Boeing Environment Report 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division
Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 1 of 60 PageID #:3236 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) Case No. 19-cv-2394 AIRCRAFT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS John F. Hartmann, P.C. Joshua Z. Rabinovitz KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862-2000 Craig S. Primis Matt Owen KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20004 Counsel for Defendants Dated: June 30, 2020 Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:3237 Table Of Contents Preliminary Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 Facts Alleged In The Complaint And Subject To Judicial Notice .................................................. 4 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity A False Or Misleading Statement. .................. 8 A. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Design Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ....................... 11 B. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Safety Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ........................ 13 C. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ -
Cabin Air Quality on Non-Smoking Commercial Flights: a Review of Published Data on Airborne Pollutants
CABIN AIR QUALITY ON NON-SMOKING COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS: A REVIEW OF PUBLISHED DATA ON AIRBORNE POLLUTANTS Ruiqing Chen1, Lei Fang2, Junjie Liu1, Britta Herbig3, Victor Norrefeldt4, Florian Mayer4, Richard Fox5 and Pawel Wargocki2* 1 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, China 2 International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark 3 LMU University Hospital Munich, Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Germany 4 Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP, Holzkirchen Branch, Germany 5 Aircraft Environment Solutions Inc., USA * Corresponding author: email [email protected] Abstract We reviewed 47 documents published 1967-2019 that reported measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on commercial aircraft. We compared the measurements with the air quality standards and guidelines for aircraft cabins and in some cases buildings. Average levels of VOCs for which limits exist were lower than the permissible levels except for benzene with average concentration at 5.9±5.5 μg/m3. Toluene, benzene, ethylbenzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, limonene, nonanal, hexanal, decanal, octanal, acetic acid, acetone, ethanol, butanal, acrolein, isoprene and menthol were the most frequently appearing compounds. The concentrations of SVOCs (Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds) and other contaminants did not exceed standards and guidelines in buildings except for the average NO2 concentration at 12 ppb. Although the focus was on VOCs, we also retrieved the data on other parameters characterizing cabin environment. Ozone concentration averaged 38±30 ppb below the upper limit recommended for aircraft. The outdoor air supply rate ranged from 1.7 to 39.5 L/s per person and averaged 6.0±0.8 L/s/p (median 5.8 L/s/p), higher than the minimum level recommended for commercial aircraft. -
___, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION _________, on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) No. ____________ Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THE BOEING COMPANY, DENNIS A. ) MUILENBURG, GREGORY D. SMITH, ) and KEVIN McALLISTER, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS “The [ ] pilots should have been informed.”1 Jon Weaks (President of Southwest Airlines Pilots Association) I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a putative class action for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff ______ (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Plaintiff’s claims are brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly-traded securities of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) between January 8, 2019 and May 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged by the conduct asserted herein (the “Class”). 2. Defendants are: (i) Boeing; (ii) Boeing Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President Dennis A. Muilenburg; (iii) Boeing Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Executive Vice President of Enterprise Performance and Strategy Gregory D. Smith; and (iv) Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and CEO Kevin McAllister (collectively, “Defendants”). As alleged throughout herein, throughout the Class Period, Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (“Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder. 3. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon counsel’s investigation except as to the allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiff, which are based upon his personal knowledge. -
2016 Environmental Report
Build Something Cleaner The Boeing Company 2016 Environment Report OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX About The Boeing Company Total revenue in For five straight Currently holds 2015: $96.1 billion years, has been 15,600 active named a top global patents around Employs 160,000 innovator among the world people across the aerospace and United States and in defense companies Has customers in more than 65 other 150 countries countries Established 11 research and For more than a 21,500 suppliers development centers, decade, has been and partners 17 consortia and the No.1 exporter around the world 72 joint global in the United States research centers OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX At Boeing, we aspire to be the strongest, best and best-integrated aerospace-based company in the world— and a global industrial champion—for today and tomorrow. CONTENTS Our Approach 2 Design and Development 18 Manufacturing and Operations 28 In Service 38 End of Service 46 Jonathon Jorgenson, left, and Cesar Viray adjust drilling equipment on the 737 MAX robotic cell pulse line at Boeing’s fab- rication plant in Auburn, Washington. Automated production is helping improve the efficiency of aircraft manufacturing. (Boeing photo) 1 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX As Boeing celebrates Our Approach its first century, we are looking forward to the innovations of the next 100 years. We are working to be the most environmentally progressive aero- space company and an enduring global industrial champion. -
Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of Blended Wing Body Mav Design
IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308 COMPUTATIONAL AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BLENDED WING BODY MAV DESIGN Md. Akhtar khan1, Arjun Jagini2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, GITAM University, Hyderabad 2Analyst, emug technologies Limited, Hyderabad Abstract The Blended Wing Body (BWB) configuration has the potential to change the way subsonic transport airplanes are designed. In the past ten years, fuel efficiency and noise reduction have become the two biggest challenges for aircraft manufacturers. This paper deals with the computational aerodynamic analysis of a BWB airplane at subsonic speeds using Ansys CFD as a simulation tool and ICEM CFD as a modeling tool. The study will focus on the aerodynamic characteristics such as the pressure, velocity variation over the body at different angle of attack. We are also calculating the aerodynamic efficiency (lift force to drag force ratio) so that we can compare the performance of a BWB aircraft with a conventional aircraft. Keywords: Blended Wing Body (BWB), Hybrid Wing, Tetra Mesh, Square Cube Law, ICEM CFD ---------------------------------------------------------------------***-------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INTRODUCTION important advantage is the increased useful passenger space. By far the greatest of these advantages is the relatively large The current design of transport aircraft has not changed increase in payload per unit span. However, the BWB significantly in the past few decades; rather incremental design also introduces a number of challenges such as the design optimization has taken place on each new generation vastly increased sensitivity to center of gravity position, of aircraft. Growing environmental concerns and fuel prices static stability issues and the manufacturing difficulty. -
Aviation Week & Space Technology
STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa. -
1 in the United States District Court for the Northern
Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 1 of 51 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, ) Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of ) No. STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT ) AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND THE BOEING COMPANY, and ) ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, by her attorneys, brings this action for damages on behalf of herself and on behalf of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, her estate, heirs, survivors, next of kin and wrongful beneficiaries against Defendants THE BOEING COMPANY (“BOEING”) and ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC. (“ROSEMOUNT”) as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This action arises from the horrific crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 (“Flight 302”) on March 10, 2019 in which all 157 people on board lost their lives. The aircraft involved in Flight 302 was a BOEING 737 MAX 8. This crash came less than five months after Lion Air Flight JT 610—another BOEING 737 MAX 8—crashed into the Java Sea on October 29, 2018, killing all 189 onboard, due to the same or similar causes. 2. Investigation into both crashes is ongoing, but the similarities in the aircraft and the 1 Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 2 of 51 PageID #:2 investigative findings for the crashes thus far point to a common cause. Shortly after taking off and while attempting to climb, pilots for both aircraft reported flight control issues as the planes pitched up and down erratically throughout the sky. -
In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC VERSION HEAD OF THE NEW YORK STATE FILED ON: June 30, 2020 AND LOCAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NEW YORK STATE COMMON RETIREMENT FUND, and FIRE AND POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2020-0465-AGB KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN, MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI, ARTHUR D. COLLINS JR., EDWARD M. LIDDY, ADMIRAL EDMUND P. GIAMBASTIANI JR., DAVID L. CALHOUN, SUSAN C. SCHWAB, RONALD A. WILLIAMS, LAWRENCE W. KELLNER, LYNN J. GOOD, ROBERT A. BRADWAY, RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, CAROLINE B. KENNEDY, W. JAMES MCNERNEY JR., DENNIS A. MUILENBURG, KEVIN G. MCALLISTER, RAYMOND L. CONNER, GREG SMITH, J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, GREG HYSLOP, and DIANA L. SANDS, Defendants. and THE BOEING COMPANY, Nominal Defendant. VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT {FG-W0467081.} Plaintiffs Thomas P. DiNapoli, Comptroller of the State of New York, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Retirement System, and as Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, stockholders of The Boeing Company (“Boeing,” the “Company,” or “Nominal Defendant”), bring this action on Boeing’s behalf against the current and former officers and directors identified below (collectively, “Defendants”) arising from their failure to monitor the safety of Boeing’s 737 MAX airplanes. The allegations in this Complaint are based on the knowledge of Plaintiffs as to themselves, and on information and belief, including the review of publicly available information and documents obtained under 8 Del. -
Boeing Debuts 787-10 Dreamliner. the Boeing
50SKYSHADESImage not found or type unknown- aviation news BOEING DEBUTS 787-10 DREAMLINER News / Manufacturer Image not found or type unknown The Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner, the third member of the 787 Dreamliner family, made its debut at Boeing South Carolina. Thousands of employees at the North Charleston, S.C. site celebrated the event, along with U.S. President Donald Trump and South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster. “What’s happening here at Boeing South Carolina is a true American success story,” said Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing chairman, president and CEO. “In just a few short years, our © 2015-2021 50SKYSHADES.COM — Reproduction, copying, or redistribution for commercial purposes is prohibited. 1 team has transformed a greenfield site into a modern aerospace production facility that is delivering 787s to airlines all over the world and supporting thousands of U.S. jobs in the process.” The 787-10, built exclusively at Boeing South Carolina, will now be prepared for its first flight in the coming weeks. “This airplane, the most efficient in its class, is the result of years of hard work and dedication from our Boeing teammates, suppliers and community partners in South Carolina and across the globe,” said Kevin McAllister, Boeing Commercial Airplanes president and CEO. “We know our customers, including launch customer Singapore Airlines, are going to love what the 787-10 will do for their fleets, and we can’t wait to see them fly it.” Boeing will deliver the 787-10 to airlines in 2018. The airplane has won 149 orders from nine customers across the globe. The 787-10, the longest model of the Dreamliner family, will grow the nonstop routes opened by the 787-8 and 787-9 with unprecedented efficiency. -
FLYHT 2019 July Investor Presentation
July 2019 FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd. TSX.V: FLY OTCQX: FLYLF 1 TSX.V: FLY OTCQX: FLYLF Disclaimer www.flyht.com Forward Looking Statements This discussion includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” that are subject to risks and uncertainty. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this discussion, including, without limitation, those regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy, projected costs, future plans, projected revenues, objectives of management for future operations, the Company’s ability to meet any repayment obligations, the use of non-GAAP financial measures, trends in the airline industry, the global financial outlook, expanding markets, research and development of next generation products and any government assistance in financing such developments, foreign exchange rate outlooks, new revenue streams and sales projections, cost increases as related to marketing, research and development (including AFIRS 228), administration expenses, and litigation matters, may be or include forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on a number of reasonable assumptions regarding the Canadian, U.S., and global economic environments, local and foreign government policies/regulations and actions and assumptions made based upon discussions to date with the Company’s customers and advisers, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward- looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include production rates, timing for product deliveries and installations, Canadian, U.S., and foreign government activities, volatility of the aviation market for the Company’s products and services, factors that result in significant and prolonged disruption of air travel worldwide, U.S. -
South Carolina's Competitive EDGE Aerospace Industry
AEROSPACE INDUSTRY SOUTH CAROLINA TAKES FLIGHT AEROSPACE INDUSTRY 2 Boeing Soars to New ADDING VALUE TO YOUR WORKFORCE Heights in South Carolina The ROI of Military Hires 10 Youth Apprenticeship is a Big Win for Venture Aerobearings Today’s armed forces are a highly trained, motivated workforce. They bring leadership and management skills to the table — soft skills that are hardest to grow. Employers can teach business and industry skills, 12 Lockheed Martin: but service members arrive with the talent and proficiencies needed to take any organization to the next Flying High in SC for level. over 30 Years Active duty or retired, most veterans and service members embody certain core values unique to military service: attributes like discipline, battle-tested leadership, a solid work ethic, trainability, adaptability and 15 GKN: Making Things the ability to thrive under pressure. Fly in SC Employers and hiring managers can access this desirable workforce through Operation Palmetto 18 AMT South Carolina: Employment (OPE), South Carolina’s military hiring initiative. At no cost, OPE supports business owners Discovering the Keys and hiring managers by providing pre-screened military applicants based on your qualifications. There to Success are many opportunities to participate in military-specific job fairs and hiring events statewide. Companies that pledge to hire and retain South Carolina’s transitioning service members can also receive special recognition and training by applying to become a certified Palmetto Military Employer (PME). 21 Building Aerospace Training Capacity Across the State To learn more about how OPE can help increase your human capital, visit OperationPalmettoEmployment.sc.gov or call (803) 299-1713. -
MEDICAL GUIDELINES for AIRLINE TRAVEL 2Nd Edition
MEDICAL GUIDELINES FOR AIRLINE TRAVEL 2nd Edition Aerospace Medical Association Medical Guidelines Task Force Alexandria, VA VOLUME 74 NUMBER 5 Section II, Supplement MAY 2003 Medical Guidelines for Airline Travel, 2nd Edition A1 Introduction A1 Stresses of Flight A2 Medical Evaluation and Airline Special Services A2 Medical Evaluation A2 Airline Special Services A3 Inflight Medical Care A4 Reported Inflight Illness and Death A4 Immunization and Malaria Prophylaxis A5 Basic Immunizations A5 Supplemental Immunizations A5 Malaria Prophylaxis A6 Cardiovascular Disease A7 Deep Venous Thrombosis A8 Pulmonary Disease A10 Pregnancy and Air Travel A10 Maternal and Fetal Considerations A11 Travel and Children A11 Ear, Nose, and Throat A11 Ear A11 Nose and sinuses A12 Throat A12 Surgical Conditions A13 Neuropsychiatry A13 Neurological A13 Psychiatric A14 Miscellaneous Conditions B14 Air Sickness B14 Anemia A14 Decompression Illness A15 Diabetes A16 Jet Lag A17 Diarrhea A17 Fractures A18 Ophthalmological Conditions A18 Radiation A18 References Copyright 2003 by the Aerospace Medical Association, 320 S. Henry St., Alexandria, VA 22314-3579 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1984. Medical Guidelines for Airline Travel, 2nd ed. Aerospace Medical Association, Medical Guidelines Task Force, Alexandria, VA Introduction smoke, uncomfortable temperatures and low humidity, jet lag, and cramped seating (64). Nevertheless, healthy Each year approximately 1 billion people travel by air passengers endure these stresses which, for the most on the many domestic and international airlines. It has part, are quickly forgotten once the destination is been predicted that in the coming two decades, the reached.