<<

BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org

Thiazide Exacerbate -Induced

Sirirat Reungjui,* Carlos A. Roncal,* Wei Mu,* Titte R. Srinivas,* Dhavee Sirivongs,† Richard J. Johnson,* and Takahiko Nakagawa*

*Division of Nephrology, and Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and †Division of Nephrology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

ABSTRACT Fructose is a commonly used sweetener associated with diets that increase the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. diuretics are frequently used in these patients for treatment of hypertension, but they also exacerbate metabolic syndrome. Rats on high-fructose diets that are given exhibit potassium depletion and . Potassium supplementation improves their resistance and hypertension, whereas reduces levels of and ameliorates hypertension, , , and . Both potassium supplementation and treat- ment with allopurinol also increase urinary nitric oxide excretion. We suggest that potassium depletion and hyperuricemia in rats exacerbates endothelial dysfunction and lowers the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which blocks insulin activity and causes insulin resistance during thiazide usage. Addition of potassium supplements and allopurinol with thiazides might be helpful in the management of metabolic syndrome.

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007040416

The metabolic syndrome (MS) is a constellation of adverse effects, they increase the incidence of new on- risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 set of diabetes9 and can be associated with hypokale- and consists of abdominal , hyper- mia, hyperuricemia, and hyperlipidemia.11 triglyceridemia, low HDL , high BP, in- Understanding the precise mechanisms by which sulin resistance, and hyperglycemia.1,2 Endothelial HCTZ exacerbates MS is important. Some evidence dysfunction and hyperuricemia also are closely as- suggests that thiazide-induced hypokalemia may me- sociated with MS.3,4 diate insulin resistance.12,13 In addition, experimental (HCTZ) is beneficial in hyperuricemia can cause endothelial dysfunction,3,14 patients with hypertension because it reduces mor- hypertension,15 and .3,16 Further- bidity and mortality, especially the frequency of more, we recently reported that hyperuricemia causes and congestive heart failure.5,6 As a result, the development of MS, and allopurinol, which lowers thiazides are recommended as the first-line therapy uric acid levels, improves these features of MS in fruc- for hypertension.6 However, many patients with tose (F)-fed rats.3 We therefore hypothesized that hy- hypertension have MS. In turn, HCTZ usage, al- though critical in the management of hypertension, can have several adverse effects, such as Received April 6, 2007. Accepted June 20, 2007. disorders (hypokalemia, , and hypo- Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at magnesemia), hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, and www.jasn.org. impairment of in addition to Correspondence: Dr. Sirirat Reungjui, current address is Division volume depletion.7–10 These adverse effects result in of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand 40002. Phone: ϩ66-43-363746; Fax: ϩ66-43- the development or exacerbation of MS. Although 347542; E-mail: [email protected] low-dosage thiazides have led to a reduction of these Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Nephrology

2724 ISSN : 1046-6673/1810-2624 J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 www.jasn.org BASIC RESEARCH pokalemia and hyperuricemia may be primary mechanisms by which the thiazides facilitate the MS and that acceleration of MS by thiazides may be prevented by potassium (K) supplementation and allopurinol. In this study, we administered thiazides to rats with MS, because this syndrome is common in patients with hyperten- sion and it is important to determine whether thiazides can exacerbate its features. Although there are various models of MS in animals, we selected the F-induced model of MS. In- deed, the increasing incidence of MS in humans in the past two decades coincides with a marked increase in F intake.17,18 Im- portantly, that high F consumption causes features of the MS has been documented in clinical studies.19–21 Similarly, high-F diets cause MS in rodents, including hypertension, insulin re- Figure 1. SBP at weeks 4 and 16. The rats receiving F develop sistance, and hypertriglyceridemia.3,22,23 In this study, we hy- hypertension. HCTZ reduces the SBP. KCL further reduces BP at pothesized that HCTZ use exacerbates F-induced MS and ex- week 16. Similarly, allopurinol reduces BP reduction at both weeks 4 and 16. Data are means Ϯ SD. P at least Ͻ0.05 *versus normal , amined the role of hypokalemia and hyperuricemia in this &versus F, $versus FϩHCTZ, and #versus FϩHCTZϩKCL. process.

RESULTS HCTZ Reduced Systolic BP but Aggravated F-Induced MS Body Weights HCTZ use reduced systolic BP (SBP) in the FϩHCTZ group All rats were pair fed to eliminate effects of food intake on the compared with the F group at weeks 4 and 16 (Figure 1). The results, which can influence glucose, insulin, and level of serum K was significantly lower in the FϩHCTZ and levels. Although this will not allow us to determine whether FϩHCTZϩallopurinol groups at week 20, whereas all thiazides can cause because access was not ad libi- HCTZ-treated rats also developed hypomagnesemia (Table tum, it did allow us to determine whether thiazides alter tri- Ϫ 1). An increase of serum HCO3 was also observed (F glyceride and glucose levels independent of effects on food 23.0 Ϯ 0.9; FϩHCTZ 24.7 Ϯ 1.1; FϩHCTZϩKCL 25.6 Ϯ intake. As such, the average body weights were similar in all 1.8; FϩHCTZϩallopurinol 25.7 Ϯ 1.5 mEq/L; all P Ͻ0.05 groups at week 20, as shown in Table 1. versus the F group). HCTZ use did not exacerbate MS early at week 4; the met- F-Induced Features of MS in Rats abolic profile of the F group and the FϩHCTZ group was sim- At week 4, the F-fed rats developed early features of MS, in- ilar at this time. However, HCTZ aggravated insulin resistance cluding hypertension (Figure 1), hypertriglyceridemia (nor- (Figure 3) and hyperuricemia at week 14 (F 2.2 Ϯ 0.5 versus Ϯ Ϯ Ͻ mal diet 125 55 versus F 325 104 mg/dl; P 0.001) and FϩHCTZ 2.7 Ϯ 0.5 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.04) and at week 20 (F 2.2 Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ hyperuricemia (normal diet 1.7 0.3 versus F 2.2 0.4 mg/dl; 0.6 versus FϩHCTZ 2.8 Ϯ 0.6 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.02). Serum glucose ϭ P 0.01). Serum cholesterol was significantly higher at week was also increased by HCTZ at week 14 (F 150 Ϯ 10 versus 14 (Figure 2). No significant difference in serum glucose was FϩHCTZ 176 Ϯ 13 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.006) and at week 20 (F 160 Ϯ observed between the F group and the normal diet group (Fig- 26 versus FϩHCTZ 186 Ϯ 22 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.02). Although se- ure 2). ϩ Table 1. Renal function, serum K, serum Mg2 , and urinary uric acid excretion evaluated at week 20 of the study F ؉ HCTZ ؉ F ؉ HCTZ ؉ Groups N F F ؉ HCTZ KCL Allopurinol Body weight (g) 543 Ϯ 45 565 Ϯ 66 560 Ϯ 88 558 Ϯ 58 557 Ϯ 89 BUN (mg/dL) 13.8 Ϯ 1.4 13 Ϯ 2.6 26.6 Ϯ 14a,b 25.3 Ϯ 6.6a,b 22.5 Ϯ 6.4a,b Cr (mg/dL) 0.44 Ϯ 0.05 0.43 Ϯ 0.05 0.46 Ϯ 0.11 0.44 Ϯ 0.07 0.44 Ϯ 0.05 Serum K (mEq/L) 4.4Ϯ 0.2 4.3 Ϯ 0.1 4.0 Ϯ 0.1a,b,d 4.5 Ϯ 0.3 4.1 Ϯ 0.1a,b,d ϩ Serum Mg2 (mg/dL) 1.6 Ϯ 0.28 1.5 Ϯ 0.23 1.15 Ϯ 0.1a,b 1.09 Ϯ 0.1a,b 1.1 Ϯ 0.1a,b Urine protein/Cr 0.24 Ϯ 0.4 2.29 Ϯ 2.5a 2.53 Ϯ 2.3a 3.18 Ϯ 2.8a 2.86 Ϯ 2.4a Urine uric acid (mg/d) 2.42 Ϯ 0.4 4.07 Ϯ 0.8a 2.93 Ϯ 1.0b 3.67 Ϯ 0.9a 3.38 Ϯ 1.1a Uric acid clearance (ml/min) 0.09 Ϯ 0.02 0.13 Ϯ 0.02a 0.08 Ϯ 0.03b 0.11 Ϯ 0.3 0.17 Ϯ 0.05a,c,d Data are expressed as meanϮ SD. N, normal diet group; F, fructose diet group; FϩHCTZ, fructose diet and hydrochlorothiazide group; FϩHCTZϩKCL, fructose diet and hydrochlorothiazide plus potassium chloride group; FϩHCTZϩAllopurinol, fructose diet and hydrochlorothiazide plus allopurinol group. All P values are at least Ͻ0.05. aP versus normal diet; bP versus fructose diet; cP versus FϩHCTZ; dP versus Fϩ HCTZϩKCL.

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 Thiazides and Metabolic Syndrome 2725 BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org

ϩKCL rats at week 16 (FϩHCTZ 136 Ϯ 4 versus FϩHCTZ- ϩKCL 131 Ϯ 5 mmHg; P ϭ 0.04), whereas no effect was observed at week 4 (FϩHCTZ 129 Ϯ 5 versus FϩHCTZϩKCL 127 Ϯ 3 mmHg; P Ͼ 0.05). By , serum glucose was not decreased despite insulin administration in the FϩHCTZ group, whereas insulin-induced reduction of serum glucose was observed in the FϩHCTZϩKCL group (Figure 4). These data suggest that K supplementation improves insulin sensitivity, which was deteriorated by fructose with HCTZ. Compatibly, K supplementation tended to lower serum gluc- ose at week 20 (FϩHCTZ 186 Ϯ 22 versus FϩHCTZϩKCL 166 Ϯ 20 mmHg; P ϭ 0.06). No significant change of serum uric acid and serum was observed in the FϩHC- TZϩKCL group compared with the FϩHCTZ group.

Lowering Uric Acid with Allopurinol Improved Hypertension, Hypertriglyceridemia, Hyperglycemia, Figure 2. Time courses of serum uric acid (A), serum glucose (B), and Insulin Resistance serum cholesterol (C), and serum triglycerides (D). The rats receiving Allopurinol treatment significantly reduced the level of serum F developed hyperuricemia and hypertriglyceridemia throughout uric acid in the FϩHCTZ group. In addition, allopurinol sig- the study. Hypercholesterolemia was detected at week 14. The nificantly reduced SBP (Figure 1), and serum triglycerides combination of HCTZ with F causes more hyperuricemia and hyper- were also significantly lower than the FϩHCTZ group at weeks glycemia as shown at weeks 14 and 20. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride are numerically higher with HCTZ use but did not reach 4, 14, and 20 (Figure 2). statistical significance. KCL tends to reduce serum glucose at week Insulin resistance was improved by allopurinol (Figures 3 20 (P ϭ 0.06). Allopurinol treatment significantly reduces serum uric and 4). In addition, serum glucose was significantly lower at acid and triglycerides at all time points and serum glucose at week week 20 (FϩHCTZ 186 Ϯ 22 versus FϩHCTZϩallopurinol 20. Data are means Ϯ SD. P at least Ͻ0.05 *versus normal diet, 166 Ϯ 14 mg/dl; P ϭ 0.04). &versus F, $versus FϩHCTZ, and #versus FϩHCTZϩKCL. To investigate further the role of uric acid, we examined the correlation between uric acid and other factors. When individ- ual data on rats were examined at week 20, serum uric acid positively correlated with serum triglycerides, serum choles- terol, and serum glucose (Figure 5). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between serum uric acid and SBP at week 4 (r ϭ 0.53, P ϭ 0.003) and serum insulin at week 14 (r ϭ 0.42, P ϭ 0.009).

Insulin and Other Factors At week 14, serum insulin concentrations in normal, F, FϩHCTZ,

Figure 3. QUICKI at week 14. The combination of FϩHCTZ significantly lowers insulin sensitivity than the normal diet or the F. Treatment with allopurinol improves insulin sensitivity. KCL tends to improve insulin sensitivity, but this was NS. Data are means Ϯ SD. P Ͻ 0.05 *versus normal diet, &versus F, and $versus FϩHCTZ.

Figure 4. The insulin tolerance test at week 18. glucose rum triglycerides were higher in the FϩHCTZ group, they did levels were not lowered by insulin in rats receiving F with or not reach statistical significance (Figure 2). without HCTZ, consistent with insulin resistance. In contrast, KCL and allopurinol treatment improve the insulin response similar to K Supplementation Reduced SBP and Improved Insulin that observed with the normal diet group. Data are means Ϯ SD. Resistance P at least Ͻ0.05 *versus normal diet, &versus fructose diet, and K supplementation significantly reduced SBP in FϩHCTZ- $versus FϩHCTZ.

2726 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 www.jasn.org BASIC RESEARCH

FϩHCTZϩKCL, and FϩHCTZϩallopurinol groups were higher urinary uric acid excretion per day and uric acid clear- 1846 Ϯ452, 2561 Ϯ1286, 3449 Ϯ1200, 3058 Ϯ1514, and 2319 Ϯ ance compared with the normal group (Table 1), which sug- 971 pg/ml, respectively. Significant differences of serum insulin gested an increase of uric acid production. Similar to that ob- were detected between FϩHCTZ and normal (P ϭ 0.002) and served in humans, HCTZ enhanced hyperuricemia (Figure 2), borderline significance between FϩHCTZ and FϩHCTZϩallop- which could be attributed to a reduction of urinary uric acid urinol (P ϭ 0.05). Serum insulin levels positively correlated not excretion (Table 1). Allopurinol acutely reduced 32.3% of uri- only with serum glucose but also with serum triglycerides and nary uric acid excretion compared with the FϩHCTZ group serum cholesterol (Figure 5), suggesting an association between during the first week (P Ͻ 0.05), which could be due to a insulin resistance and dyslipidemia.24,25 reduced production of uric acid by allopurinol. However, it is of note that urinary uric acid excretion and uric acid clearance Renal Function and Urinary Excretion of Sodium, K, increased during the chronic phase despite allopurinol use and Uric Acid (Table 1). Although there was no significant difference in serum creati- nine between groups, an increased urinary protein excretion K Supplementation or Allopurinol Increase Urinary by F suggests renal dysfunction. However, an elevation of Nitric Oxide Excretion (BUN) in all HCTZ-treated groups Urine nitrate/nitrite excretion is a marker of nitric oxide (NO) (groups 3, 4, and 5) could be attributed to volume depletion bioavailability as well as endothelial function.26,27 F decreased induced by HCTZ, because F did not raise BUN. urine nitrate/nitrites, which were further lowered by HCTZ. With respect to urinary , HCTZ significantly in- However, K supplementation or allopurinol treatment in- creased daily urinary sodium excretion at week 1 (normal creased urinary nitrate/nitrite excretion (Figure 6). 0.4 Ϯ 0.2; F 0.5 Ϯ 0.1; FϩHCTZ 0.8 Ϯ 0.4; FϩHCTZϩKCL 0.8 Ϯ 0.2; and FϩHCTZϩallopurinol 0.9 Ϯ 0.3 mEq/d; all P Ͻ 0.05 versus normal or F). Urinary K excretion was also signifi- DISCUSSION cantly higher in the FϩHCTZ group (1.5 Ϯ 0.4 mEq/d) and the FϩHCTZϩallopurinol group (1.4 Ϯ 0.3 mEq/d) as compared The principal new finding in this study is that we can show with the F group (1.2 Ϯ 0.1 mEq/d). Because of K supplemen- experimentally that correcting the serum K and uric acid ab- tation, the FϩHCTZϩKCL group had normal serum K level normalities in F-induced MS in rats can largely prevent the with high urine K (3.1 Ϯ 1.1). metabolic abnormalities that are associated with thiazides. The The F group developed hyperuricemia (Figure 2) with beneficial effects of these treatments were associated with an increase in urine nitrite/nitrates, suggesting the involvement of endothelial dysfunction on the development of MS with thia- zide usage. Hypokalemia occurs in 6.5 to 50% of patients receiving di- uretics,28–30 with the average reduction of serum K from thia- zides reported at approximately 0.3 to 1.1 mEq/L.6,31,32 Previ- ous studies suggested that hypokalemia may be a factor causing hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance in pa-

Figure 6. Urine nitrate/nitrite level. The levels of urinary nitrate and nitrite in rats receiving F are lower than that observed in the normal diet group. HCTZ induces a further reduction of urinary nitrate and nitrite. KCL and allopurinol treatment increases the level of urinary nitrate and nitrite compared with the FϩHCTZ. Figure 5. Correlations of various metabolic factors in fructose/ Data are means Ϯ SD. P at least Ͻ0.05 *versus normal diet, HCTZ-induced MS in the rat. &versus F, and $versus FϩHCTZ.

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 Thiazides and Metabolic Syndrome 2727 BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org tients receiving thiazides, because these features can be im- for this discrepancy is dosage. For example, when 1000 kcal proved with K supplements.13,33 It also has been shown that K is given, insulin resistance develops in 1 wk19; when 864 depletion, even without frank hypokalemia, can cause insulin kcal/d is consumed, insulin resistance is observed only in resistance.34 In our experiments, HCTZ produced a significant organs with high fructokinase activity (liver, fat cells) and reduction in serum K (0.3 mEq/L), although this did not reach takes 4 wk20; and when lower dosages are given, no insulin the criteria of hypokalemia (serum K Ͻ3.5 mEq/L). Our im- resistance is observed, even after 1 mo.21 Similar situations portant finding is that this mild K depletion was significantly occur in the rat. With high dosages (60% F), insulin resis- associated with exacerbation of hyperglycemia, insulin resis- tance occurs within 4 to 8 wk3; with dosages similar to that tance, and a reduction of urine NO excretion, all of which were in the current American diet (15% total energy intake), it corrected by K supplementation. The observation that K sup- takes slightly more than 1 yr.44 However, the rat is more plements prevented the reduction of urine NO in F-fed rats resistant because it has low uric acid levels; indeed, if uricase receiving HCTZ is consistent with an improvement in endo- is inhibited, then 20% F will induce hyperinsulinemia rap- thelial function. K supplementation has been shown to act as idly.45 Furthermore, F, by virtue of increasing the circula- an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor35 and release tion of fatty acids, may to the ectopic deposition of fat NO to preserve endothelial function,36 whereas K depletion in liver and skeletal muscle that will cause insulin resistance was found to attenuate endothelial-dependent vasorelax- indirectly.46 This indirect induction of insulin resistance by ation.37 In turn, an inhibition of endothelial NO is known to F could also account for the discrepancy in some of these cause insulin resistance.38 studies. Because F and its metabolites fructose-3-phosphate Unlike glucose, F is the only sugar that rapidly increases and 3-deoxyglucosone cause oxidative and nonenzy- serum uric acid in humans as well as rodents.3 Recently, we matic glycation,47 the polyol pathway could also be involved found that F-induced hyperuricemia has a causal role in the in development of MS. pathogenesis of MS.3 This study demonstrated that HCTZ en- This study demonstrates that HCTZ aggravates the MS in hanced hyperuricemia in rats receiving a high-F diet by reduc- F-fed rats and that K supplementation and reducing uric acid ing urinary uric acid excretion, although F likely increases the levels may provide some protection. Nevertheless, it will be production of uric acid. Decreased urinary uric acid excretion important to determine whether similar protection can be pro- could be due to an increase in uric acid reabsorption in prox- vided by these maneuvers in humans. In this regard, we are imal tubule, which may be mediated by thiazide-induced vol- involved in a randomized, controlled trial to determine ume contraction.39 whether lowering of uric acid will improve features of MS as- Another important finding is that the lowering of serum sociated with thiazide use in black individuals with stage 1 uric acid by allopurinol was associated with an improvement of hypertension. the features of MS. We also found that a lowering of uric acid by allopurinol was associated with an increase in urinary NO excretion. Given that uric acid inhibits endothelial NO bio- CONCISE METHODS availability as well as endothelial function,3,14,40 a lowering of All animal studies were approved by the University of Florida Insti- uric acid could improve endothelial function in this model. tutional Animal Use and Care Committee. Collectively, these findings suggest that hyperuricemia, by vir- tue of reducing NO, plays a role in the pathogenesis of the MS Pilot Studies aggravated with HCTZ. Because variable dosages of HCTZ have been commonly used in The inhibition of uric acid production by allopurinol other studies (e.g., 3 to 80 mg/kg per d48,49), we performed pilot likely accounts for the reduction of urinary uric acid excre- studies to determine the minimum adequate dosage of HCTZ for tion during the first week. However, with long-term allo- this study. Because the aim of study was to examine the role of purinol treatment, the reduction in uric acid excretion was hypokalemia on adverse effects of HCTZ, we identified the lowest not observed. Although the precise mechanism remains un- dosage that can reduce BP along with a mild reduction of serum K. known, hyperuricemic rats are known to develop renal va- We therefore gave three different dosages of HCTZ (Sigma-Al- soconstriction with a reduction of renal blood flow, and this drich, St. Louis, MO) to normal rats. As a result, we found that 10 is reversed by allopurinol.41 In turn, an increase in renal mg/kg per d HCTZ is the lowest dosage that reduced BP and in- blood flow will result in increased uric acid excretion.42 In duced mild hypokalemia. this scenario, by improving endothelial dysfunction and re- nal blood flow, the lowering of uric acid could paradoxically Experimental Protocol enhance excretion. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150 to 200 g; Charles River, Wil- The effect of high F intake on insulin sensitivity is still mington, MA) were placed on a standard diet (Harlan, Madi- debated. As recently reviewed,43 some groups have observed son, WI) for a 5-d run-in period, then the rats were divided that healthy individuals develop insulin resistance after high into five groups (n ϭ 8) with similar body weight and baseline F consumption, whereas others have reported no effect on blood chemistry: Group 1: Normal standard diet (Harlan); glucose metabolism as well as insulin sensitivity. One reason group 2 (F): 60% fructose diet (Harlan); group 3 (FϩHCTZ):

2728 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 www.jasn.org BASIC RESEARCH

In addition to 60% fructose diet, HCTZ 10 mg/kg per d was Statistical Analyses supplied in drinking water; group 4 (FϩHCTZϩKCL): 60% F All data are shown as means Ϯ SD. One-way ANOVA (SPSS 14.0; diet with HCTZ and 1% K chloride (KCL) in drinking water; SPSS, Chicago, IL) and post hoc multiple comparisons were used to the concentration of KCL in drinking water was increased at determine the significance between the mean of multiple groups with weeks 5 (1.5% KCL), 15 (1.75% KCL), and 17 (2% KCL) to the least-significant difference test for equal and Dunnett test for un- ϩ maintain normal serum K level through the whole study; and equal variances. The homogeneity of variance was clarified by Levene group 5 (FϩHCTZϩallopurinol): 60% F diet plus HCTZ and test. The paired and unpaired t tests were used to compare the con- allopurinol 150 mg/L (Sigma-Aldrich) in drinking water. tinuous variables of the specific two groups. Pearson correlation was We pair-fed rats to ensure equivalent caloric intake, thereby used to address potential associations between groups. Statistical sig- avoiding the influence of different food intake on the meta- nificance was defined as P Ͻ 0.05. bolic abnormalities. Body weight was measured weekly. At weeks 1, 4, 14, and 20, metabolic cages were used for urine collection overnight, where water but no food was freely ac- cessed. After 4 h of , serum was also collected from the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS tail vein at weeks 4, 14, and 20. At the end of week 20, rats were killed. The work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health grants DK-52121, HL-68607, and HL-79352 and funds from Tail-Cuff BP Measurement Gatorade. S.R. is supported by a fellowship from the Anandamahidol SBP was measured in conscious rats with tail-cuff sphygmo- Foundation of Thailand. manometer (Visitech BP2000, Apex, NC) at weeks 4 and 16 as described previously.3 DISCLOSURES Biochemical Measurements T.N., S.R., and R.J.J. are listed as inventors on several patent applications Serum and urine K concentrations were determined with the atomic related to uric acid and cardiovascular disease from the University of Florida or absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer 306, Downers Grove, University of Washington. R.J.J. is also on the Scientific Board of Nephromics, IL). By use of an autoanalyzer (VetAce; Alfa Wassermann, West Cald- Inc. well, NJ), the routine chemistries including glucose, cholesterol, trig- lycerides, uric acid, BUN, and were measured in serum. In addition, urine protein concentration and urine creatinine were de- REFERENCES termined.

1. Hall WD, Watkins LO, Wright JT Jr, Wenger NK, Kumanyika SK, Gavin Serum Insulin and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity JR 3rd, Ferdinand KC, Watson K, Clark LT, Flack JM, Reed JW, Horton Check Index EW, Saunders E; African-American Lipid and Cardiovascular Council: Fasting serum glucose and insulin were obtained at week 14. Serum The metabolic syndrome: Recognition and management. Dis Manag 9: 16–33, 2006 insulin was determined with the rat insulin ELISA kit (Crystal Chem, 2. Liberopoulos EN, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS: Diagnosis and manage- Chicago, IL). Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) ment of the metabolic syndrome in obesity. Obes Rev 6: 283–296, is a mathematical model based on log-transformed fasting plasma 2005 glucose and insulin values by equal 1/(log [glucose] ϩ log [insulin]). 3. Nakagawa T, Hu H, Zharikov S, Tuttle KR, Short RA, Glushakova O, QUICKI predicts insulin sensitivity, with lower values representing Ouyang X, Feig DI, Block ER, Herrera-Acosta J, Patel JM, Johnson RJ: A causal role for uric acid in fructose-induced metabolic syndrome. more insulin resistance. QUICKI shows a good correlation with the Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F625–F631, 2006 hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp method, especially in individu- 4. Deedwania PC: Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in the meta- als with impaired glucose tolerance.50 bolic syndrome. Curr Diab Rep 3: 289–292, 2003 5. Turnbull F: Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: Results of prospectively-designed over- Insulin Tolerance Test views of randomized trials. Lancet 362: 1527–1535, 2003 At week 18, 0.75 U/kg recombinant human insulin (Novolin; Novo 6. The ALLHAT Study Group: Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive Nordisk, Princeton, NJ) was administered intraperitoneally after rats patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or had been fasted for 16 h. Blood glucose was determined on tail blood calcium-channel blocker vs. . JAMA 288: 2981–2997, 2002 via hand-held blood glucose monitor (OneTouch; Johnson & John- 7. Plavinik FL, Rodrigues CI, Zanella MT, Ribeiro AB: Hypokalemia, glu- cose intolerance, and hyperinsulinemia during diuretic therapy. Hy- son, Milpitas, CA) at five points: 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after insulin pertension 19[Suppl 2]: 1126–1129, 1992 injection. 8. Punzi HA, Punzi CF; Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Heart Attack Trial Study; Trinity Hypertension Research Institute: Metabolic issues in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Heart Attack Trial Study. Measurement of Urinary NO Curr Hypertens Rep 6: 106–110, 2004 Urine was determined for NO by using the nitrate/nitrite colorimetric 9. Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, Borgioni C, Gattobigio R, Filip- assay kit (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI). pucci L, Norgiolini S, Bracco C, Porcellati C: Adverse prognostic

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 Thiazides and Metabolic Syndrome 2729 BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org

significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects. Hyper- 28. Frishman WH, Burris JF, Mroczek WJ, Weir MR, Alemayehu D, Simon tension 43: 963–969, 2004 JS, Chen SY, Bryzinski BS: First-line therapy option with low-dose 10. Franse LV, Pahor M, Di Bari M, Shorr RI, Wan JY, Somes GW, Apple- bisoprolol fumarate and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with gate WB: Serum uric acid, diuretic treatment and risk of cardiovascular stage I and stage II systemic hypertension. J Clin Pharmacol 35: events in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. J Hyper- 182–188, 1995 tens 18: 1149–1154, 2000 29. Widimsky J, Cifkova R: The heart in hypertension and . 11. Lindholm LH, Persson M, Alaupovic P, Carlberg B, Svensson A, Sam- Herz 15: 49–53, 1990 uelsson O: Metabolic outcome during 1 year in newly detected hy- 30. Bloomfield RL, Wilson DJ, Buckalew VM Jr: The incidence of diuretic- pertensives: Results of the Antihypertensive Treatment and Lipid Pro- induced hypokalemia in two distinct settings. J Clin Hypertens 2: file in a North of Sweden Efficacy Evaluation (ALPINE study). 331–338, 1986 J Hypertens 21: 1563–1574, 2003 31. Hollifield JW, Slaton PE: Thiazide diuretics, hypokalemia and cardiac 12. Amery A, Birkenhager W, Brixko P, Bulpitt C, Clement D, Deruyttere arrhythmias. Acta Med Scand Suppl 647: 67–73, 1981 M, De Schaepdryver A, Fagard R, Forette F, Forte J: Glucose intoler- 32. Moser M: Low-dose diuretic therapy for hypertension: Clin Ther 8: ance during diuretic therapy in elderly hypertensive patients. A sec- 554–562, 1986 ond report from the European Working Party on high blood pressure 33. Helderman JH, Elahi D, Andersen DK, Raizes GS, Tobin JD, in the elderly (EWPHE). Postgrad Med J 62: 919–924, 1986 Shocken D, Andres R: Prevention of the glucose intolerance of 13. Andersson OK, Gudbrandsson T, Jamerson K: Metabolic adverse thiazide diuretics by maintenance of body potassium. Diabetes 32: effects of thiazide diuretics: The importance of normokalaemia. J In- 106–111, 1983 tern Med Suppl 735: 89–96, 1991 34. Norbiato G, Bevilacqua M, Meroni R, Raggi U, Dagani R, Scorza D, 14. Khosla UM, Zharikov S, Finch JL, Nakagawa T, Roncal C, Mu W, Frigeni G, Vago T: Effects of potassium supplementation on insulin Krotova K, Block ER, Prabhakar S, Johnson RJ: Hyperuricemia induces binding and insulin action in human obesity: Protein-modified fast and endothelial dysfunction. Kidney Int 67: 1739–1742, 2005 refeeding. Eur J Clin Invest 14: 414–419, 1984 15. Mazzali M, Hughes J, Kim YG, Jefferson JA, Kang DH, Gordon KL, Lan 35. Edwards G, Dora KA, Gardener MJ, Garland CJ, Weston AH: Kϩ is an HY, Kivlighn S, Johnson RJ: Elevated uric acid increases blood pres- endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in rat arteries. Nature 396: sure in the rat by a novel crystal-independent mechanism. Hyperten- 269–272, 1998 sion 38: 1101–1106, 2001 36. Sudhir K, Kurtz TW, Yock PG, Connolly AJ, Morris RC: Potassium 16. Nakagawa T, Tuttle KR, Short RA, Johnson RJ: Hypothesis: Fructose- preserves endothelial function and enhances aortic compliance in induced hyperuricemia as a causal mechanism for the epidemic of the Dahl rats. Hypertension 22: 315–322, 1993 metabolic syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 1: 80–86, 2005 37. Yang BC, Li DY, Weng Y, Lynch J, Wingo CS, Mehta JL: Increased 17. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM: Consumption of high-fructose corn superoxide anion generation and altered vasoreactivity in rabbits on syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidermic of obesity. Am J low-potassium diet. Am J Physiol 274: 1955–1961, 1998 Clin Nutr 79: 537–543, 2004 38. Nakagawa T, Sato W, Glushakova O, Heinig M, Clarke T, Campbell- 18. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett Thompson M, Yuzawa Y, Atkinson MA, Johnson RJ, Croker B: Diabetic WC, Hu FB: Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout mice develop advanced of in young and middle-aged women. JAMA 292: . J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 539–550, 2007 927–934, 2004 39. Iwaki K, Yonetani Y: Decreased renal excretion of uric acid following 19. Beck-Nielsen H, Pedersen O, Lindskov HO: Impaired cellular insulin diuretic administration in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 34: 389–396, 1984 binding and insulin sensitivity induced by high-fructose feeding in 40. Zoccali C, Maio R, Mallamaci F, Sesti G, Perticone F: Uric acid and normal subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 33: 273–278, 1980 endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol 20. Faeh D, Minehira K, Schwarz JM, Periasamy R, Park S, Tappy L: Effect 17: 1466–1471, 2006 of fructose overfeeding and fish oil administration on hepatic de novo 41. Sanchez-Lozada LG, Tapia E, Avila-Casado C, Soto V, Franco M, lipogenesis and insulin sensitivity in healthy men. Diabetes 54: 1907– Santamaria J, Nakagawa T, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ, Herrera- 1913, 2005 Acosta J: Mild hyperuricemia induces glomerular hypertension in nor- 21. Le KA, Faeh D, Stettler R, Ith M, Kreis R, Vermathen P, Boesch C, mal rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 283: F1105–F1110, 2002 Ravussin E, Tappy L: A 4-wk high-fructose diet alters lipid metabolism 42. Johnson RJ, Kang DH, Feig D, Kivlighn S, Kanellis J, Watanabe S, without affecting insulin sensitivity or ectopic lipids in healthy humans. Tuttle KR, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Herrera-Acosta J, Mazzali M: Is there a Am J Clin Nutr 84: 1374–1379, 2006 pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and 22. Sharabi Y, Oron-Herman M, Kamari Y, Avni I, Peleg E, Shabtay Z, renal disease? Hypertension 41: 1183–1190, 2003 Grossman E, Shamiss A: Effect of PPAR-gamma agonist on adiponec- 43. Havel PJ: Dietary fructose: Implications for dysregulation of energy tin levels in the metabolic syndrome: Lessons from the high fructose and lipid/ metabolism. Nutr Rev 63: 133– fed rat model. Am J Hypertens 20: 206–210, 2007 157, 2005 23. Delbosc S, Paizanis E, Magous R, Araiz C, Dimo T, Cristol JP, Cros G, 44. Blakely SR, Hallfrisch J, Reiser S, Prather ES: Long-term effects of Azay J: Involvement of oxidative stress and NADPH oxidase activation moderate fructose feeding on glucose tolerance parameters in rats. J in the development of cardiovascular complications in a model of Nutr 111: 307–314, 1981 insulin resistance, the fructose-fed rat. Atherosclerosis 179: 43–49, 45. Sanchez-Lozada LG, Lopez-Molina R, Soto V, Tapia E, Avila-Casado 2005 C, Bautista R, Nakagawa T, Franco M, Johnson RJ: Low fructose 24. Grundy SM: Atherogenic dyslipidemia associated with metabolic syn- caloric intake concomitant to hyperuricemia induces hyperinsulin- drome and insulin resistance. Clin Cornerstone 8[Suppl 1]: S21–S27, emia and renal structural damage in rats [Abstract]. JAmSoc 2006 Nephrol 2007. The authors will present this study as poster in the 25. Avramoglu RK, Basciano H, Adeli K: Lipid and lipoprotein dysregula- ASN meeting 2007 and they are doing more experiments to com- tion in insulin resistant states. Clin Chim Acta 368: 1–19, 2006 plete the study. 26. Puddu P, Puddu GM, Zaca F, Muscari A: Endothelial dysfunction in 46. Kelley DE, Goodpaster BH, Storlien L: Muscle triglyceride and insulin hypertension. Acta Cardiol 55: 221–232, 2000 resistance. Annu Rev Nutr 22: 325–346, 2002 27. Sousa T, Fernandes E, Nunes C, Laranjinha J, Carvalho F, Pinho D, 47. Chung SS, Ho EC, Lam KS, Chung SK: Contribution of polyol pathway Morato M, Albino-Teixeira A: Scavenging of nitric oxide by an antag- to diabetes-induced oxidative stress. J Am Soc Nephrol 14[Suppl]: onist of adenosine receptors. J Pharm Pharmacol 57: 399–404, 2005 S233–S236, 2003

2730 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 www.jasn.org BASIC RESEARCH

48. Webb RL, Navarrete AE, Davis S: Effects of valsartan and hydrochlo- 50. Straczkowski M, Stepien A, Kowalska I, Kinalska I: Comparison of rothiazide alone and in combination on blood pressure and heart rate simple indices of insulin sensitivity using the euglycemic hyperinsu- in conscious-telemetered spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Am J linemic clamp technique. Med Sci Monit 10: CR480–CR484, 2004 Hypertens 11: 59–65, 1998 49. Kobayashi H, Sano T, Tarazi RC, Fouad-Tarazi FM: Effects of antihy- pertensive drugs on heart and resistance vessels. Cardiovasc Res 24: 137–143, 1990 See related editorial, ЉThe Fructose Nation,Љ on pages 2619–2621.

J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2624–2731, 2007 Thiazides and Metabolic Syndrome 2731