DOCSLIB.ORG

1 U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE 1 2 KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE OIL PROJECT 3 4 5 PUBLIC COMMENTS 6 September 29, 2011 7 8 Best Western

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE 1 2 KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE OIL PROJECT 3 4 5 PUBLIC COMMENTS 6 September 29, 2011 7 8 Best Western 1 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 2 3 KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE OIL PROJECT 4 5 6 PUBLIC COMMENTS 7 September 29, 2011 8 9 Best Western Ramkota 10 11 920 West Sioux Avenue 12 Pierre, South Dakota 13 57502 14 12:00 p.m. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Reported by: 22 CHARLES D. HOFFMAN 23 2 1 APPEARANCES 2 3 JAMES STEELE, U.S. Department of State, presiding officer. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 (12:00 P.M.) 3 MR. STEELE: Ladies and gentlemen, I'd 4 like to go ahead and get the meeting started. We 5 have a goodly number that would like to make 6 comments. So let's go ahead and get started, so 7 that we can make the best use of our time. 8 Hello, good afternoon, my name is Jim Steele. 9 I am from the U.S. Department of State, the United 10 States Department of State. On behalf of the 11 Department of State, we would like to thank you for 12 joining us here in Pierre, South Dakota at this 13 public meeting on the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline. 14 We recognize that this is an important issue, and we 15 value your input. 16 The purpose of this meeting is for members of 17 the public to express their views on whether issuing 18 a presidential permit for the proposed Keystone XL 19 Pipeline is in the national interest. To focus time 20 and attention on your comments, we will not be 21 answering questions at this or at any of the other 22 public meetings that are taking place this week in 23 4 1 Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Montana and in 2 Washington D.C. next month. 3 We appreciate the interest of every single 4 individual in this room to take the time to share 5 your perspectives on this issue. We take your 6 comments seriously and will consider them carefully. 7 We understand that there are strong views and 8 feelings about this issue. This is an opportunity 9 for you to express those views. But we ask that you 10 respect the rules that we have established, so that 11 we can hear from as many people as possible today. 12 We ask that you be fair and respectful to everyone 13 who has taken the time to come here. 14 Before we begin, I would like to describe the 15 Department of State's role in the presidential 16 permitting process and to lay out the ground rules 17 for participating in today's meeting. 18 In September of 2008, TransCanada Keystone 19 Pipeline LP filed an application for a presidential 20 permit for the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline. 21 Executive Order 13337 signed on April 30th, 2004, 22 delegates to the Department of State the authority 23 5 1 to issue a presidential permit for facilities, such 2 as Keystone XL Pipeline, that cross the United 3 States' border. 4 In considering a permit, the Department of 5 State determines whether allowing the border 6 crossing is in the United States' national interest, 7 taking into account environmental and safety issues 8 as well as energy security, foreign policy and 9 social and economic concerns. 10 In addition to the executive order, the 11 department determined, because of the importance of 12 this proposed pipeline, that it should evaluate the 13 pipeline's possible environmental and safety 14 impacts, consistent with the National Environmental 15 Policy Act, or NEPA. As a consequence, the State 16 Department prepared an environmental impact 17 statement, consistent with NEPA, to evaluate the 18 proposed pipeline's potential environmental and 19 safety impacts. 20 In preparing that environmental impact 21 statement over the last 2 1/2 years, we have 22 conducted 41 public meetings along the pipeline 23 6 1 route and in Washington D.C. in order to gather 2 public comments in developing the scope and the 3 draft of the environmental impact statement. 4 On August 26th, we released the final 5 environmental impact statement, which addresses the 6 more than 250,000 comments from the public that we 7 received during the public comment period. The 8 final environmental impact statement is just one 9 factor considered in the review process. The final 10 environmental impact statement does not represent a 11 final decision on the permit application. 12 Now, as we move toward the national interest 13 determination, the Department of State is compiling 14 additional information to determine if the proposed 15 Keystone XL Pipeline is in the national interest and 16 to decide whether to grant or deny the permit. 17 The ground rules for the meeting today. In 18 order to maximize public participation and to be 19 fair to the participants, we ask that you abide by 20 these rules of order. We hope to have the 21 opportunity to listen to everyone that wishes to 22 speak. But in order to allow the maximum amount of 23 7 1 participation, we ask you to limit your comments to 2 three minutes. Given the interest in this issue, it 3 may not be possible for everyone in attendance here 4 today to speak. If you do not have the opportunity 5 to speak, you can still provide your written 6 comments on the back of the information sheet that 7 was handed to you when you came into the building 8 today. You can write your comments on that sheet 9 and leave them either at the table in the back or 10 the table up in front, preferably at the table in 11 the back. You can also mail your comments in. You 12 can fax them in. You can e-mail them or you can 13 submit your comments online. We will consider all 14 comments that are received, but we ask that you 15 submit those comments by October 9th. 16 Speakers will make their comments today on a 17 fist come, first served basis, by assigned number, 18 having signed in personally at the door outside. 19 After one speaker ends, the next number and name 20 will be called, and to speed things up, I'll 21 probably wind up calling four speakers at a time, so 22 that you have time to prepare yourself to come on 23 8 1 up. 2 Since we can not anticipate exactly how long a 3 person will speak, we can't really tell you exactly 4 when you will be up to speak. When your number is 5 called, we ask that you come to the microphone, 6 state your name, affiliation, and offer your 7 comments. And please note that there are two sets 8 of microphones. 9 As you speak in time in that three minute 10 interval, a card will be displayed when you have one 11 minute remaining and when your time is up. That 12 card says thank you; we appreciate your comments, 13 but it's time to finish up so somebody else can have 14 a chance. 15 If you run out of time, again, you can submit 16 your comments in written form. And I assure you 17 that they will be considered. They will have the 18 same weight as if you had delivered them orally. 19 Again, the handout specifies the procedures you 20 can take to e-mail, fax or mail your comments in. 21 All oral comments and written comments will be 22 considered as part of our decision. They will be 23 9 1 reviewed by the Department of State and during the 2 decision making process. Your oral comments here 3 today will be recorded and then transcribed by a 4 court reporter. Other written comments will be 5 accepted, again, until October 9th. 6 Department of State officials are here to 7 listen to your comments, so that they can be 8 considered. We will not be in a question and answer 9 session today. Again, we understand that there are 10 strong views on this issue, and we ask that in 11 fairness to everyone concerned, those who choose to 12 speak be allowed to do so without interruption. We 13 request that no signs, no displays be posted in the 14 building. 15 As we mentioned earlier, please do keep your 16 remarks to no more than three minutes, and please be 17 respectful of others. I ask also that you turn off 18 cell phones or set them to the silent setting. We 19 plan on ending this meeting at 8:00 o'clock this 20 evening. We will break for 30 minutes at about 3:30 21 and resume at about 4:00 o'clock. 22 I would like to stress, once again, that the 23 10 1 Department of State has not yet made a decision on 2 this matter. That is the purpose of this meeting, 3 to give members of the public the opportunity to 4 make comments that will be considered when we are 5 deciding whether to issue or to grant or whether to 6 deny that application for the presidential permit. 7 Thank you very much for your interest, and 8 thank you very much for coming to this meeting. 9 Before I start with the speakers, I would like to 10 call please Mr. Nathan Sanderson, the policy advisor 11 to Governor Daugaard, who will deliver a short 12 statement on behalf of the governor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada
    Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada Kristian Gareau A Thesis in the Individualized Program Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts (Individualized Program) at Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada December 2016 © Kristian Gareau, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Kristian Gareau Entitled: Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Individualized Program) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ______Ketra Schmitt_____________________ Chair _____ Satoshi Ikeda_____________________ Examiner ______Warren Linds_____________________ Examiner ______Katja Neves______________________ Supervisor Approved by _______________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director _______________________________________________ Dean of Faculty Date December 12th, 2016______________________________ ABSTRACT Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada Kristian Gareau Economic and political pressures to extract Canada’s oil sands—among the most carbon- intensive and polluting fossil fuels on the planet—have increased manifold, while heightened risks of toxic spills, climate change, and environmental degradation
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Edelman Award Ceremony for Distinction in Practice
    2021 EDELMAN ogether, these awards demonstrate the power of advanced analytics at Intel, and its fundamental importance in our ability to deliver the technology AWARD Tleadership and reliable, top quality products the world needs and expects. CEREMONY — Kalani Ching, Intel Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science www.informs.org 2021 EDELMAN AWARD CEREMONY FOR DISTINCTION IN PRACTICE FRANZ EDELMAN AWARD Achievement in Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, & Management Science Emphasizing Beneficial Impact DANIEL H. WAGNER PRIZE Excellence in Operations Research Practice Emphasizing Innovative Methods and Clear Exposition UPS GEORGE D. SMITH PRIZE Strengthening Ties Between Academia & Industry Emphasizing Effective Academic Preparation INFORMS PRIZE Sustained Integration of Operations Research Emphasizing Long-Term, Multiproject Success The Edelman Award Ceremony 49 OCP 5 Ceremony Program 53 United Nations World Food Programme 6 Salute our Sponsors The Wagner Prize 7 Co-host—Dionne Aleman 57 Daniel H. Wagner Prize History 8 Co-host—Zahir Balaporia, CAP 58 2020 Wagner Prize Finalists Analytics and Operations Research Today 59 2020 Wagner Prize Winner 11 2021 Edelman Program Notes—Stephen Graves UPS George D. Smith Prize 14 Enriching the Lives of Every 63 UPS George D. Smith Prize History Person on Earth—Kalani Ching 65 2021 Smith Prize Competition 16 Operations Research: Billions and Billions of Benefits!—Jeffrey M. Alden 65 Smith Prize Past Winners TABLE OF Franz Edelman Award INFORMS Prize 19 Recognizing and Rewarding Real 71 INFORMS Prize History Achievement in O.R. and Analytics 71 INFORMS Prize Winners 20 The Finest Step Forward: Journey CONTENTS to the Franz Edelman Award 72 INFORMS Prize Criteria 23 Edelman First-Place Award Recipients 73 2021 INFORMS Prize Winner 26 The 2021 Selection Committee & Verifiers INFORMS 27 The 2021 Coaches & Judges 75 About INFORMS 29 The Edelman Laureates 76 Advancing the Practice of O.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1. Which of the Following Countries Do You Consider an Important Partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] Currently?
    MOFA FY2020 Opinion Poll on Japan (EUROPEAN COUNTRIES) (Edelman Data x Intelligence) Q1. Which of the following countries do you consider an important partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] currently? Total The UK France Germany Italy Hungary Base: Those Answering 2500 500 500 500 500 500 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Japan 18% 28% 14% 21% 14% 12% USA 43% 54% 33% 43% 40% 47% UK 18% 0% 28% 20% 16% 27% France 26% 36% 0% 50% 24% 20% Germany 38% 37% 63% 0% 34% 55% Italy 20% 22% 35% 23% 0% 20% EU 51% 47% 55% 60% 30% 61% Canada 16% 29% 22% 15% 8% 6% Russia 22% 9% 12% 23% 16% 51% China 32% 27% 20% 38% 32% 45% India 8% 18% 5% 9% 5% 2% Brazil 4% 6% 4% 4% 5% 2% Mexico 3% 5% 1% 3% 3% 2% South Africa 4% 10% 3% 4% 2% 1% Australia 11% 33% 5% 6% 5% 6% Republic of Korea 6% 8% 2% 8% 4% 6% Indonesia 2% 4% 1% 2% 1% 2% Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) 7% 12% 7% 6% 6% 2% Turkey 7% 6% 4% 9% 4% 14% Argentina 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% Others, specify 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% Don’t know / No idea 15% 18% 15% 13% 19% 10% Q2. And which of the following countries would you consider an important partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] in the future? Total The UK France Germany Italy Hungary Base: Those Answering 2500 500 500 500 500 500 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Japan 23% 34% 18% 22% 21% 20% USA 41% 51% 33% 43% 38% 43% UK 17% 0% 22% 19% 17% 29% France 22% 33% 0% 37% 17% 21% Germany 32% 34% 47% 0% 27% 52% Italy 17% 24% 21% 20% 0% 20% EU 45% 45% 45% 54% 24% 56% Canada 19% 34% 23% 18% 12% 8% Russia 25% 15% 16% 27% 19% 49% China 35% 30% 25% 40% 36% 46% India 14% 25% 14% 15% 13% 5% Brazil 8% 12% 10% 7% 8% 3% Mexico 5% 9% 5% 5% 4% 2% South Africa 7% 16% 5% 7% 7% 2% Australia 14% 33% 8% 10% 11% 8% Republic of Korea 10% 16% 5% 13% 8% 9% Indonesia 5% 10% 4% 4% 5% 3% Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) 10% 16% 10% 9% 11% 5% Turkey 9% 11% 3% 9% 5% 18% Argentina 5% 9% 4% 4% 5% 2% Others, specify 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Don’t know / No idea 17% 23% 19% 14% 17% 13% Q3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 EDELMAN AWARD Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science 2020 EDELMAN PROGRAM NOTES
    2020 EDELMAN AWARD Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science 2020 EDELMAN PROGRAM NOTES By Pinar Keskinocak, INFORMS President t is my pleasure As the largest European railway company, to welcome Deutsche Bahn must take into account a you to the 2020 staggering number of factors in the scheduling of Franz Edelman its more than 26,000 trains, which carry passengers IAward ceremony, as and hundreds of tons of goods throughout we celebrate this year’s Germany. To better execute their train scheduling, recipients of INFORMS’ Deutsche Bahn created a decision support system most prestigious award: that optimizes train rotations in every transport The Franz Edelman division, including cargo, and regional and long- Award for Achievement distance passenger transport. The new system has in Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and realized a 10% increase in locomotive and railcar Management Science. productivity and an 80% increase in time saved, as well as supports better planning and productivity. Today, we will recognize years of hard work and dedication by these finalist teams, representing the To identify devices at risk from an outage, IBM highest level of excellence in operations research Services (the Global Technology Services Unit (O.R.) and analytics. Thank you to all the finalists within IBM) has developed a novel approach to for your contributions and sharing the incredible indicate potential problems before they occur, impact of O.R. and analytics with the world. significantly improving their customer experience. Using machine learning and advanced data The Franz Edelman Award annually recognizes analytics, IBM can identify contributing risk factors organizations that achieve notable impact through and prompt a fix before a failure occurs, leading to a the applications of O.R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: in Brands We Trust? Mobile Survey
    Global Report Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 20th ANNUAL General Online Population Ages All slides show general Informed Public EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; BAROMETER per market 200 in all other markets Methodology Represents 17% of total global population Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of householdincome per age group in each market ‣ Report significant mediaconsumption Online survey in 28 markets and engagement in public policy and business news 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between Mass Population October 19 and November 18, 2019 All population not including informed public 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL FOR FUTURE SUCCESS Consumers Employees Regulators 20 years of Edelman Trust research on trust matters Trusted companies Trust drives Trusted companies have
    [Show full text]
  • Unplugging the Dirty Energy Economy / Ii
    Polaris Institute, June 2015 The Polaris Institute is a public interest research organization based in Canada. Since 1997 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies to take action on major public policy issues, including the corporate power that lies behind public policy making, on issues of energy security, water rights, climate change, green economy and global trade. Acknowledgements This Profile was researched and written by Mehreen Amani Khalfan, with additional research from Richard Girard, Daniel Cayley-Daoust, Erin Callary, Alexandra Bly and Brianna Aird. Special thanks to Heather Milton-Lightening and Clayton Thomas-Muller for their contributions. Cover design by Spencer Mann. This project was made possible through generous support from the European Climate Fund Polaris Institute 180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone: 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org i / Polaris Institute Table of Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSCANADA’S BUSINESS STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer 2020
    Global Report Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 20th ANNUAL General Online Population EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 Ages All slides show general Informed Public online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; BAROMETER per market 200 in all other markets Methodology Represents 17% of total global population Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each market ‣ Report significant media consumption Online survey in 28 markets and engagement in public policy and business news 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between Mass Population October 19 and November 18, 2019 All population not including informed public 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL FOR FUTURE SUCCESS Consumers Employees Regulators 20 years of Edelman Trust research on trust matters Trusted companies Trust drives Trusted companies have
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER South Korea 19Th ANNUAL General Online Population Informed Public 1,150 Respondents Per Market 500 Respondents in U.S
    2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER South Korea 19th ANNUAL General Online Population Informed Public 1,150 respondents per market 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other markets EDELMAN TRUST Ages 18+ Represents 16% of total global population All slides show general online BAROMETER population data unless otherwise noted Must meet 4 criteria Methodology - Ages 25-64 - College-educated - In top 25% of household income per age group in each market - Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and business news Mass Population Online Survey in 27 Markets All population not including informed public 33,000+ respondents total Represents 84% of total global population All fieldwork was conducted between October 19 and November 16, 2018 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% (N=31,050), informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000), mass population +/- 2019 Focus on 55% of global general population are full- or 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 0.8 part-time employees (but not self-employed) (N=15,525). Employer-Employee Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9 Oversample of employees of multinational (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by market, Relationship companies: 500 respondents per market China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 739, varies by market). Employee MOE: 27-market = +/- 0.8% (N=16,944) Market-specific = +/- 3.2 to 4.6% (N=min 446, varies by market) 2 TRUST IN RETROSPECT 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Rising Fall of the Earned Media U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer
    Trust in Canada @EdelmanCanada #TrustBarometer www.edelman.ca/trust- barometer/trust-barometer-2020 20TH ANNUAL General Online Population EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 Ages All slides show general Informed Public BAROMETER online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; Methodology per market; 200 in all other markets 1,500 Represents 17% of total global population in Canada Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of householdincome per Online survey in 28 markets age group in each market 34,000+ respondents total ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and All fieldwork was conducted between business news October 19 and November 18, 2019 Mass Population 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- All population not 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- including informed public 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL TRUST MATTERS TO… FOR FUTURE SUCCESS 20 years of Edelman research on trust INVESTORS
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-Edelman-Trust-Barometer.Pdf
    Global Report 21st ANNUAL EDELMAN TRUST General Online Population Informed Public BAROMETER 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 1,150 100 respondents in Nigeria; Methodology respondents per country 200 in all other countries Ages Represents 17% of total global population 18+ Must meet 4 criteria: Online survey in 28 countries* ‣ Age 25-64 All slides show general 33,000+ respondents online population data ‣ College-educated 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer fieldwork unless otherwise noted ‣ In top 25% of household income conducted from October 19 to November 18, 2020 per age group in each country ‣ Report significant engagement in public policy and business news *The 2021 Trust Barometer 27-market global averages (for the general population, mass population and informed public) do not include Nigeria Mass Population 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% All population not including (N=31,050); informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000); mass population +/- 0.6% (N=25,050+); half-sample global general online population +/- informed public 0.8% (N=15,525). Country-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% Represents 83% of total global (N=1,150); informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by country), population except for China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500) and Nigeria +/- 9.8% (N=100); mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N=min 736, varies by country), except for Nigeria +/- 2.9% (N=1,125). U.S. Post-Election Supplement 1,500 U.S. respondents, fielded December 14 to 18, 2020 U.S. Post-Election Supplement margin of error: +/- 2.5% (N=1,500).
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer
    Country Report Trust in Singapore 21st ANNUAL EDELMAN TRUST General Online Population Informed Public BAROMETER 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 1,150 100 respondents in Nigeria; Methodology respondents per country 200 in all other countries Ages Represents 17% of total global population 18+ Must meet 4 criteria: Online survey in 28 countries* ‣ Age 25-64 All slides show general 33,000+ respondents online population data ‣ College-educated 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer fieldwork unless otherwise noted ‣ In top 25% of household income conducted from October 19 to November 18, 2020 per age group in each country ‣ Report significant engagement in public policy and business news *The 2021 Trust Barometer 27-market global averages (for the general population, mass population and informed public) do not include Nigeria Mass Population 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% All population not including (N=31,050); informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000); mass population +/- 0.6% (N=25,050+); half-sample global general online population +/- informed public 0.8% (N=15,525). Country-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% Represents 83% of total global (N=1,150); informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by country), population except for China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500) and Nigeria +/- 9.8% (N=100); mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N=min 736, varies by country), except for Nigeria +/- 2.9% (N=1,125). U.S. Post-Election Supplement 1,500 U.S. respondents, fielded December 14 to 18, 2020 U.S. Post-Election Supplement margin of error: +/- 2.5% (N=1,500).
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer 2020
    Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 The 20th annual trust and credibility survey. Research conducted by Edelman Intelligence, a global insight and analytics consultancy. Methodology Online survey in 28 markets 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between October 19 and November 18, 2019 General Online Population Informed Public Mass Population Ages 18+ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; All respondents not including Informed Public 1,150 respondents per market 200 in all other markets Represents 17% of total Represents 83% of total global population global population Must meet 4 criteria Ages 25-64 College-educated In top 25% of household income per age group in each market Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and business news 1 Fire and rescue personnel battle a bushfire near the town of Bilpin in On the cover Sydney, Australia: David Gray/Getty Images; 2 Jamie Dimon, Chairman of Business Roundtable, which released a new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation signed by 181 CEOs committed to leading their companies 1 5 for the benefit of all stakeholders: Mark Wilson/Getty Images;3 Swedish 2 6 environment activist Greta Thunberg gives a speech at the plenary session during the COP25 Climate Conference: The Asahi Shimbun via Getty 3 Images; 4 China's President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump 7 at the G20 Summit in Osaka: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images; 4 8 5 UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson talks with newly elected Conservative MPs at the Houses
    [Show full text]