Introduction 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction 1 Notes Introduction 1 . Clifford Krauss, “Accident Leads to Scrutiny of Oil Sand Production,” New York Times , May 3, 2014, B1. 2 . George A. Gonzalez, Energy and the Politics of the North Atlantic (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2013). 3 . Alfred Chandler, Jr., “Anthracite Coal and the Beginnings of the Industrial Revolution in the United States,” Business History Review 46, no. 2, 1972: 141–181. 4 . Steve Isser, The Economics and Politics of the United States Oil Industry, 1920–1990: Profits, Populism, and Petroleum (New York: Routledge, 1996); Roger M. Olien and Diana Davids Olien, Oil and Ideology: The Cultural Creation of the American Petroleum Industry (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000); Diana Davids Olien and Roger M. Olien, Oil in Texas: The Gusher Age, 1895–1945 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002); Francisco Parra, Oil Politics: A Modern History of Petroleum (New York: I. B. Tauris, 2004). 5 . Robert Paul Thomas, An Analysis of the Pattern of Growth of the Automobile Industry, 1895–1929 (New York: Arno, 1977); Jean-Pierre Bardou, Jean- Jacques Chanaron, Patrick Fridenson, and James M. Laux, The Automobile Revolution: The Impact of an Industry (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1982); T. C. Barker, “The International History of Motor Transport,” Journal of Contemporary History 20, no. 1 (1985): 3–19; David J. St. Clair, The Motorization of American Cities (New York: Praeger, 1986). 6 . Robert D. Atkinson, The Past and Future of America’s Economy: Long Waves of Innovation that Power Cycles of Growth (Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2004); Alexander J. Field, “Technological Change and U.S. Productivity Growth in the Interwar Years,” Journal of Economic History 66, no. 1 (2006): 203–234; Michael H. Hunt, The American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007); Joan Hoff, A Faustian Foreign Policy: From Woodrow Wilson to George W. Bush (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008); Stanley Buder, Capitalizing on Change: A Social History of American Business (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina 104 ● Notes Press, 2009); Charles J. Shindo, 1927 and the Rise of Modern America (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2010). 7 . Gonzalez, Energy and the Politics of the North Atlantic , chap. 5. 8 . William S. Borden, The Pacific Alliance: United States Foreign Economic Policy and Japanese Trade Recovery, 1947–1955 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984); Michael Schaller, Altered States: The United States and Japan Since the Occupation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997); Gary Herrigel, Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000); Horst Siebert, The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005); John Swenson-Wright, Unequal Allies?: United States Security and Alliance Policy toward Japan, 1945–1960 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005); Belay Seyoum, Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures , 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2008); Ian Talley and Jeffrey Sparshott, “U.S. Blasts Germany’s Economic Policies,” Wall Street Journal , October 31, 2013. Web. 9 . Philip J. Funigiello, American-Soviet Trade in the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988); Lewis H. Siegelbaum, Cars for Comrades: The Life of the Soviet Automobile (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008). 10 . Joachim Remak, The Origins of World War I, 1871–1914 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967); Darryl Holter, The Battle for Coal: Miners and the Politics of Nationalization in France, 1940–1950 (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1992); Richard F. Hamilton and Holger H. Herwig (eds.), The Origins of World War I (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008); Karine Varley, Under the Shadow of Defeat: The War of 1870–71 in French Memory (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009). 11 . Jonathan G. Utley, Going to War with Japan, 1937–1941 (New York: Fordham University Press, 2005). 12 . Gonzalez, Energy and the Politics of the North Atlantic , chap. 4. 13 . Daniel Yergin, The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1991); Norman Rich, Hitler’s War Aims: Ideology, the Nazi State, and the Course of Expansion (New York: W. W. Norton, 1992); Victor Rothwell, War Aims in the Second World War: The War Aims of the Major Belligerents, 1939–45 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005); Adam Tooze, The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy (New York: Viking, 2007); Andrew Roberts, The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War (New York: Harper, 2011); David Stahel, Kiev 1941: Hitler’s Battle for Supremacy in the East (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012). 14 . Derek Lutterbeck, and Georgij Engelbrecht, “The West and Russia in the Mediterranean: Towards a Renewed Rivalry?” Mediterranean Politics 14, no. 3 (2009): 385–406; Clifford Krauss, “The Scramble for Access to Libya’s Oil Wealth Begins,” New York Times , August 23, 2011, B1; Jessica Donati, “Foreign Firms Quietly Return to Libya’s Oil Rich East,” Reuters , October 8, 2011; Shane Scott, “West Sees Libya as Opportunity for Businesses,” New York Notes ● 105 Times , October 29, 2011, A1; Clifford Krauss, “Spared in War, Libya’s Oil Flow Is Surging Back,” New York Times , November 16, 2011, A1; Christopher S. Chivvis, Toppling Qaddafi: Libya and the Limits of Liberal Intervention (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013). 15 . John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics , updated ed. (New York: Norton, 2014); also see Richard S. Rosecrance and Steven E. Miller eds. The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.-China Conflict (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014); Keith Bradsher, “Allure and Alarm as China Paves Way for New Silk Road,” New York Times, December 26, 2015, A1. 16. Brian Spegele and Matt Bradley, “Middle East Oil Fuels Fresh China-U.S. Tensions,” Wall Street Journal , October 11, 2013, A1; Eric Schmitt, “Eyes on Iran, Navy in Gulf Stays at Ready,” New York Times , December 9, 2013, A4. 17 . Adam Watson, The Evolution of International Society , 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2009 [1992]); James G. Morgan, Into New Territory: American Historians and the Concept of U.S. Imperialism (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2014); Emanuele Saccarelli and Latha Varadarajan, Imperialism Past and Present (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015). 18 . David Harvey, The New Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003); also see Willian J. Broad, “In Taking Crimea, Putin Gains a Sea of Fuel Reserves,” New York Times , May 18, 2014, A1. 19 . Russell Gold, “Shale-Oil Boom Puts Spotlight on Crude Export Ban,” Wall Street Journal , January 1, 2014. Web. 20 . Mitt Romney, “U.S. can be Energy Superpower,” Columbus Dispatch , March 5, 2012. Web. 21 . Coral Davenport and Steven Erlanger, “U.S. Hopes Boom in Natural Gas Can Curb Putin,” New York Times , March 6, 2014, A1. Also see “Natural Gas as a Diplomatic Tool,” New York Times, March 7, 2014, A24; Clifford Krauss, “U.S. Gas Tantalizes Europe, but It’s Not a Quick Fix,” New York Times , April 8, 2014, B1; Stanley Reed and James Kanter, “For a European Energy Chief, a Difficult Alliance,” New York Times , April 28, 2014, B1; Rick Gladstone, “Russia and Iran Reported in Talks on Energy Deal Worth Billions,” New York Times , April 29, 2014, A12; Jim Yardley and Jo Becker, ”How Putin Forged a Pipeline Deal That Derailed,” New York Times , December 31, 2014, A1. 22 . Robert Boschman and Mario Trono eds. Found in Alberta: Environmental Themes for the Anthropocene (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2014); Andrew Nikiforuk, “A Forest Threatened by Keystone XL,” New York Times , November 18, 2014, A25. 23 . Jerome Klassen, Joining Empire : The Political Economy of the New Canadian Foreign Policy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014). 1 Canadian Oil Sands and the American Empire 1 . “North Dakota Hits Milestone in Oil Production,” New York Times , June 18, 2014, B2; Russell Gold, The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World (New York: Simon 106 ● Notes & Schuster, 2014); Michael Levi, The Power Surge: Energy, Opportunity, and the Battle for America’s Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014); Michael Wines, “White House Opens Door to Exploring Atlantic for Oil,” New York Times , July 19, 2014, A12; Clifford Krauss, “A New American Oil Bonanza,” New York Times , August 29, 2014, B1; Clifford Krauss, “A U-Turn for a Terminal Built to Import Natural Gas,” New York Times , September 30, 2014, B1; Clifford Krauss, “Reversing the Flow of Oil,” New York Times , October 8, 2014, F1; “Natural Gas Overtakes Coal in U.S. Electric Generation,” New York Times , July 14, 2015, B2; Clifford Krauss, “U.S. Allows Limited Oil Exports to Mexico, but Won’t Lift Longstanding Ban,” New York Times , August 15, 2015, B3. 2 . Elizabeth Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History (New York: Henry Holt, 2014); Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, The Collapse of Western Civilization: A View from the Future (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014); Justin Gillis, “Scientists Sound Alarm on Climate,” New York Times , March 18, 2014, D1; Justin Gillis, “Climate Signals, Growing Louder,” New York Times , April 1, 2014, A22; Justin Gillis, “Climate Efforts Falling Short, U.N. Panel Says,” New York Times , April 14, 2014, A1; Ted Nordhaus
Recommended publications
  • Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada
    Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada Kristian Gareau A Thesis in the Individualized Program Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts (Individualized Program) at Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada December 2016 © Kristian Gareau, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Kristian Gareau Entitled: Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Individualized Program) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ______Ketra Schmitt_____________________ Chair _____ Satoshi Ikeda_____________________ Examiner ______Warren Linds_____________________ Examiner ______Katja Neves______________________ Supervisor Approved by _______________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director _______________________________________________ Dean of Faculty Date December 12th, 2016______________________________ ABSTRACT Pipeline Politics: Capitalism, Extractivism, and Resistance in Canada Kristian Gareau Economic and political pressures to extract Canada’s oil sands—among the most carbon- intensive and polluting fossil fuels on the planet—have increased manifold, while heightened risks of toxic spills, climate change, and environmental degradation
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Edelman Award Ceremony for Distinction in Practice
    2021 EDELMAN ogether, these awards demonstrate the power of advanced analytics at Intel, and its fundamental importance in our ability to deliver the technology AWARD Tleadership and reliable, top quality products the world needs and expects. CEREMONY — Kalani Ching, Intel Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science www.informs.org 2021 EDELMAN AWARD CEREMONY FOR DISTINCTION IN PRACTICE FRANZ EDELMAN AWARD Achievement in Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, & Management Science Emphasizing Beneficial Impact DANIEL H. WAGNER PRIZE Excellence in Operations Research Practice Emphasizing Innovative Methods and Clear Exposition UPS GEORGE D. SMITH PRIZE Strengthening Ties Between Academia & Industry Emphasizing Effective Academic Preparation INFORMS PRIZE Sustained Integration of Operations Research Emphasizing Long-Term, Multiproject Success The Edelman Award Ceremony 49 OCP 5 Ceremony Program 53 United Nations World Food Programme 6 Salute our Sponsors The Wagner Prize 7 Co-host—Dionne Aleman 57 Daniel H. Wagner Prize History 8 Co-host—Zahir Balaporia, CAP 58 2020 Wagner Prize Finalists Analytics and Operations Research Today 59 2020 Wagner Prize Winner 11 2021 Edelman Program Notes—Stephen Graves UPS George D. Smith Prize 14 Enriching the Lives of Every 63 UPS George D. Smith Prize History Person on Earth—Kalani Ching 65 2021 Smith Prize Competition 16 Operations Research: Billions and Billions of Benefits!—Jeffrey M. Alden 65 Smith Prize Past Winners TABLE OF Franz Edelman Award INFORMS Prize 19 Recognizing and Rewarding Real 71 INFORMS Prize History Achievement in O.R. and Analytics 71 INFORMS Prize Winners 20 The Finest Step Forward: Journey CONTENTS to the Franz Edelman Award 72 INFORMS Prize Criteria 23 Edelman First-Place Award Recipients 73 2021 INFORMS Prize Winner 26 The 2021 Selection Committee & Verifiers INFORMS 27 The 2021 Coaches & Judges 75 About INFORMS 29 The Edelman Laureates 76 Advancing the Practice of O.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1. Which of the Following Countries Do You Consider an Important Partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] Currently?
    MOFA FY2020 Opinion Poll on Japan (EUROPEAN COUNTRIES) (Edelman Data x Intelligence) Q1. Which of the following countries do you consider an important partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] currently? Total The UK France Germany Italy Hungary Base: Those Answering 2500 500 500 500 500 500 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Japan 18% 28% 14% 21% 14% 12% USA 43% 54% 33% 43% 40% 47% UK 18% 0% 28% 20% 16% 27% France 26% 36% 0% 50% 24% 20% Germany 38% 37% 63% 0% 34% 55% Italy 20% 22% 35% 23% 0% 20% EU 51% 47% 55% 60% 30% 61% Canada 16% 29% 22% 15% 8% 6% Russia 22% 9% 12% 23% 16% 51% China 32% 27% 20% 38% 32% 45% India 8% 18% 5% 9% 5% 2% Brazil 4% 6% 4% 4% 5% 2% Mexico 3% 5% 1% 3% 3% 2% South Africa 4% 10% 3% 4% 2% 1% Australia 11% 33% 5% 6% 5% 6% Republic of Korea 6% 8% 2% 8% 4% 6% Indonesia 2% 4% 1% 2% 1% 2% Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) 7% 12% 7% 6% 6% 2% Turkey 7% 6% 4% 9% 4% 14% Argentina 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% Others, specify 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% Don’t know / No idea 15% 18% 15% 13% 19% 10% Q2. And which of the following countries would you consider an important partner to [YOUR COUNTRY] in the future? Total The UK France Germany Italy Hungary Base: Those Answering 2500 500 500 500 500 500 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Japan 23% 34% 18% 22% 21% 20% USA 41% 51% 33% 43% 38% 43% UK 17% 0% 22% 19% 17% 29% France 22% 33% 0% 37% 17% 21% Germany 32% 34% 47% 0% 27% 52% Italy 17% 24% 21% 20% 0% 20% EU 45% 45% 45% 54% 24% 56% Canada 19% 34% 23% 18% 12% 8% Russia 25% 15% 16% 27% 19% 49% China 35% 30% 25% 40% 36% 46% India 14% 25% 14% 15% 13% 5% Brazil 8% 12% 10% 7% 8% 3% Mexico 5% 9% 5% 5% 4% 2% South Africa 7% 16% 5% 7% 7% 2% Australia 14% 33% 8% 10% 11% 8% Republic of Korea 10% 16% 5% 13% 8% 9% Indonesia 5% 10% 4% 4% 5% 3% Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) 10% 16% 10% 9% 11% 5% Turkey 9% 11% 3% 9% 5% 18% Argentina 5% 9% 4% 4% 5% 2% Others, specify 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Don’t know / No idea 17% 23% 19% 14% 17% 13% Q3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 EDELMAN AWARD Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science 2020 EDELMAN PROGRAM NOTES
    2020 EDELMAN AWARD Recognizing Distinction in the Practice of Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and Management Science 2020 EDELMAN PROGRAM NOTES By Pinar Keskinocak, INFORMS President t is my pleasure As the largest European railway company, to welcome Deutsche Bahn must take into account a you to the 2020 staggering number of factors in the scheduling of Franz Edelman its more than 26,000 trains, which carry passengers IAward ceremony, as and hundreds of tons of goods throughout we celebrate this year’s Germany. To better execute their train scheduling, recipients of INFORMS’ Deutsche Bahn created a decision support system most prestigious award: that optimizes train rotations in every transport The Franz Edelman division, including cargo, and regional and long- Award for Achievement distance passenger transport. The new system has in Advanced Analytics, Operations Research, and realized a 10% increase in locomotive and railcar Management Science. productivity and an 80% increase in time saved, as well as supports better planning and productivity. Today, we will recognize years of hard work and dedication by these finalist teams, representing the To identify devices at risk from an outage, IBM highest level of excellence in operations research Services (the Global Technology Services Unit (O.R.) and analytics. Thank you to all the finalists within IBM) has developed a novel approach to for your contributions and sharing the incredible indicate potential problems before they occur, impact of O.R. and analytics with the world. significantly improving their customer experience. Using machine learning and advanced data The Franz Edelman Award annually recognizes analytics, IBM can identify contributing risk factors organizations that achieve notable impact through and prompt a fix before a failure occurs, leading to a the applications of O.R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: in Brands We Trust? Mobile Survey
    Global Report Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 20th ANNUAL General Online Population Ages All slides show general Informed Public EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; BAROMETER per market 200 in all other markets Methodology Represents 17% of total global population Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of householdincome per age group in each market ‣ Report significant mediaconsumption Online survey in 28 markets and engagement in public policy and business news 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between Mass Population October 19 and November 18, 2019 All population not including informed public 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL FOR FUTURE SUCCESS Consumers Employees Regulators 20 years of Edelman Trust research on trust matters Trusted companies Trust drives Trusted companies have
    [Show full text]
  • Unplugging the Dirty Energy Economy / Ii
    Polaris Institute, June 2015 The Polaris Institute is a public interest research organization based in Canada. Since 1997 Polaris has been dedicated to developing tools and strategies to take action on major public policy issues, including the corporate power that lies behind public policy making, on issues of energy security, water rights, climate change, green economy and global trade. Acknowledgements This Profile was researched and written by Mehreen Amani Khalfan, with additional research from Richard Girard, Daniel Cayley-Daoust, Erin Callary, Alexandra Bly and Brianna Aird. Special thanks to Heather Milton-Lightening and Clayton Thomas-Muller for their contributions. Cover design by Spencer Mann. This project was made possible through generous support from the European Climate Fund Polaris Institute 180 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Ottawa, ON K2P 1P5 Phone: 613-237-1717 Fax: 613-237-3359 Email: [email protected] www.polarisinstitute.org i / Polaris Institute Table of Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSCANADA’S BUSINESS STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer 2020
    Global Report Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 20th ANNUAL General Online Population EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 Ages All slides show general Informed Public online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; BAROMETER per market 200 in all other markets Methodology Represents 17% of total global population Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each market ‣ Report significant media consumption Online survey in 28 markets and engagement in public policy and business news 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between Mass Population October 19 and November 18, 2019 All population not including informed public 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL FOR FUTURE SUCCESS Consumers Employees Regulators 20 years of Edelman Trust research on trust matters Trusted companies Trust drives Trusted companies have
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER South Korea 19Th ANNUAL General Online Population Informed Public 1,150 Respondents Per Market 500 Respondents in U.S
    2019 EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER South Korea 19th ANNUAL General Online Population Informed Public 1,150 respondents per market 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other markets EDELMAN TRUST Ages 18+ Represents 16% of total global population All slides show general online BAROMETER population data unless otherwise noted Must meet 4 criteria Methodology - Ages 25-64 - College-educated - In top 25% of household income per age group in each market - Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and business news Mass Population Online Survey in 27 Markets All population not including informed public 33,000+ respondents total Represents 84% of total global population All fieldwork was conducted between October 19 and November 16, 2018 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% (N=31,050), informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000), mass population +/- 2019 Focus on 55% of global general population are full- or 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- 0.8 part-time employees (but not self-employed) (N=15,525). Employer-Employee Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9 Oversample of employees of multinational (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by market, Relationship companies: 500 respondents per market China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 739, varies by market). Employee MOE: 27-market = +/- 0.8% (N=16,944) Market-specific = +/- 3.2 to 4.6% (N=min 446, varies by market) 2 TRUST IN RETROSPECT 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Rising Fall of the Earned Media U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer
    Trust in Canada @EdelmanCanada #TrustBarometer www.edelman.ca/trust- barometer/trust-barometer-2020 20TH ANNUAL General Online Population EDELMAN TRUST 1,150 Ages All slides show general Informed Public BAROMETER online population data respondents 18+ unless otherwise noted 500 respondents in U.S. and China; Methodology per market; 200 in all other markets 1,500 Represents 17% of total global population in Canada Must meet 4 criteria ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College-educated ‣ In top 25% of householdincome per Online survey in 28 markets age group in each market 34,000+ respondents total ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and All fieldwork was conducted between business news October 19 and November 18, 2019 Mass Population 28-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% (N=32,200), informed public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), mass population +/- All population not 0.6% (26,000+), half-sample global general online population +/- including informed public 0.8% (N=16,100). Market-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% 2020 Gen Z oversample Represents 83% of total (N=1,150), informed public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by market), 250 respondents age 18-24 per market global population China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N =min 736, varies by market). Gen Z MOE: 28-market = +/- 1.5% (N=4,310) Market-specific = +/- 5.3 to 10.5% (N=min 88, varies by market). 2 TRUST ESSENTIAL TRUST MATTERS TO… FOR FUTURE SUCCESS 20 years of Edelman research on trust INVESTORS
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-Edelman-Trust-Barometer.Pdf
    Global Report 21st ANNUAL EDELMAN TRUST General Online Population Informed Public BAROMETER 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 1,150 100 respondents in Nigeria; Methodology respondents per country 200 in all other countries Ages Represents 17% of total global population 18+ Must meet 4 criteria: Online survey in 28 countries* ‣ Age 25-64 All slides show general 33,000+ respondents online population data ‣ College-educated 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer fieldwork unless otherwise noted ‣ In top 25% of household income conducted from October 19 to November 18, 2020 per age group in each country ‣ Report significant engagement in public policy and business news *The 2021 Trust Barometer 27-market global averages (for the general population, mass population and informed public) do not include Nigeria Mass Population 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% All population not including (N=31,050); informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000); mass population +/- 0.6% (N=25,050+); half-sample global general online population +/- informed public 0.8% (N=15,525). Country-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% Represents 83% of total global (N=1,150); informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by country), population except for China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500) and Nigeria +/- 9.8% (N=100); mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N=min 736, varies by country), except for Nigeria +/- 2.9% (N=1,125). U.S. Post-Election Supplement 1,500 U.S. respondents, fielded December 14 to 18, 2020 U.S. Post-Election Supplement margin of error: +/- 2.5% (N=1,500).
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer
    Country Report Trust in Singapore 21st ANNUAL EDELMAN TRUST General Online Population Informed Public BAROMETER 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 1,150 100 respondents in Nigeria; Methodology respondents per country 200 in all other countries Ages Represents 17% of total global population 18+ Must meet 4 criteria: Online survey in 28 countries* ‣ Age 25-64 All slides show general 33,000+ respondents online population data ‣ College-educated 2021 Edelman Trust Barometer fieldwork unless otherwise noted ‣ In top 25% of household income conducted from October 19 to November 18, 2020 per age group in each country ‣ Report significant engagement in public policy and business news *The 2021 Trust Barometer 27-market global averages (for the general population, mass population and informed public) do not include Nigeria Mass Population 27-market global data margin of error: General population +/- 0.6% All population not including (N=31,050); informed public +/- 1.3% (N=6,000); mass population +/- 0.6% (N=25,050+); half-sample global general online population +/- informed public 0.8% (N=15,525). Country-specific data margin of error: General population +/- 2.9% Represents 83% of total global (N=1,150); informed public +/- 6.9% (N=min 200, varies by country), population except for China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500) and Nigeria +/- 9.8% (N=100); mass population +/- 3.0% to 3.6% (N=min 736, varies by country), except for Nigeria +/- 2.9% (N=1,125). U.S. Post-Election Supplement 1,500 U.S. respondents, fielded December 14 to 18, 2020 U.S. Post-Election Supplement margin of error: +/- 2.5% (N=1,500).
    [Show full text]
  • Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer 2020
    Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer 2020 The 20th annual trust and credibility survey. Research conducted by Edelman Intelligence, a global insight and analytics consultancy. Methodology Online survey in 28 markets 34,000+ respondents total All fieldwork was conducted between October 19 and November 18, 2019 General Online Population Informed Public Mass Population Ages 18+ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; All respondents not including Informed Public 1,150 respondents per market 200 in all other markets Represents 17% of total Represents 83% of total global population global population Must meet 4 criteria Ages 25-64 College-educated In top 25% of household income per age group in each market Report significant media consumption and engagement in public policy and business news 1 Fire and rescue personnel battle a bushfire near the town of Bilpin in On the cover Sydney, Australia: David Gray/Getty Images; 2 Jamie Dimon, Chairman of Business Roundtable, which released a new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation signed by 181 CEOs committed to leading their companies 1 5 for the benefit of all stakeholders: Mark Wilson/Getty Images;3 Swedish 2 6 environment activist Greta Thunberg gives a speech at the plenary session during the COP25 Climate Conference: The Asahi Shimbun via Getty 3 Images; 4 China's President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump 7 at the G20 Summit in Osaka: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images; 4 8 5 UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson talks with newly elected Conservative MPs at the Houses
    [Show full text]