Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® The tudeS nt Researcher: A Phi Alpha Theta History Student Publications Publication 2014 Factoring Guilt: Determining Blame during the Salem Witch Trials John R. Bergman Jr. Western Kentucky University,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_res_jour Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bergman, John R. Jr., "Factoring Guilt: Determining Blame during the Salem Witch Trials" (2014). The Student Researcher: A Phi Alpha Theta Publication. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_res_jour/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in The tudeS nt Researcher: A Phi Alpha Theta Publication by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Factoring Guilt: Determining Blame during the Salem Witch Trials John R. Bergman, Jr. 3 Introduction The Salem Witch Trials that took place from February 1692 to May 1693 in Salem, Massachusetts, has remained a controversial topic among historians for the last 320 years. Speculation continues over the causes, why the trials lasted so long, and the types of verdicts that were made during the trials. As part of these debates a new theory has emerged in the past twenty years that shifts the focus from the little girls who made the initial accusations. Historians are now examining the crucial role played by older women and men in the cycle of accusations that put over 150 people in jail and led to the deaths of 25 colonial citizens, including the passing of an unnamed infant that Sarah Good had given birth to while in prison.1 Everyone knows the “story” of the Salem Witch Trials.