DOCSLIB.ORG

In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 1 of 60 PageID #:3236 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) Case No. 19-cv-2394 AIRCRAFT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS John F. Hartmann, P.C. Joshua Z. Rabinovitz KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862-2000 Craig S. Primis Matt Owen KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20004 Counsel for Defendants Dated: June 30, 2020 Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:3237 Table Of Contents Preliminary Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 Facts Alleged In The Complaint And Subject To Judicial Notice .................................................. 4 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity A False Or Misleading Statement. .................. 8 A. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Design Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ....................... 11 B. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Safety Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ........................ 13 C. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About Information Provided To Pilots Were False Or Misleading. ..................... 20 D. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Statements Regarding Boeing’s Progress Toward, Or The Potential Timing Of, The 737 MAX’s Return To Service Were False Or Misleading. ..................................................... 23 E. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About Boeing’s Financial And Operational Performance Were False Or Misleading............................................................................................................. 28 II. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead Facts Giving Rise To A “Strong Inference” Of Scienter. .......... 30 A. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead Facts Giving Rise To A Cogent Inference Of Scienter. ................................................................................................................ 30 1. Plaintiffs Do Not Adequately Plead That Boeing Acted With Scienter. .................................................................................................... 31 2. Plaintiffs Do Not Adequately Plead That The Individual Defendants Acted With Knowledge That Any Statements They Made Were False Or Misleading. ............................................................. 31 3. Plaintiffs’ Circumstantial Allegations Do Not Support A Cogent Inference Of Scienter. ............................................................................... 35 B. The Most Compelling Inference From Plaintiffs’ Allegations Is That Defendants Did Not Act With Scienter. ............................................................... 44 III. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead Loss Causation............................................................................ 46 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 50 i Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 3 of 60 PageID #:3238 Table Of Authorities Cases Alizadeh v. Tellabs, 2015 WL 557249 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 9, 2015) ...............................................................................28 Anderson v. Abbott Labs., 140 F. Supp. 2d 894 (N.D. Ill. 2001) .......................................................................................28 Arbitrage Event-Driven Fund v. Tribune Media, 2020 WL 60186 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 2020) ..................................................................................26 Asher v. Baxter Int’l, 377 F.3d 727 (7th Cir. 2004) ...................................................................................................25 Bastian v. Petren, 892 F.2d 680 (7th Cir. 1990) ...................................................................................................46 Brody v. Transitional Hosps., 280 F.3d 997 (9th Cir. 2002) .....................................................................................................9 Carvelli v. Ocwen Financial Corp., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019) ...............................................................................................24 Cause of Action v. Chicago Transit Auth., 815 F.3d 267 (7th Cir. 2016) .....................................................................................................5 In re Ceridian Sec. Litig., 542 F.3d 240 (8th Cir. 2008) ...................................................................................................44 City of Livonia v. Boeing, 711 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2013) ...................................................................................................32 City of Monroe v. Bridgestone, 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005) .........................................................................................9, 16, 17 City of Westland v. MetLife, 129 F. Supp. 3d 48 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) ........................................................................................26 Davis v. SPSS, Inc., 385 F. Supp. 2d 697 (N.D. Ill. 2005) .......................................................................................26 Desai v. Gen. Growth Prop., 654 F. Supp. 2d 836 (N.D. Ill. 2009) .......................................................................................25 DiLeo v. Ernst & Young, 901 F.2d 624 (7th Cir. 1990) .........................................................................................8, 42, 45 ii Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 4 of 60 PageID #:3239 Dura Pharm. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336 (2005) .............................................................................................................8, 47 Fogel v. Vega, 759 F. App’x 18 (2d Cir. 2018) ...............................................................................................17 In re Ford Motor Company Securities Litigation, 381 F.3d 563 (6th Cir. 2004) .............................................................................................18, 28 Fulton Cty. Emps. v. MGIC Inv., 675 F.3d 1047 (7th Cir. 2012) .................................................................................................26 Gillis v. QRX Pharma, 197 F. Supp. 3d 557 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) ......................................................................................18 Glazer Capital v. Magistri, 549 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. 2008) ...................................................................................................36 Higginbotham v. Baxter Int’l, 495 F.3d 753 (7th Cir. 2007) .............................................................................................30, 39 Hirtenstein v. Cempra, Inc., 348 F. Supp. 3d 530 (M.D.N.C. 2018) ....................................................................................18 Institutional Inv’rs Grp. v. Avaya, Inc., 564 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 2009).....................................................................................................26 Katyle v. Penn Nat. Gaming, 637 F.3d 462 (4th Cir. 2011) ...................................................................................................49 Makor Issues & Rights v. Tellabs, 513 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 2008) .......................................................................................10, 30, 31 In re Maximus Sec. Litig., 2018 WL 4076359 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2018) ..........................................................................50 McCready v. eBay, 453 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2006) ...................................................................................................37 McDonald v. Kinder-Morgan, 287 F.3d 992 (10th Cir. 2002) .................................................................................................28 In re Midway Games Sec. Litig., 332 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (N.D. Ill. 2004) .................................................................................9, 26 Nguyen v. Endologix, __ F.3d __, 2020 WL 3069776 (9th Cir. June 10, 2020) ...................................................32, 45 iii Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 5 of 60 PageID #:3240 Nozak v. Northern Dynasty Minerals, 804 F. App’x 732 (9th Cir. 2020) ............................................................................................42 Omnicare v. Laborers District Council, 575 U.S. 175 (2015) ...............................................................................9, 10, 13, 19, 22, 26, 29 In re Omnicom Sec. Litig., 597 F.3d 501 (2d Cir. 2010).....................................................................................................49 Phillips v. Scientific-Atl., 374 F.3d 1015 (11th Cir. 2004) .........................................................................................30, 32 Pugh v. Tribune Co., 521 F.3d 686 (7th Cir. 2008) .................................................................................30, 34, 39, 44 Rahman v. Kid Brands, 736 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2013).....................................................................................................41 Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854 (5th Cir. 2003) ...................................................................................................24
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ___, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION _________, on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) No. ____________ Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THE BOEING COMPANY, DENNIS A. ) MUILENBURG, GREGORY D. SMITH, ) and KEVIN McALLISTER, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS “The [ ] pilots should have been informed.”1 Jon Weaks (President of Southwest Airlines Pilots Association) I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a putative class action for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff ______ (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Plaintiff’s claims are brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly-traded securities of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) between January 8, 2019 and May 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged by the conduct asserted herein (the “Class”). 2. Defendants are: (i) Boeing; (ii) Boeing Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President Dennis A. Muilenburg; (iii) Boeing Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Executive Vice President of Enterprise Performance and Strategy Gregory D. Smith; and (iv) Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and CEO Kevin McAllister (collectively, “Defendants”). As alleged throughout herein, throughout the Class Period, Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (“Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder. 3. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon counsel’s investigation except as to the allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiff, which are based upon his personal knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Environmental Report
    Build Something Cleaner The Boeing Company 2016 Environment Report OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX About The Boeing Company Total revenue in For five straight Currently holds 2015: $96.1 billion years, has been 15,600 active named a top global patents around Employs 160,000 innovator among the world people across the aerospace and United States and in defense companies Has customers in more than 65 other 150 countries countries Established 11 research and For more than a 21,500 suppliers development centers, decade, has been and partners 17 consortia and the No.1 exporter around the world 72 joint global in the United States research centers OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX At Boeing, we aspire to be the strongest, best and best-integrated aerospace-based company in the world— and a global industrial champion—for today and tomorrow. CONTENTS Our Approach 2 Design and Development 18 Manufacturing and Operations 28 In Service 38 End of Service 46 Jonathon Jorgenson, left, and Cesar Viray adjust drilling equipment on the 737 MAX robotic cell pulse line at Boeing’s fab- rication plant in Auburn, Washington. Automated production is helping improve the efficiency of aircraft manufacturing. (Boeing photo) 1 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX As Boeing celebrates Our Approach its first century, we are looking forward to the innovations of the next 100 years. We are working to be the most environmentally progressive aero- space company and an enduring global industrial champion.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Northern
    Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 1 of 51 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, ) Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of ) No. STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT ) AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND THE BOEING COMPANY, and ) ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, by her attorneys, brings this action for damages on behalf of herself and on behalf of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, her estate, heirs, survivors, next of kin and wrongful beneficiaries against Defendants THE BOEING COMPANY (“BOEING”) and ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC. (“ROSEMOUNT”) as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This action arises from the horrific crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 (“Flight 302”) on March 10, 2019 in which all 157 people on board lost their lives. The aircraft involved in Flight 302 was a BOEING 737 MAX 8. This crash came less than five months after Lion Air Flight JT 610—another BOEING 737 MAX 8—crashed into the Java Sea on October 29, 2018, killing all 189 onboard, due to the same or similar causes. 2. Investigation into both crashes is ongoing, but the similarities in the aircraft and the 1 Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 2 of 51 PageID #:2 investigative findings for the crashes thus far point to a common cause. Shortly after taking off and while attempting to climb, pilots for both aircraft reported flight control issues as the planes pitched up and down erratically throughout the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC VERSION HEAD OF THE NEW YORK STATE FILED ON: June 30, 2020 AND LOCAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NEW YORK STATE COMMON RETIREMENT FUND, and FIRE AND POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2020-0465-AGB KENNETH M. DUBERSTEIN, MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI, ARTHUR D. COLLINS JR., EDWARD M. LIDDY, ADMIRAL EDMUND P. GIAMBASTIANI JR., DAVID L. CALHOUN, SUSAN C. SCHWAB, RONALD A. WILLIAMS, LAWRENCE W. KELLNER, LYNN J. GOOD, ROBERT A. BRADWAY, RANDALL L. STEPHENSON, CAROLINE B. KENNEDY, W. JAMES MCNERNEY JR., DENNIS A. MUILENBURG, KEVIN G. MCALLISTER, RAYMOND L. CONNER, GREG SMITH, J. MICHAEL LUTTIG, GREG HYSLOP, and DIANA L. SANDS, Defendants. and THE BOEING COMPANY, Nominal Defendant. VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT {FG-W0467081.} Plaintiffs Thomas P. DiNapoli, Comptroller of the State of New York, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Retirement System, and as Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, stockholders of The Boeing Company (“Boeing,” the “Company,” or “Nominal Defendant”), bring this action on Boeing’s behalf against the current and former officers and directors identified below (collectively, “Defendants”) arising from their failure to monitor the safety of Boeing’s 737 MAX airplanes. The allegations in this Complaint are based on the knowledge of Plaintiffs as to themselves, and on information and belief, including the review of publicly available information and documents obtained under 8 Del.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Environment Report 2017
    THE BOEING COMPANY 2017 ENVIRONMENT REPORT BUILD SOMETHING CLEANER 1 ABOUT US Boeing begins its second century of business with a firm commitment to lead the aerospace industry into an environmentally progressive and sustainable future. Our centennial in 2016 marked 100 years of Meeting climate change and other challenges innovation in products and services that helped head-on requires a global approach. Boeing transform aviation and the world. The same works closely with government agencies, dedication is bringing ongoing innovation in more customers, stakeholders and research facilities efficient, cleaner products and operations for worldwide to develop solutions that help protect our employees, customers and communities the environment. around the globe. Our commitment to a cleaner, more sustainable Our strategy and actions reflect goals and future drives action at every level of the company. priorities that address the most critical environ- Every day, thousands of Boeing employees lead mental challenges facing our company, activities and projects that advance progress in customers and industry. Innovations that reducing emissions and conserving water and improve efficiency across our product lines resources. and throughout our operations drive reductions This report outlines the progress Boeing made in emissions and mitigate impacts on climate and challenges we encountered in 2016 toward change. our environmental goals and strategy. We’re reducing waste and water use in our In the face of rapidly changing business and facilities, even as we see our business growing. environmental landscapes, Boeing will pursue In addition, we’re finding alternatives to the innovation and leadership that will build a chemicals and hazardous materials in our brighter, more sustainable future for our products and operations, and we’re leading the employees, customers, communities and global development of sustainable aviation fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • 737 Max: Boeing's Crashes Expose Systemic Failings
    Pushing It to the Max Boeing's Crashes Expose Systemic Failings The crash of two Boeing 737 Max jets in the course of just months has created an existential crisis for the company. Were the 346 who died in Indonesia and Ethiopia the victims of shortcuts and cutthroat competition in the aviation industry? By DER SPIEGEL Staff 26.08.2019, 15∶43 Uhr Grounded 737 Max jets at Boeing Field in Seattle Lindsey Wasson/ REUTERS It took Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 about six minutes to travel from Addis Ababa to Ejere, a sprawling cluster of small farms on the edge of the Abyssinian highlands. By car, the journey takes around three hours and winds past unfinished buildings in the Ethiopian capital's southeastern suburbs before continuing down the immaculate, six-lane Addis Adama Expressway, which was built by the Chinese and opened in 2014. After the exit, there's a narrow, bumpy gravel road that's barely wide enough for a single car or carriage. It is out here that the scene of the accident can be found -- or the scene of the crime, depending on what investigators find. In this undulating terrain 2,000 meters (6562 feet) above sea level, the earth seems scorched. The only green comes from eucalyptus trees, which dot the landscape and provide precious shade for goatherds and their animals. Along the paths are head-high stalls that transform into storefronts come market day, when farmers sell their homemade schnapps. It's a barren region. 1 The crater the airplane made when it slammed into the ground at 8:44 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Global Environment Report Table of Contents
    THE BOEING COMPANY 2019 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairman’s Message 1 Leadership Message 3 Operating Environment 4 Award-Winning Performance 5 Cover photo: Excess carbon Forward-Looking Statements 6 fiber from Boeing’s airplane manufacturing operations Products 7 will be recycled into People 13 consumer products instead of ending up in the landfill. Planet 19 Photo above: Wind turbines Prioritization 23 at the Wild Horse Wind and Solar Facility in central Industry Analysis 25 Washington state. Two Boeing sites use 100 Environmental Strategy 26 percent renewable energy: Renton, Washington, Governance 29 home of the 737, and the Endnotes 30 787 Dreamliner factory in Charleston, South Carolina. CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS Dennis Muilenburg Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer In just over a decade, we’ve reduced KC-46A Pegasus tanker, whose quieter greenhouse gas emissions in our engines and fuel-efficient design enable production facilities by 28 percent while lower operating costs than the former increasing aircraft deliveries 66 percent. KC-135 Stratotanker. Looking to the future of mobility, our electric-powered, We’re pushing further with new fully autonomous passenger air vehicle technologies that will improve aerospace prototype started test flights this year. With efficiency and reduce emissions and the a range of up to 50 miles (81 km), it has environmental footprint of our products. the potential to shape the future of air travel You can see this demonstrated in our and transport. 787 Dreamliner, which uses 20 percent less fuel, and our 777X, which will be We’re also making strides in developing the world’s largest and most fuel-efficient sustainable business solutions, such as twin-aisle airplane when it takes to biofuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Frontiers Takes a Look at Some of the People from Across the Enterprise Who Also Say They Have the Best Job in the Company
    December 2006/January 2007 Volume V, Issue VIII www.boeing.com/frontiers GREAT JOB! Mike Duffy, an aerodynamics engineer in Philadelphia, says he has the best job at Boeing. Look inside to read more about him—and TECH’S ‘CHALLENGE’ others who say they have Warming to an important Boeing’s best job. program, amid Alaska’s chill. Center pullout, after Page 34 HOW YOU CAN HELP Jim McNerney: 5 things you can do to make Boeing better. Page 6 It takes an excellent company to do one thing well. It takes an extraordinary company to do many things well. Which is precisely why Boeing values its partnership with Cobham. A partnership that produces state-of-the-art results on projects ranging from Unmanned Air Vehicles to Future Combat Systems. One of the many things Cobham does well, is being a good partner. ` 1" = 1" = 1" Scale: 114803_a01 B & C F 11/17/06 PH This is the seventh in a series of new ads created to build awareness of Boeing and its many valuable partnerships in the United Kingdom. Boeing, the largest overseas customer of the UK aerospace industry, currently partners with more than 300 businesses and universities around the country. The advertising campaign has appeared in The Sunday Tımes, The Economist, New Statesman and other UK publications, and complements current Boeing business and communications activities in that nation. JOB NUMBER: BOEG-0000-M2457 Version: C FRONTIERS CLIENT: Boeing PRODUCT: Corporate Communications DIVISION: None Date: 11/17/06 4:39 PM Colors: Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, PDM: Scott Simpson File Name: m2457vC_r0_Cbhm_Frnt.indd Black Editor: Pat Owens Media: ADV Mag Fonts: Helvetica (Light Oblique, Light; Type 1), QC: Yanez Color Sp: 4C FRONTIERS Agenda (Light; Type 1) Images: m2457CT01_PgCbhm_HR_r2.eps (339 ppi), Print Producer: Kim Nosalik Scale: 1=1 Boeing-FNF_rev_ad-StPg.eps Traffi c Supervisor: Kelly Riordan Bleed: 8.875 in x 11.25 in Headline: Boeing and the curious..
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2013 the Boeing Company Earnings Conference Call On
    THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS EDITED TRANSCRIPT BA - Q4 2013 The Boeing Company Earnings Conference Call EVENT DATE/TIME: JANUARY 29, 2014 / 3:30PM GMT OVERVIEW: Boeing announced 2013 revenue of $87b on 4Q13 revenue of $23.8b. Core EPS was $7.07 in 2013 and $1.88 in 4Q13. Management guided to 2014 revenue of $87.5-90.5b and 2014 core EPS of $7.00-7.20. THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS | www.streetevents.com | Contact Us ©2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. 'Thomson Reuters' and the Thomson Reuters logo are registered trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies. JANUARY 29, 2014 / 3:30PM, BA - Q4 2013 The Boeing Company Earnings Conference Call CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Greg Smith Boeing Co - CFO Jim McNerney Boeing Co - Chairman and CEO Tom Downey Boeing Co - SVP, Corporate Communications CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Doug Harned Sanford C. Bernstein & Company, Inc. - Analyst Rob Spingarn Credit Suisse - Analyst Joe Nadol JPMorgan Chase & Co. - Analyst Carter Copeland Barclays Capital - Analyst Howard Rubel Jefferies & Company - Analyst Cai von Rumohr Cowen and Company - Analyst Peter Arment Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. - Analyst Ron Epstein BofA Merrill Lynch - Analyst Sam Pearlstein Wells Fargo Securities, LLC - Analyst Jon Ostrower The Wall Street Journal - Media Dominic Gates The Seattle Times - Media Al Scott Reuters - Media Andrew Parker Financial Times - Media Julie Johnsson Bloomberg - Media Josh Freed The Associated Press - Media PRESENTATION Operator Good day and welcome to the Boeing Company's fourth quarter and full-year 2013 earnings conference call.
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing and Embraer Form J-V by Gregory Polek
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.49 | No.8 $9.00 AUGUST 2018 | ainonline.com Orders flow at Farnborough As AIN went to press last month, airframers were raking in orders. The second day of the event continued the flurry of significant commercial airliner orders. The overall value totaled about $50 billion, taking the total value of new airliner contracts announced at the 2018 show close to $100 billion with a few trade days remaining. Aircraft Gulfstream G500 FAA certified page 6 Rotorcraft Fatigue fracture blamed in EC225 crash page 48 Pilot Report MARK WAGNER Avanti Evo delivers a smooth ride page 32 Boeing and Embraer form J-V by Gregory Polek Boeing will take an 80-percent share of annual pre-tax cost “synergies” of some Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg. “This Embraer’s commercial aviation business $150 million by its third year. important partnership clearly aligns with under the terms of a non-binding agree- The companies expect completion of Boeing’s long-term strategy of investing ment announced on July 5. The memo- the financial and operational details of the in organic growth and returning value to randum of understanding proposes the partnership and negotiation of transac- continues on page 9 formation of a joint venture meant to “stra- tion agreements to continue “in the com- tegically align” the companies’ commercial ing months.” The transaction would then Read Our SPECIAL REPORT development, production, marketing, and remain subject to shareholder and regu- lifecycle services operations. Under the latory approvals, including approval from terms of the agreement, Boeing will hold the government of Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    Frontierswww.boeing.com/frontiers SEPTEMBER 2010 / Volume IX, Issue V Cyber secure Protecting vital information networks is a fast-growing market for Boeing BOEING FRONTIERS / SEPTEMBER 2010 Frontiers Publisher: Tom Downey Editorial director: Anne Toulouse EDITORIAL TEAM Executive editor: Paul Proctor: 312-544-2938 Editor: James Wallace: 312-544-2161 table of contents Managing editor: INSIDE Vineta Plume: 312-544-2954 Service tradition Art and design director: Brandon Luong: 312-544-2118 Boeing employees in Utah have earned 16 a reputation for taking on a variety of work Graphic designer: 32 Changing lives 07 Leadership Message and performing well, whether it’s building Rick Moore: 314-233-5758 Boeing volunteers from around the world, along with family and friends, took time Boeing Defense, Space & Security parts of the company’s commercial Photo director: out on July 17 to change lives by helping build homes, work with young people has a bold vision for future growth as Bob Ferguson: 312-544-2132 jetliners or supporting defense programs. in schools, serve meals in homeless shelters and perform many other community Salt Lake City also is the only Boeing site it works to expand its core business Commercial Airplanes editor: services. It was all part of Boeing’s first Global Day of Service, which was timed to in the United States that sends no waste and reposition in a time of constrained Don Smith: 206-766-1329 commemorate the company’s founding in mid-July 1916. PHoto: JESSICA OYANAGI/BOEING to landfills—what doesn’t become an Defense, Space & Security editor: defense budgets.
    [Show full text]