DOCSLIB.ORG

CONTRACT AGGRESSORS USAF Bets on Privatizing Red Air

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Re-Engining the BUFF 38 | Pilot Training Revamp 30 | Adaptable Munitions 46 CONTRACT AGGRESSORS USAF Bets On Privatizing Red Air. 24 Jan/Feb 2019 $8 Published by the Air Force Association GTP_10229_AirForce Magazine Ad_v09.indd 1 1/11/19 2:33 PM STAFF Publisher Larry O. Spencer January / February 2019. Vol. 102, No. 1 Editor in Chief Tobias Naegele Managing Editor Juliette Kelsey Chagnon Editorial Director John A. Tirpak News Editor Amy McCullough Assistant DEPARTMENTS FEATURES SrA. Austin Managing Editor McCullough Chequita Wood 2 Editorial: US 24 Red Air Rising inspects a Needs a Cyber By Amy McCullough B-52 engine at Senior Designer Deterrence Can contracting out the adversary air mission ease Barksdale AFB, La. Dashton Parham Plan the pilot shortage and enhance combat training? An See “Re-Engining Pentagon Editor E ective cyber emerging industry says it can. the B-52,” p. 38. Brian W. Everstine deterrence Digital Platforms requires the will Photo by A1C Sydney 30 The Future of Pilot Training Campbell Editor and capacity By Brian Everstine Jennifer-Leigh to respond to Oprihory cyber attacks Low-cost simulators, new trainers, and Red Flag with an equal or reforms aim to help USAF gear up for future great Production greater blow. power conflicts. Manager Eric Chang Lee 4 Letters Photo Editor 5 Index to 38 Re-Engining the B-52 Mike Tsukamoto Advertisers By John A. Tirpak With the BUFF set to serve through 2050, new 8 Airframes Contributors power plants are essential. 14 Verbatim John T. Correll, Robert S. Dudney, 15 Aperture 43 Saving a Blackbird Jason Healey, Paying a high By Jennifer-Leigh Oprihory Jennifer Hlad, Col. price for the Air Matthew Hurley, Force we need. Four Swedish pilots put themselves between a crippled USAF SR-71 and Soviet air-to-air missiles, Marc V. Schanz , 17 Forward potentially thwarting a lethal international incident. Maj. Gen. Lawrence Deployed Stutzreim Strengthining ties in the Indo- 46 Adaptable Munitions: Time for a Revolution Pacific. ADVERTISING: By Maj. Gen. Lawrence Stutzreim, Col. Matthew Kirk Bown 18 World: USAF Hurley, with Marc V. Schanz 703.247.5829 accepts flawed The Mitchell Institute argues for a new generation of [email protected] tanker; Base in weapons that can instantly tailor their e ects to any SUBSCRIBE a Box; Mattis given need. Farewell; and & SAVE more ... ON THE COVER Subscribe to 51 From Cybernetics to Cyberspace Air Force Magazine 23 Faces in the and save big o News By Jason Healy The roots of digital warfare date back to the birth of the cover price, 60 AFA Elected plus get a free National the US Air Force. membership Leaders to the Air Force 61 Airman For 56 U-2 Down Association. Life: AFA By John T. Correll 1-800-727-3337 Chapter News; “We have parts of the plane,” Khrushchev said. “We B-24 crew deals also have the pilot.” The US could no longer deny An A-4 Skyhawk with a nightmare the truth about a lost spy plane. flown by Draken at 16,000 feet. International. See “Red Air Rising,” 64 Namesakes: p. 24. McGuire Photo by Javier Rodríguez Air Force Magazine (ISSN 0730-6784) January/February 2019 (Vol. 102, No. 1) is published monthly, except for two double issues in January/February and July/August, by the Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Phone (703) 247-5800. Periodical postage paid at Arlington, Va., and additional mailing o ices. Membership Rate: $50 per year; $35 e-Membership; $125 for three-year membership. Subscription Rate: $50 per year; $29 per year additional for postage to foreign addresses (except Canada and Mexico, which are $10 per year additional). Regular issues $8 each. USAF Almanac issue $18 each. Change of address requires four weeks’ notice. Please include mailing label. POSTMASTER: Send changes of address to Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209-1198. Publisher assumes no responsibility for unsolicited material. Trademark registered by Air Force Association. Copyright 2018 by Air Force Association. JANUARY/FEBRUARY AIRFORCEMAG.COM EDITORIAL By Tobias Naegele US Needs a Cyber Deterrence Plan Americans have a love aair with airplanes. We love their power new twists on classic spy techniques and pose potentially serious and grace and marvel at their roar over air shows. We pay far less risks to American economic and national security. attention to rockets and satellites and even less to the invisible and Consider the data breach at the Oice of Personnel Management dark art of cyber. These things are harder to see and understand. in 2014. The hackers got access to millions of records. But what They are every bit as important to the Air Force. As the US worries intelligence insiders most was not what was taken. It was military ponders a future of peer competition, that future can be what might have been left behind that wasn’t there before. expected to meld air, space, and cyber. USAF’s ability to exert power The uproar over Russia’s influence campaigns before and since is predicated on our strengths in those other domains. the 2016 elections provides an inkling of how fear and doubt can Since World War II, it’s been Air Force doctrine that wars are won undermine trust in even the institutions most fundamental to our by taking the fight to the people. Attacking and disabling electric democracy. grids disrupts a society’s ability to function. When societies can’t In this digital age, where computers “in the cloud” help us make function, they are more likely to give up. In both Kuwait and Kosovo, decisions and even find our way home, it’s communications net- this was a key part of the US strategy. works, rather than power, that are now preeminent. We can survive At home, our own sensitivity to power outages is a major national a power outage as long as we can charge our phones in the car. weakness. “Surviving a Catastrophic Power Outage,” a new report Shut down the web, however, and we’re deaf, dumb, and blind. from the President’s National Infrastructure Advisory Council, Among our nation’s greatest strengths are our robust, indepen- identifies the problems and oers a series of reforms to strengthen dent financial system and our dynamic, innovative technology the resilience of that grid. sector. Together they have contributed to building the world’s Until that’s done, we can look forward to more events like these: largest economy and among its most eicient. But our overwhelm- ■ A local Ohio blackout in 2003 triggered a chain reaction ing reliance on both is our greatest vulnerability. No surprise then that took out 21 power plants in three minutes, plunging that a recent Council of Foreign Relations’ survey of 500 Baltimore, Detroit, Cleveland, New York, Ottawa, Toronto, “Eective experts said the greatest threat facing the US homeland and other cities into darkness and sparking fears of a cyber is “a highly disruptive cyberattack on US critical infra- terrorist strike. It took two days for most locations to structure and networks.” recover. deterrence It’s not the military’s role to defend every civilian ■ Hurricane Maria destroyed Puerto Rico’s aging requires network. The line between military and civilian networks electric grid in 2017; the resulting power failure, which the will and is getting thinner and grayer. The military increasingly took 11 months to fix completely, was later blamed for as relies on commercial satellites, technology, logistics, many as 3,000 deaths over the next six months. capacity to and network services. There are major national security ■ Hurricane Michael flattened the Florida panhandle respond to implications to commercial infrastructure breakdowns. last fall, leveling Tyndall Air Force Base, and causing Air a cyber Yet the United States has been vague about how Force Chief of Sta Gen. David L. Goldfein to equate the attack with it might respond in the event of a major cyber attack. storm with a surprise attack. That’s a good way to think Ambiguity has some advantages. If a rival doesn’t know about these things. an equal how you might act, he might not be willing to take the risk Yet in an increasingly connected world, failure of our or greater to find out. On the other hand, if the rival underestimates digital systems and networks is an even greater risk than blow.” the potential response, the US could find itself mired in power disruption. Today, almost every industrial system, an otherwise avoidable conflict. from water systems and power plants to air-conditioning Cyber warfare is both oensive and defensive. Attack- systems and elevators, is remotely controlled and monitored via ers will continue unrestrained unless they face a credible threat computer software and hardware. Called SCADA, for Supervisory of retaliation. To be credible, however, US cyber warriors must be Control and Data Acquisition, these systems make up what might able to do two things: unambiguously assign blame and deliver an be called the industrial Internet. even more devastating blow in response to any attack. In January, the Wall Street Journal documented in stunning detail Assigning blame in cyber is complicated. While practitioners how Russian hackers sought to penetrate the computer networks exhibit signature moves and patterns, they also work hard to mask of US electric utilities by attacking not the utilities themselves, but activities and their origins. US cyber warriors must get better and contractors and subcontractors. The cyberattack targeted com- faster at attributing attacks, and the national leadership must be panies in 24 states, Canada, and Great Britain using deception to bolder and more willing to take action in response to attacks.
Recommended publications
  • Cold War Infrastructure for Air Defense: the Fighter and Command Missions

    Cold War Infrastructure for Air Defense: the Fighter and Command Missions

    COLD WAR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AIR DEFENSE: THE FIGHTER AND COMMAND MISSIONS Prepared for Headquarters, Air Combat Command Langley Air Force Base, Virginia November 1999 Table of Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................v List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................vii Introduction......................................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1: Cold War Events and the Operational Infrastructure of the Air Force.....................................1 1946-1950......................................................................................................................................1 The Germans ..............................................................................................................................1 The Major Commands and First Generation Infrastructure .............................................................3 ADC and ANG........................................................................................................................4 SAC .......................................................................................................................................5 The 1950s.......................................................................................................................................6
  • In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division

    In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division

    Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 1 of 60 PageID #:3236 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) Case No. 19-cv-2394 AIRCRAFT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS John F. Hartmann, P.C. Joshua Z. Rabinovitz KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862-2000 Craig S. Primis Matt Owen KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20004 Counsel for Defendants Dated: June 30, 2020 Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:3237 Table Of Contents Preliminary Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 Facts Alleged In The Complaint And Subject To Judicial Notice .................................................. 4 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity A False Or Misleading Statement. .................. 8 A. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Design Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ....................... 11 B. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Safety Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ........................ 13 C. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’
  • ___, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly

    ___, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION _________, on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) No. ____________ Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THE BOEING COMPANY, DENNIS A. ) MUILENBURG, GREGORY D. SMITH, ) and KEVIN McALLISTER, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS “The [ ] pilots should have been informed.”1 Jon Weaks (President of Southwest Airlines Pilots Association) I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a putative class action for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff ______ (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Plaintiff’s claims are brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly-traded securities of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) between January 8, 2019 and May 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged by the conduct asserted herein (the “Class”). 2. Defendants are: (i) Boeing; (ii) Boeing Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President Dennis A. Muilenburg; (iii) Boeing Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Executive Vice President of Enterprise Performance and Strategy Gregory D. Smith; and (iv) Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and CEO Kevin McAllister (collectively, “Defendants”). As alleged throughout herein, throughout the Class Period, Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (“Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder. 3. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon counsel’s investigation except as to the allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiff, which are based upon his personal knowledge.
  • 2016 Environmental Report

    2016 Environmental Report

    Build Something Cleaner The Boeing Company 2016 Environment Report OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX About The Boeing Company Total revenue in For five straight Currently holds 2015: $96.1 billion years, has been 15,600 active named a top global patents around Employs 160,000 innovator among the world people across the aerospace and United States and in defense companies Has customers in more than 65 other 150 countries countries Established 11 research and For more than a 21,500 suppliers development centers, decade, has been and partners 17 consortia and the No.1 exporter around the world 72 joint global in the United States research centers OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX At Boeing, we aspire to be the strongest, best and best-integrated aerospace-based company in the world— and a global industrial champion—for today and tomorrow. CONTENTS Our Approach 2 Design and Development 18 Manufacturing and Operations 28 In Service 38 End of Service 46 Jonathon Jorgenson, left, and Cesar Viray adjust drilling equipment on the 737 MAX robotic cell pulse line at Boeing’s fab- rication plant in Auburn, Washington. Automated production is helping improve the efficiency of aircraft manufacturing. (Boeing photo) 1 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX As Boeing celebrates Our Approach its first century, we are looking forward to the innovations of the next 100 years. We are working to be the most environmentally progressive aero- space company and an enduring global industrial champion.
  • Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations

    Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations

    Economic Impact Of Arizona’s Principal Military Operations 2008 Prepared by In collaboration with Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY 1 METHODOLOGY Chapter Two DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 11 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Three EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING AT ARIZONA’S 27 PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Four ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 32 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Five STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM 36 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Six COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN 38 ARIZONA Chapter Seven COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN FY 43 2000 AND FY 2005 APPENDICES Appendix One HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 Appendix Two RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-6 Appendix Three ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-7 Appendix Four DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-19 Appendix Five REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-22 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Summary of Basic Personnel Statistics 27 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-2 Summary of Military Retiree Statistics 28 Arizona Principal Military Operations Table 3-3 Summary of Payroll and Retirement Benefits 30 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-4 Summary of Spending Statistics 31 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 4-1 Summary of Statewide Economic Impacts 34 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 5-1 Summary of Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 5-2 Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 6-1 Comparison of Major Industries / Employers in Arizona 41 Table 7-1 Comparison of Military Industry Employment in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 Table 7-2 Comparison of Military Industry Economic Output in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation Arizona’s Principal Military Operations Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
  • Air Defence in Northern Europe

    Air Defence in Northern Europe

    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Pekka Sivonen, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 10 AIR DEFENCE IN NORTHERN EUROPE Heikki Nikunen National Defence College Helsinki 1997 ISBN 951-25-0873-7 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1997: National Defence College All rights reserved Oy Edita Ab Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1997 INTRODUCTION The historical progress of air power has shown a continuous rising trend. Military applications emerged fairly early in the infancy of aviation, in the form of first trials to establish the superiority of the third dimension over the battlefield. Well- known examples include the balloon reconnaissance efforts made in France even before the birth of the aircraft, and it was not long before the first generation of flimsy, underpowered aircraft were being tested in a military environment. The Italians used aircraft for reconnaissance missions at Tripoli in 1910-1912, and the Americans made their first attempts at taking air power to sea as early as 1910-1911.
  • Know the Past ...Shape the Future

    Know the Past ...Shape the Future

    FALL 2018 - Volume 65, Number 3 WWW.AFHISTORY.ORG know the past .....Shape the Future The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
  • 46 AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SQ.Docx

    46 AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SQ.Docx

    46th AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SQUADRON (BOMARC) LINEAGE Organized 1 JAN 1959 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron (BOMARC) STATIONS HURLBURT FIELD, FL McGuire AFB, NJ, 1 Jan 1959-31 Oct 1972 ASSIGNMENTS WEAPON SYSTEMS BOMARC COMMANDERS LTC Ernest B. Shepard, #1960 HONORS Service Streamers Campaign Streamers Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers Decorations EMBLEM EMBLEM SIGNIFICANCE MOTTO NICKNAME OPERATIONS Organized on paper 1 January 1959, the 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron became a reality on 25 March 1959, when the Commanding Officer, Lt. Col. Ernest B. Shepard and other key personnel arrived at Hurlburt Field, Florida. The new squadron was composed of cross-trainees, factory trainees, retrainees, and a few other strains. The Unit Training Program, with the 4751st Air Defense Missile Squadron technicians acting as instructors, was established for a four months duration. The training program was divided into three phases. During the first phase, the new "Cadre" missilemen were indoctrinated in the Air Defense structure of which the Bomarc IM-99A Weapons System would become an integral part, and delved into the varied aspects of missile operations. Detailed explanation was given of the SAGE, (the controlling agency), Bomarc maintenance and supply concepts, health hazards, and ground safety. In the second phase, the men of the 46th entered into "Team Training" with their 4751st counterparts; working side by side to obtain specific job knowledge of the complex systems. The third and final phase unfolded when Major James C. Cuddington, 46th ADMS Executive Officer, received a Flag Order directing the 46th to accept, maintain, and process four Bomarc missiles into a firing configuration.
  • Saab HX Media Brief at Kauhava, Finland

    Saab HX Media Brief at Kauhava, Finland

    SAAB HX UPDATE IN CONJUNCTION TO THE KAUHAVA AIRSHOW MEDIA BRIEF, KAUHAVA, FINLAND On site and live broadcast, August 28th 2020 11:30-12:30 (GMT+2) Welcome and introductions Anders Gardberg Country Manager, Finland 2 Agenda • Welcome and introduction Anders Gardberg, Country Manager Finland • CEO perspectives Micael Johansson, President and CEO of Saab • Saab and the HX programme Magnus Skogberg, Campaign Director HX • Gripen and GlobalEye for Finland • A Swedish Air Force perspective Col. Carl-Fredrik Edström, Chief Operations, Swedish Air Force • on Gripen and Finnish-Swedish cooperation • Concluding words and questions • End of press briefing at 12:30 After-talk and guided live-tour at Kauhava Airshow offered to our on-line viewers 3 Saab started in 1937 with the aim to ensure Security of Supply… 4 …also supporting Finland in the Winter War with the assembly of Brewster and Fiat fighters… 5 Saab’s broad portfolio 6 Continuing from 1946, supporting Finnish Defence Forces with high- tech products for all services … 7 Saab in Finland today • Growing from 70 to 130 employees since 2015, recruitments ongoing • Saab Finland Oy Helsinki, Tampere, Turku 40 employees • Combitech Oy, Tampere, Espoo, Jyväskylä, Säkylä 90 employees • Strategic research co-operation with Aalto University since 2017 • Long term research - advanced electronics, microwave technology, AI, hydro-acoustics • Technology Centre, Tampere – part of Saab’s global R&D organization • Competence centre for advanced EW capabilities • C2/9LV System Centre being established as
  • B-133102 Further Improvement Needed in Assisting Military

    B-133102 Further Improvement Needed in Assisting Military

    . c i-. t?i - I y. Y 0 E-4 aI S t2D .- u S I I- in .-s v, .- LL s 2 Q a S Iz , COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548 B-l 33102 To the President of the Senate and the ..- Speaker of the House of Representatives We are reporting on the need for further improvement in assisting military personnel in finding adequate housing near bases to which they are assigned. We made our review pursuant to the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. 53), and the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 67). Copies of this report are being sent to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Secretary of Defense. Comptroller General of the United States Contents Page DIGEST 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 HRO functions 3 Joint or coordinated HROs 5 2 PROGRAMEFFECTIVENESS IMPAIRED 6 DOD apprised of the problem 8 Conclusions 8 3 NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTOF DOCUMENTATIONSUP- PORTING HRO REPORTING 10 Army 10 Fort Sam Houston 10 Fort Dix 10 Navy 11 Air Force Bases 11 Conclusions 11 Agency comments and GAO evaluation 12 4 INCIDENCE OF ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION IN COM- MUNITY HOUSING 13 Instances of unreported cases of alleged discrimination 13 Excessive time lapse before investiga- tion of cases at Fort Sam Houston 15 Conclusion 17 Agency comments and GAO evaluation 17 5 NEED FOR INCREASED EMPHASIS ON OBTAINING WRITTEN ASSURANCESOF OPEN HOUSING POLICY FROM LANDLORDSAND RELATED MATTERS 19 Need for updating assurances 19 Naval Air Station, Alameda 19 Naval Station, Treasure Island 20 CHAPTER Page Continued occupancy of sanctioned
  • 2017-18 Big Ten Records Book

    2017-18 Big Ten Records Book

    2017-18 BIG TEN RECORDS BOOK Big Life. Big Stage. Big Ten. BIG TEN CONFERENCE RECORDS BOOK 2017-18 70th Edition FALL SPORTS Men’s Cross Country Women’s Cross Country Field Hockey Football* Men’s Soccer Women’s Soccer Volleyball WINTER SPORTS SPRING SPORTS Men's Basketball* Baseball Women's Basketball* Men’s Golf Men’s Gymnastics Women’s Golf Women’s Gymnastics Men's Lacrosse Men's Ice Hockey* Women's Lacrosse Men’s Swimming and Diving Rowing Women’s Swimming and Diving Softball Men’s Indoor Track and Field Men’s Tennis Women’s Indoor Track and Field Women’s Tennis Wrestling Men’s Outdoor Track and Field Women’s Outdoor Track and Field * Records appear in separate publication 4 CONFERENCE PERSONNEL HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Faculty Representatives Basketball Coaches - Men’s 1997-2004 Ron Turner 1896-1989 Henry H. Everett 1906 Elwood Brown 2005-2011 Ron Zook 1898-1899 Jacob K. Shell 1907 F.L. Pinckney 2012-2016 Tim Beckman 1899-1906 Herbert J. Barton 1908 Fletcher Lane 2017- Lovie Smith 1906-1929 George A. Goodenough 1909-1910 H.V. Juul 1929-1936 Alfred C. Callen 1911-1912 T.E. Thompson Golf Coaches - Men’s 1936-1949 Frank E. Richart 1913-1920 Ralph R. Jones 1922-1923 George Davis 1950-1959 Robert B. Browne 1921-1922 Frank J. Winters 1924 Ernest E. Bearg 1959-1968 Leslie A. Bryan 1923-1936 J. Craig Ruby 1925-1928 D.L. Swank 1968-1976 Henry S. Stilwell 1937-1947 Douglas R. Mills 1929-1932 J.H. Utley 1976-1981 William A.
  • Best Practices Study 2014

    Best Practices Study 2014

    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................