1 a Historical Constructivist Perspective of Japan's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 a Historical Constructivist Perspective of Japan's A Historical Constructivist Perspective of Japan’s Environmental Diplomacy Katsuhiko Mori International Christian University Abstract: Why did Japan attempt to take a leadership role on some occasions, while it became a bystander or even a dragger on other occasions? By examining three cases of environmental diplomacy, i.e., hosting the Kyoto conference on climate change, the Nagoya conference on biodiversity, and the diplomatic conference for the Minamata Convention, this paper will identify the key drivers of effectiveness in Japan’s environmental diplomacy from the perspective of historical constructivism. The study accounts for the historical trajectory and conjunctures of Japan’s environmental diplomacy in the changing global environmental governance with a combination of power, interests, and ideas across time and areas of concern at both international and domestic levels. Introduction Why did Japan attempt to take a leadership role on some occasions, while it became a bystander or even a dragger on other occasions? In the 1980s, Japan was accused of being one of the world’s “eco-outlaws,” especially regarding the tropical timber, whaling, and ivory trades.1 Since the 1990s, Japan has become more active in hosting multilateral environmental conferences, such as the 1997 Third Session of the Conference of Parties (COP-3) of the United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the 2010 COP-10, the fifth Meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (MOP-5) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the 2013 Diplomatic Conference for the Minamata Convention on Mercury. These conferences were concerned with the atmosphere, biosphere, and hydrosphere, which were on the diplomatic agenda in the 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s, respectively. On the one hand, these conferences appear to be symbolic signals of Japan’s environmental diplomacy, especially by adopting the protocols and conventions using the names of the Japanese host cities: Kyoto, Nagoya, and Minamata.2 However, there is a difference between hosting these conferences and contributing to the conference 1 outcomes. Japan lost credibility and the opportunity to take environmental leadership by deciding not to participate in the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, and by having not ratified the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing (ABS) and the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. On the other hand, Japan ratified the Minamata Convention relatively early, before it will enter into force. What are the key driving forces of effectiveness in Japan’s environmental diplomacy? This paper will answer this question from the perspective of historical constructivism. The next section will establish a framework of analysis for the historical trajectory of Japan’s environmental diplomacy. The following sections will account for the three cases of environmental diplomacy in deconstructing and reconstructing the changing global environmental governance with a combination of power, interests, and ideas across time and areas of concern. A Comprehensive Analysis Framework Historical Trajectory of Japan’s Environmental Diplomacy To what extent was Japan’s environmental diplomacy successful or not successful in which areas of environmental concern? To answer this question, it is first important to identify the historical trajectory and conjunctures of Japan’s symbolic environmental diplomatic actions, such as hosting conferences for multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), inviting international organization headquarters to Japan, hosting summitry meetings, and committing and disbursing environmental official development assistance (ODA). Japan’s environmental diplomatic actions are varied, with different conjunctures in different environmental issues, such as the atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere, and hydrosphere. As shown in Table 1, the history of international environmental governance can be roughly periodized using the UN environmental summits as thresholds, although there were some early attempts, such as the International Whaling Commission (IWC) and the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, before the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment (UNCHE) held in Stockholm. A salient feature of the main issues that the 1972 Stockholm conference dealt with was the “internationalization” of environmental pollution issues or transboundary 2 environmental pollution. At that time, Japan was preoccupied with domestic environmental pollution and there were no transboundary environmental issues. The Diet session held in late 1970 was called the “Pollution Diet,” which discussed a series of environmental pollution-related legislation and established the Environment Agency in 1971. Compared with Sweden and Canada, Japan’s environmental diplomacy was premature. Japan joined the MEAs created in the 1970s many years later. Japan entered the World Heritage Convention (WHC) in 1992, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in 1980, and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) in 1983. Currently, Japan is not under the geographical coverage of the Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) Convention, and Japan is not a member of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (the Bonn Convention). Stockholm was a starting point of Japan’s environmental diplomacy. A Japanese diplomat had the idea of hosting a second UNCHE for further learning. In reality, Deputy Prime Minister Takeo Miki officially expressed such an idea to the UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim, but it was not realized.3 The session of a special character of the Governing Council of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) was held in Nairobi in 1982. The Nairobi conference was characterized as “worldization” in the sense that the socioeconomic dimension of the North–South problems became the main agenda. Rather than human (social) and environmental pillars, economic development was the main concern for developing countries. In 1982, Japan responded to this demand by proposing the establishment of a World Commission on Environment and Development to UNEP. Japan also hosted the first World Lake Conference in 1984. Japan also increased its ODA rapidly in the middle of the 1980s and became the world’s largest donor in 1989. Japan joined the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer in 1988 and the Montreal Protocol in 1989, although Japan was a dragger in the early phases of the ozone negotiations. Japan was the world’s largest timber importer, and its responsibility for deforestation was seriously criticized by the early 1980s. Japan invited the headquarters of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) to Yokohama in 1986. The negotiations on the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 3 (UNCLOS) also faced difficulties due to the North–South divide. Japan joined the Basel Convention in 1993 and the UNCLOS in 1996. A dominant idea of the 1992 Rio conference is characterized as the “globalization” of environmental issues, as symbolized by the emphasis on the “common” element of the principle of common but differentiated responsibility, which was applied to all three Rio conventions on climate change, biodiversity, and desertification. Japan played some intermediate roles by hosting the Kyoto conferences on CITES in 1992, and on climate change in 1997, and playing a mediator role in adopting the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety in 2000.4 The UN Commission on Sustainable Development established by the Rio summit became a forum to create the Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions related to hazardous materials. Instead of socioeconomic world trade, toxic chemicals were recognized as a “global” environment issue, in the sense of global distillation, or the “grasshopper” effect, by which persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are vaporized at high temperatures and blow around on winds and travel to cooler places in the Arctic and high-altitude areas in the global climate process. At the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg, the three pillars of environment, economy, and society were reconfirmed and public–private partnerships of multiple stakeholders were widely recognized. Japan hosted the third World Water Forum in 2003. Japan’s environmental diplomacy seemed revitalized when the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) swept the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in a landslide in the August 2009 general election. At the UN General Assembly in September 2009, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama pledged a 25% reduction in greenhouse gases below 1990 levels by 2020 leading up to the 2009 Copenhagen conference, and expressed in May 2010 the idea of hosting the diplomatic conference for the Minamata Convention on Mercury. However, after Copenhagen talks failed, Japan decided not to join the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol in 2010. Japan also hosted the COP-10 of CBD, where the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, the Nagoya Protocol, and the Nagoya–Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol were adopted. However, Japan has not yet ratified these Protocols. At the 2012 Rio+20, new diplomacy for sustainable development began. After Japan experienced the triple disaster of earthquakes, tsunami, and nuclear meltdown in 2011, voters gave
Recommended publications
  • “East Asia Low Carbon Growth Dialogue”
    UN CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE “East Asia Low Carbon Growth Dialogue” Ministry of Foreign Affairs Japan (MOFA), Ministry of the Environment Japan (MOEJ), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) & University of Technology Malaysia (UTM) DATE 7 DECEMBER 2015 (MON) TIME 18:30PM – 20:00PM VENUE Observer Room 04 The East Asia Summit (EAS) region is described as the global growth center and the area where emits GHG the most. Stakeholders will discuss concrete steps to realize low carbon development through promotion of public private partnership and introduction of environmental technologies. Time Agenda 18: 30 – 18:40 Opening Remarks H. E. Tamayo Marukawa, Minister of the Environment, Japan Welcome Remarks Prof. Hironori Hamanaka, Chair of the Board of Directors, IGES 18:40 – 18:45 Key note presentation “Achievement of East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership” Ambassador Masahiko Horie, MOFA 18:45 – 19:55 Sharing Best Practices - NAMA/MRV framework in Vietnam Dr. Luong Quang Huy, Director, DMHCC/MONRE Vietnam - Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) in Cambodia Mr. Sum Thy, Director, MoE Cambodia - Implementation of the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) in Asia Mr. Kazuhisa Koakutsu, Area Leader, IGES - Putrajaya Building Sector Carbon Emissions Monitoring & Reporting Program& PGC2025 updates Datuk Haji Hasim Bin Haji Ismail, President of Putrajaya Corporation, Malaysia Way Forward (1) National planning and city actions (2) Role of non-governmental organizations Panelist: Ambassador Masahiko Horie (MOFA), Mr. Kentaro Tamura (IGES), Prof. Ho Chin Siong (UTM), Dr. Dr. Luong Quang Huy (Vietnam), Mr. Sum Thy (Cambodia) 19:55 – 20:00 Closing Remarks Datuk Ismail Ibrahim, Chief Executive, Iskandar Regional Development Authority (IRDA) Moderator: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Scbd/Sttm/Rh/Km
    Ref: SCBD/OES/AD/DC/74579 20 December 2010 N O T I F I C A T I O N Report of the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Dear Madam/Sir, I am pleased to inform you that the final report of the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties is now available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-10/official/cop-10-27-en.pdf. Thank you for your cooperation and your continued support for the work of the Convention. Please accept, Madam/Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration. Ahmed Djoghlaf Executive Secretary Attachment To: CBD National Focal Points, other governments, and relevant organizations Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity United Nations Environment Programme 413 Saint-Jacques Street, Suite 800, Montreal, QC, H2Y 1N9, Canada Tel : +1 514 288 2220, Fax : +1 514 288 6588 [email protected] www.cbd.int CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27 19 December 2010 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Tenth meeting Nagoya, Japan, 18–29 October 2010 REPORT OF THE TENTH MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 I. ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS ...................................................................................... 7 ITEM 1.1 Opening of the meeting ....................................................................................................... 7 1.1.1 Opening address by Mr. Jochen Flasbarth, on behalf of the President of the Conference of the Parties at its ninth meeting ............................................. 7 1.1.2 Opening address by Mr. Ryu Matsumoto, Minister of the Environment of Japan and President of the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After the Earthquake Hit, the Governor of Iwate Prefecture Requested the Dispatch of Ground Self-Defense Force (SDF) Troops to Assist in Disaster Relief
    & Gijs Berends (eds) Berends & Gijs Al-Badri Dominic AFTER THE How has Japan responded to the March 2011 disaster? What changes have been made in key domestic policy areas? GREAT EaST JAPAN The triple disaster that struck Japan in March 2011 began with the most powerful earthquake known to have hit Japan and led to tsunami reaching 40 meters in height that GREAFTER THE EaRTHQUAKE devastated a wide area and caused thousands of deaths. The ensuing accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power POLITICAL AND POLICY CHANGE plant was Japan’s worst and only second to Chernobyl in its IN POST-FUKUSHIMA JAPAN severity. But has this triple disaster also changed Japan? Has it led to a transformation of the country, a shift in how Japan functions? This book, with fresh perspectives on extra- Edited by ordinary events written by diplomats and policy experts at European embassies to Japan, explores subsequent shifts A Dominic Al-Badri and Gijs Berends in Japanese politics and policy-making to see if profound T changes have occurred or if instead these changes have been Ea limited. The book addresses those policy areas most likely to be affected by the tragedy – politics, economics, energy, J ST climate, agriculture and food safety – describes how the sector has been affected and considers what the implications A are for the future. P A N N Ea RTHQU A KE www.niaspress.dk Al-Badri-Berends_cover.indd 1 12/02/2013 14:12 AFTER THE GREAT EaST JAPAN EaRTHQUAKE Al-Badri-Berends_book.indd 1 12/02/2013 14:29 ASIA INSIGHTS A series aimed at increasing an understanding of contemporary Asia among policy-makers, NGOs, businesses, journalists and other members of the general public as well as scholars and students.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Descrippon About Childhood Thyroid Cancer in UNSCEAR White
    1 Workshop on the occasion of Dr. Mar-n Tondel vising Osaka /20 On the descrip-on about childhood thyroid cancer in UNSCEAR White Paper 2016 Tomoya Yamauchi Graduate School of Mari-me Sciences, Kobe Univreisty 21st April 2019 Shin-Osaka Maru-biru Bekkan, 5-3 On the descrip-on of childhood thyroid Cancer in UNSCEAR White Paper 2016 2/20 Focusing on two paragraphs of 111 & 112 in UNSEAR 2016 White Paper, we examine by what way they deny the analy-cal result of the excess of childhood thyroid cancer in Fukushima Prefecture based on the conven-onal epidemiology. As the report style, these paragraph is completely out of usual scien-fic manner. They have never adequate knowledge about epidemiology, especially on the role of regional classificaon as an operaon variable, an importance of external comparison based on ordinal incidence, and -me interval aer the exposure. The main paper in the present discussion is that published by Tsuda et al. in Epidemiology in 2016. ORIGINAL ARTICLE 5IZSPJE$BODFS%FUFDUJPOCZ6MUSBTPVOE"NPOH 3FTJEFOUT"HFT:FBSTBOE:PVOHFSJO'VLVTIJNB +BQBOUP Toshihide Tsuda,a Akiko Tokinobu,b Eiji Yamamoto,c and Etsuji Suzukib the assumption that the rest of examinees were disease free, an incidence Background: After the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami ORIGINAL ARTICLE rate ratio of 12 has already been observed (95% CI = 5.1, 23). in March 2011, radioactive elements were released from the Fuku- Conclusions: An excess of thyroid cancer has been detected by shima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Based on prior knowledge, con- ultrasound among children and adolescents in Fukushima Prefecture cern emerged about whether an increased incidence of thyroid cancer within 4 years of the release, and is unlikely to be explained by a among exposed residents would occur as a result.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents President’s Message .......................................................................................................................................5 40 Years of JCIE .................................................................................................................................................8 JCIE Activities: April 2009–March 2011 ..................................................................................................... 12 Global ThinkNet: Policy Research and Dialogue 15 Policy Studies and Dialogue .................................................................................................................... 16 Asia Pacific Agenda Project Growing Asia Pacific Regionalism and New Opportunities to Advance Nontraditional Security Cooperation The Impact of Changing US Policy on the Emerging East Asia Community 15th APAP Forum, Seoul Dialogue and Research Monitor Statistical Database on East Asia Regional Community Building East Asia Insights: Toward Community Building Reinvigorating US-Japan Policy Dialogue and Discussion in a Time of Political Change Managing China-Japan-US Relations and Strengthening Trilateral Cooperation Strengthening Nongovernmental Contributions to Regional Security Cooperation An Enhanced Agenda for US-Japan Partnership Seminars and Roundtables ...........................................................................................................................24 Roundtable on the Role of China in East Asia Community Building Joint Seminar on North Korea
    [Show full text]
  • In Japan 2016 on the Environment
    Annual Report on the Environment in Japan 2016 Annual Report on the Environment 02 in Japan 2016 03 Table of Contents Foreword Foreword - 03 A new stage for global e year 2015 was a historic one for the global environment. In October, the United Nations General Assembly adopted warming countermeasures - 04 1 the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a universal (1) A new international framework to address global warming - 05 (2) Japan’s global warming countermeasures - 06 set of goals and targets for achieving sustainable development (3) Plan for adaptation to climate change - 08 that involve the entire world. In December, the 21st Confer- (4) Research and development - 10 ence of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Con- (5) Green finance - 12 vention on Climate Change (COP21) adopted the Paris (6) International cooperation - 12 (7) Strategic actions targeting the long-term goal - 13 Agreement, the rst legally binding agreement since the Tamayo Marukawa (8) Other international frameworks - 14 Kyoto Protocol eighteen years earlier. And, in May 2016 in Minister of the Environment Japan, the Cabinet approved the Plan for Global Warming Reconstruction after Countermeasures, the G7 Ise-Shima Summit was held in Ise-Shima, Mie Prefecture, and the G7 Toyama Environment the Great East Japan Earthquake - 16 2 Ministers’ Meeting was held in Toyama City, Toyama Prefec- (1) Progress in restoration of the environment - 17 ture. Both internationally and domestically, it could be said (2) Restoration of the environment in areas contaminated - 18 by radioactive materials that global warming countermeasures and the creation of a (3) Health management for people exposed to radiation - 20 sustainable society have entered a new stage.
    [Show full text]
  • List of New Ministers (3 August 2016)
    List of New Ministers (3 August 2016) Incumbents Taro ASO (R) Deputy Prime Minister Minister of Finance Minister of State for Financial Services Minister in charge of Overcoming Deflation Sanae TAKAICHI (R) Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications Katsutoshi KANEDA (R) Minister of Justice Fumio KISHIDA (R) Minister for Foreign Affairs Hirokazu MATSUNO (R) Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Minister in charge of Education Rebuilding Yasuhisa SHIOZAKI (R) Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare Yuji YAMAMOTO (R) Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Hiroshige SEKO (C) Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Minister in charge of Industrial Competitiveness Minister in charge of the Response to the Economic Impact caused by the Nuclear Accident Minister of State for the Nuclear Damage Compensation and Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation Keiichi ISHII (R) Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Minister in charge of Water Cycle Policy Koichi YAMAMOTO (R) Minister of the Environment Minister of State for Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Tomomi INADA (R) Minister of Defense Yoshihide SUGA (R) Chief Cabinet Secretary Minister in charge of Alleviating the Burden of the Bases in Okinawa Masahiro IMAMURA (R) Minister for Reconstruction Minister in charge of Comprehensive Policy Coordination for Revival from the Nuclear Accident at Fukushima Jun MATSUMOTO (R) Chairperson of the National Public Safety Commission Minister in charge of Administrative Reform Minister in charge of Civil Service
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary Materials Fukushima (as of December 27). 6. Miscellaneous Brief Report on the Damage from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (Report No. 832) ● 57,954 people evacuated to locations outside the (1) Rail Lines January 10, 2013, 8:00 am: Fukushima Prefecture Disaster Response Headquarters prefecture (based on an December 6 survey). ● Joban Line: Hirono–Haranomachi and Soma– Total of 156,026 people Watari (Restoration Not Determined) 1. Alerts and Warnings April 7 11:32 pm Seismic Intensity 5.0–5.4: (2) General Roads March 11 2:46 pm Kori, Kunimi, Tamura, Date, Soma, 4. Casualties and Damage from the Disaster ● Primary National Highways: National Route 6: Seismic Intensity 6.0–6.4: Shirakawa, Shinchi, Iitate, and Minamisoma (1) Casualties Entire route open including detours (no entry into Sukagawa, Kunimi, Tenei, Tomioka, Other areas of Fukushima measured ● 3,070 fatalities (1,024 in Minamisoma, 475 in the evacuation zone) Okuma, Namie, Kagamiishi, Naraha, seismic intensities of 4.5–4.9. Soma, 441 in Iwaki, 411 in Namie, 153 in ● Other National Highways: All routes open as of Futaba, and Shinchi Tomioka, etc.) June 8, 2012 Seismic Intensity 5.5–5.9: Fukushima April 11 5:16 pm Seismic Intensity 5.5–5.9: ● 5 missing persons (1 from Sukagawa, etc.) ● Prefectural Roads: 23 roads closed, including the City, Nihonmatsu, Motomiya, Nakajima, Furodono, and Iwaki ● 20 with serious injuries (4 from Soma, 3 from Kitaizumi Odaka Line Koriyama, Koori, Kawamata, Nishigo, Seismic Intensity 5.0–5.4: Shirakawa, Iwaki, etc.) ● Country Roads: All routes open as of April 13, Yabuki, Nakajima, Tamakawa, Ono, Kagamiishi, Tenei, Tanagura, Hirata, ● 162 with minor injuries (57 from Minamisoma, 2012 Tanagura, Date, Hirono, Asakawa, and Asakawa 20 from Kunimi, etc.) (3) Expressways Tamura, Iwaki, Kawauchi, Iitate, Soma, Other areas of Fukushima measured (2) Damage to Housing and Other Buildings ● Joban Expressway: Section of the expressway Minamisoma, and Inawashiro seismic intensities of 4.5–4.9.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Country Review
    Japan 2016 Country Review http://www.countrywatch.com Table of Contents Chapter 1 1 Country Overview 1 Country Overview 2 Key Data 4 Japan 5 Asia 6 Chapter 2 8 Political Overview 8 History 9 Political Conditions 11 Political Risk Index 66 Political Stability 81 Freedom Rankings 96 Human Rights 108 Government Functions 110 Government Structure 112 Principal Government Officials 117 Leader Biography 120 Leader Biography 120 Foreign Relations 122 National Security 152 Defense Forces 154 Chapter 3 157 Economic Overview 157 Economic Overview 158 Nominal GDP and Components 162 Population and GDP Per Capita 164 Real GDP and Inflation 165 Government Spending and Taxation 166 Money Supply, Interest Rates and Unemployment 168 Foreign Trade and the Exchange Rate 169 Data in US Dollars 170 Energy Consumption and Production Standard Units 171 Energy Consumption and Production QUADS 173 World Energy Price Summary 174 CO2 Emissions 175 Agriculture Consumption and Production 176 World Agriculture Pricing Summary 179 Metals Consumption and Production 180 World Metals Pricing Summary 183 Economic Performance Index 184 Chapter 4 196 Investment Overview 196 Foreign Investment Climate 197 Foreign Investment Index 202 Corruption Perceptions Index 215 Competitiveness Ranking 226 Taxation 235 Stock Market 236 Partner Links 237 Chapter 5 238 Social Overview 238 People 239 Human Development Index 242 Life Satisfaction Index 245 Happy Planet Index 257 Status of Women 266 Global Gender Gap Index 268 Culture and Arts 278 Etiquette 278 Travel Information 281 Diseases/Health Data 291 Chapter 6 297 Environmental Overview 297 Environmental Issues 298 Environmental Policy 299 Greenhouse Gas Ranking 300 Global Environmental Snapshot 311 Global Environmental Concepts 323 International Environmental Agreements and Associations 337 Appendices 361 Bibliography 362 Japan Chapter 1 Country Overview Japan Review 2016 Page 1 of 374 pages Japan Country Overview JAPAN Japan's first contact with the Western world came in 1542 when a Portuguese ship landed on its shore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster
    The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster When the Nuclear Safety Commission in Japan reviewed safety-design guidelines for nuclear plants in 1990, the regulatory agency explicitly ruled out the need to consider prolonged AC power loss. In other words, nothing like the catastrophe at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was possible— no tsunami of 45 feet could swamp a nuclear power station and knock out its emergency systems. No blackout could last for days. No triple meltdown could occur. Nothing like this could ever happen. Until it did—over the course of a week in March 2011. In this volume and in gripping detail, the Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, a civilian-led group, presents a thorough and powerful account of what happened within hours and days after this nuclear disaster, the second worst in history. It documents the fi ndings of the Chairman, fi ve commissioners, and a working group of more than thirty people, including natural scientists and engineers, social scientists and researchers, business people, lawyers, and journalists, who researched this crisis involving multiple simultaneous dangers. They conducted over 300 investigative interviews to collect testimony from relevant individuals. The responsibility of this committee was to act as an external ombudsman, summarizing its conclusions in the form of an original report, published in Japanese in February 2012. This has now been substantially rewritten and revised for this English- language edition. The work reveals the truth behind the tragic saga of the multiple catastrophic accidents at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. It serves as a valuable and essential historical reference, which will help to inform and guide future nuclear safety and policy in both Japan and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Sectoral Cooperation on Global ISSUES
    CROSS-SECTORAL COOperatiON ON GLOBAL ISSUES As the challenges facing Japan and the international community have become more complex, it has become apparent that there is a need for greater coordination and cooperation among diverse sectors of society, both domestically and internationally. A growing number of JCIE’s initiatives now cut across its three programmatic pillars—policy studies, political exchange, and civil so- ciety programs—drawing on the expertise and strong networks developed in these areas and bringing together leaders from various fields in order to effectively respond to emerging issues that cannot be dealt with solely by one sector of society. For example, JCIE’s program on global health and hu- man security, which attempts to deal in a comprehensive manner with the interconnected health threats facing individuals and communities in developing countries, would not be effective without the active involvement of policy experts and scholars, politicians, and civil society organizations. As part of this program, JCIE also serves as secretariat of the Friends of the Global Fund, Japan, which builds support in Japan and throughout Asia for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Finally, JCIE undertakes special initiatives to encourage the development of the next generation of international leaders across sectors. Friends of the Global Fund, Japan In 2004, JCIE founded the Friends of the Global Fund, important to mobilize leadership in other sectors of Japan (FGFJ), a private support group for the Global society as well, ranging from business to civil soci- Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The ety, academia, and medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • COP 10 Presidency Report
    May 2014 Report on activities of Japan as President and the host country of COP10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity decided at its ninth meeting (COP9) that COP10 will be held in Japan in October 2010. The host country of the meeting is customarily elected as President of the COP, thus the Minister of the Environment of Japan was elected as COP10 President at its opening session. Japan served as President until the Minister of India was elected as the new President at the opening session of COP11 in October 2012. This report describes the achievements of Japan as President and host of COP10, including its collaborative work with various stakeholders. Notable features of the COP10 Presidency can be summarized as follows; ・ Demonstration of leadership towards active and smooth negotiations and successful outcomes at COP10 by encouraging the international community to discuss key biodiversity issues prior to COP10 at various international meetings and symposia, ・ Close collaboration with domestic stakeholders in hosting COP10, including relevant ministries, local authorities, NGOs, businesses, and the general public. This collaboration was established not only for purpose of hosting the COP, but also served to encourage continuous participation of these stakeholders in subsequent activities to implement COP outcomes (such as the revision of the Japanese NBSAP, development of LBSAPs, elaboration of guidance documents on business engagement for biodiversity, promotion of the citizen biodiversity action list, etc.), ・ Continuous support for the international implementation of COP outcomes through the establishment of the Japan Biodiversity Fund and other measures during and beyond the term of the COP Presidency, and ・ Advanced implementation of the Convention at national level, which allowed the provision of concrete examples of implementation measures to other Parties.
    [Show full text]