DOCSLIB.ORG

Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Copenhagen Business School Master THESIS Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Author: Charlotte PAUL 124639 Oda Elise ERIKSSON 124672 Supervisor: Poul KJÆR Programme: MSc Applied Economics and Finance May 15, 2020 Number of standard pages: 89 Number of characters: 162 554 1 Executive Summary The purpose of this paper is to conduct a valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA to find a fair value of the company. The Norwegian airline is based in Oslo and provided flights for over 36 million passengers in 2019. To date, the company has undergone significant changes in its management and moved its core focus from growth to profitability. Many years of growth and development has increased the size of the company and subsequently led to an increase in debt levels. Moreover, in the last two years, the company has faced numerous challenges related to the grounding of the new Boeing MAX8 aircraft, troubles with Rolls Royce engines on the Dreamliner aircraft, and the global Covid-19 crises. Strategic analysis, consisting of macro, industry and company-level analysis, revealed that consumer demand and the oil price pose a significant threat to the business performance of Norwegian. Moreover, industry analyses revealed that the nature of the aviation industry is highly competitive with a large number of airlines competing for the same customers making it increasingly difficult for Norwegian to turn a profit with a low contribution margin. Rules and regulations from the government also possess a significant impact on Norwegian, this is specifically related to the flight-seat-fine affecting customer demand through increased flight ticket prices. Financial analyses, based on historical figures publicly available and a comparison with two other airlines, revealed that Norwegian has significantly higher growth than competing airlines but this is not displayed in their profitability. The liquidity and profitability numbers highlight Norwegian’s weak business performance historically unlike its competitors. However, Norwegian has in the last year started to improve business performance, moving towards industry average. Strategic and financial analysis, together with up-to-date reports and articles, forms the foundation of forecasting. The present value approach using the DCF method and WACC as a discount rate revealed a share price of 15,76 NOK. The Norwegian shares are according to these analyses undervalued by the 10th of March 2020. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Problem statement...................................................................................................................6 1.3 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................6 1.3.1 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1.3.2 Design .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.3 Demarcation ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2. Company & Industry .......................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Company ..................................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Corporate structure .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 Fleet ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Aviation industry .................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 SAS AB ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.2 Ryanair ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 3. Strategic Analysis............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 PESTEL ................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Political and legal actors ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.1.2 Economic factors ....................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.3 Social factors .............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.4 Environmental factors ............................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.5 Technological factors ................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 Porter´s Five Forces ................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.1 Threats of new entrants ............................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.2 Supplier power .......................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 Threat of substitutes ................................................................................................................................. 23 3.2.4 Buyer power .............................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2.5 Industry rivalry ........................................................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Summary................................................................................................................................ 24 4. Financial analysis ............................................................................................................. 26 4.1 Reporting standards ............................................................................................................... 26 4.1.1 IFRS 16 ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Presentation of the financial statements ................................................................................. 28 4.3 Reorganization of the financial statements ............................................................................. 32 4.3.1 The reorganized income statement .......................................................................................................... 32 4.3.2 The reorganized balance sheet ................................................................................................................. 35 4.3.3 Special items .............................................................................................................................................. 41 4.3.4 Net operating profit less adjusted taxes (NOPLAT) ................................................................................... 42 4.4 Historical analysis ................................................................................................................... 43 4.4.1 Profitability analysis................................................................................................................................... 43 4.4.2 Growth analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 48 4.4.3 Liquidity risk analysis ................................................................................................................................. 50 3 4.4.4 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 53 5. Forecasting ...................................................................................................................... 55 5.1 Key figures ............................................................................................................................. 56 5.1.1 Fleet plan ................................................................................................................................................... 56 5.1.2 ASK/RASK ................................................................................................................................................... 57 5.1.3 Growth ....................................................................................................................................................... 57 5.2 Operating revenue ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Gatwick: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Gatwick Market Power Assessment (CAP 1052)2 . British Airways (BA) . easyJet . GAL . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . BA . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group PLC . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . Royal Mail . TNT Express Services . [] Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . Stop Stansted Expansion Information gathered under statutory powers (section 73 Airports Act 1986 / section 50 Civil Aviation Act 2012) .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Heathrow: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Heathrow Market Power Assessment (CAP 1051)2 . HAL . London Airlines Consultative Committee & Heathrow Airline Operators Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website: http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=78&pagetype=90&pageid=12275. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . British Airways . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1133 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . IAG Cargo . Royal Mail . Titan Airways . TNT Express Services . Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ot.Prp. Nr. 28 (2000-2001)
    Ot.prp. nr. 28 (2000-2001) Om lov om endringer i lov 11. juni 1993 nr. 101 om luftfart Tilråding fra Samferdselsdepartementet av 8. desember 2000, godkjent i statsråd samme dag. Kapittel 1 Ot.prp. nr. 28 2 Om lov om endringer i lov 11. juni 1993 nr. 101 om luftfart 1 Hovedinnholdet i proposisjonen Samferdselsdepartementet legger med dette frem forslag om endringer i lov 11. juni 1993 nr. 101 om luftfart. I kapittel 2 redegjøres det for bakgrunnen for forslaget til endring av luft- fartsloven, herunder forholdet til Luftfartstilsynet som ble skilt ut fra Luftfarts- verket pr. 1. januar 2000. I kapittel 3.1 redegjøres det for forslag til endringer i tilknytning til EØS- avtalen. Luftfartsloven fra 1993 synliggjør i liten grad nytt regelverk som er innført med hjemmel i EØS-avtalen og som omfatter EØS-området. Det er blant annet gitt sentrale EØS-regler om anbud, markedsadgang og lisens uten at dette fremgår direkte av loven. Departementet foreslår å tydeliggjøre lovens tosporede system, innenfor/utenfor EØS-området, samt hvilke spesielle regler som gjelder innenfor EØS-området. I kapittel 3.2 er det foreslått innført sanksjonsbestemmelser i tilknytning til de mest sentrale rådsforordningene som er en del av EØS-avtalen på luftfartens område. I kapittel 3.5 er det foreslått endringer i bestemmelsene om registrering og sletting av luftfartøy i Norges luftfartøyregister. Luftfartsloven gir regler for når et luftfartøy skal slettes fra luftfartøyregisteret. Bestemmelsene reiser imidlertid spørsmål i forhold til luftfartøy som er registrert på bakgrunn av EØS-reglene om lisens. Det er foreslått å utvide bestemmelsen til også å gjelde slettelse av luftfartøy når vilkårene i lisensforordningen ikke lenger er til stede.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of Blended Wing Body Mav Design
    IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308 COMPUTATIONAL AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BLENDED WING BODY MAV DESIGN Md. Akhtar khan1, Arjun Jagini2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, GITAM University, Hyderabad 2Analyst, emug technologies Limited, Hyderabad Abstract The Blended Wing Body (BWB) configuration has the potential to change the way subsonic transport airplanes are designed. In the past ten years, fuel efficiency and noise reduction have become the two biggest challenges for aircraft manufacturers. This paper deals with the computational aerodynamic analysis of a BWB airplane at subsonic speeds using Ansys CFD as a simulation tool and ICEM CFD as a modeling tool. The study will focus on the aerodynamic characteristics such as the pressure, velocity variation over the body at different angle of attack. We are also calculating the aerodynamic efficiency (lift force to drag force ratio) so that we can compare the performance of a BWB aircraft with a conventional aircraft. Keywords: Blended Wing Body (BWB), Hybrid Wing, Tetra Mesh, Square Cube Law, ICEM CFD ---------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INTRODUCTION important advantage is the increased useful passenger space. By far the greatest of these advantages is the relatively large The current design of transport aircraft has not changed increase in payload per unit span. However, the BWB significantly in the past few decades; rather incremental design also introduces a number of challenges such as the design optimization has taken place on each new generation vastly increased sensitivity to center of gravity position, of aircraft. Growing environmental concerns and fuel prices static stability issues and the manufacturing difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle - Publication of Listing Prospectus
    Aug 19, 2021 12:59 BST Norwegian Air Shuttle - Publication of listing prospectus Reference is made to the following bond issues of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA: • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 21/PERP FRN FLOOR C SUB CONV with ISIN NO 0010996432 and Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 21/PERP FRN FLOOR C SUB CONV with ISIN NO 0010996440 (jointly, the “New Capital Perpetual Bonds”), and • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 21/26 ADJ C with ISIN NO 0010996390 (“NAS13”). On 18 August 2021 the Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority (Nw. Finanstilsynet) approved a listing prospectus comprising of a summary, a registration document and a securities note, all dated 18 August 2021 (collectively the "Listing Prospectus"). The Listing Prospectus also cover the new shares issued by the Company as a result of the conversion of certain Dividend Claims (the “Shares”), as further set out in a stock exchange notice published by the Company on 27 July 2021. For more information, please refer to the Listing Prospectus which will, subject to regulatory restrictions in certain jurisdictions, be available at the Company’s website, www.norwegian.no/om-oss/selskapet/investor- relations/reports-and-presentations/. The Listing Prospectus has been prepared for the purpose of listing of the Bond Loans and the Shares only, and no securities are being offered pursuant to the Listing Prospectus. The Company has applied for the Bond Loans to be admitted to stock exchange listing on Oslo Børs. About Norwegian Norwegian was founded in 1993 but began operating as a low-cost carrier with Boeing 737 aircraft in 2002. Since then, our mission has been to offer affordable fares for all and to allow customers to travel the smart way by offering value and choice throughout their journey.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/29/2019 15:23:37 a DATE: 1 PAGE: EFBUF 11/05-07/19 Pre-Registration List
    DATE:10/29/2019 15:23:37 A PAGE: 1 EFBUF 11/05-07/19 Pre-Registration List **************************************************** MEMBER ORGANIZATION **************************************************** Jason Brown AIR CANADA Kevin Denoncourt AIR CANADA Warren Lampitt AIR CANADA Genseric Perras-Yu AIR CANADA Federico Campochiaro AIR DOLOMITI Pierluigi Cazzadori AIR DOLOMITI Eric Lesage AIRBUS Thierry Paya-Arnaud AIRBUS Francisco Javier Puertas Menina AIRBUS Francisco Javier Utrilla Ceballos AIRBUS Michael Krohn ALASKA AIRLINES Guillermo Ochovo ALASKA AIRLINES Bret Peyton ALASKA AIRLINES Terry Walters ALASKA AIRLINES Hiroshi Eguchi ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Makoto Kimoto ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Yasuo Kurakazu ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Hiroyuki Nonaka ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Genta Yamanoe ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS Sharitta Allen AMERICAN AIRLINES Allen Barronton AMERICAN AIRLINES Doris Berube AMERICAN AIRLINES Richard Bowman AMERICAN AIRLINES Doug Colcord AMERICAN AIRLINES Charles Durtschi AMERICAN AIRLINES Jeremy Flieg AMERICAN AIRLINES Charles Foulkes AMERICAN AIRLINES Lakshmi Lanka AMERICAN AIRLINES Edward Mackiewicz AMERICAN AIRLINES Brian Norris AMERICAN AIRLINES Todd Ringelstein AMERICAN AIRLINES Philipp Haller AUSTRIAN AIRLINES Dawson Hsu CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS Philippe Lievin COLLINS AEROSPACE Frederic Trincal COLLINS AEROSPACE Denise Vivas COLLINS AEROSPACE Kevin Berger DELTA AIR LINES Alexandria Brown DELTA AIR LINES Matt Eckstein DELTA AIR LINES Lee Fay DELTA AIR LINES Christina Fish DELTA AIR LINES Dan Gradwohl DELTA AIR LINES Ken Plunkett DELTA AIR LINES Charles
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • (EWG) Nr. 2407/92 Vorgesehene Beschränkung
    22 . 12 . 94 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr. C 366/9 Veröffentlichung der Entscheidungen der Mitgliedstaaten über die Erteilung oder den Widerruf von Betriebsgenehmigungen nach Artikel 13 Absatz 4 der Verordnung ( EWG) Nr. 2407/92 über die Erteilung von Betriebsgenehmigungen an Luftfahrtunternehmen (') (94/C 366/06) NORWEGEN Erteilte Betriebsgenehmigungen ( 2 ) Kategorie A : Betriebsgenehmigungen ohne die in Artikel 5 Absatz 7 Buchstabe a) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2407/92 vorgesehene Beschränkung Name des Anschrift des Luftfahrtunternehmens Berechtigt zur Entscheidung Luftfahrtunternehmens Beförderung von rechtswirksam seit Air Express AS Postboks 5 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 9 . 11 . 1993 AS Lufttransport Postboks 2500, 9002 Tromsø Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 15 . 7 . 1994 AS Mørefly Aalesund Lufthavn, 6040 Vigra Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 6 . 12 . 1993 Braathens SAFE AS Postboks 55 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Coast Air K/ S Postboks 126 , 4262 Avaldsnes Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 12 . 1993 Det Norske 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 6 . 1994 Luftfartselskab AS (DNL) Fred . Olsens Flyselskap Postboks 10 , 1330 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen , Post, Fracht 6 . 12 . 1993 AS Helikopter Service AS Postboks 522 , 4055 Stavanger Lufthavn Fluggästen , Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Helikopterteneste AS 5780 Kinsarvik Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 10 . 12 . 1993 Norwegian Air Shuttle AS Postboks 115 , 1331 Oslo Lufthavn Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 30 . 6 . 1994 Widerøe Norsk Air AS Sandefjord Lufthavn, Torp, 3200 Sandefjord Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 20 . 12 . 1993 Kategorie B : Betriebsgenehmigungen mit der in Artikel 5 Absatz 7 Buchstabe a) der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2407/92 vorgesehenen Beschränkung Name des Anschrift des Luftfahrtunternehmens Berechtigt zur Entscheidung Luftfahrtunternehmens Beförderung von rechtswirksam seit Air Stord AS Stord Lufthavn, 5410 Sagvåg Fluggästen, Post, Fracht 11 .
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Storebrand ASA 2019
    Annual Report 2019 Sustainable Solutions and Investments STOREBRAND ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Page 1, Photographer: Mikael Svensson/Johner Page 5, Photographer: Nathan Anderson/Unsplash Page 6, Photographer: Ole Berg-Rusten, NTB Page 9, Photographer: Alexey Topolyanskiy /Unsplash Page 17, Photographer: Bevan Goldswain/Offset.com Page 19, Photographer: Aurora Photos, USA / Offset.com Page 20, Photographer: Michael Nolan /Offset.com Page 23, Photographer: Unsplash Page 25, Photographer: Sarah Bridgeman/Offset.com Page 26, Photographer: Shutterstock/TunedIn by Westend61 Page 27, Photographer: Maskot/Offset.com Page 30, Photographer: Olga Kashubin Page 32, Photographer: Shutterstock/KYTan Page 35, Photographer: Maskot Bildbyrå /Johnér Bildbyrå AB Page 37, Photographer: Shutterstock/Syda Productions Page 38, Photographer: Kate Vredevoogd/Offset.com Page 43, Photographer: Shutterstock / Halfpoint Page 45, Photographer: Shutterstock Page 47, Photographer: Colourbox.com Page 51, Photographer: The Good Brigade/Offset.com Page 53, Photographer: Mikael Svensson / Johner Bildbyra AB / Offset.com Page 59, Photographer: Cultura / Offset.com Page 60, Photographer: Shutterstock / Kamil Macniak Page 63, Photographer: Unsplash Page 67, Photographer: Shutterstock/loreanto Page 71, Photographer: Storebrand archive Page 75, Photographer: Maskot/Offset.com Page 76, Photographer: Nixon Johansen Cáceres/Johnér Bildbyrå AB Page 77, Photographer: Martin Pålsson/Offset.com Page 85, Photographer: Shutterstock/Westend61 Premium Page 197, Photographer: Maskot/Offset.com Page
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)
    REGISTRATION DOCUMENT Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Norway) For the definitions of capitalised terms used throughout this Registration Document, see Section 13 “Definitions and Glossary”. Investing in the Shares involves risks; see Section 1 “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5. Investing in the Shares, including the Offer Shares, and other securities issued by the Issuer involves a particularly high degree of risk. Prospective investors should read the entire Prospectus, comprising of this Registration Document, the Securities Note dated 6 May 2021 and the Summary dated 6 May 2021, and, in particular, consider the risk factors set out in this Registration Document and the Securities Note when considering an investment in the Company. The Company has been severely impacted by the current outbreak of COVID-19. In a very short time period, the Company has lost most of its revenues and is in adverse financial distress. This has adversely and materially affected the Group’s contracts, rights and obligations, including financing arrangements, and the Group is not capable of complying with its ongoing obligations and is currently subject to event of default. On 18 November 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries applied for Examinership in Ireland (and were accepted into Examinership on 7 December 2020), and on 8 December 2020 the Company applied for and was accepted into Reconstruction in Norway. These processes were sanctioned by the Irish and Norwegian courts on 26 March 2021 and 12 April 2021 respectively, however remain subject to potential appeals in Norway (until 12 May 2021) and certain other conditions precedent, including but not limited to the successful completion of a capital raise in the amount of at least NOK 4,500 million (including the Rights Issue, the Private Placement and issuance of certain convertible hybrid instruments as described further herein).
    [Show full text]
  • Storebrand Livsforsikring AS Annual Report 2011
    Annual report 2011 Storebrand Livsforsikring AS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 2 | ANNUAL REPORT STOREBRAND LIVSFORSIKRING AS Contents Page 4 | Report of the board of directors Page 22 | Profit and loss account Page 24 | Statement of financial position Page 27 | Reconsiliation of change in equity Page 28 | Cash flow analysis Page 29 | Notes Page 114 | Actuary report Page 115 | Declaration by the members of the board and the CEO Page 116 | Audit report Page 118 | Control committee’s statement Page 119 | Board of representatives statement Page 120 | Terms and expressions ANNUAL REPORT STOREBRAND LIVSFORSIKRING AS | 3 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Report of the board of directors Storebrand Livsforsikring primarily operates in Norway and its head office is in Lysaker Park in the Municipality of Bærum. Storebrand’s position as a leading player in the Nordic occupational pension market strengt- hened through 2011. In addition, several strategic and organisational adjustments were im- plemented in order to increase focus on the retail market. The reason for this initiative is the transition from defined benefit to defined contribution occupational pension schemes, where the individual employees have a greater involvement. Business relationships give the Group a strategic advantage in the relationships established with company employees. OUTLOOK Fusion of corporate and retail markets The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution occupational pension schemes has led to both risks and investment options being transferred from employer to employee. In addi- tion, the pensions reform will lead to lower future pension payments for many employees. In sum, this increases both the need and interest in pensions and private savings significantly.
    [Show full text]