between the backcountry and the Carolina coast. The path stretched from the lower Cherokee town of Keowee (near Clemson, SC) to the Congaree River. The path then forked north to the Catawba Nation and south to Charles Towne (Charleston). The Cherokee Path became increasingly important because of its connection to the developing trade economy in the Carolinas. One merchant, Robert Gouedy, established his trading post at Ninety Six, where he traded goods with the Cherokees. Through archeological research, the Cherokee Path’s sunken remains are observed as a reminder of the past. The path connected people through transportation and business which gave way to a stable trade route from the coast to the interior. The once crucial path fell into decay after the slow decline of Cherokee trade and warfare. As a result, the Cherokee Path faded as a landmark except in a few places. Today, you can hike the existing Cherokee Path at Ninety Six just as Native Americans and explorers did. National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ninety Six National Historic Site Ninety Six, South Carolina The Cherokee Path Cherokee Path Trail The Cherokee Path Trail is 1.5 miles point-to-point and indicated by blue blazes.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Platform Mounds and Townhouses in the Cherokee Heartland: a Collaborative Approach
    REVISITING PLATFORM MOUNDS AND TOWNHOUSES IN THE CHEROKEE HEARTLAND: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH BENJAMIN A. STEERE Department of Anthropology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC, USA This article describes the development and initial results of the Western North Carolina Mounds and Towns Project, a collaborative endeavor initiated by the Tribal Historic Preservation Office of the Eastern Band of Cherokee and the Coweeta Long Term Ecological Research Program at the University of Georgia. The goal of this project is to generate new information about the distribution of late prehistoric mounds and historic period townhouses in western North Carolina. This ongoing research has produced updated location and chronological data for Mis- sissippian period mounds and historic Cherokee townhouses, and led to the discovery of a possible location for the Jasper Allen mound. Using these new data, I suggest that David Hally’s model for the territorial size of Mississip- pian polities provides a useful framework for generating new research questions about social and political change in western North Carolina. I also posit that the cultural practice of rebuilding townhouses in place and on top of Mis- sissippian period platform mounds, a process that Christopher Rodning describes as “emplacement,” was common across western North Carolina. In terms of broader impacts, this project contributes positively to the development of indigenous archaeology in the Cherokee heartland. KEYWORDS: Cherokee Archaeology, Regional Analysis, Indigenous Archaeology, Townhouses, Mounds Prior to the late nineteenth century, the mountain is not incorporated into broader research frame- valleys of western North Carolina were marked by works (e.g., Riggs and Shumate [] on the dozens of platform mounds and townhouses built Kituwah Mound and Benyshek et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory Kings Mountain National Military Park
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2010 Kings Mountain National Military Park Kings Mountain National Military Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Kings Mountain National Military Park Kings Mountain National Military Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1974 The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas Richard George Remer College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Remer, Richard George, "The Great Wagon Road of the Carolinas" (1974). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624870. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-w0y7-0655 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GREAT WAGON ROAD OF THE CAROLIRAS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Richard George Reiner 1974 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts HcUU 'Author Approved, August 1974 / f ? > O Q Richard Maxwell Brown . - „ v Edward M. Riley/ James Thompson sos^s TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................... iv LIST OF M A P S ........................................... v ABSTRACT ............................................... vi INTRODUCTION ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Archaeology of Catawba Itinerancy Mark Russell Plane A
    A Historical Archaeology of Catawba Itinerancy Mark Russell Plane A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology. Chapel Hill 2011 Approved by: Vincas Steponaitis Brett Riggs R. P. Stephen Davis C. Margaret Scarry Silvia Tomaskova © 2011 Mark Russell Plane ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT MARK RUSSELL PLANE: A Historical Archaeology of Catawba Itinerancy (Under the direction of Vincas Steponaitis) During the late eighteenth century, Catawba Indians in South Carolina experienced dramatic population loss, a shifting colonial economy, and a rapid influx of European settlers into their territory. Although Catawbas had long been clients and allies of the colonial government, with the end of the deerskin trade and their role in colonial-era warfare they were forced to seek new survival strategies. Sometime in the 1760s, Catawbas began leasing reservation land to Anglo settlers and working as itinerant potters and slave catchers. Traveling seasonally from their backcountry home to the seaboard, Catawbas marketed their goods and services in towns and on plantations across South Carolina for over seventy years. This study provides anthropological perspectives on Catawba itinerancy, examining the socio-economics of itinerancy and the Catawba’s relationships with their host society, especially their use of patron-client relationships to maintain their land base. Archaeological perspectives include evidence of the impact of itinerancy on Catawba economy, architecture, and material culture, particularly material remains related to identity construction. While European observers tended to view itinerant Catawbas on their home base in terms of negative stereotypes such as indolence and poverty, when traveling, Catawbas were viewed in terms of romantic savagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane
    Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane Jessica Leann Cook Los Angeles, California. Bachelor of Arts in History, University of California, 2009 A thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Virginia May, 2017 1 Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane Jessica L. Cook Note: Maps for this essay are available online at http://www.viseyes.org/mapscholar/?1635. On February 1, 1760, after eighteen months of rising tensions between Cherokee peoples and British colonists, a contingent of Cherokee warriors attacked a convoy of fleeing British settlers near Long Cane Creek in northwestern South Carolina. Later named "The Long Canes Massacre” by Anglo-Americans, the deadly ambush made front page news throughout the colony and precipitated two devastating British military campaigns into Cherokee homelands. Over the last eighty years, scholars have considered the attack at Long Cane Creek only as a narrative event and have used it to illustrate rising tensions in their broader studies of the region's history. As a result, academic understanding of Long Canes' significance has changed very little since the nineteenth century. Current scholarship argues that area border disputes and the massacre occurred because of “illegal” settlement beyond a boundary line negotiated in 1747. This interpretation, however, assumes that the 1747 boundary was legitimate, that British officials, settlers, and the Cherokee knew and agreed on its precise location, and that average Cherokee people understood the treaty's terms enough to recognize and become angered by boundary violations.1 1 In his detailed geographical study of the Southern Indian Boundary formation, Louis DeVorsey used the term ‘illegal’ to summarize the contents of an August 1758 Cherokee letter to the governor of Georgia requesting help removing white settlers from area hunting grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Historical Markers by Time Period
    South Carolina Historical Markers This list of historical markers is divided into the time periods as written in the South Carolina Social Studies Standards. Each time period lists the name of the historical marker, organized alphabetically by county. To read the full text of the historical marker, visit the South Carolina Historical Markers database at: http://www.scaet.org/markers/. South Carolina has over 1,400 historical markers, and new markers are added to this list twice a year. Colonial (Precontact-1763): Boonesborough Township (1763) (Abbeville) Broom Hall Plantation (Berkeley) Long Cane Cemetery (Abbeville) Crowfield Plantation (Berkeley) Savannah Town/Fort Moore (Aiken) Early Indian Trading Paths/The Goose Creek Silver Bluff Baptist Church (Aiken) Men (Berkeley) Beaufort (Beaufort) Goose Creek Bridge (Berkeley) Chapel of Ease (Beaufort) The Yamasee War at Goose Creek (1715) Ruins of Old Sheldon/Prince William’s Parish (Berkeley) Church (Beaufort) Berkeley County (Berkeley) Hilton Head (Beaufort) Medway (Berkeley) Pinckney Island (Beaufort) French Huguenot Plantation (Berkeley) St. Helena’s Church (Beaufort) First Land Granted in Calhoun County Area Old Monck’s Corner (Berkeley) (Calhoun) Mulberry Plantation (Berkeley) St. Matthew’s Lutheran Church/Parent Goose Creek Church (Berkeley) Lutheran Church of this Area (Calhoun) Biggin Church (Berkeley) Savany Hunt (Calhoun) Pompion Hill Chapel (Berkeley) Old Wappetaw Church (Charleston) St. Thomas Church (Berkeley) St. Paul’s, Stono/St. Paul’s Churchyard (Charleston) Old Jamestown
    [Show full text]
  • Walking in the Footsteps of the Indians - Locating and Documenting Indian Cultural Heritage Sites Chapter 1
    Walking in the Footsteps of the Indians - Locating and Documenting Indian Cultural Heritage Sites Chapter 1 Anthropologists estimate that before any Europeans came to North American there were between 3 and 5 million indigenous peoples scattered across what is today the continental US. Although often referred to as savages or uneducated peoples, the Native Americans were in fact very knowledgeable. They lived in harmony with the earth. They had an established transportation system that provided communications, commerce, and travel for 1,000’s of miles in any direction. Today, many of our main highways and railroads are built on top of these old paths. Using old maps, surveyor notes, personal journals, government records, and “boots on the ground” hikes to research these old trails is a fascinating way to spend time. One can learn not only about the physical route of the trail but also about life as it was lived along it. Searching for and Documenting Indian Marker Trees In 2003, the Mountain Stewards began doing research on Indian Marker Trees; but, it was not until 2007 that a full scale effort was undertaken to document these “Living Artifacts.” The Mountain Stewards first discovered these oddly shaped trees while mapping hiking trails in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of Dawson and Pickens County, GA. At that time, our knowledge about this part of Indian culture was sadly lacking. Because these trees were in an area previously occupied by Cherokees, we thought that they were related only to the Cherokees. Elaine Jordan’s book, Indian Trail Trees, published in 1997, taught us that these trees were found in other parts of the country as well.
    [Show full text]