Annual Report 2009 Table of Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Norges Høyesterett
NORGES HØYESTERETT Den 5. mai 2011 avsa Høyesterett dom i HR-2011-00910-A, (sak nr. 2010/1676), sivil sak, anke over dom, Sven Vidar Bottolvs Tore Inge Erlandsen Harald Glebo Jon Hovring Einar Åsmund Nordhagen Viggo Sivertsen Per Harald Hanssen Glenn Olaf Lyche (advokat Alex Borch – til prøve) Per Steinar Horne Hans Oddvar Tofterå (advokat Jon Gisle – til prøve) mot SAS Scandinavian Airlines Norge AS Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon (partshjelper) (advokat Tron Dalheim – til prøve) STEMMEGIVNING: (1) Dommer Normann: Saken gjelder gyldigheten av oppsigelsene av ti flygere i SAS Norge AS (SAS Norge). Hovedspørsmålet er om det skjedde ulovlig aldersdiskriminering ved utvelgelsen av dem som ble oppsagt. 2 (2) Morselskapet i SAS-konsernet, SAS AB, eier datterselskapene SAS Danmark A/S, SAS Norge AS og SAS Sverige AB. Flyvirksomheten ble opprinnelig drevet gjennom et konsortium eid av datterselskapene kalt Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark Norway Sweden (SAS-konsortiet). I 1989 ble SAS Commuter etablert som et søsterkonsortium til SAS-konsortiet. I 2001 overtok SAS AB aksjene i Braathens ASA. I 2002 ble Widerøe en del av SAS-konsernet, og i 2004 ble SAS Commuter innlemmet i SAS-konsortiet. (3) Med virkning fra 1. januar 2005 ble den norske virksomheten i SAS-konsortiet skilt ut og slått sammen med Braathens ASA til SAS Braathens AS. Selskapet endret senere navn til SAS Scandinavian Airlines Norge AS, og var de ankende parters arbeidsgiver på oppsigelsestidspunktet. (4) I forbindelse med implementeringen av de felles europeiske flysertifikatbestemmelsene ble den øvre grensen for ervervsmessig flysertifikat hevet fra 60 til 65 år, jf. forskrift 20. desember 2000 som trådte i kraft 1. -
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Norway) For the definitions of capitalised terms used throughout this Registration Document, see Section 13 “Definitions and Glossary”. Investing in the Shares involves risks; see Section 1 “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5. Investing in the Shares, including the Offer Shares, and other securities issued by the Issuer involves a particularly high degree of risk. Prospective investors should read the entire Prospectus, comprising of this Registration Document, the Securities Note dated 6 May 2021 and the Summary dated 6 May 2021, and, in particular, consider the risk factors set out in this Registration Document and the Securities Note when considering an investment in the Company. The Company has been severely impacted by the current outbreak of COVID-19. In a very short time period, the Company has lost most of its revenues and is in adverse financial distress. This has adversely and materially affected the Group’s contracts, rights and obligations, including financing arrangements, and the Group is not capable of complying with its ongoing obligations and is currently subject to event of default. On 18 November 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries applied for Examinership in Ireland (and were accepted into Examinership on 7 December 2020), and on 8 December 2020 the Company applied for and was accepted into Reconstruction in Norway. These processes were sanctioned by the Irish and Norwegian courts on 26 March 2021 and 12 April 2021 respectively, however remain subject to potential appeals in Norway (until 12 May 2021) and certain other conditions precedent, including but not limited to the successful completion of a capital raise in the amount of at least NOK 4,500 million (including the Rights Issue, the Private Placement and issuance of certain convertible hybrid instruments as described further herein). -
Q:/S/C/W270A2-03.Pdf
S/C/W/270/Add.2 Page 403 PART H OWNERSHIP S/C/W/270/Add.2 Page 405 H. OWNERSHIP 1. Regulatory aspects 659. This section will discuss: (a) the different concepts associated with the term "ownership", and their interactions; (b) documentary limitations affecting the analysis of the issue; and (c) main regulatory developments. (a) The different concepts associated with the term "ownership" and their interaction 660. As explained in the compilation (paragraphs 7-9, pages 220-221), in the professional and academic aviation literature the term "ownership" is indifferently used to refer to three distinct concepts: (i) The designation policy through which a country attributes the rights to operate, either domestically or under a bilateral Air Services Agreement, to a given airline(s) (e.g. the US Department of Transportation granting traffic rights to American Airlines but not to Continental Airlines on a non-open- skies destination). Designation policies were used in the past both at the national level (e.g. before the 1979 deregulation, the US Civil Aeronautics Board would attribute the right to operate on a given city-pair to a given airline) and at the international level. They seem now to be confined mainly to the international arena with the marginal exception of public services contracts. (ii) The national investment/establishment regime for airlines, whether operating only domestic flights, only international flights, or both. The investment regime may cover also non-scheduled carriers and, in certain instances, general aviation/business aviation carriers. In cases where there is only one, publicly-owned airline, there may be no investment regime since none is needed. -
Strategisk Regnskapsanalyse Og Verdsettelse Av Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
NORGES HANDELSHØYSKOLE Bergen, vår 2018 Strategisk regnskapsanalyse og verdsettelse av Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Julie Bækkelund og Anders Syverud Veileder: Leif Atle Beisland Selvstendig arbeid innen masterstudiet i regnskap og revisjon NORGES HANDELSHØYSKOLE Dette selvstendige arbeidet er gjennomført som ledd i masterstudiet i regnskap og revisjon ved Norges Handelshøyskole og godkjent som sådan. Godkjenningen innebærer ikke at Høyskolen eller sensorer innestår for de metoder som er anvendt, resultater som er fremkommet eller konklusjoner som er trukket i arbeidet. Sammendrag Formålet med denne oppgaven er å verdsette egenkapitalen til Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA per 13.04.2018. Vi benytter fundamental verdsettelse for å avdekke hvorvidt den faktiske aksjekursen på 265,0 kroner kan begrunnes i selskapets underliggende økonomiske forhold. Innledningsvis vil vi gi en kort presentasjon av Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA og bransjen selskapet opererer i. Dette legger grunnlaget for forståelsen av underliggende økonomiske forhold. Videre vil det gjennomføres en strategisk analyse for å få innsikt i hva som genererer lønnsomhet for både Norwegian og bransjen, samt hvilke makroøkonomiske forhold som kan påvirke driften. I denne delen undersøker vi hvorvidt selskapet er i besittelse av interne ressurser med evne til å skape konkurransefortrinn. Denne kvalitative analysen gir oss innsikt i blant annet at en tyngende reguleringspolitikk innen sikkerhetstiltak har ført til økt kostnadsnivå for bransjen, mens et felles europeisk marked og statlig støtte trekker i den andre retningen. Videre diskuterer vi at bransjen har oppnådd store kostnadsbesparelser som et resultat av nye, mer kostnadseffektive fly. Basert på den strategiske analysen finner vi at det kan foreligge en bransjefordel, men at det på daværende tidspunkt ikke foreligger noen ressursfordel. -
Masterthesis.Pdf (2.157Mb)
NORGES HANDELSHØYSKOLE Bergen, våren 2016 Bonusprogrammer i luftfartsmarkedet En empirisk analyse av SAS Eurobonus Bjørnar Sandnes Halvorsen Morten Røkeberg Skaug Veileder: Frode Steen Selvstendig utredning innen masterstudiet for Økonomi og administrasjon Hovedprofil: Økonomisk styring (BUS) Det selvstendige arbeidet er gjennomført som et ledd i masterstudiet i økonomi- og administrasjon ved Norges Handelshøyskole, og godkjent som sådan. Godkjenningen innebærer ikke at Høyskolen innestår for metodebruk eller resultater som fremkommer eller konklusjoner som er trukket i arbeidet. FORORD Denne masterutredningen er skrevet som et avsluttende ledd av masterstudiet i Økonomi og administrasjon ved Norges Handelshøyskole. Hovedprofilen er Økonomisk styring og utredningen tilsvarer 30 studiepoeng. Som flere har uttrykt før oss, vil en masterutredning være en langvarig og lærerik prosess. I etterkant av skriveprosessen vil en gjerne reflektere over arbeidet som er gjort, og hvordan dette er blitt materialisert i oppgaven. Og i mange tilfeller vil en også undre seg over oppgavens retning, og hvordan sidespor, tilfeldigheter og blindveier underveis kan ha bidratt til ferdigproduktet vi sitter med i dag. En ting er i alle fall sikkert: Det har vært en spennende prosess der vi har hatt mulighet til å benytte tilegnet kunnskap gjennom studiet samtidig som vi har lært nye ting som beveger seg noe utenfor vårt fagområde. Skriveprosessen har til tider vært utfordrende, men læringskurven har tilsvarende vært bratt. Vi ønsker derfor å rette en stor takk til vår veileder, Frode Steen, som gjennom godt engasjement, konstruktive tilbakemeldinger og gode innspill underveis har bidratt at skriveprosessen har vært morsom, spennende og interessant. I tillegg vil vi også takke Avinor som har bidratt med datamateriale. -
SAS “New” Business Model
SAS “new” business model David Sörhammar Uppsala University Department of Business Studies Sweden [email protected] Anna Bengtson Uppsala University Keywords: dynamics, market change, marketing practice, SAS. Abstract In September 2005 SAS introduced a new business model. Where did the model come from and what influenced it? This paper’s focus is on the making of the model where we study the making of a business model as a dynamic process through time. In concrete terms, traces of today’s model can be found and examined from the SAS group’s embryonic attempts starting in 1946, through the financially good years during the 1980s, to the market re-regulation in contemporary time. During these years several changes have taken part both on the larger air travel market and in SAS´s market practice. We have separated SAS´s history into three era’s, the technological era, the businessman’s airlines era, and the “to serve Europe with air travel” era. Elaborating on the theoretical notion of mutuality between markets and market practice (Cf. Helgesson et. al., 2004), the impact of these practices and of the market infra structure at different points in time are described and their importance for the emergence of the business model discussed. Our findings show that the political efforts to de-regulate the European air travel markets did not automatically change all market practices and thus not the market. The process that followed the de-regulation can better be characterised as a translation process in which a changed market was created, based on an already established network of embedded material and immaterial items, such as booking systems, airplanes and perceptive frames, that had to be taken into consideration. -
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.Pdf
FACULTY F SOCIAL SCIENCES, UIS BUSINESS SCHOOL MASTER’S THESIS STUDY PROGRAM: THESIS IS WRITTEN IN THE FOLLOWING SPECIALIZATION/SUBJECT: Business and administration Applied Finance THE ASSIGNMENT IS NOT CONFIDENTIAL TITLE:Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA AUTHOR(S) SUPERVISOR: Student number: Name: 230498 Christer B. Nordbø Marius Sikveland ………………… ……………………………………. 229868 Jabbar Raza ………………… ……………………………………. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF 2 BOUND COPIES OF THESIS Stavanger, ……/…… 2016 Signature administration:………………………… Executive Summary The purpose of this thesis is to do a valuation on Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, and based upon this objective we have formulated the following problem statement: “What is the fair value of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA as per 31.03.2016?” The purpose of this valuation is to evaluate if the stock price is either over or under priced. Based on the findings in this thesis, we estimated the stock price of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA to be NOK 283,1. On 31.03.2016 the stock price of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA was NOK 311,5 and therefore our claim is that the stock is overvalued. Our recommendation is then to sell the stock. To answer the problem statement, we will do a fundamental valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. First we did a strategic analysis, consisting one external analysis and one internal analysis. The external analysis consisted of a Pestle analysis and Porter Five Forces framework. This gave us the foundation for predicting future development and environment of the company. From the external analysis we found that the European market is driven by low margins and fierce competition. For the internal analysis we did a VRIO-analysis evaluating the internal resources. -
Annual Report 2008 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
Annual Report 2008 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 93 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Foreword from the Cheif Executive Officer Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA The Year in Brief Annual repport 2008 Bjørn Kjos Annual Report 2008 The Year in Brief S E V E R N A Y A Z E M L Q1 Q2 Y A New routes 9 New routes 32 S E V E R N A Y Passengers 1 997 035 (+ 53%) Passengers A Z2 344 219 (+ 47%) E M Boeing 737-800 deliveries 2 S EBoeingV E R 737-800N A Y deliveries 3 L A Z Y A Avg. spot fuel price USD 890 (+ 51 %) Boeing 737-300 deliveriesE M 2 y a L Y NOVOSIBIRSKIVE l Fuel hedge none Avg. spot fuel price A USD 1 176 (+ 83 %) e m OSTROVO Z Fuel hedge none a y a v a NOVOSIBIRSKIVE o • Opening of Rygge airportl y • Rebranded FlyNordic to Norwegian.se m N • Early eastery holidayae in March • Secured pre-delivery financing with Natixis for NOVOSIBIRSKIVE OSTROVO m l Z e a 10 first acquired Boeing 737-800 HGW OSTROVO Z y a a y v a o S E V E R N A v Y A N Z E o M L ALTA KIRKENES Y TROMSØ N Q3 A Q4 BARDUFOSS Table of contents HARSTAD/NARVIK New routes 3 New routes 18 KIRUNA Passengers 2 574 382 (+ 27%) Passengers 2 220 917 (+ 11%) BODØ ALTA KIRKENES y a NOVOSIBIRSKIVE TROMSØ ALTA m l Boeing 737-800 deliveries 1 Boeing 737-800 deliveries 1 TROMSØ KIRKENES e OSTROVO Z The year in Brief 03 BARDUFOSS a Boeing 737-300 deliveries 1 MD-80 re-delivery 3 HARSTAD/NARVIKLULEÅ BARDUFOSS y HARSTAD/NARVIK a Avg. -
Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa Quarterly Report – Fourth Quarter 2007
NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT – FOURTH QUARTER 2007 FOURTH QUARTER IN BRIEF The Group earnings before tax (EBT) was MNOK -34.0 (-35.6) in the fourth quarter. The fourth quarter operating revenue increased by 50.7 %, compared to last year, to MNOK 1,145.4 (759.9). The total quarterly earnings before depreciation (EBITDA) were MNOK -36.3 (-19.0), and the quarterly earnings after tax were MNOK -21.5 (-24.8). Norwegian transported a total of 1,670,075 passengers in the fourth quarter, passenger traffic (RPK) increased by 38 % compared to the same period last year. FlyNordic transported 332,565 passengers in the fourth quarter. The passenger load factor was 78 % (72 %) in the fourth quarter for Norwegian, whereas FlyNordic had a load factor of 74 %. The total production (ASK) increased by 27 % to 1,811 million this quarter for Norwegian. Total production (ASK) for Fly Nordic was 311 million in fourth quarter. The total quarterly unit cost for Norwegian was NOK 0.55 (0.55). Norwegian started Bank Norwegian in October 2007, and Norwegian’s total ownership in the bank is 20 %. A total of MNOK 9.0 of EBT is due to the sale of ownership and share of net results in the bank during the quarter. TRAFFIC STATISTICS 4.quarter Accumulated Norwegian 2007 2006 Change 2007 2006 Change Internet bookings 85 % 84 % 1 pp 86 % 84 % 2 pp ASK (mill) 1 811 1 421 27 % 6 959 5 371 30 % RPK (mill) 1 415 1 024 38 % 5 586 4 223 32 % Cabin factor 78 % 72 % 6 pp 80 % 79 % 2 pp Passengers 1 670 075 1 298 545 29 % 6 362 725 5 104 814 25 % Segment Domestic -
Markedet Resultater Historien Produktet Seneste Utvikling
Markedet Inntekter fra salg og merkevareassosiasjoner har fulgte nye ruter innenlands og utenlands. Før Norwegian kom på banen, hadde ingen hatt parallelle positive løp. Norwegian har skilt Høsten 2003 fikk selskapet konsesjon for å aktør på det norske flymarkedet klart å overleve seg klart fra konkurrentene gjennom produkt fly tre ruter på kortbanenettet i nord. De tre konkurransen fra den hyperprofesjonelle og kommunikasjon. De utfordrer fortsatt de rutene var Tromsø-Lakselv, Tromsø-Andenes og konkurrenten SAS. De har falt eller blitt etablerte konvensjonene i bransjen, selv om Andenes–Bodø. Denne Fokker F-50-operasjonen kjøpt opp en etter en, Widerøe, Color Air bransjen har begynt å kopiere utfordreren. ble avsluttet 31.12.2003 og de tre resterende og Braathen S.A.F.E. Konkurransen var og er Norwegians fikk i 2006 EU-patent for sin flyene ble solgt 2. kvartal 2004. enda mer kynisk enn i dagligvarebransjen, bestillingsløsning ”Lavpriskalenderen”! M.a.o. er 18. desember 2003 ble Norwegian Air Shuttle nettopp fordi det er mye vanskeligere for folk den så unik, at opphavsretten kan beskyttes. registrert på Oslo Børs. Børsintroduksjonen å sammenligne tilbudene fra de forskjellige Norwegian ble kåret til årets markedsfører i var vellykket og ble overtegnet. Emisjonen ga aktørene. Prisstrukturer og tilbudsannonsering er 2005. selskapet ny kapital på NOK 250 millioner. et salig virvar for forbruker. I begynnelsen av 2004 ble ytterligere tre fly Norwegian har etablert seg som Historien knyttet til flåten, som sommeren 2004 var på ”lavprisselskapet” i markedet og har i 2006 ca. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA ble etablert 22. totalt 11 fly. Det 12. -
Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Master’s Thesis Copenhagen Business School May 17th 2016 Authors: Morten Aleksander Tauland, CPR: XXXXXX-XXXX Markus Kleppe Gjennestad, CPR: XXXXXX-XXXX Programme: Finance and Strategic Management (FSM) Supervisor: Finn Østrup Number of standard pages: 120 Number of characters: 261 398 1 Executive summary Purpose of this thesis: Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA’s strategic direction is to become the first successful long-haul low-cost airline, with a staggering 267 new aircraft on order (current fleet, 99 aircraft) at year-end 2015. Based on this, we will estimate the fair value of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA per 12.04.2016. Analytical framework: We will conduct a strategic analysis to assess the external and internal environment that Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA operates in an extract the key value drivers for change. Then we reformulate our peer groups financial statements (e.g. adjust for operating leases) to perform a profitability and financial strength analysis of our peer group. Our findings to this point will be summarized in a SWOT matrix. After that, we use our findings to create a pro forma income statement and a pro forma balance sheet to construct a pro forma cash flow statement. The final valuation will utilize the pro forma statements in a DCF model to obtain a share price estimate. Finally, we conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine key value drivers’ impact on the share estimate. Key findings: The strategic analysis uncovered that the overall airline industry in a historical perspective has destroyed value for its equity investors, which we also found to be evident in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA history. -
Annual Report 2015
NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA ANNUAL REPORT 2015 NORWEGIAN AnnUAL REPORT 2015.INDd • CREATED: 09.10.2014 • MODIFIED: 08.04.2016 : 10:05 ALL RIGTHS RESERVED © 2016 TEIGENS DESIGN 02 NORWEGIAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015 NORWEGIAN AnnUAL REPORT 2015.INDd • CREATED: 09.10.2014 • MODIFIED: 08.04.2016 : 10:05 ALL RIGTHS RESERVED © 2016 TEIGENS DESIGN NORWEGIAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015 03 CONTENTS HIGHLIGHTS 04 Highlights 2015 04 Key figures – financials 05 Key figures – operation 06 LETTER FROM CEO 07 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORT 10 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 25 Group financial statements 26 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 30 Financial statements for the parent company 62 Notes to financial statements of the parent company 66 Auditor's report 82 FINANCIAL CALENDAR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 83 2016 BOARD AND MANAGEMENT 87 Interim report 1Q 2016: April 21 The Board of Directors 87 General shareholder meeting: May 10 The Management team 89 Interim report 2Q 2016: July 14 Interim report 3Q 2016: October 20 DEFINITIONS 91 Norwegian Air Shuttle reserves the right to revise the dates. CONTACT 92 NORWEGIAN AnnUAL REPORT 2015.INDd • CREATED: 09.10.2014 • MODIFIED: 08.04.2016 : 10:05 ALL RIGTHS RESERVED © 2016 TEIGENS DESIGN 04 Highlights NORWEGIAN ANNUAL REPORT 2015 HIGHLIGHTS 2015 Ä Awarded the title “World’s Best Low-Cost Long Haul Airline” and the “Best Low-Cost Airline in Europe” for the third year in a Q1 Q2 row, also by SkyTrax New routes 5 New routes 12 Ä Launched winter routes in domestic Passengers (million) 4.9 +2% Passengers (million) 7.0 +9% Spain and to