DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Environmental Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Environmental Report Build Something Cleaner The Boeing Company 2016 Environment Report OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX About The Boeing Company Total revenue in For five straight Currently holds 2015: $96.1 billion years, has been 15,600 active named a top global patents around Employs 160,000 innovator among the world people across the aerospace and United States and in defense companies Has customers in more than 65 other 150 countries countries Established 11 research and For more than a 21,500 suppliers development centers, decade, has been and partners 17 consortia and the No.1 exporter around the world 72 joint global in the United States research centers OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX At Boeing, we aspire to be the strongest, best and best-integrated aerospace-based company in the world— and a global industrial champion—for today and tomorrow. CONTENTS Our Approach 2 Design and Development 18 Manufacturing and Operations 28 In Service 38 End of Service 46 Jonathon Jorgenson, left, and Cesar Viray adjust drilling equipment on the 737 MAX robotic cell pulse line at Boeing’s fab- rication plant in Auburn, Washington. Automated production is helping improve the efficiency of aircraft manufacturing. (Boeing photo) 1 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX As Boeing celebrates Our Approach its first century, we are looking forward to the innovations of the next 100 years. We are working to be the most environmentally progressive aero- space company and an enduring global industrial champion. We can get there, despite the very real challenges we face. Increases in carbon dioxide concentration are expected to lead to rising global temperatures and climate changes. Climate change is a global challenge. Aviation is a global industry, accounting for about 2 percent of total manmade carbon dioxide emissions, and therefore global action is required to meet the challenge. We work with stakeholders around the world to inspire global collaboration and create industrywide solutions The Boeing throughout the aviation life cycle. ecoDemonstrator Program plays a key role in the These solutions start in the heart company’s environmental of our operations, where we work strategy by using flight to find solutions every day. testing to accelerate new technologies that can Join us as we build something reduce emissions and better, cleaner and more efficient. noise, improve airlines’ gate-to-gate efficiency and help meet other environmental goals. (Boeing photo) 2 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX Dennis Muilenburg Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Ursula English Vice President, Environment, Health & Safety Leadership Message In 2016—a year when Boeing marks its centennial—we proudly reflect on and celebrate our company’s role in connecting people around the world, protecting nations and promoting global stability, exploring the universe and inspiring the next generation of innovators. We look forward with great excite- with global partners and support ment to our next century and the international efforts to reduce aviation innovations yet to come—including emissions, all of which contribute to important work to improve our creating healthier communities where environmental performance as we live and work. described in this year’s report. True environmental leadership Strong environmental performance requires constant improvement. is necessary to ensuring a healthy Accordingly, we continue to improve planet and our long-term business efficiency and reduce environmental success. That’s why we aim for impact as we design, build, deliver nothing less than to be the most and support commercial aircraft and environmentally progressive defense and space products. The aerospace company and a leader Boeing 787 Dreamliner, for example, among a broader group of our is the most fuel-efficient airplane in its industrial peers. In the past year we class, reducing fuel use and carbon continued to improve the efficiency dioxide emissions by 20 to 25 percent of our products and services, reduce compared to airplanes it replaces. waste within our operations and Since entry into service in 2011, manufacturing facilities, collaborate those efficiencies have resulted in 3 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX more than 7.7 billion pounds (3.5 bil- is critical to meeting the aviation lion kilograms) of fuel saved. And last industry’s aggressive environmental year, the Boeing-built 702SP became goals for carbon dioxide emissions the world’s first operational all-electric and other standards, which our propulsion satellite, using non- newest commercial airplanes are hazardous elements to extend overall designed to meet and even exceed. service life for our customers. With a passion for progress and In our factories and offices, we are achievement inspired by our founders focused on continuing to reduce 100 years ago, Boeing and its 160,000 greenhouse gas emissions, hazardous employees around the world are com- waste generation, solid waste to mitted to investing in technologies, landfill and water intake. We reduced partnerships and ideas that advance each measure between 6 and 11 per- human development, improve environ- cent between 2012 and 2015, while mental performance and inspire the increasing our airplane production world in our second century. rates and growing our operations. For these and other efforts, this year we received the ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year–Sustained Excellence Award from the U.S. Environmental Dennis Muilenburg Protection Agency. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Additionally, since this opportunity is bigger than any one company, we seek to inspire the global collaboration needed to solve complex environmental challenges. Ursula English For instance, we are working with Vice President, our customers, industry partners, Environment, Health & Safety governments, research institutions, engine manufacturers and others to develop and one day commercialize sustainable aviation fuel. This effort An artist’s rendering of an ABS-3A all-electric propulsion satellite on-orbit and operating in space. (Boeing image) 4 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX Major assembly of the first 787-10 Dreamliner is underway; it’s the latest major milestone in the development of the newest member of the super-efficient 787 family. (Boeing photo) 5 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX Forward-Looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to risks, uncertainties and Statements changes in circumstances that are This report contains “forward-looking difficult to predict. Many factors could statements” within the meaning cause actual results to differ materially of the Private Securities Litigation and adversely from these forward- Reform Act of 1995. Words such as looking statements. “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” Additional information concerning “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” these and other factors can be found “estimates,” “targets,” “anticipates” in our filings with the Securities and similar expressions are used and Exchange Commission, including to identify these forward-looking our most recent Annual Report statements. on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Examples of forward-looking Form 10-Q and Current Reports statements include statements on Form 8-K. Any forward-looking relating to our future financial statement speaks only as of the date condition and operating results, as on which it is made, and we assume well as any other statement that does no obligation to update or revise any not directly relate to any historical forward-looking statement, whether or current fact. Forward-looking as a result of new information, future statements are based on our current events or otherwise, except as expectations and assumptions, which required by law. may not prove to be accurate. These Boeing employees and their families participated in 178 events across 15 countries as part of Earth Day and World Environment Day in 2015. (Boeing photo) 6 OUR APPROACH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING AND OPERATIONS IN SERVICE END OF SERVICE APPENDIX Our Governance Reviews by the EHS Policy Council organization comprises functions Engineers Nalaka and a functional review with the focused on workplace safety and Kahawatte, left, and Our company’s environmental chairman, president and chief health, environmental performance Ngoc Huynh use innovative design strategies and strategy and policies are guided by executive officer are conducted and regulatory compliance. The team the Environment, Health & Safety tools to help improve the twice a year. Progress and status also works with our business unit efficiency and environ- (EHS) Policy Council, composed of are reported through each of these and operational leaders to drive an mental performance of Boeing’s Executive Council and venues in addition to other internal integrated, enterprisewide strategy Boeing aircraft. led by the chairman, president and executive reviews across the that includes our products, services, (Boeing photo) chief executive officer. company. One Policy Council meeting processes and operations. each year is focused on setting The Policy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division
    Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 1 of 60 PageID #:3236 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IN RE THE BOEING COMPANY ) Case No. 19-cv-2394 AIRCRAFT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) Hon. John J. Tharp, Jr. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS John F. Hartmann, P.C. Joshua Z. Rabinovitz KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 (312) 862-2000 Craig S. Primis Matt Owen KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20004 Counsel for Defendants Dated: June 30, 2020 Case: 1:19-cv-02394 Document #: 164 Filed: 06/30/20 Page 2 of 60 PageID #:3237 Table Of Contents Preliminary Statement ..................................................................................................................... 1 Facts Alleged In The Complaint And Subject To Judicial Notice .................................................. 4 Argument ........................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity A False Or Misleading Statement. .................. 8 A. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Design Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ....................... 11 B. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’ Statements About The Safety Of The 737 MAX Were False Or Misleading. ........................ 13 C. Plaintiffs Do Not Plead With Particularity That Defendants’
    [Show full text]
  • ___, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION _________, on behalf of himself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) No. ____________ Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THE BOEING COMPANY, DENNIS A. ) MUILENBURG, GREGORY D. SMITH, ) and KEVIN McALLISTER, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS “The [ ] pilots should have been informed.”1 Jon Weaks (President of Southwest Airlines Pilots Association) I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is a putative class action for violations of the federal securities laws. Plaintiff ______ (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Plaintiff’s claims are brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly-traded securities of The Boeing Company (“Boeing” or the “Company”) between January 8, 2019 and May 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and were damaged by the conduct asserted herein (the “Class”). 2. Defendants are: (i) Boeing; (ii) Boeing Chairman, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President Dennis A. Muilenburg; (iii) Boeing Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Executive Vice President of Enterprise Performance and Strategy Gregory D. Smith; and (iv) Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and CEO Kevin McAllister (collectively, “Defendants”). As alleged throughout herein, throughout the Class Period, Defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (“Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5(b) promulgated thereunder. 3. Plaintiff’s allegations are based upon counsel’s investigation except as to the allegations specifically pertaining to Plaintiff, which are based upon his personal knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Northern
    Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 1 of 51 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, ) Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of ) No. STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT ) AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND THE BOEING COMPANY, and ) ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, SYLVIE LAMARCHE LACROIX, Individually and as Estate Trustee of the Estate of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, Deceased, by her attorneys, brings this action for damages on behalf of herself and on behalf of STÉPHANIE LACROIX, her estate, heirs, survivors, next of kin and wrongful beneficiaries against Defendants THE BOEING COMPANY (“BOEING”) and ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE, INC. (“ROSEMOUNT”) as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This action arises from the horrific crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 (“Flight 302”) on March 10, 2019 in which all 157 people on board lost their lives. The aircraft involved in Flight 302 was a BOEING 737 MAX 8. This crash came less than five months after Lion Air Flight JT 610—another BOEING 737 MAX 8—crashed into the Java Sea on October 29, 2018, killing all 189 onboard, due to the same or similar causes. 2. Investigation into both crashes is ongoing, but the similarities in the aircraft and the 1 Case: 1:19-cv-03751 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/05/19 Page 2 of 51 PageID #:2 investigative findings for the crashes thus far point to a common cause. Shortly after taking off and while attempting to climb, pilots for both aircraft reported flight control issues as the planes pitched up and down erratically throughout the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerosafety World November 2009
    AeroSafety WORLD DOUSING THE FLAMES FedEx’s automatic system CRM FAILURE Black hole approach UPSET TRAINING Airplane beats simulators IASS REPORT 777 power rollback, more TRAGEDY AS INSPIRATION JAPAN Airlines’ safeTY CENTER THE JOURNAL OF FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION NOVEMBER 2009 “Cessna is committed to providing the latest safety information to our customers, and that’s why we provide each new Citation owner with an FSF Aviation Department Tool Kit.” — Will Dirks, VP Flight Operations, Cessna Aircraft Co. afety tools developed through years of FSF aviation safety audits have been conveniently packaged for your flight crews and operations personnel. These tools should be on your minimum equipment list. The FSF Aviation Department Tool Kit is such a valuable resource that Cessna Aircraft Co. provides each new Citation owner with a copy. One look at the contents tells you why. Templates for flight operations, safety and emergency response manuals formatted for easy adaptation Sto your needs. Safety-management resources, including an SOPs template, CFIT risk assessment checklist and approach-and-landing risk awareness guidelines. Principles and guidelines for duty and rest schedul- ing based on NASA research. Additional bonus CDs include the Approach and Landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit; Waterproof Flight Operations (a guide to survival in water landings); Operator’sMEL Flight Safety Handbook; item Turbofan Engine Malfunction Recognition and Response; and Turboprop Engine Malfunction Recognition and Response. Here’s your all-in-one collection of flight safety tools — unbeatable value for cost. FSF member price: US$750 Nonmember price: US$1,000 Quantity discounts available! For more information, contact: Namratha Apparao, + 1 703 739-6700, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • FLYHT 2019 July Investor Presentation
    July 2019 FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd. TSX.V: FLY OTCQX: FLYLF 1 TSX.V: FLY OTCQX: FLYLF Disclaimer www.flyht.com Forward Looking Statements This discussion includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” that are subject to risks and uncertainty. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this discussion, including, without limitation, those regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy, projected costs, future plans, projected revenues, objectives of management for future operations, the Company’s ability to meet any repayment obligations, the use of non-GAAP financial measures, trends in the airline industry, the global financial outlook, expanding markets, research and development of next generation products and any government assistance in financing such developments, foreign exchange rate outlooks, new revenue streams and sales projections, cost increases as related to marketing, research and development (including AFIRS 228), administration expenses, and litigation matters, may be or include forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on a number of reasonable assumptions regarding the Canadian, U.S., and global economic environments, local and foreign government policies/regulations and actions and assumptions made based upon discussions to date with the Company’s customers and advisers, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward- looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include production rates, timing for product deliveries and installations, Canadian, U.S., and foreign government activities, volatility of the aviation market for the Company’s products and services, factors that result in significant and prolonged disruption of air travel worldwide, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Qtr 01 15 a Quarterly Publication Brought to You by the Boeing Edge
    QTR_01 15 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE BOEING EDGE Take Our Readership Survey See page 3 Building Better Communication Advanced Ultrasonic Inspection Preventing Loss of Control in Flight Commercial Operations on Runways with Arresting Systems Cover photo: 737-800 Vertical Fin Assembly AERO Contents 03 Building Better Communication: Readership Survey You have an opportunity to provide input that will help shape future issues of AERO. 05 AERO Advanced Ultrasonic Readership Survey Inspection Boeing has introduced advanced Share your opinions, ultrasonic inspection techniques that insights, and ideas at provide operators with significant www.boeing.com/aerosurvey . cost improvements over traditional 05 ultrasonic testing technologies. 09 Preventing Loss of Control in Flight A multiyear industry analysis of loss-of control–in-flight events generated feasible solutions in areas of training, operations, and airplane design. 17 Commercial Operations on Runways with Arresting Systems Airports with joint commercial and military operations are often equipped with runway arresting systems for tactical military air- 09 craft. Airlines working closely with airports can take steps to ensure safe commercial operations in these situations. 17 01 WWW.BOEING.COM/BOEINGEDGE/AEROMAGAZINE Issue 57 _Quarter 01 | 2015 AERO Publisher Design Cover photography Editorial Board Chris Villiers Methodologie Jeff Corwin Don Andersen, Gary Bartz, Richard Breuhaus, David Carbaugh, Laura Chiarenza, Justin Hale, Darrell Hokuf, Al John, Doug Lane, Jill Langer,
    [Show full text]
  • Airbus Develops New A380 Cabin Enablers, Including “New Forward Stairs” Option
    Airbus develops new A380 cabin enablers, including “New Forward Stairs” option By Melissa Silva on April, 10 2017 | Inflight Entertainment Airbus is developing a full spectrum of new cabin enablers for customers of its flagship A380 airliner. The latest is the “New Forward Stairs” (NFS) option, which was presented last week at the Aircraft Interiors Expo (AIX) in Hamburg. Together these cabin enhancements will make the already efficient and comfortable airliner even better: Overall cabin optimization is expected to result in the freeing-up of more cabin floor space for around 80 additional passengers, bringing airlines significant additional revenues. “Continuous improvement of our products is our daily work," said Dr. Kiran Rao, EVP of Strategy and Marketing at Airbus Commercial Aircraft. "This new package for our A380 customers is a smart way to meet airline needs while improving the A380 economics with additional revenues and innovating in passenger comfort.” Dr. Rao added: “Only the A380 has the economies of scale and development potential to efficiently solve the problem of increasing congestion at large airports while providing the best comfort for passengers. The aircraft can also serve fast growing markets and airlines' regional airports, so we are adapting the aircraft to meet evolving market needs.” With this latest proposal of the NFS option, the package of new cabin enablers for the A380 now comprises the following: 1 Copyright DutyFree Magazine. All rights reserved. New Forward Stairs — 20 more passengers (Business, Premium Economy and Economy Classes) The NFS involves relocation of the forward stair from door 1 to door 2, and combining the entrance of the NFS to the upper deck (going up), with the adjacent staircase to the lower-deck crew-rest (going down).
    [Show full text]
  • Boeing Environment Report 2017
    THE BOEING COMPANY 2017 ENVIRONMENT REPORT BUILD SOMETHING CLEANER 1 ABOUT US Boeing begins its second century of business with a firm commitment to lead the aerospace industry into an environmentally progressive and sustainable future. Our centennial in 2016 marked 100 years of Meeting climate change and other challenges innovation in products and services that helped head-on requires a global approach. Boeing transform aviation and the world. The same works closely with government agencies, dedication is bringing ongoing innovation in more customers, stakeholders and research facilities efficient, cleaner products and operations for worldwide to develop solutions that help protect our employees, customers and communities the environment. around the globe. Our commitment to a cleaner, more sustainable Our strategy and actions reflect goals and future drives action at every level of the company. priorities that address the most critical environ- Every day, thousands of Boeing employees lead mental challenges facing our company, activities and projects that advance progress in customers and industry. Innovations that reducing emissions and conserving water and improve efficiency across our product lines resources. and throughout our operations drive reductions This report outlines the progress Boeing made in emissions and mitigate impacts on climate and challenges we encountered in 2016 toward change. our environmental goals and strategy. We’re reducing waste and water use in our In the face of rapidly changing business and facilities, even as we see our business growing. environmental landscapes, Boeing will pursue In addition, we’re finding alternatives to the innovation and leadership that will build a chemicals and hazardous materials in our brighter, more sustainable future for our products and operations, and we’re leading the employees, customers, communities and global development of sustainable aviation fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Crew Fatigue
    There’s a long history of crew fatigue as a factor in fatal accidents. All too often, flight crews don’t recognize the risks posed by long flights, extended duty days and sleep loss. For instance, look at the facts surrounding the fatal October 2004 crash of a medevac Learjet 35A into Otay Mountain, just east of San Diego’s Brown Field Municipal Airport (SDM). After flying three legs, the crew planned an FAR Part 91 deadhead IFR flight from SDM back to their base in Albuquerque. It was to be a short 1+15 jaunt. On the previous afternoon, they’d left at 3:20 p.m. from Albuquerque to fly to El Paso, Texas, to pick up a medical technician. The second leg was a 3-hr. mission from El Paso to Manzanillo, Mexico, to board the medevac patient and another passenger. After hours on the ground at Manzanillo, the crew departed at 8:40 p.m. for the 3+24 flight to San Diego, where an ambulance would transport the patient to a local hospital. They landed at Brown shortly after 11:00 p.m. due to the time zone change. The CVR told much about the crew’s fatigue. The dialogue between the captain and first officer reeks of impaired judgment and faulty decision-making. The two pilots might as well have been talking after being over-served in the airport bar. The captain said he intended to depart eastbound on Brown Field’s Runway 8L to avoid noise-sensitive populated areas to the west. The departure plan also would head them for home base at Albuquerque just after midnight.
    [Show full text]
  • 737 Max: Boeing's Crashes Expose Systemic Failings
    Pushing It to the Max Boeing's Crashes Expose Systemic Failings The crash of two Boeing 737 Max jets in the course of just months has created an existential crisis for the company. Were the 346 who died in Indonesia and Ethiopia the victims of shortcuts and cutthroat competition in the aviation industry? By DER SPIEGEL Staff 26.08.2019, 15∶43 Uhr Grounded 737 Max jets at Boeing Field in Seattle Lindsey Wasson/ REUTERS It took Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 about six minutes to travel from Addis Ababa to Ejere, a sprawling cluster of small farms on the edge of the Abyssinian highlands. By car, the journey takes around three hours and winds past unfinished buildings in the Ethiopian capital's southeastern suburbs before continuing down the immaculate, six-lane Addis Adama Expressway, which was built by the Chinese and opened in 2014. After the exit, there's a narrow, bumpy gravel road that's barely wide enough for a single car or carriage. It is out here that the scene of the accident can be found -- or the scene of the crime, depending on what investigators find. In this undulating terrain 2,000 meters (6562 feet) above sea level, the earth seems scorched. The only green comes from eucalyptus trees, which dot the landscape and provide precious shade for goatherds and their animals. Along the paths are head-high stalls that transform into storefronts come market day, when farmers sell their homemade schnapps. It's a barren region. 1 The crater the airplane made when it slammed into the ground at 8:44 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/25/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-06025, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 25 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0223; Special Conditions No. 25-768-SC] Special Conditions: GDC Technics, Boeing Model 777-300ER Series Airplane; Lower Lobe Crew Rest Compartment AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments. SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777-300ER series airplane. This airplane, as modified by GDC Technics, will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. This design feature is a lower lobe crew rest (LLCR) compartment located under the passenger cabin floor of the Boeing Model 777-300ER series airplane. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards. DATES: This action is effective on GDC Technics on [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Send comments on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2020-0223 using any of the following methods: Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    [Show full text]