DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2008 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Report 2008 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 93 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Foreword from the Cheif Executive Officer Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA The Year in Brief Annual repport 2008 Bjørn Kjos Annual Report 2008 The Year in Brief S E V E R N A Y A Z E M L Q1 Q2 Y A New routes 9 New routes 32 S E V E R N A Y Passengers 1 997 035 (+ 53%) Passengers A Z2 344 219 (+ 47%) E M Boeing 737-800 deliveries 2 S EBoeingV E R 737-800N A Y deliveries 3 L A Z Y A Avg. spot fuel price USD 890 (+ 51 %) Boeing 737-300 deliveriesE M 2 y a L Y NOVOSIBIRSKIVE l Fuel hedge none Avg. spot fuel price A USD 1 176 (+ 83 %) e m OSTROVO Z Fuel hedge none a y a v a NOVOSIBIRSKIVE o • Opening of Rygge airportl y • Rebranded FlyNordic to Norwegian.se m N • Early eastery holidayae in March • Secured pre-delivery financing with Natixis for NOVOSIBIRSKIVE OSTROVO m l Z e a 10 first acquired Boeing 737-800 HGW OSTROVO Z y a a y v a o S E V E R N A v Y A N Z E o M L ALTA KIRKENES Y TROMSØ N Q3 A Q4 BARDUFOSS Table of contents HARSTAD/NARVIK New routes 3 New routes 18 KIRUNA Passengers 2 574 382 (+ 27%) Passengers 2 220 917 (+ 11%) BODØ ALTA KIRKENES y a NOVOSIBIRSKIVE TROMSØ ALTA m l Boeing 737-800 deliveries 1 Boeing 737-800 deliveries 1 TROMSØ KIRKENES e OSTROVO Z The year in Brief 03 BARDUFOSS a Boeing 737-300 deliveries 1 MD-80 re-delivery 3 HARSTAD/NARVIKLULEÅ BARDUFOSS y HARSTAD/NARVIK a Avg. spot fuel price USD 1 271 (+ 82 %) Avg. spot fuel price USD 823 (+ 0 %) Dear Shareholders 04 KIRUNA v KIRUNA o BODØ N Fuel hedge none Fuel hedge 15.500 tons at USD 1,142 This is Norwegian 08 UMEÅBODØ TRONDHEIM Operations and market development 12 LULEÅ • MNOK 400 rights issue oversubscribed • Launch of Copenhagen base ÅLESUND LULEÅ ALTA • Launch of Call Norwegian Operating costs 14 TROMSØ KIRKENES BARDUFOSS UMEÅUMEÅ Share and ownership structure 16 BERGEN HARSTAD/NARVIKTRONDHEIMTRONDHEIM ST PETERSBURG OSLO STOCKHOLM KIRUNA TALLINN Corporate governance 19 ÅLESUND BODØ OSLO/RYGGE ÅLESUND 2008 2007 2006 2005 STAVANGER The Board of Director´s Annual report 23 LULEÅ Operating Revenue (TNOK) 6 226 413 4 226 202 2 941 400 1 972 246 KRISTIANSAND BERGENBERGEN Consolidated accounts 28 AALBORG ST PETERSBURG STOCKHOLMUMEÅ TALLINN ST PETERSBURG EBITDAR (TNOK) 199 797 504 395 200 897 184 501 TRONDHEIM OSLOOSLORIGA STOCKHOLM TALLINN EDINBURGH OSLO/RYGGEPALANGA Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA accounts 66 STAVANGER OSLO/RYGGE EBITDA (TNOK) -208 243 207 995 20 559 58 594 COPENHAGENÅLESUNDSTAVANGER Auditor´s report 89 KRISTIANSAND VILNIUS KRISTIANSANDGDANSKAALBORG EBT (TNOK) 5 339 112 982 -31 706 38 935 BERGEN AALBORG RIGA ST PETERSBURG EDINBURGHHAMBURG OSLO SZCZECINSTOCKHOLM TALLINN RIGA EDINBURGH PALANGA Basic Earnings per Share (NOK) 0.15 3.77 (1.14) 1.53 AMSTERDAM BERLINOSLO/RYGGE COPENHAGEN WARSAW PALANGA STAVANGER COPENHAGEN D S LONDON/GATWICK KRISTIANSAND VILNIUS Diluted Earnings per Share (NOK) 0.15 3.77 (1.14) 1.53 A N DÜSSELDORF AALBORG WROCLAW GDANSK VILNIUS S L RIGA GDANSK N I EDINBURGH HAMBURG SZCZECIN I A KRAKOWPALANGA E U T PRAGUE A L AMSTERDAMCOPENHAGEN HAMBURGBERLIN SZCZECINWARSAW S PARIS AMSTERDAM VILNIUS WARSAW Equity Ratio 28 % 22 % 25 % 21 % N D LONDON/GATWICKMUNICH GDANSK BERLIN WROCLAW L A S DÜSSELDORF I S D LONDON/GATWICK HAMBURG SZCZECIN WROCLAW Cash and Cash Equivalents (TNOK) 607 536 501 410 231 710 261 464 I A N A N AMSTERDAM DÜSSELDORFSALZBURGBERLIN BUDAPESTWARSAW KRAKOW L E U T S L PRAGUE D S A N I LONDON/GATWICK A N T I A DÜSSELDORFPARIS WROCLAW KRAKOW S L A L E U PRAGUE Unit Cost (cost pr ASK) 0.56 0.53 0.54 0.55 A N I GENÈVA RIJEKA MUNICH KRAKOW E U T I PARIS PRAGUE A L PULA PARIS VENICE MUNICH SALZBURG BUDAPEST BORDEAUX MUNICH BELGRADE SALZBURG NICE PISA GENÈVA SALZBURG SARAJEVOBUDAPEST BUDAPEST ASK 11 530 7 561 5 371 3 464 SPLIT RIJEKA BURGAS VENICE PRISTINAPULA GENÈVA GENÈVARIJEKA VARNA RPK 9 074 6 059 4 223 2 703 BORDEAUX VENICEDUBROVNIKPULA RIJEKA BELGRADE VENICE BELGRADEPULA BARCELONABORDEAUX ROME NICE PISA SARAJEVO NICE PISA SARAJEVOSPLIT ISTANBULBELGRADE BURGAS Load Factor 79 % 80 % 79 % 78 % BORDEAUX SPLIT BURGAS PRISTINA PALMA NICE PISA DUBROVNIKPRISTINA SARAJEVO VARNA VALENCIA DUBROVNIK SPLIT VARNA BURGAS Passengers 9 136 553 6 934 376 5 104 814 3 289 769 IBIZA BARCELONABARCELONAROME ROMECORFU PRISTINA DUBROVNIK ISTANBUL ISTANBULVARNA 1) ALICANTE PALMA ATHENS Internet Sales 87 % 86 % 84 % 75 % FARO (ALGARVE) MURCIA VALENCIAVALENCIA PALMA IBIZA BARCELONA ROMECORFU ISTANBUL MALAGA IBIZA KOSCORFUANTALYA 2) ALICANTE SANTORINIATHENS Number of Routes 170 114 86 50 FARO (ALGARVE) VALENCIAMURCIA ALICANTE PALMA ATHENSRHODES FARO (ALGARVE) MALAGA MURCIA SANTORINI KOS ANTALYA Number of Destinations 2) 87 70 57 36 IBIZA CHANIA HERAKLIONRHODES CORFU MALAGA SANTORINI CYPRUSKOS ANTALYA ALICANTE CHANIA HERAKLION ATHENS RHODES 3) FARO (ALGARVE) MURCIA CYPRUS Number of Aircraft 40 33 19 14 MALAGA CHANIA HERAKLION ANTALYA MARRAKECH SANTORINI KOS CYPRUS MARRAKECH RHODES CHANIA HERAKLION 1) Norwegian.no only 3) Operated during the year 2) At year-end LANZAROTE MARRAKECH CYPRUS LANZAROTE TENERIFE GRAN CANARIA SHARM EL TENERIFE LANZAROTE MARRAKECH SHEIKH 2 GRAN CANARIA SHARM EL 3 SHEIKH TENERIFE DUBAI GRAN CANARIA SHARM EL LANZAROTE SHEIKH DUBAI TENERIFE GRAN CANARIA SHARM EL DUBAI SHEIKH DUBAI M E E L A A E S N S D I T I N E S I A MM E E E E L L AA A A I E E S S NN S S T ND D I E T I IN ME ESS E LII AA A A E S N S D I T I N E S I A North I. South I. South Georgia North I. North I. South I. North I. South I. South I. South Georgia South Georgia South Georgia Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA Foreword from the Cheif Executive Officer Annual Report 2008 Bjørn Kjos Dear Shareholders 2008 was an exciting year for Norwegian. Oil sectors to typical leisure destinations in Europe The CEO of IATA rung the alarm bell already in prices hit record levels and the financial markets were replaced by shorter intra-Scandinavian September, stating that “Even the good news that tumbled, making the year particularly demanding sectors with stronger demand which can better the oil price has fallen to half its July peak is not for the aviation industry. Airlines both close to sustain high fuel prices. The strategic actions enough to offset the impact of the drop in home and across the Atlantic were forced to cut were successful. Combined with a fuel surcharge demand”. In line with the IATA forecast, the capacity and ground aircraft. Some unfortunately they nearly offset the fuel price increase. number of passengers traveling through Oslo went out of business. Airport, our largest base, plunged 5 % from Norwegian had no forward contracts to cover for September until year-end 2008. Norwegian’s business model with a competitive fuel exposure when the fuel price increased during product and pricing appears to be relatively the first half of the year. The company was thus Norwegian on the other hand increased the resistant to the economic slowdown as it seems affected harder than many competitors. Following number of passengers by 15 % over the same to attract more new customers from typical significant fuel-cost related losses in Q1 and Q2, period from the same airport which to a large business segments than it loses from the more we entered into a hedging strategy modeled on the extent proves our business model’s ability to price sensitive segments. In 2008 Norwegian so-called “trailing stop” technique; we set a “roof” better withstand recession. increased capacity by 52 %, opened new bases at a predetermined interval above the current at Moss Airport Rygge and Copenhagen Airport market price, only entering into forward contracts Ancillary Revenue & Call Norwegian Kastrup in Denmark, and increased revenues by for pre-set fuel volumes if the price fluctuated Ancillary revenue is an increasingly important 47 % to MNOK 6,226. through the “roof”. The strategy reduces the item on our income statement; during the year negative fuel exposure from increasing prices ancillary revenue per passenger has increased by In 2008 Norwegian increased capacity by 52 %, while it secures potential gains from decreasing 66% compared to 2007. opened new bases at Moss Airport Rygge and prices. As a result Norwegian was better positioned Copenhagen Airport Kastrup in Denmark, and when the fuel price slumped in the fourth quarter during the year ancillary increased revenues by 47 % to MNOK 6,226. compared to many “over hedged” competitors. Despite an extra fuel bill of MNOK 633 compared revenue per passenger has in- to 2007 spot levels, we managed to deliver a net Norwegian did however have forward contracts in ”creased by 66 % compared to 2007. profit of MNOK 4 in 2008. place during Q4. These volumes were secured in September and October when the oil price was Contrary to many LCC competitors, Norwegian particularly volatile. Following the sharply declining In 2008 we also took delivery adheres to the slogan “freedom to choose”. We fuel price in Q4 we incurred an extra hedge related believe it should be possible to travel for the loss of MNOK 162. of seven new environmentally announced ticket price without any further fees or ”friendly Boeing 737-800 aircraft charges being added, and without the ticket price 2008 was in line with previous years characterized subsidizing the added cost of choices made by which significantly enhance our by substantial expansion which is both costly and fellow passengers.
Recommended publications
  • Contents [Edit] Africa

    Contents [Edit] Africa

    Low cost carriers The following is a list of low cost carriers organized by home country. A low-cost carrier or low-cost airline (also known as a no-frills, discount or budget carrier or airline) is an airline that offers generally low fares in exchange for eliminating many traditional passenger services. See the low cost carrier article for more information. Regional airlines, which may compete with low-cost airlines on some routes are listed at the article 'List of regional airlines.' Contents [hide] y 1 Africa y 2 Americas y 3 Asia y 4 Europe y 5 Middle East y 6 Oceania y 7 Defunct low-cost carriers y 8 See also y 9 References [edit] Africa Egypt South Africa y Air Arabia Egypt y Kulula.com y 1Time Kenya y Mango y Velvet Sky y Fly540 Tunisia Nigeria y Karthago Airlines y Aero Contractors Morocco y Jet4you y Air Arabia Maroc [edit] Americas Mexico y Aviacsa y Interjet y VivaAerobus y Volaris Barbados Peru y REDjet (planned) y Peruvian Airlines Brazil United States y Azul Brazilian Airlines y AirTran Airways Domestic y Gol Airlines Routes, Caribbean Routes and y WebJet Linhas Aéreas Mexico Routes (in process of being acquired by Southwest) Canada y Allegiant Air Domestic Routes and International Charter y CanJet (chartered flights y Frontier Airlines Domestic, only) Mexico, and Central America y WestJet Domestic, United Routes [1] States and Caribbean y JetBlue Airways Domestic, Routes Caribbean, and South America Routes Colombia y Southwest Airlines Domestic Routes y Aires y Spirit Airlines Domestic, y EasyFly Caribbean, Central and
  • Norges Høyesterett

    Norges Høyesterett

    NORGES HØYESTERETT Den 5. mai 2011 avsa Høyesterett dom i HR-2011-00910-A, (sak nr. 2010/1676), sivil sak, anke over dom, Sven Vidar Bottolvs Tore Inge Erlandsen Harald Glebo Jon Hovring Einar Åsmund Nordhagen Viggo Sivertsen Per Harald Hanssen Glenn Olaf Lyche (advokat Alex Borch – til prøve) Per Steinar Horne Hans Oddvar Tofterå (advokat Jon Gisle – til prøve) mot SAS Scandinavian Airlines Norge AS Næringslivets Hovedorganisasjon (partshjelper) (advokat Tron Dalheim – til prøve) STEMMEGIVNING: (1) Dommer Normann: Saken gjelder gyldigheten av oppsigelsene av ti flygere i SAS Norge AS (SAS Norge). Hovedspørsmålet er om det skjedde ulovlig aldersdiskriminering ved utvelgelsen av dem som ble oppsagt. 2 (2) Morselskapet i SAS-konsernet, SAS AB, eier datterselskapene SAS Danmark A/S, SAS Norge AS og SAS Sverige AB. Flyvirksomheten ble opprinnelig drevet gjennom et konsortium eid av datterselskapene kalt Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark Norway Sweden (SAS-konsortiet). I 1989 ble SAS Commuter etablert som et søsterkonsortium til SAS-konsortiet. I 2001 overtok SAS AB aksjene i Braathens ASA. I 2002 ble Widerøe en del av SAS-konsernet, og i 2004 ble SAS Commuter innlemmet i SAS-konsortiet. (3) Med virkning fra 1. januar 2005 ble den norske virksomheten i SAS-konsortiet skilt ut og slått sammen med Braathens ASA til SAS Braathens AS. Selskapet endret senere navn til SAS Scandinavian Airlines Norge AS, og var de ankende parters arbeidsgiver på oppsigelsestidspunktet. (4) I forbindelse med implementeringen av de felles europeiske flysertifikatbestemmelsene ble den øvre grensen for ervervsmessig flysertifikat hevet fra 60 til 65 år, jf. forskrift 20. desember 2000 som trådte i kraft 1.
  • Low Cost Monitor 2/2008

    Low Cost Monitor 2/2008

    Low Cost Monitor 2/2008 - A Joint Analysis of DLR and ADV - 617 Routes The current Low Cost Carrier Market in Germany Autumn 2008 The current Low Cost Carrier Market in Germany (2008) Since several years the low cost carrier (LCC) market is an essential part of the German air transport market. The Low Cost Monitor, jointly issued by ADV and DLR, twice a year informs on LCC’s essential features and current developments in this market segment, particularly as to the number and relative importance of low cost carriers, their offers including the air fare, and the passenger demand. The offers reflected by the current Monitor are based on one reference week of the summer flight schedule 2008. The passenger traffic indicated relates to the half year total of 2008. Airlines 4 The airlines involved in the Low Cost business, design their flight services quite differently. Due to this inhomogeneity, only a few clear distinctive criteria can be defined, for example low fares and direct sale via the Internet. Thus, in some cases a certain scope of discretion arises when allocating an airline to the LCC-segment. Furthermore, for several airlines amalgamations of business models are seen, which additionally complicate the accurate allocation of airlines to the Low Cost Market. The authors of this Monitor currently classify 23 airlines operating on German airports as low cost carriers. These are in detail (see also Table 1): Aer Lingus (EI) (www.aerlingus.com), Fleet: 33 Aircraft (A320: 27/A321: 6) Air Baltic (BT) (www.airbaltic.com), Fleet: 25 Aircraft
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (A Public Limited Liability Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Norway)

    REGISTRATION DOCUMENT Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Norway) For the definitions of capitalised terms used throughout this Registration Document, see Section 13 “Definitions and Glossary”. Investing in the Shares involves risks; see Section 1 “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5. Investing in the Shares, including the Offer Shares, and other securities issued by the Issuer involves a particularly high degree of risk. Prospective investors should read the entire Prospectus, comprising of this Registration Document, the Securities Note dated 6 May 2021 and the Summary dated 6 May 2021, and, in particular, consider the risk factors set out in this Registration Document and the Securities Note when considering an investment in the Company. The Company has been severely impacted by the current outbreak of COVID-19. In a very short time period, the Company has lost most of its revenues and is in adverse financial distress. This has adversely and materially affected the Group’s contracts, rights and obligations, including financing arrangements, and the Group is not capable of complying with its ongoing obligations and is currently subject to event of default. On 18 November 2020, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries applied for Examinership in Ireland (and were accepted into Examinership on 7 December 2020), and on 8 December 2020 the Company applied for and was accepted into Reconstruction in Norway. These processes were sanctioned by the Irish and Norwegian courts on 26 March 2021 and 12 April 2021 respectively, however remain subject to potential appeals in Norway (until 12 May 2021) and certain other conditions precedent, including but not limited to the successful completion of a capital raise in the amount of at least NOK 4,500 million (including the Rights Issue, the Private Placement and issuance of certain convertible hybrid instruments as described further herein).
  • Q:/S/C/W270A2-03.Pdf

    Q:/S/C/W270A2-03.Pdf

    S/C/W/270/Add.2 Page 403 PART H OWNERSHIP S/C/W/270/Add.2 Page 405 H. OWNERSHIP 1. Regulatory aspects 659. This section will discuss: (a) the different concepts associated with the term "ownership", and their interactions; (b) documentary limitations affecting the analysis of the issue; and (c) main regulatory developments. (a) The different concepts associated with the term "ownership" and their interaction 660. As explained in the compilation (paragraphs 7-9, pages 220-221), in the professional and academic aviation literature the term "ownership" is indifferently used to refer to three distinct concepts: (i) The designation policy through which a country attributes the rights to operate, either domestically or under a bilateral Air Services Agreement, to a given airline(s) (e.g. the US Department of Transportation granting traffic rights to American Airlines but not to Continental Airlines on a non-open- skies destination). Designation policies were used in the past both at the national level (e.g. before the 1979 deregulation, the US Civil Aeronautics Board would attribute the right to operate on a given city-pair to a given airline) and at the international level. They seem now to be confined mainly to the international arena with the marginal exception of public services contracts. (ii) The national investment/establishment regime for airlines, whether operating only domestic flights, only international flights, or both. The investment regime may cover also non-scheduled carriers and, in certain instances, general aviation/business aviation carriers. In cases where there is only one, publicly-owned airline, there may be no investment regime since none is needed.
  • Die Folgende Liste Zeigt Alle Fluggesellschaften, Die Über Den Flugvergleich Von Verivox Buchbar Sein Können

    Die Folgende Liste Zeigt Alle Fluggesellschaften, Die Über Den Flugvergleich Von Verivox Buchbar Sein Können

    Die folgende Liste zeigt alle Fluggesellschaften, die über den Flugvergleich von Verivox buchbar sein können. Aufgrund von laufenden Updates einzelner Tarife, technischen Problemen oder eingeschränkten Verfügbarkeiten kann es vorkommen, dass einzelne Airlines oder Tarife nicht berechnet oder angezeigt werden können. 1 Adria Airways 2 Aegean Airlines 3 Aer Arann 4 Aer Lingus 5 Aeroflot 6 Aerolan 7 Aerolíneas Argentinas 8 Aeroméxico 9 Air Algérie 10 Air Astana 11 Air Austral 12 Air Baltic 13 Air Berlin 14 Air Botswana 15 Air Canada 16 Air Caraibes 17 Air China 18 Air Corsica 19 Air Dolomiti 20 Air Europa 21 Air France 22 Air Guinee Express 23 Air India 24 Air Jamaica 25 Air Madagascar 26 Air Malta 27 Air Mauritius 28 Air Moldova 29 Air Namibia 30 Air New Zealand 31 Air One 32 Air Serbia 33 Air Transat 34 Air Asia 35 Alaska Airlines 36 Alitalia 37 All Nippon Airways 38 American Airlines 39 Arkefly 40 Arkia Israel Airlines 41 Asiana Airlines 42 Atlasglobal 43 Austrian Airlines 44 Avianca 45 B&H Airlines 46 Bahamasair 47 Bangkok Airways 48 Belair Airlines 49 Belavia Belarusian Airlines 50 Binter Canarias 51 Blue1 52 British Airways 53 British Midland International 54 Brussels Airlines 55 Bulgaria Air 56 Caribbean Airlines 57 Carpatair 58 Cathay Pacific 59 China Airlines 60 China Eastern 61 China Southern Airlines 62 Cimber Sterling 63 Condor 64 Continental Airlines 65 Corsair International 66 Croatia Airlines 67 Cubana de Aviacion 68 Cyprus Airways 69 Czech Airlines 70 Darwin Airline 71 Delta Airlines 72 Dragonair 73 EasyJet 74 EgyptAir 75
  • Sweden Travel Guide

    Sweden Travel Guide

    Sweden Travel Guide Orebro Castle in the autumn sunny day, Sweden Sweden is located in Northern Europe. Stockholm is the capital city of the country. Sweden shares its borders with Finland, Norway, and the Baltic Sea. Swedish is the official language of Sweden. The country is divided into twenty- one counties. Along with Swedish, English is also widely spoken in Sweden. Sweden is a member of the European Union since 1995. Sweden can be visited during both the summer and winter months. Remember to pack some good winter clothes, if you are going to Sweden during winter. The standard of living in the country is high and Sweden is an expensive country to visit. Sweden is a major exporter of articles like timber, copper, iron, etc. Some of the important international airports of Sweden are: Stockholm Arlanda, Göteborg Landvetter, and Copenhagen Kastrup. If you are in any of the neighboring countries like Denmark, Norway, Germany, or France, then you can reach Sweden by train. You can also reach Sweden by boat. Though Sweden is a big country, traveling by plane is an expensive affair, and it is better to travel by train or bus. Some of the tourist attractions in Sweden: Lapland wilderness Gripsholm Castle Skokloster Slott Castle Sareks National Park The Swedish Museum of Natural History The Kingdom of Crystal The Nordic Museum Getting In The different modes of transportation for reaching Sweden include plane, train, bus and boat. Plane Airways is perhaps the most comfortable way of reaching the country. The major international airport of Sweden is the Stockholm-Arlanda International Airport.
  • SAS “New” Business Model

    SAS “New” Business Model

    SAS “new” business model David Sörhammar Uppsala University Department of Business Studies Sweden [email protected] Anna Bengtson Uppsala University Keywords: dynamics, market change, marketing practice, SAS. Abstract In September 2005 SAS introduced a new business model. Where did the model come from and what influenced it? This paper’s focus is on the making of the model where we study the making of a business model as a dynamic process through time. In concrete terms, traces of today’s model can be found and examined from the SAS group’s embryonic attempts starting in 1946, through the financially good years during the 1980s, to the market re-regulation in contemporary time. During these years several changes have taken part both on the larger air travel market and in SAS´s market practice. We have separated SAS´s history into three era’s, the technological era, the businessman’s airlines era, and the “to serve Europe with air travel” era. Elaborating on the theoretical notion of mutuality between markets and market practice (Cf. Helgesson et. al., 2004), the impact of these practices and of the market infra structure at different points in time are described and their importance for the emergence of the business model discussed. Our findings show that the political efforts to de-regulate the European air travel markets did not automatically change all market practices and thus not the market. The process that followed the de-regulation can better be characterised as a translation process in which a changed market was created, based on an already established network of embedded material and immaterial items, such as booking systems, airplanes and perceptive frames, that had to be taken into consideration.
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.Pdf

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.Pdf

    FACULTY F SOCIAL SCIENCES, UIS BUSINESS SCHOOL MASTER’S THESIS STUDY PROGRAM: THESIS IS WRITTEN IN THE FOLLOWING SPECIALIZATION/SUBJECT: Business and administration Applied Finance THE ASSIGNMENT IS NOT CONFIDENTIAL TITLE:Valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA AUTHOR(S) SUPERVISOR: Student number: Name: 230498 Christer B. Nordbø Marius Sikveland ………………… ……………………………………. 229868 Jabbar Raza ………………… ……………………………………. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF 2 BOUND COPIES OF THESIS Stavanger, ……/…… 2016 Signature administration:………………………… Executive Summary The purpose of this thesis is to do a valuation on Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, and based upon this objective we have formulated the following problem statement: “What is the fair value of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA as per 31.03.2016?” The purpose of this valuation is to evaluate if the stock price is either over or under priced. Based on the findings in this thesis, we estimated the stock price of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA to be NOK 283,1. On 31.03.2016 the stock price of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA was NOK 311,5 and therefore our claim is that the stock is overvalued. Our recommendation is then to sell the stock. To answer the problem statement, we will do a fundamental valuation of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. First we did a strategic analysis, consisting one external analysis and one internal analysis. The external analysis consisted of a Pestle analysis and Porter Five Forces framework. This gave us the foundation for predicting future development and environment of the company. From the external analysis we found that the European market is driven by low margins and fierce competition. For the internal analysis we did a VRIO-analysis evaluating the internal resources.
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners

    Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners

    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
  • Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa Quarterly Report – Fourth Quarter 2007

    Norwegian Air Shuttle Asa Quarterly Report – Fourth Quarter 2007

    NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT – FOURTH QUARTER 2007 FOURTH QUARTER IN BRIEF The Group earnings before tax (EBT) was MNOK -34.0 (-35.6) in the fourth quarter. The fourth quarter operating revenue increased by 50.7 %, compared to last year, to MNOK 1,145.4 (759.9). The total quarterly earnings before depreciation (EBITDA) were MNOK -36.3 (-19.0), and the quarterly earnings after tax were MNOK -21.5 (-24.8). Norwegian transported a total of 1,670,075 passengers in the fourth quarter, passenger traffic (RPK) increased by 38 % compared to the same period last year. FlyNordic transported 332,565 passengers in the fourth quarter. The passenger load factor was 78 % (72 %) in the fourth quarter for Norwegian, whereas FlyNordic had a load factor of 74 %. The total production (ASK) increased by 27 % to 1,811 million this quarter for Norwegian. Total production (ASK) for Fly Nordic was 311 million in fourth quarter. The total quarterly unit cost for Norwegian was NOK 0.55 (0.55). Norwegian started Bank Norwegian in October 2007, and Norwegian’s total ownership in the bank is 20 %. A total of MNOK 9.0 of EBT is due to the sale of ownership and share of net results in the bank during the quarter. TRAFFIC STATISTICS 4.quarter Accumulated Norwegian 2007 2006 Change 2007 2006 Change Internet bookings 85 % 84 % 1 pp 86 % 84 % 2 pp ASK (mill) 1 811 1 421 27 % 6 959 5 371 30 % RPK (mill) 1 415 1 024 38 % 5 586 4 223 32 % Cabin factor 78 % 72 % 6 pp 80 % 79 % 2 pp Passengers 1 670 075 1 298 545 29 % 6 362 725 5 104 814 25 % Segment Domestic
  • EU Air Transport Liberalisation: Process, Impacts and Future Considerations

    EU Air Transport Liberalisation: Process, Impacts and Future Considerations

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Burghouwt, Guillaume; Mendes de Leon, Pablo; De Wit, Jaap Working Paper EU Air transport liberalisation: Process, impacts and future considerations International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2015-04 Provided in Cooperation with: International Transport Forum (ITF), OECD Suggested Citation: Burghouwt, Guillaume; Mendes de Leon, Pablo; De Wit, Jaap (2015) : EU Air transport liberalisation: Process, impacts and future considerations, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2015-04, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/109162 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt